Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 24 references

Randomization of a Laser Wavefront by the Turbulent Gas-Puff Z-Pinch Plasma Column

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A gas-puff z-pinch plasma column becomes turbulent before stagnation, and laser speckle is the first direct evidence.

desk verdict A genuine new observation—laser speckle from a gas-puff z-pinch—that likely indicates sub-mm density fluctuations, but the claim of 'first direct evidence of turbulence' needs more than one statistically clean shot and a wider simulation scan. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.18732 v2 pith:LYNAF4LV submitted 2024-11-27 physics.plasm-ph

A. Rososhek , E. S. Lavine , B. R. Kusse , W. M. Potter , D. A. Hammer This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.plasm-ph
keywords gas-puffz-pinchturbulenceimagingrefractometerlaserspecklespatialcoherencebeampropagationmethodelectrondensityfluctuationshigh-energy-densityplasma
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first direct experimental evidence, backed by numerical simulation, that a gas-puff z-pinch plasma column becomes turbulent during implosion. Using an imaging refractometer on a pulsed-power generator, the authors observe that a laser beam passing through the pinch develops a speckle pattern and loses spatial coherence shortly before stagnation, with the spatial autocorrelation length dropping from over 0.5 mm to roughly 60 micrometers. Because the refractometer signal is set by the line integral of the electron density gradient, the randomized wavefront implies randomly distributed density fluctuations. Beam Propagation Method simulations of artificial density distributions with different fluctuation scales reproduce the experimental trends only when the density fluctuations are random and sub-millimeter in scale, whereas smooth or shockwave-like distributions do not. The paper concludes that the flow is likely turbulent almost throughout the implosion, with the average scale of density fluctuations shrinking towards stagnation.

What carries the argument

The key mechanism is wavefront randomization by random electron density fluctuations, observed with an imaging refractometer and modeled with a Beam Propagation Method (BPM) code. The refractometer performs a one-dimensional optical Fourier transform of the laser field, so deflection angles proportional to the line integral of the density gradient appear as vertical spread in the image, while the horizontal extent of the features encodes the spatial coherence length of the transmitted field. Individual plane waves composing the TEM00 beam acquire random phase shifts along different optical paths, producing laser speckle whose first-order statistics (negative exponential intensity distribution) and second-order statistics (autocorrelation decay) quantify the randomness. The BPM code solves the paraxial wave equation through a cylindrical shell with imposed refractive-index distributions and produces synthetic refractometer images for comparison.

