Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Long-distance cascaded fluorescence of cold Cesium atoms coupled to an optical nanofiber

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Resonance fluorescence from one cold-cesium ensemble, reflected after a 32-meter fiber delay, drives a second independent ensemble and comes out broadened and blue-shifted; this is the longest one-way cascaded atom-photon link reported to…

desk verdict A credible long-distance cascaded fluorescence experiment whose non-Markovian conclusion outruns the model. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.01099 v2 pith:T5OYT4YA submitted 2024-12-02 quant-ph

Mohammad Sadeghi , Wayne Crump , Scott Parkins , Maarten Hoogerland This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords cascadedquantumsystemsresonancefluorescenceopticalnanofibercoldcesiumatomsnon-MarkoviandynamicsMollowtripletBeer-Lambertabsorptionnetworks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports the first experimental demonstration of cascaded resonance fluorescence between two ensembles of laser-cooled cesium atoms coupled to an optical nanofiber and separated by a 64-meter round-trip photon delay. Photons spontaneously emitted by a strongly driven first ensemble travel through standard fiber, reflect from a fiber Bragg grating mirror, and unidirectionally drive a second, ground-state ensemble. The measured cascaded spectrum is broader and slightly blue-shifted relative to the original fluorescence, and the ratio of cascaded to original photon flux falls as the drive power rises. A simple model that sends the Mollow-triplet spectrum of the first ensemble through a Beer-Lambert Lorentzian absorption filter reproduces the broadening, the spectra, and the flux ratio. The authors read this as evidence that a finite-bandwidth drive produces non-Markovian memory effects over distances far exceeding the cesium excited-state lifetime, establishing the longest-distance one-way cascaded atom-photon interface to date.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is a two-node unidirectional cascaded system connected by a 64-meter fiber link: a first ensemble of cold 133Cs atoms strongly driven near the F=4 → F'=5 transition, a 99%-reflective fiber Bragg grating mirror about 32 m away, and a second independent ground-state ensemble. The spectral model combines the Mollow triplet formula for the first ensemble's fluorescence (Eq. 2, with elastic and inelastic terms at offsets ω relative to the laser frequency) with the Beer-Lambert law (Eq. 4) using a Lorentzian absorption profile of fitted width and depth; the cascaded photon count is the integral of the Mollow spectrum weighted by this filter over offsets −10Γ to +10Γ. This frequency-domain filter is what converts a finite-bandwidth drive into the observed broadening and shift, and it is also the step that carries the paper's claim about non-Markovian memory.

