Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

HumanRig: Learning Automatic Rigging for Humanoid Character in a Large Scale Dataset

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read HumanRig introduces a large-scale dataset of 11,434 AI-generated T-posed humanoid meshes and a data-driven rigging framework that predicts skeletons and skinning, outperforming prior rigging methods on both AI-generated and artist-created…

desk verdict HumanRig offers a genuinely useful dataset and coherent ablations, but the self-annotated ground truth and unavailable release make the headline performance claims provisional. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.02317 v1 pith:RXXCK3MS submitted 2024-12-03 cs.CV

Zedong Chu , Feng Xiong , Meiduo Liu , Jinzhi Zhang , Mingqi Shao , Zhaoxu Sun , Di Wang , Mu Xu This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords automaticrigginghumanoidcharactersskeletonconstructionskinningweights3DmeshdatasetpointtransformermutualattentionT-posemeshes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

HumanRig argues that automatic rigging of 3D humanoid characters has been held back by the absence of a large, consistently structured dataset, and supplies that dataset: 11,434 AI-generated T-posed meshes, all aligned to a standard 22-joint Mixamo skeleton. On top of it, the paper proposes a data-driven rigging framework that reads a front-view image to guess a coarse 3D skeleton, refines it with a point-transformer mesh encoder, and fuses skeleton and mesh features through mutual attention to predict both joint positions and skinning weights. The claim is that this two-stage design handles the messy, irregular topology of AI-generated meshes far better than GNN-based predecessors, and that training on this dataset also improves results on artist-created meshes. If correct, the work turns rigging from a manual bottleneck into a learnable step in the 3D content pipeline.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the Prior-Guided Skeleton Estimator plus the Mesh-Skeleton Mutual Attention Network: the PGSE projects 2D skeleton priors from a front view onto the mesh surface to obtain a coarse 3D skeleton, and the MSMAN uses cross-attention in both directions so skeleton features carry body-part semantics into mesh features while mesh features refine joint positions, enabling joint optimization of skeleton and skinning. The mesh encoder is a U-shaped Point Transformer that ignores edge connectivity, chosen because AI-generated meshes have irregular face topology.

What would settle it

Have independent professional riggers re-rig a random sample of the 11,434 meshes and compare their joint positions and skinning weights to the dataset's annotations; if the inter-rater discrepancy matches or exceeds the reported improvement of HumanRig over RigNet, the core gains are annotation artifacts rather than model quality.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a large dataset of AI-generated humanoid meshes with a uniform skeleton topology is sufficient to train an automatic rigging system that outperforms prior rigging methods on both skeleton construction and skinning. The system's skeleton estimator uses 2D joints from a front-view rendering, back-projected onto the mesh to form a coarse skeleton; mutual attention between skeleton and mesh features refines joints and guides skinning. On the HumanRig test set the complete model reports Chamfer-distance errors of 0.0027 (CD-J2J) and skinning precision 0.9271, and it also improves upon the RigNet-v1 baseline when evaluated on artist-created T-posed meshes.

Load-bearing premise

The ground-truth skeletons and skinning weights used for both training and evaluation are produced by the authors' own Mixamo-plus-manual-refinement pipeline, with no independent validation of their accuracy or consistency.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Rigging of AI-generated characters can be automated end-to-end, letting generated 3D assets be dropped into standard animation pipelines without manual joint placement.
  • Training on a diverse set of head-to-body ratios improves generalization; a model trained only on five-heads characters degrades when ratios deviate, while a balanced set gives stable performance across two- to nine-heads characters.
  • A point-based mesh encoder that ignores edges transfers better to irregular meshes than GNN encoders such as GraphSAGE, GraphTransformer, or GMEdgeNet in the reported comparisons.
  • The uniform Mixamo skeleton topology makes predicted rigs directly compatible with motion-capture data and game engines, enabling plug-and-play animation.
  • Joint skeleton-and-skinning optimization through mutual attention improves both outputs, since the coarse skeleton alone leaves skinning and joint refinement worse than the complete model.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the dataset is released and the annotation pipeline held to independent scrutiny, the same framework could be extended to hands and fingers by enriching the template skeleton and generating higher-resolution meshes, which the authors list as a limitation.
  • The 2D-prior idea suggests a testable extension: replacing the front-view render with multi-view renders could make the skeleton estimator robust to non-frontal poses or occluded characters beyond the T-pose setting.
  • Because the method outputs a fixed 22-joint skeleton, it implicitly defines a canonical correspondence between characters, which could support cross-character motion retargeting and shape interpolation without additional learning.
  • The dataset generation pipeline, which uses language prompts plus pose-conditioned image synthesis and image-to-3D conversion, is a reusable template for building rigged datasets for four-legged characters or generic objects, the extension the authors mention.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper introduces HumanRig, a dataset of 11,434 AI-generated T-posed humanoid meshes with a uniform 22-joint Mixamo skeleton topology, and proposes an automatic rigging framework combining a Prior-Guided Skeleton Estimator (PGSE), a U-shaped Point Transformer mesh encoder, and a Mesh-Skeleton Mutual Attention Network (MSMAN). The method is evaluated on skeleton construction, skinning prediction, and deformation quality, with ablations supporting the contributions of PGSE, MSMAN, and the point transformer encoder. The authors claim the first large-scale rigging dataset and state that the proposed method surpasses prior GNN-based approaches on both artist-created and AI-generated meshes.

