Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 29 references

SynFinTabs: A Dataset of Synthetic Financial Tables for Information and Table Extraction

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper introduces SynFinTabs, a 100,000-table synthetic financial dataset with exact word-, cell-, and row-level bounding boxes, and argues that it can train a layout language model to answer questions about real financial table images.

desk verdict A genuinely useful synthetic dataset with word-level annotations, but the transfer-to-real-world claim rests on a 100-question evaluation with a first-occurrence span rule that can mislabel answers. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.04262 v1 pith:7HLNSMSK submitted 2024-12-05 cs.LG

Ethan Bradley , Muhammad Roman , Karen Rafferty , Barry Devereux This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.LG
keywords syntheticdatafinancialtablestableextractiondocumentunderstandinglayoutlanguagemodelsvisualquestionansweringOCRboundingboxannotations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

SynFinTabs is a proposed solution to the scarcity of accurately labelled financial table images: 100,000 synthetic tables, each rendered from a structured specification so that the true bounding boxes of every word, cell, and row are known without OCR. The paper argues that this synthetic ground truth is sufficient to train a layout language model, FinTabQA, to answer extractive questions about table contents, and that the model transfers to real-world financial statements. On a hand-built test set of 100 questions about real tables from UK company filings, FinTabQA scores 89% exact match with table-cropped images, compared with 76% for GPT-4V given the questions alone and 94% for GPT-4V with an added extraction instruction. The authors also report near-perfect accuracy (99.98%) when ground-truth words are supplied instead of OCR output, which they use to attribute most end-to-end errors to OCR rather than to the model. The broader claim is that the generation method, not just the dataset, can be transferred to other document domains.

What carries the argument

The mechanism that carries the argument is the table-generation and annotation pipeline. Each table begins as a structured object (sections, rows, cells, words), is serialised to HTML with a unique ID on every row, cell, and word, and is rendered in a headless browser at A4 page size; the browser's layout engine provides the pixel coordinates for every element, giving exact word-, cell-, and row-level bounding boxes as well as cell types ('section title', 'currency unit', 'row header', 'column header', 'data'). A question-answer pair is generated for every non-empty cell from its row and column headers, with the answer span located by start and end positions in the flattened word list. Fine-tuning LayoutLM on these pairs with exact span supervision, and evaluating with strict start/end exact match, is the demonstration task.

What would settle it

Train the same LayoutLM configuration on real labelled tables only, evaluate it on the authors' 100 real-world table questions, and compare with FinTabQA; if the real-data model matches or exceeds FinTabQA's 89%, the claim that synthetic tables are effective for training would be weakened.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that a large set of procedurally generated financial tables, labelled at word, cell, and row granularity at creation time, can stand in for real labelled financial tables in training an extractive table-QA model. The authors build SynFinTabs from six visual themes modelled on real filings and reports, randomise content and style, and render each table in a headless browser to record exact bounding boxes. Fine-tuning LayoutLM on this data yields FinTabQA, which reaches 89% exact match on 100 real-world questions from financial statements, outperforming GPT-4V (76%) in the question-only condition and approaching GPT-4V (94%) when the comparison model receives a task-specific instruction. The paper frames the result as evidence that the synthetic dataset is effective for information extraction from financial tables, and that the main bottleneck in the end-to-end pipeline is OCR quality, not the synthetic training data.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the CSS templates used to generate SynFinTabs resemble real financial tables closely enough that a model trained on synthetic tables transfers to real-world tables; the paper supports this by visual inspection of a sample, not by a quantitative transfer comparison.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A model trained on SynFinTabs can answer real-world table questions at 89% exact match, showing synthetic financial tables are a viable substitute for manually labelled ones.
  • The same pipeline can be reused to generate larger or more diverse datasets, since the generation code is released alongside the data.
  • Because the ground-truth bounding boxes do not depend on OCR, the dataset can serve as clean supervision for table structure recognition, cell classification, and OCR training on tabular text.
  • The paper's error analysis indicates that most remaining end-to-end errors come from OCR rather than from the synthetic training data, pointing to OCR improvement as the next bottleneck.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct quantitative test of the transfer assumption would be to train the same LayoutLM recipe on a real labelled table dataset and compare on the same real-world question set; the paper does not include this comparison.
  • The QA templates all share one grammatical form, so the dataset is likely to support models that answer template-style questions about tables; adapting the released code to generate more varied questions would test whether the learned skill generalises to free-form questions.
  • Because the synthetic content is random, models trained on it can learn layout, syntax, and span-selection behaviour but not domain semantics, suggesting the method transfers best to tasks where visual table structure carries the answer and less well to tasks requiring financial reasoning.
  • The public generation code could be adapted to produce full synthetic document pages with tables placed in known positions, enabling table detection experiments without manual annotation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces SynFinTabs, a dataset of 100,000 synthetic financial table images with word-, cell-, and row-level bounding boxes, cell types, and generated question-answer pairs. The authors fine-tune LayoutLM to create FinTabQA, an extractive question-answering model over table images, and evaluate it on a synthetic test split and on a manually created real-world set of 100 questions over 50 Companies House tables. They report 95.87% accuracy on the synthetic test split and 89% on the real-world set, compare against GPT-4V, and analyze the impact of OCR errors on end-to-end performance.

