Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 73 references

Characterization of local energy transfer in large-scale intermittent stratified turbulent flows via coarse graining

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Vertical drafts in stratified turbulence act as local switches that redirect energy toward both large and small scales, strengthening kinetic-potential coupling near the buoyancy scale.

desk verdict A genuinely useful coarse-graining toolkit for stratified flows, with draft-conditioned local flux statistics that are suggestive but not yet causal, and a validation gap at the pointwise level. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.03384 v2 pith:NFZZLTLN submitted 2024-12-04 physics.flu-dyn physics.ao-phphysics.comp-ph

Raffaello Foldes , Raffaele Marino , Silvio Sergio Cerri , Enrico Camporeale This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.flu-dynphysics.ao-phphysics.comp-ph PACS 47.27.-i47.27.E
keywords stratifiedturbulencecoarsegrainingenergycascadeverticalvelocitydraftsintermittencyBoussinesqequationsbuoyancyfluxsub-filterscale
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that in stably stratified turbulence, rare but powerful vertical velocity drafts act as local switches for the energy cascade: inside the small volume they occupy, they strengthen forward (downscale) transfer of kinetic and total energy at intermediate scales and make potential energy flow in both directions at once. This is established by refining the coarse-graining (space-filtering) method to produce pointwise estimates of cross-scale energy fluxes in simulations of the Boussinesq equations, rather than the volume-integrated Fourier fluxes used before. The authors show that in regions with $|w/\sigma_w|$ above four, the local kinetic and total energy transfer is up to ten times the domain average, peaking near $k_\perp\approx 15\approx 2k_B$, while along the parallel direction the total flux is upscale below the buoyancy wavenumber $k_B\approx 7$ and downscale above it. These results matter because they connect large-scale intermittency, namely drafts observed in the atmosphere and oceans, to the local machinery of mixing and dissipation, suggesting where and how energy is routed across scales.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the coarse-grained (space-filtered) energy budget of the Boussinesq equations, restricted to anisotropic reduced fluxes by filtering along either the perpendicular wavenumber $k_\perp$ or the parallel wavenumber $k_\parallel$ with a Butterworth kernel $G^{(4)}(k)=1/[1+(k/k_*)^8]$. The key identities are the sub-filter terms $S_u=-T^{uu}:\nabla\tilde{u}$ and $S_\theta=-T^{\theta u}\cdot\nabla\tilde{\theta}$, which measure kinetic and potential energy transfer through the cutoff scale $\ell_*=1/k_*$, together with the filtered buoyancy flux $N\tilde{\theta}\tilde{w}$ that converts kinetic to potential energy. Because these terms are defined pointwise in physical space, they can be averaged inside subdomains selected by $|w/\sigma_w|$, which is what makes the local, draft-conditioned energy transfer accessible.

