Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 40 references

MeasureNet: Measurement Based Celiac Disease Identification

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that celiac disease can be graded from duodenal biopsy images by predicting villi and crypt lengths as three-point polylines, and that the proposed MeasureNet system cuts villi-to-crypt ratio error from 0.70 to 0.47…

desk verdict A genuinely useful measurement-first framing for celiac disease grading with a new dataset, but the headline classification numbers are thresholded versions of the same ratio measurements and need independent validation before they carry diagnostic weight. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.01182 v1 pith:TBJPEMDH submitted 2024-12-02 cs.CV

Aayush Kumar Tyagi , Vaibhav Mishra , Ashok Tiwari , Lalita Mehra , Prasenjit Das , Govind Makharia , Prathosh AP , Mausam This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords celiacdiseasevilli-to-cryptratiopolylinedetectionhistopathologyMarshgradingbiopsyimageanalysisdeeplearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

MeasureNet is built on the idea that the lengths of the villi and crypts in a duodenal biopsy—the ratio of which is the clinical marker for celiac disease severity—can be estimated directly by predicting each structure as a three-point polyline, rather than by segmenting pixels or detecting straight lines. The paper introduces this polyline detection framework together with the CeDeM dataset of 750 annotated biopsy images, and reports that the system lowers the mean absolute error of the villi-to-crypt length ratio from about 0.70 to 0.47, raises detection mAP from 40.3 to 50.2, and improves multi-class Marsh grading accuracy from about 70% to 81.4% relative to the closest baseline. A sympathetic reader would care because accurate, less subjective measurement of villi and crypts could make celiac disease grading faster and more reproducible.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is a three-point polyline per villus or crypt, defined by start, middle, and end coordinates; the model is a transformer-based object detector adapted to output six coordinates per instance plus a class label. The argument runs through four interacting mechanisms: a localization loss on point coordinates, a Chamfer-distance loss that matches the predicted polyline to the ground-truth curve, and two object-driven losses that force the total length and the two segment lengths of the predicted polyline to match the ground truth; in addition, a frozen segmentation model supplies a mask of the villi shoulder and crypt border, and its features are mixed with features from a deliberately weaker segmentation model during training so that the detector does not depend too heavily on mask accuracy.

What would settle it

A concrete test: take the 70 test images, have two additional pathologists redraw the villi and crypt polylines, and recompute the grade labels from their measurements; if MeasureNet's predicted grades agree with the original labels much more often than with the new pathologists' labels, the headline accuracy is an artifact of one annotation set rather than a robust measurement of disease severity.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that villi and crypts in H&E-stained duodenal biopsy images can be represented and measured as polylines with a start, middle, and end point, and that a detection model trained to localize these polylines, with losses that directly compare predicted and ground-truth segment lengths, yields clinically usable villi-to-crypt ratios. On the newly collected CeDeM dataset, the system achieves a villi-crypt length-ratio MAE of 0.472, a mAP of 50.29, 82.66% accuracy for binary celiac detection, and 81.42% accuracy for multi-class Marsh grading, improving on segmentation-based, lane-detection, and line-segment-detection baselines. The paper attributes the gains to three ingredients acting together: object-driven length and part-length losses, auxiliary segmentation guidance that locates the villi shoulder and crypt border when crypts are only partially visible, and a mixup over strong and weak segmentation features that prevents over-reliance on the auxiliary mask.

