Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 47 references

A consistent light-cone-gauge superstring field theory

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper constructs a map from the Witten-type gauge-invariant superstring field theory to a stubbed light-cone-gauge theory in which the supercurrent-collision divergences of the naive theory are gone, proposing this as the consistent…

desk verdict A serious, mostly careful extension of the bosonic Witten/light-cone map to superstrings, but the central consistency claim rests on Conjecture 2.55, which is explicitly unproved. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.19570 v2 pith:6D5QKKZZ submitted 2024-11-29 hep-th

Yuji Ando , Ryota Fujii , Hiroshi Kunitomo , Jojiro Totsuka-Yoshinaka This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th PACS 11.25.-w11.25.Sq
keywords superstringfieldtheorylight-conegaugeA-infinityalgebrastubbedverticespicture-changingoperatorshomologicalperturbationBRSTcohomologyunitarity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tackles a long-standing mismatch between the two formulations of open superstring field theory: the gauge-invariant Witten-type theory, where unitarity is not manifest, and the light-cone-gauge theory, where unitarity is manifest but the standard vertices diverge when supercurrent insertions collide at interaction points. The authors construct an isomorphism between the covariant and light-cone BRST complexes, use homological perturbation theory to integrate out the unphysical longitudinal fields, and derive effective light-cone vertices from the cyclic $A_\infty$ products of the gauge-invariant theory. A naive extension reproduces the familiar divergent light-cone vertices; the paper's resolution is the stubbed theory, in which the singular locus lies inside higher-order moduli integrals, and an explicit four-Ramond massless vertex is shown to be finite. The stubbed theory is proposed as a consistent light-cone-gauge superstring field theory, and a field redefinition through the Kaku-type theory is argued to connect it to the Witten-type theory, giving a possible proof of unitarity.

What carries the argument

The engine is the similarity transformation $S=e^{-R}$ with $R=\frac{1}{\alpha_0^+}\oint \frac{dz}{2\pi i z}(\tilde{X}^+T^{\mathrm{lc}}+\psi^+G^{\mathrm{lc}})$, an isomorphism between the covariant BRST complex $(H_{\mathrm{cov}},Q)$ and the light-cone complex $(H_{\mathrm{lc}},Q_{\mathrm{lc}})$. Under this map the transverse oscillators become DDF operators (the spectrum-generating operators that build physical states), and the covariant space splits into a physical DDF subspace plus a BRST-trivial longitudinal sector with explicit homotopy operator $Q^+$. Homological perturbation theory then transfers the cyclic $A_\infty$ products of the gauge-invariant theory to effective products on the physical subspace, producing both the original vertices and new vertices from integrating out the longitudinal fields. The final ingredient is stubbing: cutting out the neighborhood of the moduli point where interaction points coincide, pushing that point into quartic and higher vertices, where the paper finds the divergent contributions cancel.

What would settle it

Compute the third-order term in the expansion $S O S^{-1}$ for a weight-$h$ primary superfield and compare it with the transformation predicted by (2.55)-(2.56); a mismatch at order $n\ge 3$ would invalidate the oscillator maps (2.63)-(2.83) used in every effective vertex. Alternatively, compute a complete four-string amplitude in the stubbed theory with one NS and three Ramond external states and test whether the sum of all contour contributions stays finite when the two interaction points $z_+$ and $z_-$ coincide.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a consistent light-cone-gauge open superstring field theory can be obtained from the Witten-type gauge-invariant theory without inventing new interactions: fix the gauge, integrate out all longitudinal fields with homological perturbation theory, and use a similarity transformation $S$ to map the physical subspace. The resulting naive effective vertices are the known light-cone superstring vertices, with a supercurrent $G^\perp$ inserted at each interaction point; they diverge because two such insertions collide on the boundary of moduli space. The paper claims that in the stubbed theory, where every vertex is deformed by cutting out a neighborhood of the collision locus, the singular point is no longer inside cubic vertices; the quartic and higher vertices absorb the divergent contributions and the total amplitude is finite. As evidence, the massless four-Ramond vertex is evaluated and its three contour contributions cancel at the points where $z_+=z_-$. With that in hand, the stubbed light-cone theory is connected back to the Witten-type theory by a Kaku-type field redefinition, and the paper concludes that the Witten-type superstring field theory is unitarily equivalent to a manifestly unitary theory, assuming Conjecture (2.55) on the superconformal action of $S$.