What would settle it

Time-resolve the second ensemble's response: send the first ensemble's fluorescence through the fiber and measure the transmitted field's second-order correlation g^(2)(τ) or the re-emission decay after the drive is shut off. A genuine non-Markovian memory should show non-exponential or oscillatory behavior on the correlation timescale of the fluorescence (tens of nanoseconds), whereas the Beer-Lambert filter predicts only exponential attenuation governed by the fitted optical depth.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Under strong driving, the first ensemble emits a Mollow triplet: a central elastic peak and two inelastic sidebands separated by roughly the Rabi frequency. After a 310 ns propagation delay (64 m round trip, more than ten times the 30.4 ns cesium lifetime), this finite-bandwidth field reaches the second ensemble, which has already returned to its ground state, so the interaction is a unidirectional cascaded drive rather than coherent feedback. The second ensemble acts as a frequency-dependent absorber, so the transmitted cascaded spectrum is the original Mollow spectrum filtered by a Lorentzian Beer-Lambert absorption line. The fit gives an absorption width of (6.7±0.6) MHz and an optical depth of (0.85±0.04), and the cascaded spectrum is on average about 5 MHz broader and 0.5–1.5 MHz blue-shifted relative to the original fluorescence. The authors interpret the blue shift as a consequence of power-dependent heating and van der Waals redistribution of atoms during the delay, and the comparable widths of the emission and absorption lines as confirmation that a finite-bandwidth, correlated drive produces non-Markovian memory effects at separations far beyond the atomic lifetime.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes the second ensemble behaves as a fixed linear Lorentzian absorber with a fitted width and depth, so the cascaded spectrum is just the first ensemble's Mollow spectrum multiplied by this frequency-domain filter; if the second ensemble's response depends on the time-correlations of the drive rather than only its frequency content, the model could match the data without actually capturing the claimed memory effect.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A one-way cascaded atom-photon interface works over a 64-meter standard-fiber link without requiring coherence between the two ensembles, so quantum-network nodes could be connected by fluorescence rather than by coherent transfer.
  • The cascaded spectrum's broadening and blue shift are quantitatively captured by cascaded absorption, which means any fiber-based protocol using resonance fluorescence as a carrier must account for this spectral reshaping.
  • Because the cascaded-to-original flux ratio depends on drive power, the coupling between distant ensembles can be tuned or switched by changing the intensity of the first ensemble's drive.
  • The comparable emission and absorption linewidths (6.45±1.17 MHz vs 6.7±0.6 MHz) support the paper's conclusion that finite-bandwidth, correlated light can carry memory effects over delays much longer than the atomic lifetime.
  • The demonstrated geometry is a direct experimental step toward multi-ensemble fiber networks and toward studying the crossover to coherent time-delayed feedback as the fiber length is shortened.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the stationary Lorentzian filter truly reproduces all observed spectra, then the 'non-Markovian' claim is not yet distinguished from a purely frequency-domain picture; a time-domain measurement of the second ensemble's response would settle which description is physical.
  • The blue shift attributed to heating and van der Waals redistribution could be tested by varying the delay between the original and cascaded photon detection windows: a motion-based shift should grow with the time the atoms spend in the probe field, while a pure filter shift would be independent of delay.
  • Shortening the fiber toward the cesium lifetime, as the outlook suggests, should reveal a transition from unidirectional cascading to coherent feedback; a concrete prediction is that the cascaded spectrum will develop coherent resonances or modified sideband structure as the delay approaches the atomic coherence time.
  • The same geometry, with the FBG mirror replaced by a variable reflector, could be used to continuously tune the cascaded coupling strength and check whether the fitted optical depth scales linearly with atomic density, giving a direct test of the Beer-Lambert treatment.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports a nanofiber-based cascaded-fluorescence experiment in which fluorescence from a strongly driven ensemble of cold cesium atoms is guided through a 64 m optical-fiber round trip (about 310 ns delay), reflected by a fiber Bragg grating, and then interacts with a second, ground-state atomic ensemble before detection. The authors measure the original and delayed ('cascaded') fluorescence as functions of excitation power and detuning, and model the cascaded spectra by taking the driven-atom Mollow spectrum, normalizing it with the measured original fluorescence, and attenuating it with a Beer-Lambert Lorentzian absorption profile. They report a broadened and blue-shifted cascaded spectrum and interpret the agreement with this model as evidence of non-Markovian dynamics arising from the finite bandwidth of the cascaded field.