Significance. If validated, SynFinTabs would be a valuable resource: it is large-scale, has accurate positional annotations (including full cell boxes, rows, and empty cells), and the generation code is public. The idea of using synthetic financial tables to avoid OCR noise in training is worth pursuing. However, the empirical evidence for the central claim that the dataset transfers to real-world tables is weakened by the evaluation protocol (first-occurrence span matching, zero-fallback) and by the lack of a comparison against training on an existing real table dataset. The paper's strengths are the dataset generation process and the release of code/data; the main weakness is the insufficient validation of the transfer claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.2 / Table 2] The real-world evaluation protocol is not a clean measure of extractive QA. When OCR fails to recognize the answer, both ground-truth span positions are set to zero, so a model that also predicts (0,0) is counted as correct even though it extracted no answer; conversely, when the answer text appears in multiple cells, first-occurrence span matching can mark a correct extraction as wrong or an incorrect cell extraction as correct. The paper itself identifies this first-occurrence problem in §4.1 for other OCR-based datasets, so applying the same rule to the real-world test undermines the validity of the reported 89% accuracy as evidence of transfer. The authors should either manually annotate the answer spans for the real-world questions or evaluate with a measure that compares the predicted cell text against the intended cell.
  2. [§4.2 / Table 2] The central claim that SynFinTabs is effective for training information extraction models is not compared against a baseline trained on an existing real-world table dataset (e.g., FinTabNet or PubTables-1M) under the same finetuning and evaluation setup. Without such a comparison, the absolute 89% accuracy on a small, manually evaluated set (100 questions, 50 tables) is difficult to interpret, since the model's performance could reflect properties of LayoutLM or the QA formulation rather than the quality of SynFinTabs. A matched comparison (same model, same evaluation, different training data) is needed to substantiate the transfer claim.
  3. [§4.3] The EasyOCR parameters were selected to maximize accuracy on the SynFinTabs test split (Table 1) and then applied to the real-world tables. Tuning preprocessing parameters on the test split makes the reported 95.87% an optimistic estimate of model performance on synthetic data, and it is unclear whether these parameters generalize to the real-world domain. For rigor, the parameter search should be done on a validation split or the default-parameter accuracy (75.27%) should be reported as the primary test result.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§4.1] The description of the 'end position limited' heuristic is informal; please give the exact procedure, for example by masking end logits for positions before the predicted start.
  2. [§3.1] The Companies House style was based on visual inspection of a random sample of extracted tables; because the transfer claim depends on the similarity of the synthetic layout distribution to real tables, a quantitative comparison (e.g., distributions of cell widths, text lengths, number of rows/columns) would be helpful.
  3. [Appendix A] Figure 5's example question contains a nonsensical row header ('Idle ver learning satisfied') due to random word generation; this is acknowledged in Limitations, but an example with a more realistic header would clarify the intended task.
  4. [Throughout] The paper uses 'layout LLM' for LayoutLM, which is a layout-aware language model but not a large language model; please use consistent terminology.
  5. [Table 2] Given the small number of questions, it would be useful to report confidence intervals or per-table performance alongside the aggregate accuracy.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the synthetic training set and the independent real-world evaluation support the main claim, and the noted limitations are evaluation-protocol issues rather than circular reductions.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are that SynFinTabs provides accurate synthetic training data and that FinTabQA transfers to real-world financial tables. Neither claim reduces to its own inputs. SynFinTabs generates word, cell, and row annotations directly from the table-generation process, so evaluating on the synthetic test split is an in-distribution measure of trainability, not a derivation of real-world transfer. The transfer claim rests on the independent real-world test set of 100 manually defined QA pairs over Companies House tables (Section 4.2), with no fitted parameter from that set entering the model. The closest concerns are evaluation-protocol weaknesses, not circularity: Section 4.3 reports that EasyOCR parameters were searched on the SynFinTabs test split and then reused on real-world tables, which is test-set tuning of a preprocessing step and can bias reported accuracy, but it does not force the real-world result by construction. Section 4.1 uses first-occurrence OCR spans and zero-fallback when the answer text is missing, and Section 4.3 acknowledges the zero-fallback cases; this can mislabel real-world answers, but it is an independent-label validity issue rather than a circular reduction. The Limitations section honestly notes random table contents, the single grammatical question form, and limited GPT-4V prompting, which bound generalization but do not make the derivation circular. There are no load-bearing self-citations: the cited works on LayoutLM, PubTables-1M, and Table Transformer provide external architecture and tooling, and the dataset generator code is released for independent inspection. No circular step is established.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that synthetic tables represent real-world financial tables closely enough, that the rendering process yields accurate ground truth, and that meaningful layout can be learned from random content. These are domain assumptions, not formal axioms, and the paper provides only qualitative support for them.

