Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Efficient Storage of Multidimensional Telecom Photons in a Solid-State Quantum Memory

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Telecom photons stored in three qubit bases at 92% fidelity.

desk verdict Useful efficiency scheme and solid polarization tomography, but the frequency- and time-bin 'qubit storage' claims outrun the data. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.05480 v1 pith:OSOFUSW7 submitted 2024-12-07 quant-ph

Zongfeng Li , Yisheng Lei , Trevor Kling , Mahdi Hosseini This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords quantummemoryatomicfrequencycomberbium-dopedcrystaltelecomphotonsmultidimensionalqubitsinterleavedpumpingprocesstomographytime-binqubit
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports a quantum memory for telecom-band light that stores single-photon-level pulses in three photonic encodings—polarization, frequency, and time-bin—simultaneously or separately. The memory is an atomic frequency comb in an erbium-167 doped YSO crystal operated at 0.9 K and 1.1 T, conditions reached with a table-top cryostat and permanent magnets rather than a dilution refrigerator or superconducting magnet. The main new mechanism is an interleaved spectral-hole pumping scheme that periodically interrupts the pump to let excited atoms decay into shelving states, boosting storage efficiency by over an order of magnitude compared to previous low-field erbium memories. Polarization qubits are verified with quantum process tomography showing fidelity above 92%; frequency and time-bin storage are shown at the single-photon level, with frequency fidelity estimated from classical intensity ratios. If these results hold, practical telecom quantum memories and multiplexed quantum repeaters become more accessible.

What carries the argument

The central object is the interleaved optical pumping sequence used to prepare atomic frequency combs in erbium: a batch of complex hyperbolic secant pulses that sweep over the target frequency window to shelve atoms into long-lived hyperfine states, followed by a 10 ms in-loop delay during which the pump is off so that excited atoms can decay into the shelving states rather than being stimulated back. Repeated cycles create deep, narrow spectral holes. This scheme is what raises the comb finesse and lowers background absorption, making the storage efficiency of the AFC memory practical at 0.9 K and 1.1 T. The AFC itself—a periodic series of absorption peaks spaced by 1–2 MHz—carries the storage and re-emission: an absorbed photon is collectively re-emitted as an echo after a time set by the comb spacing, giving a memory with a controllable delay in the 0.5–1 µs range demonstrated here.

What would settle it

A decisive test would be storing a time-bin superposition state (for example one photon in (|early⟩+|late⟩)/√2) and measuring the interference visibility of the retrieved echo after a variable relative phase; a visibility below the classical limit, or a nonzero complex phase in time-bin quantum process tomography, would show the memory is not storing time-bin qubits coherently.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that an AFC memory in 167Er3+:YSO can be initialized efficiently under mild conditions and can store telecom photonic qubits in multiple degrees of freedom. Using interleaved pumping with complex hyperbolic secant pulses and a 10 ms in-loop delay, the authors create AFC combs with finesse F≈3 and background absorption d0≈1.3, achieving up to 6.1% storage efficiency for classical pulses and 5.0% for single-photon pulses—an 8-fold improvement over continuous pumping and more than an order of magnitude over prior low-field work. Quantum process tomography on polarization qubits yields process fidelities of 92.3% and 95.5% for two time-bin echoes at the single-photon level. Two spectrally separated AFC windows allow frequency-dependent delay, and the paper reports FIFO and FILO reordering of time-bin pulses. The central claim is therefore that multidimensional telecom qubit storage and efficient initialization are possible without extreme magnetic fields or millikelvin temperatures.

