Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 8 minor 42 references

Chemical pressure tuning of competing orders in $\textrm{Ba}_{1-x}\textrm{Ca}_{x}\textrm{Ni}_{2}\textrm{As}_{2}$

T0 review · 2 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Adding calcium raises Tc of BaNi2As2 from 0.6 K to 1 K.

desk verdict First Ca-doping study of BaNi2As2 with a credible homogeneous-regime phase diagram, but the headline 1 K Tc rests on an inhomogeneous sample and should not be presented as a single bulk value. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.18536 v1 pith:ACKA5ZTP submitted 2024-11-27 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.str-el

F. Henssler , K. Willa , M. Frachet , T. Lacmann , D. A. Chaney , M. Merz , A.-A. Haghighirad , M. Le Tacon This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-concond-mat.str-el
keywords BaNi2As2chemicalpressurechargedensitywavetriclinicstructuraltransitionsuperconductivitycalciumsubstitutionstackingfaultsweak-couplingBCS
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that substituting a few percent of barium with calcium in BaNi2As2 compresses the crystal lattice in a way that closely resembles hydrostatic pressure, and that this chemical pressure systematically suppresses the triclinic structural transition and its associated commensurate charge-density wave while raising the superconducting transition temperature from about 0.6 K to 1.0 K. A reader should care because BaNi2As2 is a structural analogue of the iron-based parent compound BaFe2As2, and the competition between charge order and superconductivity in this family is a testing ground for how unconventional superconductivity emerges. The paper shows that calcium is far more efficient than strontium for this tuning: only about 3.5% calcium is needed to lower the structural transition to 120 K, where roughly 30% strontium would be required. Thermodynamic measurements indicate that superconductivity remains weak-coupling BCS throughout the whole investigated range. The study also documents a concrete limit: above x about 0.04, crystals develop stacking faults, so the complete suppression of the structural instability could not be reached in this work.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Ba1−xCaxNi2As2 solid solution, specifically calcium acting as a smaller isovalent cation on the barium site. The mechanism that carries the argument is chemical pressure: substituting calcium compresses the tetragonal unit cell in both the a and c directions and shifts the arsenic height, producing a lattice state close to that of moderate hydrostatic pressure, and the paper calibrates this by comparing the substitution dependence of the structural transition, the charge-density-wave wavevector, and the superconducting temperature against hydrostatic-pressure data on the parent compound.

What would settle it

Grow homogeneous Ba1−xCaxNi2As2 crystals with x between about 0.12 and 0.20, for example by high-pressure synthesis, and measure whether the triclinic transition temperature extrapolates to zero near the predicted 15-20% calcium; if TS instead saturates or stays finite while the lattice keeps shrinking, the chemical-pressure explanation fails. As a complementary check, apply hydrostatic pressure to a fixed calcium-doped crystal and see whether the shifts in TS and Tc match the equivalence derived from substitution, since a mismatch would show that calcium does more than compress the lattice.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that isovalent calcium substitution on the barium site of Ba1−xCaxNi2As2 behaves as an effective chemical pressure: it compresses both a and c lattice parameters, increases the arsenic height zAs, and leaves the NiAs layers essentially unchanged, while suppressing the first-order triclinic (P-1) transition and the commensurate charge-density wave with wavevector q = (1/3 0 -1/3). At 3% calcium the unit-cell compression equals roughly 0.5 GPa of hydrostatic pressure, and at 8% calcium the incommensurate charge-density-wave ordering vector shifts from 0.281 to 0.285, comparable to about 1.5 GPa. The superconducting transition temperature rises systematically from 0.6 K to 1.0 K over this range, with the specific-heat jump remaining at the weak-coupling BCS value of about 1.4. The paper reports the first phase diagram of Ba1−xCaxNi2As2 and argues that, because the substitution is isovalent and works at much lower concentration than strontium, the suppression of the triclinic and charge-density-wave orders is rooted in lattice compression rather than charge doping or cationic disorder.

