Squashed 7-spheres, octonions and the swampland

Bengt E.W. Nilsson

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 29 references

Squashed 7-spheres, octonions and the swampland

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper reports the complete eigenvalue spectrum of the operators entering the Freund–Rubin compactification of eleven-dimensional supergravity on the squashed seven-sphere, tying each eigenvalue to an isometry irrep and determining…

desk verdict An honest, clearly written proceedings review of the author's own spectrum results; useful as an entry point, but it contains no new derivations and the singleton Higgsing idea is just a suggestion. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.04208 v1 pith:7IHXMTSP submitted 2024-12-05 hep-th

Bengt E.W. Nilsson This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-th

keywords squashed7-sphereKaluza–Kleinspectrum11-dimensionalsupergravityG2holonomyoctonionsAdS4/CFT3singletonswampland

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports that the entire eigenvalue spectrum of the operators arising in the Freund–Rubin compactification of eleven-dimensional supergravity on the squashed seven-sphere has been derived, completing a programme that started with the isometry-irrep spectrum. The spectrum fixes the masses of fields in AdS4, which in turn determines the N=1 supermultiplet structure of the left-squashed vacuum and, after an orientation flip, the spectrum of the non-supersymmetric right-squashed vacuum. A key finding is that boundary conditions can be chosen so the right-squashed vacuum has no marginal operators on the AdS4 boundary, which is of interest for the swampland conjecture that non-supersymmetric AdS vacua are unstable. The derivation relies on the octonionic structure of the squashed sphere and a universal Laplacian formula that unifies all the relevant operators.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is a universal Laplacian $$\$\Delta$ = C_g + \frac{6}{7}C_{SO(7)} - \frac{3}{2}C_{G_2} - \frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}a_{abc}\$Sigma^{{ab}}$\tilde{D}^c,$$ which unifies the scalar, form, and Lichnerowicz operators on the squashed $S^7$, together with a set of seven 2-form mode functions $Y^{(1)}$ through $Y^{(7)}$ built from octonionic structure constants, Killing vectors, and $G_2$-covariant derivatives. Acting with the universal Laplacian on these mode functions ties eigenvalues to the crosses in the isometry-irrep cross diagrams, and this eigenvalue-to-irrep dictionary is what converts operator spectra into AdS4 mass spectra and supermultiplets.

What would settle it

Compute the spectrum of the 2-form Laplacian on the squashed S7 by an independent method (for example, direct numerical integration of the eigenvalue equation in the coset metric) and compare with the fifteen transverse cross diagrams: any eigenvalue not appearing in the diagrams, or any irrep with the wrong eigenvalue, would falsify the universal Laplacian formula and the mode-function basis.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that every operator eigenvalue on the squashed S7 appearing in the mass matrices of D=11 supergravity has been computed and matched to a specific isometry irrep, giving the complete Kaluza–Klein spectra for both the left-squashed N=1 vacuum and its orientation-flipped right-squashed non-supersymmetric counterpart. This completes the assignment of AdS4 mass values to SO(2,3) irreps D(E0,s). For the supersymmetric vacuum the spectrum is completely understood except for a degeneracy in supermultiplets containing Lichnerowicz-operator masses; for the non-supersymmetric vacuum the paper concludes that boundary conditions can be selected so that no marginal operators exist on the boundary. A surprising structural result is that supersymmetry does not fix the boundary conditions of scalar and spin-1/2 fields: the E0 values fit into Wess–Zumino supermultiplets in two different ways depending on the choice of boundary conditions.

