Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 53 references

CubeFormer: A Simple yet Effective Baseline for Lightweight Image Super-Resolution

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read CubeFormer lifts lightweight image super-resolution by replacing 2D attention with 3D cube attention, reporting state-of-the-art PSNR and SSIM on standard benchmarks.

desk verdict A solid incremental SR architecture whose SOTA claim is confounded by an unablated frequency loss; the cube attention idea itself looks genuine and the paper deserves review. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.02234 v1 pith:O2YM5TEJ submitted 2024-12-03 cs.CV

Jikai Wang , Huan Zheng , Jianbing Shen This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords lightweightimagesuper-resolutioncubeattention3Dvisiontransformerfeaturediversityfrequencyreconstructionlosstexturerecovery
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that lightweight image super-resolution models are held back by limited feature diversity, which blurs fine textures, and proposes CubeFormer, a transformer that replaces flat 2D attention with 3D cube attention. In cube attention, query, key, and value tensors are cut into small 3D cubes so that every voxel interacts with others across space and channels. Two accompanying blocks, intra-cube and inter-cube, handle local and global modeling respectively. On standard benchmarks (B100, Urban100, Manga109) at scales 2, 3, and 4, CubeFormer reports the highest PSNR and SSIM among lightweight methods, and a lite variant does the same among efficient methods. The takeaway is that explicitly engineering feature variety through 3D attention is a workable route to better detail recovery without large models.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is cube attention, which treats the feature tensor as a 3D volume and divides it into small cubes rather than 2D windows. Block sampling produces cubes for intra-cube attention (local, voxel-wise interaction inside each cube), and grid sampling produces cube grids for inter-cube attention (cross-cube, sparse global interaction). The attention output is computed as $X_{\text{cube}} = V_{\text{cube}}\operatorname{Softmax}(Q_{\text{cube}}^T K_{\text{cube}})$ over the flattened cube vectors. These two attention types are packaged into Intra-CTB and Inter-CTB, which follow the standard transformer block layout (layer norm, attention, FFN with convolutions), and are stacked in cube transformer groups along with MBConv, channel shuffle, and enhanced spatial attention.

What would settle it

Training the same architecture but replacing cube attention with a 3D convolution of comparable receptive field, keeping the frequency loss, and showing no PSNR drop on Urban100 x4 would contradict the claim that cube attention itself is responsible. Alternatively, measuring feature diversity (for example, the effective rank of the feature Gram matrix) and finding no increase relative to SwinIR would directly falsify the stated mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

CubeFormer's central claim is that constrained feature diversity is a root cause of mediocre lightweight super-resolution, and that generalizing attention from 2D planes to 3D cubes removes that bottleneck. Instead of attending within spatial windows or along channels separately, cube attention partitions Q, K, V into non-overlapping cubes of size h×w×c and computes affinities inside each cube (intra-cube) and between cubes sampled on a grid (inter-cube). The intra-cube transformer block models local voxel relationships; the inter-cube block performs sparse global aggregation. Together they produce richer, more varied features that translate into sharper edges and finer textures in the output HR image. The paper supports this with quantitative results across three benchmarks and feature-map visualizations, plus ablations showing cube attention outperforms spatial attention, channel attention, and their simple combination.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes the performance gain comes specifically from the cube attention mechanism increasing feature diversity, but it does not quantitatively measure feature diversity or fully separate the effect of cube attention from the frequency-reconstruction loss and the other components in the pipeline.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Cube attention can serve as a drop-in replacement for spatial or channel attention in existing lightweight SR backbones, improving PSNR without increasing parameter count.
  • The intra/inter block design gives a concrete recipe for concurrent local and global modeling in low-level vision transformers.
  • The lite variant shows the same attention design scales down to under 400K parameters while staying competitive, which matters for mobile deployment.
  • Adding a frequency-reconstruction loss with a small weight (0.01) consistently helps detail recovery and can be reused in other SR frameworks.
  • The PSNR-versus-parameter trend suggests cube attention keeps improving with scale, unlike some baselines that plateau, implying headroom for larger CubeFormer variants.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If cube attention's benefit truly comes from feature diversity, a similar 3D partitioning could be applied to other low-level vision tasks such as denoising, deblurring, or compression artifact removal, where texture detail is equally critical.
  • The cube size (8×8×4) is a hyperparameter that likely trades local coherence against global context; sweeping it on Urban100 could reveal whether channel-depth cubes matter more than spatial ones.
  • Feature diversity, if measured directly (e.g., by effective rank or entropy of feature maps), could become a practical training signal or architecture-selection criterion for lightweight SR.
  • Cube attention's 3D grouping is conceptually close to spatiotemporal attention in video models; adapting it to video SR by treating frames as the third dimension is a natural testable extension.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes CubeFormer, a lightweight image super-resolution network whose main novelty is 3D cube attention: features are partitioned into cubes, intra-cube attention models local 3D interactions and inter-cube attention models cross-cube global interactions. Two corresponding transformer blocks, Intra-CTB and Inter-CTB, are combined with MBConv, channel shuffle, and ESA in a Cube Transformer Group, and a lite variant uses channel splitting for efficiency. Training uses L1 plus a weighted frequency-domain L1 loss. On B100, Urban100, and Manga109, CubeFormer reports the highest PSNR/SSIM among lightweight methods at ×2, ×3, and ×4, and CubeFormer-lite similarly leads its efficient-SR comparison. Ablations replace cube attention with spatial, channel, or combined attention and remove or reorder the intra/inter blocks.

