Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 94 references

Nonequilibrium steady state of Brownian motion in an intermittent potential

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In the fast-switching limit, a trapped Brownian particle's far tails become universal exponentials.

desk verdict Plausible general large-deviation formalism for intermittent traps, with a real heuristic gap that needs numerical checking before the universal tail and DPT are taken as settled. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.03045 v2 pith:FOKQLDUG submitted 2024-12-04 cond-mat.stat-mech

Soheli Mukherjee , Naftali R. Smith This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mech MSC 60F1082C31
keywords intermittentpotentialBrownianmotionlargedeviationsnonequilibriumsteadystatefirst-passagetimedynamicalphasetransitionoptimalfluctuationmethoduniversalexponentialtail
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper derives the steady-state distribution of a Brownian particle trapped by a potential that switches on and off at rate γ, in the rapid-switching limit γ→∞. Typical positions follow an effective Boltzmann law with half the original potential, but the tails deviate sharply: for large |X| the distribution decays as exp(−√(γ/D)|X−x0|), independent of the trap shape. The authors give a general formula for the full large-deviation function S(X) = ∫_{x0}^{X} k dx with k fixed by a cubic equation, from which mean first-passage times follow as ~ $e^{{S(X)}}$. For periodic one-dimensional potentials they find a first-order dynamical phase transition in the log of the steady-state distribution, in the absence of any external drift. These results matter because they show that intermittency itself, not just active driving or resetting, can produce universal nonequilibrium tails and symmetry-breaking transitions.

What carries the argument

The engine is a coarse-grained large-deviation action. Over windows much longer than 1/γ but shorter than the trap relaxation time, the force F(x) is treated as constant, and the long-time rate function Ψ_f(v) for a particle driven by constant force f plus telegraphic and white noise is Legendre-transformed into the scaled cumulant generating function λ_f(k). The action S=∫ Ψ_{F(x)}(ẋ)dt is minimized; since the effective Hamiltonian H(x,k)=λ_{F(x)}(k) is conserved and the path starts at rest at x0, H=0, reducing the minimization to a quadrature S(X)=∫ k dx with k the root of λ_{F(x)}(k)=0. The root is expressed through a universal scaling function Ω(w) solving the cubic Ω³+wΩ²−2Ω−w=0. This object converts the potential's force profile into the steady-state distribution and the optimal (most likely) trajectory.

