Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 42 references

Ab-initio study of the beta Fe2O3 phase

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that bulk beta-Fe2O3 has a zero-magnetization Kramers antiferromagnetic ground state, with a bulk d-wave altermagnetic phase close in energy, and that at realistic Coulomb repulsion it is a charge-transfer insulator with…

desk verdict Solid DFT+U study of beta-Fe2O3 with a plausible Kramers-AFM ground state and close-in-energy d-wave altermagnet; the main caveat is the restricted magnetic configuration search. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.03237 v1 pith:ZDYDGYCN submitted 2024-12-04 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Priyanka Mishra , Carmine Autieri This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords beta-Fe2O3iron(III)oxideKramersantiferromagnetd-wavealtermagnetismcharge-transferinsulatorDFT+UmagneticfrustrationNeeltemperature
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish the magnetic and electronic ground state of the rare cubic $\beta$ phase of iron(III) oxide. By scanning total energies over sixteen zero-moment collinear spin arrangements plus ferromagnetic and ferrimagnetic ones, it concludes that the lowest-energy state is a Kramers antiferromagnet: the 8 $\mathrm{Fe}_a$ atoms order in G-type antiferromagnetism while the 24 $\mathrm{Fe}_b$ atoms are ferromagnetically aligned along each zig-zag chain, giving an $\uparrow\uparrow\downarrow\downarrow$ pattern and zero net magnetization. A bulk d-wave altermagnetic state lies close in energy, and at $U=4$ eV the system is a charge-transfer insulator with an indirect band gap of 1.5 eV. Because first-neighbor $\mathrm{Fe}_a$-$\mathrm{Fe}_b$ exchange cancels in the mean-field estimate of the ordering temperature, the remaining second-neighbor exchanges explain the low experimental $T_N$ near 119 K.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the 32-iron unit cell of $\beta$-Fe$_2$O$_3$, consisting of 8 $\mathrm{Fe}_a$ atoms at cube-corner positions and 24 $\mathrm{Fe}_b$ atoms linked into zig-zag $\mathrm{Fe}_a$-$\mathrm{Fe}_b$-$\mathrm{Fe}_a$-$\mathrm{Fe}_b$ chains along all three cubic directions. The argument proceeds by enumerating the four zero-moment $\mathrm{Fe}_a$ patterns (A-, C-, F-, and G-type) combined with four patterns for $\mathrm{Fe}_b$ that are uniform along each chain, and comparing first-principles total energies as a function of the Coulomb repulsion. The key identity is that in the winning G-type plus ferromagnetic-$\mathrm{Fe}_b$ configuration, the first-neighbor $\mathrm{Fe}_a$-$\mathrm{Fe}_b$ exchange is half satisfied and half frustrated in a way that cancels it from the mean-field Heisenberg expression for $T_N$, so the ordering temperature is controlled entirely by second-neighbor same-kind exchanges.

