Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 minor 130 references

Below threshold nonsequential double ionization with linearly polarized two-color fields I: symmetry and dominance

T0 review · 0 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Tuning the phase of a two-color laser field shifts the second electron's most likely momentum away from zero and can confine RESI distributions to specific quadrants of the parallel-momentum plane.

desk verdict A solid, well-scoped SFA mechanism study that identifies a genuine two-color control handle for RESI momentum distributions; the confinement result is real within the model, and the authors are upfront about the Coulomb caveat. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.19658 v2 pith:OMXNMRH3 submitted 2024-11-29 physics.atom-ph quant-ph

S. Hashim , D. Habibović , C. Figueira de Morisson Faria This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-phquant-ph PACS 32.80.Rm
keywords nonsequentialdoubleionizationrecollision-excitationwithsubsequentstrong-fieldapproximationtwo-colorlaserfieldsfieldsymmetriescorrelatedelectronmomentumdistributionssaddle-pointmethodsbelow-threshold
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the symmetries of a linearly polarized two-color laser field determine which recollision-excitation-with-subsequent-ionization (RESI) events dominate below-threshold nonsequential double ionization, and that the relative phase between the two waves can be used to steer the correlated electron momentum distribution. The key difference from monochromatic fields is that a field extremum no longer coincides with a zero of the vector potential, so the second electron's most probable parallel momentum, set by the mapping $p_{2\parallel}=-A(t)$, moves away from the axes. For an $(\omega,3\omega)$ field with phase $\pi/2$ the distribution is confined to the second and fourth quadrants; with phase $-\pi/2$, to the first and third. If the claim holds, frequency ratio and relative phase become control knobs for confining electron-electron correlated emission to chosen momentum regions, which matters for isolating dominant quantum paths and for later interference studies.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the saddle-point equation $[p_2+A(t)]^2=-2E_{2e}$ for the second electron, which in the classical limit $E_{2e}\to 0$ reduces to the mapping $p_{2\parallel}=-A(t)$. This mapping fixes the centre of the second electron's parallel-momentum distribution at the vector potential evaluated at its complex ionization time, and it is what turns a nonvanishing $A(t)$ at field extrema into momentum distributions displaced from the axes. Around this mapping, the paper organizes the events using the three temporal symmetries of a monochromatic field: half-cycle translation followed by reflection, reflection about field extrema, and reflection about zero crossings followed by reflection. It classifies dominant orbits $P_{n\mu}$ and $O_{n\mu}$ using field tangents near extrema and returns near zero crossings. The transition amplitude is the SFA RESI amplitude with ionization, recollision-excitation, and second-ionization prefactors; a Gaussian basis is used for length-gauge prefactors where the hydrogenic expressions become singular.

What would settle it

Use a time-dependent Schrödinger equation, or a classical-trajectory calculation with the full Coulomb potential, for argon driven by an $(\omega,3\omega)$ field at $\xi=0.8$, $\phi=\pi/2$, $6\times10^{13}$ W/cm$^2$, 800 nm, in the below-threshold regime, and check whether the correlated parallel-momentum distribution is confined to the second and fourth quadrants with suppressed axes; if the signal spreads across the axes or shifts toward $p_{2\parallel}=0$, the neglected long-range potential has broken the mapping and the confinement claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that for a bichromatic field with commensurate frequencies, a sufficiently intense second wave makes the vector potential nonvanishing at the times when the electric field is extremal. Since the saddle-point equation for the second electron gives the classical-limit mapping $p_{2\parallel}=-A(t)$, the maxima of the RESI momentum distributions move off the $p_{n\parallel}=0$ axes, and the distributions can be confined to specific quadrants of the $p_{1\parallel}p_{2\parallel}$ plane. Concretely, an $(\omega,3\omega)$ field with relative phase $\pi/2$ yields distributions in the second and fourth quadrants, while $-\pi/2$ yields the first and third; more than one ionization event per half cycle can contribute, and a hierarchy of dominance is found in which tunneling probability around the field extrema outweighs excursion time, which in turn outweighs the size of the classically allowed region. The fourfold symmetry of the distributions survives only when the half-cycle, reflection-about-extrema, and reflection-about-crossings symmetries are all retained, as for $(\omega,3\omega)$ with $\phi=0$; otherwise only reflection about the main diagonal remains. These predictions are made within the strong-field approximation and for incoherent sums over events, with symmetrization over electron exchange.

Load-bearing premise

The predicted momentum shifts and quadrant confinement rest on the mapping $p_{2\parallel}=-A(t)$, which holds only when the ion's long-range Coulomb force is negligible while the second electron travels to the detector; if that force is significant, the distributions could shift or smear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For an $(\omega,3\omega)$ field with $\phi=\pi/2$, the correlated RESI distribution sits in the second and fourth quadrants, while $\phi=-\pi/2$ moves it to the first and third quadrants, with strong suppression near the axes.
  • For an $(\omega,2\omega)$ field, which lacks half-cycle symmetry, the distributions become L-shaped along the positive half-axes at $\phi=\pi/2$ and move to the second and fourth quadrants at $\phi=\pi$, showing that symmetry breaking alone does not determine the occupied region.
  • When the half-cycle symmetry is retained, the distributions are symmetric about both diagonals $p_{1\parallel}=\pm p_{2\parallel}$; when it is broken, only the main-diagonal reflection remains.
  • Event dominance follows a hierarchy: the tunneling probability near the relevant field extrema is most important, then the electron's excursion time in the continuum, and finally the extent of the classically allowed region.
  • Because $A(t)$ is nonvanishing at the dominant ionization times, the velocity- and length-gauge prefactors for the second electron can give different distributions, so gauge choice must be handled explicitly for two-color fields.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the $p_{2\parallel}=-A(t)$ mapping survives Coulomb corrections in some parameter window, the predicted quadrant confinement could serve as a direct experimental diagnostic: deviations from the quadrants would quantify how much the long-range ion potential accelerates the second electron during continuum propagation.
  • The symmetry rules should generalize to other commensurate frequency pairs, since the parity of $r+s$ controls the half-cycle symmetry; this suggests a design rule for choosing $(r,s,\phi)$ to place RESI signal in a desired quadrant.
  • Because the paper deliberately uses incoherent sums, including coherent superpositions of the now-overlapping dominant events is the natural next test; quantum interference could either sharpen or erase the quadrant signatures, depending on whether the phase differences from the semiclassical action dominate.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper investigates below-threshold nonsequential double ionization driven by linearly polarized two-color fields, focusing on the recollision-excitation with subsequent ionization (RESI) mechanism. Using the strong-field approximation and starting from the RESI transition amplitude of Shaaran et al., the authors derive saddle-point equations, classify the temporal symmetries of (ω,3ω) and (ω,2ω) fields, identify the dominant first-electron orbit pairs and second-electron ionization events, and compute incoherent correlated momentum distributions with and without prefactors. The central physical observation is that, for bichromatic fields with a sufficiently strong second wave, the vector potential at the relevant ionization extrema is generically nonzero, so the second-electron momentum distributions peak away from p2∥=0 and can be confined to specific quadrants of the parallel momentum plane (e.g., second/fourth quadrants for (ω,3ω) with phase π/2, first/third quadrants for phase −π/2, and near the positive half-axes or first quadrant for the (ω,2ω) cases studied). The paper also addresses gauge dependence of the second-electron ionization prefactor and explicitly restricts its claims to the SFA and to incoherent sums over events.

