Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Scaling New Frontiers: Insights into Large Recommendation Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.00714 v1 pith:SXLQVYXJ submitted 2024-12-01 cs.IR

Scaling New Frontiers: Insights into Large Recommendation Models

classification cs.IR
keywords recommendationlargemodelsscalinglawsparametersperformancesystems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Recommendation systems are essential for filtering data and retrieving relevant information across various applications. Recent advancements have seen these systems incorporate increasingly large embedding tables, scaling up to tens of terabytes for industrial use. However, the expansion of network parameters in traditional recommendation models has plateaued at tens of millions, limiting further benefits from increased embedding parameters. Inspired by the success of large language models (LLMs), a new approach has emerged that scales network parameters using innovative structures, enabling continued performance improvements. A significant development in this area is Meta's generative recommendation model HSTU, which illustrates the scaling laws of recommendation systems by expanding parameters to thousands of billions. This new paradigm has achieved substantial performance gains in online experiments. In this paper, we aim to enhance the understanding of scaling laws by conducting comprehensive evaluations of large recommendation models. Firstly, we investigate the scaling laws across different backbone architectures of the large recommendation models. Secondly, we conduct comprehensive ablation studies to explore the origins of these scaling laws. We then further assess the performance of HSTU, as the representative of large recommendation models, on complex user behavior modeling tasks to evaluate its applicability. Notably, we also analyze its effectiveness in ranking tasks for the first time. Finally, we offer insights into future directions for large recommendation models. Supplementary materials for our research are available on GitHub at https://github.com/USTC-StarTeam/Large-Recommendation-Models.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Pitfall of Scaling Up: Uncovering and Mitigating Popularity Bias Amplification in Scaling Transformer-based Recommenders

    cs.IR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Transformer recommenders amplify popularity bias via spectral collapse when scaled; SPRINT constrains attention column-sums and feed-forward spectral norms to improve fairness and scaling behavior.

  2. Expand More, Shrink Less: Shaping Effective-Rank Dynamics for Dense Scaling in Recommendation

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    RankElastor mitigates embedding collapse via spectrum-robust token mixing and GLU-based P-FFNs, yielding better performance and scaling on industrial recommendation datasets.

  3. From Scaling to Structured Expressivity: Rethinking Transformers for CTR Prediction

    cs.IR 2025-11 reject novelty 6.0

    FAT specializes attention by semantic field and reports +0.51% AUC over baselines on Taobao data, but its power-law scaling law is an empirical fit, not a derived prediction.

  4. Faster and Memory-Efficient Training of Sequential Recommendation Models for Large Catalogs

    cs.IR 2025-08 accept novelty 6.0

    CCE- is a Triton kernel implementation of cross-entropy loss with negative sampling that reduces memory by more than 10x and accelerates training by up to 2x for large-catalog sequential recommenders.

  5. Why Thinking Hurts: Diagnosing and Rectifying Linguistic Inertia in Large Language Models for Recommendation

    cs.IR 2026-02 conditional novelty 5.0

    Chain-of-thought reasoning degrades semantic-ID recommendation accuracy through 'linguistic inertia,' and a training-free compression-plus-contrastive decoding fix restores and often improves accuracy.