What would settle it

Numerically integrate the Langevin equation (1) for a smooth single-minimum potential not solvable exactly, e.g. U(x)=$x^{4}$/4, at a large fixed γ, measure log P_SSD(X) for |X|≫√(D/γ), and check that the slope equals √(γ/D) and that S(X) from Eqs. (22)-(25) matches the histogram over the full range; any systematic deviation, or a dependence of the far-tail slope on the trap strength, would falsify the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central result is that in the limit γ→∞ the steady-state distribution obeys P_SSD(X) ~ $e^{{−S(X)}}$, where S(X)=∫_{x0}^{X} k dx and k is the solution of λ_{F(x)}(k)=0 with λ_f(k)=fk/2+√(f²k²/4+γ²)−γ+Dk². Near the potential minimum this reproduces the effective Boltzmann distribution U(X)/2D; as |X|→∞ the action grows as √(γ/D)|X−x0|, so the far tail is universal and equals, to leading order, the tail for Brownian motion with instantaneous resets to x0 at rate γ. The same action controls the mean first-passage time, T ~ $e^{{S(X)}}$. For a harmonic trap the paper obtains the closed-form scaled cumulant generating function Λ̃(k)=k²/2 − ½ ln(1−k²), matching an exact Fourier-space calculation. In one-dimensional periodic potentials, the need to choose between two paths to reach X produces a corner in S(X), interpreted as a first-order dynamical phase transition, together with a nonzero steady-state current that vanishes at γ→∞.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation treats the external force as locally constant on time windows much longer than 1/γ but shorter than the relaxation time, and treats noise increments in different windows as independent; if the potential changes appreciably within one switching time, the action ∫Ψ dt is not the true rate function and the universal tail could fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any smooth single-minimum confining potential, the full steady-state distribution and mean first-passage time in the rapid-switching limit are given by the quadrature S(X); no further assumptions about the potential shape are needed.
  • The far-tail exponent √(γ/D) is universal: a deeper or steeper trap changes only where the universal tail sets in, not its slope, and the optimal escape path is the same as for instantaneous resetting.
  • Mean first-passage times to a distant target deviate strongly from the Arrhenius law based on the effective potential, being exponentially smaller than the effective-equilibrium estimate.
  • For periodic potentials, the log-steady-state distribution develops a corner at a critical X_c; the paper's example shows X_c=5.365... for U=cos x + (1/4) sin 2x, marking a first-order dynamical phase transition without external drift.
  • The steady-state probability current is exponentially suppressed as e^{−S1}−e^{−S2}, differing by many orders of magnitude between the two directions, which could separate particles by trap parameters.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The universal tail suggests an experimental fingerprint: in an optical trap whose intensity is toggled at rate γ, escape statistics at large displacement should be tunable by γ and D alone, independent of the trap's stiffness; this is directly testable with current tweezers.
  • The dynamical phase transition arises from competing saddle paths (two spatial routes), so analogous first-order transitions should appear in higher-dimensional central potentials once rotational symmetry is broken, where infinitely many paths compete.
  • The coincidence with resetting Brownian motion in the far tail may extend to time-integrated observables: escape-rate statistics and occupation-time large deviations of the intermittent-trap process may match the resetting process in the same universal regime.
  • The method, being variational, can be applied to double-well or multi-well potentials, where the action is a global minimum over multiple saddle paths; this could produce multiple dynamical phase transitions and hysteresis-like switching between optimal paths as parameters change.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies the steady state distribution of a Brownian particle in an intermittent confining potential in the rapid-switching limit γ→∞. Using a coarse-grained dynamics based on the temporal additivity principle (Eq. 11) and the optimal fluctuation method, the authors derive an action S(X)=∫ k dx (Eq. 22) with λ_{F(x)}(k)=0 (Eq. 19), yielding P_SSD(X)∼e^{-S(X)} (Eq. 27). They show typical fluctuations follow the effective Boltzmann distribution U/2D, while the far tails are universal, P_SSD∼exp(-√(γ/D)|X-x0|) (Eq. 29), independent of U(X). For harmonic potentials they reproduce and extend the exact result of Ref. [5] (Appendix B), and for periodic potentials they predict a first-order dynamical phase transition at X_c and a nonzero steady-state current.

