REVIEW 3 cited by
Chaos Engineering: A Multi-Vocal Literature Review
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Organizations, particularly medium and large enterprises, typically rely heavily on complex, distributed systems to deliver critical services and products. However, the growing complexity of these systems poses challenges in ensuring service availability, performance, and reliability. Traditional resilience testing methods often fail to capture the intricate interactions and failure modes of modern systems. Chaos Engineering addresses these challenges by proactively testing how systems in production behave under turbulent conditions, allowing developers to uncover and resolve potential issues before they escalate into outages. Though chaos engineering has received growing attention from researchers and practitioners alike, we observed a lack of reviews that synthesize insights from both academic and grey literature. Hence, we conducted a Multivocal Literature Review (MLR) on chaos engineering to address this research gap by systematically analyzing 96 academic and grey literature sources published between January 2016 and April 2024. We first used the chosen sources to derive a unified definition of chaos engineering and to identify key functionalities, components, and adoption drivers. We also developed a taxonomy for chaos engineering platforms and compared the relevant tools using it. Finally, we analyzed the current state of chaos engineering research and identified several open research issues.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Ecoscape: Fault Tolerance Benchmark for Adaptive Remediation Strategies in Real-Time Edge ML
Ecoscape provides a configurable chaos-injection benchmark with a weighted SLO violation score for comparing Kubernetes remediation strategies in edge ML inference.
-
Resilience Evaluation of Kubernetes in Cloud-Edge Environments via Failure Injection
Under network delay and partition faults, cloud-edge Kubernetes deployments show tighter response-time distributions than cloud-only deployments, while cloud deployments stay more stable under bandwidth throttling and...
-
Designing a Custom Chaos Engineering Framework for Enhanced System Resilience at Softtech
The paper proposes a compliance-aware, four-phase chaos engineering framework for Softtech using LitmusChaos and a standard monitoring stack, but provides no implementation or validation.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.