Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 61 references

Design of structured La$_{2-x}$Sr$_{x}$CuO$_{4}$ films as superconducting transition-edge sensors at 4.2K

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Simulations show carrier-density patterning lifts LSCO bolometer dynamic range 35-fold at 4.2 K.

desk verdict A competent computational design study for LSCO TES at 4.2K, worth a serious referee, but the headline DR gains are in-sample predictions that hinge on an untested cell-level homogeneity assumption. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.19656 v1 pith:DF5AIUTU submitted 2024-11-29 cond-mat.supr-con physics.ins-det

classification cond-mat.supr-conphysics.ins-det
keywords transition-edgesensorsbolometersradiationdetectorsLa2-xSrxCuO4carrier-densitypatterningcupratethinfilmsdynamicrangeconstant-currentmode
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that deliberately patterning the local carrier density of La$_{2-x}$Sr$_x$CuO$_4$ thin films turns them into practical superconducting transition-edge bolometers operating at liquid-helium temperature (4.2 K). Using finite-element simulations that include both the material's intrinsic nanoscale doping disorder and imposed multi-zone patterns, the authors find designs that markedly improve the two quantities that govern sensing: saturation power $P_{\max}$ and dynamic range $DR = P_{\max}/P_{\min}$. For example, a ten-zone overdoped pattern reaches $DR \approx 7\times10^5$ in the easy constant-current mode, compared with about $2\times10^4$ for an unpatterned film. A sympathetic reader would care because these gains arrive without SQUID readout and with a straightforward ohmic, linear-in-temperature operating region, making a 4.2 K TES based on a high-temperature superconductor plausible.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is a finite-element model of a $(6\,\mu\mathrm{m})^2$ film divided into $(30\,\mathrm{nm})^2$ cells, each assigned a single local carrier density $p$ and the corresponding homogeneous-film resistance from phenomenological equations: a $T_c(p)$ dome with a dip at $p=1/8$, normal-state resistivity fitted to measured LSCO data, and paraconductivity covering Kosterlitz-Thouless, Gaussian, and short-wavelength fluctuation regimes. On top of the nominal pattern $\bar p(\mathbf r)$ the model adds a Gaussian random disorder whose width follows from doping nonstoichiometry (Eq. 7). An automated search scans slice patterns of the form $\bar p_j = \bar p_{\min} + (\bar p_{\max}-\bar p_{\min}) j^\beta/(N-1)^\beta$ with positions $x_j \propto (\bar p_j-\bar p_{\min})^\gamma$, solving a 200×200 mesh-current matrix at each temperature to obtain $R(T)$, then evaluating the bolometric parameters through a thermal-balance equation with Joule self-heating in constant-current and constant-voltage modes.

What would settle it

Fabricate the OD-10 zone pattern (ten slices, $\bar p$ from 0.160 to 0.255) on a 100 nm LSCO film on (100)SrTiO$_3$, and measure its constant-current output versus incident power at a 4.2 K bath: the claimed dynamic range $DR\approx7\times10^5$ and linear span $T^+-4.2\,\mathrm{K}\approx22\,\mathrm{K}$ would be directly confirmed or refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that carrier-density structuration—regular spatial maps of nominal doping $\bar p(\mathbf r)$ superimposed on the unavoidable random disorder—can be optimized to reshape the $R(T)$ transition of LSCO films so that a TES bolometer at 4.2 K operates over a much wider linear range. The best designs found by the search algorithm use a modest number of zones (six or ten) with doping profiles given by power laws in position; these yield about an order of magnitude larger dynamic range than the non-patterned films, with improved or comparable temperature coefficient of resistance and no penalty in minimum detectable power. In constant-current mode, which is simpler to implement than constant-voltage mode, the overdoped ten-zone design achieves $DR \approx 7\times10^5$, roughly 35 times the unpatterned value, with a linear operating span extending about 22 K above the bath temperature.