What would settle it

Recompute the draft-conditioned flux profiles using a sharply filtered spectral flux or a different filter kernel (e.g., Gaussian) at the same cutoff wavenumbers: if the sign reversal near $k_B$ along $k_\parallel$ and the bidirectional $\langle S_\theta\rangle$ around $k_\perp\approx 15$ disappear, or if the enhancement no longer tracks $|w/\sigma_w|$, the central claim is refuted. Additionally, if the fraction of points with $\mathrm{tr}[T^{uu}]<0$ is substantial inside the high-$|w|$ bins, those local fluxes are unreliable and the claim lacks support.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that extreme vertical velocity drafts are not passive markers of localized turbulence: they actively mediate the scale-by-scale energy budget. Conditional averages over bins of standardized vertical velocity $|w/\sigma_w|$ show that the sub-filter kinetic flux $\langle S_u\rangle$ and total flux $\langle S_{\mathrm{tot}}\rangle$ are increasingly forward (downscale) with draft intensity, peaking at $k_\perp\approx 15$, roughly twice the buoyancy wavenumber $k_B=N/U\approx 7$, and extending from the forcing scale up to the Ozmidov scale $k_{\mathrm{Oz}}\approx 42$. The potential-energy flux $\langle S_\theta\rangle$ becomes bidirectional in the same region, transferring potential energy simultaneously toward small and large scales, with the inversion at $k_\perp\approx 15$ coinciding with the maximum kinetic-to-potential conversion $N\langle \tilde{\theta}\tilde{w}\rangle$. Along the parallel direction, the total energy flux is negative (upscale) for $k_\parallel<k_B$ and positive (downscale) for $k_\parallel>k_B$ in draft regions, with the upscale branch about twice as intense as the forward branch. The magnitude of all these effects grows monotonically with $|w/\sigma_w|$ and essentially vanishes in the Gaussian core ($|w/\sigma_w|<2.5$), so the authors conclude that vertical drafts locally trigger upscale and downscale transfers and strengthen the coupling between kinetic and potential energies at scales set by the buoyancy length.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the pointwise sub-filter fluxes, averaged inside vertical-velocity bins, faithfully measure local cross-scale energy transfer; the paper validates this only for volume averages, on a weaker-turbulence run, and its Butterworth filter can produce negative pointwise sub-scale kinetic energy.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Within draft regions ($|w/\sigma_w|\ge 4$), kinetic and total energy are transferred forward at up to ten times the volume-average rate, so local cascade activity is far stronger than the global mean suggests.
  • Along $k_\parallel$, the total energy flux is upscale below $k_B\approx 7$ and downscale above it, meaning vertical drafts act as a bidirectional energy mediator around the buoyancy scale.
  • Along $k_\perp$, potential energy is transferred simultaneously toward large and small scales, with the sign change at $k_\perp\approx 15\approx 2k_B$ coinciding with peak kinetic-to-potential conversion.
  • The draft-conditioned enhancement grows monotonically with $|w/\sigma_w|$ and disappears for $|w/\sigma_w|<2.5$, showing the effect is tied to the extreme, non-Gaussian tail of the vertical velocity.
  • The refined anisotropic coarse-graining reproduces the volume-averaged isotropic, parallel, and perpendicular Fourier fluxes, validating it as a local proxy for the global spectral energy transfer.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An implication the authors leave implicit: if vertical drafts are local cascade switches, subgrid models used in weather and climate simulations might condition their eddy transfer coefficients on local vertical velocity or intermittency measures rather than on volume-averaged statistics.
  • Testable extension: the same conditional coarse-graining could be applied to observational velocities (ocean moorings, radar draft measurements) to look for the predicted sign reversal of the parallel flux at the buoyancy scale.
  • Because the effect vanishes in the Gaussian core and concentrates in about 0.6% of the volume, pointwise diagnostics of dissipation or mixing that ignore vertical-velocity conditioning will systematically underestimate the local transfer rate in draft regions.
  • The benchmark against Fourier fluxes was performed at $\mathrm{Re}\approx 97$ (Run I); applying the same volume-average comparison to a strongly intermittent run at higher Reynolds number would indicate whether the filter artifacts remain benign when the drafts are extreme.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper adapts the coarse-graining (space-filtering) method to the Boussinesq equations for stably stratified turbulence, deriving filtered kinetic, potential, and total energy equations with sub-filter-scale transfer terms and a kinetic-to-potential conversion term. The authors implement one-dimensional Butterworth filters to define parallel and perpendicular reduced fluxes, and validate the volume-averaged terms against classical Fourier fluxes for a moderately forced run. They then apply the method to a strongly intermittent run (Run II, Fr ≈ 0.08) and compute conditional averages of the local sub-filter fluxes in bins of the standardized vertical velocity |w/σ_w|. The central claim is that in regions of strong vertical drafts the kinetic and total energy fluxes are enhanced and forward at intermediate perpendicular scales, the potential energy flux becomes bidirectional around k⊥ ≈ 2k_B, and along the parallel direction the total flux is upscale for k∥ < k_B and downscale for k∥ > k_B. The paper also reports a temporal correlation between the vertical-velocity kurtosis and the volume-averaged flux modulation.

