Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

AnyDressing: Customizable Multi-Garment Virtual Dressing via Latent Diffusion Models

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read AnyDressing is a two-network latent-diffusion method that generates a person wearing any combination of reference garments while following a text prompt, and reports the highest texture-consistency and text-alignment scores against…

desk verdict A genuinely new multi-garment virtual dressing task with a plausible architecture, but the evaluation has a load-bearing train/test domain gap the authors acknowledge and then hand-wave away. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.04146 v2 pith:RWX3BNFA submitted 2024-12-05 cs.CV

Xinghui Li , Qichao Sun , Pengze Zhang , Fulong Ye , Zhichao Liao , Wanquan Feng , Songtao Zhao , Qian He This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords multi-garmentvirtualdressinglatentdiffusionmodelsgarment-centricimagegenerationreference-imageconditionedattentionlocalizationtexturepreservationplug-incompatibilitycustomization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

AnyDressing tackles a task the paper calls Multi-Garment Virtual Dressing: given several reference garments and a text prompt, generate a new image of a person wearing all of them in a scene described by the prompt. The method separates garment encoding from garment placement, using a shared garment encoder with per-garment self-attention paths to extract textures without blending them, and a dressing network that injects each garment's features only into its corresponding body region. The paper reports that this design beats earlier single-garment dressing methods on texture consistency, prompt alignment, and human preference, and that it works as a plug-in alongside pose, identity, and style controls. If it holds, the result is a practical tool for e-commerce and design that lets a user mix and match outfits that never existed as a training pair.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the combination of parallel per-garment self-attention and region-localized cross-attention. In GarmentsNet, all garments share one U-Net's weights, but each has its own self-attention query/key/value projections implemented as LoRA matrices, which keeps the added parameters small and prevents different garments from merging into a single blended feature. In DressingNet, a Dressing-Attention module adds the garment features through trainable key/value projections while the original self-attention stays frozen, and an Instance-Level Garment Localization loss drives each garment's attention map toward the corresponding human-part segmentation mask. The two together are what let the model, in the paper's telling, scale to any number of garments and still answer to the text prompt.

What would settle it

Run the model on held-out in-shop/in-shop garment pairs (a format absent from training) and measure per-garment texture consistency with the paper's CLIP-I* protocol; if the score on those pairs falls well below the reported 0.734 for mixed-format pairs, the 'any combination' claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that multi-garment virtual dressing can be made reliable by giving each garment its own dedicated feature path instead of feeding several garments through one shared encoder. AnyDressing consists of GarmentsNet, which encodes N garment images in parallel through shared U-Net layers plus per-garment self-attention with LoRA matrices, and DressingNet, a frozen diffusion U-Net augmented with a Dressing-Attention module that cross-attends to the concatenated garment features. To keep each garment from bleeding into unrelated regions, an Instance-Level Garment Localization loss regularizes each garment's attention map to match its segmentation mask. A Garment-Enhanced Texture Learning objective adds perceptual and high-frequency edge losses on the garment regions. With these parts, the paper reports that AnyDressing preserves fine textures, follows the text prompt, and surpasses the compared single-garment baselines on both single- and multi-garment benchmarks.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that training on triplets built from one in-shop garment plus one garment cropped from a model image teaches the model to combine garment formats it never saw together, such as two in-shop garments or two cropped garments, and the proprietary half of that training data is not public, so the assumption cannot be checked independently.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any number of garments can be added by attaching one more set of LoRA weights, so the same architecture extends from upper/lower pairs to hats and other accessories.
  • Because the garment encoder and dressing attention are modular, AnyDressing can be combined with community control extensions such as pose, edge, identity, and stylized LoRAs without retraining them.
  • The CLIP-I* evaluation protocol, which partitions the synthesized person by pose and measures garment consistency per region, gives later multi-garment dressing work a direct quantitative benchmark.
  • The three training losses (diffusion noise, attention localization, and texture) are complementary; ablations attribute gains in texture consistency mostly to GFE/GTL and gains in prompt alignment mostly to IGL.
  • The user study, where 77 to 93.8 percent of participants preferred AnyDressing on the four criteria, if representative, suggests the difference is visible to non-expert users.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, I would expect the generalization to break more on in-shop/in-shop pairs than the paper tests, since the training data never contains that pair format; a direct test on such pairs would be the quickest way to see how far the 'any combination' promise extends.
  • I would also expect the per-garment LoRA paths to become the parameter bottleneck: the claimed scalability to 'any number' still adds one set of LoRA matrices per garment, so the practical limit is set by memory and training data diversity, not by the architecture's conceptual design.
  • A natural extension is to apply the same parallel self-attention idea to several images of the same person's face or identity, where per-instance attention could reduce identity blending in multi-ID generation.
  • For e-commerce use, a decisive test is cross-dataset generalization: train on DressCode and proprietary data, then evaluate on an unrelated held-out shop's catalog with unseen lighting and background; the paper's benchmark does not include that distribution shift.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes AnyDressing, a latent diffusion framework for multi-garment virtual dressing: given a text prompt and several reference garment images, it generates a person wearing those garments. The method has two main components: GarmentsNet, which uses a Garment-Specific Feature Extractor with per-garment parallel self-attention and LoRA adapters to encode multiple garments without blending; and DressingNet, which injects those features through a Dressing-Attention mechanism, an Instance-Level Garment Localization loss that supervises attention maps with garment masks, and a Garment-Enhanced Texture Learning loss combining perceptual and high-frequency losses. Training uses image triplets constructed from DressCode and an unreported proprietary dataset, where each triplet contains one in-shop garment and one garment cropped from the model image. Experiments compare against IP-Adapter, StableGarment, MagicClothing, and IMAGDressing on single- and multi-garment benchmarks, using CLIP metrics and a 40-user study, and report state-of-the-art claims along with plugin compatibility with ControlNet, LoRA, and FaceID.