What would settle it

A neutron diffraction measurement that resolves the $\mathrm{Fe}_a$ and $\mathrm{Fe}_b$ sublattice moments would settle the magnetic claim: the ground state predicts zero net moment with $\mathrm{Fe}_b$ moments following the $\uparrow\uparrow\downarrow\downarrow$ chain pattern, whereas a different $\mathrm{Fe}_b$ stacking would rule it out. A complementary computational falsifier is a first-principles search allowing $\mathrm{Fe}_b$ orderings that vary along the zig-zag chains; if any such ordering falls below the G-type plus ferromagnetic-$\mathrm{Fe}_b$ state, the central ground-state claim is wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central claim is that the magnetic ground state of bulk $\beta$-Fe$_2$O$_3$ is a Kramers antiferromagnet, meaning the opposite-spin sublattices are related by inversion and the band structure stays doubly degenerate. The winning collinear arrangement has $\mathrm{Fe}_a$ spins in G-type order (each $\mathrm{Fe}_a$ opposite to every neighboring $\mathrm{Fe}_a$) and $\mathrm{Fe}_b$ spins matching their $\mathrm{Fe}_a$ partners along the zig-zag chains, producing the sequence $\uparrow\uparrow\downarrow\downarrow$ and satisfying most of the expected antiferromagnetic couplings. The third-lowest energy state is a bulk d-wave altermagnet, with nonrelativistic spin-splitting that the paper calls fragile, separated from the ground state by a small energy difference that remains stable across the scanned Coulomb repulsion. At $U=4$ eV the compound is a charge-transfer insulator, with the gap opening between oxygen-derived valence states and iron-derived conduction states, an indirect gap of 1.5 eV, a charge-transfer energy near 5 eV, and a Hubbard splitting near 9 eV. The paper further argues that in the ground state the first-neighbor $\mathrm{Fe}_a$-$\mathrm{Fe}_b$ exchange drops out of the mean-field estimate of the N\'eel temperature, leaving second-neighbor exchanges as the dominant scale and naturally explaining why $T_N$ is much lower than in the $\alpha$ and $\gamma$ phases.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation restricts the $\mathrm{Fe}_b$ moments to patterns that are uniform along each zig-zag chain, so if a lower-energy non-uniform $\mathrm{Fe}_b$ ordering exists, the claimed G-type Kramers antiferromagnet would not be the true ground state.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The zero-magnetization ground state matches the experimentally observed antiferromagnetism and gives a concrete reason for the low 119 K N\'eel temperature: the leading exchange cancels and only weaker second-neighbor couplings set the scale.
  • Because the d-wave altermagnetic state sits close in energy, strain, doping, or finite-size effects could switch $\beta$-Fe$_2$O$_3$ between Kramers antiferromagnet and altermagnet behavior.
  • At $U=4$ eV, the 1.5 eV indirect charge-transfer gap makes bulk $\beta$-Fe$_2$O$_3$ a semiconductor candidate for photocatalysis and related applications, provided the metastable phase can be stabilized.
  • Since the $\alpha$ phase is an altermagnet and the $\beta$ phase is a Kramers antiferromagnet, the paper concludes that phase coexistence can be distinguished by measuring weak ferromagnetism: only the $\alpha$ phase contributes it.
  • Reduced dimensionality should lower $T_N$ further, and by the Mermin-Wagner theorem zero-dimensional nanoparticles are expected to be even less magnetic.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next step, not taken in the paper, is to extract the full set of exchange parameters from the total energies and run classical Monte Carlo simulations, which would test whether the cancellation of first-neighbor exchange really yields a $T_N$ close to 119 K.
  • The near-degenerate d-wave altermagnet suggests that epitaxial strain or electric fields might stabilize the altermagnetic phase in thin films, an opportunity the paper leaves unexplored.
  • The assumption that $\mathrm{Fe}_b$ order is uniform along each zig-zag chain could be relaxed to non-uniform or non-collinear patterns; a complete search would either confirm the G-type ground state or reveal a lower-energy competitor.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports DFT+U calculations for the cubic bixbyite β-Fe2O3 phase. It searches over 16 collinear zero-net-magnetization magnetic configurations constructed from four Fe_a patterns (A, C, F, G) and four Fe_b patterns that are uniform along the zig-zag chains. It identifies a G-type Fe_a with ferromagnetic Fe_b alignment as the lowest-energy state across U = 0–6 eV, and labels this state a Kramers antiferromagnet. A state with F-type Fe_a and FM Fe_b (the third-lowest state) is labeled a d-wave altermagnet close in energy. The paper also reports an indirect band gap of about 1.5 eV at U = 4 eV and classifies the system as a charge-transfer insulator, and offers a qualitative explanation of the low Néel temperature based on cancellation of first-neighbor exchanges.