Significance. If judged at the level of the SFA-based model, the paper is a solid and useful contribution. It extends quantum-orbit and symmetry analyses of RESI from monochromatic and few-cycle fields to commensurate two-color fields, identifies a qualitatively new effect (nonvanishing vector potential at ionization extrema shifting and confining the RESI spectra), and provides an explicit event hierarchy. The manuscript has clear strengths: there are no fitted parameters; all field ratios, phases, and energies are stated inputs; the diagrammatic event maps in Fig. 6 make the predictions concrete; the authors calculate both with and without prefactors and disclose the length/velocity gauge subtleties; and the main limitation (neglect of the long-range Coulomb potential in the continuum, i.e., the range of validity of p2∥=−A(t)) is acknowledged in Sec. V. For these reasons the central derivation is internally consistent. The confinement prediction is falsifiable by future TDSE or Coulomb-corrected calculations and directly motivates the companion interference paper.

minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. V / Abstract] The word "confined" overstates what the calculation shows: Fig. 4(e) indicates that the subdominant second-electron events O1a,b are only roughly an order of magnitude lower in probability than the dominant O2a,b events, and those subdominant events populate the complementary quadrants. Please qualify the conclusion as "dominantly confined" or provide a quantitative estimate of the yield outside the claimed quadrant region, so that the truncation to dominant events is not read as exact confinement.
  2. [Sec. V] The final paragraph correctly notes that the mapping p2∥=−A(t) only holds if the long-range potential is negligible in the continuum. This is a real boundary of applicability rather than an internal inconsistency, but it would help readers if the abstract or conclusions stated explicitly that the confinement prediction is an SFA-level prediction that may be displaced or washed out when Coulomb distortion of the second electron is included.
  3. [Sec. IV A] The text says that the distributions are "fully incoherent" while also stating that the two saddle-point solutions of a single pair are combined coherently using the uniform approximation. Please clarify that "incoherent" refers to sums over different events and over the two symmetrization contributions only, and that the within-pair combination is a technical device to remove artificial peaks.
  4. [Sec. II D] The phrase "deepest bound state" for the 3s→3p excitation channel is misleading; since E2e labels an excited state of the singly charged ion, it should read "most tightly bound excited state" or "deepest excited state."
  5. [Sec. II D] The term "below threshold" is used in the title and introduction but the parameter regime is never quantified. A sentence stating that at 6×10^13 W/cm2 and 800 nm the maximum rescattering energy (about 3.17Up) lies below the second ionization potential but above the excitation threshold would make the scope of the paper easier to judge.
  6. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors, such as "lineary polarized fied" preceding Eq. (11) and "th present discussion" in Sec. III B. A careful proofreading pass is recommended.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the SFA derivation is self-contained, and self-citations are prior published derivations with stated assumptions, not assumed results.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain runs from the stated SFA transition amplitude (Eq. (1)), the saddle-point equations (7)-(10), and the specified bichromatic field (Eq. (16)) to the computed momentum distributions (Figs. 7-10). No quantity is fitted to a subset of data and then predicted elsewhere; the field ratios, phases, intensities, and bound-state energies are all stated inputs. The central mapping p2|| = -A(t) is the E2e -> 0 limit of Eq. (10), so the 'prediction' that maxima shift away from the axes is a direct consequence of the model's own saddle-point equations, not an independently fitted parameter renamed as a result. Self-citations to [73], [100], [102], and [105] supply the transition amplitude and symmetry classification, but these are published derivations with stated SFA assumptions that do not include the confinement result claimed here; they are real evidence rather than circular bootstrapping. The paper explicitly flags the free-continuum limitation of the mapping, the restriction to incoherent sums, and the Coulomb caveat, so the scope of the claim is transparent. I find no step in which an input is re-labeled as a prediction or in which a load-bearing conclusion rests solely on an unverified self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the SFA transition amplitude, the p2|| = -A(t) classical mapping, a truncation to selected dominant events, and a restriction to incoherent sums. The field parameters (frequency ratio, intensity ratio, phase, wavelength) are chosen by hand, not fitted to data. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • field-strength ratio xi = E_somega/E_romega = 0.8
    Chosen for all figures; the momentum shifts and event dominance depend on this ratio and the paper does not map the full dependence.
  • relative phase phi = 0, +/-pi/2, 3pi/4, pi depending on case
    Scanned by hand to break or retain field symmetries; the confinement to specific quadrants is phase-specific.
  • frequency ratio (r,s) = (1,2) and (1,3)
    The two commensurate ratios studied; r+s even versus odd determines which field symmetries survive.
  • fundamental intensity and wavelength = 6e13 W/cm^2, 800 nm
    Fixed argon parameters quoted for all figures.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The RESI transition amplitude in Eq. (1) is an adequate model for below-threshold double ionization.
    The amplitude is taken from prior work [105] and neglects residual binding potentials in the continuum; the paper argues SFA is a suitable testing ground but acknowledges this is an approximation.
  • domain assumption The continuum dynamics of the second electron are free, so p2|| is centered at -A(t).
    Saddle-point equation (10) in the E2e -> 0 limit gives p2 = -A(t); the authors state in the Conclusions that this mapping only holds if long-range potentials are neglected and could fail if Coulomb acceleration is significant.
  • ad hoc to paper Only the two most dominant first-electron orbit pairs and the second-electron ionization events in the subsequent half cycle contribute.
    Event selection uses Im[t] and excursion times (Sec. III); other events are stated to be orders of magnitude smaller, but the distributions are not converged against the full sum.
  • domain assumption Second-electron ionization events later than one half-cycle after rescattering are negligible due to bound-state depletion.
    Used in Sec. III A to restrict events; no depletion dynamics are modeled.
  • ad hoc to paper Incoherent sums over events and symmetrization contributions are sufficient for the claims.
    Quantum interference is intentionally left out (Sec. II C and Conclusions); the companion paper II addresses coherent sums, so the present conclusions are limited to the incoherent case.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Below threshold nonsequential double ionization with linearly polarized two-color fields I: symmetry and dominance." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OMXNMRH3

