Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 82 references

HANDI: Hand-Centric Text-and-Image Conditioned Video Generation

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that automatically predicting the motion region and supervising hand pose lets a two-stage diffusion model generate high-fidelity hand-action videos from one image and a text prompt, beating existing image-and-text and…

desk verdict HANDI is a plausible two-stage system for hand-centric video generation, but its hand-fidelity metric is the training loss, so the central claim needs independent evaluation before I'd trust the numbers. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.04189 v5 pith:3TR5QYLN submitted 2024-12-05 cs.CV

Yayuan Li , Zhi Cao , Jason J. Corso This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords videogenerationhand-centrictext-and-imageconditioneddiffusionmodelmotionareapredictionhandposerefinementegocentricinstructional
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

HANDI targets a narrow practical gap: generating a short video of a hand performing a described action inside a user's own, unedited workspace, starting from one photo and a text command. The paper argues that current text-and-image-to-video and text-to-video generators fail at this task because they animate the whole frame and treat hands as ordinary pixels, leading to hallucinated background motion and poorly rendered small hands. Its central claim is that two additions fix this: an automatically predicted motion-area mask that confines generation to the hand-object region, and a Hand Refinement Loss that explicitly compares the generated hand skeleton with the ground-truth skeleton across all frames. On two large egocentric action corpora, the paper reports that HANDI improves hand structure error, visual similarity, temporal consistency, and semantic alignment over state-of-the-art baselines, with runtime comparable to lighter single-stage systems. If correct, this would make on-demand instructional and manipulation videos more reliable for human skill learning and robot imitation.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a two-stage latent video diffusion model that reuses one 3D-UNet noise predictor. Stage 1 outputs the motion-area mask, a soft spatiotemporal region indicating where detailed activity occurs, supervised by a mean-IoU loss plus the standard noise-prediction loss. Stage 2 takes that mask as conditioning and supervises generation with the Hand Refinement Loss, $\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{HR}}=\frac{1}{L}\sum_{l=1}^{L}\frac{1}{J}\|P_l^{\mathrm{gen}}-P_l^{\mathrm{train}}\|_F^2$, comparing hand joint coordinates detected by a frozen detector in generated and training videos. The detector thereby serves triple duty: it creates the pseudo-mask targets, supplies the gradient signal for hand shape, and defines the reported Hand Structure Error metric.