Significance. If the reported gains are actually attributable to cube attention, the work offers a simple, parameter-efficient architectural baseline that outperforms established lightweight SR transformers, and the public release of code and models would aid reproducibility. The paper also correctly identifies and partially tests the interaction between spatial and channel information. However, the significance is currently undercut by a missing control: the frequency reconstruction loss is part of the training objective but is never ablated, so the headline SOTA comparisons in Tables 1 and 2 cannot be cleanly attributed to the proposed architecture. The feature-diversity mechanism claimed in the abstract and Section 1 is only supported by qualitative feature-map inspection, not by a quantitative measure. The paper does provide useful ablations of the attention variant and of the intra/inter blocks, which are internally consistent, and the experimental protocol otherwise follows standard SR practice.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.4, Eq. (12)–(13); Tables 1–3] The frequency reconstruction loss L_fr = ||F(Ihr) − F(Igt)||_1 is added to the spatial L1 loss with λ = 0.01, but no experiment isolates it. The ablation in Table 3 compares attention variants with the total loss held fixed, so it shows only that cube attention helps under a loss that already includes L_fr. The baselines in Tables 1 and 2 (e.g., OmniSR, SwinIR, SeemoRe-T) are typically trained with plain L1, so their reported numbers do not account for the extra supervision signal. Because the largest gains are on Manga109 (×4: 31.39 vs. 31.02 for OmniSR, +0.37 dB), a dataset with strong high-frequency structure where FFT-domain losses are known to help, the observed SOTA advantage cannot be attributed to cube attention without a control. Please add an ablation that trains CubeFormer with λ = 0 (no frequency loss) and, ideally, retrains at least one strong baseline such as OmniSR with the same frequency loss, reporting both PSNR and SSIM on all three benchmarks.
  2. [§1, Fig. 1] The central claim that prior methods suffer from constrained feature diversity and that cube attention improves it is supported only by a qualitative feature-map visualization. A quantitative measure (e.g., effective rank or singular-value spectrum of feature maps, or channel-activation statistics) would make the mechanistic claim testable. Without such a measure, the link between cube attention, feature diversity, and the PSNR gains remains an unverified hypothesis, and the current phrase in the abstract and contribution list that cube attention 'encourages feature variety' is not directly evidenced.
  3. [Table 4] The notation for the intra/inter ablation is ambiguous and appears garbled in the table header. The text says that 'Intra-CTB and Inter-CTB represent removing the Inter-CTB or Intra-CTB from CubeFormer, respectively,' yet the table lists rows named 'Intra-CTB', 'Inter-CTB', 'Intra-CTB-2', and 'Inter-CTB-2'. Please clarify the exact configuration of each row (which blocks are present, which attention mechanism is used in each position) and, if these variants differ in parameter count or FLOPs, report those numbers so that the comparison is not confounded by capacity differences.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§1, Abstract] There are grammatical slips such as 'To respond this issue' and 'To response this issue'; please proofread the introduction and abstract.
  2. [§4.1, Implementation Details] The text states 'our CubeFormer utilize six CAG layers' but the architecture uses Cube Transformer Groups (CTGs); please correct 'CAG' to 'CTG'.
