Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 68 references

Designing Flat Bands and Pseudo-Landau Levels in GaAs with Patterned Gates

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A patterned gate can turn a GaAs two-dimensional electron gas into a flat-band system with pseudo-Landau levels, exactly solvable through Mathieu equations.

desk verdict A useful design proposal for flat bands in patterned GaAs, with a correctable factor-of-two error in the advertised Mathieu mapping that undermines the exact spectrum but not the qualitative picture. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.04547 v3 pith:DVJ6TQ3Y submitted 2024-12-05 cond-mat.mes-hall

Pierre A. Pantaleon , Zhen Zhan , Siddhartha E. Morales , Gerardo G. Naumis This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords patternedgatestwo-dimensionalelectrongasflatbandspseudo-LandaulevelsMathieuequationssuperlatticepotentialBerrycurvatureHartreescreening
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to show that a periodically patterned metallic gate placed near a GaAs two-dimensional electron gas can do more than weakly modulate the electrons: at sufficient gate strength it confines each electron near the minima of a cosine superlattice potential, producing flat bands that resemble Landau levels. To make this precise, the paper keeps only the first harmonic of the gate potential and reduces the Schrödinger equation to a pair of Mathieu equations, which are exactly solvable. In the strong-confinement limit the spectrum is $E_{n_1,n_2} = \hbar\omega_1(n_1+1/2)+\hbar\omega_2(n_2+1/2)-8W$ with $\omega_j = 2G_j\sqrt{W/m^*}$, so the flatness and level spacing are controlled by the gate amplitude $W$ and the lattice period $L$. This makes flat-band physics accessible in a conventional semiconductor device, tunable by gate voltage and requiring no external magnetic field.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing device is the reduction of the two-dimensional Schrödinger equation to a pair of Mathieu equations of the form $d^2\theta/dt^2 + [a-2q\cos(2t)]\theta=0$, one for each lattice direction; the Mathieu stability chart then plays the role of the band structure, with stable regions as bands and unstable regions as gaps. The controlling parameter is $q_j = 16m^*|W|/(\hbar^2 G_j^2)$, the ratio of potential energy to quasi-free kinetic energy along direction $j$; for $q_j\gg1$ the Mathieu solutions near each potential minimum reduce to Hermite-Gaussian functions, yielding the pseudo-Landau spectrum $E_{n_1,n_2}=\hbar\omega_1(n_1+1/2)+\hbar\omega_2(n_2+1/2)-8W$. Complementary machinery is the Fourier/plane-wave representation that tracks band evolution for weaker potentials, the $\phi_j = \pm\pi/2$ phase choice that breaks inversion symmetry, and the self-consistent Hartree formula $\rho_H(\mathbf{G})$ used to incorporate electron-electron screening.

