Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 51 references

Hipandas: Hyperspectral Image Joint Denoising and Super-Resolution by Image Fusion with the Panchromatic Image

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single network jointly denoises and super-resolves hyperspectral images, outperforming sequential pipelines by over 2 dB.

desk verdict A genuinely new joint task with a zero-shot method that beats sequential baselines on simulated data; the self-supervised losses lack an identifiability guarantee, but the empirical comparison largely holds up. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.04201 v1 pith:5MFQME4T submitted 2024-12-05 cs.CV eess.IV

Shuang Xu , Zixiang Zhao , Haowen Bai , Chang Yu , Jiangjun Peng , Xiangyong Cao , Deyu Meng This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CVeess.IV
keywords hyperspectralimagepansharpeningdenoisingsuper-resolutionzero-shotlearninglow-rankpriorfusionremotesensing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces Hipandas, a single framework that jointly denoises and super-resolves noisy, low-resolution hyperspectral images (HSIs) using a high-resolution panchromatic image as a guide. Because real satellites such as PRISMA produce noisy low-resolution HSIs alongside sharp PAN images, applying denoising and super-resolution sequentially lets errors accumulate; Hipandas performs both tasks at once and claims to avoid that buildup. The method is zero-shot, requiring no paired ground-truth training data, only the observed noisy HSI and the PAN image, and it works on real PRISMA data. The authors report that ZSHipandas reaches 40.61 dB PSNR versus 38.34 dB for the best sequential baseline under i.i.d. Gaussian noise with σ = 10.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the detail-oriented low-rank prior: for an HRHS image $H$ with downsampled LRHS $L$, the clean detail map $D = H - L\uparrow$ has a steep singular-value energy curve, meaning it is strongly low-rank, while noise flattens that curve. The networks GDN and GSRN are built as guided low-rank matrix factorization networks whose output is the product of $r$ base images and spectral coefficients, with $r \ll b$ enforcing low rank; GSRN injects details as $\hat{H} = \hat{L}\uparrow + f(\hat{L}\uparrow, P)$, where $f$ is the predicted detail map. The PRN, a stack of five convolutions, reconstructs the PAN image from the HSI to keep the restored image spectrally consistent with the observed PAN. Training uses an $\ell^1$ reconstruction of the noisy input through the low-rank bottleneck, the downsampling consistency loss $\|\hat{H}\downarrow - \hat{L}\|_F^2$, and Sobel-gradient losses that preserve PAN high frequencies.

What would settle it

On a simulated dataset with known ground truth $H$, construct a scene where one spectral band contains high-frequency spatial detail that is invisible in the PAN image, such as a sharp pattern that cancels under downsampling, and check whether ZSHipandas restores it; if the output matches $\hat{L}$ and $P$ but fails to reproduce $H$, the self-supervised losses are insufficient to determine the true image.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that a clean, high-resolution hyperspectral image can be reconstructed from a noisy low-resolution HSI and a high-resolution PAN image by a single zero-shot network, and that the detail map—defined as the difference between the high-resolution image and the upsampled low-resolution image—is itself approximately low-rank. The paper builds the guided denoising and super-resolution networks as low-rank matrix factorizations whose output is $\hat{L} = V \times_3 U$, with a PAN-fusion branch generating the base images $V$ and a spectral coefficient branch generating $U$, while a separate PAN reconstruction network enforces that the restored HSI can reproduce the observed PAN image. A two-stage training procedure, pretraining at low resolution and finetuning at high resolution, prevents the super-resolution network from learning a bias toward noise. The result is a method that beats the best sequential combination of state-of-the-art denoisers and pansharpening networks by over 2 dB in PSNR on simulated data and produces visually cleaner, less spectrally distorted images on real PRISMA data.