Load-bearing premise

The entire eigenvalue-to-irrep assignment rests on the universal Laplacian formula (5.1) and the claim that the seven 2-form mode functions generate all 2-form modes; if the G2-covariant derivative identity or the completeness of these mode functions fails, the spectrum tables and supermultiplets built on them would not hold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the spectra are correct, the AdS4 mass spectrum of the left-squashed vacuum is fully fixed, so every N=1 supermultiplet at a given isometry irrep has a definite E0, allowing direct checks of holographic predictions.
The right-squashed vacuum can be made free of marginal boundary operators by a boundary-condition choice, which would remove one possible instability channel and sharpen the AdS stability conjecture.
The degeneracy $\Delta_2^{(3)}=\Delta_2^{(3)\prime}$ in the 2-form sector implies two distinct eigenfunctions share an eigenvalue, and any computation that resolves this degeneracy would test the completeness of the mode basis.
The singleton-to-bulk Higgs effect proposed here predicts specific spin-3/2 states at $E_0=5/2$ in the squashed vacuum, and finding them would connect round and squashed spectra through a dynamical mechanism.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The boundary-condition freedom found for the left-squashed vacuum may also resolve apparent ambiguities in other Kaluza–Klein spectra where the same mass operator admits two E0 branches.
If the no-marginal-operator choice is correct, the right-squashed vacuum becomes a sharper test case for the AdS stability conjecture: stability then hinges on non-marginal operators or on effects beyond the 1/N expansion.
The two-derivative mode function $Y^{(6)}$ suggests that higher-derivative mode functions could be needed for other exceptional-holonomy compactifications, not just $S^7$.
The claimed singleton Higgs effect, if given a Lagrangian realisation, would be a new mechanism by which boundary degrees of freedom become bulk fields under squashing.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

This is an extended proceedings article, not a new research paper. It reviews Nilsson's own series [1-4] on the Kaluza-Klein spectra of squashed S7 in 11d supergravity, with an eye on the Ooguri-Vafa AdS stability conjecture. The one genuinely new item is the suggested 'singleton Higgsing' effect, and the author is upfront that no Lagrangian realization exists. So treat it as a review.

What it does well: the strategy section is clear, the cross-diagram and supermultiplet tables give an organized map of who sits where, and the summary of how boundary conditions can remove marginal operators in the right-squashed case is a useful condensation of [3,4] for someone who doesn't want to dig through the long papers. The paper is honest about its reliance on the MSc thesis [5] and work in progress [28]. It also explicitly admits the unresolved degeneracy in Lichnerowicz-related supermultiplets, so it doesn't oversell completeness.

Soft spots: the load-bearing pieces — universal Laplacian (5.1) and the 2-form mode functions (5.2)-(5.3) — are asserted without derivation. The stress-test concern is legitimate: if those mode functions don't span the full 2-form space or if (5.1) has a sign error, the eigenvalue-to-irrep assignments and everything built on them would fail. But this is a review; the paper does not claim to prove those formulas here, just to report them. The real weakness is that the sources are not all publicly refereed — an MSc thesis and a 'work in progress' carry the completeness claim. An independent reader can't verify. Also, the singleton Higgsing idea is a pointer, not a calculation, and the text says so.

Who should read it: someone who wants the state of play on squashed S7 spectra without redoing the series, or someone checking whether the marginal-operator claim is as strong as it sounds. They'll need the references to check weight-bearing statements.

Verdict: accept as a review provided the referees are asked to compare the summary against [4] and [5]. It's not a primary research paper, and shouldn't be judged as one.

Recommendation: worth sending to a referee if submitted to a journal; the claims are significant and the summary should be checked for fidelity.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper is an extended proceedings contribution that reviews the author's recent series of papers on Kaluza-Klein spectra of eleven-dimensional supergravity compactified on the squashed seven-sphere. It presents the operator spectrum, with details for 2-forms, using a universal Laplacian formula (5.1) and explicit mode functions (5.2)-(5.3), and connects the eigenvalues to SO(2,3) representations and to N=1 supermultiplets in Tables 3 and 4. By skew-whiffing, the paper also discusses the non-supersymmetric right-squashed vacuum and claims that boundary conditions can be chosen so that no marginal operators remain on the AdS4 boundary, which is relevant to the AdS stability conjecture in the swampland program. The paper also discusses singletons and proposes a possible Higgsing mechanism by which singletons acquire bulk states.

