Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 minor 79 references

The importance of binary stars

T0 review · 0 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Most stars form with companions, and binary interactions shape stellar evolution, planet formation, gravity, and cosmic distance measurements.

desk verdict A genuinely useful, honest review of binary-star science – no new results, but a solid synthesis that deserves a fair referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.18470 v1 pith:NDB5T7SK submitted 2024-11-27 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.EP

Henri M.J. Boffin , David Jones This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.EP
keywords binarystarsstellarmultiplicityevolutioneclipsingbinariesplanetformationgravitationalwavescosmicdistanceladdermodifiedgravity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper makes the case that binary stars are not a niche subfield but central to astrophysics. It assembles evidence that most stars form with companions—at least half of Sun-like stars and close to all massive stars—and that a large fraction interact over their lifetimes, altering the structure and evolution of both components. It argues that binaries provide quasi-model-independent masses, radii, and luminosities, and that they bear directly on stellar evolution, star formation, planet occurrence, gravity, and the cosmic distance ladder. A sympathetic reader would take away that any complete account of how stars, planets, and the universe are measured must treat binarity as the rule, not the exception.

What carries the argument

The central object is the binary star system itself, used as a multi-purpose astronomical instrument. Its power comes from orbital mechanics: a binary's orbit encodes component masses, eclipses map their radii, and orbital-period decay reveals gravitational-wave emission. The review leans on several specific mechanisms—the stability limits for planets in binaries (S-orbits versus P-orbits), the near-model-independent parameter estimation from double-eclipsing binaries, and the sensitivity of very wide binaries to low-acceleration gravity. These mechanisms turn binaries into testbeds that single stars cannot provide.

What would settle it

A rigorous, volume-complete census of solar-type stars—combining precision astrometry with multi-epoch radial velocities—that found a true companion fraction below roughly 30% would falsify the review's opening premise. Alternatively, showing that close binary interactions leave stellar structure essentially unchanged would remove the paper's stated route to producing exotic objects.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that stars are mostly found in binary and multiple systems, with companion fractions rising from at least 50% for solar-like stars to near 100% for the most massive stars. Because a large fraction of these systems interact, binaries can rewrite stellar structure and produce exotic objects—blue stragglers, symbiotic and barium stars, novae, supernovae, and gravitational-wave progenitors—that single-star evolution models cannot explain. The same systems give astronomers a quasi-model-independent way to measure stellar masses, radii, and luminosities, and they serve as natural testbeds for gravity through pulsar timing, gravitational-wave observations, and wide-binary dynamics.

Load-bearing premise

The entire argument rests on the surveyed multiplicity statistics being right: if far fewer than half of Sun-like stars have companions, the claim that binaries are central to most of astrophysics loses its foundation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Stellar evolution models that ignore binary interactions will fail to reproduce observed exotic populations such as blue stragglers, novae, supernovae, and gravitational-wave progenitors.
  • Precise masses and radii from eclipsing binaries will keep tightening the empirical benchmarks against which stellar evolution models are calibrated, exposing differences between model grids.
  • Planet formation statistics must be corrected for stellar multiplicity: close binaries suppress close-in planets, while very wide companions leave them largely intact.
  • The cosmic distance scale can be improved—or shown to be biased—by accounting for binaries among Cepheids and by using eclipsing binaries to calibrate the Large Magellanic Cloud distance.
  • Wide binary dynamics offer a live, though currently inconclusive, observational test of gravity in the low-acceleration regime, with direct bearing on modified-gravity theories.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the quoted multiplicity fractions are accepted, exoplanet occurrence rates derived from single-star samples are likely systematically overestimated; future surveys should quote planet rates conditional on stellar multiplicity.
  • The paper's discussion of Cepheid binarity implies that the local distance ladder may carry a hidden systematic in $H_0$ measurements, and quantifying it would require a complete binary census of the Cepheids used in calibrations.
  • The reported anti-correlation between close binary fraction and $\alpha$-element abundances suggests a testable prediction: metal-poor, $\alpha$-poor populations should show enhanced disk-fragmentation binary formation in resolved star-forming regions.
  • The connection drawn between a massive quiescent black hole in a binary and low-metallicity, dynamically formed systems implies that future astrometric surveys should find more such binaries preferentially in low-metallicity environments.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript is an invited review summarising the importance of binary stars across many areas of astrophysics. It opens with the claim that most stars are in binary or multiple systems and that a large fraction will interact, producing exotic objects. It then discusses the use of detached eclipsing binaries to obtain masses, radii, and luminosities nearly model-independently; constraints on stellar evolution and star formation; tests of gravitational theories using binary pulsars, gravitational-wave sources, and wide binaries; the impact of binarity on planet formation and occurrence; and the role of eclipsing binaries, Cepheids, and Type Ia supernovae in the cosmic distance ladder. The paper is a synthesis of the existing literature, with the authors explicitly acknowledging several caveats, such as the limb-darkening model dependence of light-curve analyses and the currently inconclusive status of wide-binary gravity tests.