Significance. If the derived formulas are correct, the paper provides a parameter-free large-deviation description of a nontrivial nonequilibrium steady state, with a clean universal exponential tail that matches the known resetting result, and a new prediction of a first-order DPT in the absence of drift. The explicit check against the exact harmonic solution (Appendix B) is a genuine strength, as is the transparent physical identification of the optimal coarse-grained path and noise realizations (Eqs. 34, 42). The main limitation is that the central coarse-graining step is a heuristic, not a controlled approximation; the paper would be substantially strengthened by a quantitative error estimate or a non-harmonic numerical benchmark.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III A, Eq. (11)] The temporal additivity principle is the load-bearing step: it approximates the probability of a coarse-grained path by exp[-∫Ψ_{F(x)}(\dot x) dt], treating F as constant in windows longer than 1/γ and noise increments as independent across windows. The paper does not provide an estimate of the corrections from spatial variation of F across a window, which on the optimal path are of order F'(x)Δx with Δx∼√(D/γ) (and can grow with x for non-harmonic potentials), nor of correlations between windows. Because the action S(X) in Eqs. (22)-(27) determines the SSD, the universal tail (29), the MFPT, and the DPT location X_c (Eq. 61), this uncontrolled step can in principle change the leading-order result. The harmonic benchmark (Appendix B) has linearly growing force with constant slope, so it cannot detect these corrections. I recommend adding a direct numerical test for a non-harmonic potential (e.g., U(x)=x²/2+x⁴/4) or a perturbative estimate of the leading correction to S(X).
  2. [Sec. V, Eq. (61)] The dynamical phase transition is derived by minimizing over two competing paths, using the same action that relies on the temporal additivity approximation. The limit is taken as γ→∞, D→0 with γD fixed, and the optimal-fluctuation evaluation is assumed to give the leading exponential asymptotics uniformly in X. No argument is given that the neglected corrections are small uniformly in X across the critical point X_c, where the two path actions cross. Since the DPT is a non-analytic feature of the LDF, a small correction near X_c could shift or round the transition. Please provide an estimate of the corrections or a numerical verification for the example (60) showing that the predicted kink at X_c=5.365... is robust.
  3. [Sec. VI and Abstract] The statement that the MFPT to reach X is ∼1/P_SSD(X) in leading order is asserted without derivation. For a general Markov process this relation is not exact and requires a separate large-deviation argument (e.g., via the splitting probability or the renewal structure). Since the abstract presents this as a central result, a derivation or a reference to a theorem would strengthen the paper. The known resetting result [1] supports the universal tail but not the general intermittent potential case.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III B] There is a typo: "and the the MFPT" should read "and the MFPT".
  2. [Eq. (24)] The cubic root formula for Ω(w) uses a complex branch and the principal cube root, but Ω(w) is real for real w; a brief note to that effect would improve readability.
  3. [Sec. IV, Fig. 1] In Fig. 1(b), the asymptotic form for |k|→1 is written as 1/2 − (1/2)ln(1−|k|); including the subleading constant 1/2 ln 2 in the main text would help readers reproduce the plot.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the SSD is derived from an exact constant-force SCGF via a saddle-point calculation and validated against independent exact harmonic and resetting benchmarks; the sole inherited heuristic (temporal additivity) is an approximation, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The derivation of P_SSD(X) ~ exp[-S(X)] is self-contained: the only dynamical input is the exact constant-force SCGF lambda_f(k) (Eq. 8, re-derived in Appendix A from the cumulants of the telegraphic and white noises), and the extension to position-dependent force in Eq. (11) is an explicitly stated coarse-graining approximation rather than a hidden restatement of the result. The Hamiltonian/saddle-point step (Eqs. 16-27) introduces no fitted parameter and no quantity defined in terms of P_SSD(X). Appendix B compares the predicted harmonic SCGF (Eq. 48) with the independent exact result of Ref. [5] and finds agreement, so the central claim is not forced by self-citation. The universal tail exponent sqrt(gamma/D) follows from the asymptotic solution of Eq. (23) for strongly confining potentials and is only subsequently compared with the independent resetting result of Ref. [1]; it is a consequence, not an input. The temporal-additivity principle is cited partly to the authors' own Refs. [49,50], but it is also supported by external references [53-61] and benchmarked against an external exact solution; it is a heuristic, not a circular reduction. The conclusion's phrase 'derived exact results' overstates the controlled status of the Eq. (11) approximation, but that is a correctness/validity risk, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted; all parameters are D, gamma, and the given potential. The calculation rests on standard large-deviation principles, plus domain assumptions about timescale separation, confining and central potentials, and the periodic-path minimization. The main extra assumption is temporal additivity; the DPT section adds the downhill-vanishing-action assumption.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Large deviation principle for the long-time position of a constant-force process (Donsker-Varadhan theory).
    Used to derive the SCGF lambda_f(k), Eqs. (7)-(10); standard mathematical background in large deviations.
  • domain assumption Temporal additivity: force F(x) is approximated as constant within coarse-graining windows much longer than 1/gamma yet shorter than the relaxation time, and noise increments in different windows are independent.
    Central modeling step in Sec. III A, Eq. (11); not rigorously controlled for arbitrary potentials; inherited from Refs. [49,50].
  • domain assumption The potential U(x) is smooth, has a unique global minimum, and is strongly confining (F goes to -infinity as x goes to +infinity); for d>1, U is central.
    Needed for the boundary conditions x(-infinity)=x0, for the existence of the far-tail limit, and for the radial reduction in Sec. III C.
  • domain assumption Periodic case: only two minimal paths to X are considered, and the segment over the maximum and down to X has vanishing action.
    Used in Sec. V, Eqs. (57)-(59); the downhill segment is omitted without a detailed derivation, standard in instanton arguments but not proven here.
  • domain assumption Mean first-passage time T is proportional to 1/P_SSD(X) to leading order.
    Stated in Sec. III B after Eq. (27), quoted from prior large-deviation intuition; not derived in this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nonequilibrium steady state of Brownian motion in an intermittent potential." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FOKQLDUG

@misc{pith2026241203045,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nonequilibrium steady state of Brownian motion in an intermittent potential},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FOKQLDUG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.03045}
}
abstract

