Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 54 references

Obliquely interacting solitary waves and wave wakes in free-surface flows

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Whitham modulation theory for the isotropic Benney–Luke equation yields analytic formulas for Mach reflection and Mach expansion of solitary waves, and predicts circular rather than parabolic wave wakes, all confirmed by direct numerical…

desk verdict A genuine first Whitham theory for the BL equation, but the printed modulation equations contain a reciprocal factor error that undermines the Mach reflection predictions as written. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.05034 v1 pith:XHGPH2T3 submitted 2024-12-06 nlin.PS physics.flu-dyn

Lei Hu , Xudan Luo , Zhan Wang This is my paper · ORCID
classification nlin.PSphysics.flu-dyn MSC 76B1576B2535Q5335Q51 PACS 47.35.Fg47.35.-i
keywords Benney-LukeequationWhithammodulationtheoryMachreflectionexpansionsolitarywavesRankine-Hugoniotconditionsforcedwavewakes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper develops a Whitham modulation theory for the Benney–Luke (BL) equation, an isotropic and bi-directional model of shallow-water waves, and uses it to predict how obliquely colliding solitary waves interact. The theory produces analytical formulas for the critical angle that separates Mach reflection from regular reflection and for the amplitude of the Mach stem that forms in the resonant case; direct numerical solutions of the BL equation reproduce these predictions. Applied to the forced BL equation, the same modulation equations yield a similarity solution describing waves generated by moving topography, whose far-field wavefronts are circular arcs rather than the parabolic fronts of the forced Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equation. The results matter because they show that quantitative soliton-interaction predictions need not be tied to a unidirectional, anisotropic model, and they expose a concrete observable difference between isotropic and anisotropic descriptions of shallow-water wakes.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Whitham modulation system (3.10) for the BL equation, derived from the phase compatibility conditions (3.5) and the solvability condition at next-to-leading order. For soliton dynamics the system simplifies to the $2\times 2$ hyperbolic system (4.2) whose Riemann invariants (4.4) and characteristic speeds (4.3) produce the rarefaction solutions describing Mach expansion. For discontinuous transitions, the analysis uses the modified Rankine–Hugoniot conditions (5.4) from the full conservation form (5.2) together with classical Rankine–Hugoniot conditions (5.7) from a decomposition of (3.10c) into two one-dimensional conservation laws. The wave-wake description rests on a similarity solution of the modulation equations under the assumption $k=1$ and $a$ independent of $y$, which gives the circular wavefronts in formula (6.2).

What would settle it

Directly solve the full BL equation for a reverse bent soliton with $a_0=0.21$ over a fine sweep of initial angles near the predicted critical angle from (5.10), extract the Mach stem amplitude and the triple-point velocity, and compare them to the solution of (5.4) and (5.7): a systematic deviation beyond numerical error would falsify the classical Rankine–Hugoniot part of the prediction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the modulation equations (3.10c,d) for the BL equation, supplemented by the modified Rankine–Hugoniot conditions (5.4) and the classical Rankine–Hugoniot conditions (5.7) obtained by decomposing (3.10c) into two one-dimensional conservation laws, determine the Mach stem and reflected soliton amplitudes and the critical angles for Mach expansion and Mach reflection. For bent solitons with initial slope $q_0<0$, rarefaction-wave solutions give a Mach stem of amplitude fixed by the integral relation (4.8) and a critical angle $\theta_{cr}$ given by (4.13); for reverse bent solitons $q_0>0$, the algebraic system yields stem and reflected amplitudes $(a_w,q_w)$ and $(a_i,q_i)$ that agree with direct numerical simulations of the BL equation. As the soliton speed approaches unity, the BL predictions converge to those of the KP equation, while for larger speeds the two models diverge. For the forced BL equation, a slowly varying similarity solution of the same modulation equations describes far-field waves as circular arcs, matching numerical simulations for subcritical, critical, and supercritical topography speeds, with the subcritical wake angle given by formula (6.8).