Significance. If the spectral results are correct, they provide a fairly complete Kaluza-Klein spectrum for an N=1 supersymmetric AdS4 compactification and concrete input for the stability discussion of a non-supersymmetric AdS vacuum. The paper is transparent about its limitations: it explicitly flags the degeneracy associated with Lichnerowicz-related operators, the absence of a Lagrangian realization of the singleton-Higgsing suggestion, and the reliance on the author's previous papers for the key formulas. Those honest caveats are a strength, as are the clear cross-diagram summaries and the supermultiplet tables. The main weakness is that the load-bearing formulas are not derived or independently checked in this manuscript, and one advertised swampland conclusion is not documented in enough detail to be verified by the reader.

major comments (3)

[§5, Eq. (5.1)-(5.3)] The entire spectral assignment rests on the universal Laplacian (5.1) and on the seven mode-function families (5.2)-(5.3), yet neither is derived in this manuscript. The paper states that (5.1) was found in [5] and used heavily in [4], and that the double-derivative mode function Y^(6) will be further explained in [28], which is work in progress. No counting argument shows that the Y^(i) span all 21 (or 15 transverse) 2-form modes, and no independent consistency check is provided, for instance against the round-S7 limit or against the independent calculation in [27]. Since the eigenvalue-to-cross assignments in Figure 3 and the supermultiplet tables depend on these formulas, the claim in Conclusion 2 that the left-squashed spectrum is "completely understood apart from the degeneracy" is not verifiable from this paper. Please include the derivation or a verification of (5.1) and of the completeness of the mode functions, or explicitly restrict the paper to a review whose proof is delegated to [4].
[§6, Conclusion 5] Conclusion 5 states that boundary conditions can be chosen so that the right-squashed vacuum has no marginal operators on the boundary, citing [3,4]. The manuscript does not, however, define those boundary conditions or list the operators that become marginal under other choices. Because this is the swampland-relevant conclusion and one of the paper's advertised results, the reader needs at least the operator list and the explicit boundary-condition assignment, or a clear statement that the result is taken verbatim from [3,4] without further analysis here.
[§5, Tables 3-4 and Conclusion 2] The admitted Lichnerowicz degeneracy is not a peripheral footnote: the text says it occurs in all supermultiplets containing fields whose masses are related to the Lichnerowicz operators on S7, and the degenerate cases are deferred to [28], which is work in progress. Since Conclusion 2 uses "completely understood apart from the degeneracy" as its main completeness statement, the paper should state precisely which entries of Tables 3 and 4 are established and which depend on the unresolved degeneracy or on [28]. Without this separation, the completeness claim is weaker than the text suggests.

minor comments (6)

[§5, before Eq. (5.1)] The word "dserivative" appears where "derivative" is intended.
[§5, after Eq. (5.3)] The word "degenaracy" is a typo for "degeneracy".
[§5, degeneracy discussion] The phrase "in Table 5 above" appears to refer to Figure 3 or Table 3; there is no Table 5 in the manuscript.
[§5 and Figure 2] The Casimir notation is inconsistent: the text uses C_G while Figure 2 uses C_g; please define the normalization of the Casimir and use one symbol.
[§5, Eqs. (5.2)-(5.3)] Please define all symbols in the mode functions, including the SpC1 Killing vectors s^i_a, the epsilon tensor ǫ_ijk, the octonionic structure constants a_abc, and the notation {i|...|j}.
[§2, singleton Higgsing] The singleton-to-bulk Higgs effect is presented as a suggestion with no Lagrangian realization; this is stated honestly in the text, but it should be clearly labeled as a conjecture rather than as a consequence of the spectral analysis.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Central spectrum claim rests on self-cited and unpublished mode-function completeness; no construction-level circularity, but load-bearing self-citation.

self citation load bearing [Section 5, Eqs. (5.1)–(5.3) and surrounding text]
"Using these properties a universal Laplacian ∆ = −□ − R_abcdΣ^abΣ^cd (unifying ∆_p and ∆_L) was found in [5] and used heavily in [4]. It leads to the following group theoretic version of the operator equation on the squashed S7 valid for any of the relevant tangent space tensors [5]: ∆ = C_g + 6/7 C_SO(7) − 3/2 C_G2 − 1/√5 a_abcΣ^ab ˇD_c, (5.1) ... The operators below acting on scalar modes give all 21 2-form modes. ... The novel aspect of these mode functions is present in Y^(6)i_ab: It contains a two derivative operator ˇD_ab = ˇD_(a ˇD_b)."

