Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

SynthPop: A New Framework for Synthetic Milky Way Population Generation

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read SynthPop is a modular, open-source Python framework for generating synthetic Milky Way star catalogs along arbitrary sightlines, and the paper validates it against GUMS and Gaia DR3.

desk verdict SynthPop is a genuinely useful open-source framework; the paper is honest about its limits, but the position-generation formula in Sec. 3.3 needs correcting and the GUMS comparison is partly forced. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.18821 v2 pith:YPQ2I76V submitted 2024-11-27 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.GAastro-ph.SR

Jonas Klüter , Macy J. Huston , Abigail Aronica , Samson A. Johnson , Matthew Penny , Marz Newman , Farzaneh Zohrabi , Alison L. Crisp
show 1 more author
Allison Chevis
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.IMastro-ph.GAastro-ph.SR
keywords populationsynthesisMilkyWaymodelssyntheticstellarcatalogsmodularsoftwareisochroneinterpolationextinctionmapsGaiaUniverseModelmicrolensingsimulations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces SynthPop, an open-source, pip-installable Python framework that generates synthetic catalogs of Milky Way stars along any user-selected sightline. Its central claim is that population synthesis can be made modular: density, initial mass function, age, metallicity, kinematics, extinction, isochrone evolution, and post-processing are independent, swappable components configured through JSON files. The paper validates the framework by showing that generated initial properties follow input distributions, stellar densities and kinematics match the Besançon model, and a SynthPop re-implementation of the Gaia Universe Model Snapshot approximately reproduces GUMS and Gaia DR3 luminosity functions. The deliverable is the framework itself, not a new physical model of the Milky Way, and the motivation is to let users adjust or combine model components without recompiling code.

What carries the argument

The central object is the modular generation pipeline: each structural component of the Galaxy is a Population defined by abstract-parent-class modules for density, IMF, age, metallicity, and kinematics, while Evolution, Extinction, and PostProcessing modules handle stellar properties and survey treatment. The mechanism that keeps isochrone interpolation physical is the CharonInterpolator, which remaps initial masses onto equivalent evolutionary phases (terminal-age main sequence, red giant branch tip, and asymptotic giant branch end) of adjacent age and metallicity isochrones before cubic interpolation in mass, preventing spurious bridging between phases. Extinction is handled by separating the three-dimensional extinction map from the extinction law, with a conversion formula that connects map reference wavelengths to arbitrary filters.

What would settle it

Generate a single-age, single-metallicity SynthPop catalog with [Fe/H] = -2.25 and age above 2.5 Gyr, then overlay the post-AGB and white-dwarf cooling regions of the color-magnitude diagram on MIST web-interpolator isochrones; if the catalog shows spurious bridging between the red giant clump and the white dwarf sequence, the admitted post-AGB interpolation failure is confirmed in that regime.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a flexible Galactic population synthesis code can be built entirely in Python with a modular, JSON-configured architecture and still approximately reproduce established models and real data. SynthPop generates each stellar population separately by Poisson-sampling the expected number of stars in distance slices along a cone, then drawing positions, initial masses, ages, metallicities, and velocities from module-specified distributions, and finally interpolating evolutionary properties and photometry from MIST isochrones. Validation shows that the generated stars follow the input IMF, age, and metallicity distributions, that density and kinematics match the implemented Besançon profiles, and that color-magnitude diagrams agree with the MIST web interpolator. In the example comparison, a SynthPop implementation of the Gaia Universe Model Snapshot matches GUMS after renormalizing thick-disk and halo densities to exclude white dwarfs, and both models overpredict Gaia DR3 counts in the outer field by about sixty percent.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the CharonInterpolator's phase-aligned mass remapping yields reliable magnitudes and colors for stars in fast evolutionary phases, and the paper itself concedes that this fails for post-AGB stars at [Fe/H] between -2.5 and -2.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Astronomers can build and compare alternative Milky Way models by changing one JSON-configured component at a time, isolating which density, IMF, extinction, or kinematic choice drives differences in predicted catalogs.
  • SynthPop can feed microlensing survey simulators such as gulls and PyLIMASS with large, deep bulge catalogs, supporting Roman Galactic Bulge Time Domain Survey yield estimates and field optimization.
  • For catalogs of roughly one million stars or fewer, SynthPop is competitive with or faster than Galaxia after a one-time initialization, generating about 50,000 stars per second on a single core.
  • The example use case shows that approximate SynthPop re-implementations of existing models are feasible but require validation and sometimes density renormalization before the output can stand in for the original model.
  • Because SynthPop returns pandas DataFrames and can be imported as a Python module, catalog generation can be embedded in scripts and notebooks rather than run through a web interface.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension suggested by the design is to feed SynthPop catalogs as training sets for stellar classification or for data-driven density maps, since the modular interface would make it straightforward to add a neural density or IMF module.
  • The phase-aligned remapping idea could generalize: if secondary Equivalent Evolutionary Phase anchor points were added, the CharonInterpolator might also handle other isochrone systems or close the post-AGB gap the paper flags as inaccurate.
  • The paper's constant-density-per-slice approximation implies that for very large solid angles or strong density gradients, users should split fields or shrink the slice thickness, a prediction that could be tested by comparing catalog statistics across field-size choices.
  • The custom observer position option could let a user generate absolute-magnitude catalogs from outside the Sun, but because extinction maps are calibrated for the Sun's location, only distance-modulus-free outputs would be safe to trust in that mode.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents SynthPop, an open-source Python framework for generating synthetic Milky Way stellar catalogs along user-specified sightlines. It describes the modular architecture (density profiles, IMF, age and metallicity distributions, isochrone interpolation, extinction, kinematics, post-processing), the generation algorithm, JSON-based configuration, validation tests, a comparison with the Gaia Universe Model Snapshot and Gaia DR3, and a runtime comparison with Galaxia. The stated deliverable is a flexible, scriptable, and reproducible population-synthesis tool rather than a new physical model of the Milky Way.