Significance. If the central claims are correct, the paper makes a practical contribution: it extends garment-centric generation from a single garment to several garments, introduces a parameter-efficient encoding design, and demonstrates compatibility with widely used community plugins. The GFE design is a sensible way to avoid garment confusion without duplicating a full U-Net; the IGL loss is a straightforward and appropriate use of ground-truth masks; and the GTL losses address a real weakness of pure latent MSE training. The quantitative and user-study results, if they hold, would support a strong advantage over the considered baselines. However, the evidence is currently weakened by the untested training/inference distribution mismatch, the absence of error bars and significance testing, a newly introduced evaluation metric whose validity is not established, and reliance on a large proprietary training set. These issues bear directly on the strength of the advertised claims, so the significance is conditional on resolving them.

major comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 7.2] The training triplets are always built from one in-shop garment and one human-parsing-cropped garment, and the paper explicitly states that the model never saw (in-shop, in-shop) or (cropped, cropped) pairs during training. Since users will typically provide two laid-out garment images, the central promise of 'any combination' depends on an untested generalization. The sentence claiming 'strong robustness' is not supported by any controlled quantitative comparison across pair-type combinations. The authors should provide such an evaluation, for example by taking the same upper/lower garment pair in both formats and testing all four combinations; without it, the model may be exploiting the systematic difference between the cropped and in-shop inputs rather than learning a general compositional dressing function.
  2. [Sec. 5.1 / Table 1] The multi-garment baselines are obtained by spatially concatenating multiple garments and feeding them to methods that were designed and trained for single-garment input. This is a weak comparison: it does not show that AnyDressing is state-of-the-art relative to methods that can natively handle multiple conditioning images or multi-subject customization. In addition, the numbers in Table 1 are reported without standard deviations, confidence intervals, or significance tests, so the claim that the method 'significantly surpasses all baselines across all metrics' is not statistically supported. Please add repeated-run statistics and, if possible, stronger multi-garment or multi-condition baselines.
  3. [Sec. 5.1] The newly introduced CLIP-I* metric is used to support the central multi-garment texture-consistency claim, but the paper does not define how the OpenPose partitions are matched to each reference garment, how failures such as missing or overlapping parts are handled, or whether the metric has been validated against human judgment. Since this metric was created by the authors for this paper, it should be validated or supplemented with standard per-garment CLIP-I computed from ground-truth segmentation, and ideally compared with user-study preferences. Without this, the main quantitative evidence for multi-garment fidelity is difficult to interpret.
  4. [Sec. 7.2] More than half of the training triplets (37,065 of 63,179) come from a proprietary dataset that is not released, and no model checkpoint or code is provided. This prevents independent verification of the central generalization claim and of the reported quantitative results. At minimum, the authors should release the model, or train and report results using only the public DressCode subset, to show that the method does not rely critically on the proprietary data.
  5. [Sec. 5.3 / Table 2] The user study is based on 40 respondents and on images drawn from the authors' own test set and prompts. The reported preference percentages, e.g. 93.80% for texture consistency, are striking but are not accompanied by confidence intervals, inter-annotator agreement, or any statistical test. The paper should report these quantities and describe how the 50 displayed sets were selected, to rule out selection effects and to make the result reproducible.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 1] The table header contains the typo 'Grament' instead of 'Garment' in the column labels.
  2. [Eq. (12)] The perceptual loss is named 'Lprec' in the equation but 'Lperc' in the surrounding text; please unify the notation.
  3. [Sec. 4.1 / Sec. 8] The paper claims scalability to 'any number of garments,' but the experiments only demonstrate up to three garment categories (upper, lower, and hat). The architectural argument for scalability is reasonable, but the claim should be scoped to the tested range unless further experiments are added.
  4. [Sec. 4.4 / Eq. (16)] The classifier-free guidance formula uses εθ(zt,t) for the unconditional term, but does not specify what conditioning dropout is used for text and garment conditions during training; please clarify the training-time dropout procedure that makes this inference-time formula valid.
  5. [Sec. 5.2] The qualitative comparison in Figure 3 would be easier to assess if the reference garment thumbnails were displayed next to each generated image, and if failure cases (e.g., garment blend, text-prompt mismatch) were shown for each method, rather than only the most successful examples.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: AnyDressing is an empirical pipeline with standard supervised losses and no load-bearing self-citation chain.