Load-bearing premise

The self-supervised losses—reconstructing the noisy input through a low-rank bottleneck and matching the downsampled output to the denoised low-resolution image—are assumed to be enough to recover the true clean high-resolution image, so that no signal is lost while noise is removed and the added high-frequency detail is genuine rather than hallucinated.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Treating denoising and super-resolution jointly avoids the error accumulation seen when the two tasks are applied sequentially, so the framework is more directly suited to real satellite acquisition chains.
  • Because the method is zero-shot, a noisy low-resolution HSI and its PAN image are sufficient for restoration, removing the need for large paired training sets of clean high-resolution hyperspectral images.
  • Ablation results indicate that the two-stage training strategy is critical: removing pretraining drops PSNR from 40.61 to 35.94 dB under i.i.d. Gaussian noise with σ = 10.
  • The low-rank modeling of the detail map contributes about 3.6 dB over a plain CNN architecture, and removing PAN fusion costs about 6.8 dB, showing both priors are load-bearing.
  • Joint training improves denoising itself: ZSHipandas achieves 41.68 dB on the denoised LRHS image versus 40.67 dB for a network trained only for denoising, demonstrating synergy between the two tasks.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The detail-oriented low-rank prior could transfer to other guided fusion problems, such as multispectral-plus-panchromatic sharpening or RGB-guided depth super-resolution, where the residual detail map may also exhibit strong low-rank structure.
  • Because training is zero-shot and uses only a single image pair, the same framework might adapt to video or multi-frame fusion with a guide image, though temporal consistency would require additional constraints.
  • One implicit risk is that the PAN reconstruction loss could encourage the restored HSI to reproduce the PAN's spatial structure exactly, potentially eroding spectral details that have no counterpart in the PAN image; testing on scenes with such details would delineate the method's limits.
  • The reported 1 dB improvement of joint training over denoising alone suggests the super-resolution guidance regularizes denoising; ablating the capacity of the detail branch could quantify how much of this synergy depends specifically on the low-rank detail prior.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes Hipandas, a zero-shot framework for joint denoising and super-resolution of noisy low-resolution hyperspectral images (LRHS) using a high-resolution panchromatic (PAN) image as guidance. The method comprises three interconnected networks: a guided denoising network (GDN), a guided super-resolution network (GSRN), and a PAN reconstruction network (PRN), trained with self-supervised losses in a two-stage procedure. The key novelty is a detail-oriented low-rank prior enforced through a low-rank factorization in the GSRN's detail branch. Experiments on simulated data (Gaussian and mixture noise) report consistent improvements over sequential baselines, e.g., PSNR 40.61 dB vs. 38.34 dB for the best baseline under i.i.d. Gaussian noise σ=10 (Table 2), plus a qualitative result on a real PRISMA scene.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper makes a practical contribution by addressing a more realistic imaging scenario (simultaneous noise and low resolution) in a zero-shot manner, and the reported gains over sequential pipelines are substantial (1–3 dB across noise levels). The detail low-rank prior is a novel architectural idea, and the ablation study shows that removing it degrades performance by 3.6 dB. However, the self-supervised objective lacks an identifiability guarantee: the losses in Sec. 3.3 do not by themselves single out the true clean HRHS image, and the real-data evaluation is only qualitative. The paper's strengths are its clear problem formulation, the two-stage training strategy with supporting ablations, and reproducible simulated experiments; its main weakness is the absence of a theoretical or empirical analysis of the ambiguity in the super-resolution loss.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.3, Eq. (8)] The super-resolution loss L_S^(2) = ||Hhat↓ − Lhat||_F^2 constrains only the downsampled output. Any high-frequency detail δ with δ↓ = 0 yields exactly the same loss, and the only constraints on δ are the rank-12 low-rank bottleneck of the detail branch (Sec. 3.4) and the PAN gradient losses (Eqs. 5 and 9), which match edges rather than absolute values. The manuscript provides no identifiability argument showing that the true H is uniquely determined by these losses, so the zero-shot claim that the method recovers the clean HRHS image (rather than a visually pleasing but inaccurate sharpened version) is not established. Please add an analysis of the null space of the downsampling operator and how the rank constraint and PAN losses resolve it, or temper the claim and discuss this limitation explicitly.
  2. [Sec. 3.4] The claim that the clean detail map D = H − L↑ is inherently low-rank is supported only by qualitative energy curves in Fig. 3. There is no quantitative measure (e.g., effective rank, singular-value decay rate) or comparison with alternative priors, and the rank r=12 for the GSRN is chosen without a sensitivity analysis. This is load-bearing because the detail branch is the only high-frequency constraint beyond the PAN gradient terms, so the validity of the detail low-rank prior directly affects the plausibility of the recovered H. Please provide quantitative evidence for the low-rankness of D and an ablation over r.
  3. [Sec. 4.2] The real-world experiment on the PRISMA Kanpur scene is evaluated only with the no-reference PIQE metric and visual inspection. Since the paper's central claim is that the method yields 'more accurate' HRHS images, this evidence does not confirm accuracy on real data, where no ground truth is available and the identifiability concern from Eq. (8) is most acute. Please either provide a quantitative accuracy assessment on real data (e.g., using a scene with known reference targets or cross-sensor validation) or clearly state that the real-data results are qualitative and that accuracy is only validated on simulated data.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 4.1] The text contains 'Fig. Fig. 6' which should be 'Fig. 6'.
  2. [Sec. 4.4] The sentence 'employing only the GRN component' should read 'GDN component' to match the notation.
  3. [Sec. 4.2] The phrase 'Restored images by still preserve the unpleasant color' is ungrammatical and should be rewritten.
  4. [Sec. 3.2] The PRN is described as '5 stacked Conv units' without specifying kernel sizes, strides, or activation details; please provide a complete architectural description or refer to a supplementary document.
  5. [Sec. 3.3, Eq. (6)] In stage 1, Lhat is used as pseudo ground truth to train the GSRN on downsampled versions of itself; the manuscript should clarify why this self-referential training does not simply drive the GSRN toward the identity mapping.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the central comparative claim rests on external ground-truth evaluation, and the self-supervised losses are not fitted inputs renamed as predictions.

