Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 36 references

PBDyG: Position Based Dynamic Gaussians for Motion-Aware Clothed Human Avatars

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Clothed human avatars with movement-dependent garments can be reconstructed from multiview RGB video by coupling Dynamic 3D Gaussians tracking with Position Based Dynamics and optimizing per-point mass and stiffness.

desk verdict Novel XPBD+3DGS avatar pipeline, but physical-parameter recovery is unvalidated and the eval is too thin to support the central claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.04433 v2 pith:HG2E2OAB submitted 2024-12-05 cs.CV

Shota Sasaki , Jane Wu , Ko Nishino This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords 3DGaussianSplattingclothedhumanavatarpositionbaseddynamicsclothsimulationphysicalparameterestimationdynamicreconstructionSMPLanimatable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the physical properties of a person's clothing, including local mass and material stiffness, can be recovered from ordinary multiview RGB video and used to reanimate a clothed human avatar whose loose garments deform with body motion, not just with pose. The key move is to model the whole clothed person as 3D Gaussians split into a rigid SMPL body and flexible cloth, then drive the cloth Gaussians with position-based dynamics instead of learned pose-conditioned deformation. If correct, the method turns passive video into a simulation-ready avatar that can be posed arbitrarily while skirts and coats swing, wrinkle, and settle under the recovered physics. The authors demonstrate this on subjects wearing highly deformable garments and introduce high-frequency evaluation metrics to argue that their reconstructions preserve clothing detail better than conventional metrics indicate.

What carries the argument

Position Based Dynamics (PBD) and its compliant variant XPBD form the engine of the method. The paper represents rigid body deformation with linear blend skinning on SMPL vertices and body Gaussians, and non-rigid cloth deformation with PBD acting on a sampled tetrahedral mesh: Delaunay triangulation builds connectivity, distance constraints plus AirMesh unilateral constraints keep the mesh from collapsing, and a ten-substep splitting prevents gravitational sag. The parameters optimized from video are the mass of each point and the compliance, or stiffness, of each constraint edge, with a custom interpolation rule carrying the deformation to unsampled Gaussians while preserving their anisotropy.

What would settle it

Track a multiview sequence of a person whose garment's true mass and stiffness are known, then simulate the same garment in a held-out, more energetic motion and compare the simulated cloth positions against video; if the recovered parameters fail to reproduce the deformation at the new motion scale, the claim of recovering physical properties is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that movement-dependent cloth deformation can be extracted from video by coupling Dynamic 3D Gaussians tracking with Position Based Dynamics, and that the simulation parameters, per-point mass and constraint compliance, can be optimized so that the simulated Gaussians reproduce the tracked trajectories. The avatar is built by rigging reconstructed Gaussians to an SMPL body, sampling about 10,000 points into a tetrahedral mesh, applying linear blend skinning to body points and PBD to cloth points, and minimizing the mean squared error between predicted and tracked cloth positions. This yields an animatable model in which cloth behavior is a function of body motion, not only skeletal pose.