We calculate the steady state distribution $P_{\text{SSD}}(\boldsymbol{X})$ of the position of a Brownian particle under an intermittent confining potential that switches on and off with a constant rate $\gamma$. We assume the external potential $U(\boldsymbol{x})$ to be smooth and have a unique global minimum at $\boldsymbol{x} = \boldsymbol{x}_0$, and in dimension $d>1$ we additionally assume that $U(\boldsymbol{x})$ is central. We focus on the rapid-switching limit $\gamma \to \infty$. Typical fluctuations follow a Boltzmann distribution $P_{\text{SSD}}(\boldsymbol{X}) \sim e^{- U_{\text{eff}}(\boldsymbol{X}) / D}$, with an effective potential $U_{\text{eff}}(\boldsymbol{X}) = U(\boldsymbol{X})/2$, where $D$ is the diffusion coefficient. However, we also calculate the tails of $P_{\text{SSD}}(\boldsymbol{X})$ which behave very differently. In the far tails $|\boldsymbol{X}| \to \infty$, a universal behavior $P_{\text{SSD}}\left(\boldsymbol{X}\right)\sim e^{-\sqrt{\gamma/D} \, \left|\boldsymbol{X}-\boldsymbol{x}_{0}\right|}$ emerges, that is independent of the trapping potential. The mean first-passage time to reach position $\boldsymbol{X}$ is given, in the leading order, by $\sim 1/P_{\text{SSD}}(\boldsymbol{X})$. This coincides with the Arrhenius law (for the effective potential $U_{\text{eff}}$) for $\boldsymbol{X} \simeq \boldsymbol{x}_0$, but deviates from it elsewhere. We give explicit results for the harmonic potential. Finally, we extend our results to periodic one-dimensional systems. Here we find that in the limit of $\gamma \to \infty$ and $D \to 0$, the logarithm of $P_{\text{SSD}}(X)$ exhibits a singularity which we interpret as a first-order dynamical phase transition (DPT). This DPT occurs in absence of any external drift. We also calculate the nonzero probability current in the steady state that is a result of the nonequilibrium nature of the system.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.03045 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. shows the plot of the action S(Y ) and the SCGF Λ( ˜ ˜k), together with their asymptotic behaviors. We now calculate the optimal (most likely) coarse-grained trajectory and optimal realization of the noises of the system conditioned on a given value of X (as shown in Sec. III B) for harmonic potential. We use the rescaled optimal trajectory y(t) = x(t)/ √γ, Y = X/√γ and rescaled noise ˜ξ(t) = ξ(t)/ √γ along with the… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) and (c) show the plots for the typical fluctuation regime (here Y = 0.5). Similarly, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages

  1. [5]

    Santra, S

    I. Santra, S. Das and S. K. Nath,Brownian motion under intermittent harmonic potentials, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.54 334001 (2021)

    2021

  2. [1]

    M. R. Evans and S. N. Majumdar,Diffusion with Stochastic Resetting, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 160601 (2011)

    2011

  3. [2]

    Besga, A

    B. Besga, A. Bovon, A. Petrosyan, S. N. Majumdar and S. Ciliberto,Optimal mean first-passage time for a Brownian searcher subjected to resetting: Experimental and theoretical results, Phys. Rev. R2, 032029, (2020)

    2020

  4. [3]

    Tal-Friedman, A

    O. Tal-Friedman, A. Pal, A. Sekhon, S. Reuveni and Y. Roichman,Experimental Realization of Diffusion with Stochastic Resetting, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.11 7350-7355, (2020)

    2020

  5. [4]

    Mercado-Vásquez, D

    G. Mercado-Vásquez, D. Boyer, S. N. Majumdar and G. Schehr,Intermittent resetting potentials, J. Stat. Mech.2020, 113203, (2020)

    2020

  6. [6]

    Pal and A

    D.Gupta, A. Pal and A. Kundu,Resetting with stochastic return through linear confining potential, J. Stat. Mech.2021, 043202, (2021)

    2021

  7. [7]

    A Plata, A

    D.Gupta, C. A Plata, A. Kundu and A. Pal,Stochastic resetting with stochastic returns using external trap, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 54, 025003, (2021)

    2021

  8. [8]

    Mercado-Vásquez, D

    G. Mercado-Vásquez, D. Boyer and S. N. Majumdar,Reducing mean first passage times with intermittent confining poten- tials: a realization of resetting processes, J. Stat. Mech. (2022) 093202

    2022

Show all 94 references
  1. [9]

    Gupta and C

    D. Gupta and C. A Plata,Work fluctuations for diffusion dynamics submitted to stochastic return, New J. Phys.24 113034, (2022)

    2022

  2. [10]

    Alston, L

    H. Alston, L. Cocconi and T. BertrandNon-equilibrium thermodynamics of diffusion in fluctuating potentials, J. Phys. A. Math. Theor. 55, 274004 (2022)

    2022

  3. [11]