What would settle it

A decisive check is to compare the detector-based Hand Structure Error with human-annotated hand joints on a held-out set of generated videos. If clips with obviously malformed hands still show low detector-based error, because missing or merged joints were zeroed and excluded, then the hand-refinement loss and the headline metric are rewarding the absence of detections rather than correct hand structure.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that hand fidelity in cluttered egocentric video generation can be decomposed into where to move and how to move. Stage one learns where: given the context image and action text, a diffusion model predicts a soft motion-area mask, trained against pseudo-masks built by flood-filling the convex hulls of hand keypoints across the training video and taking their union. Stage two learns how: the same backbone, conditioned on the predicted mask, generates the video while an additional loss measures the mean squared error between the joint coordinates of the generated hand skeleton and the ground-truth skeleton, with missing joints zeroed so they do not contribute. The paper asserts that this division of labor, rather than larger models or longer training, is what lets HANDI render high-fidelity hands in severe clutter and outperform state-of-the-art baselines along all reported measurement axes.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the frozen hand keypoint detector reliably finds the same joints in generated videos and training videos; if it fails on generated hands, the mask supervision, the refinement loss, and the headline hand-quality metric all become unreliable in the same direction.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A user can generate an instructional clip from a single photo of their own workspace and a text command, with no manual mask or trajectory input.
  • Constraining generation to the predicted motion area suppresses background hallucination and keeps the visual context, including object appearance and lighting, matched to the input image.
  • Supervising hand pose explicitly across all frames reduces flicker, blur, and anatomically impossible hand shapes relative to methods that only use pixel-space losses.
  • The two-stage design adds no meaningful latency over single-stage systems: a 16-frame 256-by-256 clip is generated in 8.6 seconds on one H100, close to lighter baselines and faster than several.
  • Because the motion-area mask is learned from image-text pairs rather than supplied by a user, the same pipeline extends to new scenes and new action descriptions without extra annotation effort.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because one frozen detector supplies the mask targets, the training signal, and the evaluation metric, the reported gains are entangled with that detector's blind spots; replacing it or training with synthetic hands with exact joint labels would separate detector behavior from true hand fidelity.
  • The motion-area definition, union of hand hulls, may under-cover actions where the object moves far while the hand stays put, such as rolling dough or sliding a pan; deriving masks from object motion or optical flow would test whether those actions lose generation quality.
  • The predicted mask is a natural control interface: an external planner or human user could edit it to restrict or redirect motion, which suggests applications in robot task specification or content editing that the paper only implicitly enables.
  • Evaluating on novel image-action pairs beyond the dataset's existing clips, as the supplementary begins to do, would test whether the gains are memorization of training pairs or genuine generalization of the motion-area and hand-pose mechanisms.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper introduces HANDI, a two-stage diffusion-based method for hand-centric text-and-image conditioned video generation (HCVG). Stage 1 automatically predicts a spatio-temporal motion-area mask from the input image and text prompt, using pseudo-labels derived from MediaPipe hand keypoints. Stage 2 generates the video conditioned on this mask, and incorporates a Hand Refinement Loss (L_HR) that compares MediaPipe keypoints of the generated video against the ground-truth training video. The method is evaluated on EpicKitchens and Ego4D, with standard video quality metrics (FID, FVD, CLIP scores, BLIP, EgoVLP, CLIP consistency) plus a proposed Hand Structure Error (HS-Err) defined as the same equation as L_HR. The paper reports strong quantitative results and qualitative examples, claiming improvements over state-of-the-art TI2V and T2V baselines.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper makes two useful contributions: an automatic motion-area prediction that avoids manual masks or trajectories, and a lightweight hand-refinement loss that improves hand fidelity in egocentric video generation. The problem is well-motivated and the two-stage design is simple and compute-efficient (8.6s for a 256x256 clip on an H100). The ablations in Table 2, which isolate the effect of the motion-area mask and the HRL, are thoughtful and include evaluation both in the full frame and within the motion area. However, the central claim of improved hand quality rests on a closed evaluation loop: the headline hand metric HS-Err is identical to the training loss L_HR and uses the same MediaPipe detector that generates the training targets. The lack of error bars or significance tests further weakens the quantitative evidence, and the contribution statement overclaims "all measurement axes" when Table 1 shows several cells where baselines outperform HANDI. The paper is clearly written and the ideas are promising, but the evaluation needs to be made independent before the central claim can be accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 4, Metrics; Sec. 3.2, Eq. (2)] The hand-quality metric HS-Err is defined in Sec. 4 as "defined as in Eq. (2)", which is exactly the Hand Refinement Loss L_HR that stage 2 optimizes in Sec. 3.2. Both are computed with the same frozen MediaPipe hand keypoint detector [37] that also generates the pseudo motion-area masks in Sec. 3.1. As a result, the model is explicitly trained to minimize the same function that is later reported as the headline hand-fidelity metric, so the reported advantage in HS-Err (e.g., 0.01512 vs. 0.01716 on EpicKitchens in Table 1) is not independent evidence of improved hand quality. Please add an independent hand-quality evaluation (different hand pose estimator, human study, or a metric that does not use MediaPipe keypoints) and report error bars or significance tests.
  2. [Sec. 3.2, Eq. (2)] The handling of missing joints in Eq. (2) is not consistent with the text. The text states that missing joints "do not contribute to model optimization for this frame", but the formula sums over all J joints without any masking. If both P_gen_l and P_train_l have the same missing joint set to 0, that joint contributes zero error; if only one is missing, it contributes a spurious (detected - 0)^2 term. The same issue affects evaluation: frames in which MediaPipe detects no hand in both videos contribute zero error to HS-Err, potentially deflating the metric for all methods and biasing comparisons. Please clarify the exact masking procedure used in the implementation, and describe how evaluation treats frames with undetected hands.
  3. [Sec. 1, Contributions; Table 1] The contribution statement that HANDI "outperform[s] state of the art ... along all measurement axes" is not supported by Table 1. For instance, on Ego4D, CogVideoX achieves a higher CLIP consistency score (0.9900 vs. 0.9873) and PIA a higher CLIP_Tx score (29.15 vs. 28.63); on EpicKitchens, AVDC has a lower FVD (81.39 vs. 101.89). The caption's wording "across all metrics on at least one benchmark" is ambiguous and does not match the abstract's stronger claim. Please revise the claims to reflect the actual results, or provide statistical evidence for an aggregate superiority.
  4. [Sec. 4.1, Table 1 and Sec. 4.2, Table 2] No error bars, confidence intervals, or significance tests are reported for any quantitative result. Many of the reported differences are small relative to the typical run-to-run variance of FVD and CLIP-based metrics (e.g., CLIPCs 0.9896 vs. 0.9889 in Table 2, row 4 vs. row 3). Since the evaluation sets are finite and the generation is stochastic, the paper should report standard errors over multiple seeds or a paired significance test to establish that the observed gains are not due to chance.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 4.1] The Motion Intensive subset is defined as samples with the top 10% largest M_video (§3.1); please state why this is the appropriate proxy for "motion intensive" rather than, e.g., hand trajectory length or number of hand-object interactions.
  2. [Sec. 3.1] The "prior mask" used as conditioning during stage 1 training is described as the normalized coverage over all groundtruth masks; please clarify whether the same global mask is used for every training sample and how it interacts with the target mask for a given video.
  3. [Fig. 4] In the qualitative comparison, the label "Open Sora" appears, but the caption lists baselines including DynamiCrafter, PIA, AVDC, and AA; please ensure the figure clearly indicates which baseline corresponds to each row and that all methods are consistently labeled.
  4. [Sec. 3] The notation ⊠ for H×W is introduced and used sparingly; it may be simpler to write dimensions explicitly to avoid potential confusion with the tensor product symbol.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

HS-Err, the headline hand-fidelity metric, is defined in Section 4 as Eq. (2), which is exactly the Hand Refinement Loss L_HR that stage 2 minimizes (Eq. (7)); the reported hand-quality advantage is therefore self-referential.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 3.2 Eq. (2), Section 3.3 Eq. (7), Section 4 Metrics]
    "In the end, to evaluate the generated hand quality, we report Hand Structure Error (HS-Err) which is defined as in Eq. (2). ... Lstage2 = Lnoise + ηLHR , (7)"