full rationale

The paper's claimed derivation chain reconstructs a clean HRHS image H from noisy LRHS N and HRPAN P using GDN, GSRN, and PRN with losses in Eqs. (4), (5), (8), and (9). The central claim that ZSHipandas outperforms sequential baselines is evaluated against known ground truth H on simulated data (Tables 2–3), and on a real PRISMA patch via a no-reference metric; no ground-truth value or fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Stage 1 uses the denoised output Lhat as pseudo ground truth for super-resolution pretraining (Eq. 6), and Stage 2 enforces only downsampling consistency (Eq. 8); this is a self-supervised identifiability assumption, not a circular reduction, because H is never observed during training and the evaluation is external. The detail low-rank prior is an empirical observation from Fig. 3 rather than a consequence of the objective, and it is built into the architecture rather than fitted to the test output. Self-citations ([26], [32], [44], [45]) appear in related work and as compared baselines, but they do not carry the central argument; the low-rank HSI prior is also supported by external citations. The concern that any Hhat = Lhat↑ + δ with δ↓ = 0 satisfies Eq. (8) is a robustness/identifiability limitation of the self-supervised losses, not a case where the prediction reduces to its inputs by construction. Overall, no load-bearing circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the degradation model, the PAN-HS texture similarity, the low-rank detail prior, and the sufficiency of self-supervised losses. The ranks and channel count are hand-chosen hyperparameters, not fitted to the target. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • GDN rank r = 3
    Chosen by hand; controls the low-rank bottleneck strength for denoising and directly affects how much noise is removed versus signal preserved.
  • GSRN rank r = 12
    Chosen by hand; controls the capacity of the detail map representation and the expressiveness of the super-resolution network.
  • Number of channels in networks = 128
    Chosen by hand; a capacity hyperparameter for all three networks.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The observed noisy low-resolution HSI is modeled as N = H down + epsilon, where H is the clean HRHS and epsilon is noise.
    Standard imaging degradation model used throughout Sec. 3.1; not verified against real sensor physics in the paper.
  • domain assumption PAN and HS images share similar spatial textures, so PAN can guide denoising and super-resolution.
    Invoked in the design of GDN and GSRN fusion layers and in the PRN texture losses (Sec. 3.2, 3.3).
  • ad hoc to paper The detail map D = H - L up is inherently low-rank for natural HSI data.
    Introduced in Sec. 3.4 and justified only by energy curves in Fig. 3; no quantitative rank analysis or theoretical argument is provided.
  • ad hoc to paper The self-supervised losses (reconstruction of noisy input, downsampling consistency, PAN reconstruction) are sufficient to train the networks to recover the true clean HRHS image.
    Core training assumption in Sec. 3.3; the paper acknowledges the lack of ground truth but does not prove identifiability.
  • domain assumption A learned PRN network can adequately model the spectral relationship between PAN and HS images.
    Used in Sec. 3.2 to replace the fixed spectral response matrix assumption, which the paper notes is inaccurate for many satellites.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Hipandas: Hyperspectral Image Joint Denoising and Super-Resolution by Image Fusion with the Panchromatic Image." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5MFQME4T