full rationale

AnyDressing is an empirical image-generation system, not a mathematical derivation, so most circularity patterns do not apply. The central components (GFE, DA, IGL, GTL) are architectures and training losses whose effectiveness is demonstrated by ablations against a ReferenceNet baseline; none of the losses predicts the quantity it supervises. The IGL loss uses ground-truth segmentation masks to supervise attention maps, and GTL uses the ground-truth image and Canny edges for perceptual and high-frequency losses; these are standard supervision signals, not fitted parameters renamed as predictions. The inference-time hyperparameters (lambda, eta, lambda1, lambda2) are manually set and ancillary. The paper contains no load-bearing self-citations: references to prior work are external baselines (IP-Adapter, StableGarment, MagicClothing, IMAGDressing) and standard components (LoRA, ControlNet, OpenPose), with no author-overlap citation chain used to justify the method. The newly introduced CLIP-I* metric is an evaluation choice, not an input to training, so it cannot make the derivation circular. Sec. 7.2 explicitly acknowledges a domain gap: training triplets always mix one in-shop and one cropped garment, so the model never sees in-shop/in-shop or cropped/cropped pairs. This is an untested generalization assumption and a correctness or evaluation risk, not a circular step, because the paper neither fits a parameter to the evaluation set nor defines its central claim in terms of that assumption. Overall, no step in the derivation chain reduces by construction to its own inputs; score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim (state-of-the-art multi-garment virtual dressing) rests on a trained neural network, so the ledger records the hand-chosen hyperparameters, the pretrained-diffusion backbone, and the data-construction assumptions.

free parameters (5)
  • lambda (Dressing-Attention weight) = 0.7
    Controls the strength of garment features vs. frozen self-attention in Eq. 6; set manually, not learned.
  • eta (GTL timestep threshold) = 350
    GTL losses apply only when noise level is low; chosen by hand to avoid noisy reconstructions.
  • lambda1 (IGL loss weight) = 0.01
    Weight for the localization regularization in Eq. 15; manually set.
  • lambda2 (GTL loss weight) = 0.001
    Weight for the texture loss in Eq. 15; manually set.
  • guidance scale omega = 6.0
    Classifier-free guidance scale at inference (Eq. 16); manually set.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Pretrained Stable Diffusion v1.5 U-Net provides the base feature space for both GarmentsNet and DressingNet.
    Sec. 4.4 initializes both networks with SD v1.5 weights; the method inherits all biases and capabilities of that backbone.
  • domain assumption Human parsing (SSSegmentation tools) correctly extracts garment masks from model images to build training triplets and IGL targets.
    Sec. 5.1 / Supp. 7.2 rely on parsing to create cropped garments and masks; errors in parsing propagate to training and to the IGL supervisory signal.
  • domain assumption The concatenation of an in-shop garment and a cropped garment in a triplet is a valid training signal for learning to dress in arbitrary combinations.
    Sec. 7.2 acknowledges no in-shop/in-shop or cropped/cropped pairs were in training, yet claims generalization; the assumption is that the learned mapping transfers.
  • standard math Standard diffusion training objective (Eq. 14) with the added losses is sufficient for the model to learn garment-texture preservation and text alignment.
    This is the standard LDM training; the paper does not prove convergence but relies on the established diffusion literature.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of AnyDressing: Customizable Multi-Garment Virtual Dressing via Latent Diffusion Models." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RWX3BNFA

@misc{pith2026241204146,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: AnyDressing: Customizable Multi-Garment Virtual Dressing via Latent Diffusion Models},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RWX3BNFA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.04146}
}
read the original abstract