What would settle it

A decisive test is to measure the low-energy spectrum of a square-patterned GaAs gate by tunnelling or capacitance spectroscopy for both signs of the gate voltage; the predicted square-lattice spectrum is unchanged under $W\to -W$ and shows the pseudo-Landau spacing $\hbar\omega_c = 4\pi\hbar/L \sqrt{W/m^*}$ in the strong-confinement limit, so observing either a polarity-asymmetric spectrum or a different level spacing would falsify the Mathieu description.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that, in the strong-confinement regime, a periodic patterned gate creates a synthetic magnetic-like confinement in a GaAs 2DEG. Because the superlattice potential is periodic, the spectrum remains organized in bands, but the lowest bands become almost flat and evenly spaced, with oscillator frequencies $\omega_j = 2G_j\sqrt{W/m^*}$; this is the pseudo-Landau-level limit, with the minima of the potential acting as quantum-dot-like wells whose small inter-cell overlap broadens the discrete dot levels into narrow bands. For square and rectangular lattices the phase of the potential can be removed by a translation, so the spectrum is symmetric under $W\to -W$; for triangular lattices the phase survives and flipping the sign of $W$ changes the ground-state charge pattern from honeycomb-like to triangular. The paper also claims that setting the relative phase between harmonics to $\pm\pi/2$ breaks inversion symmetry and generates nonzero local Berry curvature with zero total Chern number, and that self-consistent Hartree screening opposes the bare potential in the symmetric case while producing a mixed odd/even potential in the antisymmetric case.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the two-dimensional electron gas sits far enough from the patterned gate that the electrostatic potential is dominated by the first reciprocal-lattice harmonic, so all sharper Fourier components decay away before reaching the electrons.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Flat, pseudo-Landau-like bands appear when $q_j\gg1$, i.e. for large gate amplitude or long lattice period, so the device is tunable in situ by gate voltage.
  • For square and rectangular lattices the spectrum is unchanged when the sign of $W$ is reversed; for triangular lattices the sign changes the ground-state charge pattern between honeycomb and triangular structures.
  • Breaking inversion symmetry by choosing a relative harmonic phase $\pm\pi/2$ opens a gap and gives isolated bands a nonzero local Berry phase but a zero Chern number, resembling gapped graphene.
  • Symmetric Hartree screening reduces the effective superlattice potential, while antisymmetric potentials acquire screened odd/even components that can further renormalise the bands.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extension: if the first-harmonic reduction holds, the same design should work in other 2DEG materials, with the pseudo-Landau-level spacing scaling as $m^{*-1/2}$, so the effective mass is the main material lever.
  • Extension: a direct spectroscopy experiment on a square-patterned gate, comparing spectra for opposite gate polarities, would test both the sign-invariance claim and the underlying Mathieu description.
  • Extension: at partial filling of a pseudo-Landau level, the Hartree result implies the effective potential softens; a natural next step is to search for interaction-driven gaps or superconducting analogues, though the paper does not claim those.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies a two-dimensional electron gas in GaAs subjected to a periodic patterned-gate potential. Restricting the potential to its first reciprocal-lattice harmonics gives U(r)=2W Σ cos(G_j·r+φ_j), for which the Schrödinger equation separates into Mathieu equations in square and rectangular geometries. The authors derive exact Mathieu-function solutions, analyze the large-q (strong-confinement) limit as pseudo-Landau levels with energies given by Eqs. (22)–(24), and present analogous harmonic-oscillator spectra for triangular lattices. Plane-wave band-structure calculations (Fig. 3) are used to follow the evolution from weakly modulated bands to flat bands, and an antisymmetric phase choice is shown to generate local Berry curvature. A self-consistent Hartree treatment (Figs. 4–5) is added to study screening of the superlattice potential.

Significance. The qualitative message—that a single cosine superlattice of modest amplitude can produce flat bands and pseudo-Landau levels in a standard GaAs 2DEG—is physically appealing and supported by the plane-wave numerical band structures, which do not rely on the disputed analytical mapping. The stability-chart interpretation and the Hartree analysis add useful perspective, and the model is not circular: W is a physical input scanned across the phase diagram rather than a parameter fitted to flat bands. The main caveat, acknowledged by the authors in footnote [39], is that the first-harmonic reduction of the gate potential limits quantitative device-level predictions. If the analytical spectrum is corrected, the paper offers a simple design principle for flat-band engineering in semiconductor heterostructures.