@misc{pith2026241204201,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Hipandas: Hyperspectral Image Joint Denoising and Super-Resolution by Image Fusion with the Panchromatic Image},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5MFQME4T}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.04201}
}
read the original abstract

Hyperspectral images (HSIs) are frequently noisy and of low resolution due to the constraints of imaging devices. Recently launched satellites can concurrently acquire HSIs and panchromatic (PAN) images, enabling the restoration of HSIs to generate clean and high-resolution imagery through fusing PAN images for denoising and super-resolution. However, previous studies treated these two tasks as independent processes, resulting in accumulated errors. This paper introduces \textbf{H}yperspectral \textbf{I}mage Joint \textbf{Pand}enoising \textbf{a}nd Pan\textbf{s}harpening (Hipandas), a novel learning paradigm that reconstructs HRHS images from noisy low-resolution HSIs (LRHS) and high-resolution PAN images. The proposed zero-shot Hipandas framework consists of a guided denoising network, a guided super-resolution network, and a PAN reconstruction network, utilizing an HSI low-rank prior and a newly introduced detail-oriented low-rank prior. The interconnection of these networks complicates the training process, necessitating a two-stage training strategy to ensure effective training. Experimental results on both simulated and real-world datasets indicate that the proposed method surpasses state-of-the-art algorithms, yielding more accurate and visually pleasing HRHS images.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.04201 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The differences among (a) pansharpening, (b) pandenoising and (c) Hipandas. Pansharpening addresses super-resolution, while [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The framework for the proposed ZSHipandas. It is pretrained in stage 1 on LR scale images, and then finetuned in stage 2 on HR [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The energy curve of clean and corrupted detail maps [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The architecture for the (a) GDN/GSRN component, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Restoration results for Gaussian noise with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Restoration results for mixture noise with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Results on the real-world dataset, Kanpur. PIQE is displayed in the left-upper corner, and lower PIQE indicates better results. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Naveed Akhtar, Faisal Shafait, and Ajmal S. Mian. Bayesian sparse representation for hyperspectral image super resolu- tion. In CVPR, pages 3631–3640, 2015. 2

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    Naveed Akhtar, Faisal Shafait, and Ajmal S. Mian. Hier- archical beta process with gaussian process prior for hyper- spectral image super resolution. In ECCV, pages 103–120,

    work page

  3. [3]

    Deep spatial-spectral global reasoning network for hyper- spectral image denoising

    Xiangyong Cao, Xueyang Fu, Chen Xu, and Deyu Meng. Deep spatial-spectral global reasoning network for hyper- spectral image denoising. IEEE TGRS, 60:1–14, 2022. 2

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Zero-shot hy- perspectral sharpening

    Renwei Dian, Anjing Guo, and Shutao Li. Zero-shot hy- perspectral sharpening. IEEE TPAMI, 45(10):12650–12666,

    work page

  5. [5]

    Spec- tral super-resolution via model-guided cross-fusion network

    Renwei Dian, Tianci Shan, Wei He, and Haibo Liu. Spec- tral super-resolution via model-guided cross-fusion network. IEEE TNNLS, 35(7):10059–10070, 2024. 1

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Learning a deep convolutional network for image super-resolution