Significance. If the synthesis is accepted, the paper provides a concise and well-referenced statement of the pervasive role of binary stars in stellar, planetary, and gravitational physics. Its strengths include the explicit acknowledgment of the limitations of the quoted methods, the balanced discussion of the wide-binary MOND controversy, and the clear identification of open questions such as the nature of Type Ia supernova progenitors and the status of the NN Ser planets. The paper does not attempt a new derivation, but that is appropriate for an invited review; it offers a useful entry point for non-specialists and a compact reference list for experts. The caveats are internal to the review and do not undermine the central message that binary stars must be accounted for in nearly every area of astrophysics.

minor comments (6)
  1. [Throughout] There are a number of typographical and grammatical errors that should be corrected before publication: in Section 5, "syandard candles" should be "standard candles"; the heading of Section 3 should be "Binary stars constrain theories" rather than "constraint theories"; the footnote on page 3 contains "more precise that" instead of "more precise than"; and the phrase "the closest systems to be Sun" on page 2 should be "to the Sun".
  2. [Abstract and Section 1] The abstract states that "at least 50% of all solar-like stars have companions" without a citation; the supporting references appear later in Section 1, but a citation in the abstract or a footnote would make the quantitative claim easier to trace and would make the abstract self-contained.
  3. [Section 2] The authors are appropriately candid that the "model-independent" masses and radii obtained from eclipsing binaries nevertheless depend on limb-darkening coefficients derived from model atmospheres; this caveat is correctly placed and stated, but the abstract's phrase "quasi-model independent" could carry a footnote repeating this qualification for careful readers.
  4. [Sections 3-5] The manuscript flags its own limitations in a balanced way: Section 3 concludes that wide-binary gravity tests are still inconclusive owing to projection effects and the external field effect, Section 4 notes the ongoing debate about the reality of the NN Ser planets, and Section 5 questions the assumption that Type Ia supernovae are standard candles. These admissions are explicit and do not weaken the paper's central synthetic claim.
  5. [Section 4] The sentence "lists 27 such planets only, compared to" contains a redundant "only", and the informal remark about Alpha Centauri and Proxima Centauri forming a triple system is fine in a review but could be phrased more precisely.
  6. [Concluding section] The paper ends rather abruptly with a remark about Type Ia supernovae; a brief concluding paragraph that recapitulates the central message and lists open questions would improve readability and give the review a more polished closing.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is a literature-based review whose broad thesis does not reduce to any fitted parameter or self-citation chain.

full rationale

This is an invited review article, not a paper presenting a new derivation or a single falsifiable prediction. Its central claim—that binary stars are ubiquitous and important across stellar, planetary, and gravitational astrophysics—is supported by citations to external observational surveys, model-independent eclipsing-binary mass and radius determinations, gravitational-wave detections, and distance-scale measurements. No equation in the paper defines a target quantity in terms of itself, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The abstract's multiplicity fractions ('at least 50% of all solar-like stars have companions... up to 100% for the most massive stars') are taken from cited surveys rather than re-derived, but the paper's argument does not hinge on those exact values; even substantially lower fractions would leave the main points of Sections 2–5 intact. A few self-citations by the authors (e.g., Boffin & Pourbaix 2019; Boffin & Trimble 2020; Pourbaix & Boffin 2016) appear, but they are used only to point to specific results, not to justify the review's central premise by appeal to the authors' own authority. The paper also explicitly flags the one genuinely model-dependent ingredient in eclipsing-binary analysis—limb-darkening coefficients derived from stellar atmosphere models—rather than concealing it. Thus there is no self-definitional step, no fitted-input-called-prediction step, and no load-bearing self-citation chain. The correct finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new parameters or entities; it is a review that relies on standard astrophysical assumptions and published data.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The components of V454 Aurigae are coeval.
    Used in Sec. 2 to infer stellar ages from the binary; authors call it 'a reasonable assumption'.
  • domain assumption V454 Aurigae has solar metallicity (Z=0.014).
    Used in Sec. 2 for the MIST model comparison; the paper notes abundances would improve constraints.
  • domain assumption Stellar evolution models (MIST and PARSEC) are accurate enough for age and radius comparisons.
    The paper compares observed radii and temperatures to these models in Figs. 2 and 3; if the models were wrong, the illustrative conclusions would change.
  • domain assumption The multiplicity fractions cited from the literature (50% solar-like, up to 100% massive) are accurate.
    The abstract and introduction rely on these statistics to establish the importance of binaries.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The importance of binary stars." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NDB5T7SK