major comments (1)
  1. [Sec. III C, Eqs. (16)–(22)] The Mathieu mapping is internally inconsistent by a factor of two. Substituting t=G_j x/2 into Eq. (14) gives d²X/dt² + [8m*E_j/(ℏ²G_j²) - (16m*W/(ℏ²G_j²)) cos(2t)]X=0. Comparing with the standard form stated in Eq. (16), d²θ/dt² + [a - 2q cos(2t)]θ=0, yields q_j = 8m*|W|/(ℏ²G_j²), not q_j = 16m*|W|/(ℏ²G_j²) as written in Eq. (17). With the corrected q, the large-q formula Eq. (21) leads to the 1D energy E_j = -2W + ℏ G_j sqrt(2W/m*)(n_j+1/2), so the square-lattice spectrum is E_{n1,n2} = -4W + ℏ G sqrt(2W/m*)(n1+n2+1), not Eq. (22)/(24). The printed Eq. (22) has frequencies too large by sqrt(2) and an offset -8W that places the ground state 4W below the actual minimum of U(r)=-4W. Because Eqs. (22)–(24) are advertised as the exact analytical Landau-level spectrum and are used to interpret the numerical bands, this is a load-bearing error; the plane-wave results in Fig. 3 are not invalidated, but any quantitative use of Eqs. (22)–(24) for parameter extraction or comparison with experiment requires repair.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (7)] Equation (7) contains a dimensional mismatch: the argument of the third cosine is written as G_3·r' + (φ+G_3)·r_0, which adds a scalar φ to a vector G_3. The intended expression is G_3·r' + G_3·r_0 + φ, which yields the 3φ factor in Eq. (8).
  2. [Appendix A, Eq. (A4)] Equation (A4) defines the dimensionless energy as ϵ = α = 2m*E/(ℏ²|G|²), which equates a dimensionless energy with the dimensionless coupling α of Eq. (A3) except when E=W. This appears to be a typo; ϵ should be defined independently of α.
  3. [Sec. III C, transition condition] The sentence 'The transition start to occur once q_{1,2} > a_{1,2}/2, i.e., E_1 < 16W and E_2 < 16W' is arithmetically inconsistent even with the printed definitions: from Eqs. (17), q>a/2 gives E < 4W, not E < 16W. This threshold sentence should be corrected together with the Mathieu mapping.
  4. [Sec. II, footnote [39]] The first-harmonic approximation in Eq. (4) is a significant simplification, and the text correctly notes that a full self-consistent Poisson–Schrödinger solution is needed for a real device geometry. This limitation should be restated in the conclusions so that the quantitative predictions are not overinterpreted.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the flat-band/pseudo-Landau spectrum is derived from the stated cosine-superlattice Hamiltonian without fitting; the only self-citation supports a modeling approximation that the paper explicitly flags as device-dependent.

full rationale

I checked the derivation chain. The central spectral claim (Eqs. 22-25) is obtained by: (i) writing the model Hamiltonian (Eq. 5) with a specified cosine superlattice potential (Eq. 6); (ii) separating the Schrodinger equation (Eqs. 14-15); (iii) mapping each 1D equation to Mathieu's equation and using the standard large-q approximation (Eq. 21); and (iv) converting a,q back to energies and frequencies via Eq. (17). No parameter in those steps is fitted to the flat bands or to any target spectrum: W, L, and m* are inputs scanned in the phase diagram and in the independent plane-wave calculations of Fig. 3. The plane-wave band structure is a separate numerical check, not a fit to the analytical formula. The Hartree calculation (Eqs. 53-54) is standard self-consistent mean-field theory and is not used to define a benchmark that the analytical spectrum must reproduce. The only self-citation that affects the model, Ref. [7] in Eq. (4) and footnote 39, is used to justify keeping the first harmonics of the patterned-gate potential; this is a physical approximation explicitly flagged by the paper as requiring a full Poisson-Schrodinger solution for a real device. Thus the exact analytical results are exact for the model, not for the device, and the derivation does not reduce to its own inputs. The skeptic-flagged factor-of-two issue in the Mathieu parameter q_j is an internal consistency/correctness concern, not a circularity, and therefore does not change this verdict.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a simplified single-particle model: a first-harmonic cosine potential, an effective-mass Schrödinger equation, and a first-Fourier-component Hartree approximation. No new particles, forces, dimensions, or conserved quantities are introduced. The main unverified premise is the first-harmonic truncation of the device potential.