    HS-Err is not an independent metric; it is literally the training loss LHR from Eq. (2), the MSE between MediaPipe keypoints of generated and ground-truth videos. Eq. (7) shows stage 2 is trained by minimizing Lnoise + ηLHR, i.e., the model is optimized on HS-Err itself. Comparing HANDI's HS-Err with baselines never trained with LHR is comparing a method on its own objective against methods on an alien objective. The same frozen MediaPipe detector supplies keypoints for both the LHR training targets and the HS-Err evaluation, so detector bias or failure modes (missing joints set to 0, excluded) are shared by the training signal and the reported metric.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is largely self-contained: the two-stage diffusion architecture, the automatic motion-area mask generation from hand-keypoint pseudo-labels, and the Hand Refinement Loss are all described with explicit equations, and the quantitative comparison uses standard external metrics (FID, FVD, CLIP, BLIP, EgoVLP) that are not fitted by the method. However, one load-bearing evaluation axis, HS-Err, is self-referential: Section 4 defines HS-Err 'as in Eq. (2)', and Eq. (2) defines the Hand Refinement Loss LHR that stage 2 explicitly minimizes (Eq. (7)). The reported hand-fidelity advantage on HS-Err is therefore a training objective reported as a quality metric, computed with the same MediaPipe detector used to create the training targets. This is a genuine, quotable reduction of a headline claim to its own input, warranting a score of 6 rather than 0-2; the score is not higher because the other metrics (FID, FVD, CLIP, BLIP, EgoVLP, CLIP consistency) are independent of the training losses and still show HANDI competitive or best on several benchmarks. No load-bearing self-citation chain was found: the method is built on cited external components (Stable Diffusion, MediaPipe, AnimateAnything-style conditioning) that are not the authors' own unverified prior results. The weakness is isolated to the hand-fidelity metric being the training loss, a partial circularity in an otherwise non-circular derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The method introduces no new physical entities; it is a combination of existing diffusion backbones, off-the-shelf hand keypoint detection, and two new loss terms. The load-bearing assumptions are the reliability of the hand detector, the adequacy of the hand-hull motion-area definition, and the sufficiency of text/CLIP conditioning. The two free loss weights are tuned on small subsets.

free parameters (2)
  • alpha (L_mIoU weight) = 0.1
    Weight for the pixel-space mask mIoU loss in stage 1; chosen empirically on small subsets of training data.
  • eta (L_HR weight) = 0.1
    Weight for the Hand Refinement Loss in stage 2; chosen empirically on small subsets of training data.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption MediaPipe hand keypoint detector (ref. [37]) provides reliable and sufficient keypoint detections on both training and generated videos.
    The detector generates the pseudo motion-area masks (Sec. 3.1), computes the hand refinement loss (Sec. 3.2), and evaluates the hand-quality metric HS-Err (Sec. 4). If detections are unreliable on generated hands, all three fail in a correlated way.
  • domain assumption The motion area for a hand action is well-approximated by the convex hull of the detected hand keypoints, unioned over all frames of a training clip.
    This defines the pseudo ground-truth masks for stage 1 (Sec. 3.1, Fig. 2). Object-state changes that occur outside the hand hull would be excluded from the motion area.
  • domain assumption Text expansion via the instruction tuning module and CLIP text embedding adequately capture the action semantics for conditioning.
    Used throughout for conditioning the diffusion model (Sec. 3); relies on prior methods [28, 45, 47] without validation in this paper.
  • domain assumption Stable Diffusion v1.5's VAE latent space is an adequate representation for the motion-area masks and video frames.
    The method encodes both masks and videos with the pretrained VAE (Sec. 3); any reconstruction error or information loss is inherited.
  • domain assumption At most two hands appear in any frame, and each hand is fully represented by 21 joints.
    The hand refinement loss assumes J=42 joints per frame (Sec. 3.2), which is aligned with EpicKitchens/Ego4D but may not cover all scenes.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of HANDI: Hand-Centric Text-and-Image Conditioned Video Generation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3TR5QYLN

@misc{pith2026241204189,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: HANDI: Hand-Centric Text-and-Image Conditioned Video Generation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3TR5QYLN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.04189}
}
read the original abstract

Despite the recent strides in video generation, state-of-the-art methods still struggle with elements of visual detail. One particularly challenging case is the class of videos in which the intricate motion of the hand coupled with a mostly stable and otherwise distracting environment is necessary to convey the execution of some complex action and its effects. To address these challenges, we introduce a new method for video generation that focuses on hand-centric actions. Our diffusion-based method incorporates two distinct innovations. First, we propose an automatic method to generate the motion area -- the region in the video in which the detailed activities occur -- guided by both the visual context and the action text prompt, rather than assuming this region can be provided manually as is now commonplace. Second, we introduce a critical Hand Refinement Loss to guide the diffusion model to focus on smooth and consistent hand poses. We evaluate our method on challenging augmented datasets based on EpicKitchens and Ego4D, demonstrating significant improvements over state-of-the-art methods in terms of action clarity, especially of the hand motion in the target region, across diverse environments and actions. Video results can be found in https://excitedbutter.github.io/project_page

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.04189 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Illustration of our proposed Hand-Centric Text-and-Image Conditioned Video Generation (HCVG). Given an image for context [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Training motion area masks are automatically created [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Illustrates the Hand Refinement Loss that drives the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Qualitative results comparing with baselines. Our method generates videos that contain subtle hand motion that corresponds to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The visualization for ablation study showing the inde [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [37]

    Medi- apipe: A framework for building perception pipelines

    Camillo Lugaresi, Jiuqiang Tang, Hadon Nash, Chris Mc- Clanahan, Esha Uboweja, Michael Hays, Fan Zhang, Chuo- Ling Chang, Ming Guang Yong, Juhyun Lee, et al. Medi- apipe: A framework for building perception pipelines. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.08172, 2019. 4, 5, 6

    arXiv 1906

  2. [1]