Significance. If the dataset and annotations are trustworthy, HumanRig addresses a real bottleneck in automatic rigging research by providing a large-scale, topologically consistent corpus specifically targeting AI-generated humanoid meshes, a category ill-served by existing datasets such as RigNetv1 and SMPL. The proposed architecture is sensible, and the ablation study (Tables 3 and 4) provides credible internal evidence that the coarse-to-fine skeleton prior, the mutual attention module, and the edge-free point transformer encoder each contribute positively. The potential practical impact on animation pipelines is substantial. The main risk lies in the unvalidated annotation pipeline underlying both the dataset and the headline comparisons; the contribution is exactly as strong as the quality of the Mixamo-plus-manual-refinement labels, which are not independently assessed.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.2] The ground-truth skeletons and skinning weights are all produced by the authors' own Mixamo semi-automated rigging plus manual refinement pipeline, and the paper provides no independent validation of this annotation process. There is no inter-annotator agreement study, no error analysis, no comparison against an alternative rigging tool (e.g., Pinocchio, Auto-Rig, or a second commercial system), and no discussion of which types of characters were most difficult to annotate. Because every reported number in Tables 2–5 depends on these labels, any systematic bias in the pipeline (e.g., misplaced joints on unusual head-to-body ratios, artifacts in manual corrections, or inaccuracies in skinning for intricate accessories) is inherited by all claims. The paper should either supply an external validation study or explicitly frame the contribution as a method trained on this particular label distribution, with the caveat that its quality is unknown.
  2. [Section 5.1, Table 2] The cross-dataset comparison is potentially confounded by the fact that the RigNetv1-human test set is re-rigged with the same Mixamo-plus-manual-refinement pipeline used to generate the HumanRig labels. The conclusion that a model trained on HumanRig generalizes to artist-created meshes is weakened because both the RigNetv1-human labels and the HumanRig labels share the same annotation noise; a model that fits this label distribution may outperform a model trained on the original RigNetv1 labels for reasons unrelated to mesh style or dataset size. In addition, HumanRig-small and RigNetv1-human are matched only by sample count (1,729) and not by vertex count, topological complexity, or annotation difficulty, so the comparison is not a clean isolation of dataset scale or quality. The authors should provide a side-by-side comparison where RigNetv1-human is also evaluated with its original skeleton labels (where possible) and report vertex-count distributions for both datasets.
  3. [Section 5.3, Table 5] The quantitative comparison against prior methods is limited to deformation error on ten random poses. No quantitative skeleton-construction or skinning metrics are reported for RigNet or NBS, and the skeleton comparison in Figure 6 is purely qualitative. Since the paper's central claim is that the method 'surpasses previous methods in quality and versatility,' the evidence would be substantially stronger if the authors reported shared-metric comparisons (e.g., CD-J2J, skinning precision, L1) against RigNet and NBS on the same test sets, or clearly stated that such a comparison is impossible because those methods use different skeleton formats and therefore can only be compared through deformation quality.
  4. [Section 4.1] The PGSE module back-projects 2D joints into 3D by intersecting rays with the mesh surface and taking midpoints of first and last intersections. The robustness of this operation is not analyzed. For AI-generated meshes with open boundaries, self-intersections, or missing geometry (e.g., thin clothing accessories), ray-mesh intersection can produce spurious or degenerate points, and the paper does not describe how such failures are handled or filtered. Since PGSE is a load-bearing component (Table 3 shows a large drop without it), the paper should include a failure analysis of the ray-mesh step and clarify whether degenerate intersections are discarded, clamped, or otherwise processed.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract / Section 5.3] The paper does not provide a URL or release plan for the dataset or code, despite the dataset being a major contribution. A supplementary link or a statement of public availability should be added.
  2. [Equation (4)] The KL divergence notation in Eq. (4) uses 'Gskini,j' with a comma; for consistency with other subscripts it should be 'Gskin_{i,j}' or the summation indices should be formatted uniformly.
  3. [Section 5, Evaluation metrics] The metrics CD-J2J, CD-J2B, and CD-B2B are cited from [25], but the paper does not define them or explain how the two-sided Chamfer distance is computed for sets of skeleton joints. Since Table 2 reports very small values (e.g., 0.0027), the reader cannot assess whether these are normalized per-model or absolute distances. A brief definition would make the results interpretable.
  4. [Section 5, Evaluation metrics] The deformation error study uses '10 random poses with joint rotations within a range of ±10 degrees,' but no random seed or standard deviation is reported, so the run-to-run variability of the reported means is unknown.
  5. [Section 5.2, Mesh Encoder Design] The comparison in Table 4 replaces the mesh encoder with GraphSAGE, GraphTransformer, and GMEdgeNet, but the paper does not state whether these baselines are trained with the same skeleton-aware vertex features, the same training schedule, and the same loss weights. Without that detail, the reported differences could be due to training setup rather than architectural choice.
  6. [Figure 2] The data acquisition pipeline figure is referenced in Section 3 but not described in the caption; adding a short caption explaining each stage would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the shared annotation pipeline is a validation concern, not a reduction-by-construction.