Significance. If the central claims are upheld, the paper would provide the first ab initio characterization of the magnetic and electronic structure of β-Fe2O3, identifying a Kramers antiferromagnetic ground state with a proximate d-wave altermagnetic phase. The systematic U scan and the consistency of the energy ordering across U are valuable, and the charge-transfer insulator classification with a gap of about 1.5 eV is a concrete prediction. However, the significance is currently limited by the restricted magnetic configuration search and the lack of direct evidence for the altermagnetic and Kramers classifications. The paper's contribution would be strengthened if these load-bearing points are addressed.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III.B] The magnetic ground state search is restricted to Fe_b configurations that are uniform along each zig-zag chain, as stated in Sec. III.B: "we assume the ones that are uniform along the zig-zag chain along a given axis." This reduces the zero-net-momentum search to 16 collinear configurations. Non-uniform Fe_b patterns within a chain and non-collinear orderings are not considered. Because the paper itself motivates magnetic frustration (Secs. I and III.A), these omitted configurations could plausibly be lower in energy. Consequently, the conclusion that the ground state is a Kramers antiferromagnet is a statement about the considered subspace, not the global magnetic ground state. To support the abstract's claim, the authors should either extend the search (for example, with spin-spiral or larger supercell calculations, or by relaxing the uniformity assumption) or explicitly qualify the conclusion as valid within the restricted space.
  2. [Sec. IV.B] The classification of the third lowest energy state as a "B-2 d-wave altermagnet" and the ground state as a "Kramers antiferromagnet" is not supported by any direct calculation shown in the manuscript. No spin-resolved band structure is presented for the third state, and no symmetry analysis (e.g., spin-group or irreducible-representation analysis) is given to establish the altermagnetic spin-splitting or the Kramers degeneracy. The double degeneracy noted in the caption of Fig. 5(b) is consistent with Kramers degeneracy but is not analyzed. Please provide the spin-split band structure of the altermagnetic state and a symmetry-based justification for both classifications, or temper the claims accordingly.
  3. [Sec. IV.B] The quantitative basis for the Néel temperature explanation is missing. The statement that the ground state's total energy is unaffected by the first-neighbor exchange J_{Fea-Feb} in the Heisenberg model is not demonstrated, and no mean-field expression or numerical estimate of T_N is given. The text claims that the mean-field T_N will depend exclusively on second-neighbor exchanges, but the relevant exchange constants (J_{Fea-Fea}, J^{inter}_{Feb-Feb}, J^{intra}_{Feb-Feb}) are not extracted from the total energies. Without these, the comparison to the experimental T_N of 119 K is not quantitative. Please provide the Heisenberg-model derivation and the extracted exchange parameters, or explicitly state the claim as a qualitative suggestion.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. IV.A] In the description of the band gap, "the maximum of the conduction band is at the Γ point" appears to be a typo; the intended statement is likely that the maximum of the valence band is at Γ, while the minimum of the conduction band lies along Γ-R, making the gap indirect.
  2. [Abstract and Sec. IV.B] The phrase "first-neighbor of the same kind" is ambiguous because nearest neighbors in this structure are Fe_a and Fe_b, which are of different kinds; the intended meaning is likely nearest neighbors of the same species, which are in fact second neighbors in distance. Please rephrase for clarity.
  3. [Sec. IV.B] In the sentence "this is one of the factors that contribute to explaining the low Néel temperature compared to the β-phase compared to the α-phase," the repeated "compared to" is confusing; it should probably read "compared to the α-phase."
  4. [References] Several references appear mismatched: Ref. [21] is cited for the experimental Néel temperature of 119 K for β-Fe2O3, but the title of that reference is "Zeta-Fe2O3 – A new stable polymorph in iron(III) oxide family", and Ref. [20] seems to be about dielectric parameters of Fe2O3-doped polymer composites rather than phase coexistence. Please verify these citations.
  5. [Fig. 4(b) caption] In the caption, "the magnetic ground" should be "the magnetic ground state."

