Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 52 references

Frequency-tunable biphoton generation via spontaneous four-wave mixing

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Detuning the coupling field in a backward double-Λ spontaneous four-wave-mixing source tunes the biphoton frequency, and increasing the coupling power recovers the degraded pairing ratio and generation rate.

desk verdict Useful experimental study of frequency-tunable biphotons in backward SFWM, with a real caveat about the phase-mismatch model. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.04127 v1 pith:NBNBLCNG submitted 2024-12-05 quant-ph physics.atom-phphysics.optics

Jiun-Shiuan Shiu , Chang-Wei Lin , Yu-Chiao Huang , Meng-Jung Lin , I-Chia Huang , Ting-Ho Wu , Pei-Chen Kuan , Yong-Fan Chen This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phphysics.atom-phphysics.optics
keywords spontaneousfour-wavemixingbiphotonelectromagneticallyinducedtransparencyfrequencytunabilitypairingratiocoldrubidiumatomsphasemismatchquantumcommunication
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports an experimental study of frequency-tunable biphoton generation in a backward double-Λ spontaneous four-wave-mixing (SFWM) source using cold rubidium atoms. By detuning the coupling field that drives the EIT-based conversion, the authors shift the anti-Stokes photon frequency through the two-photon resonance condition, achieving tunability up to $3\Gamma$ (18 MHz). Detuning weakens the EIT-based stimulated FWM, lowering both the pairing ratio and the biphoton generation rate, but increasing the coupling field power mitigates this loss so the correlated-pair rate $R_B r_p$ is nearly preserved. The authors also observe that blue- and red-detuning produce asymmetric biphoton wavepackets, an effect they attribute to the residual geometric phase mismatch $\Delta k L$, and they predict that scaling the coupling Rabi frequency proportionally to the detuning extends the tunable range while maintaining performance.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the Heisenberg–Langevin solution of the Maxwell–Schrödinger equations for the backward-propagating Stokes and anti-Stokes fields coupled to collective atomic coherences. The transfer-matrix solution separates the stimulated-FWM contribution (correlated pairs) from spontaneous Raman noise (uncorrelated scatter), which defines the pairing ratio $r_p$. The biphoton wavepacket is the normalized second-order correlation $g^{(2)}(\tau)$, and its delay is set by two times: the EIT group delay $\tau_{\rm EIT} = \Gamma \mathrm{OD}/|\Omega_c|^2$ and the damped Rabi oscillation period $\tau_R = 2\pi/\sqrt{|\Omega_c|^2 - \Gamma^2/4}$. The detuning $\Delta_c$ enters through the two-photon resonance condition, while the geometric phase mismatch $\Delta k L$ enters the propagation equation and is responsible for the predicted and observed blue/red asymmetry in the wavepacket delay.

What would settle it

Measure the biphoton delay-time curve and the blue/red asymmetry for detunings extending beyond $\pm 3\Gamma$ (for example to $\pm 10\Gamma$) and compare with the fixed-$\Delta k L$ model; a systematic deviation would show that dispersive phase mismatch is significant and that the $\Omega_c \propto |\Delta_c|$ scaling rule overestimates the usable tuning range.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central result is that the built-in EIT of a double-Λ scheme can serve as a frequency-tuning knob for biphotons: setting the coupling field detuning $\Delta_c$ shifts the two-photon resonance to $\bar{\omega}_{\rm as} = \omega_{21} + \omega_c = \omega_{41} + \Delta_c$, so the anti-Stokes photon frequency follows the coupling laser. This detuning degrades the EIT-assisted stimulated FWM process that establishes temporal correlations, which appears as a reduction in the pairing ratio $r_p$ and in the biphoton generation rate $R_B$. The performance loss is not fundamental: raising the coupling Rabi frequency $\Omega_c$ from $1\Gamma$ to $2\Gamma$ slows the decline of $r_p$ and $R_B$, and the correlated-pair rate $R_B r_p$ stays nearly flat across the measured tuning range. The temporal profile of the biphoton wavepacket becomes asymmetric between blue- and red-detuning, with different delay times, because the backward configuration has a geometric phase mismatch $\Delta k L = 0.37\pi$; in a perfectly phase-matched forward scheme this asymmetry would be absent. The model further predicts that preserving performance at a detuning $n$ times larger requires increasing $\Omega_c$ proportionally, which projects a tunable range of $30\Gamma$ (180 MHz) at $\Omega_c = 20\Gamma$.