free parameters (4)
  • W (superlattice amplitude) = 0.25, 1.0, 3.0 meV in Figs. 3-5
    Tunable model input representing the gate-induced potential strength; the phase diagram is a scan over W, not a fit to data.
  • L (superlattice period) = 130 nm
    Device geometry choice used in all numerical band-structure calculations.
  • phi (harmonic phase) = 0 for symmetric potential, pi/2 for antisymmetric potential
    Symmetry-control parameter; the Berry curvature result depends on choosing phi = pi/2.
  • nu (Hartree filling fraction) = 1.1 in Sec. VII A
    Chosen by hand for the screening estimate V_H = -2.0 meV; the Hartree result depends on this filling value.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The patterned-gate potential at the 2DEG plane is dominated by the first reciprocal-lattice harmonics, giving U(r) = 2W*sum cos(G_j*r + phi_j) (Eq. 4).
    Justifies replacing the true gate potential with a single-harmonic cosine model; if the 2DEG is not far enough from the gate, higher harmonics matter.
  • domain assumption The 2DEG is described by a single-band effective-mass Schrödinger equation with m* = 0.067 m_e.
    Standard for GaAs 2DEGs; neglects band nonparabolicity, finite quantum-well thickness, and disorder.
  • standard math Floquet theory and Mathieu stability-chart results are used to identify bands and gaps.
    The paper relies on the standard properties of Mathieu functions and Floquet theory without reproving them.
  • domain assumption The Hartree potential is approximated by the first Fourier component of the self-consistent charge density (Eqs. 53 and 54).
    The screening calculation keeps only |G| = |G_1| components; the paper notes that higher components may be needed for higher filling.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Designing Flat Bands and Pseudo-Landau Levels in GaAs with Patterned Gates." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DVJ6TQ3Y

@misc{pith2026241204547,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Designing Flat Bands and Pseudo-Landau Levels in GaAs with Patterned Gates},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DVJ6TQ3Y}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.04547}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate the electronic properties of two-dimensional electron gases (2DEGs) subjected to a periodic patterned gate. By incorporating the superlattice (SL) potential induced by patterning into the Schrodinger equation, we develop a methodology for obtaining exact analytical solutions. These solutions enable us to construct a comprehensive phase diagram illustrating the emergence of narrow bands and pseudo-Landau levels driven by the SL potential. To complement the analytical approach, we employ a standard plane-wave formalism to track the evolution of the band structure as the SL strength increases. By breaking the inversion symmetry of the SL potential, we found a nontrivial Berry curvature. Furthermore, we introduce a self-consistent Hartree screening to account for the interplay between the SL potential and electronic interactions. Our findings not only reveal the emergence of a non-trivial quantum geometry and a competition between SL strength and electron-electron interactions, but also highlight the value of exact analytical solutions for understanding and engineering electronic phases in patterned 2DEG systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.04547 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematics of a patterned gate acting on a GaAs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Mathieu equation stability chart, here correspond [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Electronic structure of GaAs subjected to a patterned SL potential. Top and middle rows are the bands with a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Electronic structure of a 2DEGs subjected to an antisymmetric scalar SL potential with (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Electronic structure of GaAs subjected to an an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Electronic structure of GaAs subjected to a SL [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [39]

    We note that an exact solution for a patterned gate act- ing in a 2DEG strongly depends on the geometry of the device and a full self-consistent Poisson-Schrodinger is then required [7]

    work page

  2. [1]

    Albrecht, J

    C. Albrecht, J. H. Smet, D. Weiss, K. von Klitzing, R. Hennig, M. Langenbuch, M. Suhrke, U. R¨ ossler, V. Umansky, and H. Schweizer, Fermiology of two- dimensional lateral superlattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 2234 (1999)

    work page 1999

  3. [2]

    Duffield, R

    T. Duffield, R. Bhat, M. Koza, F. DeRosa, D. M. Hwang, P. Grabbe, and S. J. Allen, Electron mass tunneling along the growth direction of (al,ga) as/gaas semiconductor su- perlattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.56, 2724 (1986)

    work page 1986

  4. [4]

    D. Q. Wang, D. Reuter, A. D. Wieck, A. R. Hamilton, and O. Klochan, Two-dimensional lateral surface super- lattices in gaas heterostructures with independent con- trol of carrier density and modulation potential, Applied Physics Letters117, 10.1063/5.0009462 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0009462 2020

  5. [5]

    K. K. Gomes, W. Mar, W. Ko, F. Guinea, and H. C. Manoharan, Designer dirac fermions and topological phases in molecular graphene, Nature483, 306–310 (2012)