@misc{pith2026241118470,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The importance of binary stars},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NDB5T7SK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.18470}
}
read the original abstract

Stars are mostly found in binary and multiple systems, as at least 50% of all solar-like stars have companions - a fraction that goes up to 100% for the most massive stars. Moreover, a large fraction of them will interact in some way or another over the course of their lives. Such interactions can, and often will, alter the structure and evolution of both components in the system. This will, in turn, lead to the production of exotic objects whose existence cannot be explained by standard single star evolution models, including gravitational wave progenitors, blue stragglers, symbiotic and barium stars, novae, and supernovae. More generally, binary stars prove crucial in many aspects, ranging from cultural ones, to constraining models of stellar evolution, star formation, and even, possibly, of gravity itself. They also provide a quasi-model independent way to determine stellar masses, radii, and luminosities. We here provide a brief summary of the importance of binary stars.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.18470 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Starry Night Over the Rhone by Vincent Van Gogh, showing the Big Dipper and the binary system Mizar and Alcor. Oil on canvas, Mus´ee d’Orsay, Paris. found in the series of papers by J.-L. Halbwachs and colleagues (for example, Halbwachs et al., 2020) and those by John Southworth in The Observatory. In Southworth (2024), he determines the masses and radii of the component solar￾like stars of the binary system V454 Au… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison between MIST models for solar metallicity stars of masses corresponding to the components of V454 Aurigae and the parameters determined by Southworth (2024). The top panel shows the radius as a function of age, while the bottom panel concerns the effective temperature as a function of age. In each panel, the lower set of curves correspond to the less massive component, the upper ones to the more massive o… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparison between MIST and PARSEC evolutionary tracks for a solar mass star of Z=0.014. The panels show the same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Some stars form as binaries, as shown in this rendering based on ALMA data. Credit: ALMA (ESO/NAOJ/NRAO), Alves et al. (2019) 3. Binary stars constraint theories Many stars form as binaries ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The relation between the ratio of the critical semi-major axis, ac, for stable S-orbits in a binary system to the binary separation, ab, as a function of (1 − µ) 1/3 , where µ is the mass fraction of the secondary component in the binary system, µ = m2/(m1 + m2). Figur…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T

    Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., et al., Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger. 2016, Physical Review Letters, 116, 061102, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.061102 2016

  2. [2]

    P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T

    Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., et al., GW170817: Observation of Gravita- tional Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral. 2017, Physical Review Letters, 119, 161101, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.161101 2017

  3. [3]

    D., Acernese, F., et al., Population of Merging Compact Bina- ries Inferred Using Gravitational Waves through GWTC-3

    Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Acernese, F., et al., Population of Merging Compact Bina- ries Inferred Using Gravitational Waves through GWTC-3. 2023, Physical Review X, 13, 011048, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.13.011048

    doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.011048 2023

  4. [4]

    O., Caselli, P., Girart, J

    Alves, F. O., Caselli, P., Girart, J. M., et al., Gas flow and accretion via spiral stream- ers and circumstellar disks in a young binary protostar. 2019,Science, 366, 90, DOI: 10.1126/science.aaw3491

    doi:10.1126/science.aaw3491 2019

  5. [5]

    A., et al., Stellar Multiplicity Meets Stellar Evolution and Metallicity: The APOGEE View

    Badenes, C., Mazzola, C., Thompson, T. A., et al., Stellar Multiplicity Meets Stellar Evolution and Metallicity: The APOGEE View. 2018, Astrophysical Journal, 854, 147, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa765

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaa765 2018

  6. [6]

    2024, Monthly Notices of the RAS, 527, 4573, DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stad3393

    Banik, I., Pittordis, C., Sutherland, W., et al., Strong constraints on the gravitational law from Gaia DR3 wide binaries. 2024, Monthly Notices of the RAS, 527, 4573, DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stad3393

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3393 2024

  7. [7]

    A., Carpenter, J

    Barenfeld, S. A., Carpenter, J. M., Sargent, A. I., et al., The Effect of Binarity on Circumstellar Disk Evolution. 2019, Astrophysical Journal, 878, 45, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1e50