  3. [Fig. 5] The axis labels in Figure 5 appear corrupted with sequences like '/uni00000015/uni00000013/...', making the parameter and PSNR axes unreadable. Please regenerate the figure with proper font rendering.
  4. [§4.2, Quantitative results] The list of compared methods in the text includes ShuffleMixer and ESRT, but Table 1 does not contain ShuffleMixer and includes ESRT only for ×3 and ×4; please align the text with the tables or explain why some methods are omitted at some scales.
  5. [Fig. 6 caption] There is a typo in the caption: 'Tow images' should be 'Two images'.
  6. [§4.2, Qualitative Results] The visual comparisons in Figure 6 are useful, but no quantitative measure such as LPIPS or DISTS is reported; adding one would strengthen the claim of better perceptual detail without relying only on PSNR/SSIM.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: CubeFormer's claims are evaluated on fixed external SR benchmarks and the architecture is not defined in terms of the reported outcomes.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that the proposed cube attention and Intra/Inter-CTB blocks improve lightweight super-resolution, and this claim is supported by PSNR/SSIM measurements on the fixed, external B100, Urban100, and Manga109 benchmarks. No step in the derivation reduces to its own inputs: cube attention is defined geometrically (Eqs. 4-6) and evaluated after training, rather than fitted to the test metrics; the cube sizes and head counts are stated as fixed implementation details, not tuned against the benchmarks reported. The auxiliary frequency loss L_fr (Eq. 12) is included in the total loss (Eq. 13) for all internal ablations in Table 3, so those ablations still compare attention variants under an identical training loss and do not circularly force the cube-attention conclusion. The concern that L_fr may explain part of the absolute gain over baselines trained with plain L1 is a correctness/confound issue, not a circularity issue, and this pass does not treat it as circularity. There are no load-bearing self-citations, no imported uniqueness theorem, and no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The paper is therefore self-contained with respect to the circularity criteria.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim (SOTA lightweight SR) depends on standard SR assumptions and a handful of hand-chosen hyperparameters (loss weight, cube sizes, group count, channel width). No new physical or mathematical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • lambda_frequency_loss = 0.01
    Weight for frequency reconstruction loss in Eq. (13), chosen by hand.
  • cube_size_h1w1c1 = 8x8x4
    Dimensions of intra-cube attention cubes, chosen empirically.
  • grid_size_h2w2c2 = 8x8x4
    Dimensions of inter-cube attention grids, chosen empirically.
  • num_CTG_layers = 6
    Number of cube transformer groups in backbone, chosen empirically.
  • channel_width = 64
    Number of feature channels, chosen empirically.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Bicubic downsampling is the degradation model for SR, as in prior work (e.g., DIV2K).
    The paper synthesizes LR images by bicubic downsampling for training and evaluation; this is a standard assumption for SR benchmarks.
  • domain assumption PSNR and SSIM computed on the Y channel are adequate measures of SR quality.
    The paper evaluates using PSNR/SSIM on YCbCr, following common practice in SR.
  • domain assumption Pre-existing components (MBConv, ESA, channel shuffle, pixel shuffle) perform as described in the cited papers.
    The architecture relies on these standard blocks without re-derivation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of CubeFormer: A Simple yet Effective Baseline for Lightweight Image Super-Resolution." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/O2YM5TEJ