Significance. If the framework performs as described, it fills a genuine niche: existing tools such as Besançon, TRILEGAL, and Galaxia offer less flexibility or are harder to integrate into Python workflows. The paper's strengths include a clear modular design, public code with pip installation and documentation, validation scripts shipped in the repository, a candid list of known inaccuracies, and a performance comparison against Galaxia. The GUMS comparison and the isochrone tests provide useful end-to-end demonstrations, though as discussed below some of the validation is qualitative or partly post-hoc. For a software-methods paper, the central bar is reproducibility and an accurate description of the implemented algorithm; the manuscript is close to that bar but needs clarification in a few load-bearing places.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.3, Eq. (13)] A direct check shows that the cone center is recovered: Rz(l)Ry(b)(1,0,0)^T = (cos b cos l, cos b sin l, sin b)^T, so the concern that Eq. (13) maps the center of the cone to a mirror latitude is not valid. However, the parameterization is still not a uniform-on-the-cap sampler for finite solid angles. With α = Θ cosΦ and β = Θ sinΦ, the actual angular offset from the sightline is δ = arccos(cos α cos β), which is not equal to Θ, and the induced measure on the sphere is not proportional to sin δ dδ dΦ. Therefore, for large Ω, star positions are not drawn uniformly within the stated cone, which would bias the density profile, extinction, and apparent magnitudes. If the code implements a different, correct sampler, Eq. (13) should be corrected; if it implements Eq. (13), the bias should be quantified and the text's 'solid angle' claim should be qualified.
  2. [Section 7.1, Figs. 7-9] The thick-disk and halo agreement with GUMS is obtained only after applying a renormalization to the SynthPop densities; the non-renormalized SynthPop curves visibly differ in Fig. 7. Because the renormalized model is then adopted for the luminosity-function comparison, the statement that 'SynthPop can produce stellar catalogs that approximately reproduce other models and/or real data' is partly by construction. Please present the renormalization as an explicit model assumption with justification (e.g., a test of the white-dwarf-exclusion hypothesis), or evaluate how sensitive the conclusions in Figs. 8-9 are to this renormalization.
  3. [Section 5, Figs. 2-4] The validation of initial properties, density profiles, and kinematics is entirely qualitative. The text states that generated distributions 'follow' the input distributions, but no quantitative goodness-of-fit statistics are reported. Since the central claim is that the sampler reproduces the user-specified input distributions, please add quantitative metrics (e.g., Kolmogorov-Smirnov or Anderson-Darling tests for masses, ages, and metallicities, and binned residual statistics for the density profiles in Fig. 3). This would make the validation statistically meaningful and reproducible.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.3, Eq. (13)] The symbol Θ is used both for the drawn offset and as an argument in spherical coordinates via α = Θ cosΦ and β = Θ sinΦ; this is confusing. Please rename one of the quantities or state explicitly that Θ is not the final angular offset from the sightline.
  2. [Appendix A, Eq. (A4)] Equation (A4) has an unbalanced parenthesis: 'Ry(arctan(z⊙/x⊙)' is missing a closing parenthesis.
  3. [Fig. 3] The four panels use inconsistent units for the vertical axis (M_sun/kpc^3 for the thin disk, thick disk, and halo, but stars/kpc^3 for the bulge). Please make the units consistent or clearly label each panel.
  4. [Section 5.1] The solid angles used for the four validation sightlines are not stated; the text only says they were chosen to yield ~100,000 stars per population. Listing the actual solid angles would improve reproducibility of the validation.
  5. [Section 8] The statement that 'None of these [inaccuracies] is expected to affect the results significantly' is asserted without support. Given the post-AGB interpolation issue in Section 6.3, a brief quantitative or literature-based justification would be useful.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: SynthPop's central software claim is supported by disclosed internal consistency checks and independent external benchmarks.

full rationale

SynthPop is a software-framework paper: its central claim is that the modular package exists, runs, and can be configured, not that a new physical model of the Milky Way is derived from first principles. The Section 5.1 and 5.2 self-consistency tests check that the inverse-transform samplers, Poisson draws, and coordinate/position generation reproduce the input distributions; these are implementation checks, and the paper does not present them as external validation of any Galactic model. The only comparison in which the model is adjusted, the Section 7.1 GUMS comparison, is transparent: the authors show both the non-normalized and re-normalized density profiles, state the assumption that the GUMS density excludes white dwarfs, and then use the re-normalized model only for that illustrative comparison. The distance-dependent shape of the profiles and the independent Gaia DR3 comparison remain non-forced, and the paper explicitly warns that its implementations of other models are approximations that users should verify. The self-citation to Huston et al. (2025) is simply the code-release pointer and carries no load-bearing argument. External anchors such as the MIST web interpolator, galaxia runtime, and Gaia DR3 provide independent checks. The cone-position formula in Eq. (13) may be a correctness or documentation concern, but it is not an input-output circularity, so it does not affect this verdict.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on four classes of borrowed content: external Galactic models and isochrones, a phase-aligned interpolation scheme introduced here, a density-constant-per-slice approximation, and post-hoc scaling in the GUMS example. The SODC extinction law contributes fitted coefficients. None of these is a violation of the framework's purpose, but they define the difference between what SynthPop computes and what the Milky Way actually is.