The paper's headline claims—'The entire eigenvalue spectrum ... recently derived' and 'The left-squashed spectrum ... is completely understood apart from the degeneracy'—depend on (5.1) and on the assertion that the seven Y-operators in (5.2)–(5.3) span all 21 2-form modes. Neither is derived in this manuscript: (5.1) is attributed to [5], the Y^(i) to [4], and the crucial double-derivative mode function Y^(6) is deferred to [28], 'work in progress' by the same authors. The eigenvalue-to-isometry-irrep dictionary and the no-marginal-operator conclusion therefore reduce to an unverified self-citation chain rather than to an argument exhibited here. The external check [27] covers only 'parts of the squashed spectrum', so it does not substitute for the missing completeness proof.

full rationale

This is a review/proceedings account of the author's own series [1–4], so the derivations are largely referenced rather than reproduced. No parameter fitting or construction-level equation identity is present: the mass-operator relations, E0 formulas, and supermultiplet bookkeeping are standard or taken from earlier literature, and the paper cites an independent calculation [27] that agrees on parts of the spectrum. However, the central 'complete spectrum' claim is load-bearing on the universal Laplacian (5.1) and on the completeness of the seven 2-form mode functions (5.2)–(5.3), both of which are attributed to the same authors, including an MSc thesis [5] and a 'work in progress' [28]. The manuscript explicitly says the key Y^(6) mode function 'will be further explained in [28]', so the reader cannot verify the completeness of the basis from this paper alone. This is a moderate self-citation burden rather than a full reduction of the conclusion to its input, hence score 4.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted numbers; the squashing parameter and mass parameter are inputs from the geometry and background. The main intellectual debt is to the octonionic structure constant identity and the universal Laplacian of [5,4], which are assumed rather than derived here. The only invented concept is the proposed singleton Higgsing effect, which is flagged by the author as lacking a Lagrangian realization.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The Freund-Rubin ansatz (1.2) with Fμνρσ = 3m εμνρσ yields the AdS4 × S7 background and the mass operator relations.
Used in Section 3 to connect S7 operator eigenvalues to AdS4 masses; standard in Kaluza-Klein supergravity.
domain assumption The squashed S7 is a reductive coset (Sp2 × SpC1)/(SpA1 × SpB+C1) with structure constants fabc = -(1/√5)aabc, where aabc are octonionic structure constants.
Invoked in Section 4 and Eq. (5.1); cited to [25] and not derived in this manuscript.
ad hoc to paper The universal Laplacian ∆ = C_g + (6/7)C_SO(7) - (3/2)C_G2 - (1/√5)aabc Σab ˇDc is valid for all relevant tangent space tensors.
Stated in Eq. (5.1) and attributed to [5]; the manuscript does not reproduce the derivation.
standard math The mass/energy relations in Tables 1-2 and the SO(2,3) irrep data, including D(E0,s) and unitarity bounds, are correct.
Used throughout to convert operator eigenvalues into E0 values; standard results from [8,17].
domain assumption The seven 2-form mode functions Y^(1)...Y^(7) in Eqs. (5.2)-(5.3) span all 21 2-form modes on the squashed S7.
This spanning property is stated in Section 5 and attributed to [4]; no proof is given in this manuscript.

invented entities (1)

Singleton-to-bulk Higgs effect (singleton acquiring bulk states)
purpose: To reconcile round and squashed S7 spectra by turning boundary-localized singleton modes into bulk fields.
Proposed in Section 2 and Conclusion 1; the author explicitly states that no Lagrangian realization exists, so this is a speculative entity without an external falsifiable handle.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Squashed 7-spheres, octonions and the swampland." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7IHXMTSP