Load-bearing premise

The method assumes the Dynamic 3D Gaussian tracker supplies drift-free, six-degree-of-freedom trajectories for every cloth Gaussian across all frames, so that the SMPL refinement and the PBD parameter fit have trustworthy reference positions to match.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • People wearing loose garments can be reconstructed as avatars whose cloth reacts to motion, enabling reanimation to movement sequences the recorded person never performed.
  • Physical parameters recovered from the video allow the avatar to be dropped into downstream physics engines for simulation-ready use.
  • SMPL fits improve by referencing the Gaussian reconstruction, a refinement that is useful independently of the full pipeline.
  • The proposed high-frequency metrics HF-SSIM and HF-PSNR suggest that standard PSNR and SSIM can miss real gains in cloth-detail fidelity in dynamic avatar reconstruction.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same body-plus-deformable-skin coupling could extend beyond clothing to hair, capes, or accessories by attaching a PBD layer to any skeleton-driven template.
  • If the tracking truly supplies six-degree-of-freedom trajectories, the recovered masses and stiffnesses could be compared across subjects and used as data for learning general cloth priors.
  • A testable extension is to check whether the estimated parameters predict cloth motion on faster or more energetic versions of the recorded motions, which would indicate that the parameters are physical rather than merely per-sequence fitting.
  • The high-frequency metrics could be applied to existing avatar methods, since lower conventional scores may hide genuinely better cloth geometry.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper introduces PBDyG, a method for learning animatable clothed human avatars from multiview RGB video. The approach first reconstructs a static 3D Gaussian Splatting model, tracks it over time with Dynamic 3D Gaussians, refines an SMPL body using the tracked Gaussians, and then embeds the Gaussian cloud in a tetrahedral mesh driven by extended Position Based Dynamics (XPBD). The authors claim that per-point masses and per-edge stiffnesses are estimated from video, enabling movement-dependent cloth deformation for loose garments such as skirts and coats. Experiments on the DNA-Rendering dataset compare against Animatable Gaussians using standard metrics plus two newly proposed high-frequency metrics, together with ablations of the AirMesh constraint and substep strategy.

Significance. If the central claim were fully supported, the paper would make a useful contribution: it proposes a holistic representation of body and clothing with contact preserved through a common tetrahedral mesh, and it attempts to recover physical parameters from video rather than from pre-scanned geometry. The use of XPBD with AirMesh constraints and the explicit handling of Gaussian anisotropy during deformation are sensible engineering choices, and the ablation studies on the AirMesh constraint and substep strategy provide some evidence about the internal workings of the method. The planned release of code and data is also a strength. However, the paper's headline contribution, the estimation of physically meaningful mass and stiffness from RGB video, is not validated by the current experiments. The quantitative evaluation is inconclusive because the baseline outperforms the proposed method on standard metrics and the newly introduced metrics are not independently justified. As a result, the significance of the work as presented remains uncertain.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3.3, Eq. (14)] The optimization of per-point masses M and per-edge compliances alpha is supervised only by LPBD, the mean squared error between XPBD-predicted positions and the Dynamic Gaussian tracking positions on the training frames. With roughly 10,000 sampled points (Sec. A.1) and about 30 training frames, this is a high-dimensional fit with no regularization and no independent check that the resulting parameters correspond to real material properties. The paper provides no experiment that transfers the trained avatar to a genuinely novel motion and compares the simulated cloth trajectory against ground truth, no synthetic test with known mass/stiffness values, and no cross-subject consistency check. Consequently, the abstract's claim that 'physical properties including mass and material stiffness are estimated from the RGB videos' is not established. Please add such experiments or temper the claim.
  2. [Sec. 4, Table 1 and Figs. 3-4] On the standard metrics (PSNR, SSIM, LPIPS), Animatable Gaussians is better in four of the six reported comparisons, and the proposed method is better only on the newly introduced HF-SSIM and HF-PSNR in some rows. These new metrics are introduced without any validation that they align with perceptual quality, and no confidence intervals or significance tests are reported. The statement that the qualitative results 'prove otherwise' is not an adequate substitute for statistical evidence. Please validate the new metrics against human judgments, report per-frame error distributions, and provide significance tests.
  3. [Sec. 3.1, Eqs. (7) and (14)] Both the SMPL refinement loss Ltrack and the physical parameter loss LPBD depend entirely on the trajectories produced by Dynamic 3D Gaussians. The paper does not analyze how tracking errors or drift on highly deformable garments such as skirts and coats propagate into the estimated masses and compliances. If the tracker locks onto the wrong surface point or drifts over time, the fitted PBD parameters are meaningless even if the renderings appear plausible. Please quantify tracking accuracy on the test sequences, or use synthetic sequences with known ground-truth motion to isolate this dependence.
  4. [Sec. 4, comparison set] The related work section identifies PhysAvatar, Gaussian Garments, and AniDress as the most similar approaches for recovering physical or garment-aware avatars, but none of these is included in the experimental comparison. Since the claimed advantage of PBDyG is specifically the estimation of physical properties and the handling of loose garments, the absence of any comparison against these methods leaves the contribution undemonstrated. Please add at least a qualitative comparison or a clear explanation of why a quantitative comparison is not feasible.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Table 1 caption] There is a typo: 'Quantatative' should be 'Quantitative'.
  2. [Sec. 5, Conclusion] The word 'convinient' should be 'convenient'.
  3. [Sec. 3.1, paragraph 3] The phrase 'track the set of Gaussians G that model the avatar clothese across all frames' contains a typo: 'clothese' should be 'clothes'.
  4. [Sec. 4.1, experimental setup] The description of the training/test split is ambiguous: it says the last 30 frames are used as test data, but also that training data consists of a selected frame and the following 30 frames. Please clarify whether the test frames overlap with the training frames or are strictly held out.
  5. [Fig. 5 caption] The caption reads 'Training PoseNovel Pose1Novel Pose2' without spaces; please separate the column labels for readability.
  6. [Sec. 3.2, Eq. (5)] The regularization losses are written as Lpreg = sum(||theta||^2) and Lsreg = sum(||beta||^2); please make the summation indices explicit for clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: PBD parameters are fitted to tracked Gaussian trajectories on training frames, but test frames are held out and novel-pose simulation is a forward prediction; the physical-property claim carries a validation gap rather than a circularity defect.