Significance. If the conditional results are robust, the paper provides a valuable local diagnostic for stratified turbulence and extends previous work on large-scale intermittency by connecting extreme vertical drafts to scale-to-scale energy transfer and kinetic-potential energy exchange. The derivation of the filtered Boussinesq equations is transparent and the volume-averaged comparison with Fourier fluxes is a genuine strength, as is the use of conditional statistics over many samples. The qualitative prediction that high-|w| regions host enhanced and bidirectional transfers is falsifiable and of interest for parameterizations of mixing and dissipation in geophysical flows. However, the causal wording of the abstract and conclusions goes beyond the correlational evidence, and the local validity of the pointwise flux estimates needs additional support before the central claim can be accepted as stated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. V and Sec. IV A] The main physical claim is built from conditional averages of pointwise sub-filter fluxes in Sec. V (Figs. 5 and 6), but the only quantitative benchmark in Sec. IV A (Fig. 2) validates volume-averaged terms, and only for Run I. The authors themselves note in Sec. III that the Butterworth filter can give pointwise tr[T^uu] < 0, and with one-dimensional filters the local flux at a point contains contributions from all scales in the unfiltered directions. It is therefore not possible to exclude a priori that filter artifacts are stronger in regions of large |w|, which could bias the reported amplification factors and sign inversions even though the global comparison is excellent. I ask for robustness tests directly on the quantities used in Sec. V: for example, recompute the draft-conditioned profiles with a different filter order or a different cutoff, check sensitivity to the binning in |w/σ_w|, and, if feasible, compare localized fluxes with a sharp-filter or local spectral estimate. This is a measurement-validity issue that is load-bearing for the central claim.
  2. [Abstract and Sec. VI] The abstract states that vertical drafts 'are indeed able to trigger upscale and downscale energy transfers', and Sec. VI says that drafts 'act as a mechanism for locally converting energy from kinetic to potential'. The evidence presented, however, consists of conditional averages over snapshots and a temporal correlation between the kurtosis K_w and volume-averaged fluxes (Fig. 7). These statistics establish association, not causation: the enhanced fluxes could be produced by the same dynamics that create the drafts, or by pre-existing large-scale strain, rather than by the drafts themselves. Please either soften the language to association ('are associated with', 'co-localize with') or provide a causal analysis such as time-lagged conditional fluxes or tracking of individual draft events. As written, the central claim overstates what the data can support.
  3. [Sec. IV A, Fig. 2] Equations (17) and (18) define the Fourier fluxes Π_u and Π_θ from the nonlinear advective transfer only. The 'conservative fluxes' Φ_u = S_u + N⟨θ̃w̃⟩ and Φ_θ = S_θ − N⟨θ̃w̃⟩, shown as red lines in Fig. 2, additionally include the kinetic-to-potential conversion term. Comparing these two quantities as if they were the same object is not apples-to-apples; indeed the text itself notes that the conversion term dominates at k⊥ ≳ 70, where the comparison cannot be expected to hold. I recommend comparing ⟨S_u⟩ directly with Π_u and ⟨S_θ⟩ directly with Π_θ, and plotting the cumulative buoyancy conversion separately if it is to be used as a budget term. This is needed to make the validation of the individual energy channels unambiguous.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Sec. IV A] The first sentence of Sec. IV A refers to 'a stably stratified flow Run II' but then identifies the simulation as Run I in Table I (kF = 20); this is a typo that should be corrected.
  2. [Sec. V A] The values ⟨ε_V⟩ ≈ 0.288 and ⟨ε_θ⟩ ≈ 0.024 are cited without a definition; please specify whether these are volume-averaged dissipation rates, transfer rates, or filtered energy budget terms.
  3. [Table I] The column labels in Table I are ambiguous ('k F', 'n p'); the caption should define every column, including the meaning of the grid-size entry and any parity or seed parameter.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the draft-conditioned flux statistics are measured DNS quantities benchmarked against Fourier fluxes, and the self-citations to prior intermittency work are contextual rather than load-bearing.

full rationale

The analysis chain is definitionally self-contained: the filtered energy equations (12)-(13) and the sub-scale fluxes S_u = -T^uu:∇ũ and S_θ = -T^θu·∇θ̃ are derived algebraically from the Boussinesq equations; no parameter is fitted to the conditional flux statistics. The central claim that strong vertical drafts coincide with enhanced forward kinetic transfer, bidirectional potential transfer, and an upscale/downscale parallel split is obtained by binning the measured pointwise flux fields on |w/σ_w|, not by constructing the fluxes from the conditioning variable. The method is independently benchmarked in Sec. IV A by comparing volume averages of S_tot, S_u, S_θ, and the conservative fluxes Φ against Fourier fluxes, with good agreement over the resolved range; this check, though performed on the lower-Re run, supports the implementation for the global quantities used later. Self-citations to Feraco et al. [17,26] and Marino et al. [29] select the simulation, the kurtosis peak windows, and the physical interpretation; they frame the analysis but do not enter the flux computation, so they are not load-bearing in a circular sense. The paper itself flags the main local-validity limitation: the Butterworth filter "may lead to point-wise negative values of the small-scales kinetic energy, defined as tr[T^uu] = g|u|^2 − |ũ|^2", and only volume-averaged fluxes are validated, so Sec. V's pointwise and subdomain values rest on an unvalidated local interpretation. That is a measurement-validity caveat, not a circular reduction: it affects whether the conditional numbers are physically meaningful, not whether they are derived from their own inputs. No equation or fitted quantity is reused as its own prediction, so the paper is not circular; the modest score reflects only the mild reliance on the authors' own prior intermittency criteria for run and window selection.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on a handful of statistical-analysis choices (bin edges, filter order, cutoff scales) and on the adequacy of the Boussinesq model and of local coarse-grained fluxes. Most of these are standard or validated in aggregate, but the causal interpretation and local validity are not independently established.