Load-bearing premise

The weakest assumption is that the clinical grade follows deterministically from the villi-to-crypt ratio thresholds (normal, Marsh 1, Marsh 2, Marsh 3) and that the manually drawn polylines used as ground truth are reliable; if either the threshold mapping or the annotations are off, the reported grading accuracy does not reflect real-world diagnosis.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the reported numbers hold, automated grading of celiac disease from duodenal biopsy images becomes feasible at an accuracy close to the manual ratio-based workflow.
  • A three-point polyline appears sufficient to capture villi and crypt curvature, since going to four points gives negligible measurement gain.
  • Auxiliary segmentation of landmark structures such as the villi shoulder and crypt border is beneficial for measurement, and exposing the detector to noisy masks during training makes that benefit robust.
  • The object-driven length losses, not just point localization, are what drive the ratio error down in the ablations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One could replace the discrete Marsh thresholds with a continuous severity score, since the model already outputs a continuous ratio; this might preserve more information for monitoring treatment response.
  • The same polyline-plus-auxiliary-segmentation recipe could transfer to other histopathology measurements that rely on linear structures, such as glandular architecture or tumor dimensions.
  • A direct test of clinical usefulness would be measuring inter-observer agreement when multiple pathologists annotate the same CeDeM images, since the paper's ground-truth grades are tied to one annotation set.
  • If the dataset were expanded across centers and scanners, the robustness benefits of mask mixup would predictably matter more, because segmentation quality varies more across sites.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes MeasureNet, a transformer-based polyline detection framework for measuring villi and crypt lengths in duodenal biopsy images, with the goal of grading celiac disease from the villi-to-crypt length ratio. The method augments a DINO-DETR detector with chamfer-distance, length, and part-length losses, and uses segmentation masks of the villi shoulder and crypt border as auxiliary guidance, with a feature mixup to reduce over-reliance on those masks. The authors introduce CeDeM, a new dataset of 750 H&E-stained duodenum biopsy images with 6,800 polyline annotations, and report measurement, localization, and classification results against segmentation, lane-detection, and line-segment baselines, claiming consistent improvements (e.g., ratio MAE from 0.70 to 0.47, mAP from 40.3 to 50.2, and multi-class grading accuracy from 70% to 81.4%).

Significance. If the reported results are valid, the paper makes a useful contribution by formulating villi/crypt measurement as a polyline detection task rather than a post-hoc segmentation measurement, and by providing a new annotated dataset in a domain where public data are scarce. The ablation study gives a clear account of the contribution of each loss term and of the mask-guidance mechanism, and the code/dataset release plan is a strength for reproducibility. However, the central evaluation claim about celiac grade classification is only meaningful if the ground-truth grade labels are defined independently of the manual polyline measurements; the manuscript does not state how those labels were obtained. Since the reported classification accuracy is computed by thresholding the predicted ratio, it may simply restate the measurement error rather than validate a diagnostic hypothesis. The evaluation also rests on a single 70-image test split with no error bars or significance testing, which weakens the confidence in the headline 11-point accuracy gain.

major comments (4)
  1. [§4 and §5.1] The manuscript never specifies how the ground-truth Marsh grade label for each test image was obtained. Section 4 describes only polyline, villi-shoulder, and crypt-border annotations, while Section 5.1 defines grade thresholds from self-cited reference [7] and states that the average villi-to-crypt ratio determines the grade. If those thresholds were applied to the manual polyline ratios to generate the test labels, then Table 2's accuracy is a deterministic function of the predicted ratio crossing the same cutoffs; the 11-point improvement over LETR would then be a restatement of the ratio MAE improvement in Table 1 (0.704 to 0.472) rather than an independent diagnostic evaluation. Please clarify the label generation procedure, report inter-observer agreement for the manual polyline annotations, and, if possible, evaluate against independently assigned clinical grades.
  2. [§5.1, Table 1 and Table 2] All localization, measurement, and classification numbers are reported on a single fixed 70-image test split, with no repeated runs, cross-validation, confidence intervals, or significance tests. With only 70 test images, the reported accuracy differences (e.g., 70.10% to 81.42% for multi-class grading) are not shown to be statistically reliable. The authors should report variance across multiple seeds or bootstrap confidence intervals and provide per-class confusion matrices for the grade classification task.
  3. [§5.1, Eq. (2)] The true-positive criterion for localization is stated as 'normalized chamfer distance below 0.05,' but the normalization is not defined. It is unclear whether the distance is normalized by image dimensions, polyline length, or another quantity, making precision, recall, and mAP numbers not reproducible. Additionally, Eq. (2) defines chamfer distance with squared L2 distances, so the relationship between the loss used in training and the threshold used for evaluation should be clarified.
  4. [§3.3 and Table 4] The robustness claim for mask mixup is only weakly supported by the ablation: Table 4 shows that adding mask mixup changes ratio MAE from 0.5134 to 0.4722 and crypt MAE from 7.01 to 6.83, while villi MAE actually degrades from 16.98 to 14.39 only after also including other components. The sensitivity to the mixup beta range delta and to the weak segmentor capacity (trained to 50%) is not analyzed, and hyperparameters were selected on the validation set without a final held-out evaluation protocol that accounts for this selection. Please report the variance of these ablation results and the sensitivity of the main gains to the chosen delta range.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] There are typographical and spacing inconsistencies in the method name ('M EASURE NET' vs 'MeasureNet'), and the abstract reports 81% multi-class accuracy while the conclusion reports 81.4%; please standardize all numbers.
  2. [§5.1] The grade thresholds (Vd:Cd > 3, 1.05-3, 0.95-1.05, <0.95) are taken from a self-cited reference [7] without independent validation on this dataset; even if the label generation is clarified, the paper should discuss how threshold choices affect the reported accuracy, since small ratio errors near the boundaries can change the grade.
  3. [Table 3] Table 3 reports results for 2-, 3-, and 4-point polylines, but it is unclear whether the 2- and 4-point models were trained with the same total number of queries, loss weights, and training schedule as the 3-point model; the comparison should state the training protocol for each configuration.
  4. [§3.2] The dynamic time warping loss L_DTW is described as computed between 'predicted contour of VS and CB,' but the contour extraction from segmentation masks is not described; please specify how the contour is obtained and whether the DTW loss is differentiable with respect to the segmentation output.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the measurement core is externally grounded, while the reported classification accuracy is a derived thresholded summary rather than an independent fitted prediction.

