Spin hydrodynamics

Wojciech Florkowski

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 49 references

Spin hydrodynamics

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proposes a hybrid form of spin hydrodynamics that connects kinetic-theory and entropy-current approaches and resolves the stability and causality problems found in earlier formulations.

desk verdict A clear, honest proceedings-style summary of the author's own hybrid spin hydrodynamics, with no new results and a real but unaddressed pseudogauge issue. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.19673 v1 pith:UU2HOS7U submitted 2024-11-29 hep-ph

Wojciech Florkowski This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-ph

keywords spinhydrodynamicsheavy-ioncollisionspolarizationtensorthermalvorticitylocalequilibriumangularmomentumconservationentropycurrentrelativisticfluiddynamics

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that existing approaches to spin hydrodynamics, which have been developed independently from kinetic theory and from macroscopic entropy-current considerations, can be combined into a single hybrid framework. The author's starting point is a specific definition of local equilibrium: a fluid of particles with spin is in local equilibrium when the spin part of the total angular momentum is conserved on its own, a regime physically dominated by s-wave scattering. That premise supports tensor-shaped thermodynamic relations with a tensor spin chemical potential, and it motivates a two-fold expansion, one in the spin polarization tensor and one in spacetime gradients. If the proposal is right, the competing formulations can be understood as special limits of one scheme, and the stability and causality problems reported for earlier spin-hydrodynamic equations disappear. The paper is a concise research statement rather than a new numerical calculation, so its central claim is a synthesis proposal to be tested in applications.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the set of generalized tensor thermodynamic relations, Eqs. (2)--(4), together with the spin polarization tensor $\omega_{\alpha\beta}=\Omega_{\alpha\beta}/T$. These relations convert the conservation law for the spin part of angular momentum into a thermodynamic framework in which $\omega_{\alpha\beta}$ plays the role of $\xi=\mu/T$: a dimensionless, independent thermodynamic variable. The entropy-production formula (6) then ties the nonequilibrium corrections $\delta N^\mu$, $\delta T^{\mu\lambda}$, and $\delta S^{\mu,\alpha\beta}$ to gradients of the standard variables and of $\omega$, defining the dissipative sector. The two-fold expansion in $\omega$ and gradients is what lets the framework connect kinetic-theory results with entropy-current treatments without assuming that $\omega$ itself is a gradient term.

What would settle it

In a transport model with explicit spin-dependent cross sections, compute the divergence $\partial_\mu S^{\mu,\alpha\beta}$ from the microscopic collision terms; if the spin part of angular momentum is not conserved on hydrodynamic time scales because higher-partial-wave or spin-exchange scattering is significant, the assumed local-equilibrium premise fails and the hybrid framework's thermodynamic base must be replaced.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that perfect and dissipative spin hydrodynamics can be built from one hybrid framework whose local-equilibrium reference is conservation of the spin part of total angular momentum, $\partial_\mu S^{\mu,\alpha\beta}=0$. This conservation law makes it natural to introduce the tensor spin chemical potential $\Omega_{\mu\nu}$ and the spin polarization tensor $\omega_{\alpha\beta}=\Omega_{\alpha\beta}/T$, and to write the entropy current using the generalized tensor thermodynamic relations (2)--(4). The author argues that such relations are necessary because the equilibrium spin tensor is not of the simple form $u^\mu S^{\alpha\beta}$; when it is expanded in $\omega$, all other thermodynamic tensors must be kept one order higher. Dissipation is added by replacing equilibrium currents with nonequilibrium currents and expanding in gradients, so the complete scheme is a two-fold expansion in $\omega_{\alpha\beta}$ and gradients. The payoff, as the paper states, is an explicit connection between approaches and a resolution of the stability and causality problems that appear when the spin tensor and $\omega$ are assigned incompatible orders.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that local equilibrium for particles with spin can be identified with conservation of the spin part of the total angular momentum, a regime justified only by s-wave scattering dominance; if spin-changing or higher-partial-wave interactions are not negligible, that conservation law fails and the thermodynamic relations built on it lose their foundation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A single set of conservation laws, Eqs. (1), including the spin part of angular momentum, defines the perfect-fluid sector for spin hydrodynamics.
The generalized thermodynamic relations (2)--(4) keep nontrivial spin contributions at second order in $\omega$ without the contradictory assumption that the spin tensor and the spin polarization tensor are of different orders.
The entropy-production formula (6) provides a route to derive dissipative currents and transport coefficients from gradients of the standard variables and of $\omega$.
Global equilibrium is characterized by the generalized global-equilibrium conditions, including $\omega_{\lambda\mu}=\partial_{[\mu}\beta_{\lambda]}$, while local equilibrium keeps $\omega$ and thermal vorticity decoupled.
Stability and causality problems found in earlier formulations are traced to the assumption $S_{\alpha\beta}=S(T,\mu)\omega_{\alpha\beta}$; the kinetic-theory dependence on electriclike and magneticlike components removes them.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Beyond the paper: treating $\omega$ as an independent thermodynamic variable rather than a gradient effect changes what one would predict for spin polarization in boost-invariant expansions, where the standard gradient combination vanishes but $\omega$ need not.
Beyond the paper: the s-wave-dominance criterion gives a quantitative threshold; measuring or computing spin-changing and higher-partial-wave cross sections in the relevant temperature range would show whether the assumed local equilibrium is ever realized.
Beyond the paper: the two-fold expansion suggests a program of building a spin equation of state, analogous to tables for the baryon chemical potential, that could be tabulated from microscopic models and used directly in simulations.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Bottom line: this is a clear, honest proceedings-style summary of the author's own program, not a new research contribution. If you need a compact statement of the hybrid spin hydrodynamics approach and its motivation, it's fine. Don't go looking for new equations or resolution of stability/causality debates; they are referenced, not derived.