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the magnetic ground-state ranking is obtained from independent DFT total energies, not from the experimental input or from the authors' prior work.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained at the level of total-energy comparisons. The zero-net-magnetization candidate set is narrowed because 'Experimental studies suggest that the ground state is an antiferromagnetic phase' (Sec. III.B), but the paper does not stop there: it computes ferromagnetic, ferrimagnetic, and 16 zero-moment configurations from first principles (Table I) and finds the FM and FiM states higher in energy, so the zero-moment conclusion is not identical to the input by construction. The specific G-type Fe_a ordering with ferromagnetic Fe_b chains, the near-degenerate d-wave altermagnet, and the 1.5 eV gap at U=4 eV are outputs of DFT+U calculations, with U=4 eV taken from prior independent literature ([30,31]) rather than fitted to the paper's own predictions. The self-citations ([9,12-15,34]) appear in review or illustrative contexts and do not carry the ground-state argument. The uniformity assumption for Fe_b configurations along zig-zag chains (Sec. III.B: 'we assume the ones that are uniform along the zig-zag chain along a given axis') is an acknowledged search-space restriction that could miss lower-energy states, but that is a completeness or robustness limitation, not a circular reduction, since the energies actually computed are not derived from the conclusion. No load-bearing circular step was identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central calculation inherits standard DFT inputs and a Materials Project structure; the two paper-specific choices are the Hubbard U value and the restricted Fe_b configuration set, plus standard domain assumptions of DFT+U and mean-field magnetism. No new particles, forces, or dimensions are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • U_eff (Hubbard U on Fe 3d) = 4 eV; scanned 0-6 eV
    Central results (1.5 eV gap, energy ordering) are reported at U=4 eV, chosen from prior alpha-Fe2O3 literature rather than fit to beta-phase data; the gap is linear in U.
  • JH (Hund coupling) = 0.15 U (0.6 eV at U=4 eV)
    Adopted typical transition-metal ratio; affects total-energy differences and band gap.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption DFT+U total-energy differences correctly order magnetic configurations within the collinear spin approximation.
    The entire ground-state determination rests on comparing total energies from VASP (Table I, Fig. 4).
  • ad hoc to paper Fe_b magnetic configurations can be restricted to patterns uniform along each zig-zag chain.
    Sec. III.B states this restriction explicitly; non-uniform Fe_b orderings are not evaluated, so the global ground state may be missed.
  • domain assumption Goodenough-Kanamori rules give antiferromagnetic exchange for half-filled d5 Fe pairs.
    Used in Sec. III to expect frustration and to motivate candidate spin arrangements.
  • domain assumption The mean-field Heisenberg model with first-neighbor cancellation is sufficient to explain the low Neel temperature.
    Sec. IV.B infers TN behavior qualitatively; no explicit mean-field calculation or exchange constants are given.
  • domain assumption The Materials Project mp-565814 structure is an adequate representation of the beta-Fe2O3 crystal geometry without further relaxation.
    All calculations inherit this structural input; magnetic energy differences depend on bond angles and distances.
  • domain assumption Spin-orbit coupling and non-collinear magnetism can be neglected for identifying the ground-state ordering.
    The paper uses collinear magnetic states throughout; weak ferromagnetism and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions known in alpha-Fe2O3 are not treated for beta-Fe2O3.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ab-initio study of the beta Fe2O3 phase." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZDYDGYCN

@misc{pith2026241203237,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ab-initio study of the beta Fe2O3 phase},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZDYDGYCN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.03237}
}
abstract

We present first-principles results on the electronic and magnetic properties of the cubic bulk $\beta$-phase of iron(III) oxide (Fe$_2$O$_3$). Given that all Fe-Fe magnetic couplings are expected to be antiferromagnetic within this high-symmetry crystal structure, the system may exhibit some signature of magnetic frustration, making it challenging to identify its magnetic ground state. We have analyzed the possible magnetic phases of the $\beta$-phase among which there are ferrimagnets, altermagnets and Kramers antiferromagnets. While the $\alpha$-phase is an altermagnet and the $\gamma$-phase is a ferrimagnet, we conclude that the magnetic ground state for the bulk $\beta$-phase of Fe$_2$O$_3$ is a Kramers antiferromagnet, moreover, we find that close in energy there is a bulk d-wave altermagnetic phase. We report the density of states and the evolution band gap as a function of the electronic correlations, for suitable values of the Coulomb repulsion the system is a charge-transfer insulator with an indirect band gap of 1.5 eV. As the opposite to the $\gamma$-phase, the magnetic configuration between first-neighbor of the same kind is always antiferromagnetic while the magnetic configuration between Fe$_a$ and Fe$_b$ is ferro or antiferro. In this magnetic arrangement, first-neighbor interactions cancel out in the mean-field estimation of the N\'eel temperature, leaving second-neighbor magnetic exchanges as the primary contributors, resulting in a N\'eel temperature lower than that of other phases. Our work paves the way toward the ab initio study of nanoparticles and alloys for the $\beta$-phase of Fe$_2$O$_3$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.03237 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Crystal structure of the β-Fe2O3 phase. The Fea, Feb and oxygen atoms are represented by blue, brown and red balls, respectively. (a) The system presents two kinds of FeO6 octahedra which are FeaO6 and FebO6 represented in blue and brown, respectively. (b) There are 8 FeaO6 oc￾tahedra which are centered at the high-symmetry positions (0.50±0.25a,0.50±0.25a,0.50±0.25a) where a is the lattice con￾stant. respect to the… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Inequivalent magnetic configurations of the Fe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. (a) Energy differences per formula units and (b) evo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Total and atomic-resolved DOS for the (a) second [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Real space magnetic configuration of the ground [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Main exchange couplings for the β-phase of Fe2O3. The only first neighbor coupling is JF ea−F eb . Regarding the second neighbors couplings, these are between atoms of the same kind which can be interchain (inter) or intrachain (intra). Due to the structural properties…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Con- trollable Synthesis, Photocatalytic Property, and Mech- anism of a Novel POM-Based Direct Z-Scheme Nano- Heterojunction α-Fe2O3/P2Mo18