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab1e50 2019

  8. [8]

    & Boffin, H

    Beccari, G. & Boffin, H. M. J. 2019, The Impact of Binary Stars on Stellar Evolution, Cambridge Astrophysics (Cambridge University Press)

    work page 2019

Show all 79 references
  1. [9]

    R., Dietrich, J., Burgasser, A

    Bedin, L. R., Dietrich, J., Burgasser, A. J., et al., HST astrometry of the closest brown dwarfs-II. Improved parameters and constraints on a third body. 2024, Astronomis- che Nachrichten, 345, e20230158, DOI: 10.1002/asna.20230158

    2024 doi

  2. [10]

    R., Pourbaix, D., Apai, D., et al., Hubble Space Telescope astrometry of the closest brown dwarf binary system - I

    Bedin, L. R., Pourbaix, D., Apai, D., et al., Hubble Space Telescope astrometry of the closest brown dwarf binary system - I. Overview and improved orbit. 2017, Monthly Notices of the RAS, 470, 1140, DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx1177

    2017 doi

  3. [11]

    W., Stellar Companions to TESS Objects of Interest: A Test of Planet-Companion Alignment

    Behmard, A., Dai, F., & Howard, A. W., Stellar Companions to TESS Objects of Interest: A Test of Planet-Companion Alignment. 2022, Astronomical Journal, 163, 160, DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac53a7 The importance of binary stars 11

    2022 doi

  4. [12]

    W., On the variations of the proper motions of Procyon and Sirius

    Bessel, F. W., On the variations of the proper motions of Procyon and Sirius. 1844, Monthly Notices of the RAS, 6, 136, DOI: 10.1093/mnras/6.11.136

    doi

  5. [13]

    V., Dreizler, S., et al., Two planets orbiting the recently formed post-common envelope binary NN Serpentis

    Beuermann, K., Hessman, F. V., Dreizler, S., et al., Two planets orbiting the recently formed post-common envelope binary NN Serpentis. 2010, Astronomy and Astro- physics, 521, L60, DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015472

    2010 doi

  6. [14]

    Boffin, H. M. J., Cerf, N., & Paulus, G., Statistical analysis of a sample of spectroscopic binaries containing late-type giants. 1993, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 271, 125

    1993

  7. [15]

    Boffin, H. M. J. & Pourbaix, D., The mass-ratio distribution of spectroscopic binaries along the main sequence. 2019, Mem. Societa Astronomica Italiana, 90, 359

    2019

  8. [16]

    Boffin, H. M. J., Pourbaix, D., Muˇ zi´ c, K., et al., Possible astrometric discovery of a substellar companion to the closest binary brown dwarf system WISE J104915.57- 531906.1. 2014, Astronomy and Astrophysics , 561, L4, DOI: 10.1051/0004- 6361/201322975

    2014 doi

  9. [17]

    Boffin, H. M. J. & Trimble, V., My companion is bigger than your companion! 2020, The Observatory, 140, 1, DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1910.07793

    2020 doi arXiv

  10. [18]

    E., Schaefer, G

    Bond, H. E., Schaefer, G. H., Gilliland, R. L., et al., The Sirius System and Its As- trophysical Puzzles: Hubble Space Telescope and Ground-based Astrometry. 2017, Astrophysical Journal, 840, 70, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6af8

    2017 doi

  11. [19]

    2023, Astrophysical Journal, 952, 128, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ace101

    Chae, K.-H., Breakdown of the Newton-Einstein Standard Gravity at Low Acceleration in Internal Dynamics of Wide Binary Stars. 2023, Astrophysical Journal, 952, 128, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ace101

    2023 doi

  12. [20]

    2024a, Astrophysical Journal, 972, 186, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad61e9

    Chae, K.-H., Measurements of the Low-acceleration Gravitational Anomaly from the Normalized Velocity Profile of Gaia Wide Binary Stars and Statistical Testing of Newtonian and Milgromian Theories. 2024a, Astrophysical Journal, 972, 186, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad61e9

    doi

  13. [21]

    2024b, Astro- physical Journal, 960, 114, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0ed5

    Chae, K.-H., Robust Evidence for the Breakdown of Standard Gravity at Low Accel- eration from Statistically Pure Binaries Free of Hidden Companions. 2024b, Astro- physical Journal, 960, 114, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0ed5

    doi

  14. [22]

    Childs, A. C. & Martin, R. G., Terrestrial planet formation in a circumbinary disc around a coplanar binary. 2021, Monthly Notices of the RAS, 507, 3461, DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab2419