    Chao Dong, Chen Change Loy, Kaiming He, and Xiaoou Tang. Learning a deep convolutional network for image super-resolution. In ECCV, pages 184–199, 2014. 2

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    Fusion of hyperspectral and panchromatic im- ages using generative adversarial network and image seg- mentation

    Wenqian Dong, Yufei Yang, Jiahui Qu, Weiying Xie, and Yunsong Li. Fusion of hyperspectral and panchromatic im- ages using generative adversarial network and image seg- mentation. IEEE TGRS, 60:5508413, 2022. 2

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    MIMO-SST: multi-input multi-output spatial-spectral transformer for hyperspectral and multispectral image fu- sion

    Jian Fang, Jingxiang Yang, Abdolraheem Khader, and Liang Xiao. MIMO-SST: multi-input multi-output spatial-spectral transformer for hyperspectral and multispectral image fu- sion. IEEE TGRS, 62:5510020, 2024. 1

    work page 2024

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    Atkinson, and Jon Atli Benediktsson

    Pedram Ghamisi, Behnood Rasti, Naoto Yokoya, Qunming Wang, Bernhard Hofle, Lorenzo Bruzzone, Francesca Bo- volo, Mingmin Chi, Katharina Anders, Richard Gloaguen, Peter M. Atkinson, and Jon Atli Benediktsson. Multisource and multitemporal data fusion in remote sensing: A compre...

    2019

  2. [10]

    Band-wise hyperspectral image pansharp- ening using CNN model propagation

    Giuseppe Guarino, Matteo Ciotola, Gemine Vivone, and Giuseppe Scarpa. Band-wise hyperspectral image pansharp- ening using CNN model propagation. IEEE TGRS , 62: 5500518, 2024. 2, 7

    2024

  3. [11]

    Spectral response function-guided deep optimization-driven network for spectral super-resolution

    Jiang He, Jie Li, Qiangqiang Yuan, Huanfeng Shen, and Liangpei Zhang. Spectral response function-guided deep optimization-driven network for spectral super-resolution. IEEE TNNLS, 33(9):4213–4227, 2022. 6

    2022

  4. [12]

    Two spectral-spatial implicit neural representations for arbitrary-resolution hyperspectral pansharpening

    Lin He, Zhou Fang, Jun Li, Jocelyn Chanussot, and Antonio Plaza. Two spectral-spatial implicit neural representations for arbitrary-resolution hyperspectral pansharpening. IEEE TGRS, 62:5513621, 2024. 1

    2024

  5. [13]

    Non-local meets global: An iterative paradigm for hyperspectral image restoration

    Wei He, Quanming Yao, Chao Li, Naoto Yokoya, Qibin Zhao, Hongyan Zhang, and Liangpei Zhang. Non-local meets global: An iterative paradigm for hyperspectral image restoration. IEEE TPAMI, 44(4):2089–2107, 2022. 2

    2022

  6. [14]

    Hyperspectral image super-resolution via intrafusion network

    Jing Hu, Xiuping Jia, Yunsong Li, Gang He, and Minghua Zhao. Hyperspectral image super-resolution via intrafusion network. IEEE TGRS, 58(10):7459–7471, 2020. 2

    2020

  7. [15]

    Learn- ing spatial-spectral prior for super-resolution of hyperspec- tral imagery

    Junjun Jiang, He Sun, Xianming Liu, and Jiayi Ma. Learn- ing spatial-spectral prior for super-resolution of hyperspec- tral imagery. IEEE TCI, 6:1082–1096, 2020. 2

    2020

  8. [16]

    Spatial-spectral transformer for hyperspectral image denoising

    Miaoyu Li, Ying Fu, and Yulun Zhang. Spatial-spectral transformer for hyperspectral image denoising. In AAAI, pages 1368–1376, 2023. 2

    2023

  9. [17]

    Spectral enhanced rectangle transformer for hyperspectral image denoising

    Miaoyu Li, Ji Liu, Ying Fu, Yulun Zhang, and Dejing Dou. Spectral enhanced rectangle transformer for hyperspectral image denoising. In CVPR, pages 5805–5814, 2023. 2

    2023

  10. [18]