free parameters (1)
  • EasyOCR parameters = not reported
    A parameter search was performed on EasyOCR to maximize table extraction accuracy; the split used for the search is not stated, so these parameters could have been fitted to the test split, affecting the reported accuracies.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Synthetic tables generated with CSS templates capture the layout distribution of real-world financial statements
    Section 3.1: templates were based on observations from Companies House documents and spreadsheet images, but no quantitative validation of distributional match is provided.
  • domain assumption Bounding boxes extracted from the headless browser's DOM accurately reflect pixel positions in the rendered image
    Section 3.2: the generation process retrieves bounding boxes via element IDs in a headless browser; this assumes the rendering engine's layout coordinates match the screenshot pixels.
  • domain assumption A model can learn useful table structure from semantically random words and numbers
    Section 3.2 and Limitations: table content is randomly generated; the authors note that layout models cannot interpret meaning, but the QA task relies on structure and headers only.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of SynFinTabs: A Dataset of Synthetic Financial Tables for Information and Table Extraction." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7HLNSMSK

@misc{pith2026241204262,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: SynFinTabs: A Dataset of Synthetic Financial Tables for Information and Table Extraction},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7HLNSMSK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.04262}
}
read the original abstract

Table extraction from document images is a challenging AI problem, and labelled data for many content domains is difficult to come by. Existing table extraction datasets often focus on scientific tables due to the vast amount of academic articles that are readily available, along with their source code. However, there are significant layout and typographical differences between tables found across scientific, financial, and other domains. Current datasets often lack the words, and their positions, contained within the tables, instead relying on unreliable OCR to extract these features for training modern machine learning models on natural language processing tasks. Therefore, there is a need for a more general method of obtaining labelled data. We present SynFinTabs, a large-scale, labelled dataset of synthetic financial tables. Our hope is that our method of generating these synthetic tables is transferable to other domains. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our dataset in training models to extract information from table images, we create FinTabQA, a layout large language model trained on an extractive question-answering task. We test our model using real-world financial tables and compare it to a state-of-the-art generative model and discuss the results. We make the dataset, model, and dataset generation code publicly available.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.04262 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. SynFinTabs annotations compared with those [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Example tables from the six themes of SynFinTabs. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. A high-level overview of the SynFinTabs generation process. for training, validation, or testing, depending on the dataset split. In Appendix A, a dataset example can be seen along with its question-answer pair. The generation process is repeated until a dataset of the desired size has been created. A high-level overview of the generation process can be seen in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: A real-world financial table from a document [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A SynFinTabs example table with its prede [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Target span start and end positions against [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Target span start and end positions against [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    online" 'onlinestring :=