    Kulkarni, S

    M, Biroli, M. Kulkarni, S. N. Majumdar, G. Schehr,Dynamically emergent correlations between particles in a switching harmonic trap, Phys. Rev. E109, L032106 (2024)

    2024

  4. [12]

    M. R. Evans and S. N. Majumdar,Effects of refractory period on stochastic resetting, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.52, 01LT01, (2018)

    2018

  5. [13]

    FrydelStatistical mechanics of passive Brownian particles in a fluctuating harmonic trap, Phys

    D. FrydelStatistical mechanics of passive Brownian particles in a fluctuating harmonic trap, Phys. Rev. E110, 024613 (2024)

    2024

  6. [14]

    S. C. Takatori, R. De Dier, J. Vermant, and J. F. Brady,Acoustic trapping of active matter, Nat. Commun. 7, 10694 (2016). 17

    2016

  7. [15]

    Goerlich, M

    R. Goerlich, M. Li, S. Albert, G. Manfredi, P. Hervieux, and C. Genet,Noise and ergodic properties of Brownian motion in an optical tweezer: Looking at regime crossovers in an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process, Phys. Rev. E103, 032132 (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    Buttinoni, L

    I. Buttinoni, L. Caprini, L. Alvarez , F. J. Schwarzendahl, and H. Löwen,Active colloids in harmonic optical potentials, Europhys. Lett. 140, 27001 (2022)

    2022

  9. [17]

    Goerlich, L.B

    R. Goerlich, L.B. Pires, G. Manfredi, P.A. Hervieux, C. Genet,Harvesting information to control nonequilibrium states of active matter, Phys. Rev. E106, 054617, (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    Dembo, O

    A. Dembo, O. Zeitouni.Large Deviations Techniques and Applications. Springer, New York, 2nd edition (1998)

    1998

  11. [19]

    den Hollander.Large Deviations

    F. den Hollander.Large Deviations. Fields Institute Monograph, AMS, Providence (2000)

    2000

  12. [20]

    Touchette,The large deviation approach to statistical mechanics, Phys

    H. Touchette,The large deviation approach to statistical mechanics, Phys. Rep.478, 3 (2009)

    2009

  13. [21]

    Touchette,Introduction to dynamical large deviations of Markov processes.Physica A 504, 5 (2018)

    H. Touchette,Introduction to dynamical large deviations of Markov processes.Physica A 504, 5 (2018)

    2018

  14. [22]

    Baek and Y

    Y. Baek and Y. Kafri,Singularities in large deviation functions, J. Stat. Mech. (2015) P08026

    2015

  15. [23]

    Zarfaty, B

    L. Zarfaty, B. Meerson,Statistics of large currents in the Kipnis-Marchioro-Presutti model in a ring geometry, J. Stat. Mech. (2016) 033304

    2016

  16. [24]

    O.ShpielbergandE.Akkermans, Le Chatelier Principle for Out-of-Equilibrium and Boundary-Driven Systems: Application to Dynamical Phase Transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 240603 (2016)

    2016

  17. [25]

    Y. Baek, Y. Kafri, and V. Lecomte,Dynamical Symmetry Breaking and Phase Transitions in Driven Diffusive Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 030604 (2017)

    2017

  18. [26]

    Y. Baek, Y. Kafri, and V. Lecomte,Dynamical phase transitions in the current distribution of driven diffusive channels, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.51, 10500 (2018)

    2018

  19. [27]

    N. R. Smith, B. Meerson and P. V. Sasorov,Finite-size effects in the short-time height distribution of the Kardar-Parisi- Zhang equation, J. Stat. Mech. (2018) 023202

    2018

  20. [28]

    Asida, E

    T. Asida, E. Livne, and B. Meerson,Large fluctuations of a Kardar-Parisi-Zhang interface on a half line: The height statistics at a shifted point, Phys. Rev. E99, 042132 (2019)

    2019

  21. [29]

    Agranov, P

    T. Agranov, P. Zilber, N. R. Smith, T. Admon, Y. Roichman, B. Meerson,The Airy distribution: experiment, large deviations and additional statistics, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 013174 (2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    N. R. Smith,Large deviations in chaotic systems: Exact results and dynamical phase transition, Phys. Rev. E106, L042202 (2022)

    2022

  23. [31]

    Agranov, M

    T. Agranov, M. E. Cates, R. L. Jack,Entropy production and its large deviations in an active lattice gas, J. Stat. Mech. (2022) 123201

    2022

  24. [32]