full rationale

HumanRig is an empirical supervised-learning paper; there is no chain of equations whose conclusion equals an input by construction. The skeleton and skinning heads are trained with explicit losses (Eqs. 3-5) against ground-truth labels produced by a Mixamo-plus-manual pipeline (Sec 3.2). The 2D pose prior used by PGSE is indeed derived from those labels by projection (Sec 3.3), but the final skeleton is a network-refined estimate, and the ablations in Table 3 show the coarse prior alone is measurably worse than the full model (CD-J2J 0.0080 vs 0.0027), so the output is not the prior renamed as a prediction. The RigNetv1-human re-annotation in Sec 5.1 shares the same label-generation pipeline; that creates a possible distributional confound and a need for independent label validation, but it is not a case where the paper fits a parameter to a subset and 'predicts' the same quantity by construction. There is no invoked uniqueness theorem, and the only self-citation, [27], appears in a list of five references supporting a general statement about 3D generation progress and is not load-bearing. Consequently no circular step meets the standard of quoting an explicit reduction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central contributions are an annotated dataset and a learned system; no theoretical derivation with hidden constants is present. The main assumptions are about annotation quality, skeleton template adequacy, and the reliability of the 2D pose prior and ray intersection for coarse skeleton initialization.

free parameters (2)
  • Mixamo 22-joint skeleton template = 22 joints
    Chosen by hand as the universal skeleton topology for all meshes; excludes fingers and toes as acknowledged in Section 6, and assumes one template fits cartoon, animal, and humanoid shapes.
  • Loss weights for skeleton and skinning = 1 and 1
    Ltotal = Lskinning + Lskeleton in Eq. (5) uses equal weights without tuning or sensitivity analysis.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Ground-truth rigging produced by Mixamo semi-automated rigging plus manual artist refinement is accurate enough to train and evaluate automatic rigging.
    Invoked throughout Section 3.2 and used as supervision in Eq. (3) and Eq. (4); the paper provides no inter-annotator or error analysis for these labels.
  • domain assumption A single 22-joint Mixamo skeleton can parameterize all humanoid characters in the dataset, including cartoon characters and humanoid animals.
    Section 3.2 and limitations in Section 6 state fingers are omitted; the fixed topology is a precondition for the uniform-skeleton claim.
  • domain assumption For every mesh, the front-view render and ray-mesh intersection produce a correct initial coarse skeleton.
    PGSE in Section 4.1 back-projects 2D joints along rays and takes midpoints of first and last intersections; this requires clean front views and meshes without severe self-occlusion or holes.
  • domain assumption The 2D pose estimator (RTMPose) generalizes from its training images to held-out HumanRig front views and to RigNetv1 meshes.
    Used in Section 4.1; no separate evaluation of 2D pose accuracy on the rigging test sets is reported.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of HumanRig: Learning Automatic Rigging for Humanoid Character in a Large Scale Dataset." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RXXCK3MS