What would settle it

A concrete test would be to run the Beam Propagation Method with a deterministic array of discrete plasma filaments or magneto-Rayleigh-Taylor bubble stacks, matching the line-integrated density gradients of the measured shots, and check whether the synthetic images also develop speckle-like statistics and sub-100 micrometer correlation lengths; if they do, the inference that only random density fluctuations can explain the data would be falsified. A complementary check is a quantitative scan over fluctuation scales and amplitudes to see whether the measured autocorrelation decay and speckle contrast can be matched to a specific spectrum.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that laser speckle generation in an imaging refractometer constitutes direct experimental evidence of turbulence in gas-puff z-pinch implosions. The measured intensity statistics of the speckled field follow the shifted negative exponential distribution expected for polarized speckle, with speckle contrast close to unity, and the autocorrelation length decreases as the column shrinks. The authors argue that this wavefront randomization can only be produced by random sub-millimeter electron density fluctuations, because simulations using shockwave or smooth density structures produce only a narrow profile around the k = 0 line, while random structures with 5 mm, 1 mm, and 100 micrometer scales reproduce the observed trends of vertical widening and decreasing spatial coherence.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion rests on the premise that only random, sub-millimeter density fluctuations can produce the observed speckle pattern and shrinking correlation length; the supporting simulations test only three random scales and a few deterministic profiles, with qualitative comparison and no uncertainty estimates.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the turbulence conclusion holds, modeling gas-puff z-pinch stagnation must include random density fluctuations rather than only smooth sheath profiles, which will affect inferred density and emission properties.
  • The implication that flow may be turbulent almost from the start of the current means the onset of turbulence is not tied to stagnation, so early-time fluctuating structure must be included in instability evolution studies.
  • The observed decrease in fluctuation scale towards stagnation suggests a turbulent cascade shrinking with compression, and higher-resolution measurements could quantify the fluctuation power spectrum.
  • The combination of imaging refractometry and speckle statistics provides a turbulence diagnostic applicable to other high-energy-density plasma experiments.
  • The paper's qualitative agreement with 5 mm fluctuations at early times suggests turbulence may be present earlier than previously suspected, motivating dedicated early-implosion studies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If this conclusion holds, the measured autocorrelation decay could be inverted into a density-fluctuation power spectrum, turning a qualitative identification into a quantitative turbulence measurement.
  • The paper's early-time consistency with large-scale random fluctuations suggests turbulence may begin almost with current onset; a dedicated campaign varying gas species and drive parameters could test whether onset timing depends on them.
  • The data imply that the visible magneto-Rayleigh-Taylor edge bubbles are not the main wavefront randomizer, pointing to unresolved interior sheath dynamics as the likely site of the turbulent cascade.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports imaging refractometer measurements of a 532 nm probe beam passing through a Neon gas-puff z-pinch plasma on the COBRA generator. At a late pre-stagnation time (shot #7009) the measured 1D power spectrum of the transmitted field shows a speckle-like pattern whose intensity histogram is consistent with a negative-exponential distribution (χ²≈0.9), a speckle contrast near unity, and a short transverse autocorrelation length; earlier/larger-column shots show longer correlation. A Beam Propagation Method (BPM) code propagates a TEM00 beam through artificial density distributions with random fluctuations at 5 mm, 1 mm, and 100 µm scales and produces synthetic refractometer images that reproduce the qualitative trends of decreasing autocorrelation length and increasing vertical spread. The authors conclude that sub-mm random density fluctuations are present and that gas-puff z-pinch implosions are almost always turbulent, providing what they describe as the first direct experimental evidence of turbulence in these implosions.

Significance. If the central claim were fully established, this would be a valuable contribution: it would add a new optical diagnostic signature of plasma turbulence in z-pinches and complement earlier indirect inferences from spectroscopy and Thomson scattering. The paper is commendable for using a forward BPM model, for attempting quantitative speckle statistics on the experimental image, and for openly acknowledging several limitations (single-shot fit, low BPM resolution, and the future dependence of synthetic data on the assumed probability density function). The main weaknesses are that the 'only random fluctuations can explain the data' claim rests on a narrow set of simulations and on one shot, and that the comparison between experiment and simulation is qualitative rather than quantitative. These issues are load-bearing because the paper's strongest claim is the uniqueness of the turbulent interpretation.

major comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 3 and paragraph following Eq. (2)] Only shot #7009 (the blue curve in Fig. 3) has a clear linear region consistent with the negative-exponential speckle distribution; the green and red curves do not. The abstract and conclusion nevertheless state that the intensity distribution of the speckles measured during different shot campaigns follows the speckle statistics satisfactorily. Because the negative-exponential histogram is the most direct evidence that the field is fully randomized, the 'first direct experimental evidence' claim currently rests on a single shot. Additional shots at the same stagnation phase, or a clear statement that the single-shot result is suggestive rather than conclusive, are needed.
  2. [BPM simulation paragraph and Fig. 5] The conclusion that 'only when sub-mm random transverse density variations are present' reproduces the data is an under-tested uniqueness claim. The BPM study varies the average scale of random fluctuations (5 mm, 1 mm, 100 µm) and compares with smooth/shockwave distributions, but it does not simulate deterministic sub-mm structures such as periodic filament arrays, ordered MRT bubble/spike stacks, or vortex sheets. Since the imaging refractometer records a line-integrated, vertically Fourier-transformed signal, deterministic phase objects with comparable accumulated phase variance can in principle produce a broadened vertical spectrum, reduced transverse coherence, and speckle-like intensity statistics. To support the strong 'necessary condition' wording, the authors should include deterministic sub-mm cases and a quantitative comparison metric (e.g., autocorrelation width, vertical spread, or intensity histogram) rather than a qualitative visual match.
  3. [Fig. 1(a,c,e) and timing description] The three experimental images are from different shots (#7007, #7019, #7009) at different times relative to stagnation and under different pulse conditions (long and short COBRA pulses). The inferred trend of decreasing spatial coherence length with decreasing pinch column size is therefore a cross-shot comparison, not a time-resolved evolution of a single implosion. This weakens the claim that the flow is 'almost always turbulent' with the fluctuation scale decreasing 'towards stagnation'; the evidence supports such a trend only if shot-to-shot variability is small, which is not demonstrated.
  4. [BPM input parameters (paragraph after Fig. 5)] The amplitude of the density fluctuations, the power-law exponent of the fluctuation spectrum, and the physical units are not given for the artificial distributions generated by the Timmer–Koenig algorithm. Consequently, the bound 'average density fluctuation scale ... bounded from above at 150 µm' is not quantitatively grounded; the simulated vertical spread and autocorrelation depend on both the fluctuation scale and the fluctuation amplitude/spectral slope. Reporting these parameters and showing sensitivity scans would make the comparison falsifiable.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eq. (2) and Fig. 3 caption] Eq. (2) defines a probability density function, but the text and caption describe it as the probability that the intensity exceeds a threshold I; either call P(I) a probability density or use the survival function exp(-I/<I>).
  2. [Text near Fig. 3] The statement 'χ2 value of ≈ 0.9' should specify whether this is a reduced χ² and give the number of bins or degrees of freedom used in the fit.
  3. [Experimental setup description] The coordinate system is inconsistent: the text says the beam propagates in the r−z plane and later says the propagation direction is parallel to the y-axis; define x, y, and z once and use them consistently.
  4. [Abstract/experimental setup] The phrase 'Neon machine over-mass load' reads awkwardly; consider 'an over-mass Neon load' or similar.
  5. [Opening of analysis section] The statement 'the imaging refractometer signal is proportional to the integral over electron density gradients' is imprecise; Eq. (1) gives the deflection angle, while the measured quantity is a 1D power spectrum of the field. Suggest rephrasing to distinguish the physical deflection from the diagnostic signal.
  6. [Abstract] The abstract's claim that the intensity distribution of the speckles from different shot campaigns 'follows the speckle statistics satisfactorily' is stronger than the body of the paper, which shows a satisfactory fit for only one shot; please align the wording.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity is found: the central inference is a forward-model consistency check using independent density distributions, and the self-citations are only calibration and setup references.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The experimental inference uses the standard line-integral relation (Eq. 1) between electron density gradient and deflection angle, and the conclusion of sub-mm density fluctuations is supported by BPM simulations in which artificial density distributions (generated by the external algorithm of Ref. [16]) are prescribed and propagated forward to synthetic refractometer images. No free parameter is fitted to the experimental refractometer data, and no predicted quantity is defined in terms of the conclusion. The demonstrated trend—decreasing spatial correlation length and growing vertical spread with decreasing fluctuation scale—is therefore a genuine, if qualitative, forward-model comparison rather than a tautology. The self-citations (Refs. [9], [10], [22]) supply prior Thomson-scattering context, the experimental setup, and wavenumber calibration; none of these carries the central turbulence claim. The paper's own admission that future work must examine the dependence on the specific probability density function and that additional research is needed is a limitation on uniqueness of interpretation, not evidence of circularity; the possible existence of untested deterministic sub-mm structures is an under-determination concern, not a circularity concern.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim does not depend on a fitted free parameter in the sense of an inverse fit: the BPM simulation is a forward model. However, the simulation inputs (density fluctuation scale, amplitude, and spectral exponent) are chosen by hand and not fully specified, and the comparison to experiment is qualitative. The key physical axioms are standard assumptions of the refractometer diagnostic and speckle theory; the adequacy of the artificial density distributions is an ad hoc assumption.