Significance. If the experimental results are taken at face value, this is a noteworthy demonstration of a long-distance unidirectional atom-photon cascade using an optical nanofiber: the 64 m delay is substantially longer than the atomic lifetime, and the delayed second peak and its power-dependent attenuation are credible observations. The paper is careful in its time-tagging procedure, in identifying the delayed peak, and in measuring saturation and linewidth trends. However, the advertised 'insight into non-Markovian dynamics' is not supported by the analysis presented: the model is a stationary frequency-domain filter, and the key parameters are fitted to the same data that the model is said to reproduce. The paper would be significantly strengthened by either toning down the non-Markovian interpretation or adding a genuinely predictive or time-domain test.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3, Eqs. (2)–(4); §4, Conclusion] The central interpretive claim—that the finite-bandwidth drive 'gives rise to non-Markovian memory effects'—is not established by the reported analysis. The cascaded spectrum is computed in Sec. 3 as the stationary Mollow spectrum of Eq. (2) multiplied by the Beer-Lambert Lorentzian absorption factor of Eq. (4) and integrated over frequency. This is a steady-state, single-frequency linear-response filter: it contains no memory kernel, no dependence on the drive correlation time, and no two-time correlation, and a Lorentzian spectral line shape is the Markovian limit of a two-level absorber. Agreement of this filter with the time-averaged spectra (Figs. 3–4) therefore cannot confirm or test non-Markovian dynamics. The conclusion in Sec. 4 should be softened, or direct evidence such as two-time photon correlations, a non-Markovianity measure, or a time-domain cascaded-model calculation should be provided.
  2. [§3, Fig. 3 and Fig. 4(a,c)] The claim that the model 'well reproduces' the ratio of cascaded to original photon flux is not an independent validation. The cascaded flux is obtained by normalizing the Mollow spectrum with the measured original fluorescence and filtering it through a Lorentzian absorption profile whose width (6.7 MHz), optical depth (0.85), and frequency shift are all fitted to the same data. The ratio is therefore, by construction, a flexible two-to-three-parameter fit. To make the model predictive, the absorption width and depth should be fixed by independent measurements, or the authors should provide an out-of-sample test and a sensitivity analysis with respect to parameter degeneracies.
  3. [§3, Fig. 4(b,d); §5, Fig. 5(b)] The blue shift of the cascaded spectrum—one of the paper's headline features—is introduced as a free frequency-shift parameter in the cascade model and then attributed, post hoc, to second-ensemble redistributions and heating during the 310 ns delay. No independent measurement of the second-ensemble resonance is provided, so the data cannot distinguish an intrinsic cascaded-absorption blue shift from a time-dependent technical shift of the atom cloud. An independent characterization of the absorbing ensemble at the relevant delay, or control experiments with different delays or powers, is needed before this shift can be used as evidence for the proposed mechanism.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and §1] The abstract and introduction describe 'two spatially and temporally independent ensembles,' but the experimental configuration appears to use a single MOT cloud, with the reflected field acting on the same atoms after they have returned to the ground state. Please clarify whether the two ensembles are spatially distinct and, if not, rephrase as temporally separated interactions with the same ensemble.
  2. [Eq. (2)] Equation (2) is typeset in a way that is difficult to parse; in particular, the bracketing in the denominator should be checked and cleaned so that the reader can verify the Mollow expression.
  3. [§3, Fig. 4] The Lorentzian fits to the original fluorescence should state which parameters are fixed (linewidth, center, background) and how the fits handle the asymmetric tails visible at high power.
  4. [§4, Conclusion] The phrase 'confirming that a finite-bandwidth drive gives rise to non-Markovian memory effects' exceeds what the Beer-Lambert model can show; this should be revised in line with major comment 1.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

Cascaded spectrum and ratio are reproduced with a Lorentzian filter whose width, depth, and shift are fitted to the same data; the non-Markovian conclusion rests on this fitted filter.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. 3 'Experimental Results', Figs. 3 and 4 model; Eqs. (2) and (4)]
    "To obtain the fitted curve for the cascaded fluorescence in Fig. 3 (red curve), we first take the Mollow spectrum at each excitation intensity ... we integrate the Mollow spectrum, weighted by the Beer–Lambert Lorentzian filter, over a scattered-photon frequency offset ω (from −10Γ to +10Γ) to obtain the simulated cascaded photon count (red curve in Fig. 3). Using the width and depth of the cascaded absorption spectrum as parameters, we obtain a best fit with a width of (6.7±0.6) MHz and an optical depth of (0.85±0.04)."

    The cascaded-to-original photon-flux ratio highlighted in the abstract is constructed by taking the measured original photon count, normalizing the Mollow spectrum by it, and then integrating that spectrum against the Beer–Lambert Lorentzian filter of Eq. (4). The width and depth of that filter are fit to the same cascaded data they are then used to reproduce, so the model's 'reproduction' of the ratio and of the cascaded spectrum is a two-parameter fit rather than an independent prediction. The detuning-scan result is also fit: 'The fitted curves in Fig. 4(b,d) are from the ratio of the fitted curves in Fig. 4(a,c).' The reported broadening and ratio behavior are therefore largely forced by the fitted filter parameters, not derived from an independent first-principles calculation.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Sec. 4 'Conclusion and Outlook']
    "The extracted cascaded absorption linewidth of the second ensemble (6.7±0.6) MHz is comparable to the original emission linewidth of the first ensemble (6.45±1.17) MHz, confirming that a finite-bandwidth drive gives rise to non-Markovian memory effects over distances far exceeding the excited-state lifetime."