    2021 doi

  15. [23]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.10379, DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2405.10379

    Christian, S., Vanderburg, A., Becker, J., et al., Wide Binary Orbits are Preferentially Aligned with the Orbits of Small Planets, but Probably Not Hot Jupiters. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.10379, DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2405.10379

    2024 doi arXiv

  16. [24]

    2022, Astronomical Journal, 163, 207, DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac517f

    Christian, S., Vanderburg, A., Becker, J., et al., A Possible Alignment Between the Or- bits of Planetary Systems and their Visual Binary Companions. 2022, Astronomical Journal, 163, 207, DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac517f

    2022 doi

  17. [25]

    VRIJHK, SDSS ugriz, Gaia, Kepler, TESS, and CHEOPS photometric systems. II. PHOENIX spherically symmetric stellar atmosphere models. 2023, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 674, A63, DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346478 12 H. M. J. Boffin & D. Jones

    2023 doi

  18. [26]

    A., Influence of selection criteria on the interpretation of rotational be- haviour of wide-binary star systems

    Cookson, S. A., Influence of selection criteria on the interpretation of rotational be- haviour of wide-binary star systems. 2024, Monthly Notices of the RAS, 533, 110, DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stae1820 Duchˆ ene, G., Planet Formation in Binary Systems: A Separation-Dependent Mech- ...

    2024 doi

  19. [27]

    J., Kraus, A

    Dupuy, T. J., Kraus, A. L., Kratter, K. M., et al., Orbital architectures of planet- hosting binaries - II. Low mutual inclinations between planetary and stellar orbits. 2022, Monthly Notices of the RAS, 512, 648, DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac306

    2022 doi

  20. [28]

    Eggenberger, A., Udry, S., & Mayor, M., Statistical properties of exoplanets. III. Planet properties and stellar multiplicity. 2004, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 417, 353, DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20034164

    2004 doi

  21. [29]

    2019, Monthly Notices of the RAS, 482, 5018, DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty3109

    El-Badry, K., The geometric challenge of testing gravity with wide binaries. 2019, Monthly Notices of the RAS, 482, 5018, DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty3109

    2019 doi

  22. [30]

    2024, New Astronomy Review, 98, 101694, DOI: 10.1016/j.newar.2024.101694

    El-Badry, K., Gaia’s binary star renaissance. 2024, New Astronomy Review, 98, 101694, DOI: 10.1016/j.newar.2024.101694

    2024

  23. [31]

    R., Schaefer, G

    Evans, N. R., Schaefer, G. H., Gallenne, A., et al., The Orbit and Dynamical Mass of Polaris: Observations with the CHARA Array. 2024, Astrophysical Journal, 971, 190, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5e7a

    2024 doi

  24. [32]

    P., Barnes, R., Graham, D

    Fleming, D. P., Barnes, R., Graham, D. E., Luger, R., & Quinn, T. R., On the Lack of Circumbinary Planets Orbiting Isolated Binary Stars. 2018, Astrophysical Journal, 858, 86, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aabd38

    2018 doi

  25. [33]

    2019, Monthly Notices of the RAS, 485, 4967, DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz671

    Fontanive, C., Rice, K., Bonavita, M., et al., A high binary fraction for the most massive close-in giant planets and brown dwarf desert members. 2019, Monthly Notices of the RAS, 485, 4967, DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz671

    2019 doi

  26. [34]

    W., & Tian, H., Precise Ages of Field Stars from White Dwarf Companions

    Fouesneau, M., Rix, H.-W., von Hippel, T., Hogg, D. W., & Tian, H., Precise Ages of Field Stars from White Dwarf Companions. 2019, Astrophysical Journal, 870, 9, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaee74

    2019 doi

  27. [35]

    Freire, P. C. C. & Wex, N., Gravity experiments with radio pulsars. 2024, Living Reviews in Relativity, 27, 5, DOI: 10.1007/s41114-024-00051-y

    2024 doi

  28. [36]

    Fuhrmann, K., Chini, R., Kaderhandt, L., & Chen, Z., Multiplicity among Solar-type Stars. 2017, Astrophysical Journal, 836, 139, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/139 Gaia Collaboration, Panuzzo, P., Mazeh, T., et al., Discovery of a dormant 33 solar- mass black hole in pre-release...