free parameters (3)
  • SODC extinction law coefficients (alpha, a1, b1) = alpha = 2.255, a1 = 0.539764, b1 = -0.495567
    Derived in Section 2.5 from the Surot et al. (2020) reddening vector A_Ks = 0.422 E(J-Ks) and continuity with the O'Donnell optical law; these are fitted empirical coefficients, not predictions.
  • Thick disk and halo density renormalization factors = not specified in the paper
    Applied in Section 7.1 to make SynthPop star counts agree with GUMS; the factor is chosen post hoc and is not derived from an independent constraint.
  • Mass loss correction factor a_massloss = population- and isochrone-dependent; four estimation options
    Equation 10 in Section 3.1 uses a_massloss to convert evolved-mass density to star counts; it is estimated numerically from a test population or input by the user, and is not independently measured.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption MIST isochrones provide accurate stellar properties and photometry on the age-metallicity-initial mass grid
    The Evolution module (Section 2.4) interpolates over MIST grids; all output magnitudes and evolved masses inherit MIST's accuracy.
  • domain assumption The published Galactic structure models (Besancon, GUMS, genstars, and others) are accurate enough representations of the Milky Way
    Built-in PopulationDensity, Kinematics, and other modules adopt these published parameterizations (Sections 2.1 and 7.1), so SynthPop catalogs are only as good as these inputs.
  • ad hoc to paper CharonInterpolator's phase-aligned mass remapping preserves stellar evolution continuity across grid points
    Appendix B defines a piecewise-linear remapping between TAMS, RGB, AGB, and final-phase masses; the paper acknowledges post-AGB interpolation remains inaccurate (Section 6.3), so this is a load-bearing modeling assumption for evolved-star photometry.
  • ad hoc to paper Stellar density is constant within each distance slice
    Section 3.3 draws positions assuming constant density inside a slice; Section 6.1 lists this as a known inaccuracy for large fields.
  • ad hoc to paper Mass loss factor a_massloss estimated by the four listed options adequately converts density to star counts
    Section 3.1 uses this factor in Equation 10; the four options trade accuracy against speed and none is exact.
  • domain assumption Extinction maps and laws are valid at the chosen wavelengths and sightlines
    Section 2.5 combines a 2D or 3D map with an extinction law; the paper warns that 2D maps place dust in a single screen, so photometry depends on external map accuracy.
invented entities (2)
  • SODC extinction law
    purpose: Blend the O'Donnell optical extinction law with the Surot et al. infrared reddening vector into one analytic A_lambda/A_V prescription
    Defined in Section 2.5 with coefficients fit to Surot et al. (2020); no independent data or falsifiable prediction outside the fitting sample is provided.
  • CharonInterpolator independent evidence
    purpose: Phase-aligned isochrone interpolator to reduce spurious magnitudes during fast evolutionary phases
    Validated against the MIST web interpolator (Appendix B, Figure 11), an external benchmark, so it has independent support even though it is not a physical entity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of SynthPop: A New Framework for Synthetic Milky Way Population Generation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YPQ2I76V

@misc{pith2026241118821,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: SynthPop: A New Framework for Synthetic Milky Way Population Generation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YPQ2I76V}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.18821}
}
read the original abstract

We present SynthPop, a new open source, modular population synthesis Galactic modeling software to simulate catalogs of Milky Way stars along any sightline outward from the Sun. Motivated by a lack flexibility in existing Galactic models, SynthPop is coded entirely in python, can be run standalone or as an imported module, and is configured by json files that allow different model components to be switched out as desired. We describe the modular code structure, how the population generation process runs, and how to use the code. We also present model validation testing and known inaccuracies, and present an example of the code use, comparing Gaia data and the Gaia Universe Model Snapshot to a SynthPop implementation. The code is available now via GitHub with ReadTheDocs documentation and can be installed via pip.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.18821 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The structure of a SynthPop model’s definition. Two .synthpop conf Configuration json files control the model settings. In these, a Model directory is selected, which contains some number of .popjson json files specifying the Populations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison between input distributions (thick shadowed line) and distributions of generated stars (stepped line) for initial mass functions (left), age (center), and metallicity (right). For IMFs, we show the Chabrier (red), Kroupa (green) and an arbitrary, unphysical piecewise power law (blue) distributions. For age, we show two different uniform distributions (red, green) and a Gaussian (blue). For metallicity, we… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Stellar density for the (left to right) thin disk, thick disk, halo and bulge profiles used in the Besan¸con (A. C. Robin et al. 2003) Model. Each panel shows the stars produced (stepped line) and the specified distribution (shadowed line) along 4 different lines of sight. Large scatter at small and large distances are due to small volumes and/or low densities resulting in very small numbers of stars generated. Note… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Galactic cartesian velocities of SynthPop simulated stars in the (l, b) = (0◦ , 0 ◦ ) field belonging to the 7-10 Gyr thin disk sub-population. We limit the figure to a single population for clarity, as each population has its own velocity dispersions and asymmetric dr…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison between the color-magnitude diagram generated by SynthPop (dots), and MIST web interpolator isochrones (thick shadow) for three different single-age, single-metallicity populations. B and V are shown in absolute Vega magnitudes in the Bessell filter system. …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Runtime comparison of SynthPop and galaxia. The left panel shows total runtime for a range of field sizes, and the right panel shows number of stars generated per second. In the left panel, the SynthPop values for the star generation process along are shown in orange, …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Distance distribution for the bulge, thin disk, thick disk, and halo stellar populations. The density of all stars generated by the SynthPop model we adopt is shown in grey, reflecting the underlying total stellar density distribution for stars with m > 0.1M⊙. The gree…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Color-magnitude diagrams for SynthPop, Gaia Universe Model and Gaia DR3. The top row is in observed magnitudes, and the bottom row is in absolute magnitudes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Luminosity function for the outer (left) and inner (right) Galactic fields. In green, the stars generated by SynthPop are shown. The back line shows the number of stars in Gaia DR3, and red shows the number of stars in the Gaia Universe Model catalog. The bottom panels…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison between the Galactocentric coordinates (black) and Galactic longitude and latitude systems (green). Left: Top view of the Milky Way with Cartesian coordinates. The z-axis points out of the page. Middle: Side view of the Milky Way with Cartesian coordinates.…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Color-magnitude diagram (left), initial mass-magnitude relation (center), and initial mass-mag￾nitude diagram zoomed-in on the post-AGB phase (right) for an isochrone at a grid point metallicity and halfway between grid points in age. The green line shows an isochrone…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Reconstructing the Free-floating Planet Mass Function with the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope

    astro-ph.EP 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A simulation study argues Roman's microlensing survey could reconstruct the free-floating planet mass function from event durations alone, improving sub-Earth abundance constraints by orders of magnitude, but only if ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    p '[7 ! G>rA 89HPsOW dvNj^ƿ׋Zƿ^ &f: ///.?W Ӌڧ5@'nov`[I p; kutv

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt \@twocolumntrue 12pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key o...

    arXiv 2017

  4. [4]

    2019, in Highlights on Spanish Astrophysics X, ed

    Abuter , R., Amorim , A., Anugu , N., et al. 2019, in Highlights on Spanish Astrophysics X, ed. B. Montesinos , A. Asensio Ramos , F. Buitrago , R. Sch \"o del , E. Villaver , S. P \'e rez-Hoyos , & I. Ord \'o \ n ez-Etxeberria , 609--610

    2019

  5. [5]

    Am\^ores, E. B. , Robin, A. C. , & Reyl\'e, C. 2017, title Evolution over time of the Milky Way\' s disc shape, A&A, 602, A67, 10.1051/0004-6361/201628461

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628461 2017

  6. [6]

    P., Tollerud , E

    Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille , T. P., Tollerud , E. J., et al. 2013, title Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy , , 558, A33, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 2013

  7. [7]

    M., Sip o cz , B

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Sip o cz , B. M., et al. 2018, title The Astropy Project: Building an Open-science Project and Status of the v2.0 Core Package , , 156, 123, 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f 2018

  8. [8]

    M., Lim , P

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Lim , P. L., et al. 2022, title The Astropy Project: Sustaining and Growing a Community-oriented Open-source Project and the Latest Major Release (v5.0) of the Core Package , apj, 935, 167, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 2022

Show all 96 references
  1. [9]

    2021, title Gaia EDR3 documentation Chapter 2: Simulated data , , Gaia EDR3 documentation, European Space Agency; Gaia Data Processing and Analysis Consortium

    Babusiaux , C., Masana , E., Robin , A., et al. 2021, title Gaia EDR3 documentation Chapter 2: Simulated data , , Gaia EDR3 documentation, European Space Agency; Gaia Data Processing and Analysis Consortium. Online at https://gea.esac.esa.int/archive/documentation/GEDR3/index....

    2021

  2. [10]

    2024, title Estimating Microlensing Parameters from Observables and Stellar Isochrones with pyLIMASS , , 168, 24, 10.3847/1538-3881/ad4862

    Bachelet , E., Hundertmark , M., & Calchi Novati , S. 2024, title Estimating Microlensing Parameters from Observables and Stellar Isochrones with pyLIMASS , , 168, 24, 10.3847/1538-3881/ad4862

    2024 doi

  3. [11]

    N., & Soneira , R

    Bahcall , J. N., & Soneira , R. M. 1980, title The universe at faint magnitudes. I. Models for the Galaxy and the predicted star counts. , , 44, 73, 10.1086/190685

    1980 doi

  4. [12]

    F., Freeman, K

    Beaulieu, S. F., Freeman, K. C., Kalnajs, A. J., Saha, P., & Zhao, H. 2000, title Dynamics of the Galactic Bulge Using Planetary Nebulae, The Astronomical Journal, 120, 855, 10.1086/301504

    2000 doi

  5. [13]

    C., & Creze , M

    Bienayme , O., Robin , A. C., & Creze , M. 1987, title The mass density in our galaxy. I. A dynamical model constrained by general star counts , , 180, 94

    1987

  6. [14]

    2011, PhD thesis, New York University

    Bovy , J. 2011, PhD thesis, New York University

    2011

  7. [15]

    1982, title Reddenings derived from H I and galaxy counts : accuracy and maps

    Burstein , D., & Heiles , C. 1982, title Reddenings derived from H I and galaxy counts : accuracy and maps. , , 87, 1165, 10.1086/113199

    1982 doi

  8. [16]

    J., & Gould , A

    Cao , L., Mao , S., Nataf , D., Rattenbury , N. J., & Gould , A. 2013, title A new photometric model of the Galactic bar using red clump giants , , 434, 595, 10.1093/mnras/stt1045

    2013 doi

  9. [17]

    A., Clayton , G

    Cardelli , J. A., Clayton , G. C., & Mathis , J. S. 1989, title The Relationship between Infrared, Optical, and Ultraviolet Extinction , , 345, 245, 10.1086/167900

    1989 doi

  10. [18]

    2003, title The Galactic Disk Mass Function: Reconciliation of the Hubble Space Telescope and Nearby Determinations, The Astrophysical Journal, 586, L133, 10.1086/374879