    This 'confirmation' compares two fitted outputs of the paper's own models: 6.7 MHz is the fitted Beer–Lambert Lorentzian absorption width and 6.45 MHz is the fitted Γ parameter from the power-broadening relation of Eq. (5). Neither number is an independent measurement of non-Markovianity. Moreover, the model used to extract the cascaded width is a stationary Lorentzian (Markovian linear-response) filter, so agreement between these fitted constants cannot by itself establish non-Markovian memory; the finite-bandwidth/non-Markovian interpretation is imposed on a fitted filter rather than being validated by a two-time correlation or a non-Markovianity measure.

full rationale

The experimental core is independent and credible: the paper measures a delayed (310 ns) cascaded fluorescence peak, attenuation, power broadening, and detuning spectra, and these observations do not reduce to the model. However, the model-level claims in the abstract and conclusion are weaker. The cascaded spectrum and the ratio of cascaded to original flux are computed using Eq. (2), measured original counts, and the Beer–Lambert Lorentzian filter of Eq. (4); the filter's width, depth, and frequency shift are fitted to the cascaded data. Thus the model's ability to 'reproduce' the ratio and the extra broadening is by construction a fit, not an independent prediction. The final non-Markovian conclusion is likewise based on comparing fitted linewidths from a Markovian filter model, so it is not a stand-alone confirmation of non-Markovian memory. No load-bearing circularity from self-citation was found: the cascaded-system formalism of Carmichael and Gardiner and the non-Markovian review of Breuer et al. are external, independent references. The score of 5 reflects partial circularity: the central fitted-quantity claims reduce to the fit, while the underlying experimental demonstration remains independent.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on several fitted parameters (s0 scale, absorption width, optical depth, frequency shift, and broadening) and on domain assumptions about two-level behavior and linear absorption. The paper introduces no new physical entities.

free parameters (6)
  • Saturation power P_sat = 121 µW
    Defines s0 = I/I0 by setting the half-maximum of the original fluorescence saturation curve to s0 = 1 (Section 3, Fig. 3).
  • Cascaded absorption Lorentzian width = (6.7 ± 0.6) MHz
    Fit parameter for the Beer-Lambert absorption profile used to model cascaded photon counts (Section 3, Fig. 3).
  • Optical depth of second ensemble = (0.85 ± 0.04)
    Second fit parameter for the same Beer-Lambert model; controls the depth of the absorption dip.
  • Frequency shift between cascaded and original spectra = 0.5 to 1.5 MHz (linear slope 0.25 ± 0.06 MHz vs s0)
    Free parameter in the detuning-scan fits of the cascaded spectrum (Section 3, Fig. 5(b)).
  • Natural linewidth Gamma = (6.45 ± 1.17) MHz
    Fitted from the power-broadening relation W(s0) = Gamma sqrt(s0+1) + Gamma0 (Eq. 5); expected to be 5.2 MHz but allowed to float.
  • Additional broadening Gamma0 = (8.44 ± 0.80) MHz
    Fitted from Eq. (5); collects surface-induced and residual dephasing broadening.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Atoms can be treated as an effective two-level system with isotropic emission (50/50 into each fiber direction).
    Section 2: 'This symmetry allows us to treat the atoms as an effective two-level system for linewidth and saturation analysis.' Needed for the Mollow spectrum model and the equal photon split.
  • domain assumption The Mollow triplet formula (Eq. 2) describes the emission spectrum of the strongly driven ensemble.
    Used to compute the original and cascaded spectra; assumes a single two-level atom driven by a coherent field, neglecting multi-level structure and surface-potential variations beyond a fitted broadening.
  • domain assumption The second ensemble absorbs the reflected light as a linear Lorentzian filter (Beer-Lambert law, Eq. 4).
    Central modeling step in Section 3; ignores non-Markovian time-domain correlations and multiple scattering, despite the paper's non-Markovian claim.
  • standard math Standard quantum optics results (Mollow spectrum, saturation behavior) are correct.
    Background theory imported from Refs. [55,57,58].
  • domain assumption The same MOT atoms, after a 310 ns delay, constitute a second independent ensemble in the ground state.
    Justifies the cascaded interpretation as two ensembles rather than coherent time-delayed feedback (Section 1). This is the paper's own distinction, but it is an assumption about atomic state reset and independence.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Long-distance cascaded fluorescence of cold Cesium atoms coupled to an optical nanofiber." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/T5OYT4YA

@misc{pith2026241201099,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Long-distance cascaded fluorescence of cold Cesium atoms coupled to an optical nanofiber},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/T5OYT4YA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.01099}
}
read the original abstract