@misc{pith2026241119658,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Below threshold nonsequential double ionization with linearly polarized two-color fields I: symmetry and dominance},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OMXNMRH3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.19658}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate laser-induced nonsequential double ionization with linearly polarized bichromatic fields, focusing on the recollision-excitation with subsequent ionization (RESI) mechanism. Using the strong-field approximation, we assess how the symmetries of the field influence the dominant events. Furthermore, we show that, by manipulating the field parameters such as the field frequencies and relative phase between the two driving waves, one can influence the correlated electron-momentum distributions. Specific features of a linearly polarized bichromatic field are that the momentum distributions of the second electron are no longer centered around vanishing momenta and that there may be more than one ionization event per half cycle. This can be used to confine the RESI distributions to specific momentum regions and to determine a hierarchy of parameters that make an event dominant.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.19658 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Electric field (black solid line) and the corresponding vector potential (orange dashed line) as functions of time for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Real parts of the rescattering time calculated for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Real parts of the rescattering time calculated for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Imaginary part of the ionization time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Imaginary part of the ionization time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Diagrammatic representation of the dominant events [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Incoherent momentum distributions without prefactors calculated for the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Incoherent momentum distributions with prefactors in the velocity gauge calculated using hydrogenic wavefunctions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Incoherent momentum distributions with prefactors in the length gauge calculated using Gaussian wavefunctions and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Incoherent momentum distributions without prefactors (first column), with hydrogenic prefactors in the velocity gauge [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Incoherent momentum distributions with prefactors in the velocity gauge calculated using Gaussian wavefunctions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Incoherent momentum distributions with prefactors in the length gauge calculated using Gaussian wavefunctions and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_12.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

130 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    For the velocity gauge, we neglect the vector potential A(t)

    Prefactor using Gaussian basis Using a linear combination of Gaussian-type orbitals (GTOs) to represent the radial part of the wavefunction, the ionization prefactor can be written as: Vp2e =(−i)le ple 2 2(−1.5−le)Y 0 le (θp2 , ϕp2 ) NX i=1 α−1−le i ci Γ(1 +l e) Γ( 3 2 +l e) 1F1 1 +l e; 3 2 +l e;− p2 2 4αi , (A1) where θp2 = cos−1(q2), (A2) p2 = q [p2∥ +A...

  2. [2]

    12), the shape of the vector potential 20 FIG

    Two-electron momentum distributions with real-time prefactors When only the real component of the ionization time tis taken (Fig. 12), the shape of the vector potential 20 FIG. 11. Incoherent momentum distributions with prefactors in the velocity gauge calculated using Gaussian wavefunctions and taking only the real part of the direct-electron ionization ...

  3. [3]

    (16) is complex, i.e.,t= Re[ωt] +iIm[ωt]

    Length-gauge prefactor using complex time Within the framework of the saddle-point method, the timetwhich appears in the vector potentialA(t) defined by Eq. (16) is complex, i.e.,t= Re[ωt] +iIm[ωt]. In this case, each of the cosine functions can be rewritten as cos(ωt) = cos(Re[ωt]) cosh(Im[ωt]) −isin(Re[ωt]) sinh(Im[ωt]).(A5) In Figs. 5 and 4, we have pr...

  4. [4]

    Brabec and F

    T. Brabec and F. Krausz, Intense few-cycle laser fields: Frontiers of nonlinear optics, Rev. Mod. Phys.72, 545 (2000)

    2000

  5. [5]

    Ehlotzky, Atomic phenomena in bichromatic laser fields, Phys

    F. Ehlotzky, Atomic phenomena in bichromatic laser fields, Phys. Rep.345, 175 (2001)

    2001

  6. [6]

    D. B. Miloˇ sevi´ c, G. G. Paulus, D. Bauer, and W. Becker, Above-threshold ionization by few-cycle pulses, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.39, R203 (2006)

    2006

  7. [7]

    Dudovich, O

    N. Dudovich, O. Smirnova, J. Levesque, Y. Mairesse, M. Y. Ivanov, D. M. Villeneuve, and P. B. Corkum, Measuring and controlling the birth of attosecond XUV pulses, Nat. Phys.2, 781 (2006)

    2006

  8. [8]

    Doumy, J

    G. Doumy, J. Wheeler, C. Roedig, R. Chirla, P. Agos- tini, and L. F. DiMauro, Attosecond synchronization of high-order harmonics from midinfrared drivers, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 093002 (2009)

    2009

Show all 130 references
  1. [9]

    J. M. Dahlstr¨ om, T. Fordell, E. Mansten, T. Ru- chon, M. Swoboda, K. Kl¨ under, M. Gisselbrecht, A. L’Huillier, and J. Mauritsson, Atomic and macro- scopic measurements of attosecond pulse trains, Phys. Rev. A80, 033836 (2009)

    2009

  2. [10]

    Eckle, A

    P. Eckle, A. N. Pfeiffer, C. Cirelli, A. Staudte, R. D¨ orner, H. G. Muller, M. B¨ uttiker, and U. Keller, Attosecond ionization and tunneling delay time mea- surements in helium, Science322, 1525 (2008)

    2008

  3. [11]

    A. N. Pfeiffer, C. Cirelli, M. Smolarski, D. Dimitrovski, M. Abu-samha, L. B. Madsen, and U. Keller, Attoclock reveals natural coordinates of the laser-induced tun- nelling current flow in atoms, Nat. Phys.8, 76 (2012)

    2012

  4. [12]

    A. N. Pfeiffer, C. Cirelli, A. S. Landsman, M. Smolarski, D. Dimitrovski, L. B. Madsen, and U. Keller, Probing the longitudinal momentum spread of the electron wave packet at the tunnel exit, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 083002 (2012)