    Exploring the rela- tionship between 2d/3d convolution for hyperspectral image super-resolution

    Qiang Li, Qi Wang, and Xuelong Li. Exploring the rela- tionship between 2d/3d convolution for hyperspectral image super-resolution. IEEE TGRS, 59(10):8693–8703, 2021. 2

    2021

  11. [19]

    Hyperspectral and panchromatic images fusion based on the dual condi- tional diffusion models

    Shuangliang Li, Siwei Li, and Lihao Zhang. Hyperspectral and panchromatic images fusion based on the dual condi- tional diffusion models. IEEE TGRS, 61:5526315, 2023. 2

    2023

  12. [20]

    Hyperspectral image super-resolution using deep convo- lutional neural network

    Yunsong Li, Jing Hu, Xi Zhao, Weiying Xie, and Jiaojiao Li. Hyperspectral image super-resolution using deep convo- lutional neural network. Neurocomputing, 266:29–41, 2017. 2

    2017

  13. [21]

    Swinir: Image restora- tion using swin transformer

    Jingyun Liang, Jiezhang Cao, Guolei Sun, Kai Zhang, Luc Van Gool, and Radu Timofte. Swinir: Image restora- tion using swin transformer. In ICCVW, pages 1833–1844,

  14. [22]

    Cascaded convolutional neural network- based hyperspectral image resolution enhancement via an auxiliary panchromatic image

    Xiaochen Lu, Junping Zhang, Dezheng Yang, Longting Xu, and Fengde Jia. Cascaded convolutional neural network- based hyperspectral image resolution enhancement via an auxiliary panchromatic image. IEEE TIP , 30:6815–6828,

  15. [23]

    Hyperspectral image spatial super-resolution via 3d full convolutional neural network

    Shaohui Mei, Xin Yuan, Jingyu Ji, Yifan Zhang, Shuai Wan, and Qian Du. Hyperspectral image spatial super-resolution via 3d full convolutional neural network. Remote. Sens., 9 (11):1139, 2017. 2

    2017

  16. [24]

    DDS2M: self-supervised denoising diffusion spatio- spectral model for hyperspectral image restoration

    Yuchun Miao, Lefei Zhang, Liangpei Zhang, and Dacheng Tao. DDS2M: self-supervised denoising diffusion spatio- spectral model for hyperspectral image restoration. In ICCV, pages 12052–12062, 2023. 2

    2023

  17. [25]

    Trq3dnet: A 3d quasi-recurrent and transformer based network for hyper- spectral image denoising

    Li Pang, Weizhen Gu, and Xiangyong Cao. Trq3dnet: A 3d quasi-recurrent and transformer based network for hyper- spectral image denoising. Remote. Sens., 14(18):4598, 2022. 2

    2022

  18. [26]

    Hir-diff: Unsupervised hyper- spectral image restoration via improved diffusion models

    Li Pang, Xiangyu Rui, Long Cui, Hongzhong Wang, Deyu Meng, and Xiangyong Cao. Hir-diff: Unsupervised hyper- spectral image restoration via improved diffusion models. In CVPR, pages 3005–3014, 2024. 2, 7

    2024

  19. [27]

    Patel and Manjunath V

    Rakesh C. Patel and Manjunath V . Joshi. Super-resolution of hyperspectral images: Use of optimum wavelet filter coeffi- cients and sparsity regularization. IEEE TGRS, 53(4):1728– 1736, 2015. 2

    2015

  20. [28]

    Enhanced 3dtv regularization and its ap- plications on HSI denoising and compressed sensing

    Jiangjun Peng, Qi Xie, Qian Zhao, Yao Wang, Yee Leung, and Deyu Meng. Enhanced 3dtv regularization and its ap- plications on HSI denoising and compressed sensing. IEEE TIP, 29:7889–7903, 2020. 2

    2020

  21. [29]

    Low-rank and sparse 9 representation for hyperspectral image processing: A review

    Jiangtao Peng, Weiwei Sun, Heng-Chao Li, Wei Li, Xi- angchao Meng, Chiru Ge, and Qian Du. Low-rank and sparse 9 representation for hyperspectral image processing: A review. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine , 10(1):10– 43, 2022. 1