@misc{pith2026241202317,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: HumanRig: Learning Automatic Rigging for Humanoid Character in a Large Scale Dataset},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RXXCK3MS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.02317}
}
read the original abstract

With the rapid evolution of 3D generation algorithms, the cost of producing 3D humanoid character models has plummeted, yet the field is impeded by the lack of a comprehensive dataset for automatic rigging, which is a pivotal step in character animation. Addressing this gap, we present HumanRig, the first large-scale dataset specifically designed for 3D humanoid character rigging, encompassing 11,434 meticulously curated T-posed meshes adhered to a uniform skeleton topology. Capitalizing on this dataset, we introduce an innovative, data-driven automatic rigging framework, which overcomes the limitations of GNN-based methods in handling complex AI-generated meshes. Our approach integrates a Prior-Guided Skeleton Estimator (PGSE) module, which uses 2D skeleton joints to provide a preliminary 3D skeleton, and a Mesh-Skeleton Mutual Attention Network (MSMAN) that fuses skeleton features with 3D mesh features extracted by a U-shaped point transformer. This enables a coarse-to-fine 3D skeleton joint regression and a robust skinning estimation, surpassing previous methods in quality and versatility. This work not only remedies the dataset deficiency in rigging research but also propels the animation industry towards more efficient and automated character rigging pipelines.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.02317 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The AI-generated mesh and the artist-created one show [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Data Acquisition Pipeline for our HumanRig dataset. Dataset # Uniform Skel Clothing Hair Bind Pose Source Mixamo [3] 108 ✓ ✓ ✓ T-pose artist-created SMPL [13] N/A ✓ ✕ ✕ T-pose artist-created RigNetv1 [25] 1729 ✕ ✓ ✓ T-pose artist-created HumanRig (ours) 11434 ✓ ✓ ✓ T-pose AI-generated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Head-to-body Ratio Diversity Statistics of HumanRig. a result, we can produce a broad range of diverse and pre￾cisely posed T-pose humanoid character images, covering various head-to-body ratios. T-pose Mesh Generation. The swift progress in 3D generation has enabled the rapid production of large-scale and high-quality 3D meshes with unprecedented speed. We utilize an Image-to-3D pipeline for generating 3D meshes, w… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Method Overview. Given a humanoid mesh, a coarse skeleton is predicted by an Prior-guided skeleton estimator (PGSE) and helps construct the skeleton-aware vertex features. They are fed into Skeleton Encoder and Mesh Encoder, respectively, then fused by a Mesh-Skeleton …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Study on the Importance of Diversity in Body Shapes. to match the size of HumanRig5. We train two Human￾Rig models separately on HumanRig5 and HumanRigu, and then evaluate them on test subsets ranging from two-heads to nine-heads. The experimental results in [PITH_FUL…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Skeleton construction comparisons. RigNet outputs irregular skeletons, which presents challenges to motion applications. NBS performs poorly in joint position prediction. Our method achieves the most plausible humanoid skeletons according to different human shapes from…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Skinning and Deformation Comparisons. Different colors are assigned to each vertex according to the most influential joint, determined by skinning weights. Previous methods struggle with meshes that have special body shapes or intricate accessories (red box), while our…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. One Model to Rig Them All: Diverse Skeleton Rigging with UniRig

    cs.GR 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    UniRig generates topologically valid skeleton trees and skinning weights for diverse 3D meshes with an autoregressive transformer, a tree tokenization scheme, and a bone-point cross attention, trained on the new Rig-X...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Automatic rigging and anima- tion of 3d characters

    Ilya Baran and Jovan Popovi´c. Automatic rigging and anima- tion of 3d characters. ACM Transactions on graphics (TOG), 26(3):72–es, 2007. 2, 7

    work page 2007

  2. [2]