    2012

  5. [13]

    M. Li, Y. Liu, H. Liu, Q. Ning, L. Fu, J. Liu, Y. Deng, C. Wu, L.-Y. Peng, and Q. Gong, Subcycle dynamics of Coulomb asymmetry in strong elliptical laser fields, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 023006 (2013)

    2013

  6. [14]

    I. A. Ivanov and A. S. Kheifets, Strong-field ionization of he by elliptically polarized light in attoclock configu- ration, Phys. Rev. A89, 021402 (2014)

    2014

  7. [15]

    A. S. Landsman, A. N. Pfeiffer, C. Hofmann, M. Smo- larski, C. Cirelli, and U. Keller, Rydberg state creation by tunnel ionization, New J. Phys.15, 013001 (2013)

    2013

  8. [16]

    Torlina, F

    L. Torlina, F. Morales, J. Kaushal, I. Ivanov, A. Kheifets, A. Zielinski, A. Scrinzi, H. G. Muller, S. Sukiasyan, M. Ivanov, and O. Smirnova, Interpret- ing attoclock measurements of tunnelling times, Nat. Phys.11, 503 (2015)

    2015

  9. [17]

    M. Han, P. Ge, Y. Shao, Q. Gong, and Y. Liu, Attoclock photoelectron interferometry with two-color corotating circular fields to probe the phase and the amplitude of emitting wave packets, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 073202 (2018)

    2018

  10. [18]

    Eicke and M

    N. Eicke and M. Lein, Attoclock with counter-rotating bicircular laser fields, Phys. Rev. A99, 031402 (2019)

    2019

  11. [19]

    Shafir, H

    D. Shafir, H. Soifer, B. D. Bruner, M. Da- gan, Y. Mairesse, S. Patchkovskii, M. Y. Ivanov, O. Smirnova, and N. Dudovich, Resolving the time when an electron exits a tunnelling barrier, Nature485, 343 (2012)

    2012

  12. [20]

    Zhao and M

    J. Zhao and M. Lein, Determination of ionization and tunneling times in high-order harmonic generation, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 043901 (2013)

    2013

  13. [21]

    Henkel and M

    J. Henkel and M. Lein, Analysis of electron trajectories with two-color strong-field ionization, Phys. Rev. A92, 013422 (2015)

    2015

  14. [22]

    Pedatzur, G

    O. Pedatzur, G. Orenstein, V. Serbinenko, H. Soifer, B. D. Bruner, A. J. Uzan, D. S. Brambila, A. G. Harvey, L. Torlina, F. Morales, O. Smirnova, and N. Dudovich, Attosecond tunnelling interferometry, Nat. Phys.11, 815 (2015)

    2015

  15. [23]

    Klaiber, K

    M. Klaiber, K. Z. Hatsagortsyan, and C. H. Keitel, Under-the-tunneling-barrier recollisions in strong-field ionization, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 013201 (2018)

    2018

  16. [24]

    Smirnova, Y

    O. Smirnova, Y. Mairesse, and S. Patchkovskii, Oppor- tunities for chiral discrimination using high harmonic generation in tailored laser fields, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.48, 234005 (2015)

    2015

  17. [25]

    Ayuso, P

    D. Ayuso, P. Decleva, S. Patchkovskii, and O. Smirnova, Chiral dichroism in bi-elliptical high-order harmonic generation, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.51, 06LT01 (2018)

    2018

  18. [26]

    Ayuso, P

    D. Ayuso, P. Decleva, S. Patchkovskii, and O. Smirnova, Strong-field control and enhancement of chiral response in bi-elliptical high-order harmonic generation: an an- alytical model, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.51, 124002 (2018)

    2018

  19. [27]

    Baykusheva and H

    D. Baykusheva and H. J. W¨ orner, Chiral discrimination through bielliptical high-harmonic spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. X8, 031060 (2018)

    2018

  20. [28]

    Habibovi´ c, K

    D. Habibovi´ c, K. R. Hamilton, O. Neufeld, and L. Rego, Emerging tailored light sources for studying chirality and symmetry, Nat. Rev. Phys.6, 663 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    J. M. Ngoko Djiokap, S. X. Hu, L. B. Madsen, N. L. Manakov, A. V. Meremianin, and A. F. Starace, Elec- tron Vortices in Photoionization by Circularly Polarized Attosecond Pulses, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 113004 (2015)

    2015

  22. [30]

    Bayer, C

    T. Bayer, C. Philipp, K. Eickhoff, and M. Wollen- haupt, Atomic photoionization dynamics in ultrashort cycloidal laser fields, Phys. Rev. A102, 013104 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    Y. Kang, E. Pisanty, M. Ciappina, M. Lewenstein, C. Figueira de Morisson Faria, and A. S. Maxwell, Con- servation laws for electron vortices in strong-field ioni- 23 sation, Eur. Phys. J. D75, 199 (2021)

    2021

  24. [32]

    A. S. Maxwell, G. S. J. Armstrong, M. F. Ciappina, E. Pisanty, Y. Kang, A. C. Brown, M. Lewenstein, and C. Figueira de Morisson Faria, Manipulating twisted electrons in strong-field ionization, Faraday Discuss. 228, 394 (2021)

    2021

  25. [33]

    Skruszewicz, J

    S. Skruszewicz, J. Tiggesb¨ aumker, K.-H. Meiwes-Broer, M. Arbeiter, T. Fennel, and D. Bauer, Two-color strong- field photoelectron spectroscopy and the phase of the phase, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 043001 (2015)

    2015

  26. [34]

    M. A. Almajid, M. Zabel, S. Skruszewicz, J. Tiggesb¨ aumker, and D. Bauer, Two-color phase-of- the-phase spectroscopy in the multiphoton regime, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.50, 194001 (2017)

    2017

  27. [35]

    W¨ urzler, S

    D. W¨ urzler, S. Skruszewicz, A. M. Sayler, D. Zille, M. M¨ oller, P. Wustelt, Y. Zhang, J. Tiggesb¨ aumker, and G. G. Paulus, Accurate retrieval of ionization times by means of the phase-of-the-phase spectroscopy, and its limits, Phys. Rev. A101, 033416 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    V. A. Tulsky, M. A. Almajid, and D. Bauer, Two-color phase-of-the-phase spectroscopy with circularly polar- ized laser pulses, Phys. Rev. A98, 053433 (2018)