full rationale

The paper's load-bearing derivation is the measurement task: MeasureNet is trained with localization, Chamfer, length, and part-length losses against manual polyline annotations (Eqs. 1-11), and the headline measurement and localization results in Table 1 are evaluated against those same external manual annotations. This core is self-contained and independently grounded. The grade-classification results in Table 2 are a deterministic post-processing of the predicted villi-to-crypt ratio using the thresholds defined in Section 5.1, so they inherit the measurement objective rather than testing a separate diagnostic hypothesis; however, grades are not used as training labels, so this is a compositional evaluation, not a circular fit. The paper never specifies how the ground-truth grade labels were obtained: Section 4 describes polyline, villi-shoulder, and crypt-border annotations but does not state whether Marsh grades were assigned independently or generated by thresholding the manual ratios. If the latter, the classification accuracy adds no information beyond the ratio MAE already reported in Table 1, and the thresholds are cited from reference [7], which has overlapping authorship with the present paper. These are missing-definition and validation limitations rather than a reduction of the central measurement claim, and the self-citation is not used to forbid alternatives or justify the architecture. The measurement-based core therefore remains independent, and the overall circularity burden is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on clinical thresholds from a self-cited study, a pathological approximation for crypt length, and the reliability of manual polyline annotations. The free parameters are mostly hyperparameters and evaluation thresholds; none are fitted to the test set, but several are chosen via validation set grid search.

free parameters (5)
  • mixup beta range delta = [0.2, 0.4]
    Sampled from Beta distribution for mask feature mixup; chosen via grid search on the 70-image validation set (Section 5.2).
  • polyline point count = 3
    Start, middle, end points; ablation in Table 3 shows 3-point is chosen over 2 or 4; affects all measurement results.
  • chamfer distance threshold for true positive = 0.05
    Normalized chamfer distance below 0.05 defines a true positive for mAP, precision, and recall; hand-set in Section 5.1.
  • focal loss hyperparameters alpha, gamma = 0.25, 2
    Standard values from Lin et al.; fixed, but affect classification of polyline instances.
  • weak segmentor capacity = 50%
    The weak segmentor is 'trained to 50% capacity' (Section 3.3), but the exact operationalization is unspecified.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Vd:Cd ratio thresholds (3, 1.05, 0.95) define normal and Marsh grades
    Section 5.1 adopts thresholds from Das et al. [7], which includes authors of this paper; no re-validation on this dataset.
  • domain assumption Crypt length can be approximated as distance between villi shoulder and crypt border
    Section 3, Figure 2; this pathological insight underpins the segmentation-mask auxiliary guidance; error analysis in Fig 5 shows it often fails in severe disease.
  • domain assumption Three-point polylines capture villi and crypt length accurately
    Section 3 and Table 3; 2-point is insufficient and 4-point adds minimal benefit; but the ground truth itself is converted from 2 to 4 point annotations.
  • domain assumption Pathologist manual annotations are reliable ground truth
    Section 4 says annotations were validated by multiple pathologists, but no inter-observer agreement metrics are reported.
  • standard math DINO-DETR and SegFormer architectures work as described in their original papers
    The method relies on off-the-shelf transformer backbones and losses; no formal proof required.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of MeasureNet: Measurement Based Celiac Disease Identification." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TBJPEMDH