free parameters (3)
  • Average spatial scale of density fluctuations in BPM simulation = 5 mm, 1 mm, 100 µm (simulation inputs)
    Three discrete scales were chosen by hand to generate synthetic turbulent refractive index distributions; the comparison to experiment is qualitative and no scale was fitted to the data.
  • Amplitude of density fluctuations in BPM simulation = not specified
    The magnitude of the electron density fluctuations in the artificial distributions is not stated, so the simulation's refraction strength is not fully defined.
  • Power law exponent of density fluctuation spectrum = not specified
    The algorithm from Ref. [16] generates power law noise, but the exponent and other statistical parameters used for the three scales are not given.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The imaging refractometer deflection angle is proportional to the line integral of the electron density gradient (Eq. 1).
    Assumed thin plasma and single scattering; standard for this diagnostic.
  • domain assumption Fully developed speckle statistics (negative exponential intensity distribution) apply to the measured field.
    Required for interpreting the intensity distribution and contrast; the paper notes departures due to background and depolarization.
  • ad hoc to paper The BPM simulation's artificial density distributions adequately represent the plasma turbulence.
    Only three spatial scales and two non-turbulent cases were tested; the authors acknowledge additional research is needed.
  • domain assumption The plasma density fluctuations are stationary during the 150 ps laser pulse.
    Implied by the use of a frozen phase screen; the implosion time scale is much longer.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Randomization of a Laser Wavefront by the Turbulent Gas-Puff Z-Pinch Plasma Column." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LYNAF4LV

@misc{pith2026241118732,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Randomization of a Laser Wavefront by the Turbulent Gas-Puff Z-Pinch Plasma Column},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LYNAF4LV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.18732}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper, we present the first direct experimental evidence supported by numerical modeling of a turbulent plasma column formed during a gas-puff z-pinch implosion generated by COBRA current. Utilizing an imaging refractometer, we show a significant decrease in spatial autocorrelation of the laser field and the appearance of a laser speckle pattern shortly before stagnation. The intensity distribution of the speckles measured during different shot campaigns while employing long and short COBRA pulses follows the speckle statistics satisfactorily. The imaging refractometer signal is proportional to the integral over electron density gradients; hence, the measured phase randomization of the individual plane waves comprising the laser field implies random density distribution. To validate this, the Beam Propagation Method code simulates the laser beam propagation through different artificial density distributions with various average fluctuation scales and generates synthetic imaging refractometer data. The results reproduce similar trends in the experimental data, such as the increasing vertical width for the decreasing average spatial scale of the fluctuations and decreasing spatial correlation length of the laser field. Therefore, during the gas-puff z-pinch implosion process, it is likely that the plasma flow is almost always turbulent with the average spatial scale of the turbulent density fluctuations decreasing towards stagnation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.18732 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The experimentally measured imaging refractometer and shadowgraphy images, including zoom-in regions marked in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a, b, c) - the cross-section of the artificially generated turbulent refractive index profile at half-height of the column. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. The autocorrelation functions calculated for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a, b, c) - The BPM simulated output when the refractive index distributions from Fig. 2 were used as an input. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

24 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    While these estimates are indicative of turbulence, the Reynolds number calculation relies on undisclosed assumptions about plasma viscosity, which depends on plasma transport properties and charge state, rendering it somewhat ambiguous. Further research involving the electron plasma wave feature in the time-resolved and the ion acoustic wave feature in t...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    Ap- proaches to turbulence in high-energy-density experi- ments,

    R. P. Drake, E. C. Harding, and C. C. Kuranz, “Ap- proaches to turbulence in high-energy-density experi- ments,” Physica Scripta 2008, 014022 (2008)

    work page 2008

  3. [3]