free parameters (2)
  • Vertical-velocity bin thresholds (units of σ_w) = 2.5, 3, 4, 6
    Hand-chosen cutoffs partitioning the domain into draft-strength classes (Sec. V, Table II). The conclusion that transfer intensity grows with |w/σ_w| depends on these bin edges; no sensitivity analysis is shown.
  • Butterworth filter order and cutoff scales = n=4; cutoffs at k=7 for renderings, and sweeps over k_⊥ and k_∥
    The filter shape and cutoff determine the pointwise flux values (Sec. III). The paper validates the volume-averaged fluxes for this filter choice but does not test sensitivity of the local results to n or k*.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Boussinesq equations represent stably stratified geophysical flows.
    All quantitative results come from DNS of Eqs. (1)-(2) (Secs. II, IV); the geophysical reach of the conclusions depends on this model's adequacy.
  • standard math Germano identity and the filtered energy budget (Eqs. (12)-(15)) hold for anisotropic 1D Butterworth filters.
    The derivation in Sec. III assumes the filter commutes with derivatives and that the sub-filter tensor decomposition is valid; no rigorous error bound is given for the 1D kernels.
  • domain assumption Volume-averaged sub-scale terms equal the reduced Fourier fluxes in stratified turbulence.
    Shown numerically for Run I (Fig. 2), and assumed for Run II and for the local subdomains used in Sec. V.
  • domain assumption Conditional statistics over w-bins are converged with the number of samples used.
    The authors state bins were chosen for convergent low-order moments (Sec. V) but give no convergence tests or error bars.
  • ad hoc to paper Correlation between high-|w| regions and enhanced fluxes implies a causal feedback from drafts.
    The abstract and Sec. VI use 'trigger' and 'act as a mechanism' without a causal (e.g., time-lagged or intervention) analysis.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Characterization of local energy transfer in large-scale intermittent stratified turbulent flows via coarse graining." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NFZZLTLN

@misc{pith2026241203384,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Characterization of local energy transfer in large-scale intermittent stratified turbulent flows via coarse graining},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NFZZLTLN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.03384}
}
read the original abstract

Recent studies based on simulations of the Boussinesq equations indicate that stratified turbulent flows can develop large-scale intermittency in the velocity and temperature fields, as detected in the atmosphere and oceans. In particular, emerging powerful vertical drafts were found to generate local turbulence, proving necessary for stratified flows to dissipate the energy as efficiently as homogeneous isotropic turbulent flows. The existence of regions characterized by enhanced turbulence and dissipation, as observed, for instance, in the ocean, requires appropriate tools to assess how energy is transferred across the scales and at the same time locally in the physical space. After refining a classical space-filtering procedure, here we investigate the feedback of extreme vertical velocity drafts on energy transfer and exchanges in subdomains of simulations of stably stratified flows of geophysical interest. Our analysis shows that vertical drafts are indeed able to trigger upscale and downscale energy transfers, strengthening the coupling between kinetic and potential energies at certain scales, depending on the intensity of the local vertical velocity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.03384 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematics of the channels resulting from the space-averaged energy equations for the filtered flux terms in Eqs. (14) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Panels (a)–(c): comparison between isotropic (left), parallel (center) and perpendicular (right) scale-to-scale Fourier [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Temporal evolution of kurtosis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Values larger than four standard deviations are highlighted in red (positive) and blue (negative) for the vertical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Kinetic (a), potential (b), total energy flux terms (c), and buoyancy flux (d) as a function of the filtering wave number [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Same as Fig. 5 for the vertically filtered quantity, here shown as a function of parallel wave numbers [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Cross-scale transfer along [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    sub-scale

    The coarse-graining analysis revealed that, in regions where powerful vertical velocity drafts develop, enhanced forward kinetic energy transfers are observed at large-intermediate scales – peaking at scale which is roughly half the buoyancy scale LB ∼ 1/kB (see Fig. 5) of the system – due to the coupling between the “sub-scale” turbulent (Reynolds) stres...

    work page

  2. [2]

    In the analyzed simulation, where no external forcing was applied to the (potential) temperature field, vertical velocity drafts act as a mechanism for locally converting energy from kinetic to potential, both along the vertical and horizontal directions in the spectral space; this conversion is mediated by the buoyancy nonlinearity N ⟨θw⟩ that couples ve...

    work page

  3. [3]

    EVENTFUL

    Along the parallel direction in Fourier space ( k∥), a bi-directional total energy transfer, developing around the buoyancy scale kB = N/U ≈ 7, is associated with the strongest vertical velocity drafts ( |w/σw| > 2.5). For k < kB the total energy flux appears indeed to be negative (corresponding to an upscale transfer) and almost twice as intense as the f...