@misc{pith2026241202234,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: CubeFormer: A Simple yet Effective Baseline for Lightweight Image Super-Resolution},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/O2YM5TEJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.02234}
}
read the original abstract

Lightweight image super-resolution (SR) methods aim at increasing the resolution and restoring the details of an image using a lightweight neural network. However, current lightweight SR methods still suffer from inferior performance and unpleasant details. Our analysis reveals that these methods are hindered by constrained feature diversity, which adversely impacts feature representation and detail recovery. To respond this issue, we propose a simple yet effective baseline called CubeFormer, designed to enhance feature richness by completing holistic information aggregation. To be specific, we introduce cube attention, which expands 2D attention to 3D space, facilitating exhaustive information interactions, further encouraging comprehensive information extraction and promoting feature variety. In addition, we inject block and grid sampling strategies to construct intra-cube transformer blocks (Intra-CTB) and inter-cube transformer blocks (Inter-CTB), which perform local and global modeling, respectively. Extensive experiments show that our CubeFormer achieves state-of-the-art performance on commonly used SR benchmarks. Our source code and models will be publicly available.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.02234 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. An overview of SwinIR [25], SwinIR-CA [49], Omni￾SR [42], and the proposed CubeFormer. We visualize the fea￾ture maps extracted by the backbone network and restored HR im￾ages of these methods. Notably, SwinIR, SwinIR-CA, and Omni￾SR capture fewer low-level details in their feature maps, leading to diminished texture clarity in the resulting HR images. In contrast, CubeFormer exhibits an enhanced capacity for learni… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overall architecture of CubeFormer. We utilize a convolutional layer to extract shallow features from the LR image and a series of Cube Transformer Groups (CTGs) for deep feature extraction. As shown in the bottom-left sub-figure, CTG incorporates the proposed Intra-CTB and Inter-CTB, channel shuffle, MBConv block, and enhanced spatial attention (ESA) block. In detail, Intra/Inter-CTB inherits the structure of the v… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Illustration of intra-cube and inter-cube attention. The inputs are fed into convolutional layers to generate query, key, and value. Next, these components are further divided into 3D cubes and 3D cube grids by block and grid strategy, which are further used for obtaining affinity matrix. 3.2. Cube Attention In prior research, homogeneous operators, such as spa￾tial and channel attention, are commonly employed eithe… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Illustration of the lite version of Cube Transformer Group (CTG-lite). In CTG-lite, an additional channel splitting operation is introduced following the channel shuffle, partitioning the features into two groups with half the original channel count. ture map into two …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: PSNR vs. the number of model parameters of dif￾ferent lightweight SR methods on Urban100 dataset under x4 scale. Both the proposed CubeFormer and CubeFormer-lite achieve the best performance at their respective parameter scales. Former consistently surpasses other meth…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Visual comparison of our CubeFormer and other state-of-the-art lightweight SR methods including bicubic interpolation, classical CNN-based method EDSR [26], state-of-the-art methods SwinIR [25] and OmniSR [42]. Tow images from Urban100 dataset [15] and Manga109 dataset…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Fast, accurate, and lightweight super-resolution with cascading residual network

    Namhyuk Ahn, Byungkon Kang, and Kyung-Ah Sohn. Fast, accurate, and lightweight super-resolution with cascading residual network. In Proceedings of the European Confer- ence on Computer Vision, 2018. 2

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    Pre-trained image processing transformer

    Hanting Chen, Yunhe Wang, Tianyu Guo, Chang Xu, Yiping Deng, Zhenhua Liu, Siwei Ma, Chunjing Xu, Chao Xu, and Wen Gao. Pre-trained image processing transformer. InPro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2021. 2

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    Simple baselines for image restoration

    Liangyu Chen, Xiaojie Chu, Xiangyu Zhang, and Jian Sun. Simple baselines for image restoration. In European Confer- ence on Computer Vision, 2022. 3

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Activating more pixels in image super- resolution transformer

    Xiangyu Chen, Xintao Wang, Jiantao Zhou, Yu Qiao, and Chao Dong. Activating more pixels in image super- resolution transformer. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition ,

    work page

  5. [5]

    Mobile- former: Bridging mobilenet and transformer

    Yinpeng Chen, Xiyang Dai, Dongdong Chen, Mengchen Liu, Xiaoyi Dong, Lu Yuan, and Zicheng Liu. Mobile- former: Bridging mobilenet and transformer. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022. 3

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Rethinking coarse-to-fine approach in sin- gle image deblurring

    Sung-Jin Cho, Seo-Won Ji, Jun-Pyo Hong, Seung-Won Jung, and Sung-Jea Ko. Rethinking coarse-to-fine approach in sin- gle image deblurring. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF In- ternational Conference on Computer Vision, 2021. 6

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Fast, accurate and lightweight super-resolution with neural architecture search

    Xiangxiang Chu, Bo Zhang, Hailong Ma, Ruijun Xu, and Qingyuan Li. Fast, accurate and lightweight super-resolution with neural architecture search. In 2020 25th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 2021. 2

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Image super-resolution using deep convolutional net- works

    Chao Dong, Chen Change Loy, Kaiming He, and Xiaoou Tang. Image super-resolution using deep convolutional net- works. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2015. 1, 2

    work page 2015

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    An image is worth 16x16 words: Trans- formers for image recognition at scale

    Alexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn, Xiaohua Zhai, Thomas Unterthiner, Mostafa Dehghani, Matthias Minderer, Georg Heigold, Syl- vain Gelly, et al. An image is worth 16x16 words: Trans- formers for image recognition at scale. arXiv preprint a...