The paper does a few things well. It lays out the four families of spin hydrodynamics and explains why the author's tensor thermodynamic relations avoid the S = u S assumption that leads to instabilities. The two-fold expansion in spin polarization and gradients is a sensible organizing principle, and the manuscript is explicit that the hybrid synthesis already appeared in Phys. Rev. D 110, 096018. The writing is upfront about what is asserted vs. shown.

The main soft spot is the one the stress-test flags: treating ∂_μ S^{μ,αβ}=0 as a physical conservation law that defines local equilibrium. As the author's own cited works on pseudogauge transformations show, the spin tensor is not unique; the Belinfante construction eliminates it entirely. So 'spin conservation' is a convention-dependent condition, and the generalized thermodynamics built on it inherit that convention. The paper cites [22,26] but does not address why the choice matters or how predictions change under pseudogauge. That is a genuine gap, though for a proceedings piece that is summarizing previous work, it may be too much to demand a full resolution. Still, a paragraph acknowledging the ambiguity and pointing to where it is settled would have strengthened the contribution.

Also, the references are heavily self-citational, but that is not surprising for a summary of one's own program, and the cited works do exist and are relevant. The novelty score is low by design; the paper declares itself a reexamination.

Who is this for? Newcomers to spin hydrodynamics who want a quick orientation from one of the field's active groups, or someone looking for a citation to the hybrid framework. It does not deserve a full independent research review; it is a review article, and a short one. I'd suggest accepting it as a conference proceedings contribution without demanding major changes, but I would not send it to a referee to check new claims, because there are none.

Recommendation: fine for proceedings, desk-accept as a summary, not a research paper.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a short position/summary paper that re-examines spin hydrodynamics and advocates a specific 'hybrid' formulation developed in the author's earlier works [42,43]. It defines local equilibrium through the conservation of the spin part of angular momentum (Eq. (1)), introduces generalized tensor thermodynamic relations (Eqs. (2)-(4)), presents an entropy-production formula (Eq. (6)), and claims that the approach resolves stability/causality issues and unifies kinetic-theory-based and Israel-Stewart-based frameworks. The paper is organized around a two-fold expansion in the spin polarization tensor and in gradients of hydrodynamic variables.