@misc{pith2026241201182,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: MeasureNet: Measurement Based Celiac Disease Identification},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TBJPEMDH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.01182}
}
read the original abstract

Celiac disease is an autoimmune disorder triggered by the consumption of gluten. It causes damage to the villi, the finger-like projections in the small intestine that are responsible for nutrient absorption. Additionally, the crypts, which form the base of the villi, are also affected, impairing the regenerative process. The deterioration in villi length, computed as the villi-to-crypt length ratio, indicates the severity of celiac disease. However, manual measurement of villi-crypt length can be both time-consuming and susceptible to inter-observer variability, leading to inconsistencies in diagnosis. While some methods can perform measurement as a post-hoc process, they are prone to errors in the initial stages. This gap underscores the need for pathologically driven solutions that enhance measurement accuracy and reduce human error in celiac disease assessments. Our proposed method, MeasureNet, is a pathologically driven polyline detection framework incorporating polyline localization and object-driven losses specifically designed for measurement tasks. Furthermore, we leverage segmentation model to provide auxiliary guidance about crypt location when crypt are partially visible. To ensure that model is not overdependent on segmentation mask we enhance model robustness through a mask feature mixup technique. Additionally, we introduce a novel dataset for grading celiac disease, consisting of 750 annotated duodenum biopsy images. MeasureNet achieves an 82.66% classification accuracy for binary classification and 81% accuracy for multi-class grading of celiac disease. Code: https://github.com/dair-iitd/MeasureNet

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.01182 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Challenges in length measurement: Measuring length [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Duodenal biopsy of celiac patients, indicating Villi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. During training, given an input image (I), the segmentation models Ss and Sw predict strong (Ms) and weak (Mw) segmentation masks. Features are extracted from the image (fI ) as well as from each mask (fs and fw). To mitigate over-dependence on mask features and reduce exposure bias, we apply feature mixup (fm) before the Feature Extraction (FE) stage. The image and mixed mask features are then combined using the Fe… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Qualitative performance of MeasureNet. First column shows Original Image, second, third, fourth and fifth column shows [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Three main types of errors include: 1) Missing or incor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Qualitative performance comparison of various models for villi and crypt detection and localization. Columns show the original [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [7]

    Quanti- tative histology-based classification system for assessment of the intestinal mucosal histological changes in patients with celiac disease

    Prasenjit Das, Gaurav PS Gahlot, Alka Singh, Vandana Baloda, Ramakant Rawat, Anil K Verma, Gaurav Khanna, Maitrayee Roy, Archana George, Ashok Singh, et al. Quanti- tative histology-based classification system for assessment of the intestinal mucosal histological changes in patients with celiac disease. Intestinal research, 17(3):387–397, 2019. 1, 2, 6

    work page 2019

  2. [1]

    Why exposure bias matters: An imitation learning perspective of error accumulation in language gen- eration

    Kushal Arora, Layla El Asri, Hareesh Bahuleyan, and Jackie Chi Kit Cheung. Why exposure bias matters: An imitation learning perspective of error accumulation in language gen- eration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.01171, 2022. 2, 3

    arXiv 2022

  3. [2]

    Beit: Bert pre-training of image transformers

    Hangbo Bao, Li Dong, Songhao Piao, and Furu Wei. Beit: Bert pre-training of image transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.08254, 2021. 1, 7

    arXiv 2021

  4. [3]

    Quantitative image anal- ysis for evaluation of tumor response in clinical oncology