Load-bearing premise

The results assume that the calcium concentration measured by EDX on small crystal terraces equals the bulk composition of each measured crystal, including the x > 0.04 samples that the paper itself describes as inhomogeneous and stacking-faulted.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If correct, the triclinic and commensurate charge-density-wave phase should be fully suppressed by roughly 15-20% calcium, and reaching that range should reveal whether the superconducting transition jumps toward the higher temperatures seen in phosphorus- and strontium-substituted samples.
  • Because calcium suppresses the structural transition at much lower substitution than strontium, it provides a cleaner chemical-pressure axis for studying the interplay of charge order, superconductivity, and possible electronic nematicity at lower disorder levels.
  • The weak-coupling BCS character of the superconductivity, evidenced by the specific-heat ratio near 1.4 and the upper-critical-field slope around -0.211 T/K, implies that the increase in Tc observed here does not require a change of pairing mechanism.
  • The incommensurate charge-density-wave onset temperature barely moves while the triclinic transition is strongly suppressed, so the two orders respond differently to chemical pressure, a distinction that any theory linking them must reproduce.
  • The stacking faults that appear for x above about 0.04 make the c-axis lattice parameter unreliable in that regime, so the role of the c/a ratio in tuning the electronic phase must be tested by other means, such as pressure studies on homogeneous samples.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension suggested by this result: measure elastoresistivity on homogeneous calcium-doped crystals; the paper's analogy with phosphorus- and strontium-substituted samples predicts a large B1g response if nematic fluctuations accompany the suppression, but that measurement is not reported here.
  • If calcium substitution truly reproduces hydrostatic pressure, then applying further hydrostatic pressure to a calcium-doped crystal should not create any new charge-density-wave phase; observing one would indicate substitution-specific electronic or disorder effects beyond simple lattice compression.
  • The stacking-fault regime above x about 0.04, where the NiAs layers remain intact, could be used as a separate probe of c-axis coherence versus in-plane electronic behavior, since the faults disorder the stacking without destroying the layers.
  • Because 3% calcium is calibrated to about 0.5 GPa and 8% calcium shifts the incommensurate wavevector comparably to about 1.5 GPa, a combined substitution-plus-pressure experiment could build a quantitative equivalence map and test whether calcium affects the electronic structure beyond its lattice effect.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 8 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports the growth and characterization of single crystals of Ba1−xCaxNi2As2 (0 ≤ x ≲ 0.1) using x-ray diffraction, diffuse x-ray scattering, electrical transport, and specific heat measurements. The authors find that Ca substitution compresses the lattice, suppresses the triclinic structural transition and the associated commensurate CDW, slightly increases the superconducting transition temperature from about 0.6 K to about 1.0 K, and leaves the superconductivity in the weak-coupling BCS regime. A comparison with hydrostatic pressure data suggests that 3% Ca produces a lattice-parameter change equivalent to roughly 0.5 GPa, while the suppression of TS is stronger than in pressure. The paper identifies a homogeneity limit at x ≈ 0.04, above which stacking faults and Ca inhomogeneities prevent reliable c-axis structural refinement and cause broadened superconducting transitions.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper provides a new chemical-pressure axis for the BaNi2As2 family, with an efficient suppression of the triclinic/CDW state and a modest enhancement of Tc, and it offers a quantitative benchmark against hydrostatic pressure. The study's strengths are its multi-technique approach (thermodynamic and transport signatures for TS and Tc, direct measurement of CDW wavevectors, and lattice parameters), the internal consistency of the data in the homogeneous regime x ≤ 0.04, and the explicit identification of the stacking-fault limit. The main weakness is that the high-x portion of the phase diagram, including the headline Tc = 1.0 K point, is built on samples the paper itself describes as inhomogeneous; this needs to be addressed before the central claims can be accepted as stated.