Load-bearing premise

The claim that frequency and time-bin storage are quantum qubit storage assumes that those encodings remain coherent through the memory; the paper estimates frequency fidelity from a classical intensity ratio (setting β=0) and does not measure time-bin fidelity, so if either encoding loses phase coherence the demonstration reduces to classical pulse delay.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the interleaved pumping scheme proves general, erbium-based telecom memories can operate with table-top permanent magnets and a 0.9 K cryostat rather than a dilution refrigerator, lowering the barrier to practical deployment.
  • The demonstrated simultaneous storage of two pulses in distinct frequency windows enables frequency-dependent delay and first-in-first-out or first-in-last-out reordering, which can serve as a coherent pulse processor for quantum repeaters.
  • With an extended ground-state lifetime (for example via spin-polarization initialization), the paper projects storage efficiency exceeding 30% under the same field and temperature.
  • Storing polarization, frequency, and time-bin degrees of freedom in one crystal provides building blocks for multiplexed quantum memories and entanglement distribution over telecom fibers.
  • Process fidelity above 92% for polarization qubits at the single-photon level indicates compatibility with quantum-repeater protocols that require high-fidelity storage and retrieval.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's "multidimensional qubit storage" claim currently rests mainly on polarization tomography; until time-bin and frequency-bin coherence are verified with quantum interference or full state tomography, the storage of those encodings should be read as classical-level demonstrations.
  • If the interleaved pumping principle transfers to other long-lived excited-state ion platforms (for example europium or praseodymium), it could become a standard initialization tool for AFC memories beyond erbium.
  • A direct extension of this work would be a time-bin two-photon interference experiment: store a photon in a superposition of two time bins and check that the interference visibility after retrieval exceeds the classical bound, which would certify genuine time-bin qubit storage.
  • The efficiency formula used in the paper suggests that further reducing background absorption d0 while keeping finesse F high could push efficiency to tens of percent; a systematic d0–F optimization using the interleaved pump would test that scaling.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports an atomic-frequency-comb (AFC) optical memory in isotopically purified 167Er3+:YSO operated at 0.9 K and 1.1 T generated by permanent magnets, using an 'interleaved pumping' scheme (periodic ~10 ms pump interruptions) for spectral tailoring. The authors report classical and single-photon-level storage efficiencies of 6.1% and 5.0%, an ~8-fold improvement over their continuous-pumping baseline, and consistent with the standard AFC efficiency formula (predicted ~7.5% from independently measured OD ≈ 3.3, finesse ≈ 3, and background absorption OD ≈ 1.3). They demonstrate polarization-qubit storage with quantum process tomography (single-photon-level process fidelities 92.3% and 95.5% for two time bins) and demonstrate storage of frequency- and time-bin-encoded pulses at the single-photon level, including FIFO/FILO reordering via frequency-dependent delays, with crosstalk-based fidelity estimates of 99.7% and 97.2% for the frequency windows. The paper claims 'multidimensional qubit storage' in polarization, frequency, and time-bin bases.

Significance. If the results hold, the practical advances are real: an erbium AFC memory operating at 0.9 K and 1.1 T with table-top permanent magnets rather than a dilution refrigerator and superconducting magnet, and an interleaved pumping scheme giving an in-experiment ~8-fold efficiency gain over continuous pumping. A genuine strength is the efficiency consistency check: Eq. (1) is the standard AFC expression, evaluated with separately measured parameters (OD, finesse, background absorption) to predict 7.5% versus a measured 6%, so the agreement is a legitimate test rather than a fit. The polarization quantum process tomography (92.3% and 95.5% at the single-photon level) is a correctly executed certification of one degree of freedom, and the stated claims are falsifiable (e.g., the projected >30% efficiency with extended ground-state lifetimes). The paper's current significance rests mainly on the efficiency and practicality improvements and on the polarization-qubit demonstration; the multidimensional-qubit claim, if substantiated, would raise the impact considerably, but as presented it exceeds the evidence.