Load-bearing premise

The Mach-reflection predictions stand on the unproved claim that equation (3.10c) can be split into two independent one-dimensional conservation laws by alternately neglecting the $x$- and $y$-derivatives; if that split is invalid, the algebraic system for the Mach stem and reflected soliton amplitudes becomes underdetermined.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Given an incident soliton amplitude and speed, formulas (4.13), (4.20), (5.9), and (5.10) tell whether a Mach stem will form and how tall it will be, so laboratory or field observations of solitary-wave collisions can be checked against these quantitative thresholds.
  • At speeds close to the shallow-water wave speed, the BL and KP equations agree on critical angles and stem speeds, meaning the simpler unidirectional KP model remains reliable near resonance, while away from it the isotropic BL description is the better guide.
  • For moving topography at subcritical speeds, the far-field wavefront is a circle of radius roughly $t$ centered on the starting point; at critical speeds the first precursor front stays approximately circular but is pushed ahead of that circle by the moving topography.
  • Supercritical topography produces no upstream precursor and confines the wake to an angle $\arcsin(1/c_b)$, a qualitative change from the subcritical regime where the wake angle spans 0 to 90 degrees as $c_b$ approaches 1.
  • Two co-moving topographies can generate a Mach stem where their wakes meet, with the stem appearing only for sufficiently large topography amplitude, low enough speed, and separation below about 1000; these conditions remain partly empirical in the paper.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The decomposition of (3.10c) into two one-dimensional conservation laws is an ansatz; a rigorous two-dimensional shock theory would be needed to confirm the classical Rankine–Hugoniot predictions beyond the parameter ranges tested numerically.
  • The circular-versus-parabolic far-field wavefront is an observable signature that could be tested in a shallow-water tank: a subcritical towed obstacle should show circular precursor crests, whereas the forced KP picture predicts parabolic crests.
  • Because internal-wave versions of the BL equation share the same structure with modified coefficients, the authors' modulation framework could transfer to stratified flows, potentially yielding the same circular-wavefront prediction for internal wave wakes.
  • The wake-interaction Mach stem threshold (amplitude, speed, separation) seems plausibly mappable onto the single-soliton critical-angle formula, which would turn the empirical parameter scans in section 6.3 into a quantitative prediction.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a Whitham modulation theory for the two-dimensional Benney–Luke equation and uses it to analyze Mach expansion and Mach reflection of obliquely interacting line solitons, deriving critical angles and Mach-stem amplitudes that are compared with direct numerical simulations of the BL equation and with the KP equation. The paper also treats the forced BL equation for topography-generated waves and claims that the far-field precursor wavefronts are circular, in contrast to the parabolic wavefronts of the forced KP equation.