    Schorlepp, T

    T. Schorlepp, T. Grafke and R. Grauer,Symmetries and Zero Modes in Sample Path Large Deviations, J. Stat. Phys.190, 50 (2023)

    2023

  25. [33]

    Agranov, M

    T. Agranov, M. E. Cates, R. L. Jack,Tricritical behavior in dynamical phase transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 017102 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    Schorlepp, P

    T. Schorlepp, P. Sasorov, B. Meerson,Short-time large deviations of the spatially averaged height of a KPZ interface on a ring, J. Stat. Mech. (2023) 123202

    2023

  27. [35]

    Mukherjee, P

    S. Mukherjee, P. Le Doussal, and N. R. Smith,Large deviations in statistics of the local time and occupation time for a run and tumble particle, Phys. Rev. E110, 024107 (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    Schorlepp, O

    T. Schorlepp, O. Shpielberg,Systematic analysis of critical exponents in continuous dynamical phase transitions of weak noise theories, arXiv:2410.16043

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    Onsager and S

    L. Onsager and S. Machlup,Fluctuations and Irreversible Processes, Phys. Rev.91, 1505 (1953)

    1953

  30. [38]

    P. C. Martin, E. D. Siggia, and H. A. Rose,Statistical Dynamics of Classical Systems, Phys. Rev. A8, 423 (1973)

    1973

  31. [39]

    M. I. Freidlin and A. D. Wentzell,Random Perturbations of Dynamical SystemsSpringer, New York, (1984)

    1984

  32. [40]

    Soviet Physics Reviews

    M. I. Dykman and M. A. Krivoglaz, in “Soviet Physics Reviews", edited by I. M. Khalatnikov (Harwood Academic, New York, 1984), Vol.5, pp. 265441

    1984

  33. [41]

    Noise in Nonlinear Dynamical Systems

    R. Graham, in “Noise in Nonlinear Dynamical Systems", edited by F. Moss and P. V. E. McClintock, Vol.1 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989), p. 225

    1989

  34. [42]

    Falkovich, K

    G. Falkovich, K. Gaw¸ edzki, and M. Vergassola,Particles and fields in fluid turbulence, Rev. Mod. Phys.73, 913 (2001)

    2001

  35. [43]

    Grosberg and H

    A. Grosberg and H. Frisch,Winding angle distribution for planar random walk, polymer ring entangled with an obstacle, and all that: Spitzer-Edwards-Prager-Frisch model revisited, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.36 8955 (2003)

    2003

  36. [44]

    Elgart and A

    V. Elgart and A. Kamenev,Rare event statistics in reaction-diffusion systems, Phys. Rev. E70, 041106 (2004)

    2004

  37. [45]

    In Memoriam Marc Yor - Séminaire de Probabilités XLVII

    N. Ikeda and H. Matsumoto in “In Memoriam Marc Yor - Séminaire de Probabilités XLVII”, edited by C. Donati-Martin, A. Lejay and A. Rouault, Lecture Notes in Mathematics (Springer, Cham, 2015), Vol. 2137, p. 497

    2015

  38. [46]

    Grafke, R

    T. Grafke, R. Grauer, and T. Schäfer,The instanton method and its numerical implementation in fluid mechanics, J. Phys. A 48, 333001 (2015)

    2015

  39. [47]

    Meerson and N

    B. Meerson and N. R. Smith,Geometrical optics of constrained Brownian motion: three short stories, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 52, 415001, (2019)

    2019

  40. [48]

    N. R. Smith and B. Meerson,Geometrical optics of constrained Brownian excursion: from the KPZ scaling to dynamical phase transitions, J. Stat. Mech.2019, 023205 (2019)

    2019

  41. [49]

    N. R. Smith, O. Farago,Nonequilibirum steady state for harmonically-confined active particles, Phys. Rev. E106, 054118 (2022)

    2022

  42. [50]

    N. R. Smith,Nonequilibrium steady state of trapped active particles, Phys. Rev. E108, L022602, (2023)

    2023

  43. [51]

    Bar and B

    T. Bar and B. Meerson,Geometrical optics of large deviations of Brownian motion in inhomogeneous media, J. Stat. Mech. 2023, 093301 (2023). 18

    2023

  44. [52]

    Valov, N

    A. Valov, N. Levi, B. Meerson,Thermally activated particle motion in biased correlated Gaussian disorder potentials, Phys. Rev. E 110, 024138 (2024)

    2024

  45. [53]

    R. J. Harris and H. Touchette,Current fluctuations in stochastic systems with long-range memory, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42, 342001 (2009)