    2010 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Image super-resolution using knowledge distillation

    Qinquan Gao, Yan Zhao, Gen Li, and Tong Tong. Image super-resolution using knowledge distillation. In Asian Con- ference on Computer Vision, 2018. 2

    2018

  3. [11]

    Mixer-based local residual network for lightweight image super-resolution

    Garas Gendy, Nabil Sabor, Jingchao Hou, and Guanghui He. Mixer-based local residual network for lightweight image super-resolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Confer- ence on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023. 6, 7

    2023

  4. [12]

    Distill- ing the knowledge in a neural network

    Geoffrey Hinton, Oriol Vinyals, and Jeff Dean. Distill- ing the knowledge in a neural network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.02531, 2015. 2

    2015 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Mobilenets: Efficient convolu- tional neural networks for mobile vision applications

    Andrew G Howard, Menglong Zhu, Bo Chen, Dmitry Kalenichenko, Weijun Wang, Tobias Weyand, Marco An- dreetto, and Hartwig Adam. Mobilenets: Efficient convolu- tional neural networks for mobile vision applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.04861, 2017. 3, 5

    2017 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Squeeze-and-excitation net- works

    Jie Hu, Li Shen, and Gang Sun. Squeeze-and-excitation net- works. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2018. 3, 5

    2018

  7. [15]

    Sin- gle image super-resolution from transformed self-exemplars

    Jia-Bin Huang, Abhishek Singh, and Narendra Ahuja. Sin- gle image super-resolution from transformed self-exemplars. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2015. 1, 6, 8

    2015

  8. [16]

    Lightvit: Towards light-weight convolution- free vision transformers

    Tao Huang, Lang Huang, Shan You, Fei Wang, Chen Qian, and Chang Xu. Lightvit: Towards light-weight convolution- free vision transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.05557,

    arXiv

  9. [17]

    Fast and ac- curate single image super-resolution via information distil- lation network

    Zheng Hui, Xiumei Wang, and Xinbo Gao. Fast and ac- curate single image super-resolution via information distil- lation network. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2018. 2

    2018

  10. [18]

    Lightweight image super-resolution with information multi- distillation network

    Zheng Hui, Xinbo Gao, Yunchu Yang, and Xiumei Wang. Lightweight image super-resolution with information multi- distillation network. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM Inter- national Conference on Multimedia, 2019. 2, 6

    2019

  11. [19]

    Accurate image super-resolution using very deep convolutional net- works

    Jiwon Kim, Jung Kwon Lee, and Kyoung Mu Lee. Accurate image super-resolution using very deep convolutional net- works. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2016. 1

    2016

  12. [20]

    Adam: A method for stochastic optimization

    Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 ,

    arXiv

  13. [21]

    Residual local feature network for efficient super-resolution

    Fangyuan Kong, Mingxi Li, Songwei Liu, Ding Liu, Jing- wen He, Yang Bai, Fangmin Chen, and Lean Fu. Residual local feature network for efficient super-resolution. In Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022. 6, 7

    2022

  14. [22]

    Srconvnet: A transformer-style con- vnet for lightweight image super-resolution

    Feng Li, Runmin Cong, Jingjing Wu, Huihui Bai, Meng Wang, and Yao Zhao. Srconvnet: A transformer-style con- vnet for lightweight image super-resolution. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2024. 6, 7

    2024

  15. [23]

    On efficient transformer-based image pre-training for low-level vision

    Wenbo Li, Xin Lu, Shengju Qian, Jiangbo Lu, Xiangyu Zhang, and Jiaya Jia. On efficient transformer-based image pre-training for low-level vision. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.10175, 2021. 2

    2021 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Effi- cient and explicit modelling of image hierarchies for image restoration

    Yawei Li, Yuchen Fan, Xiaoyu Xiang, Denis Demandolx, Rakesh Ranjan, Radu Timofte, and Luc Van Gool. Effi- cient and explicit modelling of image hierarchies for image restoration. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023. 3