Significance. If the hybrid scheme is correct, it would provide a unified, order-consistent framework for perfect and dissipative spin hydrodynamics, with potential consequences for spin-polarization phenomenology in heavy-ion collisions. The explicit emphasis on a two-fold expansion and on different electriclike/magneticlike susceptibilities is a useful contribution to a field where different groups use inconsistent starting points. However, the key equations and stability claims are not derived or analyzed in the present manuscript; they are quoted from previous publications. The physical foundation in Eq. (1) also leaves the pseudogauge ambiguity of the spin tensor unaddressed. Consequently, the paper's significance rests largely on the referenced literature and on a forthcoming assessment of whether the approach is truly gauge-invariant.

major comments (3)

[Section 2, Eq. (1)] The premise that ∂_μ S^{μ,αβ}=0 defines local equilibrium must confront the pseudogauge ambiguity of the spin tensor. Since S^{μ,αβ} is not unique—pseudogauge transformations redistribute angular momentum between spin and orbital parts while preserving total J—the conservation law is not an invariant physical condition. The paper cites Refs. [22,26] on pseudogauge transformations but does not specify the pseudogauge in which Eq. (1) is intended to hold, nor does it demonstrate that the generalized thermodynamic relations (2)-(4) and any physical predictions are independent of that choice. Without such a specification, the tensor spin chemical potential Ωαβ and the resulting local-equilibrium construction may be convention-dependent. A concrete test would be to exhibit the theory in the Belinfante pseudogauge, where S^{μ,αβ} can be set to zero and Eq. (1) becomes trivial, and to show what happens to the spin chemical potential and to the entropy-production formula in that case.
[Section 3, Eq. (6)] The entropy-production formula is load-bearing for the dissipative extension and for the global-equilibrium conditions derived from it, but the manuscript simply states 'the calculation ... gives' Eq. (6) and does not show the derivation from Eq. (5) and from ∂_μ S^{μ,αβ}=T^{βα}-T^{αβ}. This matters because the paper explicitly claims to extend previous analyses by using a different reference point for local equilibrium quantities. The derivation should either be included explicitly or the equivalence with existing results (e.g., Eq. (10) of Ref. [24] and Eq. (21) of Ref. [30]) should be demonstrated term by term for the new reference point.
[Section 4, item (ii)] The claim that 'the problems with stability and causality ... can be solved by the reference to the kinetic-theory result [32]' is not demonstrated in this paper. If resolving stability is one of the advertised achievements of the hybrid approach, the manuscript should at least state the stability condition on the spin equation of state (for instance, the different dependence of the electriclike and magneticlike components) and sketch how it follows from the generalized thermodynamic relations (2)-(4). As written, the claim is purely bibliographic and cannot be checked by the reader.

minor comments (5)

[Introduction] There is a typo 'exmaple' in the sentence citing Ref. [40]; it should be 'example'.
[References] Reference [44] lists an author as 'N. /suppress Lygan'; this appears to be a corrupted name and should be corrected.
[Section 2] The text first says that expansions can be made 'in ξ and/or ωαβ', but later states that 'the only expansion parameter discussed so far has been the magnitude of the spin polarization tensor components ωμν'. This is at least verbally inconsistent and should be reconciled, for example by clarifying that ξ is not expanded at the perfect-fluid level.
[Section 3, Eq. (5)] The term N^μ appearing in Eq. (5) is not defined physically in the text; given that N^μ also appears in Eqs. (2)-(4), a sentence explaining its role (and why it is distinct from the particle current N^μ) would help the non-specialist reader.
[Abstract] The abstract is extremely brief and gives no indication that the paper is a summary of a program developed in earlier publications; a sentence stating the scope and the hybrid proposal would make the contribution more informative.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is a transparent review/proposal that derives its entropy-production identity in-text and cites peer-reviewed prior work for the generalized thermodynamic relations.

full rationale

The paper does not present a fitted parameter as a prediction or define a quantity in terms of the target result. The central construction is a sequence of explicit thermodynamic identities: Eq. (2) is the entropy-current ansatz, Eq. (3) its variation, Eq. (4) the Legendre-type complement; the conservation laws (1) are stated assumptions, not outputs. Eq. (6) is obtained by direct differentiation of Eq. (5) using ∂_μ S^{μ,αβ}=T^{βα}-T^{αβ}, which is itself derived from total angular-momentum conservation. The 'hybrid approach' in Sec. 4 is explicitly attributed to Refs. [42,43]; this is self-citation, but those works are published and the paper makes no claim to derive them anew. The s-wave justification for spin conservation is an external-physics assumption, not a circular definition. There is no equation-level reduction, no fitted input called a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem imported from the authors. The skeptical concern about pseudogauge dependence is a physical correctness risk, not a circularity. Hence score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper postulates a local-equilibrium regime defined by spin conservation and a two-fold expansion in ω and gradients. These are programmatic assumptions, not derived within the manuscript. No free parameters are fitted, and no new entities are introduced beyond the existing tensor spin chemical potential from prior literature.