    The mug facial expression database

    Niki Aifanti, Christos Papachristou, and Anastasios De- lopoulos. The mug facial expression database. In 11th In- ternational Workshop on Image Analysis for Multimedia In- teractive Services WIAMIS 10, pages 1–4. IEEE, 2010. 2

    2010

  3. [2]

    Detours for navigating instructional videos

    Kumar Ashutosh, Zihui Xue, Tushar Nagarajan, and Kris- ten Grauman. Detours for navigating instructional videos. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 18804–18815, 2024. 2

    2024

  4. [3]

    Frozen in time: A joint video and image encoder for end-to-end retrieval

    Max Bain, Arsha Nagrani, G ¨ul Varol, and Andrew Zisser- man. Frozen in time: A joint video and image encoder for end-to-end retrieval. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF inter- national conference on computer vision , pages 1728–1738,

  5. [4]

    Hrs-bench: Holistic, reliable and scalable benchmark for text-to-image models

    Eslam Mohamed Bakr, Pengzhan Sun, Xiaoqian Shen, Faizan Farooq Khan, Li Erran Li, and Mohamed Elhoseiny. Hrs-bench: Holistic, reliable and scalable benchmark for text-to-image models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF In- ternational Conference on Computer Vision , pages 20041– 20053, 2023

    work page 2023

  6. [5]

    Editval: Benchmarking diffusion based text-guided image editing methods

    Samyadeep Basu, Mehrdad Saberi, Shweta Bhardwaj, Atoosa Malemir Chegini, Daniela Massiceti, Maziar San- jabi, Shell Xu Hu, and Soheil Feizi. Editval: Benchmarking diffusion based text-guided image editing methods. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.02426, 2023. 2

    arXiv

  7. [6]

    Brooks, A

    T. Brooks, A. Holynski, and A. A. Efros. Instructpix2pix: Learning to follow image editing instructions. In Proceed- ings of IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pat- tern Recognition, 2023. 2

    work page 2023

  8. [7]

    Gener- ating human motion in 3d scenes from text descriptions

    Zhi Cen, Huaijin Pi, Sida Peng, Zehong Shen, Minghui Yang, Zhu Shuai, Hujun Bao, and Xiaowei Zhou. Gener- ating human motion in 3d scenes from text descriptions. In CVPR, 2024. 3

    work page 2024

Show all 82 references
  1. [8]

    Ceylan, C.-H

    D. Ceylan, C.-H. P. Huang, and N. J. Mitra. Pix2video: Video editing using image diffusion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2023. 3

    2023

  2. [9]

    Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction

    Paul Chandler and John Sweller. Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and instruction , 8(4): 293–332, 1991. 3

    1991

  3. [10]

    Learning video-conditioned policies for unseen manipula- tion tasks

    Elliot Chane-Sane, Cordelia Schmid, and Ivan Laptev. Learning video-conditioned policies for unseen manipula- tion tasks. In ICRA, 2023. 2

    2023

  4. [11]

    Cheikh Youssef, A

    S. Cheikh Youssef, A. Aydin, A. Canning, N. Khan, K. Ahmen, and P. Dasgupta. Learning surgical skills through video-based education: A systematic review. Surgical Inno- vation, 30(2):220–238, 2022. 1

    2022

  5. [12]

    Videocrafter2: Overcoming data limitations for high-quality video diffusion models, 2024

    Haoxin Chen, Yong Zhang, Xiaodong Cun, Menghan Xia, Xintao Wang, Chao Weng, and Ying Shan. Videocrafter2: Overcoming data limitations for high-quality video diffusion models, 2024. 3

    2024

  6. [13]

    Panda-70m: Captioning 70m videos with multiple cross-modality teachers

    Tsai-Shien Chen, Aliaksandr Siarohin, Willi Menapace, Ekaterina Deyneka, Hsiang-wei Chao, Byung Eun Jeon, Yuwei Fang, Hsin-Ying Lee, Jian Ren, Ming-Hsuan Yang, et al. Panda-70m: Captioning 70m videos with multiple cross-modality teachers. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Confere...

    2024

  7. [14]

    Fine-grained open do- main image animation with motion guidance

    Zuozhuo Dai, Zhenghao Zhang, Yao Yao, Bingxue Qiu, Siyu Zhu, Long Qin, and Weizhi Wang. Fine-grained open do- main image animation with motion guidance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.12886, 2023. 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 12

    2023 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Rescaling egocentric vision: Collection, pipeline and chal- lenges for epic-kitchens-100

    Dima Damen, Hazel Doughty, Giovanni Maria Farinella, Antonino Furnari, Evangelos Kazakos, Jian Ma, Davide Moltisanti, Jonathan Munro, Toby Perrett, Will Price, et al. Rescaling egocentric vision: Collection, pipeline and chal- lenges for epic-kitchens-100. International Journa...