    2018

  29. [37]

    V. A. Tulsky, B. Krebs, J. Tiggesb¨ aumker, and D. Bauer, Revealing laser-coherent electron features us- ing phase-of-the-phase spectroscopy, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.53, 074001 (2020)

    2020

  30. [38]

    A. S. Landsman and U. Keller, Tunnelling time in strong field ionisation, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.47, 204024 (2014)

    2014

  31. [39]

    Zhang, X

    L. Zhang, X. Xie, S. Roither, Y. Zhou, P. Lu, D. Kartashov, M. Sch¨ offler, D. Shafir, P. B. Corkum, A. Baltuˇ ska, A. Staudte, and M. Kitzler, Subcycle con- trol of electron-electron correlation in double ionization, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 193002 (2014)

    2014

  32. [40]

    Richter, M

    M. Richter, M. Kunitski, M. Sch¨ offler, T. Jahnke, L. P. Schmidt, M. Li, Y. Liu, and R. D¨ orner, Streaking tem- poral double slit interference by an orthogonal two-color laser field, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.635, 143001 (2015)

    2015

  33. [41]

    T. Das, B. B. Augstein, and C. Figueira de Moris- son Faria, High-order-harmonic generation from di- atomic molecules in driving fields with nonvanishing ellipticity: A generalized interference condition, Phys. Rev. A88, 023404 (2013)

    2013

  34. [42]

    T. Das, B. B. Augstein, C. Figueira de Morisson Faria, L. E. Chipperfield, D. J. Hoffmann, and J. P. Marangos, Extracting an electron’s angle of return from shifted in- terference patterns in macroscopic high-order-harmonic spectra of diatomic molecules, Phys. Rev. A92, 023406 (2015)

    2015

  35. [43]

    Y. Li, Y. Zhou, M. He, M. Li, and P. Lu, Identifying backward-rescattering photoelectron hologram with or- thogonal two-color laser fields, Opt. Express24, 23697 (2016)

    2016

  36. [44]

    M. Han, P. Ge, Y. Shao, M.-M. Liu, Y. Deng, C. Wu, Q. Gong, and Y. Liu, Revealing the sub-barrier phase using a spatiotemporal interferometer with orthogonal two-color laser fields of comparable intensity, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 073201 (2017)

    2017

  37. [45]

    X. Gong, C. Lin, F. He, Q. Song, K. Lin, Q. Ji, W. Zhang, J. Ma, P. Lu, Y. Liu, H. Zeng, W. Yang, and J. Wu, Energy-resolved ultrashort delays of photo- electron emission clocked by orthogonal two-color laser fields, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 143203 (2017)

    2017

  38. [46]

    X. Xie, T. Wang, S. Yu, X. Lai, S. Roither, D. Kar- tashov, A. Baltuˇ ska, X. Liu, A. Staudte, and M. Kit- zler, Disentangling intracycle interferences in photo- electron momentum distributions using orthogonal two- color laser fields, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 243201 (2017)

    2017

  39. [47]

    Habibovi´ c, W

    D. Habibovi´ c, W. Becker, and D. B. Miloˇ sevi´ c, Sym- metries and selection rules of the spectra of photo- electrons and high-order harmonics generated by field- driven atoms and molecules, Symmetry14, 1566 (2021)

    2021

  40. [48]

    D. B. Miloˇ sevi´ c, W. Becker, and R. Kopold, Genera- tion of circularly polarized high-order harmonics by two- color coplanar field mixing, Phys. Rev. A61, 063403 (2000)

    2000

  41. [49]

    D. B. Miloˇ sevi´ c and W. Becker, Improved strong-field approximation and quantum-orbit theory: Application to ionization by a bicircular laser field, Phys. Rev. A 93, 063418 (2016)

    2016

  42. [50]

    C. A. Mancuso, D. D. Hickstein, K. M. Dorney, J. L. Ellis, E. Hasovi´ c, R. Knut, P. Grychtol, C. Gentry, M. Gopalakrishnan, D. Zusin, F. J. Dollar, X.-M. Tong, D. B. Miloˇ sevi´ c, W. Becker, H. C. Kapteyn, and M. M. Murnane, Controlling electron-ion rescattering in two- colo...

    2016

  43. [51]

    Hoang, V.-H

    V.-H. Hoang, V.-H. Le, C. D. Lin, and A.-T. Le, Retrieval of target structure information from laser- induced photoelectrons by few-cycle bicircular laser fields, Phys. Rev. A95, 031402 (2017)

    2017

  44. [52]

    Eckart, M

    S. Eckart, M. Kunitski, I. Ivanov, M. Richter, K. Fehre, A. Hartung, J. Rist, K. Henrichs, D. Trabert, N. Schlott, L. P. H. Schmidt, T. Jahnke, M. S. Sch¨ offler, A. Kheifets, and R. D¨ orner, Subcycle interference upon tunnel ionization by counter-rotating two-color fields, P...

    2018

  45. [53]

    D. B. Miloˇ sevi´ c and W. Becker, Channel-closing effects in strong-field ionization by a bicircular field, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.51, 054001 (2018)

    2018

  46. [54]

    S. Yue, S. Brennecke, H. Du, and M. Lein, Probing dy- namical symmetries by bicircular high-order harmonic spectroscopy beyond the Born-Oppenheimer approxi- mation, Phys. Rev. A101, 053438 (2020)

    2020

  47. [55]

    Rozen, A

    S. Rozen, A. Comby, E. Bloch, S. Beauvarlet, D. Descamps, B. Fabre, S. Petit, V. Blanchet, B. Pons, N. Dudovich, and Y. Mairesse, Controlling subcycle op- tical chirality in the photoionization of chiral molecules, Phys. Rev. X9, 031004 (2019)

    2019

  48. [56]

    Pisanty, G

    E. Pisanty, G. J. Machado, V. Vicu˜ na-Hern´ andez, A. Pic´ on, A. Celi, J. P. Torres, and M. Lewenstein, Knotting fractional-order knots with the polarization state of light, Nature Photonics13, 569 (2019)

    2019

  49. [57]

    L. E. Chipperfield, J. S. Robinson, J. W. G. Tisch, and J. P. Marangos, Ideal waveform to generate the maxi- mum possible electron recollision energy for any given oscillation period, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 063003 (2009)

    2009

  50. [58]