assumptions (5)

ad hoc to paper Local equilibrium for particles with spin corresponds to conservation of the spin part of the total angular momentum, justified by s-wave scattering dominance.
Introduced in Section 2 as the author's suggested definition; it is the foundation for using a tensor spin chemical potential and the conservation law ∂_μ S^{μ,αβ}=0 in Eq. (1).
domain assumption The spin chemical potential Ω^{μν} can be introduced as an antisymmetric tensor Lagrange multiplier.
Section 2; a standard constrained-thermodynamics construction, but its applicability to spin local equilibrium is a modeling assumption.
domain assumption The equilibrium spin tensor starts with terms linear in the spin polarization tensor ω, so nontrivial spin contributions to thermodynamic relations begin at quadratic order.
Section 2 states 'all calculations suggest that the expansion of S^{μ,αβ}_eq starts with terms linear in the coefficients of ω^{αβ}'. This order-counting assumption underlies the two-fold expansion scheme.
standard math The entropy current Eq. (2), the nonequilibrium replacement Eq. (5), and the entropy production Eq. (6) are valid.
Standard entropy-current analysis following Israel and Stewart; Eq. (6) is noted as already derived in Refs. [24,25,30,47].
standard math Total angular momentum conservation implies ∂_μ S^{μ,αβ} = T^{βα} - T^{αβ}.
Standard field-theoretic identity for canonical energy-momentum and spin tensors, invoked in Section 3.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spin hydrodynamics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UU2HOS7U

@misc{pith2026241119673,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spin hydrodynamics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UU2HOS7U}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.19673}
}

read the original abstract

The concept of spin hydrodynamics is reexamined and briefly characterized.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

[24]

Hattori, M

K. Hattori, M. Hongo, X.-G. Huang, M. Matsuo, H. Taya, Fate o f spin polarization in a relativistic ﬂuid: An entropy-current analysis, Phys . Lett. B 795 (2019) 100–106. doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2019.05.040. arXiv:1901.06615

arXiv 2019
[30]

Biswas, A

R. Biswas, A. Daher, A. Das, W. Florkowski, R. Ryblewski, Rela- tivistic second-order spin hydrodynamics: An entropy-current a nalysis, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 014024. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.014024. arXiv:2304.01009

arXiv 2023
[32]

Daher, W

A. Daher, W. Florkowski, R. Ryblewski, Stability constraint for spin equation of state, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 034029. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.034029. arXiv:2401.07608

arXiv 2024
[1]

Adamczyk, et al

L. Adamczyk, et al. (STAR), Global Λ hyperon polarization in nucle ar collisions: evidence for the most vortical ﬂuid, Nature 548 (2017) 6 2–65. doi:10.1038/nature23004. arXiv:1701.06657

arXiv 2017
[2]

J. Adam, L. Adamczyk, J. Adams, J. K. Adkins, G. Agakishiev, M. Ag- garwal, Z. Ahammed, N. Ajitanand, I. Alekseev, D. Anderson, et a l., Global polarization of λ hyperons in au+ au collisions at s nn= 200 gev, Physical Review C 98 (2018) 014910. 6

work page 2018
[3]

Niida (STAR), Global and local polarization of Λ hyperons in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV from STAR, Nucl

T. Niida (STAR), Global and local polarization of Λ hyperons in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV from STAR, Nucl. Phys. A 982 (2019) 511–514. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2018.08.034. arXiv:1808.10482

arXiv 2019
[4]

Florkowski, M

W. Florkowski, M. P. Heller, M. Spali´ nski, New theories of relativis tic hydrodynamics in the lhc era, Reports on Progress in Physics 81 (20 18) 046001

work page
[5]

Romatschke, U

P. Romatschke, U. Romatschke, Relativistic ﬂuid dynamics in and out of equilibrium—ten years of progress in theory and numerical simulation s of nuclear collisions, arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.05815 (2017)

arXiv 2017

Show all 49 references

[6]