    2009

  46. [54]

    R. J. Harris,Fluctuations in interacting particle systems with memory, J. Stat. Mech. (2015) P07021

    2015

  47. [55]

    R. L. Jack,Large deviations in models of growing clusters with symmetry-breaking transitions, Phys. Rev. E100, 012140 (2019)

    2019

  48. [56]

    R. L. Jack and R. J. Harris,Giant leaps and long excursions: Fluctuation mechanisms in systems with long-range memory, Phys. Rev. E102, 012154 (2020)

    2020

  49. [57]

    Agranov and G

    T. Agranov and G. Bunin,Extinctions of coupled populations, and rare event dynamics under non-Gaussian noise, Phys. Rev. E 104, 024106 (2021)

    2021

  50. [58]

    Bouchet, R

    F. Bouchet, R. Tribe and O. Zaboronski,Sample-path large deviations for stochastic evolutions driven by the square of a Gaussian process, Phys. Rev. E107, 034111 (2023)

    2023

  51. [59]

    Mukherjee and N.R

    S. Mukherjee and N.R. Smith,Large deviations in statistics of the convex hull of passive and active particles: A theoretical study, Phys. Rev. E109, 044120, (2024)

    2024

  52. [60]

    P. J. Paulino, I. Lesanovsky, F. Carollo,Large deviation full counting statistics in adiabatic open quantum dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 260402 (2024)

    2024

  53. [61]

    Dutta, A

    D. Dutta, A. Kundu, U. Basu,Inertial Dynamics of Run-and-Tumble Particle, arXiv:2411.19186

    arXiv

  54. [62]

    Tailleur, M

    J. Tailleur, M. E. Cates,Statistical Mechanics of Interacting Run-and-Tumble Bacteria, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 218103 (2008)

    2008

  55. [63]

    Tailleur, M

    J. Tailleur, M. E. Cates,Sedimentation, trapping, and rectification of dilute bacteria, Europhys. Lett.86, 60002 (2009)

    2009

  56. [64]

    U. Basu, S. N. Majumdar, A. Rosso, G. Schehr,Long time position distribution of an active Brownian particle in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. E100, 062116 (2019)

    2019

  57. [65]

    Santra, U

    I. Santra, U. Basu, and S. Sabhapandit,Run-and-tumble particles in two dimensions: Marginal position distributions, Phys. Rev. E101, 062120 (2020)

    2020

  58. [66]

    D. S. Dean, S. N. Majumdar, and H. Schawe,Position distribution in a generalized run-and-tumble process, Phys. Rev. E 103, 012130 (2021)

    2021

  59. [67]

    Touchette, Legendre-Fenchel transforms in a nutshell, https://appliedmaths.sun.ac.za/~htouchette/archive/ notes/lfth2.pdf

    H. Touchette, Legendre-Fenchel transforms in a nutshell, https://appliedmaths.sun.ac.za/~htouchette/archive/ notes/lfth2.pdf

  60. [68]

    Yamamoto, T

    E. Yamamoto, T. Akimoto, A. Mitsutake, and R. MetzlerUniversal Relation between Instantaneous Diffusivity and Radius of Gyration of Proteins in Aqueous Solution, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 128101, (2021)

    2021

  61. [69]

    A. V. Chechkin, F. Seno, R. Metzler, and I. M. Sokolov,Brownian yet Non-Gaussian Diffusion: From Superstatistics to Subordination of Diffusing Diffusivities, Phys. Rev. X7, 021002, (2017)

    2017

  62. [70]

    Barkai and S

    E. Barkai and S. Burov,Packets of Diffusing Particles Exhibit Universal Exponential Tails, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 060603 (2020)

    2020

  63. [71]

    W. Wang, E. Barkai, and S. Burov,Large Deviations for Continuous Time Random Walks, Entropy 22 (2020)

    2020

  64. [72]

    M. Hu, H. Chen, H. Wang, S. Burov, E. Barkai, and D. Wang,Triggering Gaussian-to-Exponential Transition of Displace- ment Distribution in Polymer Nanocomposites via Adsorption-Induced Trapping, ACS nano17 (2023)

    2023

  65. [73]

    Burov,Limit Forms of the Distribution of the Number of Renewals, arXiv:2007.00381

    S. Burov,Limit Forms of the Distribution of the Number of Renewals, arXiv:2007.00381

    2007 arXiv

  66. [74]