full rationale

PBDyG's derivation chain is not circular. The pipeline optimizes per-point masses and per-edge compliances by minimizing LPBD (Eq. 14), which compares PBD-simulated cloth positions against Dynamic 3D Gaussian tracks on the training frames. This is a standard system-identification objective: the parameters are minimizers of a forward-simulation fit, not quantities defined to be equal to the supervision. The statement that the fit 'reflects the actual material properties of the clothing' (Sec. 3.3) is an empirical assertion that is under-supported by the trajectory-reproduction loss alone, especially given the large number of free parameters and the absence of ground-truth material validation. However, the quantitative evaluation uses the last 30 frames, which are not included in the LPBD optimization, and the PBD layer is run forward from the last training frame, so the test-frame rendering is a genuine temporal extrapolation rather than a re-fitting of the same data. The novel-pose reanimations in Fig. 5 are likewise forward simulations with the fitted parameters. The newly introduced HF-SSIM and HF-PSNR metrics are post hoc and favor the method, but that is an evaluation-design concern, not a circularity of the derivation. No load-bearing self-citations appear, and no external theorem is imported from the authors. The central physical-parameter claim therefore carries an identifiability and validation risk, not a circularity defect.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The method rests on a long chain of assumptions: accurate SMPL fits, correct Dynamic 3D Gaussians tracking, a valid tetrahedral mesh, PBD or XPBD as an adequate cloth model, and a body or cloth split that is never described. The optimized masses and compliances are free parameters fitted to tracking data, and the loss weights and sampling counts are hand-set. No new physical entities such as particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced beyond the PBDyG representation itself.