    Multi-garment net: Learning to dress 3d people from images

    Bharat Lal Bhatnagar, Garvita Tiwari, Christian Theobalt, and Gerard Pons-Moll. Multi-garment net: Learning to dress 3d people from images. InIEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). IEEE, 2019. 2

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    Rigging with mixamo

    Sue Blackman and Sue Blackman. Rigging with mixamo. Unity for Absolute Beginners, pages 565–573, 2014. 3

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    Openmmlab pose estimation tool- box and benchmark

    MMPose Contributors. Openmmlab pose estimation tool- box and benchmark. https://github.com/open- mmlab/mmpose, 2020. 5

    2020

  5. [5]

    Geodesic binding for degenerate character geometry using sparse voxelization

    Olivier Dionne and Martin De Lasa. Geodesic binding for degenerate character geometry using sparse voxelization. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics , 20(10):1367–1378, 2014. 7

    work page 2014

  6. [6]

    Inductive representation learning on large graphs

    Will Hamilton, Zhitao Ying, and Jure Leskovec. Inductive representation learning on large graphs. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017. 6, 7

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    Meshcnn: a network with an edge

    Rana Hanocka, Amir Hertz, Noa Fish, Raja Giryes, Shachar Fleishman, and Daniel Cohen-Or. Meshcnn: a network with an edge. ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG), 38(4):1–12,

    work page

  8. [8]

    Bounded biharmonic weights for real-time deformation

    Alec Jacobson, Ilya Baran, Jovan Popovic, and Olga Sorkine. Bounded biharmonic weights for real-time deformation. ACM Trans. Graph., 30(4):78, 2011. 2

    work page 2011

Show all 30 references
  1. [9]

    Rtmpose: Real- time multi-person pose estimation based on mmpose

    Tao Jiang, Peng Lu, Li Zhang, Ningsheng Ma, Rui Han, Chengqi Lyu, Yining Li, and Kai Chen. Rtmpose: Real- time multi-person pose estimation based on mmpose. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.07399, 2023. 4, 5

    2023 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Elasticity-inspired de- formers for character articulation

    Ladislav Kavan and Olga Sorkine. Elasticity-inspired de- formers for character articulation. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 31(6):1–8, 2012. 2

    2012

  3. [11]

    Learning skeletal ar- ticulations with neural blend shapes

    Peizhuo Li, Kfir Aberman, Rana Hanocka, Libin Liu, Olga Sorkine-Hornung, and Baoquan Chen. Learning skeletal ar- ticulations with neural blend shapes. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 40(4):1–15, 2021. 2, 7

    2021

  4. [12]

    Neuroskinning: Automatic skin binding for production characters with deep graph networks

    Lijuan Liu, Youyi Zheng, Di Tang, Yi Yuan, Changjie Fan, and Kun Zhou. Neuroskinning: Automatic skin binding for production characters with deep graph networks. ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG), 38(4):1–12, 2019. 2, 5, 7

    2019

  5. [13]

    Smpl: A skinned multi- person linear model

    Matthew Loper, Naureen Mahmood, Javier Romero, Gerard Pons-Moll, and Michael J Black. Smpl: A skinned multi- person linear model. Acm Transactions on Graphics , 34 (Article 248), 2015. 2, 3, 7

    2015

  6. [14]

    Decoupled weight decay regularization

    I Loshchilov. Decoupled weight decay regularization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101, 2017. 5

    2017 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Tarig: Adaptive template- aware neural rigging for humanoid characters

    Jing Ma and Dongliang Zhang. Tarig: Adaptive template- aware neural rigging for humanoid characters. Computers & Graphics, 114:158–167, 2023. 2, 7

    2023

  8. [16]

    Skin- ningnet: Two-stream graph convolutional neural network for skinning prediction of synthetic characters

    Albert Mosella-Montoro and Javier Ruiz-Hidalgo. Skin- ningnet: Two-stream graph convolutional neural network for skinning prediction of synthetic characters. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pat- tern Recognition, pages 18593–18602, 2022. 5

    2022

  9. [17]

    Heterskinnet: A heterogeneous network for skin weights pre- diction

    Xiaoyu Pan, Jiancong Huang, Jiaming Mai, He Wang, Honglin Li, Tongkui Su, Wenjun Wang, and Xiaogang Jin. Heterskinnet: A heterogeneous network for skin weights pre- diction. In Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques. Association for Computing Ma...