    Zhang, Y.; Zhao, M.; Huang, J.; Zhao, N.; Yu, H. Con- trollable Synthesis, Photocatalytic Property, and Mech- anism of a Novel POM-Based Direct Z-Scheme Nano- Heterojunction α-Fe2O3/P2Mo18. Molecules 2023, 28

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Due to the structural properties, it is not possible to have a magnetic configuration that satisfies all antiferromagnetic couplings

    The magnetic coupling between two atoms with half-filling configuration results in an antiferromagnetic coupling due to the virtual hop- ping (t) producing a gain in energy proportional to - t2 U especially in transition metal oxides[ 33, 34]. Due to the structural properties, it is not possible to have a magnetic configuration that satisfies all antiferr...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Syn- thesis of Fe2O3 Nanorod and NiFe2O4 Nanoparticle Com- posites on Expired Cotton Fiber Cloth for Enhanced Hydrogen Evolution Reaction

    Hua, S.; Shah, S.A.; Ullah, N.; Ullah, N.; Yuan, A. Syn- thesis of Fe2O3 Nanorod and NiFe2O4 Nanoparticle Com- posites on Expired Cotton Fiber Cloth for Enhanced Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Molecules 2024, 29

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    A review of the α-Fe2O3 (hematite) nanotube structure: recent advances in synthesis, charac- terization, and applications

    Xue, Y.; Wang, Y. A review of the α-Fe2O3 (hematite) nanotube structure: recent advances in synthesis, charac- terization, and applications. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 10912– 10932. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0NR02705G

    work page doi:10.1039/d0nr02705g 2020

  5. [5]

    Efficient terahertz emission from R-plane α-Fe2O3/Pt

    Agarwal, R.; Li, Z.; Khan, K.I.A.; Chia, E.E.M.; Muduli, P.K. Efficient terahertz emission from R-plane α-Fe2O3/Pt. Phys. Rev. B 2024, 109, 224408. https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.224408

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.109.224408 2024

  6. [6]

    Effects of atomic vibrations on the electronic structure and the photocatalytic efficiency of α-Fe2O3

    Luo, H.; Lyu, S. Effects of atomic vibrations on the electronic structure and the photocatalytic efficiency of α-Fe2O3. Phys. Rev. B 2024, 109, 195203. https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.195203

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.109.195203 2024

  7. [7]

    Green Synthesis of Magnetic Fe2O3 Nanoparticle with Chenopodium glau- cum L

    Thakur, R.; Kaur, N.; Kaur, M.; Bhowmik, P.K.; Han, H.; Singh, K.; Husain, F.M.; Sohal, H.S. Green Synthesis of Magnetic Fe2O3 Nanoparticle with Chenopodium glau- cum L. as Recyclable Heterogeneous Catalyst for One-Pot Reactions and Heavy Metal Adsorption. Molecules 2024,

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Revealing the Altermagnetism in Hematite via XMCD Imaging and Anomalous Hall Electrical Transport