Load-bearing premise

The argument stands on Conjecture (2.55)—that the similarity map $S$ acts as a particular inverse superconformal transformation on operators avoiding $X^+$ and $\psi^+$, a statement checked only to low orders—so if that conjecture fails, the oscillator maps and all effective vertices built from them fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is right, the stubbed theory gives a divergence-free light-cone-gauge open superstring field theory whose effective vertices are obtained by homological transfer from a cyclic $A_\infty$ theory.
  • The Kaku-type field redefinition connects the stubbed Witten-type and Kugo-Zwiebach-type theories, so the Witten-type theory inherits a proof of unitarity from the manifestly unitary light-cone theory.
  • The chain map $S$ supplies a concrete alternative proof of the No-Ghost Theorem for the superstring, including the Ramond sector.
  • The massless cubic vertices of the derived theory coincide with the known light-cone gauge Yang-Mills interactions, so the low-energy limit is unchanged.
  • In the stubbed theory the former collision-point divergences cancel between transverse propagation and longitudinal integration, making the quartic and higher vertices finite.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This construction suggests the light-cone divergence is not an intrinsic obstruction but a boundary-of-moduli artifact; the same stubbing mechanism may cure contact-term singularities in other superstring formulations with colliding local operators.
  • A natural independent test is a stubbed four-point amplitude with one NS and three Ramond external states; finiteness at the collision moduli point would strengthen the four-Ramond evidence.
  • If Conjecture (2.55) is proved to all orders, the $S$-map would give a complete DDF-oscillator realization of the light-cone states, making the longitudinal-integration step fully rigorous and potentially extendible to closed-string or higher-genus amplitudes.
  • The effective vertices act as an infinite tower of counter-terms for the contact divergence, so the stubbed theory can be viewed as a minimal-subtraction scheme for light-cone superstring amplitudes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper extends the bosonic construction of Erler and Matsunaga to the open superstring, proposing a chain of theories (Witten-type, Kaku-type, Kugo-Zwiebach-type, and a stubbed light-cone-gauge effective theory) connected by a similarity transformation S and by homological perturbation theory. The central claim is that the stubbed light-cone-gauge superstring field theory is consistent, i.e. free of the divergences caused by collisions of supercurrent insertions at interaction points, and that this provides a possible proof of unitarity of the Witten-type superstring field theory. The authors compute massless cubic vertices, a massless four-Ramond vertex in the stubbed theory, and give an all-order homological-transfer formula for the effective vertices. The paper is explicit and technically detailed, but the central consistency claim is explicitly conditional on an unproved conjecture about the similarity transformation S, and the all-order finiteness argument is heuristic.