    2023

  17. [25]

    Swinir: Image restoration us- ing swin transformer

    Jingyun Liang, Jiezhang Cao, Guolei Sun, Kai Zhang, Luc Van Gool, and Radu Timofte. Swinir: Image restoration us- ing swin transformer. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF In- ternational Conference on Computer Vision, 2021. 1, 2, 6, 7, 8

    2021

  18. [26]

    Enhanced deep residual networks for sin- gle image super-resolution

    Bee Lim, Sanghyun Son, Heewon Kim, Seungjun Nah, and Kyoung Mu Lee. Enhanced deep residual networks for sin- gle image super-resolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE Con- ference on cComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition work- shops, 2017. 8

    2017

  19. [27]

    Residual feature dis- tillation network for lightweight image super-resolution

    Jie Liu, Jie Tang, and Gangshan Wu. Residual feature dis- tillation network for lightweight image super-resolution. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vi- sion, 2020. 3, 5, 6, 7

    2020

  20. [28]

    Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows

    Ze Liu, Yutong Lin, Yue Cao, Han Hu, Yixuan Wei, Zheng Zhang, Stephen Lin, and Baining Guo. Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2021. 2

    2021

  21. [29]

    Transformer for single image super-resolution

    Zhisheng Lu, Juncheng Li, Hong Liu, Chaoyan Huang, Lin- lin Zhang, and Tieyong Zeng. Transformer for single image super-resolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Confer- ence on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022. 2, 6

    2022

  22. [30]

    Latticenet: Towards lightweight image super-resolution with lattice block

    Xiaotong Luo, Yuan Xie, Yulun Zhang, Yanyun Qu, Cui- hua Li, and Yun Fu. Latticenet: Towards lightweight image super-resolution with lattice block. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, 2020. 6

    2020

  23. [31]

    Shufflenet v2: Practical guidelines for efficient cnn architec- ture design

    Ningning Ma, Xiangyu Zhang, Hai-Tao Zheng, and Jian Sun. Shufflenet v2: Practical guidelines for efficient cnn architec- ture design. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, 2018. 5

    2018

  24. [32]

    A database of human segmented natural images and its application to evaluating segmentation algorithms and measuring ecological statistics

    David Martin, Charless Fowlkes, Doron Tal, and Jitendra Malik. A database of human segmented natural images and its application to evaluating segmentation algorithms and measuring ecological statistics. In Proceedings of IEEE In- ternational Conference on Computer Vision, 2001. 6

    2001

  25. [33]

    Sketch-based manga retrieval using manga109 dataset

    Yusuke Matsui, Kota Ito, Yuji Aramaki, Azuma Fujimoto, Toru Ogawa, Toshihiko Yamasaki, and Kiyoharu Aizawa. Sketch-based manga retrieval using manga109 dataset. Mul- timedia Tools and Applications, 2017. 6, 8

    2017

  26. [34]

    Mobilevit: light- weight, general-purpose, and mobile-friendly vision trans- former

    Sachin Mehta and Mohammad Rastegari. Mobilevit: light- weight, general-purpose, and mobile-friendly vision trans- former. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.02178, 2021. 3

    2021 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Multi-attention based ul- tra lightweight image super-resolution

    Abdul Muqeet, Jiwon Hwang, Subin Yang, JungHeum Kang, Yongwoo Kim, and Sung-Ho Bae. Multi-attention based ul- tra lightweight image super-resolution. InProceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, 2020. 1, 6

    2020

  28. [36]

    Real-time single image and video super-resolution using an efficient sub-pixel convolutional neural network

    Wenzhe Shi, Jose Caballero, Ferenc Husz ´ar, Johannes Totz, Andrew P Aitken, Rob Bishop, Daniel Rueckert, and Zehan Wang. Real-time single image and video super-resolution using an efficient sub-pixel convolutional neural network. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Compu...