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    T. Tan, A. P. Reddy, L. Fu, and T. Devakul, Design- ing topology and fractionalization in narrow gap semi- conductor films via electrostatic engineering, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 206601 (2024)

    2024

  7. [7]

    Z. Zhan, Y. Li, and P. A. Pantale´ on, Designing band structures by patterned dielectric superlattices, Phys. Rev. B111, 045148 (2025)

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    S. A. A. Ghorashi and J. Cano, Multilayer graphene with a superlattice potential, Physical Review B107, 10.1103/physrevb.107.195423 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.107.195423 2023

Show all 68 references
  1. [10]

    Z. E. Krix and O. P. Sushkov, Patterned bilayer graphene as a tunable strongly correlated system, Physical Review B107, 10.1103/physrevb.107.165158 (2023)

    2023 doi

  2. [11]

    A. V. Chubukov and S. A. Kivelson, Superconductivity in engineered two-dimensional electron gases, Phys. Rev. B96, 174514 (2017)

    2017

  3. [12]

    Phillips, Y

    P. Phillips, Y. Wan, I. Martin, S. Knysh, and D. Dali- dovich, Superconductivity in a two-dimensional electron gas, Nature395, 253–257 (1998)

    1998

  4. [13]

    Raghu and S

    S. Raghu and S. A. Kivelson, Superconductivity from re- pulsive interactions in the two-dimensional electron gas, Phys. Rev. B83, 094518 (2011)

    2011

  5. [14]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Unconventional super- conductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Na- ture556, 43 (2018)

    2018

  6. [15]

    Y. Xie, A. T. Pierce, J. M. Park, D. E. Parker, E. Khalaf, P. Ledwith, Y. Cao, S. H. Lee, S. Chen, P. R. Forrester, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Vishwanath, P. Jarillo- Herrero, and A. Yacoby, Fractional chern insulators in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Nature600, 439 (2021)

    2021

  7. [16]

    J. M. Park, Y. Cao, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Tunable strongly coupled supercon- ductivity in magic-angle twisted trilayer graphene, Na- ture590, 249 (2021)

    2021

  8. [17]

    H. Tian, X. Gao, Y. Zhang, S. Che, T. Xu, P. Che- ung, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. Randeria, F. Zhang, C. N. Lau, and M. W. Bockrath, Evidence for dirac flat band superconductivity enabled by quantum geometry, Nature614, 440–444 (2023)

    2023

  9. [18]

    S. A. Chen and K. T. Law, Ginzburg-landau theory of flat-band superconductors with quantum metric, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 026002 (2024)

    2024

  10. [19]

    J. Wang, J. Cano, A. J. Millis, Z. Liu, and B. Yang, Exact landau level description of geometry and interaction in a flatband, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 246403 (2021)

    2021

  11. [20]

    F. K. Popov and A. Milekhin, Hidden wave function of twisted bilayer graphene: The flat band as a landau level, Phys. Rev. B103, 155150 (2021)

    2021

  12. [21]

    Sheffer and A

    Y. Sheffer and A. Stern, Chiral magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene in a magnetic field: Landau level correspondence, exact wave functions, and fractional Chern insulators, Phys. Rev. B104, L121405 (2021), arXiv:2106.10650 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2021 arXiv

  13. [22]

    Andrade, F

    E. Andrade, F. L´ opez-Ur ´ ıas, and G. G. Naumis, Topolog- ical origin of flat bands as pseudo-landau levels in uniax- ial strained graphene nanoribbons and induced magnetic ordering due to electron-electron interactions, Phys. Rev. B107, 235143 (2023)

    2023

  14. [23]

    Forsythe, X

    C. Forsythe, X. Zhou, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Pa- supathy, P. Moon, M. Koshino, P. Kim, and C. R. Dean, Band structure engineering of 2d materials using pat- terned dielectric superlattices, Nature Nanotechnology 13, 566–571 (2018). 14

    2018

  15. [24]

    Huber, M.-H

    R. Huber, M.-H. Liu, S.-C. Chen, M. Drienovsky, A. Sandner, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. Richter, D. Weiss, and J. Eroms, Gate-tunable two-dimensional superlattices in graphene, Nano Letters20, 8046 (2020)

    2020

  16. [25]

    Barcons Ruiz, H

    D. Barcons Ruiz, H. Herzig Sheinfux, R. Hoffmann, I. Torre, H. Agarwal, R. K. Kumar, L. Vistoli, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, A. Bachtold, and F. H. L. Koppens, Engineering high quality graphene super- lattices via ion milled ultra-thin etching masks, Na- ture Communications13, ...