We demonstrate the first experimental realization of cascaded resonance fluorescence over a 64-meter propagation delay time between two spatially and temporally independent ensembles of laser-cooled Cesium atoms coupled to an optical nanofiber. Spontaneously emitted photons from a strongly driven first ensemble are guided through a standard fiber, reflected by a fiber Bragg grating mirror, and interact with a second ensemble, producing a unidirectional two-node cascaded system. The cascaded fluorescence spectrum is broadened and blue-shifted relative to the original fluorescence spectrum. Our simple model reproduces the power broadening and the cascaded fluorescence spectrum, as well as the ratio of cascaded to original photon flux, giving insight into non-Markovian dynamics. Our results establish the longest-distance one-way cascaded atom-photon interface reported to date, providing a stepping stone towards a fiber-based platform for quantum networking.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.01099 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic of the experimental setup. The FBG mir [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Photon arrival histogram for an excitation laser power [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The photon count rate for the original (blue dots) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) The original fluorescence spectrum linewidth as a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a, c) The photon count rate for original fluorescence [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Correlation Localization in Waveguide QED with Delayed Interactions

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In a waveguide-coupled atomic array under Bragg conditions, finite photon propagation delay causes atom-atom correlations to localize near the initially excited atom with a correlation length scaling as (γτ)^{-1/2}.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    INTRODUCTION Neutral atoms cooled to micro-Kelvin temperatures provide a nearly ideal two-level system because of their coherence times and precise laser control [1, 2]. They have already enabled ground-breaking demonstrations of long-distance entanglement distribution through quan- tum repeaters [3] and fiber-based quantum networking prototypes [4]. A cu...

    arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    cascaded

    EXPERIMENT AL CONFIGURA TION The diagram in Fig. 1 presents a schematic of the ex- perimental setup used in this study. A Magneto-Optical Trap (MOT) [44, 45] creates a cold cloud of approx- imately 5 million atoms at a temperature of around 150µK surrounding the waist of an ONF, which has a diameter of approximately 380 nm. At typical MOT den- sities in o...

    work page 2000

  3. [3]

    EXPERIMENT AL RESUL TS We first examine the saturation behavior of the sys- tem, followed by an analysis of the cascaded spectrum using the model discussed below. Fig. 3 presents the count rates of the original fluorescence and the cascaded fluorescence as a function of the laser intensity for on- resonance excitation. We scale the intensity such that hal...

    work page

  4. [4]

    CONCLUSION AND OUTLOOK We have experimentally demonstrated a two-node, cas- caded interface in which photons emitted by a strongly driven ensemble of cold 133Cs atoms are routed through an optical nanofiber and interact with a second, ground- state ensemble. As the probe intensity increases, it ex- cites a broader range of atoms in the first ensemble, in-...

    work page

  5. [5]

    W. D. Phillips, Nobel lecture: Laser cooling and trapping of neutral atoms, Reviews of Modern Physics70, 721 (1998)

    work page 1998

  6. [6]

    Chu, Nobel lecture: The manipulation of neutral par- ticles, Reviews of Modern Physics70, 685 (1998)

    S. Chu, Nobel lecture: The manipulation of neutral par- ticles, Reviews of Modern Physics70, 685 (1998)

    work page 1998

  7. [7]

    L.-M. Duan, M. D. Lukin, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Long- distance quantum communication with atomic ensembles and linear optics, Nature414, 413 (2001)

    2001

  8. [8]

    H. J. Kimble, The quantum internet, Nature453, 1023 (2008)

    2008

Show all 67 references
  1. [9]

    Vetsch, D

    E. Vetsch, D. Reitz, G. Sagu´ e, R. Schmidt, S. Dawkins, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Optical interface created by laser-cooled atoms trapped in the evanescent field sur- rounding an optical nanofiber, Physical Review Letters 7 104, 203603 (2010)

    2010

  2. [10]

    H. J. Carmichael, Quantum trajectory theory for cas- caded open systems, Physical review letters70, 2273 (1993)

    1993

  3. [11]

    Gardiner, Driving a quantum system with the out- put field from another driven quantum system, Physical review letters70, 2269 (1993)

    C. Gardiner, Driving a quantum system with the out- put field from another driven quantum system, Physical review letters70, 2269 (1993)

    1993

  4. [12]

    Breuer, E.-M

    H.-P. Breuer, E.-M. Laine, J. Piilo, and B. Vacchini, Col- loquium: Non-markovian dynamics in open quantum sys- tems, Reviews of Modern Physics88, 021002 (2016)

    2016

  5. [13]