Becattini, V

F. Becattini, V. Chandra, L. Del Zanna, E. Grossi, Rel- ativistic distribution function for particles with spin at local thermodynamical equilibrium, Annals Phys. 338 (2013) 32–49. doi:10.1016/j.aop.2013.07.004. arXiv:1303.3431

2013 arXiv
[7]

Becattini, M

F. Becattini, M. Buzzegoli, G. Inghirami, I. Karpenko, A. Palermo , Local Polarization and Isothermal Local Equilibrium in Relativis- tic Heavy Ion Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 272302. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.272302. arXiv:2103.14621

2021 arXiv
[8]

Palermo, E

A. Palermo, E. Grossi, I. Karpenko, F. Becattini, Λ polarization in very high energy heavy ion collisions as a probe of the quark–gluon plasma formation and properties, Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (2024) 920. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13229-z . arXiv:2404.14295

2024 arXiv
[9]

Florkowski, B

W. Florkowski, B. Friman, A. Jaiswal, E. Speranza, Relativis- tic ﬂuid dynamics with spin, Phys. Rev. C97 (2018) 041901. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.97.041901. arXiv:1705.00587

2018 arXiv
[10]

Florkowski, B

W. Florkowski, B. Friman, A. Jaiswal, R. Ryblewski, E. Sper- anza, Spin-dependent distribution functions for relativistic hydro - dynamics of spin-1/2 particles, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 116017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.116017. arXiv:1712.07676

2018 arXiv
[11]

Florkowski, A

W. Florkowski, A. Kumar, R. Ryblewski, Thermodynamic versus kinetic approach to polarization-vorticity coupling, Phys. Rev. C 98 (2018 ) 044906. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.98.044906. arXiv:1806.02616. 7

2018 arXiv
[12]

Florkowski, A

W. Florkowski, A. Kumar, R. Ryblewski, Relativistic hydrodynamic s for spin-polarized ﬂuids, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 108 (2019) 1037 09. doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2019.07.001. arXiv:1811.04409

2019 arXiv
[13]

Bhadury, W

S. Bhadury, W. Florkowski, A. Jaiswal, A. Kumar, R. Ry- blewski, Relativistic dissipative spin dynamics in the relax- ation time approximation, Phys. Lett. B 814 (2021) 136096. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136096. arXiv:2002.03937

2021
[14]

Bhadury, W

S. Bhadury, W. Florkowski, A. Jaiswal, A. Kumar, R. Ryblewski, R el- ativistic Spin Magnetohydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 (2022 ) 192301. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.192301. arXiv:2204.01357

2022 arXiv
[15]

Weickgenannt, X.-L

N. Weickgenannt, X.-L. Sheng, E. Speranza, Q. Wang, D. H. Rischke, Kinetic theory for massive spin-1/2 particles from the Wigner-function formalism, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 056018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.056018. arXiv:1902.06513

2019 arXiv
[16]

Weickgenannt, E

N. Weickgenannt, E. Speranza, X.-l. Sheng, Q. Wang, D. H. Risc hke, Derivation of the nonlocal collision term in the relativistic Boltzmann equation for massive spin-1/2 particles from quantum ﬁeld theory, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 016022. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.016022. arXiv...

2021 arXiv
[17]

Weickgenannt, E

N. Weickgenannt, E. Speranza, X.-l. Sheng, Q. Wang, D. H. Rischke, Generating Spin Polarization from Vorticity through Nonlocal Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 052301. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.052301. arXiv:2005.01506

2021 arXiv
[18]

Weickgenannt, D

N. Weickgenannt, D. Wagner, E. Speranza, D. H. Rischke, Rel- ativistic second-order dissipative spin hydrodynamics from the method of moments, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 096014. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.096014. arXiv:2203.04766

2022 arXiv
[19]

Weickgenannt, J.-P

N. Weickgenannt, J.-P. Blaizot, Chiral hydrodynamics of expanding systems, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 056012. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.056012. arXiv:2311.15817

2024 arXiv
[20]

Wagner, M

D. Wagner, M. Shokri, D. H. Rischke, Damping of spin waves, Phy s. Rev. Res. 6 (2024) 043103. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.043103. arXiv:2405.00533. 8

2024 arXiv
[21]

Hu, Relativistic ﬁrst-order spin hydrodynamics via the Chapman-Enskog expansion, Phys