    2021

  10. [18]

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models

    Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Bj ¨orn Ommer. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 10684–10695, 2022. 3

    2022

  11. [19]

    Masked label prediction: Uni- fied message passing model for semi-supervised classifica- tion

    Yunsheng Shi, Zhengjie Huang, Shikun Feng, Hui Zhong, Wenjin Wang, and Yu Sun. Masked label prediction: Uni- fied message passing model for semi-supervised classifica- tion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.03509, 2020. 6, 7

    2009 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Triposr: Fast 3d object reconstruction from a single image

    Dmitry Tochilkin, David Pankratz, Zexiang Liu, Zixuan Huang, Adam Letts, Yangguang Li, Ding Liang, Christian Laforte, Varun Jampani, and Yan-Pei Cao. Triposr: Fast 3d object reconstruction from a single image. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.02151, 2024. 1, 3

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Dynamic graph cnn for learning on point clouds

    Yue Wang, Yongbin Sun, Ziwei Liu, Sanjay E Sarma, Michael M Bronstein, and Justin M Solomon. Dynamic graph cnn for learning on point clouds. ACM Transactions on Graphics (tog), 38(5):1–12, 2019. 2, 7

    2019

  14. [22]

    Bone glow: An improved method for the assignment of weights for mesh deforma- tion

    Rich Wareham and Joan Lasenby. Bone glow: An improved method for the assignment of weights for mesh deforma- tion. In Articulated Motion and Deformable Objects: 5th In- ternational Conference, AMDO 2008, Port d’Andratx, Mal- lorca, Spain, July 9-11, 2008. Proceedings 5 , pages...

    2008

  15. [23]

    Unique3d: High-quality and efficient 3d mesh generation from a single image

    Kailu Wu, Fangfu Liu, Zhihan Cai, Runjie Yan, Hanyang Wang, Yating Hu, Yueqi Duan, and Kaisheng Ma. Unique3d: High-quality and efficient 3d mesh generation from a single image. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.20343, 2024. 1, 3

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Instantmesh: Efficient 3d mesh generation from a single image with sparse-view large reconstruction models

    Jiale Xu, Weihao Cheng, Yiming Gao, Xintao Wang, Shenghua Gao, and Ying Shan. Instantmesh: Efficient 3d mesh generation from a single image with sparse-view large reconstruction models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.07191 ,

    arXiv

  17. [25]

    Rignet: neural rigging for articu- lated characters

    Zhan Xu, Yang Zhou, Evangelos Kalogerakis, Chris Lan- dreth, and Karan Singh. Rignet: neural rigging for articu- lated characters. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 39 (4):58–1, 2020. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7

    2020

  18. [26]

    Effec- tive whole-body pose estimation with two-stages distillation

    Zhendong Yang, Ailing Zeng, Chun Yuan, and Yu Li. Effec- tive whole-body pose estimation with two-stages distillation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 4210–4220, 2023. 3

    2023

  19. [27]

    G3PT: unleash the power of autoregressive modeling in 3d generation via cross- scale querying transformer

    Jinzhi Zhang, Feng Xiong, and Mu Xu. G3PT: unleash the power of autoregressive modeling in 3d generation via cross- scale querying transformer. CoRR, abs/2409.06322, 2024. 1

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models

    Lvmin Zhang, Anyi Rao, and Maneesh Agrawala. Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 3836–3847, 2023. 3

    2023

  21. [29]

    Clay: A controllable large-scale generative model for creat- 9 ing high-quality 3d assets

    Longwen Zhang, Ziyu Wang, Qixuan Zhang, Qiwei Qiu, Anqi Pang, Haoran Jiang, Wei Yang, Lan Xu, and Jingyi Yu. Clay: A controllable large-scale generative model for creat- 9 ing high-quality 3d assets. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 43(4):1–20, 2024. 1, 3

    2024

  22. [30]

    Point transformer

    Hengshuang Zhao, Li Jiang, Jiaya Jia, Philip HS Torr, and Vladlen Koltun. Point transformer. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 16259–16268, 2021. 2, 5 10

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.