    Supersonic plasma turbulence in the laboratory,

    T. G. White, M. T. Oliver, P. Mabey, M. K¨ uhn- Kauffeldt, A. F. A. Bott, L. N. K. D¨ ohl, A. R. Bell, R. Bingham, R. Clarke, J. Foster, G. Giacinti, P. Gra- ham, R. Heathcote, M. Koenig, Y. Kuramitsu, D. Q. Lamb, J. Meinecke, T. Michel, F. Miniati, M. Notley, B. Reville, D. Ryu, S. Sarkar, Y. Sakawa, M. P. Selwood, J. Squire, R. H. H. Scott, P. Tzeferaco...

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Role of collisionality and radiative cooling in supersonic plasma jet collisions of different materials,

    G. W. Collins, J. C. Valenzuela, C. A. Speliotopoulos, N. Aybar, F. Conti, F. N. Beg, P. Tzeferacos, B. Khiar, A. F. A. Bott, and G. Gregori, “Role of collisionality and radiative cooling in supersonic plasma jet collisions of different materials,” Phys. Rev. E , vol. 101, no. 2, p. 023205, 2020

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Validation of a Turbu- lent Kelvin-Helmholtz Shear Layer Model Using a High- Energy-Density OMEGA Laser Experiment,

    O. A. Hurricane, V. A. Smalyuk, K. Raman, O. Schilling, J. F. Hansen, G. Langstaff, D. Martinez, H.-S. Park, B. A. Remington, H. F. Robey, J. A. Greenough, R. Wallace, C. A. Di Stefano, R. P. Drake, D. Marion, C. M. Krauland, C. C. Kuranz, “Validation of a Turbu- lent Kelvin-Helmholtz Shear Layer Model Using a High- Energy-Density OMEGA Laser Experiment,”...

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    A platform for studying the Rayleigh–Taylor and Richt- myer–Meshkov instabilities in a planar geometry at high energy density at the National Ignition Facility,

    S. R. Nagel, K. S. Raman, C. M. Huntington, S. A. Ma- cLaren, P. Wang, M. A. Barrios, T. Baumann, J. D. Bender, L. R. Benedetti, D. M. Doane, S. Felker, P. Fitzsimmons, K. A. Flippo, J. P. Holder, D. N. Kaczala, T. S. Perry, R. M. Seugling, L. Savage, and Y. Zhou, “A platform for studying the Rayleigh–Taylor and Richt- myer–Meshkov instabilities in a plan...

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    Turbulent mixing measurements in the Richtmyer-Meshkov instability,

    C. Weber, N. Haehn, J. Oakley, D. Rothamer, and R. Bonazza, “Turbulent mixing measurements in the Richtmyer-Meshkov instability,” Physics of Fluids 24, 074105 (2012)

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    Turbulent stagnation in aZ-pinch plasma,

    E. Kroupp, E. Stambulchik, A. Starobinets, D. Osin, V. I. Fisher, D. Alumot, Y. Maron, S. Davidovits, N. J. Fisch, A. Fruchtman, “Turbulent stagnation in aZ-pinch plasma,” Phys. Rev. E 97, 013202 (2018)

    work page 2018

Show all 24 references
  1. [9]

    Ion Temperature and Hydrodynamic-Energy Mea- surements in a Z-Pinch Plasma at Stagnation,

    E. Kroupp, D. Osin, A. Starobinets, V. Fisher, V. Bernshtam, L. Weingarten, Y. Maron, I. Uschmann, E. Forster, A. Fisher, M. E. Cuneo, C. Deeney, J. L. Giu- liani, “Ion Temperature and Hydrodynamic-Energy Mea- surements in a Z-Pinch Plasma at Stagnation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 107,...