@misc{pith2026241204208,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Squashed 7-spheres, octonions and the swampland},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7IHXMTSP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.04208}
}

abstract

The entire eigenvalue spectrum of the operators on the squashed $S^7$ that appear in the Freund-Rubin compactification of eleven-dimensional supergravity was recently derived in [1 - 4]. Here we give a brief account of this work which started with [1] where the complete spectrum of irreducible isometry representations of the fields in $AdS_4$ was derived for the squashed $S^7$ compactification. The operator spectra determine the mass spectrum of the fields in $AdS_4$ and are important for the corresponding $\mathcal{N} =1$ supermultiplet structure which appears in two versions depending on the choice of boundary conditions. By an orientation-flip on the squashed $S^7$ we can also determine the spectrum of the corresponding non-supersymmetric theory, and, e.g., its spectrum of marginal operators on the boundary of $AdS_4$ which may have some relevance for the $AdS$ stability conjecture in the swampland program. The role of singletons is discussed and a possible new Higgsing phenomenon turning them into bulk fields is suggested. Details are here given primarily for 2-forms and comments are made on the key role of $G_2$ and octonions for the structure of the operator equations and mode functions on the squashed $S^7$. Some important features of these improved methods were obtained in Joel Karlsson's 2021 MSc thesis [5]. This is an extended version of the author's contribution to the proceedings of the conference ISQS28, Prague, Czech Republic, July 1 - 5, 2024.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

[5]

Compactiﬁcations of String/M-Theory and the Sw ampland: A Study of the AdS4 Mass Spectrum of Eleven-Dimensional Supergravity on the Squash ed Seven-Sphere,

J. Karlsson, “Compactiﬁcations of String/M-Theory and the Sw ampland: A Study of the AdS4 Mass Spectrum of Eleven-Dimensional Supergravity on the Squash ed Seven-Sphere,” [arXiv:2110.09885 [hep-th]]. Chalmers Univ. of Tech., G¨ oteborg, MSc thesis (2020)

arXiv 2020
[28]

Karlsson and B

J. Karlsson and B. E. W. Nilsson, work in progress

work page
[4]

The complete Kaluza-Klein spect ra of N = 1 and N = 0 M-theory on AdS4 × squashed S7),

J. Karlsson and B. E. W. Nilsson, “The complete Kaluza-Klein spect ra of N = 1 and N = 0 M-theory on AdS4 × squashed S7),” JHEP 02 (2024), 144 [arXiv:2305.00916 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2024
[27]

Kaluza-Klein spectrom etry beyond consistent truncations: the squashed S 7,

B. Duboeuf, E. Malek and H. Samtleben, “Kaluza-Klein spectrom etry beyond consistent truncations: the squashed S 7,” JHEP 04 (2023), 062 [arXiv:2212.01135 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2023
[1]

The role of singleton s in S 7 compactiﬁcations,

B. E. W. Nilsson, A. Padellaro and C. N. Pope, “The role of singleton s in S 7 compactiﬁcations,” JHEP 07 (2019), 124 [arXiv:1811.06228 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2019
[2]

On the squashed seven-sphe re operator spectrum,

S. Ekhammar and B. E. W. Nilsson, “On the squashed seven-sphe re operator spectrum,” JHEP 12 (2021), 057 [arXiv:2105.05229 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2021
[3]

De-Higgsing in eleven-dimensional supergravity on the squashed S 7,

B. E. W. Nilsson and C. N. Pope, “De-Higgsing in eleven-dimensional supergravity on the squashed S 7,” J. Phys. A 57 (2024) no.4, 045402 [arXiv:2302.03842 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2024
[6]

N = 8 Supergravity Break s Down to N = 1,

M. A. Awada, M. J. Duﬀ and C. N. Pope, “N = 8 Supergravity Break s Down to N = 1,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 50 (1983), 294

work page 1983

Show all 29 references

[7]