    P. B. Corkum, Plasma perspective on strong field mul- tiphoton ionization, Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 1994 (1993)

    1993

  51. [59]

    Becker, S

    W. Becker, S. P. Goreslavski, D. B. Miloˇ sevi´ c, and G. G. Paulus, The plateau in above-threshold ionization: the keystone of rescattering physics, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.51, 162002 (2018)

    2018

  52. [60]

    Becker, F

    W. Becker, F. Grasbon, R. Kopold, D. B. Miloˇ sevi´ c, G. G. Paulus, and H. Walther, Above-threshold ioniza- tion: From classical features to quantum effects, Adv. At. Mol. Opt. Phys.48, 35 (2002)

    2002

  53. [61]

    D. B. Miloˇ sevi´ c, G. G. Paulus, D. Bauer, and W. Becker, 24 Above-threshold ionization by few-cycle pulses, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.39, R203 (2006)

    2006

  54. [62]

    Lewenstein, P

    M. Lewenstein, P. Balcou, M. Y. Ivanov, A. L’Huillier, and P. B. Corkum, Theory of high-harmonic generation by low-frequency laser fields, Phys. Rev. A49, 2117 (1994)

    1994

  55. [63]

    Figueira de Morisson Faria and X

    C. Figueira de Morisson Faria and X. Liu, Elec- tron–electron correlation in strong laser fields, J. Mod. Opt.58, 1076 (2011)

    2011

  56. [64]

    Becker, X

    W. Becker, X. Liu, P. J. Ho, and J. H. Eberly, Theo- ries of photoelectron correlation in laser-driven multiple atomic ionization, Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 1011 (2012)

    2012

  57. [65]

    F. A. Cotton, Chemical Applications of Group Theory (Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, New Jersey, U.S., 1990)

    1990

  58. [66]

    Weyl, Symmetry (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, U.S., 1952)

    H. Weyl, Symmetry (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, U.S., 1952)

    1952

  59. [67]

    Polak and R

    M. Polak and R. Trivers, The science of symmetry in biology, Trends in Ecology and Evolution9, 122 (1994)

    1994

  60. [68]

    O. E. Alon, V. Averbukh, and N. Moiseyev, Selection rules for the high harmonic generation spectra, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 3743 (1998)

    1998

  61. [69]

    D. B. Miloˇ sevi´ c, Circularly polarized high harmonics generated by a bicircular field from inert atomic gases in thepstate: A tool for exploring chirality-sensitive processes, Phys. Rev. A92, 043827 (2015)

    2015

  62. [70]

    X. Liu, X. Zhu, L. Li, Y. Li, Q. Zhang, P. Lan, and P. Lu, Selection rules of high-order-harmonic genera- tion: Symmetries of molecules and laser fields, Phys. Rev. A94, 033410 (2016)

    2016

  63. [71]

    Neufeld, D

    O. Neufeld, D. Podolsky, and O. Cohen, Floquet group theory and its application to selection rules in harmonic generation, Nat. Commun.10, 405 (2019)

    2019

  64. [72]

    Busuladˇ zi´ c, A

    M. Busuladˇ zi´ c, A. Gazibegovi´ c-Busuladˇ zi´ c, and D. B. Miloˇ sevi´ c, Strong-field ionization of homonuclear di- atomic molecules by a bicircular laser field: Rotational and reflection symmetries, Phys. Rev. A95, 033411 (2017)

    2017

  65. [73]

    Habibovi´ c, A

    D. Habibovi´ c, A. Gazibegovi´ c-Busuladˇ zi´ c, M. Busu- ladˇ zi´ c, A.ˇCerki´ c, and D. B. Miloˇ sevi´ c, Strong-field ion- ization of homonuclear diatomic molecules using orthog- onally polarized two-color laser fields, Phys. Rev. A102, 023111 (2020)

    2020

  66. [74]

    T. Rook, L. C. Rodriguez, and C. Figueira de Moris- son Faria, Influence of catastrophes and hidden dynam- ical symmetries on ultrafast backscattered photoelec- trons, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 023329 (2024)

    2024

  67. [75]

    Neufeld, M

    O. Neufeld, M. E. Tzur, O. Kfir, A. Fleischer, and O. Cohen, Light’s symmetry, asymmetry, and their role in nonlinear optics and ultrafast phenomena (2025), arXiv:2503.19433 [physics.optics]

    2025 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Rook and C

    T. Rook and C. Figueira de Morisson Faria, Exploring symmetries in photoelectron holography with two-color linearly polarized fields, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 55, 165601 (2022)

    2022

  69. [77]

    Liu and C

    X. Liu and C. Figueira de Morisson Faria, Nonsequential double ionization with few-cycle laser pulses, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 133006 (2004)

    2004

  70. [78]

    Bergues, M

    B. Bergues, M. K¨ ubel, N. G. Johnson, B. Fischer, N. Ca- mus, K. J. Betsch, O. Herrwerth, A. Senftleben, a. M. Sayler, T. Rathje, T. Pfeifer, I. Ben-Itzhak, R. R. Jones, G. G. Paulus, F. Krausz, R. Moshammer, J. Ullrich, and M. F. Kling, Attosecond tracing of correlated elect...

    2012

  71. [79]

    Huang, W

    C. Huang, W. Guo, Y. Zhou, and Z. Wu, Role of Coulomb repulsion in correlated-electron emission from a doubly excited state in nonsequential double ioniza- tion of molecules, Phys. Rev. A93, 013416 (2016)

    2016

  72. [80]

    K¨ ubel, C

    M. K¨ ubel, C. Burger, N. G. Kling, T. Pischke, L. Beau- fore, I. Ben-Itzhak, G. G. Paulus, J. Ullrich, T. Pfeifer, R. Moshammer, M. F. Kling, and B. Bergues, Complete characterization of single-cycle double ionization of ar- gon from the nonsequential to the sequential ioniza...