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    J. C. McWilliams, Fluid dynamics at the margin of rotational control, Environmental Fluid Mechanics 8, 441–449 (2008)

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    J. P. Laval, J. C. McWilliams, and B. Dubrulle, Forced stratified turbulence: Successive transitions with Reynolds number, Phys. Rev. E 68, 036308 (2003), arXiv:physics/0304080 [physics.flu-dyn]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2003

  6. [6]

    Alexakis, R

    A. Alexakis, R. Marino, P. D. Mininni, A. van Kan, R. Foldes, and F. Feraco, Large-scale self-organization in dry turbulent atmospheres, Science 383, 1005 (2024)

    2024

  7. [7]

    Large-scale anisotropy in stably stratified rotating flows

    R. Marino, P. D. Mininni, D. L. Rosenberg, and A. Pouquet, Large-scale anisotropy in stably stratified rotating flows, Phys. Rev. E 90, 023018 (2014), arXiv:1407.4580 [physics.flu-dyn]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2014

  8. [8]

    Lindborg, The energy cascade in a strongly stratified fluid, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 550, 207–242 (2006)

    E. Lindborg, The energy cascade in a strongly stratified fluid, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 550, 207–242 (2006)

    work page 2006

Show all 73 references
  1. [9]

    Marino, P

    R. Marino, P. D. Mininni, D. Rosenberg, and A. Pouquet, Inverse cascades in rotating stratified turbulence: Fast growth of large scales, EPL (Europhysics Letters) 102, 44006 (2013)

    2013

  2. [10]

    Pouquet and R

    A. Pouquet and R. Marino, Geophysical turbulence and the duality of the energy flow across scales, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 234501 (2013)

    2013

  3. [11]

    Marino, A

    R. Marino, A. Pouquet, and D. Rosenberg, Resolving the paradox of oceanic large-scale balance and small-scale mixing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 114504 (2015)

    2015

  4. [12]

    Balwada, J.-H

    D. Balwada, J.-H. Xie, R. Marino, and F. Feraco, Direct observational evidence of an oceanic dual kinetic energy cascade and its seasonality, Science Advances 8, eabq2566 (2022)

    2022

  5. [13]

    Billant and J.-M

    P. Billant and J.-M. Chomaz, Experimental evidence for a new instability of a vertical columnar vortex pair in a strongly stratified fluid, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 418, 167 (2000)

    2000

  6. [14]

    Khani and M

    S. Khani and M. L. Waite, Large eddy simulations of stratified turbulence: the dynamic Smagorinsky model, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 773, 327–344 (2015). 16

    2015

  7. [15]

    Khani and M

    S. Khani and M. L. Waite, An anisotropic subgrid-scale parameterization for large-eddy simulations of stratified turbulence, Monthly Weather Review 148, 4299 (2020)

    2020

  8. [16]

    Rosenberg, A

    D. Rosenberg, A. Pouquet, R. Marino, and P. D. Mininni, Evidence for Bolgiano-Obukhov scaling in rotat- ing stratified turbulence using high-resolution direct numerical simulations, Physics of Fluids 27, 055105 (2015), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/pof/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1.492...

    2015 doi

  9. [17]

    S. M. de Bruyn Kops, Classical scaling and intermittency in strongly stratified Boussinesq turbulence, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 775, 436–463 (2015)

    2015

  10. [18]

    Petropoulos, M

    N. Petropoulos, M. M. Couchman, A. Mashayek, S. M. de Bruyn Kops, and C.-c. P. Caulfield, Prandtl number effects on extreme mixing events in forced stratified turbulence, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 983, R1 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    Rorai, P

    C. Rorai, P. D. Mininni, and A. Pouquet, Turbulence comes in bursts in stably stratified flows, Phys. Rev. E 89, 043002 (2014), arXiv:1308.6564 [physics.flu-dyn]

    2014 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Feraco, R

    F. Feraco, R. Marino, A. Pumir, L. Primavera, P. D. Mininni, A. Pouquet, and D. Rosenberg, Vertical drafts and mixing in stratified turbulence: Sharp transition with froude number, Europhysics Letters 123, 44002 (2018)

    2018

  13. [21]

    Mahrt, Intermittent of Atmospheric Turbulence., Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 46, 79 (1989)

    L. Mahrt, Intermittent of Atmospheric Turbulence., Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 46, 79 (1989)

    1989

  14. [22]