Significance. If the construction is correct, it would resolve a long-standing problem: a consistent light-cone-gauge superstring field theory with manifest unitarity, obtained from the gauge-invariant A-infinity formulation. The paper contains substantial positive elements: the explicit oscillator-level map S, the identification of its images with DDF operators, the detailed evaluation of cubic vertices recovering known light-cone results, the explicit finiteness computation for the massless stubbed four-Ramond vertex, and a closed-form all-order homological-transfer prescription for effective vertices. These are nontrivial and valuable. However, the load-bearing parts of the argument are not fully proven: the key Conjecture (2.55) is checked only to low order in Appendix B, and the all-order absence of divergence is asserted rather than demonstrated. The paper therefore merits publication only after these gaps are closed or clearly isolated as assumptions.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.4, Conjecture (2.55)] The central construction depends on Conjecture (2.55), which states that for an operator O without contractions with X+ or psi+, S O S^-1 equals the inverse superconformal transformation generated by (2.56). This conjecture is explicitly not proved; Appendix B verifies only the first two orders in the R-expansion, Eqs. (B.25) and (B.30), for primary superfields. The oscillator maps (2.63)-(2.83), the S-images of states used in (5.10) and (5.50), and hence every effective vertex computed in Section 5 are derived from this conjecture. The minus oscillators alpha^-_n and psi^-_r are not covered directly because they have contractions with X+ and psi+, and their transformations (2.80)-(2.83) are inferred via BRST relations (2.78)-(2.83), so the longitudinal integration inherits the same unproved assumption. If the conjecture fails at higher orders, the identification H_DDF = S H_perp_lc and the entire map from covariant to light-cone vertices are not established. This is a genuine logical gap, and it is acknowledged in the paper.
  2. [Section 5.3 and Section 7] The claim that the stubbed theory is consistent at all orders is not established. Section 5.3 shows finiteness only for the massless four-Ramond vertex in the tu-channel, for which the sums of contributions in (5.72) are finite at the collision points x=x+ and x=x-. For general higher vertices, the argument is the heuristic statement that after acting with S the correlation functions are those of DDF states and therefore there is nothing to cause divergence, and the section concludes it is reasonable to conclude that the stubbed theory has no divergence. Section 7 then argues that the stubbed theory is divergence-free because it is equivalent to the gauge-invariant theory, but that equivalence is precisely the construction whose consistency is being assessed, and the same paragraph states that a direct verification of the divergence cancellation remains an issue for future work. This is circular insofar as the all-order consistency claim rests on the very equivalence that the paper is trying to establish.
  3. [Section 6.2, Eqs. (6.5)-(6.10) and (6.23)-(6.29)] The field redefinition connecting the Witten-type and Kugo-Zwiebach-type theories requires an even coderivation R^l satisfying Eqs. (6.5)-(6.10). The recursive construction of R^l uses the operation xi_0 to solve equations of the form [eta, sigma] = RHS, e.g. (6.24) and (6.29), but the paper does not prove that each right-hand side is eta-closed, which is a prerequisite for applying xi_0. The statement that the recurrence is solved by complete induction is not accompanied by the necessary verification of eta-closedness at each step. The same unproved solvability underlies the recursive construction in Appendix C, Eq. (C.14). Since the unitarity proof for the Witten-type theory depends on the existence of this field redefinition, this is a further load-bearing gap.
  4. [Section 4.2, Eq. (4.38)] The all-order effective action is presented through the homological-transfer formula (4.38), but the paper does not discuss convergence or well-definedness of the infinite sums defining the coderivations I, T, and M^+, nor the domain of the successive approximations of Psi_long in Eq. (4.10). In particular, the longitudinal propagator Q^+ involves the operator 1/L_parallel^0 and the Ramond-sector denominator (gamma0 beta0 - psi+0 psi-0), whose zero-mode structure requires the restrictions discussed in Section 2.2; the all-order iteration of the recursive equation (4.9) is not shown to remain within the restricted space at every order. This is not a fatal flaw by itself, but it is part of what would be needed for a complete proof of the central claim.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 5.3, Eq. (5.54)] The notation '5-terms' after the spin-operator correlator is unexplained; the five permutations should be listed explicitly or defined by symmetry.
  2. [Section 5.3, Fig. 5.1] The caption of Fig. 5.1 refers to '(a) extra vertex for stub length lambda', but the text and the figure panels are not fully aligned; it would help to state explicitly which intervals in the moduli variable x correspond to the stubbed regions x-delta to x- and x+ to x+delta.
  3. [Section 2.4, Eq. (2.55)] The notation F^{-1} composed with O is not defined before its use in the Conjecture; it would be clearer to write the superconformal transformation law for operators, as is done in Appendix B for primary superfields, and to state explicitly that the conjecture is assumed to hold for non-primary operators as well.
  4. [Section 5.2, Eq. (5.33)] In the evaluation of the NS-R-R vertex, the replacement of sqrt(2 i partial X+) by the zero mode alpha+0/xi in the local coordinate system is stated without an off-shell justification; a footnote or reference explaining why this replacement is valid in the correlation function would improve rigor.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the derivation is an explicit algebraic/homotopical chain; Conjecture (2.55) is an unproved assumption, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