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter edition editor eid eprint eprinttype howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year doi pubmed url lastchecked label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block STRING...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in capitalize " " * FUNCT...

  3. [3]

    Zhiyu Chen, Wenhu Chen, Charese Smiley, Sameena Shah, Iana Borova, Dylan Langdon, Reema Moussa, Matt Beane, Ting-Hao Huang, Bryan Routledge, and William Yang Wang. 2021. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.300 F in QA : A dataset of numerical reasoning over financial data . In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Lang...

    doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.300 2021

  4. [4]

    Zhiyu Chen, Shiyang Li, Charese Smiley, Zhiqiang Ma, Sameena Shah, and William Yang Wang. 2022. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.421 C onv F in QA : Exploring the chain of numerical reasoning in conversational finance question answering . In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 6279--6292...

    doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.421 2022

  5. [5]

    Zewen Chi, Heyan Huang, Heng-Da Xu, Houjin Yu, Wanxuan Yin, and Xian-Ling Mao. 2019. https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.04729 Complicated table structure recognition . Preprint, arXiv:1908.04729

    arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    Lei Cui, Yiheng Xu, Tengchao Lv, and Furu Wei. 2021. https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.08609 Document AI : Benchmarks, models and applications . Preprint, arXiv:2111.08609

    arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N19-1423 BERT : Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding . In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North A merican Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long a...

    doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 2019

  8. [8]

    Julian Eisenschlos, Maharshi Gor, Thomas M \"u ller, and William Cohen. 2021. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.600 MATE : Multi-view attention for table transformer efficiency . In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 7606--7619, Online and Punta Cana, Dominican Republic. Association for ...

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.600 2021

Show all 29 references
  1. [9]

    Liangcai Gao, Yilun Huang, Herv \'e D \'e jean, Jean-Luc Meunier, Qinqin Yan, Yu Fang, Florian Kleber, and Eva Lang. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDAR.2019.00243 ICDAR 2019 competition on table detection and recognition ( cTDaR ) . In 2019 International Conference on Documen...

    2019

  2. [10]

    Max G \"o bel, Tamir Hassan, Ermelinda Oro, and Giorgio Orsi. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1145/2361354.2361365 A methodology for evaluating algorithms for table understanding in PDF documents . In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Symposium on Document Engineering, DocEng '12, pages 45...

    2012

  3. [11]

    Max G \"o bel, Tamir Hassan, Ermelinda Oro, and Giorgio Orsi. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDAR.2013.292 ICDAR 2013 table competition . In 2013 12th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, pages 1449--1453

    2013 doi

  4. [12]

    Jonathan Herzig, Pawel Krzysztof Nowak, Thomas M \"u ller, Francesco Piccinno, and Julian Eisenschlos. 2020. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.398 T a P as: Weakly supervised table parsing via pre-training . In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association ...

    2020 doi

  5. [13]

    Yupan Huang, Tengchao Lv, Lei Cui, Yutong Lu, and Furu Wei. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1145/3503161.3548112 LayoutLMv3 : Pre-training for document AI with unified text and image masking . In Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, MM '22, pages 4083--...

    2022

  6. [14]

    Minghao Li, Lei Cui, Shaohan Huang, Furu Wei, Ming Zhou, and Zhoujun Li. 2020 a . https://aclanthology.org/2020.lrec-1.236 T able B ank: Table benchmark for image-based table detection and recognition . In Proceedings of the Twelfth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference...