major comments (2)
  1. [§III.D, Table III, Fig. 7] The single Tc = 1.0 K value assigned to the x = 0.095 sample is inconsistent with the authors' own description in Section III.D, where the transition 'could in fact be interpreted as two sharp superconducting transitions with respective Tc of about 0.7 K and 1.0 K' because of an inhomogeneous Ca distribution. Since Table III and Fig. 7 plot this as one point, and the abstract and summary emphasize the increase from 0.6 K to 1.0 K, this is a load-bearing issue for the central claim of Tc enhancement. The authors should either perform and show a two-transition decomposition (e.g., two entropy-conserving constructions), plot both Tc values or a range in Fig. 7, or clearly mark the x > 0.04 points as inhomogeneous and exclude them from the main Tc(x) trend. The abstract and summary must be revised accordingly so that the 1.0 K value is not presented as a homogeneous-compound property.
  2. [§III.A, Figs. 1(c) and 2] The x-axis of the phase diagram for x > 0.04 relies on EDX compositions measured on small terraces (50×25 to 100×50 µm²) with 1–2% terrace-to-terrace variations, on crystals that are described as inhomogeneous and stacking-faulted. For the x = 0.095 point, a 1–2% absolute variation corresponds to a 10–20% relative uncertainty in x, which directly affects the reported TS(x), Tc(x), and the comparison with Sr-substitution in Section IV. Because the c-axis lattice parameter is explicitly stated to be unreliable in this regime (Fig. 2), there is no bulk-sensitive cross-check of the composition. The authors should provide a bulk composition verification (e.g., refined Ca occupancy from XRD or averaged EDX maps with a stated standard deviation over the entire crystal) or restrict the quantitative phase diagram to the homogeneous regime x ≤ 0.04 and move the x > 0.04 data to a clearly labeled, provisional status.
minor comments (8)
  1. [§III.A, first paragraph] The word 'larely' should be 'largely'.
  2. [Fig. 6(a) caption] The symbol 'puckB' appears to be a formatting error; it should read something like '3p_uc k_B' or '3Nk_B' (with N the number of atoms per formula unit).
  3. [§IV, first paragraph] The word 'incommensureate' should be 'incommensurate'.
  4. [Fig. 5(a), Table II, Table III] The sample compositions are given as 9.9%, 9.4%, and 9.5% (x = 0.095) in different places; please use a single consistent label for each batch.
  5. [Fig. 7] The label 'Tc (x20)' is not explained; please state in the caption that the Tc values are magnified by a factor of 20 for visibility.
  6. [§III.B] The criterion for the I-CDW transition (correlation length reaching ξK ~ 250 Å and ξL ~ 120 Å) should be stated explicitly, as it is not a thermodynamic definition and may affect the comparison to pressure.
  7. [Abstract] The phrase 'the substitution range in which the crystals remain homogeneous is limited as for concentrations x ≥ 0.04' reads as a run-on; suggest 'limited; for concentrations x ≥ 0.04, intense diffuse x-ray scattering indicates...'.
  8. [Fig. 7] The space-group label 'P1' should be written as 'P\bar{1}' to denote the triclinic structure.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: all central claims are direct measurements or conventional data reductions against external benchmarks.

full rationale

This paper is an experimental characterization study, not a derivation-based paper. The central quantities (TS, Tc, C-CDW and I-CDW wavevectors, lattice parameters, Sommerfeld coefficient, Debye temperature, and upper critical field slope) are obtained from x-ray diffraction, diffuse scattering, transport, and specific-heat measurements. The Tc values are read from specific-heat discontinuities using an entropy-conserving construction; the Hc2 estimate uses a standard Werthamer-Helfand-Hohenberg formula with a measured slope, and the gamma and Theta_D values come from a conventional low-temperature polynomial fit. None of these quantities is defined in terms of a predicted output, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The comparison of 3% Ca substitution to roughly 0.5 GPa of hydrostatic pressure uses lattice-parameter changes from prior published pressure work as an external benchmark, not as an input to fit the present data. The paper's self-citations to earlier BaNi2As2 studies provide background and context, but the new claims about Ca substitution do not reduce to those citations. The paper itself explicitly flags the limitations of the x>0.04 samples (inhomogeneous Ca distribution, stacking faults, and the ambiguity between one broad Tc and two sharp transitions), which is a correctness or robustness concern, not a circularity concern. No uniqueness theorem, ansatz-smuggling citation, or renaming of a known result appears in the argument. The derivation chain, such as it is, is self-contained against direct measurements and external calibrations.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new theoretical entities, particles, or forces are postulated. The fit parameters used (gamma, beta, alpha, Hc2 slope) are standard extracted quantities from heat capacity and magnetocaloric analysis and do not constitute free parameters that the central claim depends on. The main implicit assumptions are about sample stoichiometry and phase identification, which are standard for this type of experimental study.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption EDX measurements on small surface terraces give the bulk Ca concentration x used for every x-axis point.
    Section III.A and Fig. 1(c); x values are quoted to three decimal places and used for all phase diagram coordinates, including samples with known inhomogeneity for x > 0.04.
  • domain assumption The first-order transition at TS is the same triclinic/C-CDW transition as in undoped BaNi2As2, identified from prior literature.
    Section III.C and Refs. [6-9,16,18]; the phase assignment is not re-derived in this paper and is used to interpret the transport and specific heat anomalies.
  • standard math The specific-heat jump analysis uses the weak-coupling BCS value Delta C/(gamma Tc) about 1.43 as the reference.
    Section III.D; used to conclude that superconductivity remains weak-coupling BCS in the investigated substitution range.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Chemical pressure tuning of competing orders in $\textrm{Ba}_{1-x}\textrm{Ca}_{x}\textrm{Ni}_{2}\textrm{As}_{2}$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ACKA5ZTP