    Wen-Li Cai and Guo-Bin Hong. Quantitative image anal- ysis for evaluation of tumor response in clinical oncology. Chronic diseases and translational medicine , 4(01):18–28,

    work page

  5. [4]

    End-to- end object detection with transformers

    Nicolas Carion, Francisco Massa, Gabriel Synnaeve, Nicolas Usunier, Alexander Kirillov, and Sergey Zagoruyko. End-to- end object detection with transformers. In European confer- ence on computer vision, pages 213–229. Springer, 2020. 3

    2020

  6. [5]

    Celiac disease deep learning image clas- sification using convolutional neural networks

    Joaquim Carreras. Celiac disease deep learning image clas- sification using convolutional neural networks. Journal of Imaging, 10(8):200, 2024. 2

    work page 2024

  7. [6]

    Comparison of the interobserver repro- ducibility with different histologic criteria used in celiac dis- ease

    Gino Roberto Corazza, Vincenzo Villanacci, Claudia Zam- belli, Massimo Milione, Ombretta Luinetti, Carla Vindigni, Caterina Chioda, Luca Albarello, Daniela Bartolini, and Francesco Donato. Comparison of the interobserver repro- ducibility with different histologic criteria used in celiac dis- ease. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 5(7):838– 843, 2007. 1

    work page 2007

  8. [8]

    Gluten-sensitive enteropathy (celiac disease): controversies in diagnosis and classification

    Arzu Ensari. Gluten-sensitive enteropathy (celiac disease): controversies in diagnosis and classification. Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine, 134(6):826–836, 2010. 1

    work page 2010

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    Hierarchical recurrent attention networks for structured online maps

    Namdar Homayounfar, Wei-Chiu Ma, Shrinidhi Kowshika Lakshmikanth, and Raquel Urtasun. Hierarchical recurrent attention networks for structured online maps. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 3417–3426, 2018. 3, 4

    2018

  2. [10]

    A deep learning-based precision volume calcu- lation approach for kidney and tumor segmentation on com- puted tomography images

    Chiu-Han Hsiao, Tzu-Lung Sun, Ping-Cherng Lin, Tsung- Yu Peng, Yu-Hsin Chen, Chieh-Yun Cheng, Feng-Jung Yang, Shao-Yu Yang, Chih-Horng Wu, Frank Yeong-Sung Lin, et al. A deep learning-based precision volume calcu- lation approach for kidney and tumor segmentation on com- puted...

    2022

  3. [11]

    Segmentation-based quantitative measurements in renal ct imaging using deep learning

    Konstantinos Koukoutegos, Richard ’s Heeren, Liesbeth De Wever, Frederik De Keyzer, Frederik Maes, and Hilde Bosmans. Segmentation-based quantitative measurements in renal ct imaging using deep learning. European Radiology Experimental, 8(1):110, 2024. 2

    2024

  4. [12]

    Line-cnn: End- to-end traffic line detection with line proposal unit

    Xiang Li, Jun Li, Xiaolin Hu, and Jian Yang. Line-cnn: End- to-end traffic line detection with line proposal unit. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems , 21(1): 248–258, 2019. 2

    2019

  5. [13]

    Focal loss for dense object detection

    Tsung-Yi Lin, Priya Goyal, Ross Girshick, Kaiming He, and Piotr Doll ´ar. Focal loss for dense object detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 42(2):318–327, 2020. 4

    2020

  6. [14]

    A com- prehensive review of image line segment detection and de- scription: Taxonomies, comparisons, and challenges

    Xinyu Lin, Yingjie Zhou, Yipeng Liu, and Ce Zhu. A com- prehensive review of image line segment detection and de- scription: Taxonomies, comparisons, and challenges. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,

  7. [15]

    Swin transformer v2: Scaling up capacity and resolution

    Ze Liu, Han Hu, Yutong Lin, Zhuliang Yao, Zhenda Xie, Yixuan Wei, Jia Ning, Yue Cao, Zheng Zhang, Li Dong, et al. Swin transformer v2: Scaling up capacity and resolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vi- sion and pattern recognition, pages 12009–12019,...