Load-bearing premise

The predictions hold only if every microscopic patch of the patterned film behaves exactly like a uniform piece of the same material with that patch's carrier density, ignoring extra resistance from zone boundaries, proximity effects, and fabrication damage.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Six-zone and ten-zone patterns in both underdoped and overdoped LSCO improve dynamic range by roughly an order of magnitude over non-patterned films at 4.2 K.
  • The best overdoped ten-zone pattern reaches $DR\approx7\times10^5$ in constant-current mode, avoiding the SQUID readout usually associated with constant-voltage TES operation.
  • The linear operating span $T^+-4.2\,\mathrm{K}$ widens from about 1 K in unpatterned films to about 14 K (UD-10) or 22 K (OD-10), giving a wide ohmic response window.
  • Temperature coefficient of resistance is not sacrificed: the best patterns improve TCR by more than 50% in the underdoped case.
  • These simulated performances are competitive with reported TES bolometers at 4.2 K using low-temperature superconductors, without the narrow-transition thermal-runaway constraints.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the local-resistance-per-cell assumption survives interface effects, the same slice-pattern search could be transplanted to other cuprates or to other operating temperatures by changing the $T_c(p)$ and resistivity inputs.
  • Because the gains come mostly from broadening the linear $R(T)$ region rather than from intrinsic material sensitivity, simpler fabrication routes—even a small number of discrete stripes—may capture most of the benefit; the power-law profiles are one parametrization, not necessarily the only one.
  • A direct experimental test would be to fabricate the UD-6 or OD-10 pattern and measure $R(T)$ and the output-versus-power curve at 4.2 K; deviation from the predicted $T^+$ or $DR$ would signal missing physics such as proximity effects or fabrication-induced disorder, which the paper itself flags in its concluding section.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper presents a computational study of carrier-density structured La2−xSrxCuO4 films as transition-edge sensors (TES) operating at a 4.2 K bath temperature. The authors model the resistive transition of each local region using phenomenological equations for Tc(p) (Eq. 1), normal-state resistivity (Eqs. 2–3), and fluctuation conductivity (Eqs. 4–5), add a Gaussian nanoscale disorder contribution (Eq. 7), and then perform a 200×200 finite-element resistor-network simulation to compute the global R(T) of patterned films. Using ad-hoc seek algorithms over a power-law slice parameterization (Eqs. 8–9), they report optimized patterns for both underdoped (UD–6, UD–10) and overdoped (OD–6, OD–10) films, claiming marked improvements in saturation power Pmax and dynamic range DR relative to unpatterned films. The model is validated against one published R(T) curve of a non-patterned film (Fig. 3). The paper concludes that structured LSCO films are promising TES candidates at liquid-He temperature, with the best overdoped pattern (OD–10) reaching DR ≈ 7×10^5 in constant-current mode.

Significance. If the patterned predictions hold, this is a useful design study that extends the known YBCO-based approach to LSCO and proposes specific, reproducible pattern geometries (Table 1) with quantified bolometric parameters. The modeling is built on extensive published data for Tc(p), normal-state resistivity, and fluctuation conductivity, and the finite-element procedure is described in enough detail to be reproduced. The paper also makes falsifiable predictions: specific patterns are claimed to give specific values of Pmax, DR, TCR, and T+−4.2 K. However, the central quantitative claims are entirely simulation-based, and the cell-level constitutive closure (that every 30 nm cell behaves like a homogeneous LSCO film of the same local p) is not validated against any patterned-film measurement. The significance is therefore conditional: the paper offers a plausible and well-documented avenue for TES design, but the magnitude of the claimed improvements should be treated as an in-model result until the patterned closure is tested.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sections 2.1–2.3, Table 1] The patterned predictions in Table 1 and Figs. 1–2 are computed by assigning to every 200×200 finite-element cell the homogeneous-film R(T) from Eqs. 1–7, with no coupling between neighboring cells beyond Ohm's law and no allowance for extra fabrication-induced disorder. The authors themselves flag in Sect. 6(i) that pattern fabrication could induce additional disorder and suggest that experimentalists verify this. Because the headline quantities (Pmax, DR, T+) are all computed within this closure, the claimed order-of-magnitude improvements are conditional on an untested constitutive assumption. To make the claim load-bearing, I would ask for a sensitivity analysis in which the cell-level R(T) is perturbed (for example by adding an interface resistance or smearing the p profile across zone boundaries) and the reported Pmax/DR are recomputed, or a direct comparison of one patterned film against simulation, or at minimum a clear statement that these improvements are predictions of the homogeneous-cell model that remain to be tested.
  2. [Section 2.3 and Table 1] The pattern parameters (p_min, p_max, N, beta, gamma) are selected by the ad-hoc seek algorithms to maximize the very same quantities (Pmax, DR) that are then reported as the improvements. This is an in-model optimization, so the reported gains are not independent predictions; in particular, the improvement of DR by about one order of magnitude could partly reflect overfitting of the power-law form in Eqs. 8–9 to the model. I request an out-of-sample robustness check: for example, re-optimize on one disorder realization and evaluate on another, or compare the optimized patterns against a set of random patterns with the same N, to quantify how much of the gain is due to the search procedure. If such a check is not performed, the conclusions should be phrased as 'within-model optimal designs' rather than as unconditional improvements.
  3. [Section 3, Fig. 3] The only experimental validation of the model is a single R(T) curve of a non-patterned LSCO film, and the comparison is made with the carrier density adjusted within 10% of the reported value to match Tc. This validates the homogeneous-film equations for one doping, but it does not test the patterned closure: zone boundaries, finite-size effects, and fabrication damage can alter the local R(T) in ways that a homogeneous-film formula cannot capture. To strengthen the claim, the authors should compare their simulation procedure against additional non-patterned films (for instance the datasets used to produce Ref. [42]) and, ideally, against a simple two-zone or step-patterned film, so that the per-cell assignment is tested in the presence of interfaces.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Section 2.1.2] The phrase 'we preformed these fits' should be 'we performed these fits'.
  2. [Figure 2 caption] The caption says 'underdoped (OD)' but the overdoped case is labeled OD; this should read 'overdoped (OD)'.
  3. [Figure 1 caption] In the first row, the third column is described as 'the output voltage for fixed current (CVM operation mode)'; fixed-current operation is the constant-current mode (CCM), so this should be corrected, while the fourth column is correctly labeled CVM.
  4. [Eq. 7] Equation 7 is described as a full-width at half-maximum, but the text does not state how the FWHM is converted to the standard deviation of the Gaussian used in the disorder draws; please clarify the relation.
  5. [Section 2.3] The phrase 'we run simulations' should be 'we ran simulations'.
  6. [Table 1] The N=1 rows are labeled 'zone 1' while the other rows are labeled 'zone 6'/'zone 10'; consider using 'zone' consistently for all rows or renaming the N=1 rows as 'zone 1' was intended.
  7. [Title/Abstract] The title and abstract use La2−xSrxCuO4 while the body also uses La2−xSrxCuO4+y; please make the oxygen stoichiometry notation consistent throughout.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the homogeneous R(T) model is anchored to external LSCO data and validated against a non-patterned film, while the pattern optimization is a transparent design search rather than a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The cell-level R(T,p) is fixed by literature-fitted phenomenological equations (Eqs. 1-5) and by an externally measured disorder width (Eq. 7); the self-cited inputs ([24], [42], [44]) are parameterizations compared against independent LSCO data, and the full non-patterned model is checked against the experimental R(T) of Shi et al. in Fig. 3. The patterned predictions are extrapolations of that validated homogeneous model through a 200x200 resistor network; the local-homogeneity assumption (Sect. 2.1) is an acknowledged modeling approximation, not a definitional reduction. The pattern parameters in Table 1 are selected by the authors' seek algorithms to maximize Pmax and DR, so the reported gains are model-evaluated optimization outcomes; this is transparent design optimization, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, since the model was not tuned to produce the gains and the same simulation pipeline is applied to baseline and patterned films. Sect. 6(i) explicitly flags fabrication-induced disorder as an open experimental check, which further shows the patterned claims are contingent model predictions rather than consequences of the model's definitions.