Walked the derivation chain. The map S=e^{-R} is constructed by solving the differential equation (2.42) with explicit r1,r2, the homological transfer (4.35)-(4.38) and field redefinition (6.11)-(6.12) are stated as explicit formulas, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The computations of the cubic and quartic vertices in Section 5 are consistency checks against the known light-cone theory and an explicit finite four-Ramond calculation, not circular reductions. The paper's central caveat is Conjecture (2.55): the S-images of operators are derived from an unproved superconformal-transformation statement, with Appendix B verifying only low orders. This is a genuine correctness risk—the oscillator images and all effective vertices are conditional on it—but it is not circularity, because the conjecture is not defined in terms of the light-cone vertices it is used to compute. The Section 7 argument that the stubbed theory is divergence-free because it is equivalent to the gauge-invariant theory is a conditional consistency argument, and the unitarity claim for the Witten-type theory is explicitly hedged ('possibly gives'). Self-citations (e.g., [39], [46]) supply the A-infinity/PCO construction method, but the needed equations are restated in the paper and the bosonic analogue [7] is external; no load-bearing claim is forced solely by a self-citation chain. Overall, no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's construction is formal and analytic; no numerical data are involved. The central result depends on the unproved Conjecture 2.55, on the assumed A-infinity superstring product structure from prior work, on the BRST triviality of the longitudinal sector, on k+ nonzero, and on the solvability of the Kaku interpolation equations. The stub and Chan-Paton lengths are arbitrary parameters of the construction, not fitted constants. No invented physical entities appear in the sense of new particles, forces, or dimensions.

free parameters (2)
  • stub length lambda = unspecified
    Arbitrary worldsheet stub parameter used in Section 5.3 to shift interaction-point collision moduli into quartic and higher vertices; the consistency claim is meant for this one-parameter family and no value is fitted.
  • Chan-Paton parameter l = unspecified
    Interpolation parameter in the Kaku-type theory (Section 6.1); l=0 gives light-cone-type vertices and l approaches infinity gives Witten-type vertices, and the field redefinition integrates over l. It is chosen by construction, not fitted.
assumptions (5)
  • ad hoc to paper Conjecture (2.55): S O S^{-1} equals the inverse superconformal transformation F^{-1} applied to O for operators O without contractions with X+ or psi+, with F_z and F_theta given in (2.56).
    Stated as a conjecture in Section 2.4; Appendix B gives only low-order evidence. The S-transformation of oscillators and states used for all vertices depends on it.
  • domain assumption Existence, cyclicity, and A-infinity structure of the superstring products M_n with picture numbers, as described in Appendix C.
    Inherited from the Witten-type superstring field theory literature, primarily Erler-Okawa-Takezaki and Kunitomo-Okawa; the light-cone effective action (4.15) presupposes this structure.
  • domain assumption The longitudinal sector is BRST trivial with homotopy Q+ satisfying {Q, Q+} = P_long, Eq. (2.93).
    Needed for the homological perturbation integration out of unphysical fields in Section 4.2; if this fails, the effective light-cone vertices are not well-defined.
  • domain assumption The light-cone integration assumes k+ is nonzero so that derivative with respect to x- is invertible.
    Stated in Section 3.3 for massless fields; the elimination of longitudinal fields requires this to solve the equations of motion.
  • ad hoc to paper The Kaku-type interpolation has an even coderivation R_l solving Eqs. (6.5)-(6.10), and each equation of the form [eta, sigma] = RHS is solvable by the xi_0 operation.
    Section 6.2 constructs R_l recursively assuming known bosonic rho_l^(0) and eta-exactness; the field redefinition and unitarity argument depend on this solvability.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A consistent light-cone-gauge superstring field theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6D5QKKZZ

@misc{pith2026241119570,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A consistent light-cone-gauge superstring field theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6D5QKKZZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.19570}
}
abstract

Extending a recent development in the bosonic string field theory, we construct a map from the Witten-type gauge-invariant superstring field theory based on an $A_{\infty}$ structure to a light-cone-gauge superstring field theory via two intermediate theories, which we call the Kaku-type and Kugo-Zwiebach-type superstring field theories. We find that a naive extension only gives us an inconsistent light-cone-gauge theory that suffers from the well-known problem caused by divergence due to collisions of local operators. However, we also find that this difficulty may be resolved by considering the stubbed theory and propose it as a consistent light-cone-gauge superstring field theory. The result possibly gives a proof of the unitarity of the Witten-type superstring field theory.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.19570 by the authors.