Spontaneous Supers ymmetry Breaking by the Squashed Seven Sphere,

M. J. Duﬀ, B. E. W. Nilsson and C. N. Pope, “Spontaneous Supers ymmetry Breaking by the Squashed Seven Sphere,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 50 (1983) no.26, 2043

1983
[8]

Kaluza-Klein Supergra vity,

M. J. Duﬀ, B. E. W. Nilsson and C. N. Pope, “Kaluza-Klein Supergra vity,” Phys. Rept. 130 (1986) 1

1986
[9]

The String landscape and the swampland,

C. Vafa, “The String landscape and the swampland,” hep-th/050 9212
[10]

Non-supersymmetric AdS and the Swa mpland,

H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, “Non-supersymmetric AdS and the Swa mpland,” [arXiv:1610.01533 [hep-th]]

arXiv
[11]

Stability in Gauged Exten ded Supergravity,

P. Breitenlohner and D. Z. Freedman, “Stability in Gauged Exten ded Supergravity,” Annals Phys. 144 (1982), 249

1982
[12]

Holographic evidence for nonsupersymmetric conformal manifold s,

A. Giambrone, A. Guarino, E. Malek, H. Samtleben, C. Sterckx a nd M. Trigiante, “Holographic evidence for nonsupersymmetric conformal manifold s,” Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) no.6, 066018 [arXiv:2112.11966 [hep-th]]

2022 arXiv
[13]

On the stability of string t heory vacua,

S. Giri, L. Martucci and A. Tomasiello, “On the stability of string t heory vacua,” JHEP 04 (2022), 054 [arXiv:2112.10795 [hep-th]]. – 11 –

2022 arXiv
[14]

The Criterion for Vac uum Stability in Kaluza-Klein Supergravity,

M. J. Duﬀ, B. E. W. Nilsson and C. N. Pope, “The Criterion for Vac uum Stability in Kaluza-Klein Supergravity,” Phys. Lett. 139B (1984) 154

1984
[15]

Three-dimensional CFTs and RG ﬂow fr om squashing M2-brane horizon,

C. h. Ahn and S. J. Rey, “Three-dimensional CFTs and RG ﬂow fr om squashing M2-brane horizon,” Nucl. Phys. B 565 (2000), 210, [arXiv:hep-th/9908110 [hep-th]]

2000 arXiv
[16]

Renormalization group ﬂows in gauge-gravity dua lity,

A. Murugan, “Renormalization group ﬂows in gauge-gravity dua lity,” Princeton University PhD thesis (2009), [arXiv:1610.03166 [hep-th]]

2009 arXiv
[17]

REPRESENTATIONS OF SUPERSYMMETRY IN ANTI-DE S ITTER SPACE,

H. Nicolai, “REPRESENTATIONS OF SUPERSYMMETRY IN ANTI-DE S ITTER SPACE,” CERN-TH-3882, April 1984

1984
[18]

A Remarkable representation of the 3 + 2 de Sitt er group,

P. A. M. Dirac, “A Remarkable representation of the 3 + 2 de Sitt er group,” J. Math. Phys. 4 (1963), 901-909

1963
[19]

The Mass Spe ctrum of Supergravity on the Round Seven Sphere,

A. Casher, F. Englert, H. Nicolai and M. Rooman, “The Mass Spe ctrum of Supergravity on the Round Seven Sphere,” Nucl. Phys. B 243 (1984), 173

1984
[20]

11D supergravity on AdS4 × S7 versus AdS7 × S4,

E. Sezgin, “11D supergravity on AdS4 × S7 versus AdS7 × S4,” J. Phys. A 53 (2020) no.36, 364003 [arXiv:2003.01135 [hep-th]]

2020 arXiv
[21]

Singleton Representations of Osp( N ,4),

H. Nicolai and E. Sezgin, “Singleton Representations of Osp( N ,4),” Phys. Lett. B 143 (1984), 389-395

1984
[22]

Singletons in supersymmetric ﬁeld t heories and in supergravity,

H. Samtleben and E. Sezgin, “Singletons in supersymmetric ﬁeld t heories and in supergravity,” [arXiv:2409.03000 [hep-th]]

arXiv
[23]