J. Hu, Relativistic ﬁrst-order spin hydrodynamics via the Chapman-Enskog expansion, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 076009. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.076009. arXiv:2111.03571

2022 arXiv
[22]

S. Li, M. A. Stephanov, H.-U. Yee, Nondissipative Second-Orde r Trans- port, Spin, and Pseudogauge Transformations in Hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 082302. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.082302. arXiv:2011.12318

2021 arXiv
[23]

S. Shi, C. Gale, S. Jeon, From chiral kinetic theory to relativis- tic viscous spin hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. C 103 (2021) 044906. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.103.044906. arXiv:2008.08618

2021 arXiv
[25]

Fukushima, S

K. Fukushima, S. Pu, Spin hydrodynamics and symmetric energy - momentum tensors – A current induced by the spin vorticity –, Phys . Lett. B 817 (2021) 136346. doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136346. arXiv:2010.01608

2021
[26]

Daher, A

A. Daher, A. Das, W. Florkowski, R. Ryblewski, Canon- ical and phenomenological formulations of spin hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. C 108 (2023) 024902. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.108.024902. arXiv:2202.12609

2023 arXiv
[27]

Daher, A

A. Daher, A. Das, R. Ryblewski, Stability studies of ﬁrst-order spin-hydrodynamic frameworks, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 054043 . doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.054043. arXiv:2209.10460

2023 arXiv
[28]

Sarwar, M

G. Sarwar, M. Hasanujjaman, J. R. Bhatt, H. Mishra, J.-e. Alam, Causality and stability of relativistic spin hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 054031. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.054031. arXiv:2209.08652

2023 arXiv
[29]

D.-L. Wang, S. Fang, S. Pu, Analytic solutions of relativistic dissip ative spin hydrodynamics with Bjorken expansion, Phys. Rev. D 104 (202 1) 114043. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.114043. arXiv:2107.11726. 9

arXiv
[31]

Xie, D.-L

X.-Q. Xie, D.-L. Wang, C. Yang, S. Pu, Causality and stability analy sis for the minimal causal spin hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023 ) 094031. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.094031. arXiv:2306.13880

2023 arXiv
[33]

X. Ren, C. Yang, D.-L. Wang, S. Pu, Thermodynamic stability in re l- ativistic viscous and spin hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 034010. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.034010. arXiv:2405.03105

2024 arXiv
[34]

Daher, W

A. Daher, W. Florkowski, R. Ryblewski, F. Taghinavaz, Stability and causality of rest frame modes in second-order spin hydrodyna mics, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 114001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.114001. arXiv:2403.04711

2024 arXiv
[35]

A. D. Gallegos, U. G¨ ursoy, A. Yarom, Hydrodynamics of spin currents, SciPost Phys. 11 (2021) 041. doi: 10.21468/SciPostPhys.11.2.041. arXiv:2101.04759

2021 arXiv
[36]

Hongo, X.-G

M. Hongo, X.-G. Huang, M. Kaminski, M. Stephanov, H.-U. Yee, R ela- tivistic spin hydrodynamics with torsion and linear response theory f or spin relaxation, JHEP 11 (2021) 150. doi: 10.1007/JHEP11(2021)150. arXiv:2107.14231

2021 arXiv
[37]

Kumar, D.-L

A. Kumar, D.-L. Yang, P. Gubler, Spin alignment of vector meson s by second-order hydrodynamic gradients, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 054038. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.054038. arXiv:2312.16900

2024 arXiv
[38]

D. She, A. Huang, D. Hou, J. Liao, Relativistic viscous hydrody- namics with angular momentum, Sci. Bull. 67 (2022) 2265–2268. doi:10.1016/j.scib.2022.10.020. arXiv:2105.04060

2022 arXiv
[39]

Montenegro, L

D. Montenegro, L. Tinti, G. Torrieri, Ideal relativistic ﬂuid limit for a medium with polarization, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 056012. 10 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.056012. arXiv:1701.08263, [Addendum: Phys.Rev.D 96, 079901 (2017)]

2017 arXiv
[40]

Huang, An introduction to relativistic spin hydrodynamics (2024)

X.-G. Huang, An introduction to relativistic spin hydrodynamics (2024). arXiv:2411.11753

2024 arXiv
[41]

Coleman, Lectures of Sidney Coleman on Quantum Field Theory , WSP, Hackensack, 2018