Figure 4.1
Figure 4.1. The light-cone-gauge effective four-string vertex has two contributions: original vertex and new contributions (in the blue dotted box) appeared by integrating out the longitu￾dinal fields. These maps are chain maps between the BRST chain complexes (Hcov, Q) and (Hlc, Qlc), and also (H (res) cov , Q) and (H (res) lc , Qlc): they satisfy Qι = ιQlc, τQ = Q lcτ. (4.21) The isomorphism of cohomologies follows the existe… view at source ↗
Figure 5.1
Figure 5.1. The tu-channel light-cone diagram for α1, α2 > 0 and α3, α4 < 0. To investigate whether the quartic vertices in stubbed theory contain divergence or not, we evaluate the four-Ramond vertex of massless states as an example. In particular, we consider the tu-channel scattering, where the collision of interaction points is inevitable. The tu-channel four-string light-cone diagram ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p0… view at source ↗
Figure 5.2
Figure 5.2. Integration contour of b ghost The moduli x is related to the light-cone time through the difference of two interaction points: τ = ρ(z+(x)) − ρ(z−(x)), (5.52) from which we have dτ dx = P4 I=1 αIZI  (z+ − z−) Q I6=3(x − ZI ) . (5.53) The integration region [xa, xb] is determined according to that of the light-cone time τ : [xa, xb] is equal to [x−, x+] for the quartic vertex in the theory without stub ( [PITH_FUL… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 5.3
Figure 5.3. Figure 5.3: Integration contours of R⊥ F Evaluating the bc correlation function, it becomes V lc R-R-R-R = Y I [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_5_3.png]
Figure 5.4
Figure 5.4. Figure 5.4: Integration contour on which the correlation function evaluated First, consider the contribution from the part II. While the longitudinal fields are also propagating, it has a similar structure to the divergent contribution of the stubless theory, 37 [PITH_FULL_IMAG…
Figure 6.1
Figure 6.1. Figure 6.1: Diagram of an open string propagator with the length α + l the bosonic string field theory [33,34]. Following the prescription, we can obtain a superstring field theory action where we choose M (0) 2 to be a Witten vertex [4] and M (0) 3 , M(0) 4 , . . . are chosen t…
Figure 6.2
Figure 6.2. Figure 6.2: The cubic Kaku vertex when α1, α2 > 0, α3 < 0. connecting the Kugo-Zwiebach theory and Witten’s bosonic string field theory. In a similar sense, it is quite natural to expect that the Kaku-type superstring field theory connects the Kugo-Zwiebach-type and Witten-type …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The Field Theory of Relativistic Strings. I. Trees,

    M. Kaku and K. Kikkawa, “The Field Theory of Relativistic Strings. I. Trees,” Phys. Rev. D 10 (1974), 1110 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.10.1110

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.10.1110 1974

  2. [2]

    The Field Theory of Spinning Strings,

    M. Kaku, “The Field Theory of Spinning Strings,” Phys. Re v. D 10 (1974), 3943 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.10.3943

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.10.3943 1974

  3. [3]

    Superstring Field Theory,

    M. B. Green and J. H. Schwarz, “Superstring Field Theory, ” Nucl. Phys. B 243 (1984), 475-536 doi:10.1016/0550-3213(84)90488-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(84)90488-7 1984

  4. [4]

    Noncommutative Geometry and String Field Th eory,

    E. Witten, “Noncommutative Geometry and String Field Th eory,” Nucl. Phys. B 268 (1986), 253-294 doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90155-0

    doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90155-0 1986

  5. [5]