@misc{pith2026241118536,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Chemical pressure tuning of competing orders in $\textrmBa_1-x\textrmCa_x\textrmNi_2\textrmAs_2$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ACKA5ZTP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.18536}
}
abstract

$\mathrm{Ba}\mathrm{Ni}_{2}\mathrm{As}_{2}$, a structural-analogue to the iron-based parent compound $\mathrm{Ba}\mathrm{Fe}_{2}\mathrm{As}_{2}$, offers a unique platform to study the interplay between superconductivity, charge density waves and, possibly, electronic nematicity. Here, we report on the growth and characterization of $\mathrm{Ba}_{1-x}\mathrm{Ca}_{x}\mathrm{Ni}_{2}\mathrm{As}_{2}$ single crystals with $0 \leq x \leq 0.1$, using a combination of x-ray diffraction, diffuse x-ray scattering, heat capacity, and electronic transport measurements. Our results demonstrate that calcium substitution affects the structural, electronic and thermodynamic properties of $\mathrm{Ba}\mathrm{Ni}_{2}\mathrm{As}_{2}$ in a way that is strongly reminiscent of moderate hydrostatic pressures albeit with marked differences. In particular Ca-substitution efficiently suppresses both the triclinic structural transition and the associated commensurate charge density wave formation, while increasing the superconducting transition temperature. We found that the substitution range in which the crystals remain homogeneous is limited as for concentrations $x \geq 0.04$ intense diffuse x-ray scattering indicates the formation of stacking faults, which, despite the preserved integrity of the NiAs layers, prevents investigation up to concentrations at which the chemical pressure would completely suppress the structural instability.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.18536 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Typical Ba [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Substitution dependence of the lattice parame [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Reciprocal space planes measured with diffuse x [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Linecuts of the diffuse signal across [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Temperature dependence of the in-plane electri [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) Temperature dependence of the specific heat of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Phase diagram of Ba [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    R. M. Fernandes, P. P. Orth, and J. Schmalian, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 10, 133 (2019)

    2019

  2. [2]

    D. N. Basov, R. D. Averitt, and D. Hsieh, Nature Mate- rials 16, 1077 (2017)

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Keimer, S

    B. Keimer, S. A. Kivelson, M. R. Norman, S. Uchida, and J. Zaanen, Nature 518, 179 (2015)

    2015

  4. [4]

    G. R. Stewart, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1589 (2011)

    2011

  5. [5]

    Ronning, N

    F. Ronning, N. Kurita, E. D. Bauer, B. L. Scott, T. Park, T. Klimczuk, R. Movshovich, and J. D. Thompson, Jour- nal of Physics: Condensed Matter 20, 342203 (2008)

    work page 2008

  6. [6]

    S. Lee, G. de la Pe˜ na, S. X. L. Sun, M. Mitrano, Y. Fang, H. Jang, J.-S. Lee, C. Eckberg, D. Campbell, J. Collini, J. Paglione, F. M. F. de Groot, and P. Abbamonte, Phys- ical Review Letters 122, 147601 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    S. Lee, J. Collini, S. X. L. Sun, M. Mitrano, X. Guo, C. Eckberg, J. Paglione, E. Fradkin, and P. Abbamonte, Physical Review Letters 127, 027602 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    M. Merz, L. Wang, T. Wolf, P. Nagel, C. Meingast, and S. Schuppler, Physical Review B 104, 184509 (2021)

    work page 2021

Show all 42 references
  1. [9]