    2016

  73. [81]

    A. Chen, M. K¨ ubel, B. Bergues, M. F. Kling, and A. Emmanouilidou, Non-sequential double ionization with near-single cycle laser pulses, Sci. Rep.7, 7488 (2017)

    2017

  74. [82]

    L. B. Fu, G. G. Xin, D. F. Ye, and J. Liu, Recollision dynamics and phase diagram for nonsequential double ionization with circularly polarized laser fields, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 103601 (2012)

    2012

  75. [83]

    Huang, M

    C. Huang, M. Zhong, and Z. Wu, Anomalous ellipticity dependence in nonsequential double ionization of arxe, Sci. Rep.8, 10.1038/s41598-018-27120-x (2018)

    2018 doi

  76. [84]

    W. Quan, Z. Lin, M. Wu, H. Kang, H. Liu, X. Liu, J. Chen, J. Liu, X. T. He, S. G. Chen, H. Xiong, L. Guo, H. Xu, Y. Fu, Y. Cheng, and Z. Z. Xu, Classical aspects in above-threshold ionization with a midinfrared strong laser field, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 093001 (2009)

    2009

  77. [85]

    Q. Song, H. Li, J. Wang, P. Lu, X. Gong, Q. Ji, K. Lin, W. Zhang, J. Ma, H. Li, H. Zeng, F. He, and J. Wu, Double ionization of nitrogen molecules in orthogonal two-color femtosecond laser fields, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.51, 074002 (2018)

    2018

  78. [86]

    H. Pang, X. Huang, and C. Huang, Sub-cycle dynam- ics of nonsequential double ionization of Ar atom by few-cycle counter-rotating two-color circularly polarized laser fields, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B34, 2050304 (2020)

    2020

  79. [87]

    Z. Ge, L. Bai, X. Su, and K. Liu, Nonsequential dou- ble ionization channels control of CO 2 molecules with counter-rotating two-color circularly polarized laser field by laser wavelength, Open Physics21, 10.1515/phys- 2023-0114 (2023)

    2023 doi

  80. [88]

    Z. Liu, C. Huang, T. He, J. Liao, Y. Li, and B. Yu, The Coulomb effect in nonsequential double ionization by counter-rotating two-color elliptical polarization fields, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.26, 4572 (2024)

    2024

  81. [89]

    M. Lein, E. K. U. Gross, and V. Engel, Intense-field double ionization of helium: Identifying the mechanism, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 4707 (2000)

    2000

  82. [90]

    J. S. Parker, B. J. S. Doherty, K. T. Taylor, K. D. Schultz, C. I. Blaga, and L. F. DiMauro, High-energy cutoff in the spectrum of strong-field nonsequential dou- ble ionization, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 133001 (2006)

    2006

  83. [91]

    Baier, C

    S. Baier, C. Ruiz, L. Plaja, and A. Becker, Nonsequen- tial double ionization of the hydrogen molecule in a few- cycle laser pulse, Phys. Rev. A74, 033405 (2006)

    2006

  84. [92]

    Baier, C

    S. Baier, C. Ruiz, L. Plaja, and A. Becker, Single and double ionization of the hydrogen molecule in an intense few-cycle laser pulse, Laser Phys.17, 358 (2007)

    2007

  85. [93]

    Figueira de Morisson Faria, H

    C. Figueira de Morisson Faria, H. Schomerus, X. Liu, and W. Becker, Electron-electron dynamics in laser- induced nonsequential double ionization, Phys. Rev. A 69, 043405 (2004)

    2004

  86. [94]

    Figueira de Morisson Faria, X

    C. Figueira de Morisson Faria, X. Liu, A. Sanpera, and M. Lewenstein, Classical and quantum-mechanical treatments of nonsequential double ionization with few- 25 cycle laser pulses, Phys. Rev. A70, 043406 (2004)

    2004

  87. [95]

    Figueira de Morisson Faria and M

    C. Figueira de Morisson Faria and M. Lewenstein, Bound-state corrections in laser-induced nonsequential double ionization, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.38, 3251 (2005)

    2005

  88. [96]

    Figueira de Morisson Faria, T

    C. Figueira de Morisson Faria, T. Shaaran, X. Liu, and W. Yang, Quantum interference in laser-induced nonse- quential double ionization in diatomic molecules: Role of alignment and orbital symmetry, Phys. Rev. A78, 043407 (2008)

    2008

  89. [97]

    Z. Chen, Y. Liang, and C. D. Lin, Quantitative rescat- tering theory of correlated two-electron momentum spectra for strong-field nonsequential double ionization of helium, Phys. Rev. A82, 063417 (2010)

    2010

  90. [98]

    Z. Chen, Y. Wang, T. Morishita, X. Hao, J. Chen, O. Zatsarinny, and K. Bartschat, Revisiting the recolli- sional excitation-tunneling process in strong-field nonse- quential double ionization of helium, Phys. Rev. A100, 023405 (2019)

    2019

  91. [99]

    Z. Chen, A. Zhou, T. Morishita, Y. Bai, X. Hao, O. Zat- sarinny, and K. Bartschat, Anticorrelation in nonse- quential double ionization of helium, Phys. Rev. A103, 053102 (2021)

    2021

  92. [100]

    Z. Chen, S. Li, H. Kang, T. Morishita, and K. Bartschat, Ellipticity dependence of anticorrelation in the nonse- quential double ionization of Ar, Opt. Express30, 44039 (2022)

    2022

  93. [101]

    Figueira de Morisson Faria, T

    C. Figueira de Morisson Faria, T. Shaaran, and M. T. Nygren, Time-delayed nonsequential double ionization with few-cycle laser pulses: Importance of the carrier- envelope phase, Phys. Rev. A86, 053405 (2012)

    2012

  94. [102]

    Shaaran, C

    T. Shaaran, C. Figueira de Morisson Faria, and H. Schomerus, Causality and quantum interference in time-delayed laser-induced nonsequential double ioniza- tion, Phys. Rev. A85, 023423 (2012)

    2012

  95. [103]

    Hashim, R

    S. Hashim, R. Tenney, and C. Figueira de Moris- son Faria, Detangling the quantum tapestry of intra- channel interference in below-threshold nonsequential double ionization with few-cycle laser pulses, Phys. Rev. A109, 063110 (2024)

    2024

  96. [104]

    X. Hao, J. Chen, W. Li, B. Wang, X. Wang, and W. Becker, Quantum effects in double ionization of ar- gon below the threshold intensity, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 073002 (2014)

    2014

  97. [105]

    A. S. Maxwell and C. Figueira de Morisson Faria, Quan- tum interference in time-delayed nonsequential double ionization, Phys. Rev. A92, 023421 (2015)

    2015

  98. [106]

    A. S. Maxwell and C. Figueira de Morisson Faria, Con- trolling below-threshold nonsequential double ionization via quantum interference, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 143001 (2016)

    2016

  99. [107]