    2022

  9. [16]

    Learning universal policies via text-guided video genera- tion

    Yilun Du, Sherry Yang, Bo Dai, Hanjun Dai, Ofir Nachum, Josh Tenenbaum, Dale Schuurmans, and Pieter Abbeel. Learning universal policies via text-guided video genera- tion. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 36, 2024. 3

    2024

  10. [17]

    Structure and content-guided video synthesis with diffusion models

    Patrick Esser, Johnathan Chiu, Parmida Atighehchian, Jonathan Granskog, and Anastasis Germanidis. Structure and content-guided video synthesis with diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 7346–7356, 2023. 3

    2023

  11. [18]

    Handrawer: Lever- aging spatial information to render realistic hands using a conditional diffusion model in single stage, 2025

    Qifan Fu, Xu Chen, Muhammad Asad, Shanxin Yuan, Changjae Oh, and Gregory Slabaugh. Handrawer: Lever- aging spatial information to render realistic hands using a conditional diffusion model in single stage, 2025. 4

    2025

  12. [19]

    Ego4d: Around the world in 3,000 hours of egocentric video

    Kristen Grauman, Andrew Westbury, Eugene Byrne, Zachary Chavis, Antonino Furnari, Rohit Girdhar, Jackson Hamburger, Hao Jiang, Miao Liu, Xingyu Liu, et al. Ego4d: Around the world in 3,000 hours of egocentric video. InPro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision...

    2022

  13. [20]

    Ego-exo4d: Understanding skilled human activity from first-and third-person perspectives

    Kristen Grauman, Andrew Westbury, Lorenzo Torresani, Kris Kitani, Jitendra Malik, Triantafyllos Afouras, Kumar Ashutosh, Vijay Baiyya, Siddhant Bansal, Bikram Boote, et al. Ego-exo4d: Understanding skilled human activity from first-and third-person perspectives. In Proceedings...

    2024

  14. [21]

    Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilib- rium

    Martin Heusel, Hubert Ramsauer, Thomas Unterthiner, Bernhard Nessler, and Sepp Hochreiter. Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilib- rium. Advances in neural information processing systems , 30, 2017. 6

    2017

  15. [22]

    Denoising dif- fusion probabilistic models

    Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel. Denoising dif- fusion probabilistic models. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:6840–6851, 2020. 3

    2020

  16. [23]

    Video dif- fusion models

    Jonathan Ho, Tim Salimans, Alexey Gritsenko, William Chan, Mohammad Norouzi, and David J Fleet. Video dif- fusion models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:8633–8646, 2022. 2, 3

    2022

  17. [24]

    T2i-compbench: A comprehensive bench- mark for open-world compositional text-to-image genera- tion

    Kaiyi Huang, Kaiyue Sun, Enze Xie, Zhenguo Li, and Xihui Liu. T2i-compbench: A comprehensive bench- mark for open-world compositional text-to-image genera- tion. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 36:78723–78747, 2023. 2 9

    2023

  18. [25]

    Vbench: Comprehensive bench- mark suite for video generative models

    Ziqi Huang, Yinan He, Jiashuo Yu, Fan Zhang, Chenyang Si, Yuming Jiang, Yuanhan Zhang, Tianxing Wu, Qingyang Jin, Nattapol Chanpaisit, et al. Vbench: Comprehensive bench- mark suite for video generative models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and P...

    2024

  19. [26]

    Vbench++: Comprehensive and ver- satile benchmark suite for video generative models

    Ziqi Huang, Fan Zhang, Xiaojie Xu, Yinan He, Jiashuo Yu, Ziyue Dong, Qianli Ma, Nattapol Chanpaisit, Chenyang Si, Yuming Jiang, et al. Vbench++: Comprehensive and ver- satile benchmark suite for video generative models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.13503, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Vid2robot: End-to- end video-conditioned policy learning with cross-attention transformers, 2024

    Vidhi Jain, Maria Attarian, Nikhil J Joshi, Ayzaan Wahid, Danny Driess, Quan Vuong, Pannag R Sanketi, Pierre Ser- manet, Stefan Welker, Christine Chan, Igor Gilitschenski, Yonatan Bisk, and Debidatta Dwibedi. Vid2robot: End-to- end video-conditioned policy learning with cross-...

    2024

  21. [28]

    Lego: Learning egocentric action frame generation via visual instruction tuning

    Bolin Lai, Xiaoliang Dai, Lawrence Chen, Guan Pang, James M Rehg, and Miao Liu. Lego: Learning egocentric action frame generation via visual instruction tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.03849, 2023. 2, 3, 5, 6, 12

    2023 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Temporal convolutional networks for ac- tion segmentation and detection

    Colin Lea, Michael D Flynn, Rene Vidal, Austin Reiter, and Gregory D Hager. Temporal convolutional networks for ac- tion segmentation and detection. In proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 156–165, 2017. 3

    2017

  23. [30]

    Gradient-based learning applied to document recog- nition

    Yann LeCun, L ´eon Bottou, Yoshua Bengio, and Patrick Haffner. Gradient-based learning applied to document recog- nition. Proceedings of the IEEE , 86(11):2278–2324, 1998. 3

    1998

  24. [31]

    Holis- tic evaluation of text-to-image models

    Tony Lee, Michihiro Yasunaga, Chenlin Meng, Yifan Mai, Joon Sung Park, Agrim Gupta, Yunzhi Zhang, Deepak Narayanan, Hannah Teufel, Marco Bellagente, et al. Holis- tic evaluation of text-to-image models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2024. 2

    2024

  25. [32]

    Blip: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training for unified vision-language understanding and generation

    Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Caiming Xiong, and Steven Hoi. Blip: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training for unified vision-language understanding and generation. In Interna- tional conference on machine learning, pages 12888–12900. PMLR, 2022. 6, 12

    2022

  26. [33]