    2022 doi

  17. [26]

    S. Wang, Z. Zhan, X. Fan, Y. Li, P. A. Pantale´ on, C. Ye, Z. He, L. Wei, L. Li, F. Guinea, S. Yuan, and C. Zeng, Dispersion-selective band engineering in an ar- tificial kagome superlattice, Physical Review Letters133, 10.1103/physrevlett.133.066302 (2024)

    2024 doi

  18. [27]

    L. Du, Z. Liu, S. J. Wind, V. Pellegrini, K. W. West, S. Fallahi, L. N. Pfeiffer, M. J. Manfra, and A. Pinczuk, Observation of flat bands in gated semiconductor artifi- cial graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 106402 (2021)

    2021

  19. [28]

    N´ advorn ´ ık, M

    L. N´ advorn ´ ık, M. Orlita, N. A. Goncharuk, L. Smrˇ cka, V. Nov´ ak, V. Jurka, K. Hruˇ ska, Z. V´ yborn´ y, Z. R. Wasilewski, M. Potemski, and K. V´ yborn´ y, From lat- erally modulated two-dimensional electron gas towards artificial graphene, New Journal of Physics14, 0530...

    2012

  20. [29]

    O. P. Sushkov and A. H. Castro Neto, Topological insu- lating states in laterally patterned ordinary semiconduc- tors, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 186601 (2013)

    2013

  21. [30]

    H. D. Scammell and O. P. Sushkov, Tuning the topolog- ical insulator states of artificial graphene, Phys. Rev. B 99, 085419 (2019)

    2019

  22. [31]

    Peotta and P

    S. Peotta and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Superfluidity in topologically nontrivial flat bands, Nature Communications6, 8944 (2015)

    2015

  23. [32]

    S. Wang, D. Scarabelli, L. Du, Y. Y. Kuznetsova, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. West, G. C. Gardner, M. J. Manfra, V. Pellegrini, S. J. Wind, and A. Pinczuk, Observa- tion of dirac bands in artificial graphene in small-period nanopatterned gaas quantum wells, Nature Nanotechnol- ogy13,...

    2017

  24. [33]

    N. A. Franchina Vergel, L. C. Post, D. Sciacca, M. Berthe, F. Vaurette, Y. Lambert, D. Yarekha, D. Troadec, C. Coinon, G. Fleury, G. Patriarche, T. Xu, L. Desplanque, X. Wallart, D. Vanmaekelbergh, C. Delerue, and B. Grandidier, Engineering a robust flat band in iii–v semicond...

    2021

  25. [34]

    D. Q. Wang, Z. Krix, O. A. Tkachenko, V. A. Tkachenko, C. Chen, I. Farrer, D. A. Ritchie, O. P. Sushkov, A. R. Hamilton, and O. Klochan, Tuning the band- structure of electrons in a two-dimensional artificial elec- trostatic crystal in gaas quantum wells, arXiv (2024), arXiv:2...