The Spectrum of the Eleven-dimensional Supergra vity Compactiﬁed on the Round Seven Sphere,

E. Sezgin, “The Spectrum of the Eleven-dimensional Supergra vity Compactiﬁed on the Round Seven Sphere,” Phys. Lett. B 138 (1984), 57-62

1984
[24]

Scalar and Dirac Eigenfunctions on the Squashed Seven Sphere,

B. E. W. Nilsson and C. N. Pope, “Scalar and Dirac Eigenfunctions on the Squashed Seven Sphere,” Phys. Lett. 133B (1983) 67

1983
[25]

Geometry of Co set Spaces and Massless Modes of the Squashed Seven Sphere in Supergravity,

F. A. Bais, H. Nicolai and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, “Geometry of Co set Spaces and Massless Modes of the Squashed Seven Sphere in Supergravity,” Nucl. Phys. B 228 (1983), 333-350

1983
[26]

ALL LINEAR UNITARY IRREDUCIBLE REPRESEN TATIONS OF DE SITTER SUPERSYMMETRY WITH POSITIVE ENERGY,

W. Heidenreich, “ALL LINEAR UNITARY IRREDUCIBLE REPRESEN TATIONS OF DE SITTER SUPERSYMMETRY WITH POSITIVE ENERGY,” Phys. Lett. B 110 (1982), 461-464

1982
[29]

The Singleton Dipole,

M. Flato and C. Fronsdal, “The Singleton Dipole,” Commun. Math. P hys. 108 (1987), 469 – 12 –

1987

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [5]

Compactiﬁcations of String/M-Theory and the Sw ampland: A Study of the AdS4 Mass Spectrum of Eleven-Dimensional Supergravity on the Squash ed Seven-Sphere,

J. Karlsson, “Compactiﬁcations of String/M-Theory and the Sw ampland: A Study of the AdS4 Mass Spectrum of Eleven-Dimensional Supergravity on the Squash ed Seven-Sphere,” [arXiv:2110.09885 [hep-th]]. Chalmers Univ. of Tech., G¨ oteborg, MSc thesis (2020)

arXiv 2020

[2] [28]

Karlsson and B

J. Karlsson and B. E. W. Nilsson, work in progress

work page

[3] [4]

The complete Kaluza-Klein spect ra of N = 1 and N = 0 M-theory on AdS4 × squashed S7),

J. Karlsson and B. E. W. Nilsson, “The complete Kaluza-Klein spect ra of N = 1 and N = 0 M-theory on AdS4 × squashed S7),” JHEP 02 (2024), 144 [arXiv:2305.00916 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2024

[4] [27]

Kaluza-Klein spectrom etry beyond consistent truncations: the squashed S 7,

B. Duboeuf, E. Malek and H. Samtleben, “Kaluza-Klein spectrom etry beyond consistent truncations: the squashed S 7,” JHEP 04 (2023), 062 [arXiv:2212.01135 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2023

[5] [1]

The role of singleton s in S 7 compactiﬁcations,

B. E. W. Nilsson, A. Padellaro and C. N. Pope, “The role of singleton s in S 7 compactiﬁcations,” JHEP 07 (2019), 124 [arXiv:1811.06228 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2019

[6] [2]

On the squashed seven-sphe re operator spectrum,

S. Ekhammar and B. E. W. Nilsson, “On the squashed seven-sphe re operator spectrum,” JHEP 12 (2021), 057 [arXiv:2105.05229 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2021

[7] [3]

De-Higgsing in eleven-dimensional supergravity on the squashed S 7,

B. E. W. Nilsson and C. N. Pope, “De-Higgsing in eleven-dimensional supergravity on the squashed S 7,” J. Phys. A 57 (2024) no.4, 045402 [arXiv:2302.03842 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2024

[8] [6]

N = 8 Supergravity Break s Down to N = 1,

M. A. Awada, M. J. Duﬀ and C. N. Pope, “N = 8 Supergravity Break s Down to N = 1,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 50 (1983), 294

work page 1983