free parameters (6)
  • per-point mass M = optimized via Eq. 14
    Fitted to minimize tracking position error; the paper claims it represents cloth material properties, but it is not independently measured.
  • per-edge compliance alpha = optimized via Eq. 14
    Fitted stiffness for each edge in the tetrahedral mesh; no independent physical measurement.
  • loss weights in SMPL refinement = not reported
    Weights lambda_align, lambda_verts, lambda_preg, lambda_sreg, lambda_track, lambda_keypoint in Eq. 6 and Eq. 8 are hand-set and their values are not given.
  • PBD sample count = 10000
    A subset of 10,000 points is sampled for simulation (Sec A.1); the choice is empirical.
  • neighborhood size k = 30
    Used in Eq. 15 and Eq. 16 to filter Delaunay tetrahedra; hand-chosen and not swept.
  • substep count = 10
    Each frame is divided into 10 PBD substeps; the ablation in Fig. 8 shows the choice matters, but the value is empirical.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Dynamic 3D Gaussians tracking provides correct, drift-free 6-DOF trajectories for all body and cloth Gaussians.
    Invoked in Sec 3.1 and used as supervision in Eq. 7 and Eq. 14. If tracking fails on loose garments, all downstream parameter learning is wrong.
  • domain assumption Gaussians can be reliably classified into body and cloth subsets.
    Required to define P'_body and P'_cloth in Eq. 11. The paper never states the classification procedure.
  • domain assumption Delaunay triangulation with k-NN filtering and AirMesh constraints produces a stable simulation mesh that preserves cloth flexibility.
    Described in Sec A.1 and Sec 3.3. The mesh quality and stability across subjects are not validated.
  • domain assumption PBD and XPBD with distance and AirMesh constraints are an adequate physical model for garments such as skirts and coats.
    The entire movement-dependent cloth deformation claim rests on this modeling choice; no comparison to other cloth models or ground truth physics is provided.
  • domain assumption Local rigidity of deformation holds for updating Gaussian anisotropy (Eq. 18 to Eq. 21).
    Used to update Gaussian rotations after PBD. The assumption may be violated in highly deformable cloth, but the paper relies on it without validation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of PBDyG: Position Based Dynamic Gaussians for Motion-Aware Clothed Human Avatars." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HG2E2OAB

@misc{pith2026241204433,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: PBDyG: Position Based Dynamic Gaussians for Motion-Aware Clothed Human Avatars},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HG2E2OAB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.04433}
}
read the original abstract

This paper introduces a novel clothed human model that can be learned from multiview RGB videos, with a particular emphasis on recovering physically accurate body and cloth movements. Our method, Position Based Dynamic Gaussians (PBDyG), realizes ``movement-dependent'' cloth deformation via physical simulation, rather than merely relying on ``pose-dependent'' rigid transformations. We model the clothed human holistically but with two distinct physical entities in contact: clothing modeled as 3D Gaussians, which are attached to a skinned SMPL body that follows the movement of the person in the input videos. The articulation of the SMPL body also drives physically-based simulation of the clothes' Gaussians to transform the avatar to novel poses. In order to run position based dynamics simulation, physical properties including mass and material stiffness are estimated from the RGB videos through Dynamic 3D Gaussian Splatting. Experiments demonstrate that our method not only accurately reproduces appearance but also enables the reconstruction of avatars wearing highly deformable garments, such as skirts or coats, which have been challenging to reconstruct using existing methods.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.04433 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Position Based Dynamic Gaussians (PBDyG) reconstructs a person from multiview videos such that their clothing deforms in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overview of our method. PBDyG learning consists of three main steps: 3D Gaussian reconstruction and tracking, SMPL fitting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Reconstruction comparison for Subject 0166. Our [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Reconstruction comparison for Subject 0206. Our re [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Example avatars reconstructed by our method. For each subject, the result on the left is in the training pose. The remaining [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: SMPL refinement results. Our method references the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Ablation study of substep strategy. “substep = k” means [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Anidress: Animatable loose- dressed avatar from sparse views using garment rigging model

    Beijia Chen, Yuefan Shen, Qing Shuai, Xiaowei Zhou, Kun Zhou, and Youyi Zheng. Anidress: Animatable loose- dressed avatar from sparse views using garment rigging model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.15348, 2024. 3

    arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    Gaussianavatar: Towards realistic human avatar modeling from a single video via animatable 3d gaussians