    Interacting Field Theory of Open Superstrin gs,

    E. Witten, “Interacting Field Theory of Open Superstrin gs,” Nucl. Phys. B 276 (1986), 291-324 doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90298-1 63

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90298-1 1986

  6. [6]

    Complete Action for Open Superstring Field Theory with Cyclic $A_\infty$ Structure

    T. Erler, Y. Okawa and T. Takezaki, “Complete Action for O pen Superstring Field Theory with Cyclic A∞ Structure,” JHEP 08 (2016), 012 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2016)012 [ arXiv:1602.02582 [hep-th]]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    Mapping between Witten and Lightcone String Field Theories

    T. Erler and H. Matsunaga, “Mapping between Witten and li ghtcone string field theories,” JHEP 11 (2021), 208 doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2021)208 [ arXiv:2012.09521 [hep-th]]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    Target space duality as a symmet ry of string field theory,

    T. Kugo and B. Zwiebach, “Target space duality as a symmet ry of string field theory,” Prog. Theor. Phys. 87 (1992), 801-860 doi:10.1143/ptp/87.4.801 [ arXiv:hep-th/9201040 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 1992

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    Manif estly Covariant Field Theory of Interacting String,

    H. Hata, K. Itoh, T. Kugo, H. Kunitomo and K. Ogawa, “Manif estly Covariant Field Theory of Interacting String,” Phys. Lett. B 172 (1986), 186-194 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)90834-8

    1986 doi

  2. [10]

    Cova riant String Field Theory,

    H. Hata, K. Itoh, T. Kugo, H. Kunitomo and K. Ogawa, “Cova riant String Field Theory,” Phys. Rev. D 34 (1986), 2360 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.34.2360

    1986 doi

  3. [11]

    WHY ARE THERE TWO BRST STRING FIELD THEORIES?,

    M. Kaku, “WHY ARE THERE TWO BRST STRING FIELD THEORIES?, ” Phys. Lett. B 200, 22-30 (1988) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(88)91102-1

    1988 doi

  4. [12]

    Resolving Witten‘s s uperstring field theory,

    T. Erler, S. Konopka and I. Sachs, “Resolving Witten‘s s uperstring field theory,” JHEP 04 (2014), 150 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2014)150 [ arXiv:1312.2948 [hep-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Interacting String Picture of the Neve u-Schwarz-Ramond Model,

    S. Mandelstam, “Interacting String Picture of the Neve u-Schwarz-Ramond Model,” Nucl. Phys. B 69 (1974), 77-106 doi:10.1016/0550-3213(74)90127-8

    1974 doi

  6. [14]

    New Interactions fo r Superstrings,

    J. Greensite and F. R. Klinkhamer, “New Interactions fo r Superstrings,” Nucl. Phys. B 281 (1987), 269-288 doi:10.1016/0550-3213(87)90256-2

    1987 doi

  7. [15]

    Superstring Amplit udes and Contact Interactions,

    J. Greensite and F. R. Klinkhamer, “Superstring Amplit udes and Contact Interactions,” Nucl. Phys. B 304 (1988), 108-128 doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90622-0

    1988 doi

  8. [16]

    Contact Interactions in Sup erstring Theory,

    M. B. Green and N. Seiberg, “Contact Interactions in Sup erstring Theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 299 (1988), 559-586 doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90549-4

    1988 doi

  9. [17]

    Light-Cone Gaug e Superstring Field Theory and Dimensional Regularization,

    Y. Baba, N. Ishibashi and K. Murakami, “Light-Cone Gaug e Superstring Field Theory and Dimensional Regularization,” JHEP 10 (2009), 035 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/10/035 [arXiv:0906.3577 [hep-th]]

    2009 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Light-cone Gaug e NSR Strings in Noncritical Dimen- sions,

    Y. Baba, N. Ishibashi and K. Murakami, “Light-cone Gaug e NSR Strings in Noncritical Dimen- sions,” JHEP 01 (2010), 119 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2010)119 [ arXiv:0911.3704 [hep-th]]

    2010 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Light-cone Gaug e Superstring Field Theory and Dimen- sional Regularization II,