    Meingast, A

    C. Meingast, A. Shukla, L. Wang, R. Heid, F. Hardy, M. Frachet, K. Willa, T. Lacmann, M. Le Tacon, M. Merz, A.-A. Haghighirad, and T. Wolf, Physical Re- view B 106, 144507 (2022)

    2022

  2. [10]

    Y. Yao, R. Willa, T. Lacmann, S.-M. Souliou, M. Frachet, K. Willa, M. Merz, F. Weber, C. Meingast, R. Heid, A.- A. Haghighirad, J. Schmalian, and M. Le Tacon, Nature Communications 13, 4535 (2022)

    2022

  3. [11]

    Lacmann, A.-A

    T. Lacmann, A.-A. Haghighirad, S.-M. Souliou, M. Merz, G. Garbarino, K. Glazyrin, R. Heid, and M. Le Tacon, Physical Review B 108, 224115 (2023)

    2023

  4. [12]

    S. M. Souliou, T. Lacmann, R. Heid, C. Meingast, M. Frachet, L. Paolasini, A. A. Haghighirad, M. Merz, A. Bosak, and M. Le Tacon, Physical Review Letters129, 247602 (2022). 9

    2022

  5. [13]

    Y. Song, S. Wu, X. Chen, Y. He, H. Uchiyama, B. Li, S. Cao, J. Guo, G. Cao, and R. Birgeneau, Physical Re- view B 107, L041113 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    Kurita, F

    N. Kurita, F. Ronning, Y. Tokiwa, E. D. Bauer, A. Subedi, D. J. Singh, J. D. Thompson, and R. Movshovich, Physical Review Letters 102, 147004 (2009)

    2009

  7. [15]

    Collini, D

    J. Collini, D. J. Campbell, D. Sneed, P. Saraf, C. Eck- berg, J. Jeffries, N. Butch, and J. Paglione, Physical Re- view B 108, 205103 (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    K. Kudo, M. Takasuga, Y. Okamoto, Z. Hiroi, and M. No- hara, Phys Rev Lett 109, 097002 (2012)

    2012

  9. [17]

    Eckberg, D

    C. Eckberg, D. J. Campbell, T. Metz, J. Collini, H. Hodovanets, T. Drye, P. Zavalij, M. H. Christensen, R. M. Fernandes, S. Lee, P. Abbamonte, J. W. Lynn, and J. Paglione, Nature Physics 16, 346 (2020)

    2020

  10. [18]

    Frachet, P

    M. Frachet, P. Wiecki, T. Lacmann, S. M. Souliou, K. Willa, C. Meingast, M. Merz, A. A. Haghighirad, M. Le Tacon, and A. E. B¨ ohmer, npj Quantum Mate- rials 7, 115 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    Subedi and D

    A. Subedi and D. J. Singh, Physical Review B 78, 132511 (2008)

    2008

  12. [20]

    L. Song, J. Si, T. Fennell, U. Stuhr, G. Deng, J. Wang, J. Liu, L. Hao, H. Luo, M. Liu, S. Meng, and S. Li, Physical Review B 109, 104518 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    T. Noda, K. Kudo, M. Takasuga, M. Nohara, T. Sug- imoto, D. Ootsuki, M. Kobayashi, K. Horiba, K. Ono, H. Kumigashira, A. Fujimori, N. L. Saini, and T. Mi- zokawa, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 86, 064708 (2017)

    2017

  14. [22]

    Kreyssig, M

    A. Kreyssig, M. A. Green, Y. Lee, G. D. Samolyuk, P. Za- jdel, J. W. Lynn, S. L. Bud 'ko, M. S. Torikachvili, N. Ni, S. Nandi, J. B. Le˜ ao, S. J. Poulton, D. N. Argyriou, B. N. Harmon, R. J. McQueeney, P. C. Canfield, and A. I. Goldman, Physical Review B 78, 184517 (2008)