    Galindez-Ruales, E.F.; ˇSmejkal, L.; Das, S.; Baek, E.; Schmitt, C.; Fuhrmann, F.; Ross, A.; Gonz´ alez- Hern´ andez, R.; Rothschild, A.; Sinova, J.; et al. Al- termagnetism in the hopping regime, 2024, [arXiv:cond- mat.mtrl-sci/2310.16907]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

Show all 42 references
  1. [9]

    A thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferromagnetism of antiferromagnetics

    Dzyaloshinsky, I. A thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferromagnetism of antiferromagnetics. Jour- nal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 1958, 4, 241–

    1958

  2. [10]

    Bulk generalized Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction inPT -symmetric anti- ferromagnets

    Mahfouzi, F.; Kioussis, N. Bulk generalized Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction inPT -symmetric anti- ferromagnets. Phys. Rev. B 2022, 106, L220404. https: 7 //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.106.L220404

    2022 doi

  3. [11]

    Emerging Re- search Landscape of Altermagnetism

    ˇSmejkal, L.; Sinova, J.; Jungwirth, T. Emerging Re- search Landscape of Altermagnetism. Phys. Rev. X 2022, 12, 040501. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX. 12.040501

    2022 doi

  4. [12]

    Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction inducing weak ferro- magnetism in centrosymmetric altermagnets and weak fer- rimagnetism in noncentrosymmetric altermagnets

    Autieri, C.; Sattigeri, R.M.; Cuono, G.; Fakhredine, A. Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction inducing weak ferro- magnetism in centrosymmetric altermagnets and weak fer- rimagnetism in noncentrosymmetric altermagnets. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.07678 2023

    2023 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Orbital-selective altermagnetism and correlation- enhanced spin-splitting in strongly-correlated transition metal oxides

    Cuono, G.; Sattigeri, R.M.; Skolimowski, J.; Autieri, C. Orbital-selective altermagnetism and correlation- enhanced spin-splitting in strongly-correlated transition metal oxides. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Ma- terials 2023, 586, 171163. https://doi.org/https: //doi.org/...

    2023

  6. [14]

    Wurtzite vs

    Grzybowski, M.J.; Autieri, C.; Domagala, J.; Krasucki, C.; Kaleta, A.; Kret, S.; Gas, K.; Sawicki, M.; Bo˙ zek, R.; Suffczy´ nski, J.; et al. Wurtzite vs. rock-salt MnSe epitaxy: electronic and altermagnetic properties. Nanoscale 2024, 16, 6259–6267

    2024

  7. [15]

    Altermagnetic surface states: towards the observation and utilization of altermagnetism in thin films, interfaces and topological materials

    Sattigeri, R.M.; Cuono, G.; Autieri, C. Altermagnetic surface states: towards the observation and utilization of altermagnetism in thin films, interfaces and topological materials. Nanoscale 2023, 15, 16998–17005. https: //doi.org/10.1039/D3NR03681B

    2023 doi

  8. [16]

    Non-relativistic ferromag- netotriakontadipolar order and spin splitting in hematite, 2024, [arXiv:cond-mat.str-el/2405.10675]

    Verbeek, X.H.; Voderholzer, D.; Sch¨ aren, S.; Gachnang, Y.; Spaldin, N.A.; Bhowal, S. Non-relativistic ferromag- netotriakontadipolar order and spin splitting in hematite, 2024, [arXiv:cond-mat.str-el/2405.10675]

    2024 arXiv

  9. [17]

    On the sign of the linear magnetoelectric coefficient in Cr2O3

    Bousquet, E.; Leli` evre-Berna, E.; Qureshi, N.; Soh, J.R.; Spaldin, N.A.; Urru, A.; Verbeek, X.H.; Weber, S.F. On the sign of the linear magnetoelectric coefficient in Cr2O3. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 2024, 36, 155701. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/ad1a59

    2024 doi

  10. [18]

    Interplay between altermagnetism and nonsymmorphic symmetries generating large anomalous Hall conductiv- ity by semi-Dirac points induced anticrossings

    Fakhredine, A.; Sattigeri, R.M.; Cuono, G.; Autieri, C. Interplay between altermagnetism and nonsymmorphic symmetries generating large anomalous Hall conductiv- ity by semi-Dirac points induced anticrossings. Phys. Rev. B 2023, 108, 115138. https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevB.108.115138