Load-bearing premise

The theoretical model assumes a fixed, purely geometric phase mismatch $\Delta k L = 0.37\pi$ that does not depend on frequency detuning or on medium dispersion.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A double-Λ SFWM biphoton source can be frequency-tuned on demand, with a demonstrated tuning range of $\pm 3\Gamma$ (18 MHz).
  • Increasing the coupling Rabi frequency to $2\Gamma$ keeps the correlated-pair rate $R_B r_p$ nearly constant across the tuning range, even though the bare pairing ratio and generation rate decline.
  • The measured delay-versus-detuning curve is sensitive to the medium's phase mismatch and length, so it can be used to determine $L$ from a single set of wavepacket measurements.
  • The linear scaling $\Omega_c \propto |\Delta_c|$ gives a practical recipe to extend the tunable range, projecting $30\Gamma$ (180 MHz) at $\Omega_c = 20\Gamma$ while preserving performance.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the fixed-geometric phase-mismatch model holds, the same tuning mechanism and the same blue/red asymmetry should appear in other non-forward SFWM geometries, making the asymmetry a general diagnostic of residual phase mismatch in narrowband biphoton sources.
  • The linear scaling rule carries an implicit cost constraint: at very large $\Omega_c$ the EIT transmission window broadens and the biphoton linewidth grows, so the usable tuning range in practice may be limited by the acceptable bandwidth rather than by coupling power alone; a test at $\Omega_c \gtrsim 10\Gamma$ could reveal where this tradeoff sets in.
  • Because detuning sacrifices pairing ratio, a frequency-tunable source used as a quantum-memory interface would likely operate at a nonzero detuning only when the memory's acceptance bandwidth demands it; the $r_p$-versus-$\Delta_c$ curves here give a quantitative basis for choosing that operating point.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports experiments on frequency-tunable biphoton generation via backward double-Lambda spontaneous four-wave mixing (SFWM) in cold 87Rb atoms. By detuning the coupling field by Δc, the anti-Stokes (and hence biphoton) frequency is tuned over ±3Γ (18 MHz). The authors find that increasing |Δc| reduces the pairing ratio rp and the biphoton generation rate RB, but that increasing the coupling Rabi frequency Ωc from Γ to 2Γ mitigates this reduction. They also observe an asymmetry in the temporal wavepackets for blue versus red detuning, which they attribute to a constant geometric phase mismatch ΔkL = 0.37π. A Heisenberg-Langevin model from earlier work is used to compute RB, rp, and g^(2), and the data are compared with model curves. No error bars or statistical analysis are presented; the agreement is visual.