    L.-M. Duan, J. Cirac, P. Zoller, and E. Polzik, Quantum communication between atomic ensembles using coherent light, Physical Review Letters85, 5643 (2000)

    2000

  6. [14]

    Gardiner and P

    C. Gardiner and P. Zoller,Quantum noise: a handbook of Markovian and non-Markovian quantum stochastic meth- ods with applications to quantum optics(Springer Science & Business Media, 2004)

    2004

  7. [15]

    Kraus, H

    B. Kraus, H. P. B¨ uchler, S. Diehl, A. Kantian, A. Micheli, and P. Zoller, Preparation of entangled states by quan- tum markov processes, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics78, 042307 (2008)

    2008

  8. [16]

    Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Communications in mathematical physics 48, 119 (1976)

    G. Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Communications in mathematical physics 48, 119 (1976)

    1976

  9. [17]

    C. W. Gardiner, A. S. Parkins, and P. Zoller, Wave- function quantum stochastic differential equations and quantum-jump simulation methods, Physical Review A 46, 4363 (1992)

    1992

  10. [18]

    Parkins, P

    A. Parkins, P. Zoller, and H. Carmichael, Spectral linewidth narrowing in a strongly coupled atom-cavity system via squeezed-light excitation of a “vacuum”rabi resonance, Physical Review A48, 758 (1993)

    1993

  11. [19]

    Gardiner and P

    C. Gardiner and P. Zoller,The quantum world of ultra- cold atoms and light book II: the physics of quantum- optical devices, Vol. 4 (World Scientific Publishing Com- pany, 2015)

    2015

  12. [20]

    Ulhaq, S

    A. Ulhaq, S. Weiler, S. M. Ulrich, R. Roßbach, M. Jetter, and P. Michler, Cascaded single-photon emission from the Mollow triplet sidebands of a quantum dot, Nature Photonics6, 238 (2012)

    2012

  13. [21]

    Clark, A

    S. Clark, A. Peng, M. Gu, and S. Parkins, Uncondi- tional preparation of entanglement between atoms in cascaded optical cavities, Physical Review Letters91, 177901 (2003)

    2003

  14. [22]

    Liedl, F

    C. Liedl, F. Tebbenjohanns, C. Bach, S. Pucher, A. Rauschenbeutel, and P. Schneeweiss, Observation of superradiant bursts in a cascaded quantum system, Phys- ical Review X14, 011020 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    Su´ arez-Forero, M

    D. Su´ arez-Forero, M. Jalali Mehrabad, C. Vega, A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, and M. Hafezi, Chiral quantum op- tics: Recent developments and future directions, PRX Quantum6, 020101 (2025)

    2025

  16. [24]

    H. M. Wiseman and G. J. Milburn, Quantum theory of optical feedback via homodyne detection, Physical Re- view Letters70, 548 (1993)

    1993

  17. [25]

    Whalen, A

    S. Whalen, A. Grimsmo, and H. Carmichael, Open quan- tum systems with delayed coherent feedback, Quantum Science and Technology2, 044008 (2017)

    2017

  18. [26]

    N´ emet and S

    N. N´ emet and S. Parkins, Enhanced optical squeezing from a degenerate parametric amplifier via time-delayed coherent feedback, Physical Review A94, 023809 (2016)

    2016

  19. [27]

    N´ emet, S

    N. N´ emet, S. Parkins, A. Knorr, and A. Carmele, Stabi- lizing quantum coherence against pure dephasing in the presence of time-delayed coherent feedback at finite tem- perature, Physical Review A99, 053809 (2019)

    2019

  20. [28]

    Lambropoulos, G

    P. Lambropoulos, G. M. Nikolopoulos, T. R. Nielsen, and S. Bay, Fundamental quantum optics in structured reser- voirs, Reports on Progress in Physics63, 455 (2000)

    2000

  21. [29]

    De Vega and D

    I. De Vega and D. Alonso, Dynamics of non-markovian open quantum systems, Reviews of Modern Physics89, 015001 (2017)

    2017

  22. [30]

    Eschner, C

    J. Eschner, C. Raab, F. Schmidt-Kaler, and R. Blatt, Light interference from single atoms and their mirror im- ages, Nature413, 495 (2001)

    2001

  23. [31]