    2023

  11. [19]

    Crys- tal Structure of β-Fe2O3 and Topotactic Phase Transfor- mation to α-Fe2O3

    Danno, T.; Nakatsuka, D.; Kusano, Y.; Asaoka, H.; Nakanishi, M.; Fujii, T.; Ikeda, Y.; Takada, J. Crys- tal Structure of β-Fe2O3 and Topotactic Phase Transfor- mation to α-Fe2O3. Crystal Growth and Design 2013, 13, 770–774. https://doi.org/10.1021/cg301493a

    2013 doi

  12. [20]

    Analysis of Dielectric Parameters of Fe2O3-Doped Polyvinylidene Fluoride/Poly(methyl methacrylate) Blend Composites

    Bafna, M.; Deeba, F.; Gupta, A.K.; Shrivastava, K.; Kul- shrestha, V.; Jain, A. Analysis of Dielectric Parameters of Fe2O3-Doped Polyvinylidene Fluoride/Poly(methyl methacrylate) Blend Composites. Molecules 2023, 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28155722

    2023 doi

  13. [21]

    Role of Iron Oxide (Fe2O3) Nanocomposites in Advanced Biomedical Applications: A State-of-the-Art Review

    Pourmadadi, M.; Rahmani, E.; Shamsabadipour, A.; Mahtabian, S.; Ahmadi, M.; Rahdar, A.; D´ ıez-Pascual, A.M. Role of Iron Oxide (Fe2O3) Nanocomposites in Advanced Biomedical Applications: A State-of-the-Art Review. Nanomaterials 2022, 12

    2022

  14. [22]

    First Observation of Phase Transformation of All Four Fe2O3Phases (γ → ϵ → β → α-Phase)

    Sakurai, S.; Namai, A.; Hashimoto, K.; Ohkoshi, S.i. First Observation of Phase Transformation of All Four Fe2O3Phases (γ → ϵ → β → α-Phase). Journal of the American Chemical Society 2009, 131, 18299–18303. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja9046069

    2009 doi

  15. [23]

    Inhomogeneous Electron Gas

    Hohenberg, P.; Kohn, W. Inhomogeneous Electron Gas. Phys. Rev. 1964, 136, B864–B871. https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRev.136.B864

    1964

  16. [24]

    Zeta- Fe2O3 – A new stable polymorph in iron(III) oxide family

    Tuˇ cek, J.; Machala, L.; Ono, S.; Namai, A.; Yoshikiyo, M.; Imoto, K.; Tokoro, H.; Ohkoshi, S.i.; Zboˇ ril, R. Zeta- Fe2O3 – A new stable polymorph in iron(III) oxide family. Scientific Reports 2015, 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/ srep15091

    2015

  17. [25]

    Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set

    Kresse, G.; Furthm¨ uller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 1996, 54, 11169–11186. https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169

    1996 doi

  18. [26]

    From ultrasoft pseudopoten- tials to the projector augmented-wave method

    Kresse, G.; Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopoten- tials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 59, 1758–1775. https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevB.59.1758

    1999

  19. [27]

    Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals

    Kresse, G.; Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys. Rev. B 1993, 47, 558–561. https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.47.558

    1993 doi

  20. [28]

    Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation

    Jain, A.; Ong, S.P.; Hautier, G.; Chen, W.; Richards, W.D.; Dacek, S.; Cholia, S.; Gunter, D.; Skinner, D.; Ceder, G.; et al. Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Materials 2013, 1. https://doi.org/ 10.1063/1.4812323

    2013 doi

  21. [29]

    https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29194583

    doi

  22. [30]

    Generalized Gra- dient Approximation Made Simple

    Perdew, J.P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gra- dient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865–3868. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 77.3865

    1996 doi

  23. [31]

    First-principles calculations of hematite ( α-Fe2O3) by self-consistent DFT+U+V

    Naveas, N.; Pulido, R.; Marini, C.; Hern´ andez- Montelongo, J.; Silv´ an, M.M. First-principles calculations of hematite ( α-Fe2O3) by self-consistent DFT+U+V. iScience 2023, 26, 106033. https://doi.org/https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.106033

