Pith. sign in

REVIEW

When can we see micromotion? Experimental and theoretical analysis of the ChiSCAT scheme

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.03365 v1 pith:22BSHUHG submitted 2024-12-04 physics.optics

When can we see micromotion? Experimental and theoretical analysis of the ChiSCAT scheme

classification physics.optics
keywords chiscatnoiseschemeanalysisdominatedimprovemicromotionmotions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present an in-depth analysis of ChiSCAT, a recently introduced interferometric microscopy scheme to detect recurring micromotion events in cells. Experimentally, we demonstrate that illumination with low-coherence sources can greatly improve the robustness of the scheme to vibrations. Theoretically, we analyze the performance of ChiSCAT under various noise models, in particular photon shot noise and noise dominated by cellular motions other than the signal. We finally propose ways to improve performance, especially in a setting dominated by cell motions, and conclude with an outlook on potential future directions.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.