Significance. If the claims are correct, this is a useful demonstration of a tunable narrowband biphoton source with a concrete prescription (Ωc ∝ |Δc|) for extending tunability. The theoretical treatment is not circular: the model is taken from Refs. [19,20], and OD, γ21, and collection efficiencies are reported as independently measured. The phase-mismatch asymmetry is a falsifiable prediction, and the comparison of two coupling powers provides a genuine experimental test. The main caveats are that the dispersion-dependence of the phase mismatch is not validated and that the quantitative agreement is not supported by uncertainties. These caveats do not undermine the value of the data, but they limit how strongly the extrapolated scaling law can be claimed.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. IV, Fig. 2 caption and Eq. (2)] The model treats ΔkL as a fixed geometric quantity (ΔkL = 0.37π), and the Fig. 2 caption explicitly states that this does not take into account the dispersion effects of the medium. Because the blue/red asymmetry in Figs. 2 and 3 and the extrapolated prescription Ωc ∝ |Δc| at the end of Sec. IV are generated by this constant-Δk term, the manuscript needs either a measured Δk(Δc) or a quantitative bound showing that dispersion contributes negligibly over the ±3Γ range. Without this, the attribution of the asymmetry to phase mismatch and the quantitative scaling law are not yet established.
  2. [Sec. IV, Figs. 2-5] No error bars, confidence intervals, or goodness-of-fit statistics are provided for the experimental data points or for the extracted quantities τdelay, rp, and RB. The central claim of agreement rests on visual overlay of the theoretical curves. Please provide uncertainties and at least a simple quantitative agreement metric, since the claimed agreement is the basis for both the model validation and the comparison between the Ωc = 1Γ and Ωc = 2Γ regimes.
  3. [Sec. III B, Eq. (7)] The environmental background rate Renv is said to be 'determined by experimental measurements,' but the procedure is not described in this manuscript and is deferred to the supplemental material of Ref. [20]. Since RB and rp are obtained by subtracting Renv, the sensitivity of the extracted quantities to the Renv estimate should be stated, or the measurement procedure should be summarized.
  4. [End of Sec. IV] The claim that increasing Ωc by a factor n preserves biphoton performance when |Δc| increases by the same factor is an extrapolation of the model beyond the tested range (Ωc up to 2Γ, |Δc| up to 3Γ). It should be explicitly labeled as a model prediction rather than an experimental result, and the linear dependence should be derived or benchmarked against a case with larger Ωc or |Δc|. As written, the statement is stronger than the data support.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. III B] The phrase 'a total of 2 18 receptions' appears to be a typesetting error for 2^18; please correct it.
  2. [Figs. 2-5] The symbol convention for experimental data is inconsistent: Fig. 2 and Fig. 4 use filled circles while Fig. 3 and Fig. 5 use hollow circles. Please use a single consistent legend across all figures.
  3. [Sec. II] The sentence about injection locking and synchronization (referring to Ref. [38]) is awkwardly phrased; consider rewriting it as 'More details can be found in Ref. [38], which uses the same arrangement.'
  4. [Sec. IV] The expressions for τR and τEIT are stated to be valid only for a resonant coupling field, but no detuned expressions are given. A brief statement of the exact definitions used in the detuned model would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: model is external, parameters are independently fixed, and the detuning asymmetry and Ωc scaling are genuine predictions.

full rationale

The central chain is not circular. The theoretical model (Eqs. (1)-(6)) is taken from Kolchin [19], an external theory paper, and from the authors' earlier experimental paper [20] only for supplemental technical detail, not as the source of the predicted effect. The comparison observables—biphoton wavepackets, τdelay, pairing ratio rp, generation rate RB, and RBrp—are measured by time-of-flight coincidence counting, while all model inputs are fixed independently: OD=10, Ωd=1Γ, Ωc=1Γ or 2Γ, Δd=10Γ, γ21=0.001Γ from a separate Λ-EIT experiment, collection efficiencies from optical-transmission measurements, and ΔkL=0.37π computed geometrically from L=4 mm. In particular, ΔkL is not adjusted to make the asymmetry appear; Figs. 3 and 5 compare fixed ΔkL=0.37π predictions with ΔkL=0 and 0.74π curves, and the red-detuning/blue-detuning asymmetry is a prediction of that constant-Δk model. The Ωc proportional to |Δc| scaling in Sec. IV is likewise an extrapolation of the same independent model, not a fit to the points. Self-citations (e.g., [20]) are normal references to prior methods and do not serve as load-bearing justification that forbids alternatives. The one caveat—"the phase mismatch here is related only to the geometric arrangement ... and does not take into account the dispersion effects of the medium" (Fig. 2 caption, Sec. IV)—is an honest limitation on quantitative accuracy (a correctness risk), not a circularity: it does not make any predicted quantity equivalent to a fitted input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model relies on standard quantum optics frameworks and measured input parameters (OD, Omega_d, Omega_c, gamma_21, efficiencies). No parameters are fitted to the biphoton data, which keeps the central claim independent of circular fitting. The main simplifying assumption is the dispersion-free constant phase mismatch.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Heisenberg-Langevin and Maxwell-Schrodinger equations describe biphoton generation in the double-Lambda system (Eqs. 1-6).
    Adopted from Kolchin (2007) and the authors' previous work, providing the field-operator solution used throughout.
  • domain assumption Two-photon resonance condition omega_as = omega_21 + omega_c holds when tuning the anti-Stokes frequency.
    Used in Sec. IV to relate coupling detuning delta_c to biphoton frequency shift.
  • ad hoc to paper Phase mismatch is constant and geometric (delta_k L = 0.37 pi), ignoring medium dispersion.
    Stated in Sec. IV and Fig. 2 caption; this simplification is central to the asymmetry prediction.
  • domain assumption Atoms are cold (300 micro-K) and stationary over the 10-micro-s pulse, so Doppler broadening is negligible.
    Sec. II experimental setup; enables the model's treatment of atomic coherences.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Frequency-tunable biphoton generation via spontaneous four-wave mixing." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NBNBLCNG