    Egocentric video-language pretraining

    Kevin Qinghong Lin, Jinpeng Wang, Mattia Soldan, Michael Wray, Rui Yan, Eric Z Xu, Difei Gao, Rong-Cheng Tu, Wen- zhe Zhao, Weijie Kong, et al. Egocentric video-language pretraining. Advances in Neural Information Processing Sys- tems, 35:7575–7586, 2022. 6

    2022

  27. [34]

    Dpm-solver: A fast ode solver for diffusion probabilistic model sampling in around 10 steps

    Cheng Lu, Yuhao Zhou, Fan Bao, Jianfei Chen, Chongxuan Li, and Jun Zhu. Dpm-solver: A fast ode solver for diffusion probabilistic model sampling in around 10 steps. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 35:5775–5787,

  28. [35]

    Dpm-solver++: Fast solver for guided sampling of diffusion probabilistic models

    Cheng Lu, Yuhao Zhou, Fan Bao, Jianfei Chen, Chongx- uan Li, and Jun Zhu. Dpm-solver++: Fast solver for guided sampling of diffusion probabilistic models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.01095, 2022. 3, 4

    2022 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Handrefiner: Refining malformed hands in generated images by diffusion-based conditional inpainting

    Wenquan Lu, Yufei Xu, Jing Zhang, Chaoyue Wang, and Dacheng Tao. Handrefiner: Refining malformed hands in generated images by diffusion-based conditional inpainting. In ACM Multimedia 2024, 2024. 3, 4

    2024

  30. [38]

    Dexvip: Learning dexterous grasping with human hand pose priors from video

    Priyanka Mandikal and Kristen Grauman. Dexvip: Learning dexterous grasping with human hand pose priors from video. In Conference on Robot Learning, 2021. 3

    2021

  31. [39]

    Recipe1m+: a dataset for learning cross-modal embeddings for cooking recipes and food images

    Javier Marin, Aritro Biswas, Ferda Ofli, Nicholas Hynes, Amaia Salvador, Yusuf Aytar, Ingmar Weber, and Antonio Torralba. Recipe1m+: a dataset for learning cross-modal embeddings for cooking recipes and food images. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.06553, 2018. 3

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    Howto100m: Learning a text-video embedding by watching hundred million narrated video clips

    Antoine Miech, Dimitri Zhukov, Jean-Baptiste Alayrac, Makarand Tapaswi, Ivan Laptev, and Josef Sivic. Howto100m: Learning a text-video embedding by watching hundred million narrated video clips. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pages...

    2019

  33. [41]

    Han- diffuser: Text-to-image generation with realistic hand ap- pearances

    Supreeth Narasimhaswamy, Uttaran Bhattacharya, Xiang Chen, Ishita Dasgupta, Saayan Mitra, and Minh Hoai. Han- diffuser: Text-to-image generation with realistic hand ap- pearances. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 2468...

    2024

  34. [42]

    Conditional image-to-video gener- ation with latent flow diffusion models

    Haomiao Ni, Changhao Shi, Kai Li, Sharon X Huang, and Martin Renqiang Min. Conditional image-to-video gener- ation with latent flow diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 18444–18455, 2023. 3, 6, 7, 12

    2023

  35. [43]

    Ti2v-zero: Zero-shot image condition- ing for text-to-video diffusion models

    Haomiao Ni, Bernhard Egger, Suhas Lohit, Anoop Cherian, Ye Wang, Toshiaki Koike-Akino, Sharon X Huang, and Tim K Marks. Ti2v-zero: Zero-shot image condition- ing for text-to-video diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recogn...

    2024

  36. [44]

    Improved denoising diffusion probabilistic models

    Alexander Quinn Nichol and Prafulla Dhariwal. Improved denoising diffusion probabilistic models. In International conference on machine learning, pages 8162–8171. PMLR,

  37. [45]

    Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervi- sion

    Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, et al. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervi- sion. In International conference on machine learning, ...

    2021

  38. [46]

    The meccano dataset: Understanding human-object interactions from egocentric videos in an industrial-like domain

    Francesco Ragusa, Antonino Furnari, Salvatore Livatino, and Giovanni Maria Farinella. The meccano dataset: Understanding human-object interactions from egocentric videos in an industrial-like domain. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer ...

    2021

  39. [47]

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models

    Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Bj ¨orn Ommer. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 10684–10695, 2022. 2, 3, 4, 6 10

    2022

  40. [48]

    Photorealistic text-to-image diffusion models with deep language understanding

    Chitwan Saharia, William Chan, Saurabh Saxena, Lala Li, Jay Whang, Emily L Denton, Kamyar Ghasemipour, Raphael Gontijo Lopes, Burcu Karagol Ayan, Tim Salimans, et al. Photorealistic text-to-image diffusion models with deep language understanding. Advances in neural information...

    2022

  41. [49]

    Laion-400m: Open dataset of clip-filtered 400 million image-text pairs

    Christoph Schuhmann, Richard Vencu, Romain Beaumont, Robert Kaczmarczyk, Clayton Mullis, Aarush Katta, Theo Coombes, Jenia Jitsev, and Aran Komatsuzaki. Laion-400m: Open dataset of clip-filtered 400 million image-text pairs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.02114, 2021. 2

    2021 arXiv

  42. [50]

    As- sembly101: A large-scale multi-view video dataset for un- derstanding procedural activities

    Fadime Sener, Dibyadip Chatterjee, Daniel Shelepov, Kun He, Dipika Singhania, Robert Wang, and Angela Yao. As- sembly101: A large-scale multi-view video dataset for un- derstanding procedural activities. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern ...