Assumptions & free parameters 12 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The free parameters are mostly phenomenological coefficients imported from prior experimental fits, plus the optimized pattern parameters that are tuned to the paper's own bolometric objective. The main assumptions concern the transfer of homogeneous-film R(T) and disorder statistics to 30nm-scale patterned cells.

free parameters (12)
  • T_c^opt = 23 K
    Maximum critical temperature in Eq. 1 for the Tc(p) dome, corresponding to 100 nm LSCO films on (100)SrTiO3, taken from Refs [44,50].
  • deltaTc1/8 = 4.8 K
    Depth of the 1/8 doping depression in Eq. 1, from Refs [44,50].
  • Normal-state resistivity coefficients A(p), B(p), C(p), D(p) = Not tabulated
    Coefficients in Eqs. 2-3 fitted to resistivity data from Ando et al. [29] and Cooper et al. [30]; values are not provided in the paper.
  • TKT = Tc - 2K
    Kosterlitz-Thouless temperature in Eq. 4, found in LSCO films to be well approximated by Tc-2K (Ref [42]).
  • TGi = 1.015 Tc
    Ginzburg temperature boundary between KT and Gaussian fluctuation regimes in Eq. 4-5, from Refs [42,58].
  • T_c (cutoff) = 1.7 Tc
    Cutoff temperature above which fluctuation effects become negligible; footnote 1 notes a larger value is found in some cases but 1.7Tc fits data below 30K.
  • Layer spacing d = 6.6 Å
    Distance between superconducting layers in LSCO, used in Eq. 5, from Refs [34,44].
  • Disorder FWHM prefactor in Eq. 7 = 0.0162
    Determines the width of the Gaussian carrier-density disorder from a coarse-grain size of (30 nm)^2, based on Refs [44,59].
  • Thermal conductance G = 10^-5 W/K
    Value in Eq. 10, described as typical for bolometers at 4.2K (Ref [23]); not derived or varied.
  • Readout resolution = 10^-4
    Fixed relative resolution for current and voltage signals used to compute Pmin; described as easily attainable with conventional equipment (Refs [65,66]).
  • Pattern parameters p_min, p_max, N, beta, gamma = Depend on design (e.g., UD-6: p_min=0.060, p_max=0.082, N=6, beta=1.0, gamma=1.23; OD-10: p_min=0.160, p_max=0.255…
    Parameters in Eqs. 8-9 are scanned and selected by ad-hoc seek algorithms to maximize bolometric performance; they are optimized within the model, not measured.
  • Bias parameters Ibias and Vbias = Ibias=10 uA; Vbias=40 mV (UD CVM), 6 mV (OD CVM)
    Bias current/voltage values used in Eqs. 11-12; Vbias values are chosen to maximize Pmax in CVM mode.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Empirical formulas Eqs. 1-5 describe the R(T) of homogeneous LSCO films over the relevant temperature range.
    The formulas are phenomenological fits to published measurements; the paper does not derive them from theory, and their validity for local 30nm patches is assumed.
  • domain assumption Each finite element behaves like a homogeneous film of the same local carrier density.
    Sect. 2.1 assigns to each simulation cell a single p and the corresponding homogeneous-film resistance; proximity and interface effects are neglected.
  • domain assumption Spatial carrier-density disorder is Gaussian with FWHM given by Eq. 7.
    Based on coarse-grained calculations and measurements in Refs [34,44,59]; assumed universal for all nominal p and for patterned films.
  • standard math The 200x200 mesh-current matrix method accurately computes the global resistance of the nonhomogeneous film.
    Finite-element mesh-current method; convergence was checked with a 400x400 mesh for a random selection of simulations.
  • domain assumption The TES thermal model Eq. 10 with constant G and Pself from Eqs. 11-12 describes the sensor's stationary state.
    Standard TES model from Refs [22,63,64]; assumes optical absorptivity eta=1 and a single thermal bath, ignoring spatial temperature variations in the film.
  • domain assumption Minimum detectable power is determined by a fixed relative resolution of 10^-4 in the readout.
    Pmin is not computed from a full noise model (phonon, Johnson, amplifier noise); it is a convenient comparison metric fixed in Sect. 2.3.
  • domain assumption The pattern family defined by Eqs. 8-9 contains the relevant optimal designs.
    The search space is restricted to monotonic slice-wise power-law profiles; other families (e.g., 2D patterns, non-monotonic zones) are not explored.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Design of structured La$_{2-x}$Sr$_{x}$CuO$_{4}$ films as superconducting transition-edge sensors at 4.2K." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DF5AIUTU