    2024 arXiv

  26. [35]

    D. Q. Wang, Z. Krix, O. P. Sushkov, I. Farrer, D. A. Ritchie, A. R. Hamilton, and O. Klochan, Formation of artificial fermi surfaces with a triangular superlattice on a conventional two-dimensional electron gas, Nano Letters 23, 1705–1710 (2023)

    2023

  27. [36]

    T. Li, J. Ingham, and H. D. Scammell, Artificial graphene: Unconventional superconductivity in a hon- eycomb superlattice, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 043155 (2020)

    2020

  28. [37]

    H. D. Scammell, J. Ingham, M. Geier, and T. Li, Intrinsic first- and higher-order topological superconductivity in a doped topological insulator, Phys. Rev. B105, 195149 (2022)

    2022

  29. [38]

    O. A. Tkachenko, V. A. Tkachenko, I. S. Terekhov, and O. P. Sushkov, Effects of coulomb screening and disorder on an artificial graphene based on nanopatterned semi- conductor, 2D Materials2, 014010 (2015)

    2015

  30. [40]

    Guinea and T

    F. Guinea and T. Low, Band structure and gaps of trian- gular graphene superlattices, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and En- gineering Sciences368, 5391–5402 (2010)

    2010

  31. [41]

    J. R. Wallbank, A. A. Patel, M. Mucha-Kruczy´ nski, A. K. Geim, and V. I. Fal’Ko, Generic miniband structure of graphene on a hexagonal substrate, Physical Review B87, 245408 (2013)

    2013

  32. [42]

    San-Jose, A

    P. San-Jose, A. Guti´ errez-Rubio, M. Sturla, and F. Guinea, Spontaneous strains and gap in graphene on boron nitride, Physical Review B90, 075428 (2014)

    2014

  33. [43]

    J. Jung, A. M. Dasilva, A. H. Macdonald, and S. Adam, Origin of band gaps in graphene on hexagonal boron ni- tride, Nature Communications6, 10.1038/ncomms7308 (2015), arXiv:1403.0496

    2015 arXiv

  34. [45]

    Macucci, K

    M. Macucci, K. Hess, and G. J. Iafrate, Electronic en- ergy spectrum and the concept of capacitance in quan- tum dots, Phys. Rev. B48, 17354 (1993)

    1993

  35. [46]

    McLachlan,Theory and Application of Mathieu Func- tions, Dover books on engineering and engineering physics (Dover Publications, 1964)

    N. McLachlan,Theory and Application of Mathieu Func- tions, Dover books on engineering and engineering physics (Dover Publications, 1964)

    1964

  36. [47]

    S. A. Wilkinson, N. Vogt, D. S. Golubev, and J. H. Cole, Approximate solutions to mathieu’s equation, Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures100, 24 (2018)

    2018

  37. [48]

    Song and B

    Z.-D. Song and B. A. Bernevig, Magic-angle twisted bi- layer graphene as a topological heavy fermion problem, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 047601 (2022)

    2022

  38. [49]

    Mucha-Kruczy´ nski, J

    M. Mucha-Kruczy´ nski, J. R. Wallbank, and V. I. Fal’Ko, Heterostructures of bilayer graphene and h-BN: Interplay between misalignment, interlayer asymmetry, and trigo- nal warping, Phys. Rev. B88, 205418 (2013)

    2013

  39. [50]

    J. Jung, E. Laksono, A. M. Dasilva, A. H. Macdonald, M. Mucha-Kruczy´ nski, and S. Adam, Moir´ e band model and band gaps of graphene on hexagonal boron nitride, Physical Review B96, 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.085442 (2017)

    2017 doi

  40. [51]

    San-Jose, A

    P. San-Jose, A. Guti´ errez-Rubio, M. Sturla, and F. Guinea, Electronic structure of spontaneously strained graphene on hexagonal boron nitride, Physical Review B 90, 115152 (2014)

    2014

  41. [52]

    San-Jose, J

    P. San-Jose, J. Gonz´ alez, and F. Guinea, Non-abelian gauge potentials in graphene bilayers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 216802 (2012)

    2012

  42. [53]

    L. A. Navarro-Labastida, A. Espinosa-Champo, E. Aguilar-Mendez, and G. G. Naumis, Why the first magic-angle is different from others in twisted graphene bilayers: Interlayer currents, kinetic and confinement energy, and wave-function localization, 15 Phys. Rev. B105, 115434 (2022)

    2022

  43. [54]

    Rademaker and P

    L. Rademaker and P. Mellado, Charge-transfer insulation in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B98, 235158 (2018)

    2018

  44. [55]