@misc{pith2026241204127,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Frequency-tunable biphoton generation via spontaneous four-wave mixing},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NBNBLCNG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.04127}
}
abstract

We present experimental results on tuning biphoton frequency by introducing a detuned coupling field in spontaneous four-wave mixing (SFWM), and examine its impact on the pairing ratio. This tunability is achieved by manipulating the inherent electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT) effect in the double-$\Lambda$ scheme. Introducing a detuned coupling field degrades the efficiency of EIT-based stimulated four-wave mixing, which in turn reduces the biphoton pairing ratio. However, this reduction can be mitigated by increasing the optical power of the coupling field. Additionally, we observe that blue- and red-detuning the biphoton frequency results in distinct temporal profiles of biphoton wavepackets due to phase mismatch. These findings provide insights into the mechanisms of frequency-tunable biphoton generation via SFWM, and suggest potential optimizations for applications in quantum communication and information processing.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.04127 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The diagram illustrates the double-Λ SFWM system [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The asymmetry in biphoton wavepackets under the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The results for frequency-tunable biphotons under [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The results for frequency-tunable biphotons under [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [20]

    Shiu, Z.-Y

    J.-S. Shiu, Z.-Y. Liu, C.-Y. Cheng, Y.-C. Huang, I. A. Yu, Y.-C. Chen, C.-S. Chuu, C.-M. Li, S.-Y. Wang, and Y.-F. Chen, Observation of highly correlated ultrabright bipho- tons through increased atomic ensemble density in spon- taneous four-wave mixing, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, L032001 (2024)

    2024

  2. [1]

    Bali´ c, D

    V. Bali´ c, D. A. Braje, P. Kolchin, G. Y. Yin, and S. E. Harris, Generation of paired photons with controllable waveforms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 183601 (2005)

    work page 2005

  3. [2]

    Chaneli` ere, D

    T. Chaneli` ere, D. N. Matsukevich, S. D. Jenkins, T. A. B. Kennedy, M. S. Chapman, and A. Kuzmich, Quantum telecommunication based on atomic cascade transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 093604 (2006)

    work page 2006

  4. [3]

    J. K. Thompson, J. Simon, H. Loh, and V. Vuleti´ c, A high-brightness source of narrowband, identical-photon pairs, Science 313, 74 (2006)

    work page 2006

  5. [4]

    S. Du, P. Kolchin, C. Belthangady, G. Y. Yin, and S. E. Harris, Subnatural linewidth biphotons with controllable temporal length, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 183603 (2008)

    work page 2008

  6. [5]

    Lee, K.-K

    J.-C. Lee, K.-K. Park, T.-M. Zhao, and Y.-H. Kim, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen entanglement of narrow-band photons from cold atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 250501 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [6]

    J. Park, H. Kim, and H. S. Moon, Polarization-entangled photons from a warm atomic ensemble using a Sagnac interferometer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 143601 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [7]

    Hsu, Y.-S

    C.-Y. Hsu, Y.-S. Wang, J.-M. Chen, F.-C. Huang, Y.-T. Ke, E. K. Huang, W. Hung, K.-L. Chao, S.-S. Hsiao, Y.- H. Chen, C.-S. Chuu, Y.-C. Chen, Y.-F. Chen, and I. A. Yu, Generation of sub-MHz and spectrally-bright bipho- tons from hot atomic vapors with a phase mismatch-free scheme, Opt. Express 29, 4632 (2021)

    work page 2021

Show all 52 references
  1. [8]