    2022

  43. [51]

    Make-a-video: Text-to-video generation without text-video data

    Uriel Singer, Adam Polyak, Thomas Hayes, Xi Yin, Jie An, Songyang Zhang, Qiyuan Hu, Harry Yang, Oron Ashual, Oran Gafni, et al. Make-a-video: Text-to-video generation without text-video data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14792 ,

    arXiv

  44. [52]

    Many turn to youtube for children’s content, news, how-to lessons.Pew Research Center, 7, 2018

    Aaron Smith, Skye Toor, and Patrick Van Kessel. Many turn to youtube for children’s content, news, how-to lessons.Pew Research Center, 7, 2018. 2

    2018

  45. [53]

    Denoising diffusion implicit models

    Jiaming Song, Chenlin Meng, and Stefano Ermon. Denoising diffusion implicit models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02502, 2020

    2010 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Videoagent: Self-improving video generation

    Achint Soni, Sreyas Venkataraman, Abhranil Chandra, Se- bastian Fischmeister, Percy Liang, Bo Dai, and Sherry Yang. Videoagent: Self-improving video generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.10076, 2024. 3

    2024 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Genhowto: Learning to generate actions and state transformations from instructional videos

    Tom ´aˇs Sou ˇcek, Dima Damen, Michael Wray, Ivan Laptev, and Josef Sivic. Genhowto: Learning to generate actions and state transformations from instructional videos. In 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pat- tern Recognition (CVPR), pages 6561–6571. IEEE, 2024. 2, 3

    2024

  48. [56]

    Fvd: A new metric for video generation

    Thomas Unterthiner, Sjoerd van Steenkiste, Karol Kurach, Rapha¨el Marinier, Marcin Michalski, and Sylvain Gelly. Fvd: A new metric for video generation. In ICLR Workshop on Deep Generative Models for Structured Data (DeepGen- Struct), 2019. 6

    2019

  49. [57]

    Long-term temporal convolutions for action recognition

    G ¨ul Varol, Ivan Laptev, and Cordelia Schmid. Long-term temporal convolutions for action recognition. IEEE trans- actions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 40(6): 1510–1517, 2017. 3

    2017

  50. [58]

    Attention is all you need

    A Vaswani. Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017. 3

    2017

  51. [59]

    Imagen editor and editbench: Advancing and evaluating text-guided im- age inpainting

    Su Wang, Chitwan Saharia, Ceslee Montgomery, Jordi Pont- Tuset, Shai Noy, Stefano Pellegrini, Yasumasa Onoe, Sarah Laszlo, David J Fleet, Radu Soricut, et al. Imagen editor and editbench: Advancing and evaluating text-guided im- age inpainting. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF c...

    2023

  52. [60]

    Holoassist: an egocentric human interaction dataset for interactive ai assistants in the real world supple- mentary material

    Xin Wang, Taein Kwon, Mahdi Rad1 Bowen Pan, Ishani Chakraborty, Sean Andrist, Dan Bohus1 Ashley Feniello, Bugra Tekin, Felipe Vieira Frujeri, and Neel Joshi1 Marc Pollefeys. Holoassist: an egocentric human interaction dataset for interactive ai assistants in the real world sup...

  53. [61]

    Multi- modal augmented-reality assembly guidance based on bare- hand interface

    Xuan Wang, SK Ong, and Andrew Yeh-Ching Nee. Multi- modal augmented-reality assembly guidance based on bare- hand interface. Advanced Engineering Informatics , 30(3): 406–421, 2016. 1

    2016

  54. [62]

    Holoassist: an egocen- tric human interaction dataset for interactive ai assistants in the real world

    Xin Wang, Taein Kwon, Mahdi Rad, Bowen Pan, Ishani Chakraborty, Sean Andrist, Dan Bohus, Ashley Feniello, Bu- gra Tekin, Felipe Vieira Frujeri, et al. Holoassist: an egocen- tric human interaction dataset for interactive ai assistants in the real world. In Proceedings of the I...

  55. [63]

    Videocomposer: Compositional video synthesis with motion controllability

    Xiang Wang, Hangjie Yuan, Shiwei Zhang, Dayou Chen, Ji- uniu Wang, Yingya Zhang, Yujun Shen, Deli Zhao, and Jin- gren Zhou. Videocomposer: Compositional video synthesis with motion controllability. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2024. 3

    2024

  56. [64]

    Egovid-5m: A large-scale video-action dataset for egocentric video generation

    Xiaofeng Wang, Kang Zhao, Feng Liu, Jiayu Wang, Gu- osheng Zhao, Xiaoyi Bao, Zheng Zhu, Yingya Zhang, and Xingang Wang. Egovid-5m: A large-scale video-action dataset for egocentric video generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.08380, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Lavie: High-quality video generation with cascaded latent diffusion models

    Yaohui Wang, Xinyuan Chen, Xin Ma, Shangchen Zhou, Ziqi Huang, Yi Wang, Ceyuan Yang, Yinan He, Jiashuo Yu, Peiqing Yang, et al. Lavie: High-quality video generation with cascaded latent diffusion models. International Journal of Computer Vision, pages 1–20, 2024. 2, 3

    2024

  58. [66]

    Towards a better metric for text-to-video generation

    Jay Zhangjie Wu, Guian Fang, Haoning Wu, Xintao Wang, Yixiao Ge, Xiaodong Cun, David Junhao Zhang, Jia-Wei Liu, Yuchao Gu, Rui Zhao, et al. Towards a better metric for text-to-video generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.07781,

    arXiv

  59. [67]