@misc{pith2026241119656,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Design of structured La$_2-x$Sr$_x$CuO$_4$ films as superconducting transition-edge sensors at 4.2K},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DF5AIUTU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.19656}
}
abstract

We calculate the effects of carrier-density structuration and patterning on thin films of the cuprate superconductor La$_{2-x}$Sr$_{x}$CuO$_{4}$, in order to optimize its functional characteristics as sensing material for resistive transition-edge bolometers at liquid-He temperature. We perform finite-element computations considering two major contributions to structuration: The intrinsic random nanoscale disorder associated to carrier density nonstoichiometry, plus the imposition of regular arrangements of zones with different nominal carrier densities. Using ad-hoc seek algorithms, we obtain various structuration designs that markedly improve the bolometric performance, mainly the saturation power and dynamic range. Bolometric operation becomes favorable even in the easier-to-implement constant current mode of measurement.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.19656 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Results for sensing films with nominal carrier densities in the underdoped (UD) range p <¯ 0.16. First row corresponds to a non-patterned film (N = 1). Subsequent rows correspond to films patterned with N = 6 and 10 zones of ¯p (following Eqs. 8 and 9 with parameter values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. In particular, Fig. 1(b) displays the computed sheet resistance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Results for films with nominal carrier densities in the underdoped (OD) range, ¯p > 0.16. Symbol meanings and panel organization are the same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: In particular, Fig. 1(f) displays the computed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_1.png]
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Comparison of the electrical resistivity (circles) measured by X. Shi and coauthors (taken from [45]) in a LSCO films with Tc of about 4.2 K, with our model equations (solid line). The Sr content estimated in [45] for this sample was about 0.07 and we employed carrier …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [42]

    Critical temperatures for superconduct- ing phase-coherence and condensation in La 2–xSrxCuO4

    N. Cot´ on, M.V. Ramallo, and F. Vidal, “Critical temperatures for superconduct- ing phase-coherence and condensation in La 2–xSrxCuO4”, arXiv: 1309.5910 [cond- mat.supr-con], pp. 1-16, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1309.5910

  2. [1]

    Sensing, Switching and Modulating Applications of a Superconducting THz Metamaterial,

    Z. Vafapour, M. Dutta, and M.A. Stroscio, “Sensing, Switching and Modulating Applications of a Superconducting THz Metamaterial,” IEEE Sensors Journal , vol. 21, pp. 15187-15195, 2021, doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2021.3073078. 20

  3. [2]

    The In-Plane Magnetic Field Measurement Method of SC/MR Mixed Sensor and Its Three-Axis Magnetic Sensor With Integrated Mag- netic Concentrator,

    L. Yang et al. , “The In-Plane Magnetic Field Measurement Method of SC/MR Mixed Sensor and Its Three-Axis Magnetic Sensor With Integrated Mag- netic Concentrator,” IEEE Sensors Journal , vol. 23, pp. 240-246, 2023, doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2022.3221721

  4. [3]

    Field Analysis for Superconducting Grounded Coplanar Waveguide Transmission Lines,

    M. H. Amini, A. Ghorbani, and A. Abdipour, “Field Analysis for Superconducting Grounded Coplanar Waveguide Transmission Lines,” IEEE Sensors Journal , vol. 24, pp. 8064-8070, 2024, doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2024.3358009

  5. [4]

    Superconducting transition edge bolometer for high-flux neutron detection,

    M.B. Brock, E.V. Østergaard, M. Busi et al. , “Superconducting transition edge bolometer for high-flux neutron detection,” Sci. Rep. , vol. 13, pp. 22266-1–16, 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49469-4