    2022

  8. [16]

    Yolino: Generic single shot polyline de- tection in real time

    Annika Meyer, Philipp Skudlik, Jan-Hendrik Pauls, and Christoph Stiller. Yolino: Generic single shot polyline de- tection in real time. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Inter- national Conference on Computer Vision, pages 2916–2925,

  9. [17]

    A deep learning approach for fully automated measurements of lower extremity alignment in radiographic images

    Ki-Ryum Moon, Byoung-Dai Lee, and Mu Sook Lee. A deep learning approach for fully automated measurements of lower extremity alignment in radiographic images. Scientific Reports, 13(1):14692, 2023. 1

    2023

  10. [18]

    Spatial as deep: Spatial cnn for traffic scene understanding

    Xingang Pan, Jianping Shi, Ping Luo, Xiaogang Wang, and Xiaoou Tang. Spatial as deep: Spatial cnn for traffic scene understanding. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, 2018. 2

    2018

  11. [19]

    Deeplsd: Line segment detection and refinement with deep image gradients

    R ´emi Pautrat, Daniel Barath, Viktor Larsson, Martin R Os- wald, and Marc Pollefeys. Deeplsd: Line segment detection and refinement with deep image gradients. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 17327–17336, 2023. 3

    2023

  12. [20]

    Automated classification of celiac disease in histopathological images: a multi-scale approach

    Simon P ¨uttmann, Lluis Borras Ferris, Niccol`o Marini, Witali Aswolinsky, Simona Vatrano, Filippo Fragetta, Iris Nagte- gaal, Chella van der Post, Francesco Ciompi, Manfredo At- zori, et al. Automated classification of celiac disease in histopathological images: a multi-scale...

    2024

  13. [21]

    U- net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmen- tation

    Olaf Ronneberger, Philipp Fischer, and Thomas Brox. U- net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmen- tation. In Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention–MICCAI 2015: 18th international conference, Munich, Germany, October 5-9, 2015, proceedings, pa...

    2015

  14. [22]

    Celiacnet: Celiac disease severity diagnosis on duodenal histopathological images using deep residual net- works

    Rasoul Sali, Lubaina Ehsan, Kamran Kowsari, Marium Khan, Christopher A Moskaluk, Sana Syed, and Donald E Brown. Celiacnet: Celiac disease severity diagnosis on duodenal histopathological images using deep residual net- works. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Bioin- 9 f...

    2019

  15. [23]

    Mobilenetv2: Inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks

    Mark Sandler, Andrew Howard, Menglong Zhu, Andrey Zh- moginov, and Liang-Chieh Chen. Mobilenetv2: Inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recogni- tion, pages 4510–4520, 2018. 5

    2018

  16. [24]

    Deep learning automation of kidney, liver, and spleen segmentation for organ volume measurements in autoso- mal dominant polycystic kidney disease

    Arman Sharbatdaran, Dominick Romano, Kurt Teichman, Hreedi Dev, Syed I Raza, Akshay Goel, Mina C Moghadam, Jon D Blumenfeld, James M Chevalier, Daniil Shimonov, et al. Deep learning automation of kidney, liver, and spleen segmentation for organ volume measurements in autoso- m...

    2022

  17. [25]

    Keep your eyes on the lane: Real-time attention-guided lane detection

    Lucas Tabelini, Rodrigo Berriel, Thiago M Paixao, Claudine Badue, Alberto F De Souza, and Thiago Oliveira-Santos. Keep your eyes on the lane: Real-time attention-guided lane detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages...

  18. [26]

    Polylanenet: Lane estimation via deep polynomial regres- sion

    Lucas Tabelini, Rodrigo Berriel, Thiago M Paixao, Claudine Badue, Alberto F De Souza, and Thiago Oliveira-Santos. Polylanenet: Lane estimation via deep polynomial regres- sion. In 2020 25th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), pages 6150–6156. IEEE, 2021. 2

    2020

  19. [27]

    Efficientnet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks

    Mingxing Tan and Quoc Le. Efficientnet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. In International conference on machine learning, pages 6105–6114. PMLR,

  20. [28]

    Evaluating the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer using the recist system with shorter-axis measurements: a retrospective multicenter study

    Yusuke Taniyama, Kentaro Murakami, Naoya Yoshida, Kozue Takahashi, Hisahiro Matsubara, Hideo Baba, and Takashi Kamei. Evaluating the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer using the recist system with shorter-axis measurements: a retrospective multicenter stu...