Recent advances in garment-centric image generation from text and image prompts based on diffusion models are impressive. However, existing methods lack support for various combinations of attire, and struggle to preserve the garment details while maintaining faithfulness to the text prompts, limiting their performance across diverse scenarios. In this paper, we focus on a new task, i.e., Multi-Garment Virtual Dressing, and we propose a novel AnyDressing method for customizing characters conditioned on any combination of garments and any personalized text prompts. AnyDressing comprises two primary networks named GarmentsNet and DressingNet, which are respectively dedicated to extracting detailed clothing features and generating customized images. Specifically, we propose an efficient and scalable module called Garment-Specific Feature Extractor in GarmentsNet to individually encode garment textures in parallel. This design prevents garment confusion while ensuring network efficiency. Meanwhile, we design an adaptive Dressing-Attention mechanism and a novel Instance-Level Garment Localization Learning strategy in DressingNet to accurately inject multi-garment features into their corresponding regions. This approach efficiently integrates multi-garment texture cues into generated images and further enhances text-image consistency. Additionally, we introduce a Garment-Enhanced Texture Learning strategy to improve the fine-grained texture details of garments. Thanks to our well-craft design, AnyDressing can serve as a plug-in module to easily integrate with any community control extensions for diffusion models, improving the diversity and controllability of synthesized images. Extensive experiments show that AnyDressing achieves state-of-the-art results.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.04146 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Customizable virtual dressing results of our AnyDressing. Reliability: AnyDressing is well-suited for a variety of scenes and complex garments. Compatibility: AnyDressing is compatible with LoRA [15] and plugins such as ControlNet [55] and FaceID [54]. Abstract Recent advances in garment-centric image generation from text and image prompts based on diffusion models are impressive. However, existing methods lack supp… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overview of AnyDressing. Given N target garments, AnyDressing customizes a character dressed in multiple target garments. The GarmentsNet leverages the Garment-Specific Feature Extractor (GFE) module to extract detailed features from multiple garments. The DressingNet integrates these features for virtual dressing using a Dressing-Attention (DA) module and an Instance-Level Garment Localization Learning mechanism. M… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Qualitative comparisons with state-of-the-art methods. Please zoom in for more details. to better evaluate multi-garment dressing, we introduce a new metric CLIP-I∗ to assess texture consistency by lever￾aging OpenPose [1] to obtain the matching partitions of the reference garments in the synthesized image and averaging their CLIP-I metrics. 5.2. Qualitative Analysis Since the compared methods lack multi-garment sup… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (14 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Ablation results on GFE and IGL modules. w/o GTL w GTL [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Ablation results on GTL module. GFE IGL GTL CLIP-T ↑ CLIP-I∗ ↑ CLIP-AS ↑ % % % 0.260 0.625 5.572 " % % 0.265 0.718 5.627 " " % 0.289 0.722 5.790 " " " 0.296 0.734 5.874 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Examples of the training dataset I [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Screenshot of user study. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Examples of the training dataset II. ”A girl, sky, in a field of flowers” ”A girl sitting on the grass” ”A girl, in the gym” ”A girl, red hair, wearing a hat, by a fence” [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Qualitative results of more combinations of clothing items. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: More ablation results on GFE and IGL modules. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: More qualitative comparisons I. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: More qualitative comparisons II. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: More qualitative results I. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: More qualitative results II. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: More qualitative results III. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: More results of combining ControlNet [55] and FaceID [54]. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: More results of combining LoRAs [15]. 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_18.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Grid: Omni Visual Generation

    cs.CV 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    GRID shows that fine-tuning an image diffusion model on videos arranged as grid images can generate coherent video and multi-view sequences with far less data and compute than specialized video models.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Open- pose: Realtime multi-person 2d pose estimation using part affinity fields

    Z Cao, G Hidalgo, T Simon, SE Wei, and Y Sheikh. Open- pose: Realtime multi-person 2d pose estimation using part affinity fields. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 43(1):172–186, 2020. 7

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    Magicdance: Realistic human dance video gen- eration with motions & facial expressions transfer

    Di Chang, Yichun Shi, Quankai Gao, Jessica Fu, Hongyi Xu, Guoxian Song, Qing Yan, Xiao Yang, and Mohammad So- leymani. Magicdance: Realistic human dance video gen- eration with motions & facial expressions transfer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.12052, 2023. 4

    arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    Muse: Text-to-image generation via masked generative transform- ers

    Huiwen Chang, Han Zhang, Jarred Barber, AJ Maschinot, Jose Lezama, Lu Jiang, Ming-Hsuan Yang, Kevin Mur- phy, William T Freeman, Michael Rubinstein, et al. Muse: Text-to-image generation via masked generative transform- ers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.00704, 2023. 2

    arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    Magic clothing: Controllable garment-driven image synthe- sis