  6. [5]

    Laser nanostructured metasurfaces in Nb supercon- ducting thin films,

    A. Bad ´ ıa-Maj´ oset al. , “Laser nanostructured metasurfaces in Nb supercon- ducting thin films,” Appl. Surf. Sci. , vol. 649, pp. 159164-1–12, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.159164

  7. [6]

    Counting near-infrared single-photons with 95% efficiency,

    A.E. Lita, A.J. Miller, and S.W. Nam, “Counting near-infrared single-photons with 95% efficiency,” Optics Express , vol. 16, pp. 3032-3040, 2008, doi: 10.1364/OE.16.003032

  8. [7]

    Review of superconducting transition-edge sensors for x-ray and gamma-ray spectroscopy,

    J.N. Ullom, and D.A. Bennett, “Review of superconducting transition-edge sensors for x-ray and gamma-ray spectroscopy,” Supercond. Sci. Technol. , vol. 28, pp. 084003-1–36, 2015, doi: 10.1088/0953-2048/28/8/084003

Show all 61 references
  1. [8]

    Bolometers for infrared and millimeter waves,

    P.L. Richards, “Bolometers for infrared and millimeter waves,” J. Appl. Phys. , vol. 76, pp. 1-24, 1994, doi: 10.1063/1.357128

  2. [9]

    Frequency multiplexed superconducting quantum interfer- ence device readout of large bolometer arrays for cosmic microwave back- ground measurements,

    M. Dobbs et al. , “Frequency multiplexed superconducting quantum interfer- ence device readout of large bolometer arrays for cosmic microwave back- ground measurements,” Rev. Sci. Instr. , vol. 83, pp. 073113-1–25, 2012, doi: 10.1063/1.4737629

  3. [10]

    Phase- resolved Crab studies with a cryogenic transition-edge sensor spectrophotometer,

    R.W. Romani, A.J. Miller, B. Cabrera, S.W. Nam, and J.M. Martinis, “Phase- resolved Crab studies with a cryogenic transition-edge sensor spectrophotometer,” ApJ, vol. 563, pp. 221–228, 2001, doi: 10.1086/323874. 21

  4. [11]

    Transition-edge sensor detectors for the Origins space telescope,

    P.C. Nagler, J.E. Sadleir, and E.J. Wollack, “Transition-edge sensor detectors for the Origins space telescope,” J. Astron. Telesc. Instrum. Syst., vol. 71, pp. 011005- 1–18, 2021, doi: 10.1117/1.JATIS.7.1.011005

  5. [12]

    HA WC+, the far-infrared camera and polarimeter for SOFIA,

    D.A. Harper et al. , “HA WC+, the far-infrared camera and polarimeter for SOFIA,” J. Astron. Instrum. , vol. 7, pp. 1840008-1–41, 2018, doi: 10.1142/S2251171718400081

  6. [13]

    Development of space optimized TES bolometer arrays for LiteBIRD,

    G.C. Jaehnig et al. , “Development of space optimized TES bolometer arrays for LiteBIRD,” J. Low Temp. Phys., vol. 199, pp. 646-653, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10909- 020-02425-2

  7. [14]

    Superconducting transition edge bolometer for high-flux neutron detec- tion,

    M.B. Brock, E.V. Østergaard, M. Busi, A.C. Wulff, A.B. Abrahamsen, and L.T. Kuhn, “Superconducting transition edge bolometer for high-flux neutron detec- tion,” Scientific Reports, vol. 13, pp. 22266-1–15, 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41598-023- 49469-4

  8. [15]

    How good must single photon sources and detectors be for efficient linear optical quantum computation?,

    M. Varnava, D.E. Browne, and T. Rudolp, “How good must single photon sources and detectors be for efficient linear optical quantum computation?,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 100, pp. 060502-1–4, 2008, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.060502

  9. [16]

    Single-photon detection using high-temperature superconduc- tors,

    I. Charaev et al. , “Single-photon detection using high-temperature superconduc- tors,” Nat. Nanotechnol. , vol. 18, pp. 343-349, 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41565-023- 01325-2

  10. [17]

    Superconducting single-photon detectors get hot,

    J. Chang, and I.E. Zadeh, “Superconducting single-photon detectors get hot,” Nat. Nanotechnol., vol. 18, pp. 322-323, 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41565-023-01334-1

  11. [18]

    An application of electrothermal feedback for high resolution cryo- genic particle detection,

    K.D. Irwin, “An application of electrothermal feedback for high resolution cryo- genic particle detection,” Appl. Phys. Lett. , vol. 66, pp. 1998-2000, 1995, doi: 10.1063/1.113674

  12. [19]

    All metal organic deposited high- Tc superconducting transition edge bolometer on yttria- stabilized zirconia substrate,

    R. Mohajeri, Y.A. Opata, A.C. Wulff, J.C. Grivel, and M. Fardmanesh, “All metal organic deposited high- Tc superconducting transition edge bolometer on yttria- stabilized zirconia substrate,” J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. , vol. 30, pp. 1981-1986, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10948-016-3805-7. 22