    Chabrier, G. 2003, title The Galactic Disk Mass Function: Reconciliation of the Hubble Space Telescope and Nearby Determinations, The Astrophysical Journal, 586, L133, 10.1086/374879

    2003 doi

  11. [19]

    Q., Liu , X

    Chen , B. Q., Liu , X. W., Yuan , H. B., et al. 2014, title A three-dimensional extinction map of the Galactic anticentre from multiband photometry , , 443, 1192, 10.1093/mnras/stu1192

    2014 doi

  12. [20]

    2019, title An intuitive 3D map of the Galactic warp's precession traced by classical Cepheids , Nature Astronomy, 3, 320, 10.1038/s41550-018-0686-7

    Chen , X., Wang , S., Deng , L., et al. 2019, title An intuitive 3D map of the Galactic warp's precession traced by classical Cepheids , Nature Astronomy, 3, 320, 10.1038/s41550-018-0686-7

    2019 doi

  13. [21]

    2023, title Corrected SFD: A More Accurate Galactic Dust Map with Minimal Extragalactic Contamination , , 958, 118, 10.3847/1538-4357/acf4a1

    Chiang , Y.-K. 2023, title Corrected SFD: A More Accurate Galactic Dust Map with Minimal Extragalactic Contamination , , 958, 118, 10.3847/1538-4357/acf4a1

    2023 doi

  14. [23]

    2016, title Mesa Isochrones and Stellar Tracks (MIST)

    Choi , J., Dotter , A., Conroy , C., et al. 2016, title Mesa Isochrones and Stellar Tracks (MIST). I. Solar-scaled Models , , 823, 102, 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/102

    2016 doi

  15. [24]

    A., Blum , R

    Damineli , A., Almeida , L. A., Blum , R. D., et al. 2016, title Extinction law in the range 0.4-4.8 m and the 8620 A DIB towards the stellar cluster Westerlund 1 , , 463, 2653, 10.1093/mnras/stw2122

    2016 doi

  16. [25]

    Delchambre , L., Bailer-Jones , C. A. L., Bellas-Velidis , I., et al. 2023, title Gaia Data Release 3. Apsis. III. Non-stellar content and source classification , , 674, A31, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243423

    2023 doi

  17. [27]

    2016, title MESA Isochrones and Stellar Tracks (MIST) 0: Methods for the Construction of Stellar Isochrones , , 222, 8, 10.3847/0067-0049/222/1/8

    Dotter , A. 2016, title MESA Isochrones and Stellar Tracks (MIST) 0: Methods for the Construction of Stellar Isochrones , , 222, 8, 10.3847/0067-0049/222/1/8

    2016 doi

  18. [28]

    2024, title A parsec-scale Galactic 3D dust map out to 1.25 kpc from the Sun , , 685, A82, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347628

    Edenhofer , G., Zucker , C., Frank , P., et al. 2024, title A parsec-scale Galactic 3D dust map out to 1.25 kpc from the Sun , , 685, A82, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347628

    2024 doi

  19. [29]

    L., & Massa , D

    Fitzpatrick , E. L., & Massa , D. 2009, title An Analysis of the Shapes of Interstellar Extinction Curves. VI. The Near-IR Extinction Law , , 699, 1209, 10.1088/0004-637X/699/2/1209

    2009 doi

  20. [30]

    Gaia Collaboration , Vallenari , A., Brown , A. G. A., et al. 2023, title Gaia Data Release 3. Summary of the content and survey properties , , 674, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243940

    2023 doi

  21. [31]

    M., Brasseur , C

    Ginsburg , A., Sip o cz , B. M., Brasseur , C. E., et al. 2019, title astroquery: An Astronomical Web-querying Package in Python , , 157, 98, 10.3847/1538-3881/aafc33

    2019 doi

  22. [32]

    2000, title Evolutionary tracks and isochrones for low- and intermediate-mass stars: From 0.15 to 7 M _ sun , and from Z=0.0004 to 0.03 , , 141, 371, 10.1051/aas:2000126

    Girardi , L., Bressan , A., Bertelli , G., & Chiosi , C. 2000, title Evolutionary tracks and isochrones for low- and intermediate-mass stars: From 0.15 to 7 M _ sun , and from Z=0.0004 to 0.03 , , 141, 371, 10.1051/aas:2000126

    2000 doi

  23. [33]

    Girardi , L., Groenewegen , M. A. T., Hatziminaoglou , E., & da Costa , L. 2005, title Star counts in the Galaxy. Simulating from very deep to very shallow photometric surveys with the TRILEGAL code , , 436, 895, 10.1051/0004-6361:20042352

    2005 doi

  24. [34]

    2018, title dustmaps: A Python interface for maps of interstellar dust , The Journal of Open Source Software, 3, 695, 10.21105/joss.00695

    Green , G. 2018, title dustmaps: A Python interface for maps of interstellar dust , The Journal of Open Source Software, 3, 695, 10.21105/joss.00695

    2018 doi

  25. [35]

    M., Schlafly , E., Zucker , C., Speagle , J

    Green , G. M., Schlafly , E., Zucker , C., Speagle , J. S., & Finkbeiner , D. 2019, title A 3D Dust Map Based on Gaia, Pan-STARRS 1, and 2MASS , , 887, 93, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5362

    2019 doi

  26. [36]

    M., Schlafly , E

    Green , G. M., Schlafly , E. F., Finkbeiner , D. P., et al. 2015, title A Three-dimensional Map of Milky Way Dust , , 810, 25, 10.1088/0004-637X/810/1/25

    2015 doi

  27. [37]