    Liangxiao Hu, Hongwen Zhang, Yuxiang Zhang, Boyao Zhou, Boning Liu, Shengping Zhang, and Liqiang Nie. Gaussianavatar: Towards realistic human avatar modeling from a single video via animatable 3d gaussians. In Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 634–644, 2024. 3

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Gauhuman: Articu- lated gaussian splatting from monocular human videos

    Shoukang Hu, Tao Hu, and Ziwei Liu. Gauhuman: Articu- lated gaussian splatting from monocular human videos. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vi- sion and Pattern Recognition, pages 20418–20431, 2024. 3

    2024

  4. [4]

    Humanrf: High-fidelity neural radiance fields for humans in motion

    Mustafa Is ¸ık, Martin R ¨unz, Markos Georgopoulos, Taras Khakhulin, Jonathan Starck, Lourdes Agapito, and Matthias Nießner. Humanrf: High-fidelity neural radiance fields for humans in motion. ACM TOG, 42(4):1–12, 2023. 2

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering

    Bernhard Kerbl, Georgios Kopanas, Thomas Leimk ¨uhler, and George Drettakis. 3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering. ACM TOG, 42(4):139–1, 2023. 2, 3, 9

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Hugs: Human gaussian splats

    Muhammed Kocabas, Jen-Hao Rick Chang, James Gabriel, Oncel Tuzel, and Anurag Ranjan. Hugs: Human gaussian splats. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on com- puter vision and pattern recognition , pages 505–515, 2024. 2, 3

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Neural human performer: Learning generalizable ra- diance fields for human performance rendering

    Youngjoong Kwon, Dahun Kim, Duygu Ceylan, and Henry Fuchs. Neural human performer: Learning generalizable ra- diance fields for human performance rendering. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:24741–24752,

  8. [8]

    Skin them bones: Game programming for the web generation

    Jeff Lander. Skin them bones: Game programming for the web generation. Game Developer Magazine , 5(1):10–18,

    work page

Show all 36 references
  1. [9]

    Gart: Gaussian articulated template mod- els

    Jiahui Lei, Yufu Wang, Georgios Pavlakos, Lingjie Liu, and Kostas Daniilidis. Gart: Gaussian articulated template mod- els. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 19876–19887,

  2. [10]

    Tava: Template-free animatable volumetric actors

    Ruilong Li, Julian Tanke, Minh V o, Michael Zollh ¨ofer, J¨urgen Gall, Angjoo Kanazawa, and Christoph Lassner. Tava: Template-free animatable volumetric actors. InECCV, pages 419–436. Springer, 2022. 2

    2022

  3. [11]

    Diffavatar: Simulation-ready garment optimization with differentiable simulation

    Yifei Li, Hsiao-yu Chen, Egor Larionov, Nikolaos Sarafi- anos, Wojciech Matusik, and Tuur Stuyck. Diffavatar: Simulation-ready garment optimization with differentiable simulation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 4368...

    2024

  4. [12]

    Ani- matable gaussians: Learning pose-dependent gaussian maps for high-fidelity human avatar modeling

    Zhe Li, Zerong Zheng, Lizhen Wang, and Yebin Liu. Ani- matable gaussians: Learning pose-dependent gaussian maps for high-fidelity human avatar modeling. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 19711–19722, 2024. 2, 3, 6, 7

    2024

  5. [13]

    Neural actor: Neural free-view synthesis of human actors with pose con- trol

    Lingjie Liu, Marc Habermann, Viktor Rudnev, Kripasindhu Sarkar, Jiatao Gu, and Christian Theobalt. Neural actor: Neural free-view synthesis of human actors with pose con- trol. ACM TOG, 40(6):1–16, 2021. 2

    2021

  6. [14]

    Smpl: A skinned multi- person linear model

    Matthew Loper, Naureen Mahmood, Javier Romero, Gerard Pons-Moll, and Michael J Black. Smpl: A skinned multi- person linear model. ACM TOG, 34(Article 248), 2015. 1, 2, 4

    2015

  7. [15]