    2011

  2. [10]

    Applying Thomson scattering to diagnosing turbulent density and velocity fluctuations in a gas-puff z-pinch,

    S. V. R. Rocco, E. S. Lavine, J. T. Banasek, W. M. Potter, D. A. Hammer, “Applying Thomson scattering to diagnosing turbulent density and velocity fluctuations in a gas-puff z-pinch,” Physics of Plasmas 29, 110703 (2022)

    2022

  3. [11]

    Measurements of the imploding plasma sheath in triple-nozzle gas-puff z pinches,

    E. S. Lavine, S. V. R. Rocco, W. M. Potter, J. Angel, E. Freeman, J. T. Banasek, J. Lawson, J. B. Greenly, H. Wilhelm, D. A. Hammer, B. R. Kusse, “Measurements of the imploding plasma sheath in triple-nozzle gas-puff z pinches,” Physics of Plasmas 29, 062702 (2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    An imaging refractometer for density fluctuation mea- surements in high energy density plasmas,

    J. D. Hare, G. C. Burdiak, S. Merlini, J. P. Chittenden, T. Clayson, A. J. Crilly, J. W. D. Halliday, D. R. Rus- sell, R. A. Smith, N. Stuart, L. G. Suttle, S. V. Lebedev, “An imaging refractometer for density fluctuation mea- surements in high energy density plasmas,” Review ...

    2021

  5. [13]

    Okamoto, Fundamentals of optical waveguides (Aca- demic Press, San Diego, USA, 2006)

    K. Okamoto, Fundamentals of optical waveguides (Aca- demic Press, San Diego, USA, 2006)

    2006

  6. [14]

    A 1MA, variable risetime pulse generator for high energy density plasma research,

    J. B. Greenly, J. D. Douglas, D. A. Hammer, B. R. Kusse, S. C. Glidden, H. D. Sanders, “A 1MA, variable risetime pulse generator for high energy density plasma research,” Review of Scientific Instruments 79, 073501 (2008)

    2008

  7. [15]

    W. H. Press, B. P. Flannery, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vet- terling, Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Com- puting (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1986)

    1986

  8. [16]

    Development Of The Zeeman Polarization Spectroscopy System On Cobra,

    J. Angel, “Development Of The Zeeman Polarization Spectroscopy System On Cobra,” Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    On generating power law noise,

    J. Timmer, M. Koenig, “On generating power law noise,” Astronomy and Astrophysics 300, 707 (1995)

    1995

  10. [18]

    J. W. Goodman, Introduction to Fourier Optics (Roberts and Company Publishers, Englewood, CO, 2005)

    2005

  11. [19]

    I. H. Hutchinson, Principles of Plasma Diagnostics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002)

    2002

  12. [20]

    Attainment of Diffraction Limited Reso- lution in Large Telescopes by Fourier Analysing Speckle Patterns in Star Images,

    A. Labeyrie, “Attainment of Diffraction Limited Reso- lution in Large Telescopes by Fourier Analysing Speckle Patterns in Star Images,” Astronomy and Astrophysics 6, 85 (1970)

    1970

  13. [21]

    Statistical Properties of Laser Speckle Patterns,

    J. W. Goodman, “Statistical Properties of Laser Speckle Patterns,” in Laser Speckle and Related Phenomena , edited by J. C. Dainty (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1975), pp. 9–75

    1975

  14. [22]

    Speckle ex- periments in random lasers,

    G. van Soest, F. J. Poelwijk, A. Lagendijk, “Speckle ex- periments in random lasers,” Phys. Rev. E 65, 046603 (2002)

    2002

  15. [23]

    Wavenumber Calibration for an Imaging Refractometer,

    A. Rososhek, B. R. Kusse, W. M. Potter, N. J. Wilson, E. S. Lavine, and D. A. Hammer, “Wavenumber Calibration for an Imaging Refractometer,” arXiv:2408.02660 (2024), https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.02660

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Stewart McKechnie, General theory of light propa- gation and imaging through the atmosphere (Springer, 2016)

    T. Stewart McKechnie, General theory of light propa- gation and imaging through the atmosphere (Springer, 2016)

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.