    Weifeng Chen, Tao Gu, Yuhao Xu, and Chengcai Chen. Magic clothing: Controllable garment-driven image synthe- sis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.09512, 2024. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

    arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Viton-hd: High-resolution virtual try-on via misalignment-aware normalization

    Seunghwan Choi, Sunghyun Park, Minsoo Lee, and Jaegul Choo. Viton-hd: High-resolution virtual try-on via misalignment-aware normalization. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 14131–14140, 2021. 3, 6, 8, 1

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Improving diffusion models for vir- tual try-on

    Yisol Choi, Sangkyung Kwak, Kyungmin Lee, Hyungwon Choi, and Jinwoo Shin. Improving diffusion models for vir- tual try-on. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.05139, 2024. 3

    arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Image quality assessment: Unifying structure and texture similarity

    Keyan Ding, Kede Ma, Shiqi Wang, and Eero P Simoncelli. Image quality assessment: Unifying structure and texture similarity. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and ma- chine intelligence, 44(5):2567–2581, 2020. 5

    2020

  8. [8]

    On the canny edge de- tector

    Lijun Ding and Ardeshir Goshtasby. On the canny edge de- tector. Pattern recognition, 34(3):721–725, 2001. 6

    work page 2001

Show all 65 references
  1. [9]

    Cogview: Mastering text-to-image generation via transformers

    Ming Ding, Zhuoyi Yang, Wenyi Hong, Wendi Zheng, Chang Zhou, Da Yin, Junyang Lin, Xu Zou, Zhou Shao, Hongxia Yang, et al. Cogview: Mastering text-to-image generation via transformers. Advances in neural information processing systems, 34:19822–19835, 2021. 2

    2021

  2. [10]

    An image is worth one word: Personalizing text-to- image generation using textual inversion

    Rinon Gal, Yuval Alaluf, Yuval Atzmon, Or Patash- nik, Amit H Bermano, Gal Chechik, and Daniel Cohen- Or. An image is worth one word: Personalizing text-to- image generation using textual inversion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.01618, 2022. 2, 3

    2022 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Taming the power of diffusion models for high-quality virtual try-on with appearance flow

    Junhong Gou, Siyu Sun, Jianfu Zhang, Jianlou Si, Chen Qian, and Liqing Zhang. Taming the power of diffusion models for high-quality virtual try-on with appearance flow. In Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pages 7599–7607, 2023. 3

    2023

  4. [12]

    Mix-of-show: Decentralized low- rank adaptation for multi-concept customization of diffusion models

    Yuchao Gu, Xintao Wang, Jay Zhangjie Wu, Yujun Shi, Yun- peng Chen, Zihan Fan, Wuyou Xiao, Rui Zhao, Shuning Chang, Weijia Wu, et al. Mix-of-show: Decentralized low- rank adaptation for multi-concept customization of diffusion models. Advances in Neural Information Processing ...

    2024

  5. [13]

    Style-based global appearance flow for virtual try-on

    Sen He, Yi-Zhe Song, and Tao Xiang. Style-based global appearance flow for virtual try-on. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 3470–3479, 2022. 3

    2022

  6. [14]

    Denoising dif- fusion probabilistic models

    Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel. Denoising dif- fusion probabilistic models. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:6840–6851, 2020. 2

    2020

  7. [15]

    Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models

    Edward J Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen- Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, and Weizhu Chen. Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.09685, 2021. 1, 2, 3, 4, 12

    2021 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Animate anyone: Consistent and controllable image- to-video synthesis for character animation

    Li Hu. Animate anyone: Consistent and controllable image- to-video synthesis for character animation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 8153–8163, 2024. 4, 8, 2

    2024

  9. [17]

    Resolving multi-condition confusion for finetuning-free personalized image generation

    Qihan Huang, Siming Fu, Jinlong Liu, Hao Jiang, Yipeng Yu, and Jie Song. Resolving multi-condition confusion for finetuning-free personalized image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.17920, 2024. 3

    2024 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Reversion: Diffusion-based relation inversion from images

    Ziqi Huang, Tianxing Wu, Yuming Jiang, Kelvin CK Chan, and Ziwei Liu. Reversion: Diffusion-based relation inversion from images. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.13495, 2023. 2

    2023 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Do not mask what you do not need to mask: a parser-free virtual try-on

    Thibaut Issenhuth, J ´er´emie Mary, and Cl ´ement Calauzenes. Do not mask what you do not need to mask: a parser-free virtual try-on. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th Euro- pean Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Pro- ceedings, Part XX 16, pages 619–635. Springer, 2020. 3