Significance. If the modulation system and its downstream predictions are correct, the paper would provide a useful isotropic, bidirectional counterpart to the well-developed KP modulation theory for soliton interactions, with explicit formulas for critical slopes and amplitudes and with direct BL numerics supporting the predictions. The paper is self-contained in the sense that no free parameters are fitted to the numerical solutions, the derivations are presented in detail, and the comparison with the KP limit near unit speed is a valuable check. However, the central modulation system contains a factor inconsistency that propagates into most of the analytical results, and the reduced Rankine–Hugoniot construction in Section 5 relies on an unproved decomposition. These issues make the analytical claims, as printed, unsupported by the derivation.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3, Eqs. (3.10b,c) and Appendix A (A19)–(A20)] The fluxes in (3.10b,c) are sqrt(1+q^2)/sqrt(1+a), but the dispersion relation (3.8), omega = -k sqrt(1+a) sqrt(1+q^2) for left-going waves, together with the compatibility conditions (3.5), yields k_t - (kB)_x = 0 and q_t + q B_x - q_x B - B_y = 0 with B = sqrt(1+a) sqrt(1+q^2). This is exactly what Appendix A states in (A19)–(A20). The printed (3.10b,c) therefore contain a reciprocal factor (1+a). Because (3.10c) feeds into the characteristic speeds (4.3), the Riemann invariants (4.4), the Mach expansion formulas (4.8) and (4.20), and the Rankine–Hugoniot system (5.4)–(5.7), the analytical predictions in Sections 4 and 5 are not supported by the printed equations. Moreover, the reduced 1D system (4.2) is not consistent with either version of (3.10c): using B' gives a_y coefficient +sqrt(1+q^2)/(2(1+a)^{3/2}), whereas using B gives q_y coefficient sqrt(1+a) q/sqrt(1+q^2). The manuscript must be corrected and the numerical comparisons re-verified against the corrected system.
  2. [§5.1, Eqs. (5.5)–(5.7)] The decomposition of (3.10c) into two independent one-dimensional conservation laws (5.5) by 'alternately neglecting the x- and y-directions' is asserted without a derivation or a controlled asymptotic justification. This step is load-bearing because the classical Rankine–Hugoniot conditions (5.7) obtained from it determine the Mach stem amplitude a_w and the reflected amplitude a_i. In addition, the quantity F^(1)=1/q in (5.6) is singular at the Mach stem value q_w=0, so the first equality in (5.7) is undefined as written and no limiting procedure is stated. Even if the decomposition were accepted, the factor error in (3.10c) changes the fluxes in (5.6) and hence the algebraic system that produces a_w≈0.478149 and a_i≈0.0568022.
  3. [§6.1–6.2, Eq. (6.2)] The circular similarity solution (6.2) is introduced with the assumptions 'k = 1 and a independent of y', but no derivation is given and the stated relation a = f^2/t - 1 does not appear to satisfy the modulation equations (4.2) for general f(t); for example, with f(t)=t the first equation of (4.2) is not satisfied identically. Since the circular (rather than parabolic) shape of the precursor wavefronts is a central claim of the paper, the far-field reduction should either be derived carefully from the corrected modulation system or explicitly presented as a numerically motivated ansatz with its range of validity stated.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§4.3, Eq. (4.20)] The expansion variable eps = -omega_0 - 1 is introduced in (4.20) and (5.10) using the symbol eps, which is already used for the small parameter in the multiple-scales rescaling (3.2); please use a distinct symbol to avoid confusion.
  2. [Figures 10 and 13] The captions refer to 'black dashed lines' for the linear wake-angle predictions, while the figures show black dotted lines; please unify the terminology.
  3. [§2.1, Eq. (2.3)] The reduction from the fBL equation (2.1) to the fKP equation (2.3)–(2.4) appears to have a coefficient in the nonlinear term (3/2 versus the standard value after the rescaling (2.5)) that is not explained; please check the derivation and state the scaling conventions explicitly.
  4. [§5.3, Eq. (5.13)] The phase parameters kappa_1, kappa_2, kappa_3 are used to express the KP soliton amplitudes and slopes, but their normalization relative to the line soliton solution (2.9) is not defined; please add the precise definition or a reference.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: predictions are derived, not fitted; internal factor inconsistency is a correctness issue, not circularity.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The modulation system (3.10) is obtained from the BL equation through the multiple-scales solvability argument in Section 3 and Appendix A, and the Mach-expansion, Mach-reflection, and wake predictions are algebraic outputs of that system: the Riemann invariants (4.4)-(4.8), the Rankine-Hugoniot conditions (5.4)-(5.7), and the similarity reduction (6.2)-(6.3). No parameter appearing in these predictions is fitted to the direct numerical BL simulations; the initial data (a0, q0, omega0) are inputs, and aw, ai, qcr, and the circular radius t are computed from the equations. The agreement in Figures 3, 7, 10, and 11 is therefore genuine external validation rather than a restatement of inputs. The paper does cite prior work by one of its authors (Yuan et al. 2020; Yuan & Wang 2022) for the BL/fBL model and for the windowing numerical method, but these citations support model provenance and numerical technique, not the target predictions, so they are not load-bearing. One caveat that is a correctness rather than circularity concern: equations (3.10b,c) in the main text use fluxes sqrt(1+q^2)/sqrt(1+a), whereas Appendix A's reduction (A19)-(A20) gives sqrt(1+a)/sqrt(1+q^2), i.e., a reciprocal (1+a) factor; if confirmed, this would affect the printed RH-based predictions, but it would be an algebraic inconsistency, not a re-insertion of the target values as inputs. Overall, no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data; the input parameters (a0, theta0, omega0, b0, cb) are initial conditions and forcing parameters. The main nonstandard assumptions are the soliton-limit reduction of the cnoidal wave family, the ad-hoc decomposition of the consistency equation in section 5.1, and the far-field ansatz k=1, a_y=0 in section 6.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The BL equation (1.6) is a valid weakly nonlinear model for free-surface and internal shallow-water waves, with epsilon = O(mu^2).
    Invoked in section 1 and section 2.1 as the starting model; if the model itself fails for the target oceanic scales, all conclusions inherit that failure.
  • domain assumption The wave field is a slowly modulated kink/cnoidal wave with phase eta satisfying eta_X = k/epsilon, eta_Y = l/epsilon, eta_T = -omega/epsilon in (3.4).
    Used throughout section 3 and Appendix A; standard in Whitham theory but not rigorously justified for the BL equation.
  • domain assumption At next-to-leading order, the Fredholm solvability condition (orthogonality to the neutral mode) is sufficient to close the modulation system; higher-order terms do not affect the soliton dynamics at the stated order.
    Used to obtain (3.9) and (A.14); no error estimate is provided.
  • domain assumption The limit m -> 1 of the cnoidal wave family gives the line-soliton dynamics, and the resulting modulation equations (3.10) remain valid for the interaction phenomena studied in sections 4 and 5.
    Stated in Appendix A around (A.18); the paper does not justify why the zero-amplitude periodic limit captures all relevant soliton interactions, especially at the triple point.
  • ad hoc to paper Equation (3.10c) can be split into two independent one-dimensional conservation laws (5.5) by alternately neglecting x- and y-derivative terms.
    Introduced without derivation in section 5.1; it is load-bearing for the classical Rankine-Hugoniot conditions (5.7) and for solving for a_w and a_i.
  • ad hoc to paper For the moving-topography far field, the modulation solution has k = 1 and a independent of y, giving the circular similarity solution (6.2).
    Assumed in section 6 before equation (6.2); the circular shape is only valid within this ansatz.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Obliquely interacting solitary waves and wave wakes in free-surface flows." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XHGPH2T3