    Dubin, D

    F. Dubin, D. Rotter, M. Mukherjee, C. Russo, J. Eschner, and R. Blatt, Photon correlation versus interference of single-atom fluorescence in a half-cavity, Physical Review Letters98, 183003 (2007)

    2007

  24. [32]

    A. S. Parkins and C. Gardiner, Effect of finite-bandwidth squeezing on inhibition of atomic-phase decays, Physical Review A37, 3867 (1988)

    1988

  25. [33]

    Nemet, Time-delayed coherent feedback control for open quantum systems, PhD thesis, University of Auck- land (2019)

    N. Nemet, Time-delayed coherent feedback control for open quantum systems, PhD thesis, University of Auck- land (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    D. A. Steck, Cesium d line data (2003), available online athttps://steck.us/alkalidata/cesiumnumbers.pdf

    2003

  27. [35]

    Gouraud, D

    B. Gouraud, D. Maxein, A. Nicolas, O. Morin, and J. Laurat, Demonstration of a memory for tightly guided light in an optical nanofiber, Physical review letters114, 180503 (2015)

    2015

  28. [36]

    Goban,Strong atom-light interactions along nanos- tructures: Transition from free-space to nanophotonic in- terfaces, Ph.D

    A. Goban,Strong atom-light interactions along nanos- tructures: Transition from free-space to nanophotonic in- terfaces, Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology (2015)

    2015

  29. [37]

    K. P. Nayak, M. Sadgrove, R. Yalla, F. Le Kien, and K. Hakuta, Nanofiber quantum photonics, Journal of Op- tics20, 073001 (2018)

    2018

  30. [38]

    S. K. Ruddell, K. E. Webb, I. Herrera, A. S. Parkins, and M. D. Hoogerland, Collective strong coupling of cold atoms to an all-fiber ring cavity, Optica4, 576 (2017)

    2017

  31. [39]

    Lechner, R

    D. Lechner, R. Pennetta, M. Blaha, P. Schneeweiss, A. Rauschenbeutel, and J. Volz, Light-matter interaction at the transition between cavity and waveguide QED, preprint arXiv:2302.07161 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Solano, P

    P. Solano, P. Barberis-Blostein, F. K. Fatemi, L. A. Orozco, and S. L. Rolston, Super-radiance reveals infinite-range dipole interactions through a nanofiber, Nature Communications8, 1857 (2017)

    2017

  33. [41]

    N. V. Corzo, J. Raskop, A. Chandra, A. S. Sheremet, B. Gouraud, and J. Laurat, Waveguide-coupled single collective excitation of atomic arrays, Nature566, 359 (2019)

    2019

  34. [42]

    Solano, J

    P. Solano, J. A. Grover, Y. Xu, P. Barberis-Blostein, J. N. Munday, L. A. Orozco, W. D. Phillips, and S. L. Rolston, Alignment-dependent decay rate of an atomic dipole near an optical nanofiber, Physical Review A99, 013822 (2019)

    2019

  35. [43]

    K. P. Nayak, P. N. Melentiev, M. Morinaga, F. Le Kien, V. I. Balykin, and K. Hakuta, Optical nanofiber as an efficient tool for manipulating and probing atomic fluo- rescence, Optics Express15, 5431 (2007)

    2007

  36. [44]

    M. Das, A. Shirasaki, K. Nayak, M. Morinaga, F. Le Kien, and K. Hakuta, Measurement of fluorescence emission spectrum of few strongly driven atoms using an optical nanofiber, Optics Express18, 17154 (2010)

    2010

  37. [45]

    Sinha, P

    K. Sinha, P. Meystre, E. A. Goldschmidt, F. K. Fatemi, S. L. Rolston, and P. Solano, Non-markovian collective emission from macroscopically separated emitters, Phys- 8 ical Review Letters124, 043603 (2020)

    2020

  38. [46]

    V. S. Ferreira, J. Banker, A. Sipahigil, M. H. Matheny, A. J. Keller, E. Kim, M. Mirhosseini, and O. Painter, Col- lapse and revival of an artificial atom coupled to a struc- tured photonic reservoir, Physical Review X11, 041043 (2021)

    2021

  39. [47]

    H. J. Carmichael,Statistical methods in quantum optics 2: Non-classical fields(Springer Science & Business Me- dia, 2007)

    2007

  40. [48]

    Chu, Laser manipulation of atoms and particles, Sci- ence253, 861 (1991)