    2020

  12. [20]

    Sssegmenation: An open source supervised semantic segmentation toolbox based on pytorch

    Zhenchao Jin. Sssegmenation: An open source supervised semantic segmentation toolbox based on pytorch. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.17091, 2023. 1

    2023 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Idrnet: Intervention-driven relation network for semantic segmentation

    Zhenchao Jin, Xiaowei Hu, Lingting Zhu, Luchuan Song, Li Yuan, and Lequan Yu. Idrnet: Intervention-driven relation network for semantic segmentation. Advances in Neural In- formation Processing Systems, 36, 2024. 1 9

    2024

  14. [22]

    Scal- ing up gans for text-to-image synthesis

    Minguk Kang, Jun-Yan Zhu, Richard Zhang, Jaesik Park, Eli Shechtman, Sylvain Paris, and Taesung Park. Scal- ing up gans for text-to-image synthesis. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 10124–10134, 2023. 2

    2023

  15. [23]

    Instantfamily: Masked attention for zero-shot multi-id image generation

    Chanran Kim, Jeongin Lee, Shichang Joung, Bongmo Kim, and Yeul-Min Baek. Instantfamily: Masked attention for zero-shot multi-id image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.19427, 2024. 3

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Stableviton: Learning semantic correspon- dence with latent diffusion model for virtual try-on

    Jeongho Kim, Guojung Gu, Minho Park, Sunghyun Park, and Jaegul Choo. Stableviton: Learning semantic correspon- dence with latent diffusion model for virtual try-on. In Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 8176–8185, 2024. 3

    2024

  17. [25]

    Multi-concept customization of text-to-image diffusion

    Nupur Kumari, Bingliang Zhang, Richard Zhang, Eli Shechtman, and Jun-Yan Zhu. Multi-concept customization of text-to-image diffusion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 1931–1941, 2023. 2, 3

    1931

  18. [26]

    High-resolution virtual try-on with misalignment and occlusion-handled conditions

    Sangyun Lee, Gyojung Gu, Sunghyun Park, Seunghwan Choi, and Jaegul Choo. High-resolution virtual try-on with misalignment and occlusion-handled conditions. In Eu- ropean Conference on Computer Vision , pages 204–219. Springer, 2022. 3

    2022

  19. [27]

    Blip-diffusion: Pre- trained subject representation for controllable text-to-image generation and editing

    Dongxu Li, Junnan Li, and Steven Hoi. Blip-diffusion: Pre- trained subject representation for controllable text-to-image generation and editing. Advances in Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems, 36, 2024. 3

    2024

  20. [28]

    Toward accurate and realistic outfits visualization with atten- tion to details

    Kedan Li, Min Jin Chong, Jeffrey Zhang, and Jingen Liu. Toward accurate and realistic outfits visualization with atten- tion to details. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 15546– 15555, 2021. 3

    2021

  21. [29]

    Photomaker: Customizing re- alistic human photos via stacked id embedding

    Zhen Li, Mingdeng Cao, Xintao Wang, Zhongang Qi, Ming- Ming Cheng, and Ying Shan. Photomaker: Customizing re- alistic human photos via stacked id embedding. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 8640–8650, 2024. 3

    2024

  22. [30]

    Dreamfit: Garment-centric human generation via a lightweight anything-dressing en- coder

    Ente Lin, Xujie Zhang, Fuwei Zhao, Yuxuan Luo, Xin Dong, Long Zeng, and Xiaodan Liang. Dreamfit: Garment-centric human generation via a lightweight anything-dressing en- coder. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.17644, 2024. 2, 3, 4

    2024 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Cones 2: Customizable image synthesis with multi- ple subjects

    Zhiheng Liu, Yifei Zhang, Yujun Shen, Kecheng Zheng, Kai Zhu, Ruili Feng, Yu Liu, Deli Zhao, Jingren Zhou, and Yang Cao. Cones 2: Customizable image synthesis with multi- ple subjects. In Proceedings of the 37th International Con- ference on Neural Information Processing Syste...