@misc{pith2026241205034,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Obliquely interacting solitary waves and wave wakes in free-surface flows},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XHGPH2T3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.05034}
}
read the original abstract

This paper investigates the weakly nonlinear isotropic bi-directional Benney--Luke (BL) equation, which is used to describe oceanic surface and internal waves in shallow water, with a particular focus on soliton dynamics. Using the Whitham modulation theory, we derive the modulation equations associated with the BL equation that describe the evolution of soliton amplitude and slope. By analyzing rarefaction waves and shock waves within these modulation equations, we derive the Riemann invariants and modified Rankine--Hugoniot conditions. These expressions help characterize the Mach expansion and Mach reflection phenomena of bent and reverse bent solitons. We also derive analytical formulas for the critical angle and the Mach stem amplitude, showing that as the soliton speed is in the vicinity of unity, the results from the BL equation align closely with those of the Kadomtsev--Petviashvili (KP) equation. Corresponding numerical results are obtained and show excellent agreement with theoretical predictions. Furthermore, as a far-field approximation for the forced BL equation -- which models wave and flow interactions with local topography -- the modulation equations yield a slowly varying similarity solution. This solution indicates that the precursor wavefronts created by topography moving at subcritical or critical speeds take the shape of a circular arc, in contrast to the parabolic wavefronts observed in the forced KP equation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.05034 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Diagram of a shock wave encounters the compressive corner (a,b) and expansive [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Time evolution of the bent-stem soliton initial data ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a)–(b) evolutions of the amplitude 𝑎 and slope 𝑞 for the bent soliton initial data (4.1) with 𝜃0 = −15◦ and 𝑎0 = 0.21 at different times. They are obtained from the numerical simulations for the BL equation (1.6) (dark solid curves) and the modulation equations (4.2) (red dashed curves). (c) space-time contour plots of the amplitude of the Mach stem with the same initial data, where the blue dashed lines and black … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Time evolution of the bent-stem soliton initial data ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparative plot of the wall reduction factor (a) and the speed (b) of the Mach [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Snapshot during the evolution of the bent-stem soliton initial data ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) evolutions of the amplitude 𝑎 for the bent soliton initial data (4.1) with 𝜃0 = 20◦ and 𝑎0 = 0.21 at 𝑡 = 600. They are obtained from the direct numerical simulations of the BL equation (1.6) (dark solid curves) and the theoretical prediction based on the algebraic …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Time evolution of the bent-stem soliton initial data ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The same as figure 5 except that 𝜃0 > 0 for the Mach reflection of the line solitons. where the initial angle 𝜃0 > 0, thus focusing on the Mach reflection of line solitons. In figure 9a, the wall reduce factor 𝜆 of the BL equation is consistently greater than that of t…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Evolution of the wave generated by the moving topography with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Evolution of the wave generated by the moving topography with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Evolution of the first precursor wave with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Evolution of the wave generated by the moving topography with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Evolution of the wave generated by the moving topography ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: (a1, b1, c1) evolution of the wave generated by the moving topography ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_15.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ablowitz, M. J. & Baldwin, D. E. 2012 Nonlinear shallow ocean-wave soliton interactions on flat beaches . Phys. Rev. E 86 (3), 036305