  13. [20]

    Low noise high- Tc superconducting bolometers on silicon nitride membranes for far-infrared detection,

    M.J.M.E. de Nivelle et al. , “Low noise high- Tc superconducting bolometers on silicon nitride membranes for far-infrared detection,” J. Appl. Phys. , vol. 82, pp. 4719-4726, 1997, doi: 10.1063/1.366327

  14. [21]

    YBa2Cu3O7−δ quasioptical detectors for fast time-domain analy- sis of terahertz synchrotron radiation,

    P. Probst et al., “YBa2Cu3O7−δ quasioptical detectors for fast time-domain analy- sis of terahertz synchrotron radiation,” Appl. Phys. Lett. , vol. 98, pp. 043504-1–4, 2011, doi: 10.1063/1.3546173

  15. [22]

    Nonlinearity and electrothermal feedback of high Tc transition edge bolometers,

    H. Neff et al., “Nonlinearity and electrothermal feedback of high Tc transition edge bolometers,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 76, pp. 640-642, 2000, doi: 10.1063/1.125844

  16. [23]

    Noise, bolometric performance and aging of thin high Tc super- conducting films on silicon membranes,

    H. Neff et al. , “Noise, bolometric performance and aging of thin high Tc super- conducting films on silicon membranes,” Thin Solid Films , vol. 324, pp. 230-238, 1998, doi: 10.1016/S0040-6090(98)00369-1

  17. [24]

    Cal- culations of some doping nanostructurations and patterns improving the func- tionality of high-temperature superconductors for bolometer device applications,

    J.C. Verde, A.S. Viz, M.M. Botana, C. Montero-Orille, and M.V. Ramallo, “Cal- culations of some doping nanostructurations and patterns improving the func- tionality of high-temperature superconductors for bolometer device applications,” Nanomaterials, vol. 10, pp. 97-1–20, 202...

  18. [25]

    Probing nanoscale oxygen ion motion in memristive systems,

    Y. Yang, X. Zhang, L. Qin, Q. Zeng, X. Qiu, and R. Huang, “Probing nanoscale oxygen ion motion in memristive systems,” Nat. Comm. , vol. 8, pp. 15173-1–10, 2017, doi: 10.1038/ncomms15173

  19. [26]

    Superconducting nanostructures grown by focused ion beam induced deposition

    I. Garc ´ ıa-Serranoet al. , “Superconducting nanostructures grown by focused ion beam induced deposition”, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Nano Confined Superconductors and Their Application, Garmish, Germany, 3-7 Septem- ber 2016

  20. [27]

    Nanostructured superconductors,

    W. Lang, “Nanostructured superconductors,” in: T. Chakraborty (Ed.) Encyclo- pedia of condensed matter physics (2nd Ed.) , Academic Press, Oxford, 2024, pp. 368-380. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-323-90800-9.00014-7

  21. [28]

    High temperature superconducting bolometer,

    U.P. Oppenheim, M. Katz, G. Koren, E. Polturak, and M.R. Fishman, “High temperature superconducting bolometer,” Physica C , vol. 178, pp. 26-28, 1991, doi: 10.1016/0921-4534(91)90153-P. 23

  22. [30]

    Anomalous criticality in the electrical resistivity of La 2–xSrxCuO4,

    R.A. Cooper et al. , “Anomalous criticality in the electrical resistivity of La 2–xSrxCuO4,” Science, vol. 323, pp. 603-606, 2009, doi: 10.1126/sci- ence.1165015

  23. [31]

    Effect of radiation-induced defects on the superfluid density and optical conductivity of overdoped La 2−xSrxCuO4,

    F. Mahmood, D. Ingram, J.A. Clayhold, I. Boˇ zovi´ c, and N.P. Armitage, “Effect of radiation-induced defects on the superfluid density and optical conductivity of overdoped La 2−xSrxCuO4,” Phys. Rev. B , vol. 105, pp. 174501-1–8, 2022, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.174501

  24. [32]

    Probing the phase diagram of cuprates with YBa 2Cu3O7−δ thin films and nanowires,

    R. Arpaia, E. Andersson, E. Trabaldo, T. Bauch, and F. Lombardi, “Probing the phase diagram of cuprates with YBa 2Cu3O7−δ thin films and nanowires,” Phys. Rev. Mater. , vol. 2, pp. 024804-1–12, 2018, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevMateri- als.2.024804

  25. [33]

    Transport and structure of ion irradiated HTSC thin films,

    O. Meyer et al. , “Transport and structure of ion irradiated HTSC thin films,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. , vol. 65, pp. 539-545, 1992, doi: 10.1016/0168- 583X(92)95101-V

  26. [35]

    Masked ion beam irradiation of high-temperature superconduc- tors: patterning of nano-size regions with high point-defect density,

    W. Lang et al. , “Masked ion beam irradiation of high-temperature superconduc- tors: patterning of nano-size regions with high point-defect density,” Int. J. Nan- otechnol, vol. 6, pp. 704-714, 2009, doi: 10.1504/IJNT.2009.025308

  27. [36]