    2023

  24. [32]

    Decoupled weight decay regularization

    I Loshchilov. Decoupled weight decay regularization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101, 2017. 6

    2017 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Subject- diffusion: Open domain personalized text-to-image genera- tion without test-time fine-tuning

    Jian Ma, Junhao Liang, Chen Chen, and Haonan Lu. Subject- diffusion: Open domain personalized text-to-image genera- tion without test-time fine-tuning. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2024 Conference Papers, pages 1–12, 2024. 2, 3

    2024

  26. [34]

    Dress code: High- resolution multi-category virtual try-on

    Davide Morelli, Matteo Fincato, Marcella Cornia, Federico Landi, Fabio Cesari, and Rita Cucchiara. Dress code: High- resolution multi-category virtual try-on. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 2231–2235, 2022. 3, 6, 1

    2022

  27. [35]

    Ladi-vton: Latent diffusion textual-inversion enhanced virtual try-on

    Davide Morelli, Alberto Baldrati, Giuseppe Cartella, Mar- cella Cornia, Marco Bertini, and Rita Cucchiara. Ladi-vton: Latent diffusion textual-inversion enhanced virtual try-on. In Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pages 8580–8589, 2023. 3

    2023

  28. [36]

    T2i-adapter: Learning adapters to dig out more controllable ability for text-to-image diffusion models

    Chong Mou, Xintao Wang, Liangbin Xie, Yanze Wu, Jian Zhang, Zhongang Qi, and Ying Shan. T2i-adapter: Learning adapters to dig out more controllable ability for text-to-image diffusion models. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 4296–4304, 2024. 3

    2024

  29. [37]

    Hierarchical text-conditional image gener- ation with clip latents

    Aditya Ramesh, Prafulla Dhariwal, Alex Nichol, Casey Chu, and Mark Chen. Hierarchical text-conditional image gener- ation with clip latents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.06125, 1 (2):3, 2022. 2

    2022 arXiv

  30. [38]

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models

    Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Bj ¨orn Ommer. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 10684–10695, 2022. 2, 3, 6

    2022

  31. [39]

    Dreambooth: Fine tuning text-to-image diffusion models for subject-driven generation

    Nataniel Ruiz, Yuanzhen Li, Varun Jampani, Yael Pritch, Michael Rubinstein, and Kfir Aberman. Dreambooth: Fine tuning text-to-image diffusion models for subject-driven generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 2250...

    2023

  32. [40]

    Imagdressing-v1: Customiz- able virtual dressing

    Fei Shen, Xin Jiang, Xin He, Hu Ye, Cong Wang, Xiaoyu Du, Zechao Li, and Jinghui Tang. Imagdressing-v1: Customiz- able virtual dressing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.12705 ,

    arXiv

  33. [41]

    In- stantbooth: Personalized text-to-image generation without test-time finetuning

    Jing Shi, Wei Xiong, Zhe Lin, and Hyun Joon Jung. In- stantbooth: Personalized text-to-image generation without test-time finetuning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 8543–8552, 2024. 2

    2024

  34. [42]

    Deep unsupervised learning using nonequilibrium thermodynamics

    Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Eric Weiss, Niru Maheswaranathan, and Surya Ganguli. Deep unsupervised learning using nonequilibrium thermodynamics. In International confer- ence on machine learning, pages 2256–2265. PMLR, 2015. 2

    2015

  35. [43]

    Denoising diffusion implicit models

    Jiaming Song, Chenlin Meng, and Stefano Ermon. Denoising diffusion implicit models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02502, 2020. 6

    2010 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equa- tions

    Yang Song, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Diederik P Kingma, Ab- hishek Kumar, Stefano Ermon, and Ben Poole. Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equa- tions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.13456, 2020. 2

    2011 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Concept decomposition for visual exploration and inspiration

    Yael Vinker, Andrey V oynov, Daniel Cohen-Or, and Ariel Shamir. Concept decomposition for visual exploration and inspiration. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) , 42(6): 1–13, 2023. 2

    2023

  38. [46]

    Toward characteristic- preserving image-based virtual try-on network

    Bochao Wang, Huabin Zheng, Xiaodan Liang, Yimin Chen, Liang Lin, and Meng Yang. Toward characteristic- preserving image-based virtual try-on network. In Proceed- ings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), pages 589–604, 2018. 3 10

    2018

  39. [47]

    Stablegar- ment: Garment-centric generation via stable diffusion

    Rui Wang, Hailong Guo, Jiaming Liu, Huaxia Li, Haibo Zhao, Xu Tang, Yao Hu, Hao Tang, and Peipei Li. Stablegar- ment: Garment-centric generation via stable diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.10783, 2024. 2, 3, 4, 6

    2024 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Cogvlm: Visual expert for pretrained language models

    Weihan Wang, Qingsong Lv, Wenmeng Yu, Wenyi Hong, Ji Qi, Yan Wang, Junhui Ji, Zhuoyi Yang, Lei Zhao, Xixuan Song, et al. Cogvlm: Visual expert for pretrained language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.03079, 2023. 1

