Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Achieving Group Fairness through Independence in Predictive Process Monitoring

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.04914 v3 pith:CNIG2OZY submitted 2024-12-06 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords fairnessmodelspredictiveprocessgroupindependencelossmonitoring
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Predictive process monitoring focuses on forecasting future states of ongoing process executions, such as predicting the outcome of a particular case. In recent years, the application of machine learning models in this domain has garnered significant scientific attention. When using historical execution data, which may contain biases or exhibit unfair behavior, these biases may be encoded into the trained models. Consequently, when such models are deployed to make decisions or guide interventions for new cases, they risk perpetuating this unwanted behavior. This work addresses group fairness in predictive process monitoring by investigating independence, i.e. ensuring predictions are unaffected by sensitive group membership. We explore independence through metrics for demographic parity such as $\Delta$DP, as well as recently introduced, threshold-independent distribution-based alternatives. Additionally, we propose a composite loss function existing of binary cross-entropy and a distribution-based loss (Wasserstein) to train models that balance predictive performance and fairness, and allow for customizable trade-offs. The effectiveness of both the fairness metrics and the composite loss functions is validated through a controlled experimental setup.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. FairLoop: Software Support for Human-Centric Fairness in Predictive Business Process Monitoring

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    FairLoop distills predictive neural models into editable decision trees, lets users cut out unfair rules, and fine-tunes the model on corrected labels for business process monitoring.

  2. T2I-ReasonBench: Benchmarking Reasoning-Informed Text-to-Image Generation

    cs.CV 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    The abstract and body of this submission are mismatched: the claimed T2I reasoning benchmark never appears in the body, which is an unrelated paper on fairness in predictive process monitoring.

Pith tools