    2022

  22. [30]

    Exact decomposition of joint low rankness and local smoothness plus sparse matrices

    Jiangjun Peng, Yao Wang, Hong-Ying Zhang, Jianjun Wang, and Deyu Meng. Exact decomposition of joint low rankness and local smoothness plus sparse matrices. IEEE TPAMI, 45 (5):5766–5781, 2023. 2

    2023

  23. [31]

    MSSL: hyperspectral and panchro- matic images fusion via multiresolution spatial-spectral fea- ture learning networks

    Jiahui Qu, Yanzi Shi, Weiying Xie, Yunsong Li, Xianyun Wu, and Qian Du. MSSL: hyperspectral and panchro- matic images fusion via multiresolution spatial-spectral fea- ture learning networks. IEEE TGRS, 60:5504113, 2022. 2

    2022

  24. [32]

    Unsupervised hyperspectral pansharpening via low-rank diffusion model

    Xiangyu Rui, Xiangyong Cao, Li Pang, Zeyu Zhu, Zong- sheng Yue, and Deyu Meng. Unsupervised hyperspectral pansharpening via low-rank diffusion model. Inf. Fusion , 107:102325, 2024. 2, 7

    2024

  25. [33]

    MFT-GAN: A multiscale feature-guided transformer net- work for unsupervised hyperspectral pansharpening

    Yanli Shang, Jianjun Liu, Jingyi Zhang, and Zebin Wu. MFT-GAN: A multiscale feature-guided transformer net- work for unsupervised hyperspectral pansharpening. IEEE TRGS, 62:5518516, 2024. 1

    2024

  26. [34]

    Hyperfusion: A computational approach for hy- perspectral, multispectral, and panchromatic image fusion

    Xin Tian, Wei Zhang, Yuerong Chen, Zhongyuan Wang, and Jiayi Ma. Hyperfusion: A computational approach for hy- perspectral, multispectral, and panchromatic image fusion. IEEE TGRS, 60:1–16, 2022. 2

    2022

  27. [35]

    Guaranteed tensor recovery fused low-rankness and smoothness

    Hailin Wang, Jiangjun Peng, Wenjin Qin, Jianjun Wang, and Deyu Meng. Guaranteed tensor recovery fused low-rankness and smoothness. IEEE TPAMI, 45(9):10990–11007, 2023. 2

    2023

  28. [36]

    A general paradigm with detail-preserving conditional in- vertible network for image fusion

    Wu Wang, Liang-Jian Deng, Ran Ran, and Gemine Vivone. A general paradigm with detail-preserving conditional in- vertible network for image fusion. IJCV, 132(4):1029–1054,

  29. [37]

    Hyperspectral im- age super-resolution via recurrent feedback embedding and spatial-spectral consistency regularization

    Xinya Wang, Jiayi Ma, and Junjun Jiang. Hyperspectral im- age super-resolution via recurrent feedback embedding and spatial-spectral consistency regularization. IEEE TGRS, 60: 1–13, 2022. 2

    2022

  30. [38]

    Hyperspectral image restoration via total variation regularized low-rank tensor decomposition

    Yao Wang, Jiangjun Peng, Qian Zhao, Yee Leung, Xi-Le Zhao, and Deyu Meng. Hyperspectral image restoration via total variation regularized low-rank tensor decomposition. IEEE JSTARS, 11(4):1227–1243, 2018. 2

    2018

  31. [39]

    Enhancing hyperspectral images via dif- fusion model and group-autoencoder super-resolution net- work

    Zhaoyang Wang, Dongyang Li, Mingyang Zhang, Hao Luo, and Maoguo Gong. Enhancing hyperspectral images via dif- fusion model and group-autoencoder super-resolution net- work. In AAAI, pages 5794–5804, 2024. 2

    2024

  32. [40]

    3-d quasi-recurrent neural network for hyperspectral image denoising

    Kaixuan Wei, Ying Fu, and Hua Huang. 3-d quasi-recurrent neural network for hyperspectral image denoising. IEEE TNNLS, 32(1):363–375, 2021. 2