    work page 2012

  2. [2]

    Ablowitz, M. J. , Biondini, G. & Wang, Q. 2017 Whitham modulation theory for the Kadomtsev--Petviashvili equation . Proc. R. Soc. A 473 (2204), 20160695

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Ablowitz, M. J. & Clarkson, P. A. 1991 Solitons, Nonlinear Evolution Equations and Inverse Scattering\/ . London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series 149. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press

    work page 1991

  4. [4]

    Ablowitz, M. J. & Curtis, C. W. 2011 On the evolution of perturbations to solutions of the Kadomtsev--Petviashvilli equation using the Benney--Luke equation . J. Phys. A 44 (19), 195202

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    Ablowitz, M. J. & Curtis, C. W. 2013 Conservation laws and non-decaying solutions for the Benney--Luke equation . Proc. R. Soc. A 469 (2152), 20120690

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    Ablowitz, M. J. , Fokas, A. S. & Musslimani, Z. H. 2006 On a new non-local formulation of water waves . J. Fluid Mech. 562 , 313

    work page 2006

  7. [7]

    Bazhenova, T. V. , Gvozdeva, L. G. , Komarov, V. S. & Sukhov, B. G. 1975 Diffraction of strong shock waves by convex corners . Fluid Dynam. 8 (4), 611--619

    work page 1975

  8. [8]

    Benney, D. J. & Luke, J. C. 1964 On the interactions of permanent waves of finite amplitude . J. Math. Phys. 43 (1-4), 309--313

    work page 1964

Show all 54 references
  1. [9]

    2007 Line soliton interactions of the Kadomtsev--Petviashvili equation

    Biondini, G. 2007 Line soliton interactions of the Kadomtsev--Petviashvili equation . Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (6), 064103

    2007

  2. [10]

    & Chakravarty, S

    Biondini, G. & Chakravarty, S. 2006 Soliton solutions of the Kadomtsev--Petviashvili II equation . Journal of Mathematical Physics 47 (3), 033514

    2006

  3. [11]

    , Hoefer, M

    Biondini, G. , Hoefer, M. A. & Moro, A. 2020 Integrability, exact reductions and special solutions of the KP--Whitham equations . Nonlinearity 33 (8), 4114--4132

    2020

  4. [12]

    , Maruno, K.-I

    Biondini, G. , Maruno, K.-I. , Oikawa, M. & Tsuji, H. 2009 Soliton interactions of the Kadomtsev--Petviashvili equation and generation of large-amplitude water waves . Stud. Appl. Math. 122 (4), 377--394

    2009

  5. [13]

    & Kalogirou, A

    Bokhove, O. & Kalogirou, A. 2016 Variational water wave modelling: from continuum to experiment . In Lectures on the Theory of Water Waves , 1st edn. (ed. Bridges, T. J., Groves, M. D. & Nicholls, D. P. ) , pp. 226--260 . Cambridge University Press

    2016

  6. [14]

    Byrd, P. F. & Friedman, M. D. 2013 Handbook of Elliptic Integrals for Engineers and Scientists\/ , 2nd edn. Berlin, Germany: Springer

    2013

  7. [15]

    1910 Waves of the Sea and Other Water Waves\/

    Cornish, V. 1910 Waves of the Sea and Other Water Waves\/ . London, T. Fisher Unwin

    1910

  8. [16]

    Curtis, C. W. and Shen, S. S. P. 2015 Three-dimensional surface water waves governed by the forced Benney--Luke equation . Stud. Appl. Math. 135 (4), 447--465