    Vortex matching at 6T in YBa2Cu3O7−δ thin films by imprinting a 20-nm periodic pinning array with a focused helium-ion beam,

    M. Karrer et al., “Vortex matching at 6T in YBa2Cu3O7−δ thin films by imprinting a 20-nm periodic pinning array with a focused helium-ion beam,” Phys. Rev. A , vol. 22, pp. 014043-1–11, 2024, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.22.014043. 24

  28. [37]

    Using electron irradiation to probe iron-based superconductors,

    K. Cho, M. Ko´ nczykowski, S. Teknowijoyo, M.A. Tanatar, and R. Prozorov, “Using electron irradiation to probe iron-based superconductors,” Supercond. Sci. Tech- nol., vol. 31, pp. 064002-1–19, 2018, doi: 10.1088/1361-6668/aabfa8

  29. [39]

    Machining oxide thin films with an atomic force microscope: Pattern and object formation on the nanometer scale,

    J.P. Killgore, W. King, K. Kjoller, R.M. Overney, “Machining oxide thin films with an atomic force microscope: Pattern and object formation on the nanometer scale,” Microscopy Today, vol. 15, pp. 20-25, 2007, doi: 10.1017/S1551929500051142

  30. [40]

    Universal sheet resistance and revised phase diagram of the cuprate high-temperature superconductors,

    N. Bariˇ si´ cet al. , “Universal sheet resistance and revised phase diagram of the cuprate high-temperature superconductors,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. , vol. 110, pp. 12235-12240, 2013, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1301989110

  31. [44]

    Synthesis from separate oxide targets of high quality La 2−xSrxCuO4 thin films and dependence with doping of their superconducting transition width,

    N. Cot´ on, B. Mercey, J. Mosqueira, M.V. Ramallo, and F. Vidal, “Synthesis from separate oxide targets of high quality La 2−xSrxCuO4 thin films and dependence with doping of their superconducting transition width,” Supercond. Sci. Technol., vol. 26, pp. 075011-1–11, 2013, doi...

  32. [45]

    Emer- 25 gence of superconductivity from the dynamically heterogeneous insulating state in La2−xSrxCuO4,

    X. Shi, Ph.D. dissertation. Florida State University (2012). See also: X. Shi, G. Logvenov, A.T. Bollinger, I. Boˇ zovi´ c, C. Panagopoulos, and D. Popovi´ c, “Emer- 25 gence of superconductivity from the dynamically heterogeneous insulating state in La2−xSrxCuO4,” Nat. Mater....

  33. [46]

    The elec- tronic specific heat of cuprate superconductors,

    J.W. Loram, K.A. Mirza, J.M. Wade, J.R. Cooper, and W.Y. Liang, “The elec- tronic specific heat of cuprate superconductors,” Physica C, vol. 235-240, pp. 134- 137, 1994, doi: 10.1016/0921-4534(94)91331-5

  34. [47]

    A scenario for the critical fluctuations near the transition of few-bilayer films of high-temperature cuprate superconductors,

    M.M. Botana and M.V. Ramallo, “A scenario for the critical fluctuations near the transition of few-bilayer films of high-temperature cuprate superconductors,” Nanomaterials, vol. 12, pp. 4368-1–17, 2022, doi: 10.3390/nano12244368

  35. [48]

    Hid- den quantum spin-gap state in the static stripe phase of high-temperature La2−xSrxCuO4 superconductors,

    M. Kofu, S.-H. Lee, M. Fujita, H.-J. Kang, H. Eisaki, and K. Yamada, “Hid- den quantum spin-gap state in the static stripe phase of high-temperature La2−xSrxCuO4 superconductors,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 102, pp. 047001-1–4, 2009, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.047001

  36. [49]

    Doping dependence of the spatially modulated dynamical spin correlations and the superconducting-transition temperature in La 2−xSrxCuO4,

    K. Yamada et al., “Doping dependence of the spatially modulated dynamical spin correlations and the superconducting-transition temperature in La 2−xSrxCuO4,” Phys. Rev. B , vol. 57, pp. 6165-6172, 1998, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.6165

  37. [50]

    Strain-relaxation and critical thickness of epitaxial La 1.85Sr0.15CuO4 films,

    T.L. Meyer, L. Jiang, S. Park, T. Egami, and H.N. Lee, “Strain-relaxation and critical thickness of epitaxial La 1.85Sr0.15CuO4 films,” APL Materials , vol. 3, pp. 126102-1–6, 2015, doi: 10.1063/1.4937170

  38. [51]

    The conductivity and the magnetization around Tc in optimally- doped YBa2Cu3O7−δ revisited: quantitative analysis in terms of fluctuating super- conducting pairs,

    R.I. Rey et al., “The conductivity and the magnetization around Tc in optimally- doped YBa2Cu3O7−δ revisited: quantitative analysis in terms of fluctuating super- conducting pairs,” Supercond. Sci. Technol., vol. 32, pp. 045009-1–21, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1361-6668/aafe93

  39. [52]