    2021

  21. [29]

    Lsdnet: Trainable modification of lsd algorithm for real-time line segment detection

    Lev Teplyakov, Leonid Erlygin, and Evgeny Shvets. Lsdnet: Trainable modification of lsd algorithm for real-time line segment detection. IEEE Access , 10:45256–45265, 2022. 3

    2022

  22. [30]

    Mlp-mixer: An all-mlp architecture for vision

    Ilya O Tolstikhin, Neil Houlsby, Alexander Kolesnikov, Lu- cas Beyer, Xiaohua Zhai, Thomas Unterthiner, Jessica Yung, Andreas Steiner, Daniel Keysers, Jakob Uszkoreit, et al. Mlp-mixer: An all-mlp architecture for vision. Advances in neural information processing systems, 34:2...

  23. [31]

    Degpr: Deep guided posterior regularization for multi-class cell de- tection and counting

    Aayush Kumar Tyagi, Chirag Mohapatra, Prasenjit Das, Govind Makharia, Lalita Mehra, Prathosh AP, et al. Degpr: Deep guided posterior regularization for multi-class cell de- tection and counting. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recogni...

    2023

  24. [32]

    Celiac Disease: A Comprehensive Guide Pa- perback

    Pankaj V ohra. Celiac Disease: A Comprehensive Guide Pa- perback. National Book Trust, 2016. 1

    2016

  25. [33]

    Lsd: A fast line seg- ment detector with a false detection control

    Rafael Grompone V on Gioi, Jeremie Jakubowicz, Jean- Michel Morel, and Gregory Randall. Lsd: A fast line seg- ment detector with a false detection control. IEEE trans- actions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 32(4): 722–732, 2008. 2

    2008

  26. [34]

    Segformer: Simple and efficient design for semantic segmentation with transform- ers

    Enze Xie, Wenhai Wang, Zhiding Yu, Anima Anandkumar, Jose M Alvarez, and Ping Luo. Segformer: Simple and efficient design for semantic segmentation with transform- ers. Advances in neural information processing systems, 34: 12077–12090, 2021. 1, 2, 4, 6, 7

    2021

  27. [35]

    Line segment detection using transformers without edges

    Yifan Xu, Weijian Xu, David Cheung, and Zhuowen Tu. Line segment detection using transformers without edges. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vi- sion and Pattern Recognition , pages 4257–4266, 2021. 3, 7

    2021

  28. [36]

    Holistically- attracted wireframe parsing

    Nan Xue, Tianfu Wu, Song Bai, Fudong Wang, Gui-Song Xia, Liangpei Zhang, and Philip HS Torr. Holistically- attracted wireframe parsing. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 2788–2797, 2020. 3

    2020

  29. [37]

    mixup: Beyond empirical risk minimization

    Hongyi Zhang. mixup: Beyond empirical risk minimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.09412, 2017. 4, 5

    2017 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Dino: Detr with improved denoising anchor boxes for end-to-end object detection

    Hao Zhang, Feng Li, Shilong Liu, Lei Zhang, Hang Su, Jun Zhu, Lionel M Ni, and Heung-Yeung Shum. Dino: Detr with improved denoising anchor boxes for end-to-end object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.03605, 2022. 2, 3 10 MeasureNet: Measurement Based Celiac Disease Identif...

    2022 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Effect of Point Selection We used three points to represent a polyline, replicating the first or last point when the original annotation contained only two points

    Ablation Studies 8.1. Effect of Point Selection We used three points to represent a polyline, replicating the first or last point when the original annotation contained only two points. Alternatively, the middle point of the line segment can be used for polylines with two poin...

  32. [40]

    Implementation Details Yolino, originally designed for single-class lane predictions, was adapted for our task by training two separate models: one for villi and another for crypts. The polyline annota- tions were reformatted to align with lane detection require- ments, and ea...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.