    2015

  9. [17]

    1980 Reflection of obliquely incident solitary waves

    Funakoshi, M. 1980 Reflection of obliquely incident solitary waves . J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 49 (6), 2371--2379

    1980

  10. [18]

    , Bokhove, O

    Gidel, F. , Bokhove, O. & Kalogirou, A. 2017 Variational modelling of extreme waves through oblique interaction of solitary waves: Application to Mach reflection . Nonlinear Proc. Geoph. 24 (1), 43--60

    2017

  11. [19]

    Gilmore, F. R. , Plesset, M. S. & Crossley, H. E. 1950 The analogy between hydraulic jumps in liquids and shock waves in gases . J. Appl. Phys. 21 (3), 243--249

    1950

  12. [20]

    , Klein, C

    Grava, T. , Klein, C. & Pitton, G. 2018 Numerical study of the Kadomtsev--Petviashvili equation and dispersive shock waves . Proc. Roy. Soc. A 474 (2210), 20170458

    2018

  13. [21]

    Kadomtsev, B. B. & Petviashvili, V. I. 1970 On the stability of solitary waves in weakly dispersing media . Sov. Phys. Dokl. 15 , 539--541

    1970

  14. [22]

    & Kodama, Y

    Kao, C.-Y. & Kodama, Y. 2012 Numerical study of the KP equation for non-periodic waves . Math. Comput. Simulat. 82 (7), 1185--1218

    2012

  15. [23]

    and Akylas, T

    Katsis, C. and Akylas, T. R. 1987 On the excitation of long nonlinear water waves by a moving pressure distribution. Part 2. Three-dimensional effects . J. Fluid Mech. 177 , 49--65

    1987

  16. [24]

    2004 Young diagrams and N -soliton solutions of the KP equation

    Kodama, Y. 2004 Young diagrams and N -soliton solutions of the KP equation . J. Phys. A 37 (46), 11169--11190

    2004

  17. [25]

    2010 KP solitons in shallow water

    Kodama, Y. 2010 KP solitons in shallow water . J. Phys. A 43 (43), 434004

    2010

  18. [26]

    2018 Solitons in Two-Dimensional Shallow Water\/

    Kodama, Y. 2018 Solitons in Two-Dimensional Shallow Water\/ . Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics

    2018

  19. [27]

    , Oikawa, M

    Kodama, Y. , Oikawa, M. & Tsuji, H. 2009 Soliton solutions of the KP equation with V-shape initial waves . J. Phys. A 42 (31), 312001

    2009

  20. [28]

    & Yeh, H

    Kodama, Y. & Yeh, H. 2016 The KP theory and Mach reflection . J. Fluid Mech. 800 , 766--786

    2016

  21. [29]

    & van der Geest, M

    Krehl, P. & van der Geest, M. 1991 The discovery of the Mach reflection effect and its demonstration in an auditorium . Shock Waves 1 (1), 3--15

    1991

  22. [30]

    & Grimshaw, R

    Lee, S.-J. & Grimshaw, R. H. J. 1990 Upstream-advancing waves generated by three-dimensional moving disturbances . Phys. Fluids 2 (2), 194--201

    1990

  23. [31]

    , Yates, G

    Lee, S.-J. , Yates, G. T. & Wu, T. Y. 1989 Experiments and analyses of upstream-advancing solitary waves generated by moving disturbances . J. Fluid Mech. 199 , 569--593

    1989

  24. [32]

    , Yeh, H

    Li, W. , Yeh, H. & Kodama, Y. 2011 On the Mach reflection of a solitary wave: Revisited . J. Fluid Mech. 672 , 326--357

    2011

  25. [33]

    & Wosyka, J

    Mach, E. & Wosyka, J. 1875 Ueber einige mechanische Wirkungen des elektrischen Funkens . Ann. Phys. - Berlin 232 (11), 407--416

  26. [34]

    Melville, W. K. 1980 On the Mach reflexion of a solitary wave . J. Fluid Mech. 98 (2), 285--297

    1980

  27. [35]

    Miles, J. W. 1977 a\/ Obliquely interacting solitary waves . J. Fluid Mech. 79 (1), 157--169