    Fluctuation- induced diamagnetism above the superconducting transition in MgB2,

    J. Mosqueira, M.V. Ramallo, S.R. Curr´ as, C. Torr´ on, and F. Vidal, “Fluctuation- induced diamagnetism above the superconducting transition in MgB2,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 65, pp. 174522-1–7, 2002, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.174522. 26

  40. [53]

    Fluctuation-induced diamagnetism in bulk isotropic superconductors at high re- duced temperatures,

    C. Carballeira, J. Mosqueira, M.V. Ramallo, J.A. Veira, and F. Vidal, “Fluctuation-induced diamagnetism in bulk isotropic superconductors at high re- duced temperatures,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter , vol. 13, pp. 9271-9279, 2001, doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/13/41/316

  41. [54]

    Phenomenological model of the copper oxide superconductors,

    R.A. Klemm, “Phenomenological model of the copper oxide superconductors,” Phys. Rev. B , vol. 41, pp. 2073-2097, 1990, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.41.2073

  42. [55]

    Critical fluctuation conductivity in layered superconduc- tors in a strong electric field,

    I. Puica and W. Lang, “Critical fluctuation conductivity in layered superconduc- tors in a strong electric field,” Phys. Rev. B , vol. 68, pp. 054517-1–11, 2003, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.054517

  43. [56]

    Paraconductivity at high reduced temperatures in YBa 2Cu3O7−δ super- conductors,

    C. Carballeira, S.R. Curr´ as, J. Vi˜ na, J.A. Veira, M.V. Ramallo, and F. Vi- dal, “Paraconductivity at high reduced temperatures in YBa 2Cu3O7−δ super- conductors,” Phys. Rev. B , vol. 63, pp. 144515-1–7, 2001, doi: 10.1103/Phys- RevB.63.144515

  44. [57]

    Phenomenology of the normal state in-plane transport properties of high-Tc cuprates,

    N.E. Hussey, “Phenomenology of the normal state in-plane transport properties of high-Tc cuprates,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter , vol. 20, pp. 123201-1–17, 2008, doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/20/12/123201

  45. [58]

    Crit- ical and Gaussian fluctuation effects in the specific heat and conductivity of high-Tc superconductors,

    J.W. Loram, J.R. Cooper, J.M. Wheatley, K.A. Mirza, and R.S. Liu, “Crit- ical and Gaussian fluctuation effects in the specific heat and conductivity of high-Tc superconductors,” Philos. Mag. B , vol. 65, pp. 1405–1417, 1992, doi: 10.1080/13642819208215108

  46. [59]

    Optical experimental evidence for a universal length scale for the dynamic charge inhomogeneity of cuprate superconductors,

    D. Mihailovic, “Optical experimental evidence for a universal length scale for the dynamic charge inhomogeneity of cuprate superconductors,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 94, pp. 207001-1–4, 2005, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.207001

  47. [60]

    A kilopixel array of TES bolometers for ACT: Development, testing, and first light,

    M.D. Niemack et al., “A kilopixel array of TES bolometers for ACT: Development, testing, and first light,” J. Low Temp. Phys. , vol. 151, pp. 690–696, 2008, doi: 10.1007/s10909-008-9729-2

  48. [61]

    Demonstration of a low-noise near-infrared photon counter with multiphoton discrimination,

    A.J. Miller, S.W. Nam, J.M. Martinis, and A.V. Sergienko, “Demonstration of a low-noise near-infrared photon counter with multiphoton discrimination,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 83, pp. 791-793, 2003, doi: 10.1063/1.1596723. 27

  49. [62]

    Transparency of a YBa2Cu3O7−δ film/substrate interface for thermal phonons measured by means of voltage response to radiation,

    A.V. Sergeev et al., “Transparency of a YBa2Cu3O7−δ film/substrate interface for thermal phonons measured by means of voltage response to radiation,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 49, pp. 9091-9096, 1994, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.9091

  50. [63]

    Calibration of transition-edge sensor (TES) bolometer arrays with application to CLASS,

    J.W. Appel et al. , “Calibration of transition-edge sensor (TES) bolometer arrays with application to CLASS,” ApJS, vol. 262, pp. 52-1–15, 2022, doi: 10.3847/1538- 4365/ac8cf2

  51. [64]

    Superconductive bolometers and calorimeters,

    H. Kraus, “Superconductive bolometers and calorimeters,” Supercond. Sci. Tech- nol., vol. 9, pp. 827-842, 1996, doi: 10.1088/0953-2048/9/10/001

  52. [65]

    Absolute power measurement with transition edge sensors and SQUID amplifier,

    D. Fukuda et al. , “Absolute power measurement with transition edge sensors and SQUID amplifier,” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. , vol. 43, pp. 1315-1318, 2006, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/43/1/321

  53. [66]

    Superconductive bolometers for submillimeter wavelengths,

    J. Clarke, G.I. Hoffer, P.L. Richards, and N.-H. Yeh, “Superconductive bolometers for submillimeter wavelengths,” J. Appl. Phys. , vol. 48, pp. 4865-4879, 1977, doi: 10.1063/1.323612. 28

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.