    2021

  33. [41]

    Hsr-diff: Hyperspectral image super- resolution via conditional diffusion models

    Chanyue Wu, Dong Wang, Yunpeng Bai, Hanyu Mao, Ying Li, and Qiang Shen. Hsr-diff: Hyperspectral image super- resolution via conditional diffusion models. In ICCV, pages 7060–7070, 2023. 2

    2023

  34. [42]

    Ediffsr: An efficient diffusion prob- abilistic model for remote sensing image super-resolution

    Yi Xiao, Qiangqiang Yuan, Kui Jiang, Jiang He, Xianyu Jin, and Liangpei Zhang. Ediffsr: An efficient diffusion prob- abilistic model for remote sensing image super-resolution. IEEE TGRS, 62:5601514, 2024. 2

    2024

  35. [43]

    Multitask sparse representation model-inspired network for hyperspectral image denoising

    Fengchao Xiong, Jiantao Zhou, Jun Zhou, Jianfeng Lu, and Yuntao Qian. Multitask sparse representation model-inspired network for hyperspectral image denoising. IEEE TGRS, 61: 5518515, 2023. 2

    2023

  36. [44]

    Deep gradient projection networks for pan-sharpening

    Shuang Xu, Jiangshe Zhang, Zixiang Zhao, Kai Sun, Junmin Liu, and Chunxia Zhang. Deep gradient projection networks for pan-sharpening. In CVPR, pages 1366–1375, 2021. 6

    2021

  37. [45]

    Pan-denoising: Guided hyperspectral image denoising via weighted represent coefficient total variation

    Shuang Xu, Qiao Ke, Jiangjun Peng, Xiangyong Cao, and Zixiang Zhao. Pan-denoising: Guided hyperspectral image denoising via weighted represent coefficient total variation. IEEE TGRS, 62:5528714, 2024. 3, 7

    2024

  38. [46]

    Overview frequency principle/spectral bias in deep learning

    Zhi-Qin John Xu, Yaoyu Zhang, and Tao Luo. Overview frequency principle/spectral bias in deep learning. arXiv, 2201.07395, 2022. 3

    2022 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Hyperspectral image denoising employ- ing a spatial-spectral deep residual convolutional neural net- work

    Qiangqiang Yuan, Qiang Zhang, Jie Li, Huanfeng Shen, and Liangpei Zhang. Hyperspectral image denoising employ- ing a spatial-spectral deep residual convolutional neural net- work. IEEE TGRS, 57(2):1205–1218, 2019. 2

    2019

  40. [48]

    Unmixing diffusion for self-supervised hyperspectral image denoising

    Haijin Zeng, Jiezhang Cao, Kai Zhang, Yongyong Chen, Hiep Luong, and Wilfried Philips. Unmixing diffusion for self-supervised hyperspectral image denoising. In CVPR, pages 27820–27830, 2024. 2

    2024

  41. [49]

    Hyperspectral image restoration using low-rank matrix recovery

    Hongyan Zhang, Wei He, Liangpei Zhang, Huanfeng Shen, and Qiangqiang Yuan. Hyperspectral image restoration using low-rank matrix recovery. IEEE TGRS , 52(8):4729–4743,

  42. [50]

    Three- dimension spatial-spectral attention transformer for hyper- spectral image denoising

    Qiang Zhang, Yushuai Dong, Yaming Zheng, Haoyang Yu, Meiping Song, Lifu Zhang, and Qiangqiang Yuan. Three- dimension spatial-spectral attention transformer for hyper- spectral image denoising. IEEE TGRS , 62:5531213, 2024. 1

    2024

  43. [51]

    Hyperspectral image de- noising: From model-driven, data-driven, to model-data- driven

    Qiang Zhang, Yaming Zheng, Qiangqiang Yuan, Meiping Song, Haoyang Yu, and Yi Xiao. Hyperspectral image de- noising: From model-driven, data-driven, to model-data- driven. IEEE TNNLS, 35(10):13143–13163, 2024. 1 10

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.