    2017 doi

  29. [37]

    R., et al., A Geometrical 1% Distance to the Short-period Binary Cepheid V1334 Cygni

    Gallenne, A., Kervella, P., Evans, N. R., et al., A Geometrical 1% Distance to the Short-period Binary Cepheid V1334 Cygni. 2018, Astrophysical Journal, 867, 121, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aae373 Gonz´ alez-Payo, J., Caballero, J. A., Gorgas, J., et al., Multiplicity of stars wit...

    2018 doi

  30. [38]

    L., Kiefer, F., Lebreton, Y., et al., Masses of the components of SB2 binaries observed with Gaia - V

    Halbwachs, J. L., Kiefer, F., Lebreton, Y., et al., Masses of the components of SB2 binaries observed with Gaia - V. Accurate SB2 orbits for 10 binaries and masses of the components of 5 binaries. 2020, Monthly Notices of the RAS, 496, 1355, DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa1571

    2020 doi

  31. [39]

    M., Hermes, J

    Heintz, T. M., Hermes, J. J., El-Badry, K., et al., Testing White Dwarf Age Estimates Using Wide Double White Dwarf Binaries from Gaia EDR3. 2022, Astrophysical Journal, 934, 148, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac78d9

    2022 doi

  32. [40]

    M., Hermes, J

    Heintz, T. M., Hermes, J. J., Tremblay, P. E., et al., A Test of Spectroscopic Age Estimates of White Dwarfs Using Wide WD+WD Binaries. 2024, Astrophysical Journal, 969, 68, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad479b

    2024 doi

  33. [41]

    D., On the orbital and radial motions of alpha Centauri

    Heintz, W. D., On the orbital and radial motions of alpha Centauri. 1982, The Obser- vatory, 102, 42

    1982

  34. [42]

    2023, Monthly Notices of the RAS, 525, 1401, DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stad2306

    Hernandez, X., Internal kinematics of Gaia DR3 wide binaries: anomalous behaviour in the low acceleration regime. 2023, Monthly Notices of the RAS, 525, 1401, DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stad2306

    2023 doi

  35. [43]

    A., & Allen, C., Wide binaries as a critical test of classical gravity

    Hernandez, X., Jim´ enez, M. A., & Allen, C., Wide binaries as a critical test of classical gravity. 2012, European Physical Journal C, 72, 1884, DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052- 012-1884-6

    2012 doi

  36. [44]

    & Kroupa, P., A recent confirmation of the wide binary gravitational anomaly

    Hernandez, X. & Kroupa, P., A recent confirmation of the wide binary gravitational anomaly. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.17178, DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2410.17178

    2024 doi arXiv

  37. [45]

    C., Ba¸ st¨ urk,¨O., Southworth, J., et al., Absolute dimensions of solar-type eclipsing binaries

    Hinse, T. C., Ba¸ st¨ urk,¨O., Southworth, J., et al., Absolute dimensions of solar-type eclipsing binaries. NY Hya: A test for magnetic stellar evolution models. 2024, As- tronomy and Astrophysics, 687, A116, DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244066

    2024 doi

  38. [46]

    A., Littlefair, S

    Hollands, M. A., Littlefair, S. P., & Parsons, S. G., Measuring the initial-final mass relation using wide double white dwarf binaries from Gaia DR3. 2024, Monthly Notices of the RAS, 527, 9061, DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stad3729

    2024 doi

  39. [47]

    Holman, M. J. & Wiegert, P. A., Long-Term Stability of Planets in Binary Systems. 1999, Astronomical Journal, 117, 621, DOI: 10.1086/300695

    1999 doi

  40. [48]

    Hulse, R. A. & Taylor, J. H., Discovery of a pulsar in a binary system. 1975, Astro- physical Journal, Letters, 195, L51, DOI: 10.1086/181708

    1975 doi

  41. [49]

    S., Dynamical masses across the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram

    Hwang, H.-C., Ting, Y.-S., Cheng, S., & Speagle, J. S., Dynamical masses across the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram. 2024, Monthly Notices of the RAS, 528, 4272, DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stae297

    2024 doi

  42. [50]

    2024, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 690, A144, DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450531

    Iorio, G., Torniamenti, S., Mapelli, M., et al., The boring history of Gaia BH3 from isolated binary evolution. 2024, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 690, A144, DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450531

    2024 doi

  43. [51]

    L., Hummel, W., Covino, S., et al., RX J0806.3+1527: A double degenerate binary with the shortest known orbital period (321s)

    Israel, G. L., Hummel, W., Covino, S., et al., RX J0806.3+1527: A double degenerate binary with the shortest known orbital period (321s). 2002, Astronomy and Astro- physics, 386, L13, DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20020314