    2020

  7. [15]

    Minghao Li, Yiheng Xu, Lei Cui, Shaohan Huang, Furu Wei, Zhoujun Li, and Ming Zhou. 2020 b . https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.82 D oc B ank: A benchmark dataset for document layout analysis . In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Ling...

    2020 doi

  8. [16]

    OpenAI. 2023. https://cdn.openai.com/papers/GPTV_System_Card.pdf GPT -4 V (ision) system card

    2023

  9. [17]

    Panupong Pasupat and Percy Liang. 2015. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/P15-1142 Compositional semantic parsing on semi-structured tables . In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natur...

    2015 doi

  10. [18]

    PMC Open Access Subset. 2003. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/tools/openftlist/ PMC open access subset

    2003

  11. [19]

    Shah Rukh Qasim, Hassan Mahmood, and Faisal Shafait. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDAR.2019.00031 Rethinking table recognition using graph neural networks . In 2019 International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), pages 142--147

    2019

  12. [20]

    Pranav Rajpurkar, Robin Jia, and Percy Liang. 2018. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.03822 Know what you don't know: Unanswerable questions for SQ u AD . Preprint, arXiv:1806.03822

    2018 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Pranav Rajpurkar, Jian Zhang, Konstantin Lopyrev, and Percy Liang. 2016. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D16-1264 SQ u AD : 100,000+ questions for machine comprehension of text . In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 2383-...

    2016 doi

  14. [22]

    Brandon Smock, Rohith Pesala, and Robin Abraham. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.00459 Pub T ables-1 M : Towards comprehensive table extraction from unstructured documents . In 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 4624--4632

    2022

  15. [23]

    Thomas Wolf, Lysandre Debut, Victor Sanh, Julien Chaumond, Clement Delangue, Anthony Moi, Pierric Cistac, Tim Rault, Remi Louf, Morgan Funtowicz, Joe Davison, Sam Shleifer, Patrick von Platen, Clara Ma, Yacine Jernite, Julien Plu, Canwen Xu, Teven Le Scao, Sylvain Gugger, Mari...

    2020 doi

  16. [24]

    Yang Xu, Yiheng Xu, Tengchao Lv, Lei Cui, Furu Wei, Guoxin Wang, Yijuan Lu, Dinei Florencio, Cha Zhang, Wanxiang Che, Min Zhang, and Lidong Zhou. 2021. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.201 L ayout LM v2: Multi-modal pre-training for visually-rich document understandin...

    2021 doi

  17. [25]

    Yiheng Xu, Minghao Li, Lei Cui, Shaohan Huang, Furu Wei, and Ming Zhou. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1145/3394486.3403172 LayoutLM : Pre-training of text and layout for document image understanding . In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Disco...

    2020

  18. [26]

    Lee Giles

    Xiao Yang, Ersin Yumer, Paul Asente, Mike Kraley, Daniel Kifer, and C. Lee Giles. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2017.462 Learning to extract semantic structure from documents using multimodal fully convolutional neural networks . In 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision...

    2017 doi

  19. [27]

    Xinyi Zheng, Douglas Burdick, Lucian Popa, Xu Zhong, and Nancy Xin Ru Wang. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/WACV48630.2021.00074 Global table extractor ( GTE ): A framework for joint table identification and cell structure recognition using visual context . In 2021 IEEE Winter C...

    2021

  20. [28]

    Victor Zhong, Caiming Xiong, and Richard Socher. 2017. https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.00103 Seq2SQL : Generating structured queries from natural language using reinforcement learning . Preprint, arXiv:1709.00103

    2017 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Xu Zhong, Elaheh ShafieiBavani, and Antonio Jimeno Yepes. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58589-1_34 Image-based table recognition: Data, model, and evaluation . In Computer Vision -- ECCV 2020, pages 564--580, Cham. Springer International Publishing

    2020 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.