    2008

  15. [23]

    Mewis and A

    A. Mewis and A. Distler, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Naturforschung B 35, 391 (1980)

    1980

  16. [24]

    Rigaku Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Yarnton, Oxfordshire, E 2015 CrysAlis PRO (2015)

    2015

  17. [25]

    G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallographica Section A: Foun- dations of Crystallography 64, 112 (2008)

    2008

  18. [26]

    all available averaged symmetry-independent reflec- tions (I > 2σ) have been included for the respective RT refinements in space group I4/mmm. The refinements converged quite well and show very good weighted reli- ability factors ( wR2) typically between 4 and 8 %, de- pending...

  19. [27]

    Girard, T

    A. Girard, T. Nguyen-Thanh, S. Souliou, M. Stekiel, W. Morgenroth, L. Paolasini, A. Minelli, D. Gambetti, B. Winkler, and A. Bosak, Journal of Synchrotron Radi- ation 26, 272 (2019)

    2019

  20. [28]

    Petˇ r ´ ıˇ cek, M

    V. Petˇ r ´ ıˇ cek, M. Duˇ sek, and L. Palatinus, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Kristallographie - Crystalline Materials 229, 345 (2014)

    2014

  21. [29]

    P. L. Dulong and A.-T. Petit, Recherches sur quelques points importans de la theorie de la chaleur (1819)

  22. [30]

    A. S. Sefat, M. A. McGuire, R. Jin, B. C. Sales, D. Man- drus, F. Ronning, E. D. Bauer, and Y. Mozharivskyj, Phys. Rev. B 79, 094508 (2009)

    2009

  23. [31]

    Bardeen, L

    J. Bardeen, L. N. Cooper, and J. R. Schrieffer, Physical Review 108, 1175 (1957)

    1957

  24. [32]

    Willa, R

    K. Willa, R. Willa, K. W. Song, G. D. Gu, J. A. Schneeloch, R. Zhong, A. E. Koshelev, W.-K. Kwok, and U. Welp, Physical Review B 98, 184509 (2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    Eckberg, L

    C. Eckberg, L. Wang, H. Hodovanets, H. Kim, D. J. Campbell, P. Zavalij, P. Piccoli, and J. Paglione, Phys. Rev. B 97, 224505 (2018)

    2018

  26. [34]

    K. Kudo, M. Takasuga, and M. Nohara, (2017), arXiv:1704.04854 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    2017 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Willa, R

    K. Willa, R. Willa, J. K. Bao, A. E. Koshelev, D. Y. Chung, M. G. Kanatzidis, W. K. Kwok, and U. Welp, Physical Review B 99, 180502 (2019)

    2019

  28. [36]

    Hardy, L

    F. Hardy, L. Doussoulin, T. Klein, M. He, A. Demuer, R. Willa, K. Willa, A. A. Haghighirad, T. Wolf, M. Merz, C. Meingast, and C. Marcenat, Physical Review Research 2, 033319 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    N. R. Werthamer, E. Helfand, and P. C. Hohenberg, Physical Review 147, 295 (1966)

    1966

  30. [38]

    Prozorov, V

    R. Prozorov, V. G. Kogan, M. Ko´ nczykowski, and M. A. Tanatar, Physical Review B 109, 024506 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    H. Kito, H. Eisaki, and A. Iyo, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 77, 063707 (2008)

    2008

  32. [40]

    T. Park, H. Lee, E. D. Bauer, J. D. Thompson, and F. Ronning, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 200, 012155 (2010)

    2010

  33. [42]

    Tomioka, T

    Y. Tomioka, T. Ito, H. Kito, A. Iyo, H. Eisaki, S. Ishida, M. Nakajima, and S.-i. Uchida, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 77, 136 (2008)

    2008

  34. [4946]

    acknowledges support from the Swiss Na- tional Science Foundation through the Postdoc.Mobility program

    K.W. acknowledges support from the Swiss Na- tional Science Foundation through the Postdoc.Mobility program. M.F. acknowledges funding from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation and the Young Investigator Group preparatory program of the Karlsruhe Institute for Technology

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.