    Dynamic 3d gaussians: Tracking by per- sistent dynamic view synthesis

    Jonathon Luiten, Georgios Kopanas, Bastian Leibe, and Deva Ramanan. Dynamic 3d gaussians: Tracking by per- sistent dynamic view synthesis. In 3DV, 2024. 2, 3

    2024

  8. [16]

    Xpbd: position-based simulation of compliant constrained dynamics

    Miles Macklin, Matthias M ¨uller, and Nuttapong Chentanez. Xpbd: position-based simulation of compliant constrained dynamics. In Proceedings of the 9th International Confer- ence on Motion in Games , pages 49–54, 2016. 5, 9

    2016

  9. [17]

    Joint-dependent local deformations for hand anima- tion and object grasping

    Thalmann Magnenat, Richard Laperri `ere, and Daniel Thal- mann. Joint-dependent local deformations for hand anima- tion and object grasping. In Proceedings of Graphics Inter- face’88, pages 26–33. Canadian Inf. Process. Soc, 1988. 3

    1988

  10. [18]

    Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view syn- thesis

    Ben Mildenhall, Pratul P Srinivasan, Matthew Tancik, Jonathan T Barron, Ravi Ramamoorthi, and Ren Ng. Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view syn- thesis. Communications of the ACM, 65(1):99–106, 2021. 1, 2

    2021

  11. [19]

    Human gaussian splatting: Real-time rendering of animatable avatars

    Arthur Moreau, Jifei Song, Helisa Dhamo, Richard Shaw, Yiren Zhou, and Eduardo P ´erez-Pellitero. Human gaussian splatting: Real-time rendering of animatable avatars. In Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 788–798, 2024. 2, 3 10

    2024

  12. [20]

    Position based dynamics

    Matthias M ¨uller, Bruno Heidelberger, Marcus Hennix, and John Ratcliff. Position based dynamics. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation , 18(2):109–118,

  13. [21]

    Air meshes for robust collision handling

    Matthias M ¨uller, Nuttapong Chentanez, Tae-Yong Kim, and Miles Macklin. Air meshes for robust collision handling. ACM TOG, 34(4), 2015. 6, 8

    2015

  14. [22]

    Ani- matable neural radiance fields for modeling dynamic human bodies

    Sida Peng, Junting Dong, Qianqian Wang, Shangzhan Zhang, Qing Shuai, Xiaowei Zhou, and Hujun Bao. Ani- matable neural radiance fields for modeling dynamic human bodies. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Con- ference on Computer Vision, pages 14314–14323, 2021. 2

    2021

  15. [23]

    Neural body: Implicit neural representations with structured latent codes for novel view synthesis of dynamic humans

    Sida Peng, Yuanqing Zhang, Yinghao Xu, Qianqian Wang, Qing Shuai, Hujun Bao, and Xiaowei Zhou. Neural body: Implicit neural representations with structured latent codes for novel view synthesis of dynamic humans. In CVPR,

  16. [24]

    3dgs-avatar: Animatable avatars via deformable 3d gaussian splatting

    Zhiyin Qian, Shaofei Wang, Marko Mihajlovic, Andreas Geiger, and Siyu Tang. 3dgs-avatar: Animatable avatars via deformable 3d gaussian splatting. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 5020–5030, 2024. 1, 2, 3

    2024

  17. [25]

    Gaussian garments: Reconstruct- ing simulation-ready clothing with photorealistic appearance from multi-view video

    Boxiang Rong, Artur Grigorev, Wenbo Wang, Michael J Black, Bernhard Thomaszewski, Christina Tsalicoglou, and Otmar Hilliges. Gaussian garments: Reconstruct- ing simulation-ready clothing with photorealistic appearance from multi-view video. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.08189 ,

    arXiv

  18. [26]