    2002 doi

  44. [52]

    2015, Astrophysical Journal, 799, 147, DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/799/2/147 14 H

    Jang-Condell, H., On the Likelihood of Planet Formation in Close Binaries. 2015, Astrophysical Journal, 799, 147, DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/799/2/147 14 H. M. J. Boffin & D. Jones

    2015 doi

  45. [53]

    L., Ireland, M

    Kraus, A. L., Ireland, M. J., Hillenbrand, L. A., & Martinache, F., The Role of Multi- plicity in Disk Evolution and Planet Formation. 2012, Astrophysical Journal, 745, 19, DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/745/1/19

    2012 doi

  46. [54]

    L., Ireland, M

    Kraus, A. L., Ireland, M. J., Huber, D., Mann, A. W., & Dupuy, T. J., The Impact of Stellar Multiplicity on Planetary Systems. I. The Ruinous Influence of Close Binary Companions. 2016, Astronomical Journal, 152, 8, DOI: 10.3847/0004-6256/152/1/8

    2016 doi

  47. [55]

    V., Howell, S

    Lester, K. V., Howell, S. B., Matson, R. A., et al., Visual Orbits and Alignments of Planet-hosting Binary Systems. 2023, Astronomical Journal, 166, 166, DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/acf563

    2023 doi

  48. [56]

    A., Williams, K

    Liebert, J., Fontaine, G., Young, P. A., Williams, K. A., & Arnett, D., The Age and Stellar Parameters of the Procyon Binary System. 2013, Astrophysical Journal, 769, 7, DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/769/1/7

    2013 doi

  49. [57]

    L., Discovery of a Binary Brown Dwarf at 2 pc from the Sun

    Luhman, K. L., Discovery of a Binary Brown Dwarf at 2 pc from the Sun. 2013, Astrophysical Journal, Letters, 767, L1, DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/767/1/L1

    2013 doi

  50. [58]

    E., Kenworthy, M

    Mamajek, E. E., Kenworthy, M. A., Hinz, P. M., & Meyer, M. R., Discovery of a Faint Companion to Alcor Using MMT/AO 5 µm Imaging. 2010, Astronomical Journal, 139, 919, DOI: 10.1088/0004-6256/139/3/919

    2010 doi

  51. [59]

    W., Dupuy, T., Kraus, A

    Mann, A. W., Dupuy, T., Kraus, A. L., et al., How to Constrain Your M Dwarf. II. The Mass-Luminosity-Metallicity Relation from 0.075 to 0.70 Solar Masses. 2019, Astrophysical Journal, 871, 63, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf3bc Mar ´ ın Pina, D., Rastello, S., Gieles, M., et al., D...

    2019 doi

  52. [60]

    R., Parsons, S

    Marsh, T. R., Parsons, S. G., Bours, M. C. P., et al., The planets around NN Serpentis: still there. 2014, Monthly Notices of the RAS, 437, 475, DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt1903

    2014 doi

  53. [61]

    N., Badenes, C., Moe, M., et al., The close binary fraction as a function of stellar parameters in APOGEE: a strong anticorrelation with α abundances

    Mazzola, C. N., Badenes, C., Moe, M., et al., The close binary fraction as a function of stellar parameters in APOGEE: a strong anticorrelation with α abundances. 2020, Monthly Notices of the RAS, 499, 1607, DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa2859

    2020 doi

  54. [62]

    2024, Bulletin de la Societe Royale des Sciences de Liege, 93, 170, DOI: 10.25518/0037-9565.11641

    Merle, T., Dancing with the Stars: a Review on Stellar Multiplicity. 2024, Bulletin de la Societe Royale des Sciences de Liege, 93, 170, DOI: 10.25518/0037-9565.11641

    2024

  55. [63]

    & Kratter, K

    Moe, M. & Kratter, K. M., Impact of binary stars on planet statistics - I. Planet occurrence rates and trends with stellar mass. 2021, Monthly Notices of the RAS, 507, 3593, DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab2328

    2021 doi

  56. [64]

    2022, Astrophysical Jour- nal, 929, 26, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5ac0

    Moss, A., von Hippel, T., Robinson, E., et al., Improving White Dwarfs as Chronome- ters with Gaia Parallaxes and Spectroscopic Metallicities. 2022, Astrophysical Jour- nal, 929, 26, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5ac0

    2022 doi

  57. [65]

    R., Hollands, M., et al., Two decades of optical timing of the shortest-period binary star system HM Cancri

    Munday, J., Marsh, T. R., Hollands, M., et al., Two decades of optical timing of the shortest-period binary star system HM Cancri. 2023, Monthly Notices of the RAS, 518, 5123, DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac3385 ¨Ozd¨ onmez, A., Er, H., & Nasiroglu, I., Investigation on the orbital pe...