    Hashim, D

    S. Hashim, D. Habibovi´ c, and C. Figueira de Moris- son Faria, Below threshold nonsequential double ioniza- tion with linearly polarized two-color fields II: Quantum interference, Phys. Rev. A, in press (arXiv:2504.04971)

    arXiv

  100. [108]

    Shaaran, M

    T. Shaaran, M. T. Nygren, and C. Figueira de Moris- son Faria, Laser-induced nonsequential double ioniza- tion at and above the recollision-excitation-tunneling threshold, Phys. Rev. A81, 063413 (2010)

    2010

  101. [109]

    G. S. J. Armstrong, M. A. Khokhlova, M. Labeye, A. S. Maxwell, E. Pisanty, and M. Ruberti, Dialogue on ana- lytical and ab initio methods in attoscience, Eur. Phys. J. D75, 209 (2021)

    2021

  102. [110]

    T.-M. Yan, S. V. Popruzhenko, M. J. J. Vrakking, and D. Bauer, Low-energy structures in strong field ioniza- tion revealed by quantum orbits, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 253002 (2010)

    2010

  103. [111]

    X. Y. Lai, C. Poli, H. Schomerus, and C. Figueira de Morisson Faria, Influence of the Coulomb potential on above-threshold ionization: A quantum-orbit analysis beyond the strong-field approximation, Phys. Rev. A 92, 043407 (2015)

    2015

  104. [112]

    A. S. Maxwell, A. Al-Jawahiry, T. Das, and C. Figueira de Morisson Faria, Coulomb-corrected quantum interference in above-threshold ionization: Working towards multi-trajectory electron holography, Phys. Rev. A96, 023420 (2017)

    2017

  105. [113]

    A. S. Maxwell and C. Figueira de Morisson Faria, Coulomb-free and Coulomb-distorted recolliding quan- tum orbits in photoelectron holography, J. Phys. B At. Mol. Phys.51, 124001 (2018)

    2018

  106. [114]

    A. C. Bray, A. S. Maxwell, Y. Kissin, M. Ruberti, M. F. Ciappina, V. Averbukh, and C. Figueira de Moris- son Faria, Polarization in strong-field ionization of ex- cited helium, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.54, 194002 (2021)

    2021

  107. [115]

    Shaaran and C

    T. Shaaran and C. F. de Morisson Faria, Laser-induced nonsequential double ionization: kinematic constraints for the recollision-excitation-tunneling mechanism, J. Mod. Opt.57, 984 (2010)

    2010

  108. [116]

    Figueira de Morisson Faria and B

    C. Figueira de Morisson Faria and B. B. Augstein, Molecular high-order harmonic generation with more than one active orbital: Quantum interference effects, Phys. Rev. A81, 043409 (2010)

    2010

  109. [117]

    Shaaran, B

    T. Shaaran, B. B. Augstein, and C. Figueira de Moris- son Faria, Excitation two-center interference and the orbital geometry in laser-induced nonsequential dou- ble ionization of diatomic molecules, Phys. Rev. A84, 013429 (2011)

    2011

  110. [118]

    D. B. Miloˇ sevi´ c, A. S. Jaˇ sarevi´ c, D. Habibovi´ c, E. Hasovi´ c, A. ˇCerki´ c, and W. Becker, Asymptotic methods applied to integrals occurring in strong-laser- field processes, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.57, 393001 (2024)

    2024

  111. [119]

    Habibovi´ c, W

    D. Habibovi´ c, W. Becker, and D. B. Miloˇ sevi´ c, Com- plete classification and additional saddle-point solutions for high-order above-threshold ionization induced by a strong laser field. ii. classical considerations, Phys. Rev. A111, 053110 (2025)

    2025

  112. [120]

    C. F. de Morisson Faria and W. Becker, Quantum-orbit analysis of nonsequential double ionization, Laser Phys. 13, 1196 (2003)

    2003

  113. [121]

    Figueira de Morisson Faria, M

    C. Figueira de Morisson Faria, M. D¨ orr, W. Becker, and W. Sandner, Time-frequency analysis of two-color high- harmonic generation, Phys. Rev. A60, 1377 (1999)

    1999

  114. [122]

    S. V. Popruzhenko, Keldysh theory of strong field ion- ization: history, applications, difficulties and perspec- tives, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.47, 204001 (2014)

    2014

  115. [123]

    Figueira de Morisson Faria, H

    C. Figueira de Morisson Faria, H. Schomerus, and W. Becker, High-order above-threshold ionization: The uniform approximation and the effect of the binding po- tential, Phys. Rev. A66, 043413 (2002)

    2002

  116. [124]

    Bauer, D

    D. Bauer, D. B. Miloˇ sevi´ c, and W. Becker, Strong-field approximation for intense-laser–atom processes: The choice of gauge, Phys. Rev. A72, 023415 (2005)

    2005

  117. [125]

    M. Y. Ivanov, M. Spanner, and O. Smirnova, Anatomy of strong field ionization, J. Mod. Opt.52, 165 (2005)

    2005

  118. [126]

    Smirnova, M

    O. Smirnova, M. Spanner, and M. Ivanov, Anatomy of 26 strong field ionization ii: to dress or not to dress?, Jour- nal of Modern Optics54, 1019 (2007)

    2007

  119. [127]

    Torlina, J

    L. Torlina, J. Kaushal, and O. Smirnova, Time-resolving electron-core dynamics during strong-field ionization in circularly polarized fields, Phys. Rev. A88, 053403 (2013)

    2013

  120. [128]

    A. S. Maxwell, S. V. Popruzhenko, and C. Figueira de Morisson Faria, Treating branch cuts in quantum tra- jectory models for photoelectron holography, Phys. Rev. A98, 063423 (2018)

    2018

  121. [129]

    Cruz Rodriguez, T

    L. Cruz Rodriguez, T. Rook, B. B. Augstein, A. S. Maxwell, and C. Figueira de Morisson Faria, For- ward and hybrid path-integral methods in photoelectron holography: Sub-barrier corrections, initial sampling, and momentum mapping, Phys. Rev. A108, 033114 (2023)

    2023

  122. [130]

    T. Rook, D. Habibovi´ c, L. C. Rodriguez, D. B. Miloˇ sevi´ c, and C. Figueira de Morisson Faria, Impact of the continuum coulomb interaction in quantum-orbit- based treatments of high-order above-threshold ioniza- tion, Phys. Rev. A109, 033115 (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.