    1977

  28. [36]

    Miles, J. W. 1977 b\/ Resonantly interacting solitary waves . J. Fluid Mech. 79 (1), 171--179

    1977

  29. [37]

    Milewski, P. A. 1998 A formulation for water waves over topography . Stud. Appl. Math. 100 (1), 95--106

    1998

  30. [38]

    Milewski, P. A. and Tabak, E. G. 1999 A pseudospectral procedure for the solution of nonlinear wave equations with examples from free-surface flows . SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 21 (3), 1102--1114

    1999

  31. [39]

    Neu, J. C. 2015 Singular Perturbation in the Physical Sciences\/ . Graduate Studies in Mathematics\/ volume 167. Providence, Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society

    2015

  32. [40]

    Perroud, P. H. 1957 The solitary wave reflection along a straight vertical wall at oblique incidence . PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley

    1957

  33. [41]

    1983 Contributions of Ernst Mach to fluid mechanics

    Reichenbach, H. 1983 Contributions of Ernst Mach to fluid mechanics . Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 15 (1), 1--29

    1983

  34. [42]

    , Maiden, M

    Ryskamp, S. , Maiden, M. D. , Biondini, G. & Hoefer, M. A. 2021 Evolution of truncated and bent gravity wave solitons: The Mach expansion problem . J. Fluid Mech. 909 , A24

    2021

  35. [43]

    Ryskamp, S. J. , Hoefer, M. A. & Biondini, G. 2022 Modulation theory for soliton resonance and Mach reflection . Proc. Roy. Soc. A 478 (2259), 20210823

    2022

  36. [44]

    , Adams, N

    Schlatter, P. , Adams, N. A. & Kleiser, L. 2005 A windowing method for periodic inflow/outflow boundary treatment of non-periodic flows . J. Comput. Phys. 206 (2), 505--535

    2005

  37. [45]

    1998 Essentially non-oscillatory and weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws

    Shu, C.-W. 1998 Essentially non-oscillatory and weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws . In Advanced Numerical Approximation of Nonlinear Hyperbolic Equations\/ (ed. Cockburn, B., Shu, C.-W., Johnson, C., Tadmor, E. & Quarteroni, A. ) , p...

    1998

  38. [46]

    1993 Mach reflection of a large-amplitude solitary wave

    Tanaka, M. 1993 Mach reflection of a large-amplitude solitary wave . J. Fluid Mech. 248 , 637--661

    1993

  39. [47]

    and Oikawa, M

    Tsuji, H. and Oikawa, M. 2007 Oblique interaction of solitons in an extended Kadomtsev--Petviashvili equation . J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 76 (8), 084401

    2007

  40. [48]

    & Pawlowicz, R

    Wang, C. & Pawlowicz, R. 2012 Oblique wave-wave interactions of nonlinear near-surface internal waves in the Strait of Georgia . J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 117 (C6), 2012JC008022

    2012

  41. [49]

    Whitham, G. B. 1957 A new approach to problems of shock dynamics Part I Two-dimensional problems . J. Fluid Mech. 2 (2), 145--171

    1957

  42. [50]

    Whitham, G. B. 1959 A new approach to problems of shock dynamics Part 2. Three-dimensional problems . J. Fluid Mech. 5 (3), 369--386

    1959

  43. [51]

    Whitham, G. B. 1999 Linear and Nonlinear Waves\/ . Pure and Applied Mathematics\/ 1237. New York Chichester Weinheim: Wiley

    1999

  44. [52]

    , Grimshaw, R

    Yuan, C. , Grimshaw, R. H. J. , Johnson, E. & Chen, X. 2018 The propagation of internal solitary waves over variable topography in a horizontally two-dimensional framework . J. Phys. Oceanogr. 48 (2), 283--300

    2018

  45. [53]

    & Wang, Z

    Yuan, C. & Wang, Z. 2022 On diffraction and oblique interactions of horizontally two-dimensional internal solitary waves . J. Fluid Mech. 936 , A20

    2022

  46. [54]

    , Wang, Z

    Yuan, C. , Wang, Z. & Chen, X. 2020 The derivation of an isotropic model for internal waves and its application to wave generation . Ocean Model. 153 , 101663

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.