    2023 doi

  58. [66]

    B., Espinoza-Arancibia, F., et al., Cepheids with giant com- panions

    Pilecki, B., Thompson, I. B., Espinoza-Arancibia, F., et al., Cepheids with giant com- panions. II. Spectroscopic confirmation of nine new double-lined binary systems composed of two Cepheids. 2024, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 686, A263, DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202349138

    2024 doi

  59. [67]

    & Sutherland, W., Testing modified gravity with wide binaries in Gaia DR2

    Pittordis, C. & Sutherland, W., Testing modified gravity with wide binaries in Gaia DR2. 2019, Monthly Notices of the RAS, 488, 4740, DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz1898

    2019 doi

  60. [68]

    & Boffin, H

    Pourbaix, D. & Boffin, H. M. J., Parallax and masses of α Centauri revisited. 2016, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 586, A90, DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527859

    2016 doi

  61. [69]

    2020, Astronomical Journal, 159, 80, DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab64fa

    Quarles, B., Li, G., Kostov, V., & Haghighipour, N., Orbital Stability of Circum- stellar Planets in Binary Systems. 2020, Astronomical Journal, 159, 80, DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab64fa

    2020 doi

  62. [71]

    2021, Monthly Notices of the RAS, 505, 3165, DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab1559

    Rebassa-Mansergas, A., Maldonado, J., Raddi, R., et al., Constraining the solar neigh- bourhood age-metallicity relation from white dwarf-main sequence binaries. 2021, Monthly Notices of the RAS, 505, 3165, DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab1559

    2021 doi

  63. [72]

    Roelofs, G. H. A., Rau, A., Marsh, T. R., et al., Spectroscopic Evidence for a 5.4 Minute Orbital Period in HM Cancri. 2010, Astrophysical Journal, Letters, 711, L138, DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/711/2/L138

    2010 doi

  64. [73]

    2020, Astrophysical Journal, 903, 141, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc074

    Simonetti, P., Vladilo, G., Silva, L., & Sozzetti, A., Statistical Properties of Habit- able Zones in Stellar Binary Systems. 2020, Astrophysical Journal, 903, 141, DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc074

    2020 doi

  65. [74]

    Paper XIX

    Southworth, J., Rediscussion of eclipsing binaries. Paper XIX. The long-period solar-type system V454 Aurigae. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.19443, DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.19443

    2024 doi arXiv

  66. [76]

    Taylor, J. H. & Weisberg, J. M., A new test of general relativity - Gravitational radi- ation and the binary pulsar PSR 1913+16. 1982, Astrophysical Journal, 253, 908, DOI: 10.1086/159690

    1913 doi

  67. [77]

    & Moe, M., Formation of close binaries by disc fragmentation and mi- gration, and its statistical modelling

    Tokovinin, A. & Moe, M., Formation of close binaries by disc fragmentation and mi- gration, and its statistical modelling. 2020, Monthly Notices of the RAS, 491, 5158, DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz3299 16 H. M. J. Boffin & D. Jones

    2020 doi

  68. [78]

    A., Xie, J.-W., & Ciardi, D

    Wang, J., Fischer, D. A., Xie, J.-W., & Ciardi, D. R., Influence of Stellar Multiplicity on Planet Formation. II. Planets are Less Common in Multiple-star Systems with Separations Smaller than 1500 AU. 2014, Astrophysical Journal, 791, 111, DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/791/2/111

    2014 doi

  69. [79]

    Whitworth, A. P. & Lomax, O., Are the majority of Sun-like stars single? 2015, Monthly Notices of the RAS, 448, 1761, DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv093

    2015 doi

  70. [80]

    D., Kiman, R., et al., Dynamical masses and ages of Sirius- like systems

    Zhang, H., Brandt, T. D., Kiman, R., et al., Dynamical masses and ages of Sirius- like systems. 2023a, Monthly Notices of the RAS, 524, 695, DOI: 10.1093/mn- ras/stad1849

    doi

  71. [81]

    P., Dupuy, T

    Zhang, Z., Bowler, B. P., Dupuy, T. J., et al., The McDonald Accelerating Stars Sur- vey: Architecture of the Ancient Five-planet Host System Kepler-444. 2023b, As- tronomical Journal, 165, 73, DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/aca88c

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.