    M. O. Ara´ ujo, L. S. Marinho, and D. Felinto, Observation of nonclassical correlations in biphotons generated from an ensemble of pure two-level atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 083601 (2022)

    2022

  2. [9]

    Bruns, C.-Y

    A. Bruns, C.-Y. Hsu, S. Stryzhenko, E. Giese, L. P. Yat- senko, I. A. Yu, T. Halfmann, and T. Peters, Ultrabright and narrowband intra-fiber biphoton source at ultralow pump power, Quantum Sci. Technol. 8, 015002 (2023)

    2023

  3. [10]

    L.-M. Duan, M. D. Lukin, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Long- distance quantum communication with atomic ensembles and linear optics, Nat. 414, 413 (2001)

    2001

  4. [11]

    C. H. van der Wal, M. D. Eisaman, A. Andr´ e, R. L. Walsworth, D. F. Phillips, A. S. Zibrov, and M. D. Lukin, Atomic memory for correlated photon states, Science 301, 196 (2003)

    2003

  5. [12]

    C. W. Chou, S. V. Polyakov, A. Kuzmich, and H. J. Kim- ble, Single-photon generation from stored excitation in an atomic ensemble, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 213601 (2004)

    2004

  6. [13]

    D. N. Matsukevich and A. Kuzmich, Quantum state transfer between matter and light, Science 306, 663 (2004)

    2004

  7. [14]

    M. D. Eisaman, L. Childress, A. Andr´ e, F. Massou, A. S. Zibrov, and M. D. Lukin, Shaping quantum pulses of light via coherent atomic memory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 233602 (2004)

    2004

  8. [15]

    Sangouard, C

    N. Sangouard, C. Simon, H. de Riedmatten, and N. Gisin, Quantum repeaters based on atomic ensembles and linear optics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 33 (2011)

    2011

  9. [16]

    Y.-F. Pu, N. Jiang, W. Chang, H.-X. Yang, C. Li, and L.-M. Duan, Experimental realization of a multiplexed quantum memory with 225 individually accessible mem- ory cells, Nat. Commun. 8, 15359 (2017)

    2017

  10. [17]

    Wang, M.-J

    S.-Z. Wang, M.-J. Wang, Y.-F. Wen, Z.-X. Xu, T.-F. Ma, S.- J. Li, and H. Wang, Long-lived and multiplexed atom-photon entanglement interface with feed-forward controlled readouts, Commun. Phys. 4, 168 (2021)

    2021

  11. [18]

    C. Li, S. Zhang, Y.-K. Wu, N. Jiang, Y.-F. Pu, and L.-M. Duan, Multicell atomic quantum memory as a hardware-efficient quantum repeater node, PRX Quan- tum 2, 040307 (2021)

    2021

  12. [19]

    Kolchin, Electromagnetically-induced-transparency- based paired photon generation, Phys

    P. Kolchin, Electromagnetically-induced-transparency- based paired photon generation, Phys. Rev. A75, 033814 (2007)

    2007

  13. [21]

    A. N. Craddock, Y. Wang, F. Giraldo, R. Sekelsky, M. Flament, and M. Namazi, High-rate subgigahertz- linewidth bichromatic entanglement source for quantum networking, Phys. Rev. Appl. 21, 034012 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    J. Bae, J. Park, Y. J. Yu, H.-R. Noh, H. S. Moon, Polarization-entangled photon pairs from warm atomic ensemble with magnetic background noise, Adv. Quan- tum Technol. 6, 2200118 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    Davidson, O

    O. Davidson, O. Yogev, E. Poem, and O. Firstenberg, Single-photon synchronization with a room-temperature atomic quantum memory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 033601 8 (2023)

    2023

  16. [24]