    R. K. Singh and S. Burov,Universal to nonuniversal transition of the statistics of rare events during the spread of random walks, Phys. Rev. E108 (2023)

    2023

  67. [75]

    Hamdi, S

    O. Hamdi, S. Burov, E. Barkai,Laplace’s first law of errors applied to diffusive motion, Eur. Phys. J. B97, 67 (2024)

    2024

  68. [76]

    R. K. Singh, S. Burov,The Emergence of Laplace Universality in Correlated Processes, arXiv:2410.23112

    arXiv

  69. [77]

    Chakraborty and Y

    I. Chakraborty and Y. Roichman,Disorder-induced Fickian, yet non-Gaussian diffusion in heterogeneous media, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 022020(R) (2020)

    2020

  70. [78]

    Schramma, C

    N. Schramma, C. P. Israëls, M. Jalaal,Chloroplasts in plant cells show active glassy behavior under low-light conditions, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.120 (2023)

    2023

  71. [79]

    Frydel,Positing the problem of stationary distributions of active particles as third-order differential equation, Phys

    D. Frydel,Positing the problem of stationary distributions of active particles as third-order differential equation, Phys. Rev. E 106, 024121 (2022)

    2022

  72. [80]

    N. R. Smith, P. Le Doussal, S. N. Majumdar, G. Schehr,Exact position distribution of a harmonically-confined run-and- tumble particle in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. E106, 054133 (2022)

    2022

  73. [81]

    Malakar, A

    K. Malakar, A. Das, A. Kundu, K. Vijay Kumar, A. Dhar,Steady state of an active Brownian particle in a two-dimensional harmonic trap, Phys. Rev. E101, 022610 (2020)

    2020

  74. [82]

    Graham and T

    R. Graham and T. Tél,Nonequilibrium potential for coexisting attractors, Phys. Rev. A33, 1322 (1986)

    1986

  75. [83]

    Herman, J

    A. Herman, J. W. Ager, S. Ardo, G. Segev,Ratchet-Based Ion Pumps for Selective Ion SeparationsPhys. Rev. X Energy 2, 023001 (2023)

    2023

  76. [84]

    Le Doussal, S

    P. Le Doussal, S. N. Majumdar, and G. Schehr,Velocity and diffusion constant of an active particle in a one-dimensional force field, Europhys. Lett.130, 40002 (2020)

    2020

  77. [85]

    Angelani, A

    L. Angelani, A. Costanzo, and R. Di Leonardo,Active ratchets. EPL 96, 68002 (2011)

    2011

  78. [86]

    Martin, T

    D. Martin, T. A. de Pirey,AOUP in the presence of Brownian noise: a perturbative approach, J. Stat. Mech. (2021), 043205

    2021

  79. [87]

    Martin, J

    D. Martin, J. O’Byrne, M. E. Cates, E. Fodor, C. Nardini, J. Tailleur and F. van Wijland,Statistical mechanics of active Ornstein-Uhlenbeck particles, Phys. Rev. E103, 032607 (2021). 19

    2021

  80. [88]

    O’Byrne, Y

    J. O’Byrne, Y. Kafri, J. Tailleur and F. van Wijland,Time irreversibility in active matter, from micro to macro, Nature Reviews Physics 4, 167 (2022)

    2022

  81. [89]

    M. O. Magnasco,Forced thermal ratchets, Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 1477 (1993)

    1993

  82. [90]

    M. O. Magnasco,Molecular combustion motors, Phys. Rev. Lett.72, 2656 (1994)

    1994

  83. [91]

    Ajdari, D

    A. Ajdari, D. Mukamel, L. Peliti, and J. Prost,Rectified motion induced by ac forces in periodic structures, Journal de Physique I 4, 1551 (1994)

    1994

  84. [92]

    Guéneau, S

    M. Guéneau, S. N. Majumdar, G. Schehr,Run-and-tumble particle in one-dimensional potentials: mean first-passage time and applications, Phys. Rev. E111, 014144 (2025)

    2025

  85. [93]

    Miyaguchi, T

    T. Miyaguchi, T. Uneyama, and Takuma Akimoto,Brownian motion with alternately fluctuating diffusivity: Stretched- exponential and power-law relaxation, Phys. Rev. E100, 012116 (2019)

    2019

  86. [94]

    Guéneau, S

    M. Guéneau, S. N. Majumdar, G. Schehr,Large Deviations in Switching Diffusion: from Free Cumulants to Dynamical Transitions, arXiv:2501.13754

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.