    M., Schlafly , E

    Green , G. M., Schlafly , E. F., Finkbeiner , D., et al. 2018, title Galactic reddening in 3D from stellar photometry - an improved map , , 478, 651, 10.1093/mnras/sty1008

    2018 doi

  28. [38]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, title Array programming with NumPy , Nature, 585, 357–362, 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    2020 doi

  29. [39]

    C., & Creze , M

    Haywood , M., Robin , A. C., & Creze , M. 1997, title The evolution of the Milky Way disc. I. Vertical structure and local constraints. , , 320, 428

    1997

  30. [40]

    R., Lam , C

    Hosek , Matthew W., J., Lu , J. R., Lam , C. Y., et al. 2020, title SPISEA: A Python-based Simple Stellar Population Synthesis Code for Star Clusters , , 160, 143, 10.3847/1538-3881/aba533

    2020 doi

  31. [41]

    R., Anderson , J., et al

    Hosek , Matthew W., J., Lu , J. R., Anderson , J., et al. 2018, title The Optical/Near-infrared Extinction Law in Highly Reddened Regions , , 855, 13, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaabbb

    2018 doi

  32. [42]

    J., Klüter, J., Aronica, A., et al

    Huston, M. J., Klüter, J., Aronica, A., et al. 2025, title SynthPop: A New Framework for Synthetic Milky Way Population Generation, , v1.0.0 Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.15128000

    2025 doi

  33. [43]

    A., Penny , M., Gaudi , B

    Johnson , S. A., Penny , M., Gaudi , B. S., et al. 2020, title Predictions of the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope Galactic Exoplanet Survey. II. Free-floating Planet Detection Rates , , 160, 123, 10.3847/1538-3881/aba75b

    2020 doi

  34. [44]

    S., Hansen , B

    Kalirai , J. S., Hansen , B. M. S., Kelson , D. D., et al. 2008, title The Initial-Final Mass Relation: Direct Constraints at the Low-Mass End , , 676, 594, 10.1086/527028

    2008 doi

  35. [45]

    Karim , T., & Mamajek , E. E. 2017, title Revised geometric estimates of the North Galactic Pole and the Sun's height above the Galactic mid-plane , , 465, 472, 10.1093/mnras/stw2772

    2017 doi

  36. [46]

    C., & Marshall , D

    Kerins , E., Robin , A. C., & Marshall , D. J. 2009, title Synthetic microlensing maps of the Galactic bulge , , 396, 1202, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14791.x

    2009

  37. [47]

    King , I. R. 1977, title The Stellar Distribution above the Galactic Plane: An Introduction , Highlights of Astronomy, 4, 41, 10.1017/S1539299600002963

    1977 doi

  38. [48]

    Koshimoto , N., Baba , J., & Bennett , D. P. 2021, title A Parametric Galactic Model toward the Galactic Bulge Based on Gaia and Microlensing Data , , 917, 78, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac07a8

    2021 doi

  39. [49]

    2001, title On the variation of the initial mass function , , 322, 231, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x

    Kroupa , P. 2001, title On the variation of the initial mass function , , 322, 231, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x

    2001

  40. [50]

    L., et al

    Lallement , R., Babusiaux , C., Vergely , J. L., et al. 2019, title Gaia-2MASS 3D maps of Galactic interstellar dust within 3 kpc , , 625, A135, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834695

    2019 doi

  41. [51]

    Y., Lu, J

    Lam, C. Y., Lu, J. R., Hosek, M. W., Dawson, W. A., & Golovich, N. R. 2020, title PopSyCLE: A New Population Synthesis Code for Compact Object Microlensing Events, The Astrophysical Journal, 889, 31, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5fd3

    2020 doi

  42. [52]

    S., & Dor \'e , O

    Lenz , D., Hensley , B. S., & Dor \'e , O. 2017, title A New, Large-scale Map of Interstellar Reddening Derived from H I Emission , , 846, 38, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa84af

    2017 doi

  43. [53]

    J., Robin , A

    Marshall , D. J., Robin , A. C., Reyl \'e , C., Schultheis , M., & Picaud , S. 2006, title Modelling the Galactic interstellar extinction distribution in three dimensions , , 453, 635, 10.1051/0004-6361:20053842

    2006 doi

  44. [54]

    1981, Galactic astronomy

    Mihalas , D., & Binney , J. 1981, Galactic astronomy. Structure and kinematics (W.H. Freeman)

    1981

  45. [55]

    V., Savchenko, S

    Mosenkov, A. V., Savchenko, S. S., Smirnov, A. A., & Camps, P. 2021, title The structure of the Milky Way based on unWISE 3.4 μm integrated photometry , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 507, 5246, 10.1093/mnras/stab2445

    2021 doi

  46. [56]

    K., Bertelli , G., Bressan , A., Chiosi , C., & Lub , J

    Ng , Y. K., Bertelli , G., Bressan , A., Chiosi , C., & Lub , J. 1995, title The Galactic structure towards the Galactic Centre. I. A study of the Palomar-Groningen Field 3. , , 295, 655

    1995

  47. [57]

    Nishiyama , S., Tamura , M., Hatano , H., et al. 2009, title Interstellar Extinction Law Toward the Galactic Center III: J, H, K _ S Bands in the 2MASS and the MKO Systems, and 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, 8.0 m in the Spitzer/IRAC System , , 696, 1407, 10.1088/0004-637X/696/2/1407

    2009 doi

  48. [58]

    O'Donnell , J. E. 1994, title R v-dependent Optical and Near-Ultraviolet Extinction , , 422, 158, 10.1086/173713

    1994 doi

  49. [59]

    2020, title pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas, , latest Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.3509134

    pandas development team, T. 2020, title pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas, , latest Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.3509134