    R. Lyu, F. Hu, L. Liu, J. Xu, and X. Cheng, High-order statistics of temperature fluctuations in an unstable atmospheric surface layer over grassland, Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 35, 1265 (2018)

    2018

  15. [23]

    Rodriguez Imazio, A

    P. Rodriguez Imazio, A. D¨ ornbrack, R. D. Urzua, N. Rivaben, and A. Godoy, Clear Air Turbulence Observed Across a Tropopause Fold Over the Drake Passage—A Case Study, Journal of Geophysical Research (Atmospheres) 127, e2021JD035908 (2022)

    2022

  16. [24]

    J. L. Chau, R. Marino, F. Feraco, J. M. Urco, G. Baumgarten, F. J. L¨ ubken, W. K. Hocking, C. Schult, T. Renkwitz, and R. Latteck, Radar Observation of Extreme Vertical Drafts in the Polar Summer Mesosphere, Geophysical Research Letters 48, e94918 (2021)

    2021

  17. [25]

    E. A. D’Asaro, R.-C. Lien, and F. Henyey, High-Frequency Internal Waves on the Oregon Continental Shelf, Journal of Physical Oceanography 37, 1956 (2007)

    2007

  18. [26]

    L. F. Burlaga, Intermittent turbulence in the solar wind, Journal of Geophysical Research 96, 5847 (1991)

    1991

  19. [27]

    Sorriso-Valvo, R

    L. Sorriso-Valvo, R. Marino, L. Lijoi, S. Perri, and V. Carbone, Self-consistent castaing distribution of solar wind turbulent fluctuations, The Astrophysical Journal 807, 86 (2015)

    2015

  20. [28]

    A. N. Kolmogorov, A refinement of previous hypotheses concerning the local structure of turbulence in a viscous incom- pressible fluid at high reynolds number, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 13, 82–85 (1962)

    1962

  21. [29]

    Feraco, R

    F. Feraco, R. Marino, L. Primavera, A. Pumir, P. D. Mininni, D. Rosenberg, A. Pouquet, R. Foldes, E. L´ evˆ eque, E. Cam- poreale, S. S. Cerri, H. Charuvil Asokan, J. L. Chau, J. P. Bertoglio, P. Salizzoni, and M. Marro, Connecting large-scale velocity and temperature bursts w...

    2021 arXiv

  22. [30]

    N. E. Sujovolsky, G. B. Mindlin, and P. D. Mininni, Invariant manifolds in stratified turbulence, Phys. Rev. Fluids 4, 052402 (2019)

    2019

  23. [31]

    N. E. Sujovolsky and P. D. Mininni, From waves to convection and back again: The phase space of stably stratified turbulence, Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 064802 (2020)

    2020

  24. [32]

    Marino, F

    R. Marino, F. Feraco, L. Primavera, A. Pumir, A. Pouquet, D. Rosenberg, and P. D. Mininni, Turbulence generation by large-scale extreme vertical drafts and the modulation of local energy dissipation in stably stratified geophysical flows, Physical Review Fluids 7, 033801 (2022...

    2022 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Pouquet, D

    A. Pouquet, D. Rosenberg, R. Marino, and C. Herbert, Scaling laws for mixing and dissipation in unforced rotating stratified turbulence, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 844, 519–545 (2018)

    2018

  26. [34]

    Pouquet, D

    A. Pouquet, D. Rosenberg, and R. Marino, Linking dissipation, anisotropy, and intermittency in rotating stratified turbu- lence at the threshold of linear shear instabilities, Physics of Fluids 31, 105116 (2019)

    2019

  27. [35]

    Pearson and B

    B. Pearson and B. Fox-Kemper, Log-normal turbulence dissipation in global ocean models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 094501 (2018)

    2018

  28. [36]

    Isern-Fontanet and A

    J. Isern-Fontanet and A. Turiel, On the connection between intermittency and dissipation in ocean turbulence: A multi- fractal approach, Journal of Physical Oceanography 51, 2639 (2021)

    2021

  29. [37]

    G. L. Eyink and H. Aluie, Localness of energy cascade in hydrodynamic turbulence. I. Smooth coarse graining, Physics of Fluids 21, 115107 (2009)

    2009

  30. [38]

    Aluie and G

    H. Aluie and G. L. Eyink, Scale locality of magnetohydrodynamic turbulence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 081101 (2010)

    2010

  31. [39]

    Camporeale, L

    E. Camporeale, L. Sorriso-Valvo, F. Califano, and A. Retin` o, Coherent Structures and Spectral Energy Transfer in Tur- bulent Plasma: A Space-Filter Approach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 125101 (2018), arXiv:1711.00291 [physics.plasm-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Aluie, M