    2023 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Elite: Encoding visual con- cepts into textual embeddings for customized text-to-image generation

    Yuxiang Wei, Yabo Zhang, Zhilong Ji, Jinfeng Bai, Lei Zhang, and Wangmeng Zuo. Elite: Encoding visual con- cepts into textual embeddings for customized text-to-image generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 15943–15953, 2023. 2

    2023

  42. [50]

    Mm-diff: High-fidelity image personalization via multi-modal condition integration

    Zhichao Wei, Qingkun Su, Long Qin, and Weizhi Wang. Mm-diff: High-fidelity image personalization via multi-modal condition integration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.15059, 2024. 3

    2024 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Fastcomposer: Tuning-free multi- subject image generation with localized attention

    Guangxuan Xiao, Tianwei Yin, William T Freeman, Fr ´edo Durand, and Song Han. Fastcomposer: Tuning-free multi- subject image generation with localized attention. Interna- tional Journal of Computer Vision, pages 1–20, 2024. 3

    2024

  44. [52]

    Gp- vton: Towards general purpose virtual try-on via collabora- tive local-flow global-parsing learning

    Zhenyu Xie, Zaiyu Huang, Xin Dong, Fuwei Zhao, Haoye Dong, Xijin Zhang, Feida Zhu, and Xiaodan Liang. Gp- vton: Towards general purpose virtual try-on via collabora- tive local-flow global-parsing learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Patte...

    2023

  45. [53]

    Ootdiffusion: Outfitting fusion based latent diffusion for controllable virtual try-on

    Y Xu, T Gu, W Chen, and C Chen. Ootdiffusion: Outfitting fusion based latent diffusion for controllable virtual try-on. arxiv 2024. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.01779, 2024. 3

    2024 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Ip- adapter: Text compatible image prompt adapter for text-to- image diffusion models

    Hu Ye, Jun Zhang, Sibo Liu, Xiao Han, and Wei Yang. Ip- adapter: Text compatible image prompt adapter for text-to- image diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.06721,

    arXiv

  47. [55]

    Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models

    Lvmin Zhang, Anyi Rao, and Maneesh Agrawala. Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 3836–3847, 2023. 1, 2, 3, 11

    2023

  48. [56]

    Ssr-encoder: Encoding selective subject representation for subject-driven generation

    Yuxuan Zhang, Yiren Song, Jiaming Liu, Rui Wang, Jinpeng Yu, Hao Tang, Huaxia Li, Xu Tang, Yao Hu, Han Pan, et al. Ssr-encoder: Encoding selective subject representation for subject-driven generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Rec...

    2024

  49. [57]

    Sine: Single image editing with text- to-image diffusion models

    Zhixing Zhang, Ligong Han, Arnab Ghosh, Dimitris N Metaxas, and Jian Ren. Sine: Single image editing with text- to-image diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 6027–6037, 2023. 2 11 AnyDressing: Customizab...

    2023

  50. [58]

    Detailed Parameters In our experiments, we use SOTA large multi-modal model CogVLM [48] to caption the image

    Implementation Details 7.1. Detailed Parameters In our experiments, we use SOTA large multi-modal model CogVLM [48] to caption the image. GarmentsNet requires only one step forward process before the multiple denois- ing steps in DressingNet, causing a minimal amount of ex- tr...

  51. [59]

    Which result appears to have the highest consistency with reference garments?

  52. [60]

    Which result best matches the prompt ‘[prompt]’?

  53. [61]

    Which result appears to have the highest image quality?

  54. [62]

    Responses where all answers had the same selection and re- sponses with completely identical answers were considered invalid

    Which result matches your best choice based on compre- hensive considerations? For each set of results displayed in the survey, we en- sured that their order was randomly shuffled to prevent bias. Responses where all answers had the same selection and re- sponses with complete...

  55. [63]

    Scalability of AnyDressing To further validate the scalability of our designed Gar- mentsNet structure, we introduce more combinations of clothing items (hat, upper garment and lower garment), as illustrated in Fig. 10. As shown in Fig. 9, to train the model, we construct data...

  56. [64]

    More Ablation Study In Fig. 11, we present additional visual results to validate the effectiveness of the Garment-Specific Feature Extractor (GFE) module and the Instance-Level Garment Localiza- tion (IGL) learning mechanism. We employ traditional Ref- erenceNet [16] to encode...

  57. [65]

    More Comparisons As shown in Fig

    More Results 10.1. More Comparisons As shown in Fig. 12-13, We provide more visual com- parisons between our method and state-of-the-art base- lines [4, 40, 47, 54]. It is clear from these comparisons that our method maintains superior consistency in clothing style and texture...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.