    A. N. Craddock, A. Lazenby, G. B. Portmann, R. Sekel- sky, M. Flament, and M. Namazi, Automated distri- bution of polarization-entangled photons using deployed New York City fibers, PRX Quantum 5, 030330 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    C. W. S. Chang, C. Sab ´ ın, P. Forn-D ´ ıaz, F. Quijandr ´ ıa, A. M. Vadiraj, I. Nsanzineza, G. Johansson, and C. M. Wilson, Observation of three-photon spontaneous para- metric down-conversion in a superconducting parametric cavity, Phys. Rev. X 10, 011011 (2020)

    2020

  18. [26]

    Buser, R

    G. Buser, R. Mottola, B. Cotting, J. Wolters, and P. Treutlein, Single-photon storage in a ground-state vapor cell quantum memory, PRX Quantum 3, 020349 (2022)

    2022

  19. [27]

    S. E. Harris, J. E. Field, and A. Imamo˘ glu, Nonlinear op- tical processes using electromagnetically induced trans- parency, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1107 (1990)

    1990

  20. [28]

    Fleischhauer, A

    M. Fleischhauer, A. Imamoglu, and J. P. Marangos, Elec- tromagnetically induced transparency: optics in coherent media, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 633 (2005)

    2005

  21. [29]

    Hsu, C.-Y

    H. Hsu, C.-Y. Cheng, J.-S. Shiu, L.-C. Chen, and Y.-F. Chen, Quantum fidelity of electromagnetically induced transparency: the full quantum theory, Opt. Express 30, 2097 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    L. Zhao, X. Guo, C. Liu, Y. Sun, M. M. T. Loy, and S. Du, Photon pairs with coherence time exceeding 1 µs, Optica 1, 84 (2014)

    2014

  23. [31]

    Wang, K.-B

    Y.-S. Wang, K.-B. Li, C.-F. Chang, T.-W. Lin, J.-Q. Li, S.-S. Hsiao, J.-M. Chen, Y.-H. Lai, Y.-C. Chen, Y.-F. Chen, C.-S. Chuu, and I. A. Yu, Temporally ultralong biphotons with a linewidth of 50 kHz, APL Photonics 7, 126102 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    C. Shu, P. Chen, T. K. A. Chow, L. Zhu, Y. Xiao, M. M. T. Loy, and S. Du, Subnatural-linewidth biphotons from a Doppler-broadened hot atomic vapour cell, Nat. Commun. 7, 12783 (2016)

    2016

  25. [33]

    Hsiao, W.-K

    S.-S. Hsiao, W.-K. Huang, Y.-M. Lin, J.-M. Chen, C.-Y. Hsu, and I. A. Yu, Temporal profile of biphotons gener- ated from a hot atomic vapor and spectrum of electro- magnetically induced transparency, Phys. Rev. A 106, 023709 (2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    S. Zhou, S. Zhang, C. Liu, J. F. Chen, J. Wen, M. M. T. Loy, G. K. L. Wong, and S. Du, Optimal storage and retrieval of single-photon waveforms, Opt. Express 20, 24124 (2012)

    2012

  27. [35]

    Ding, Z.-Y

    D.-S. Ding, Z.-Y. Zhou, B.-S. Shi, and G.-C. Guo, Single-photon-level quantum image memory based on cold atomic ensembles, Nat. Commun. 4, 2527 (2013)

    2013

  28. [36]

    Y. Wang, J. Li, S. Zhang, K. Su, Y. Zhou, K. Liao, S. Du, H. Yan, and S.-L. Zhu, Efficient quantum memory for single-photon polarization qubits, Nat. Photonics 13, 346 (2019)

    2019

  29. [37]

    Cheng, J.-J

    C.-Y. Cheng, J.-J. Lee, Z.-Y. Liu, J.-S. Shiu, and Y.-F. Chen, Quantum frequency conversion based on resonant four-wave mixing, Phys. Rev. A 103, 023711 (2021)

    2021

  30. [38]