    3d human pose estimation: A review of the literature and analysis of covariates

    Nikolaos Sarafianos, Bogdan Boteanu, Bogdan Ionescu, and Ioannis A Kakadiaris. 3d human pose estimation: A review of the literature and analysis of covariates. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 152:1–20, 2016. 1

    2016

  19. [27]

    Neuralhumanfvv: Real-time neural volumetric human performance rendering using rgb cameras

    Xin Suo, Yuheng Jiang, Pei Lin, Yingliang Zhang, Minye Wu, Kaiwen Guo, and Lan Xu. Neuralhumanfvv: Real-time neural volumetric human performance rendering using rgb cameras. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 6226–6237,

  20. [28]

    Arah: Animatable volume rendering of articulated hu- man sdfs

    Shaofei Wang, Katja Schwarz, Andreas Geiger, and Siyu Tang. Arah: Animatable volume rendering of articulated hu- man sdfs. In ECCV, pages 1–19. Springer, 2022. 2

    2022

  21. [29]

    Intrinsicavatar: Physically based inverse rendering of dynamic humans from monocular videos via explicit ray tracing

    Shaofei Wang, Bozidar Antic, Andreas Geiger, and Siyu Tang. Intrinsicavatar: Physically based inverse rendering of dynamic humans from monocular videos via explicit ray tracing. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 1877– ...

    2024

  22. [30]

    Hu- mannerf: Free-viewpoint rendering of moving people from monocular video

    Chung-Yi Weng, Brian Curless, Pratul P Srinivasan, Jonathan T Barron, and Ira Kemelmacher-Shlizerman. Hu- mannerf: Free-viewpoint rendering of moving people from monocular video. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF con- ference on computer vision and pattern Recognition , pages 162...

    2022

  23. [31]

    Dressing avatars: Deep photorealistic appearance for physically simu- lated clothing

    Donglai Xiang, Timur Bagautdinov, Tuur Stuyck, Fabian Prada, Javier Romero, Weipeng Xu, Shunsuke Saito, Jing- fan Guo, Breannan Smith, Takaaki Shiratori, et al. Dressing avatars: Deep photorealistic appearance for physically simu- lated clothing. ACM TOG, 41(6):1–15, 2022. 3

    2022

  24. [32]

    Relightable and animatable neural avatar from sparse-view video

    Zhen Xu, Sida Peng, Chen Geng, Linzhan Mou, Zihan Yan, Jiaming Sun, Hujun Bao, and Xiaowei Zhou. Relightable and animatable neural avatar from sparse-view video. InPro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 990–1000, 2024. 2, 3

    2024

  25. [33]

    Monohuman: Animatable human neu- ral field from monocular video

    Zhengming Yu, Wei Cheng, Xian Liu, Wayne Wu, and Kwan-Yee Lin. Monohuman: Animatable human neu- ral field from monocular video. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 16943–16953, 2023. 2

    2023

  26. [34]

    Efros, Eli Shecht- man, and Oliver Wang

    Richard Zhang, Phillip Isola, Alexei A. Efros, Eli Shecht- man, and Oliver Wang. The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metric . In CVPR, pages 586– 595, 2018. 6

    2018

  27. [35]

    Humannerf: Efficiently gen- erated human radiance field from sparse inputs

    Fuqiang Zhao, Wei Yang, Jiakai Zhang, Pei Lin, Yingliang Zhang, Jingyi Yu, and Lan Xu. Humannerf: Efficiently gen- erated human radiance field from sparse inputs. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 7743–7753, 2022. 2

    2022

  28. [36]

    Physa- vatar: Learning the physics of dressed 3d avatars from visual observations

    Yang Zheng, Qingqing Zhao, Guandao Yang, Wang Yi- fan, Donglai Xiang, Florian Dubost, Dmitry Lagun, Thabo Beeler, Federico Tombari, Leonidas Guibas, et al. Physa- vatar: Learning the physics of dressed 3d avatars from visual observations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.04421, 2024. 2, 3 11

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.