    H. Aluie, M. Hecht, and G. K. Vallis, Mapping the Energy Cascade in the North Atlantic Ocean: The Coarse-Graining Approach, Journal of Physical Oceanography 48, 225 (2018), arXiv:1710.07963 [physics.flu-dyn]

    2018 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Buzzicotti, B

    M. Buzzicotti, B. A. Storer, S. M. Griffies, and H. Aluie, A coarse-grained decomposition of surface geostrophic kinetic energy in the global ocean, Earth and Space Science Open Archive , 58 (2021)

    2021

  34. [42]

    Aluie and S

    H. Aluie and S. Kurien, Joint downscale fluxes of energy and potential enstrophy in rotating stratified boussinesq flows, EPL (Europhysics Letters) 96, 44006 (2011)

    2011

  35. [43]

    Zhou, Threshold behavior of local gradient Richardson number in strongly stratified nonequilibrium turbulence, Phys

    Q. Zhou, Threshold behavior of local gradient Richardson number in strongly stratified nonequilibrium turbulence, Phys. Rev. Fluids 7, 104802 (2022)

    2022

  36. [44]

    Zhou, Mixing in a strongly stratified turbulent wake quantified by bulk and conditional statistics, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 997, A41 (2024)

    Q. Zhou, Mixing in a strongly stratified turbulent wake quantified by bulk and conditional statistics, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 997, A41 (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    She and E

    Z.-S. She and E. Leveque, Universal scaling laws in fully developed turbulence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 336 (1994). 17

    1994

  38. [46]

    Pouquet, D

    A. Pouquet, D. Rosenberg, R. Marino, and P. Mininni, Intermittency scaling for mixing and dissipation in rotating stratified turbulence at the edge of instability, Atmosphere 14, 10.3390/atmos14091375 (2023)

    2023 doi

  39. [47]

    Aluie and G

    H. Aluie and G. L. Eyink, Localness of energy cascade in hydrodynamic turbulence. II. Sharp spectral filter, Physics of Fluids 21, 115108 (2009), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/pof/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1.3266948/16021293/115108 1 online.pdf

    2009 doi

  40. [48]

    Leonard, Energy cascade in large-eddy simulations of turbulent fluid flows, in Turbulent Diffusion in Environmental Pollution , Advances in Geophysics, Vol

    A. Leonard, Energy cascade in large-eddy simulations of turbulent fluid flows, in Turbulent Diffusion in Environmental Pollution , Advances in Geophysics, Vol. 18, edited by F. Frenkiel and R. Munn (Elsevier, 1975) pp. 237–248

    1975

  41. [49]

    Germano, Turbulence - The filtering approach, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 238, 325 (1992)

    M. Germano, Turbulence - The filtering approach, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 238, 325 (1992)

    1992

  42. [50]

    Meneveau and J

    C. Meneveau and J. Katz, Scale-invariance and turbulence models for large-eddy simulation, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 32, 1 (2000)

    2000

  43. [51]

    Hellinger, A

    P. Hellinger, A. Verdini, S. Landi, E. Papini, L. Franci, and L. Matteini, Scale dependence and cross-scale transfer of kinetic energy in compressible hydrodynamic turbulence at moderate Reynolds numbers, Physical Review Fluids 6, 044607 (2021), arXiv:2103.12005 [physics.flu-dyn]

    2021 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Y. Yang, W. H. Matthaeus, T. N. Parashar, C. C. Haggerty, V. Roytershteyn, W. Daughton, M. Wan, Y. Shi, and S. Chen, Energy transfer, pressure tensor, and heating of kinetic plasma, Physics of Plasmas 24, 072306 (2017), arXiv:1705.02054 [physics.plasm-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  45. [53]

    S. S. Cerri and E. Camporeale, Space-filter techniques for quasi-neutral hybrid-kinetic models, Physics of Plasmas 27, 082102 (2020), arXiv:2005.03130 [physics.plasm-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Manzini, F

    D. Manzini, F. Sahraoui, F. Califano, and R. Ferrand, Local energy transfer and dissipation in incompressible Hall magnetohydrodynamic turbulence: The coarse-graining approach, Phys. Rev. E 106, 035202 (2022), arXiv:2203.01050 [physics.plasm-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Manzini, F

    D. Manzini, F. Sahraoui, and F. Califano, Subion-Scale Turbulence Driven by Magnetic Reconnection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 205201 (2023), arXiv:2208.00855 [physics.plasm-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  48. [56]