    Cheng, Z.-Y

    C.-Y. Cheng, Z.-Y. Liu, P.-S. Hu, T.-N. Wang, C.-Y. Chien, J.-K. Lin, J.-Y. Juo, J.-S. Shiu, I. A. Yu, Y.- C. Chen, and Y.-F. Chen, Efficient frequency conversion based on resonant four-wave mixing, Opt. Lett. 46, 681 (2021)

    2021

  31. [39]

    Tseng, L.-C

    P.-H. Tseng, L.-C. Chen, J.-S. Shiu, and Y.-F. Chen, Quantum interface for telecom frequency conversion based on diamond-type atomic ensembles, Phys. Rev. A 109, 043716 (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    Liu, Y.-H

    Z.-Y. Liu, Y.-H. Chen, Y.-C. Chen, H.-Y. Lo, P.-J. Tsai, I. A. Yu, Y.-C. Chen, and Y.-F. Chen, Large cross-phase modulations at the few-photon level, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 203601 (2016)

    2016

  33. [41]

    Chang, T.-P

    K.-F. Chang, T.-P. Wang, C.-Y. Chen, Y.-H. Chen, Y.-S. Wang, Y.-F. Chen, Y.-C. Chen, and I. A. Yu, Low-loss high-fidelity frequency beam splitter with tunable split ratio based on electromagnetically induced transparency, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 013096 (2021)

    2021

  34. [42]

    Liu, J.-S

    Z.-Y. Liu, J.-S. Shiu, C.-Y. Cheng, and Y.-F. Chen, Con- trolling frequency-domain Hong-Ou-Mandel interference via electromagnetically induced transparency, Phys. Rev. A 108, 013702 (2023)

    2023

  35. [43]

    Kolchin, S

    P. Kolchin, S. Du, C. Belthangady, G. Y. Yin, and S. E. Harris, Generation of narrow-bandwidth paired photons: use of a single driving laser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 113602 (2006)

    2006

  36. [44]

    Chen, B.-S

    Q.-F. Chen, B.-S. Shi, M. Feng, Y.-S. Zhang, and G.-C. Guo, Non-degenerate nonclassical photon pairs in a hot atomic ensemble, Opt. Express 16, 21708 (2008)

    2008

  37. [45]

    L. S. Marinho, M. O. Ara´ ujo, W. Martins, and D. Felinto, Enhancing nonclassical correlations for light scattered by an ensemble of cold two-level atoms, Opt. Lett. 48, 3323 (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    L. Zhu, X. Guo, C. Shu, H. Jeong, and S. Du, Bright narrowband biphoton generation from a hot rubidium atomic vapor cell, Appl. Phys. Lett. 110, 161101 (2017)

    2017

  39. [47]

    Chen, C.-Y

    J.-M. Chen, C.-Y. Hsu, W.-K. Huang, S.-S. Hsiao, F.- C. Huang, Y.-H. Chen, C.-S. Chuu, Y.-C. Chen, Y.-F. Chen, and I. A. Yu, Room-temperature biphoton source with a spectral brightness near the ultimate limit, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 023132 (2022)

    2022

  40. [48]

    H. Yan, S. Zhang, J. F. Chen, M. M. T. Loy, G. K. L. Wong, and S. Du, Generation of narrow-band hyper- entangled nondegenerate paired photon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 033601 (2011)

    2011

  41. [49]

    C. Liu, J. F. Chen, S. Zhang, S. Zhou, Y.-H. Kim, M. M. T. Loy, G. K. L. Wong, and S. Du, Two-photon interfer- ences with degenerate and nondegenerate paired photons, Phys. Rev. A 85, 021803(R) (2012)

    2012

  42. [50]

    P. Chen, C. Shu, X. Guo, M. M. T. Loy, and S. Du, Measuring the biphoton temporal wave function with polarization-dependent and time-resolved two-photon in- terference, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 010401 (2015)

    2015

  43. [51]

    Wen and M

    J. Wen and M. H. Rubin, Transverse effects in paired- photon generation via an electromagnetically induced transparency medium. I. Perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. A 74, 023808 (2006)

    2006

  44. [52]

    S. Du, J. Wen, and M. H. Rubin, Narrowband biphoton generation near atomic resonance, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 25, C98 (2008)

    2008

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.