    2016

  29. [37]

    Hy- brid pixel-unshuffled network for lightweight image super- resolution

    Bin Sun, Yulun Zhang, Songyao Jiang, and Yun Fu. Hy- brid pixel-unshuffled network for lightweight image super- resolution. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Arti- ficial Intelligence, 2023. 2

    2023

  30. [38]

    Shufflemixer: An efficient convnet for image super-resolution

    Long Sun, Jinshan Pan, and Jinhui Tang. Shufflemixer: An efficient convnet for image super-resolution. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022. 6, 7

    2022

  31. [39]

    Spatially-adaptive feature modulation for efficient image super-resolution

    Long Sun, Jiangxin Dong, Jinhui Tang, and Jinshan Pan. Spatially-adaptive feature modulation for efficient image super-resolution. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2023. 6, 7

    2023

  32. [40]

    Ntire 2017 challenge on single image super-resolution: Methods and results

    Radu Timofte, Eirikur Agustsson, Luc Van Gool, Ming- Hsuan Yang, and Lei Zhang. Ntire 2017 challenge on single image super-resolution: Methods and results. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition workshops, 2017. 1, 6

    2017

  33. [41]

    Attention is all you need

    Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszko- reit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017. 1, 2

    2017

  34. [42]

    Omni aggregation networks for lightweight im- age super-resolution

    Hang Wang, Xuanhong Chen, Bingbing Ni, Yutian Liu, and Jinfan Liu. Omni aggregation networks for lightweight im- age super-resolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023. 1, 2, 6, 8

    2023

  35. [43]

    Global aligned structured sparsity learning for efficient image super-resolution

    Huan Wang, Yulun Zhang, Can Qin, Luc Van Gool, and Yun Fu. Global aligned structured sparsity learning for efficient image super-resolution. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Anal- ysis and Machine Intelligence, 2023. 1, 6, 7

    2023

  36. [44]

    Linformer: Self-attention with linear complexity

    Sinong Wang, Belinda Z Li, Madian Khabsa, Han Fang, and Hao Ma. Linformer: Self-attention with linear complexity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.04768, 2020. 3

    2006 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Osffnet: Omni-stage feature fu- sion network for lightweight image super-resolution

    Yang Wang and Tao Zhang. Osffnet: Omni-stage feature fu- sion network for lightweight image super-resolution. In Pro- ceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence ,

  38. [46]

    Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity

    Zhou Wang, Alan C Bovik, Hamid R Sheikh, and Eero P Si- moncelli. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Process- ing, 2004. 6

    2004

  39. [47]

    Lite vision trans- former with enhanced self-attention

    Chenglin Yang, Yilin Wang, Jianming Zhang, He Zhang, Zijun Wei, Zhe Lin, and Alan Yuille. Lite vision trans- former with enhanced self-attention. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022. 3

    2022

  40. [48]

    See more details: Efficient image super- resolution by experts mining

    Eduard Zamfir, Zongwei Wu, Nancy Mehta, Yulun Zhang, and Radu Timofte. See more details: Efficient image super- resolution by experts mining. In Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learning, 2024. 6, 7

    2024

  41. [49]

    Restormer: Efficient transformer for high-resolution image restoration

    Syed Waqas Zamir, Aditya Arora, Salman Khan, Mu- nawar Hayat, Fahad Shahbaz Khan, and Ming-Hsuan Yang. Restormer: Efficient transformer for high-resolution image restoration. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022. 1, 2, 7

    2022

  42. [50]

    Learning deep cnn denoiser prior for image restoration

    Kai Zhang, Wangmeng Zuo, Shuhang Gu, and Lei Zhang. Learning deep cnn denoiser prior for image restoration. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2017. 6

    2017

  43. [51]

    Shufflenet: An extremely efficient convolutional neural net- work for mobile devices

    Xiangyu Zhang, Xinyu Zhou, Mengxiao Lin, and Jian Sun. Shufflenet: An extremely efficient convolutional neural net- work for mobile devices. In Proceedings of the IEEE Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2018. 3, 5

    2018

  44. [52]

    Image super-resolution using very deep residual channel attention networks

    Yulun Zhang, Kunpeng Li, Kai Li, Lichen Wang, Bineng Zhong, and Yun Fu. Image super-resolution using very deep residual channel attention networks. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, 2018. 1

    2018

  45. [53]

    Data-free knowledge dis- tillation for image super-resolution

    Yiman Zhang, Hanting Chen, Xinghao Chen, Yiping Deng, Chunjing Xu, and Yunhe Wang. Data-free knowledge dis- tillation for image super-resolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2021. 2

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.