    2020 doi

  50. [60]

    2011, title Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA) , , 192, 3, 10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3

    Paxton , B., Bildsten , L., Dotter , A., et al. 2011, title Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA) , , 192, 3, 10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3

    2011 doi

  51. [61]

    2013, title Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Planets, Oscillations, Rotation, and Massive Stars , , 208, 4, 10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/4

    Paxton , B., Cantiello , M., Arras , P., et al. 2013, title Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Planets, Oscillations, Rotation, and Massive Stars , , 208, 4, 10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/4

    2013 doi

  52. [62]

    2015, title Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Binaries, Pulsations, and Explosions , , 220, 15, 10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/15

    Paxton , B., Marchant , P., Schwab , J., et al. 2015, title Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Binaries, Pulsations, and Explosions , , 220, 15, 10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/15

    2015 doi

  53. [63]

    B., et al

    Paxton , B., Schwab , J., Bauer , E. B., et al. 2018, title Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Convective Boundaries, Element Diffusion, and Massive Star Explosions , , 234, 34, 10.3847/1538-4365/aaa5a8

    2018 doi

  54. [64]

    Paxton , B., Smolec , R., Schwab , J., et al. 2019, title Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Pulsating Variable Stars, Rotation, Convective Boundaries, and Energy Conservation , , 243, 10, 10.3847/1538-4365/ab2241

    2019 doi

  55. [65]

    Peek , J. E. G., & Graves , G. J. 2010, title A Correction to the Standard Galactic Reddening Map: Passive Galaxies as Standard Crayons , , 719, 415, 10.1088/0004-637X/719/1/415

    2010 doi

  56. [66]

    T., Gaudi , B

    Penny , M. T., Gaudi , B. S., Kerins , E., et al. 2019, title Predictions of the WFIRST Microlensing Survey. I. Bound Planet Detection Rates , , 241, 3, 10.3847/1538-4365/aafb69

    2019 doi

  57. [67]

    T., Kerins , E., Rattenbury , N., et al

    Penny , M. T., Kerins , E., Rattenbury , N., et al. 2013, title ExELS: an exoplanet legacy science proposal for the ESA Euclid mission - I. Cold exoplanets , , 434, 2, 10.1093/mnras/stt927

    2013 doi

  58. [68]

    Picaud , S., & Robin , A. C. 2004, title 3D outer bulge structure from near infrared star counts , , 428, 891, 10.1051/0004-6361:20041218

    2004 doi

  59. [69]

    Planck Collaboration , Abergel , A., Ade , P. A. R., et al. 2014, title Planck 2013 results. XI. All-sky model of thermal dust emission , , 571, A11, 10.1051/0004-6361/201323195

    2014 doi

  60. [70]

    2016, title Planck intermediate results

    Planck Collaboration , Aghanim , N., Ashdown , M., et al. 2016, title Planck intermediate results. XLVIII. Disentangling Galactic dust emission and cosmic infrared background anisotropies , , 596, A109, 10.1051/0004-6361/201629022

    2016 doi

  61. [71]

    A., Sukhbold , T., & \"O zel , F

    Raithel , C. A., Sukhbold , T., & \"O zel , F. 2018, title Confronting Models of Massive Star Evolution and Explosions with Remnant Mass Measurements , , 856, 35, 10.3847/1538-4357/aab09b

    2018 doi

  62. [72]

    J., & Brunthaler, A

    Reid, M. J., & Brunthaler, A. 2020, title The Proper Motion of Sagittarius A*. III. The Case for a Supermassive Black Hole, The Astrophysical Journal, 892, 39, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab76cd

    2020 doi

  63. [73]

    1986, title Stellar populations in the milky way: a synthetic model

    Robin , A., & Creze , M. 1986, title Stellar populations in the milky way: a synthetic model. , , 157, 71

    1986

  64. [74]

    C., Reyl \'e , C., & Cr \'e z \'e , M

    Robin , A. C., Reyl \'e , C., & Cr \'e z \'e , M. 2000, title Early galaxy evolution from deep wide field star counts. I. The spheroid density law and mass function , , 359, 103, 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0004109

    2000 doi arXiv

  65. [75]

    C., Reyl \'e , C., Derri \`e re , S., & Picaud , S

    Robin , A. C., Reyl \'e , C., Derri \`e re , S., & Picaud , S. 2003, title A synthetic view on structure and evolution of the Milky Way , , 409, 523, 10.1051/0004-6361:20031117

    2003 doi

  66. [76]

    C., Reyl \'e , C., Derri \`e re , S., & Picaud , S

    Robin , A. C., Reyl \'e , C., Derri \`e re , S., & Picaud , S. 2004, title Erratum: A synthetic view on structure and evolution of the Milky Way , , 416, 157, 10.1051/0004-6361:20040968

    2004 doi

  67. [77]

    C., Luri , X., Reyl \'e , C., et al

    Robin , A. C., Luri , X., Reyl \'e , C., et al. 2012, title Gaia Universe model snapshot. A statistical analysis of the expected contents of the Gaia catalogue , , 543, A100, 10.1051/0004-6361/201118646

    2012 doi

  68. [78]

    Y., Lu , J

    Rose , S., Lam , C. Y., Lu , J. R., et al. 2022, title The Impact of Initial-Final Mass Relations on Black Hole Microlensing , , 941, 116, 10.3847/1538-4357/aca09d

    2022 doi

  69. [79]

    1993, title The alpha -enhanced Isochrones and Their Impact on the FITS to the Galactic Globular Cluster System , , 414, 580, 10.1086/173105