    S. Chu, Laser manipulation of atoms and particles, Sci- ence253, 861 (1991)

    1991

  41. [49]

    Ruddell,Calorimetry of an ultracold Bose gas and cav- ity quantum electrodynamics with an optical nanofibre, Ph.D

    S. Ruddell,Calorimetry of an ultracold Bose gas and cav- ity quantum electrodynamics with an optical nanofibre, Ph.D. thesis, University of Auckland (2017)

    2017

  42. [50]

    T. A. Birks and Y. W. Li, The shape of fiber tapers, Journal of lightwave technology10, 432 (1992)

    1992

  43. [51]

    Karapetyan, W

    K. Karapetyan, W. Alt, and D. Meshchede, Optical fibre toolbox for matlab, version 2.1 (2011)

    2011

  44. [52]

    Nagai and T

    R. Nagai and T. Aoki, Ultra-low-loss tapered optical fibers with minimal lengths, Optics express22, 28427 (2014)

    2014

  45. [53]

    Nayak, M

    K. Nayak, M. Das, F. Le Kien, and K. Hakuta, Spec- troscopy of near-surface atoms using an optical nanofiber, Optics Communications285, 4698 (2012)

    2012

  46. [54]

    Passerat de Silans, B

    T. Passerat de Silans, B. Farias, M. Ori´ a, and M. Chevrollier, Laser-induced quantum adsorption of neutral atoms in dielectric surfaces, Applied Physics B 82, 367 (2006)

    2006

  47. [55]

    F. L. Kien, S. Dutta Gupta, and K. Hakuta, Phonon- mediated decay of an atom in a surface-induced poten- tial, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics75, 062904 (2007)

    2007

  48. [56]

    F. L. Kien, S. D. Gupta, and K. Hakuta, Optical exci- tation spectrum of an atom in a surface-induced poten- tial, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics75, 032508 (2007)

    2007

  49. [57]

    Le Kien and K

    F. Le Kien and K. Hakuta, Spontaneous radiative decay of translational levels of an atom near a dielectric sur- face, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Opti- cal Physics75, 013423 (2007)

    2007

  50. [58]

    Patterson, P

    B. Patterson, P. Solano, P. Julienne, L. Orozco, and S. Rolston, Spectral asymmetry of atoms in the van der waals potential of an optical nanofiber, Physical Review A97, 032509 (2018)

    2018

  51. [59]

    H. J. Metcalf and P. Van der Straten,Laser cooling and trapping(Springer Science & Business Media, 1999)

    1999

  52. [60]

    J. R. Ott, M. Wubs, P. Lodahl, N. A. Mortensen, and R. Kaiser, Cooperative fluorescence from a strongly driven dilute cloud of atoms, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics87, 061801 (2013)

    2013

  53. [61]

    B. R. Mollow, Power spectrum of light scattered by two- level systems, Physical Review188(1969)

    1969

  54. [62]

    Ortiz-Guti´ errez, R

    L. Ortiz-Guti´ errez, R. C. Teixeira, A. Eloy, D. F. da Silva, R. Kaiser, R. Bachelard, and M. Fouch´ e, Mollow triplet in cold atoms, New Journal of Physics21, 093019 (2019)

    2019

  55. [63]

    S. K. Ruddell, K. E. Webb, M. Takahata, S. Kato, and T. Aoki, Ultra-low-loss nanofiber fabry–perot cavities op- timized for cavity quantum electrodynamics, Optics let- ters45, 4875 (2020)

    2020

  56. [64]

    R. H. Dicke, Coherence in spontaneous radiation pro- cesses, Physical review93, 99 (1954)

    1954

  57. [65]

    Tebbenjohanns, C

    F. Tebbenjohanns, C. D. Mink, C. Bach, A. Rauschen- beutel, and M. Fleischhauer, Predicting correlations in superradiant emission from a cascaded quantum system, Physical Review A110, 043713 (2024)

    2024

  58. [66]

    N´ emet, D

    N. N´ emet, D. White, S. Kato, S. Parkins, and T. Aoki, Transfer-matrix approach to determining the linear re- sponse of all-fiber networks of cavity-qed systems, Phys- ical Review Applied13, 064010 (2020)

    2020

  59. [67]

    Pichler and P

    H. Pichler and P. Zoller, Photonic circuits with time delays and quantum feedback, Physical Review Letters 116, 093601 (2016)

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.