Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Give me Some Hard Questions: Synthetic Data Generation for Clinical QA

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.04573 v1 pith:FOXU3NHW submitted 2024-12-05 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords clinicaldataquestionsfindgenerationinputpromptingquestion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Clinical Question Answering (QA) systems enable doctors to quickly access patient information from electronic health records (EHRs). However, training these systems requires significant annotated data, which is limited due to the expertise needed and the privacy concerns associated with clinical data. This paper explores generating Clinical QA data using large language models (LLMs) in a zero-shot setting. We find that naive prompting often results in easy questions that do not reflect the complexity of clinical scenarios. To address this, we propose two prompting strategies: 1) instructing the model to generate questions that do not overlap with the input context, and 2) summarizing the input record using a predefined schema to scaffold question generation. Experiments on two Clinical QA datasets demonstrate that our method generates more challenging questions, significantly improving fine-tuning performance over baselines. We compare synthetic and gold data and find a gap between their training efficacy resulting from the quality of synthetically generated answers.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Diagnosing our datasets: How does my language model learn clinical information?

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The frequency of clinical jargon in pretraining corpora predicts how well open-source LLMs interpret that jargon, but hospital notes use abbreviations that appear only rarely online.

Pith tools