    Salaris , M., Chieffi , A., & Straniero , O. 1993, title The alpha -enhanced Isochrones and Their Impact on the FITS to the Galactic Globular Cluster System , , 414, 580, 10.1086/173105

    1993 doi

  70. [80]

    E., Drew , J

    Sale , S. E., Drew , J. E., Barentsen , G., et al. 2014, title A 3D extinction map of the northern Galactic plane based on IPHAS photometry , , 443, 2907, 10.1093/mnras/stu1090

    2014 doi

  71. [81]

    F., & Finkbeiner , D

    Schlafly , E. F., & Finkbeiner , D. P. 2011, title Measuring Reddening with Sloan Digital Sky Survey Stellar Spectra and Recalibrating SFD , , 737, 103, 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/103

    2011 doi

  72. [82]

    J., Finkbeiner , D

    Schlegel , D. J., Finkbeiner , D. P., & Davis , M. 1998, title Maps of Dust Infrared Emission for Use in Estimation of Reddening and Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation Foregrounds , , 500, 525, 10.1086/305772

    1998 doi

  73. [83]

    2010, title Local kinematics and the local standard of rest , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 403, 1829, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16253.x

    Schönrich, R., Binney, J., & Dehnen, W. 2010, title Local kinematics and the local standard of rest , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 403, 1829, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16253.x

    2010

  74. [84]

    V., & Binney , J

    Sharma , S., Bland-Hawthorn , J., Johnston , K. V., & Binney , J. 2011, title Galaxia: A Code to Generate a Synthetic Survey of the Milky Way , , 730, 3, 10.1088/0004-637X/730/1/3

    2011 doi

  75. [85]

    2011, in Journal of Physics Conference Series, Vol

    Sordo , R., Vallenari , A., Tantalo , R., et al. 2011, in Journal of Physics Conference Series, Vol. 328, Journal of Physics Conference Series (IOP), 012006, 10.1088/1742-6596/328/1/012006

    2011 doi

  76. [86]

    C., Sanders , J

    Sormani , M. C., Sanders , J. L., Fritz , T. K., et al. 2022, title Self-consistent modelling of the Milky Way's nuclear stellar disc , , 512, 1857, 10.1093/mnras/stac639

    2022 doi

  77. [87]

    S., & Gallagher, III, J

    Sparke, L. S., & Gallagher, III, J. S. 2007, Galaxies in the Universe: An Introduction, 2nd edn. (Cambridge University Press)

    2007

  78. [88]

    2015, title The mass spectrum of compact remnants from the PARSEC stellar evolution tracks , , 451, 4086, 10.1093/mnras/stv1161

    Spera , M., Mapelli , M., & Bressan , A. 2015, title The mass spectrum of compact remnants from the PARSEC stellar evolution tracks , , 451, 4086, 10.1093/mnras/stv1161

    2015 doi

  79. [89]

    E., Brown , J

    Sukhbold , T., Ertl , T., Woosley , S. E., Brown , J. M., & Janka , H. T. 2016, title Core-collapse Supernovae from 9 to 120 Solar Masses Based on Neutrino-powered Explosions , , 821, 38, 10.3847/0004-637X/821/1/38

    2016 doi

  80. [90]

    Sukhbold , T., & Woosley , S. E. 2014, title The Compactness of Presupernova Stellar Cores , , 783, 10, 10.1088/0004-637X/783/1/10

    2014 doi

  81. [91]

    A., et al

    Surot , F., Valenti , E., Gonzalez , O. A., et al. 2020, title Mapping the stellar age of the Milky Way bulge with the VVV. III. High-resolution reddening map , , 644, A140, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038346

    2020 doi

  82. [92]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, title SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python , Nature Methods, 17, 261, 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

    2020 doi

  83. [93]

    2019, title The Optical to Mid-infrared Extinction Law Based on the APOGEE, Gaia DR2, Pan-STARRS1, SDSS, APASS, 2MASS, and WISE Surveys , , 877, 116, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1c61

    Wang , S., & Chen , X. 2019, title The Optical to Mid-infrared Extinction Law Based on the APOGEE, Gaia DR2, Pan-STARRS1, SDSS, APASS, 2MASS, and WISE Surveys , , 877, 116, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1c61

    2019 doi

  84. [94]

    2010, in P roceedings of the 9th P ython in S cience C onference, ed

    W es M c K inney. 2010, in P roceedings of the 9th P ython in S cience C onference, ed. S t\'efan van der W alt & J arrod M illman, 56 -- 61, 10.25080/Majora-92bf1922-00a

    2010 doi

  85. [95]

    Woosley , S. E. 2017, title Pulsational Pair-instability Supernovae , , 836, 244, 10.3847/1538-4357/836/2/244

    2017 doi

  86. [96]

    E., Sukhbold , T., & Janka , H

    Woosley , S. E., Sukhbold , T., & Janka , H. T. 2020, title The Birth Function for Black Holes and Neutron Stars in Close Binaries , , 896, 56, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8cc1

    2020 doi

  87. [97]

    2001, title Toward Better Age Estimates for Stellar Populations: The Y ^ 2 Isochrones for Solar Mixture , , 136, 417, 10.1086/321795

    Yi , S., Demarque , P., Kim , Y.-C., et al. 2001, title Toward Better Age Estimates for Stellar Populations: The Y ^ 2 Isochrones for Solar Mixture , , 136, 417, 10.1086/321795

    2001 doi

  88. [98]

    K., Speagle , J

    Zucker , C., Saydjari , A. K., Speagle , J. S., et al. 2025, title A Deep, High-Angular Resolution 3D Dust Map of the Southern Galactic Plane , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.02657, 10.48550/arXiv.2503.02657

    2025 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.