    Y. Baba, N. Ishibashi and K. Murakami, “Light-cone Gaug e Superstring Field Theory and Dimen- sional Regularization II,” JHEP 08 (2010), 102 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2010)102 [ arXiv:0912.4811 [hep-th]]

    2010 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Relating Green-Schwarz and ex tended pure spinor formalisms by similarity transformation,

    Y. Aisaka and Y. Kazama, “Relating Green-Schwarz and ex tended pure spinor formalisms by similarity transformation,” JHEP 04 (2004), 070 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/04/070 [arXiv:hep-th/0404141 [hep-th]]

    2004 arXiv

  13. [21]

    BRST Cohomology of the Su pervirasoro Algebras,

    B. H. Lian and G. J. Zuckerman, “BRST Cohomology of the Su pervirasoro Algebras,” Commun. Math. Phys. 125 (1989), 301 doi:10.1007/BF01217910 64

    1989 doi

  14. [22]

    Spectrum Generating Al gebra and No Ghost Theorem for the Neveu-schwarz Model,

    R. C. Brower and K. A. Friedman, “Spectrum Generating Al gebra and No Ghost Theorem for the Neveu-schwarz Model,” Phys. Rev. D 7 (1973), 535-539 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.7.535

    1973 doi

  15. [23]

    Compatibility of the Dual Po meron with Unitarity and the Absence of Ghosts in the Dual Resonance Model,

    P. Goddard and C. B. Thorn, “Compatibility of the Dual Po meron with Unitarity and the Absence of Ghosts in the Dual Resonance Model,” Phys. Lett. B 40 (1972), 235-238 doi:10.1016/0370- 2693(72)90420-0

    1972 doi

  16. [24]

    Physical States and Pomeron Poles in the Dual Pion Model,

    J. H. Schwarz, “Physical States and Pomeron Poles in the Dual Pion Model,” Nucl. Phys. B 46 (1972), 61-74 doi:10.1016/0550-3213(72)90201-5

    1972 doi

  17. [25]

    Superstring BRST no-ghost theorem at a rbitrary picture number,

    M. Dedushenko, “Superstring BRST no-ghost theorem at a rbitrary picture number,” [arXiv:1212.3592 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  18. [26]

    Kunitomo and Y

    H. Kunitomo and Y. Okawa, PTEP 2016 (2016) no.2, 023B01 doi:10.1093/ptep/ptv189 [arXiv:1508.00366 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Transfering A∞ (strongly homotopy associative) structures,

    M. Markl, “Transfering A∞ (strongly homotopy associative) structures,” Supplem. ai Rend. Circ. Matem. Palermo Ser. II 79(2006), 139-151 [ arXiv:math/0401007]

    2006 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Perturbative path-integr al of string fields and the A ∞ struc- ture of the BV master equation,

    T. Masuda and H. Matsunaga, “Perturbative path-integr al of string fields and the A ∞ struc- ture of the BV master equation,” PTEP 2022 (2022) no.11, 113B04 doi:10.1093/ptep/ptac132 [arXiv:2003.05021 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Gauge-invariant ope rators of open bosonic string field theory in the low-energy limit,

    D. Koyama, Y. Okawa and N. Suzuki, “Gauge-invariant ope rators of open bosonic string field theory in the low-energy limit,” [ arXiv:2006.16710 [hep-th]]

    2006 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Cl assical algebraic structures in string theory effective actions,

    H. Erbin, C. Maccaferri, M. Schnabl and J. Voˇ smera, “Cl assical algebraic structures in string theory effective actions,” JHEP 11 (2020), 123 doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2020)123 [ arXiv:2006.16270 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Homoto py Transfer and Effective Field Theory I: Tree-level,

    A. S. Arvanitakis, O. Hohm, C. Hull and V. Lekeu, “Homoto py Transfer and Effective Field Theory I: Tree-level,” Fortsch. Phys. 70 (2022) no.2-3, 2200003 doi:10.1002/prop.202200003 [arXiv:2007.07942 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Homoto py Transfer and Effective Field Theory II: Strings and Double Field Theory,