    2023

  24. [32]

    Density- functional theory and strong interactions: Orbital order- ing in Mott-Hubbard insulators

    Liechtenstein, A.I.; Anisimov, V.I.; Zaanen, J. Density- functional theory and strong interactions: Orbital order- ing in Mott-Hubbard insulators. Phys. Rev. B 1995, 52, R5467–R5470. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB. 52.R5467

    1995 doi

  25. [33]

    First- principles calculation of the structure and magnetic phases of hematite

    Rollmann, G.; Rohrbach, A.; Entel, P.; Hafner, J. First- principles calculation of the structure and magnetic phases of hematite. Phys. Rev. B 2004, 69, 165107. https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.69.165107

    2004 doi

  26. [34]

    Polar Order and Frustrated Antiferromagnetism in Perovskite Pb2MnWO6 Single Crystals

    Ivanov, S.A.; Bush, A.A.; Stash, A.I.; Kamentsev, K.E.; Shkuratov, V.Y.; Kvashnin, Y.O.; Autieri, C.; Di Marco, I.; Sanyal, B.; Eriksson, O.; et al. Polar Order and Frustrated Antiferromagnetism in Perovskite Pb2MnWO6 Single Crystals. Inorganic Chemistry 2016, 55, 2791–2805. h...

    2016 doi

  27. [35]

    VESTA3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data

    Momma, K.; Izumi, F. VESTA3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data. Journal of Applied Crystallography 2011, 44, 1272–1276. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889811038970

    2011 doi

  28. [36]

    Quantitative Interpreta- tion of the Goodenough-Kanamori Rules: A Critical Analysis

    Weihe, H.; G¨ udel, H.U. Quantitative Interpreta- tion of the Goodenough-Kanamori Rules: A Critical Analysis. Inorganic Chemistry 1997, 36, 3632–3639, [https://doi.org/10.1021/ic961502+]. PMID: 11670054, https://doi.org/10.1021/ic961502+

    1997 doi

  29. [37]

    Beyond Con- ventional Ferromagnetism and Antiferromagnetism: A Phase with Nonrelativistic Spin and Crystal Rotation 8 Symmetry

    ˇSmejkal, L.; Sinova, J.; Jungwirth, T. Beyond Con- ventional Ferromagnetism and Antiferromagnetism: A Phase with Nonrelativistic Spin and Crystal Rotation 8 Symmetry. Phys. Rev. X 2022, 12, 031042. https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.12.031042

    2022 doi

  30. [38]

    Neutron Diffraction Study of the Magnetic Properties of the Series of Perovskite-Type Compounds [(1 −x)La,x Ca]MnO3

    Wollan, E.O.; Koehler, W.C. Neutron Diffraction Study of the Magnetic Properties of the Series of Perovskite-Type Compounds [(1 −x)La,x Ca]MnO3. Phys. Rev. 1955, 100, 545–563. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.100. 545

    1955 doi

  31. [39]

    Band gaps and electronic structure of transition-metal compounds

    Zaanen, J.; Sawatzky, G.A.; Allen, J.W. Band gaps and electronic structure of transition-metal compounds. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1985, 55, 418–421. https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.418

    1985 doi

  32. [41]

    Fragile altermagnetism and orbital disorder in Mott insulator LaTiO3

    Maznichenko, I.V.; Ernst, A.; Maryenko, D.; Dugaev, V.K.; Sherman, E.Y.; Buczek, P.; Parkin, S.S.P.; Ostanin, S. Fragile altermagnetism and orbital disorder in Mott insulator LaTiO3. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2024, 8, 064403. https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevMaterials.8.064403

    2024

  33. [42]

    Energetic stability and magnetic properties of MnO in the rocksalt, wurtzite, and zinc-blende structures: Influence of exchange and correlation

    Schr¨ on, A.; R¨ odl, C.; Bechstedt, F. Energetic stability and magnetic properties of MnO in the rocksalt, wurtzite, and zinc-blende structures: Influence of exchange and correlation. Phys. Rev. B 2010, 82, 165109. https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.82.165109

    2010 doi

  34. [255]

    https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0022-3697(58)90076-3

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.