    J. Sun, S. A. Akbar Ghorashi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, F. Camino, J. Cano, and X. Du, Signature of correlated insulator in electric field controlled super- lattice, Nano Letters24, 13600–13606 (2024)

    2024

  45. [57]

    L.-k. Shi, J. Ma, and J. C. W. Song, Gate-tunable flat bands in van der waals patterned dielectric superlattices, 2D Materials7, 015028 (2019)

    2019

  46. [58]

    Y. Shi, B. Xie, F. Ren, X. Cai, Z. Guo, Q. Li, X. Lu, Z. Liu, and J. Liu, Fractional topological states in rhom- bohedral multilayer graphene modulated by kagome su- perlattice, arXiv 10.48550/ARXIV.2502.17320 (2025)

    2025 doi arXiv

  47. [59]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1959 (2010)

    2010

  48. [60]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Model for a quantum hall effect with- out landau levels: Condensed-matter realization of the ”parity anomaly”, Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 2015 (1988)

    1988

  49. [61]

    K. S. Novoselov, E. McCann, S. V. Morozov, V. I. Fal’ko, M. I. Katsnelson, U. Zeitler, D. Jiang, F. Schedin, and A. K. Geim, Unconventional quantum hall effect and berry’s phase of 2πin bilayer graphene, Nature Physics 2, 177–180 (2006)

    2006

  50. [62]

    J. Gu, J. Zhu, P. Knuppel, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Remote imprinting of moir´ e lattices, Nature Materials23, 219–223 (2024)

    2024

  51. [63]

    Zhang, J

    Z. Zhang, J. Xie, W. Zhao, R. Qi, C. Sanborn, S. Wang, S. Kahn, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Zettl, M. Crom- mie, and F. Wang, Engineering correlated insulators in bilayer graphene with a remote coulomb superlattice, Na- ture Materials23, 189–195 (2024)

    2024

  52. [64]

    M. He, J. Cai, H. Zheng, E. Seewald, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. Yan, M. Yankowitz, A. Pasupathy, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Dynamically tunable moir´ e exciton rydberg states in a monolayer semiconductor on twisted bilayer graphene, Nature Materials23, 224–229 (2024)

    2024

  53. [65]

    J.-H. Zeng, Q. Zhu, and L. He, Dynamical moir´ e sys- tems in twisted bilayer optical lattices, arXiv preprint 10.48550/ARXIV.2405.20732 (2024)

    2024 doi arXiv

  54. [66]

    D. J. Thouless, Quantization of particle transport, Phys. Rev. B27, 6083 (1983)

    1983

  55. [67]

    Zhang, Y.-W

    Y. Zhang, Y.-W. Tan, H. L. Stormer, and P. Kim, Ex- perimental observation of the quantum hall effect and berry’s phase in graphene, Nature438, 201–204 (2005)

    2005

  56. [68]

    J. N. Fuchs, F. Pi´ echon, M. O. Goerbig, and G. Montam- baux, Topological berry phase and semiclassical quanti- zation of cyclotron orbits for two dimensional electrons in coupled band models, The European Physical Journal B77, 351–362 (2010)

    2010

  57. [69]

    Guinea and N

    F. Guinea and N. R. Walet, Electrostatic effects, band distortions, and superconductivity in twisted graphene bilayers, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ences115, 13174–13179 (2018)

    2018

  58. [70]

    T. Cea, N. R. Walet, and F. Guinea, Electronic band structure and pinning of fermi energy to van hove sin- gularities in twisted bilayer graphene: A self-consistent approach, Physical Review B100, 10.1103/phys- revb.100.205113 (2019)

    2019 doi

  59. [71]

    P. A. Pantale´ on, T. Cea, R. Brown, N. R. Walet, and F. Guinea, Narrow bands, electrostatic interactions and band topology in graphene stacks, 2D Materials8, 044006 (2021)

    2021

  60. [72]

    M. V. Berry, Quantal Phase Factors Accompanying Adi- abatic Changes, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A. Math. Phys. Sci. 392, 45 (1984)

    1984

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.