    A. S. Arvanitakis, O. Hohm, C. Hull and V. Lekeu, “Homoto py Transfer and Effective Field Theory II: Strings and Double Field Theory,” Fortsch. Phys. 70 (2022) no.2-3, 2200004 doi:10.1002/prop.202200004 [ arXiv:2106.08343 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  25. [33]

    String F ield Theory on the Conformal Plane. 1. Kinematical Principles,

    A. LeClair, M. E. Peskin and C. R. Preitschopf, “String F ield Theory on the Conformal Plane. 1. Kinematical Principles,” Nucl. Phys. B 317 (1989), 411-463 doi:10.1016/0550-3213(89)90075-8

    1989 doi

  26. [34]

    LeClair, M

    A. LeClair, M. E. Peskin and C. R. Preitschopf, “String F ield Theory on the Conformal Plane

  27. [35]

    Generalized Gluing,” Nucl. Phys. B 317 (1989), 464-508 doi:10.1016/0550-3213(89)90076-X

    1989 doi

  28. [36]

    Developing the covariant Bata lin-Vilkovisky approach to string the- ory,

    H. Hata and B. Zwiebach, “Developing the covariant Bata lin-Vilkovisky approach to string the- ory,” Annals Phys. 229 (1994), 177-216 doi:10.1006/aphy.1994.1006 [ arXiv:hep-th/9301097 [hep- th]]

    1994

  29. [37]

    Open string field theory w ith stubs,

    M. Schnabl and G. Stettinger, “Open string field theory w ith stubs,” JHEP 07 (2023), 032 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2023)032 [ arXiv:2301.13182 [hep-th]]. 65

    2023 arXiv

  30. [38]

    More on stubs in open stri ng field theory,

    M. Schnabl and G. Stettinger, “More on stubs in open stri ng field theory,” JHEP 02 (2025), 017 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2025)017 [ arXiv:2402.00308 [hep-th]]

    2025 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Open string stub as an auxiliar y string field,

    H. Erbin and A. H. Fırat, “Open string stub as an auxiliar y string field,” SciPost Phys. 17 (2024) no.2, 044 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.17.2.044 [ arXiv:2308.08587 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Kunitomo and T

    H. Kunitomo and T. Sugimoto, PTEP 2019 (2019) no.6, 063B02 [erratum: PTEP 2020 (2020) no.1, 019201] doi:10.1093/ptep/ptz051 [ arXiv:1902.02991 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Superstring Field Theory and the Wess-Zumin o-Witten Action,

    T. Erler, “Superstring Field Theory and the Wess-Zumin o-Witten Action,” JHEP 10 (2017), 057 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2017)057 [ arXiv:1706.02629 [hep-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  34. [42]

    M. Ito, T. Morozumi, S. Nojiri and S. Uehara, Prog. Theor . Phys. 75 (1986), 934 doi:10.1143/PTP.75.934

    1986 doi

  35. [43]

    BRST Cohomology of the Fermionic String,

    M. Henneaux, “BRST Cohomology of the Fermionic String, ” Phys. Lett. B 183 (1987), 59-64 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)91417-1

    1987 doi

  36. [44]

    Some results on t he BRST cohomology of the NSR string,

    J. Figueroa-O’Farrill and T. Kimura, “Some results on t he BRST cohomology of the NSR string,” Phys. Lett. B 219 (1989), 273-277 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(89)90390-0

    1989 doi

  37. [45]

    V. A. Kostelecky, O. Lechtenfeld, W. Lerche, S. Samuel a nd S. Watamura, Nucl. Phys. B 288 (1987), 173-232 doi:10.1016/0550-3213(87)90213-6

    1987 doi

  38. [46]

    Asada and I

    M. Asada and I. Kishimoto, PTEP 2018 (2018) no.3, 033B06 doi:10.1093/ptep/pty022 [arXiv:1712.05935 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Tree-level S-matrix of superstring field theory with homotopy algebra structure,

    H. Kunitomo, “Tree-level S-matrix of superstring field theory with homotopy algebra structure,” JHEP 03 (2021), 193 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2021)193 [ arXiv:2011.11975 [hep-th]]. 66

    2021 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.