S. Coleman, Lectures of Sidney Coleman on Quantum Field Theory , WSP, Hackensack, 2018. doi:10.1142/9371

2018 doi
[42]

Florkowski, M

W. Florkowski, M. Hontarenko, Generalized thermodynamic rela tions for perfect spin hydrodynamics (2024). arXiv:2405.03263

2024 arXiv
[43]

Drogosz, W

Z. Drogosz, W. Florkowski, M. Hontarenko, Hybrid approach t o perfect and dissipative spin hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 09601 8. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.096018. arXiv:2408.03106

2024 arXiv
[44]

Drogosz, W

Z. Drogosz, W. Florkowski, N. /suppress Lygan, R. Ryblewski, Boost- invariant spin hydrodynamics with spin feedback eﬀects (2024). arXiv:2411.06154

2024
[45]

S. K. Singh, R. Ryblewski, W. Florkowski, Spin dynamics with realist ic hydrodynamic background for relativistic heavy-ion collisions (2024 ). arXiv:2411.08223

2024 arXiv
[46]

Israel, J

W. Israel, J. M. Stewart, Transient relativistic thermodynam- ics and kinetic theory, Annals Phys. 118 (1979) 341–372. doi:10.1016/0003-4916(79)90130-1

1979 doi
[47]

Becattini, A

F. Becattini, A. Daher, X.-L. Sheng, Entropy current and ent ropy pro- duction in relativistic spin hydrodynamics, Phys. Lett. B 850 (2024) 138533. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138533. arXiv:2309.05789

2024
[48]

R. C. Tolman, Relativity, Thermodynamics and Cosmology, Oxford Uni- versity Press, London, 1934

1934
[49]

Klein, On the thermodynamical equilibrium of ﬂuids in gravitation al ﬁelds, Rev

O. Klein, On the thermodynamical equilibrium of ﬂuids in gravitation al ﬁelds, Rev. Mod. Phys. 21 (1949) 531. 11

1949

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [24]

Hattori, M

K. Hattori, M. Hongo, X.-G. Huang, M. Matsuo, H. Taya, Fate o f spin polarization in a relativistic ﬂuid: An entropy-current analysis, Phys . Lett. B 795 (2019) 100–106. doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2019.05.040. arXiv:1901.06615

arXiv 2019

[2] [30]

Biswas, A

R. Biswas, A. Daher, A. Das, W. Florkowski, R. Ryblewski, Rela- tivistic second-order spin hydrodynamics: An entropy-current a nalysis, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 014024. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.014024. arXiv:2304.01009

arXiv 2023

[3] [32]

Daher, W

A. Daher, W. Florkowski, R. Ryblewski, Stability constraint for spin equation of state, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 034029. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.034029. arXiv:2401.07608

arXiv 2024

[4] [1]

Adamczyk, et al

L. Adamczyk, et al. (STAR), Global Λ hyperon polarization in nucle ar collisions: evidence for the most vortical ﬂuid, Nature 548 (2017) 6 2–65. doi:10.1038/nature23004. arXiv:1701.06657

arXiv 2017

[5] [2]

J. Adam, L. Adamczyk, J. Adams, J. K. Adkins, G. Agakishiev, M. Ag- garwal, Z. Ahammed, N. Ajitanand, I. Alekseev, D. Anderson, et a l., Global polarization of λ hyperons in au+ au collisions at s nn= 200 gev, Physical Review C 98 (2018) 014910. 6

work page 2018

[6] [3]

Niida (STAR), Global and local polarization of Λ hyperons in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV from STAR, Nucl

T. Niida (STAR), Global and local polarization of Λ hyperons in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV from STAR, Nucl. Phys. A 982 (2019) 511–514. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2018.08.034. arXiv:1808.10482

arXiv 2019

[7] [4]

Florkowski, M

W. Florkowski, M. P. Heller, M. Spali´ nski, New theories of relativis tic hydrodynamics in the lhc era, Reports on Progress in Physics 81 (20 18) 046001

work page

[8] [5]

Romatschke, U

P. Romatschke, U. Romatschke, Relativistic ﬂuid dynamics in and out of equilibrium—ten years of progress in theory and numerical simulation s of nuclear collisions, arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.05815 (2017)

arXiv 2017