    Freeinit: Bridging initialization gap in video dif- fusion models

    Tianxing Wu, Chenyang Si, Yuming Jiang, Ziqi Huang, and Ziwei Liu. Freeinit: Bridging initialization gap in video dif- fusion models. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 378–394, 2024

    2024

  60. [68]

    Dynamicrafter: Animating open-domain images with video diffusion priors

    Jinbo Xing, Menghan Xia, Yong Zhang, Haoxin Chen, Xin- tao Wang, Tien-Tsin Wong, and Ying Shan. Dynamicrafter: Animating open-domain images with video diffusion priors

  61. [69]

    X-gen: Ego-centric video prediction by watching exo-centric videos

    Jilan Xu, Yifei Huang, Baoqi Pei, Junlin Hou, Qingqiu Li, Guo Chen, Yuejie Zhang, Rui Feng, and Weidi Xie. X-gen: Ego-centric video prediction by watching exo-centric videos. In The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2025

    2025

  62. [70]

    Ad- vancing high-resolution video-language representation with large-scale video transcriptions

    Hongwei Xue, Tiankai Hang, Yanhong Zeng, Yuchong Sun, Bei Liu, Huan Yang, Jianlong Fu, and Baining Guo. Ad- vancing high-resolution video-language representation with large-scale video transcriptions. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Rec...

    2022

  63. [71]

    Stat: Spatial-temporal attention mechanism for video cap- 11 tioning

    Chenggang Yan, Yunbin Tu, Xingzheng Wang, Yongbing Zhang, Xinhong Hao, Yongdong Zhang, and Qionghai Dai. Stat: Spatial-temporal attention mechanism for video cap- 11 tioning. IEEE transactions on multimedia , 22(1):229–241,

  64. [72]

    Learn- ing interactive real-world simulators

    Mengjiao Yang, Yilun Du, Kamyar Ghasemipour, Jonathan Tompson, Dale Schuurmans, and Pieter Abbeel. Learn- ing interactive real-world simulators. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.06114, 2023. 2

    2023 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Annotated hands for generative models

    Yue Yang, Atith N Gandhi, and Greg Turk. Annotated hands for generative models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.15075 ,

    arXiv

  66. [74]

    Cogvideox: Text-to-video diffusion models with an expert transformer

    Zhuoyi Yang, Jiayan Teng, Wendi Zheng, Ming Ding, Shiyu Huang, Jiazheng Xu, Yuanming Yang, Wenyi Hong, Xiao- han Zhang, Guanyu Feng, et al. Cogvideox: Text-to-video diffusion models with an expert transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06072, 2024. 6, 7, 8

    2024 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Learning universal policies via text-guided video generation

    Du Yilun, Yang Mengjiao, Dai Bo, Dai Hanjun, Nachum Ofir, Tenenbaum Joshua B, Dale Schuurmans, and Pieter Abbeel. Learning universal policies via text-guided video generation. arXiv e-prints, pages arXiv–2302, 2023. 6, 7, 8, 12

    2023

  68. [76]

    Dragnuwa: Fine-grained control in video generation by integrating text, image, and trajectory

    Shengming Yin, Chenfei Wu, Jian Liang, Jie Shi, Houqiang Li, Gong Ming, and Nan Duan. Dragnuwa: Fine-grained control in video generation by integrating text, image, and trajectory. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.08089, 2023. 2, 3

    2023 arXiv

  69. [77]

    D. J. Zhang, J. Z. Wu, J.-W. Liu, R. Zhao, L. Ran, Y . Gu, D. Gao, and M. Z. Shou. Show-1: Marrying pixel and latent diffusion models for text-to-video generation. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2024. 2, 3

    2024

  70. [78]

    Motiondif- fuse: Text-driven human motion generation with diffusion model

    Mingyuan Zhang, Zhongang Cai, Liang Pan, Fangzhou Hong, Xinying Guo, Lei Yang, and Ziwei Liu. Motiondif- fuse: Text-driven human motion generation with diffusion model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.15001, 2022. 3

    2022 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Pia: Your personalized image animator via plug-and-play modules in text-to-image models

    Yiming Zhang, Zhening Xing, Yanhong Zeng, Youqing Fang, and Kai Chen. Pia: Your personalized image animator via plug-and-play modules in text-to-image models. In Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 7747–7756, 2024. 2, 3, 6...

    2024

  72. [80]

    Open-sora: Democratizing efficient video production for all, 2024

    Zangwei Zheng, Xiangyu Peng, Tianji Yang, Chenhui Shen, Shenggui Li, Hongxin Liu, Yukun Zhou, Tianyi Li, and Yang You. Open-sora: Democratizing efficient video production for all, 2024. 6, 7, 8

    2024

  73. [81]

    Towards automatic learning of procedures from web instructional videos

    Luowei Zhou, Chenliang Xu, and Jason Corso. Towards automatic learning of procedures from web instructional videos. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2018. 2, 3

    2018

  74. [82]

    Motion control for enhanced complex action video generation

    Qiang Zhou, Shaofeng Zhang, Nianzu Yang, Ye Qian, and Hao Li. Motion control for enhanced complex action video generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.08328, 2024. A. BLIP Score with Different BLIP Model Size BLIP Score [28] leverage pre-trained BLIP model [32] to evaluate how c...

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.