    De Leo and A

    A. De Leo and A. Stocchino, Evidence of transient energy and enstrophy cascades in tidal flows: A scale to scale analysis, Geophysical Research Letters 49, e2022GL098043 (2022)

    2022

  49. [57]

    Khatri, S

    H. Khatri, S. Griffies, B. Storer, M. Buzzicotti, H. Aluie, M. Sonnewald, R. Dussin, and A. Shao, A scale-dependent analysis of the barotropic vorticity budget in a global ocean simulation, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems 16 (2024)

    2024

  50. [58]

    Aluie, Coarse-grained incompressible magnetohydrodynamics: analyzing the turbulent cascades, New Journal of Physics 19, 025008 (2017)

    H. Aluie, Coarse-grained incompressible magnetohydrodynamics: analyzing the turbulent cascades, New Journal of Physics 19, 025008 (2017)

    2017

  51. [59]

    D. Zhao, R. Betti, and H. Aluie, Scale interactions and anisotropy in Rayleigh–Taylor turbulence, Journal of Fluid Me- chanics 930, A29 (2022)

    2022

  52. [60]

    Zhao and H

    D. Zhao and H. Aluie, Measuring scale-dependent shape anisotropy by coarse-graining: Application to inhomogeneous rayleigh-taylor turbulence, Phys. Rev. Fluids 8, 114601 (2023)

    2023

  53. [61]

    Billant and J.-M

    P. Billant and J.-M. Chomaz, Self-similarity of strongly stratified inviscid flows, Physics of Fluids 13, 1645 (2001)

    2001

  54. [62]

    P. D. Mininni, D. Rosenberg, R. Reddy, and A. Pouquet, A hybrid mpi–openmp scheme for scalable parallel pseudospectral computations for fluid turbulence, Parallel Computing 37, 316 (2011)

    2011

  55. [63]

    Rosenberg, P

    D. Rosenberg, P. D. Mininni, R. Reddy, and A. Pouquet, Gpu parallelization of a hybrid pseudospectral geophysical turbulence framework using cuda, Atmosphere 11, 10.3390/atmos11020178 (2020)

    2020 doi

  56. [64]

    M. K. Rivera, H. Aluie, and R. E. Ecke, The direct enstrophy cascade of two-dimensional soap film flows, Physics of Fluids 26, 055105 (2014), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/pof/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1.4873579/13937063/055105 1 online.pdf

    2014 doi

  57. [65]

    Holloway, The buoyancy flux from internal gravity wave breaking, Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans12, 107 (1988)

    G. Holloway, The buoyancy flux from internal gravity wave breaking, Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans12, 107 (1988)

    1988

  58. [66]

    Staquet and F

    C. Staquet and F. S. Godeferd, Statistical modelling and direct numerical simulations of decaying stably stratified turbu- lence. part 1. flow energetics, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 360, 295–340 (1998)

    1998

  59. [67]

    G. F. Carnevale, M. Briscolini, and P. Orlandi, Buoyancy- to inertial-range transition in forced stratified turbulence, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 427, 205–239 (2001)

    2001

  60. [68]

    Brethouwer, P

    G. Brethouwer, P. Billant, E. Lindborg, and J.-M. Chomaz, Scaling analysis and simulation of strongly stratified turbulent flows, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 585, 343–368 (2007)

    2007

  61. [69]

    Gallon, A

    S. Gallon, A. Sozza, F. Feraco, R. Marino, and A. Pumir, Lagrangian Irreversibility and Energy Exchanges in Rotating- Stratified Turbulent Flows, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 024101 (2024), arXiv:2401.14779 [physics.flu-dyn]

    2024 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Y. Yang, W. H. Matthaeus, Y. Shi, M. Wan, and S. Chen, Compressibility effect on coherent structures, energy transfer, and scaling in magnetohydrodynamic turbulence, Physics of Fluids 29, 035105 (2017)

    2017

  63. [71]

    Y. Yang, M. Wan, W. H. Matthaeus, L. Sorriso-Valvo, T. N. Parashar, Q. Lu, Y. Shi, and S. Chen, Scale dependence of energy transfer in turbulent plasma, Mon. Not. Royal Astron. Soc. 482, 4933 (2019)

    2019

  64. [72]

    Foldes, S

    R. Foldes, S. S. Cerri, R. Marino, and E. Camporeale, Evidence of dual energy transfer driven by magnetic reconnection at subion scales, Phys. Rev. E 110, 055207 (2024)

    2024

  65. [73]

    Alexakis and S

    A. Alexakis and S. Chibbaro, Local energy flux of turbulent flows, Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 094604 (2020)

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.