major comments (3)
  1. [S.I. Sec. C; Section III.B; Fig. 3] The frequency-bin fidelity estimate in S.I. Sec. C, F_alpha = alpha'/(alpha'+beta'), is evaluated with beta = 0, i.e., with a single-frequency input pulse, so it measures only the classical population (crosstalk) ratio between the two AFC windows. This quantity is independent of the relative phase between the two frequency modes and therefore cannot certify that a superposition alpha|0>_f + beta|1>_f remains coherent through storage and retrieval. The Fig. 3 demonstrations are mode-selective delays and reordering of pulses launched into separate windows, which is classical pulse routing. To support the abstract's claim of storing qubits in the frequency basis, the authors should either present a phase-sensitive characterization (for example, quantum process tomography in the frequency basis or an interference-fringe visibility measurement on a retrieved superposition) or revise the claim to 'storage of frequency-encoded pulses.'
  2. [Section III.B; Fig. 3] The experiments described in Section III.B and Fig. 3 store individual pulses in two successive time bins at two different carrier frequencies and reorder them through frequency-dependent AFC delays (FIFO/FILO). This demonstrates storage and reordering of time-encoded pulses, but it does not test the defining property of a time-bin qubit: the coherence of a superposition alpha|early> + beta|late> in a single spectral mode. No unbalanced-interferometer measurement or equivalent phase-sensitive test appears in the main text or the S.I., so the claim of 'time-bin qubit storage' is unsupported by the presented data. The authors should add such a measurement or state explicitly that only storage of time-encoded pulses (classical delays) was demonstrated.
  3. [Abstract; Section V] The abstract and the conclusion assert storage of photonic qubits in polarization, frequency, and time-bin bases, with quantum process tomography 'achieving a fidelity exceeding 92%.' As Section III.C makes clear, the QPT and the 92-96% fidelities apply only to the polarization degree of freedom; for the frequency and time-bin encodings the Introduction itself (Section I) states that fidelity was evaluated by 'intensity noise estimation.' The headline claims therefore overstate the demonstrated capabilities. The manuscript should either add the missing coherence measurements for the frequency and time-bin degrees of freedom or rescale the central claims to match what was measured: high-fidelity polarization-qubit storage plus classical-level crosstalk and pulse-routing demonstrations for the other two encodings.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section II] Section II contains a corrupted passage — 'consist of 8 and 4I15/26 Krathemers doublets, respectively, and then7. These doublets become Applying a strong magnetic field ...' — which must be repaired to restore the intended statement about the Kramers doublets of the 4I15/2 and 4I13/2 multiplets, and the typo 'Krathemers' should be corrected to 'Kramers.'
  2. [Abstract; Section III.A] The abstract says the interleaved scheme 'improves storage efficiency by over an order of magnitude,' but Section III.A reports a factor of about 8 relative to continuous pumping in this work; the order-of-magnitude statement refers to comparison with Ref. [43]. The baseline for the abstract claim should be stated explicitly, and the cross-platform comparison with Ref. [43] (a nanophotonic device) should be discussed with its caveats.
  3. [Section III.A; S.I. Fig. S1(c)] The optical coherence time is reported as T2 = 169 µs in the main text but as 'T2 = 169 ms' in the caption of S.I. Fig. S1(c); these values are inconsistent and must be reconciled with the correct measured value and its uncertainty.
  4. [S.I. Secs. C and E] The S.I. contains unfilled citation placeholders — '[ ? ]' in Sec. C and '[ ? ]' and '[ ? ? ]' in Sec. E — that must be replaced with the intended references or removed.
  5. [Section III.C; S.I. Sec. B] The main text should state the actual mean photon number per pulse for the measurements labelled 'single-photon' (the S.I. reports detected counts as large as n_in = 2.557 with a Poisson-based saturation correction, but the input mean photon number at the crystal is not given in the main text), and the term 'single photons' should be qualified as weak coherent pulses; the uncertainty on the reported 5.03% single-photon efficiency should also be given.
  6. [Section III.B] The sentence 'The frequency bins can be coherently separated (interfered) when they enter the memory at the same (different) time bins' is unclear, and since no interference measurement appears in Fig. 3, the coherence claim in that sentence should be removed or supported by quantitative data.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the efficiency estimate and polarization process tomography are self-contained, and the frequency/time-bin qubit concern is an evidence gap rather than a circular derivation.

full rationale

Walking the claimed derivation chain: the AFC efficiency estimate uses Eq. (1) from prior literature with independently measured parameters (OD d ~3.3, finesse F ~3, background d0 ~1.3) and is compared with the measured 6% efficiency; this is a consistency check, not a fit of the target quantity. The interleaved pumping improvement is an empirical optimization over 850 experiments, not a quantity derived from its own result. The polarization storage claim is supported by a standard quantum process tomography with reported fidelities (92.3% and 95.5% at single-photon level), an independent validation. The frequency and time-bin storage claims are supported mainly by classical echo-intensity crosstalk ratios (S.I. Sec. C, F_alpha = alpha'/(alpha'+beta') with beta=0); while this does not certify coherent superposition and is a legitimate correctness concern, it is not circular: the ratio is measured, not fitted, and the text partially discloses the method as 'intensity noise estimation'. The only self-citation (Ref. [5], Hosseini) appears in the introduction for a general motivation statement and is not load-bearing for the results. Hence there is no derivation step that reduces by construction to its own inputs; the appropriate finding is no significant circularity, with a small allowance only for the non-load-bearing self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The central claim rests on the measured material parameters and the standard AFC model, plus an empirically optimized pumping sequence.

free parameters (1)
  • Pumping parameter set (H_i power, duration, spectral width; N_loop; in-loop delay)
    Five parameters of the interleaved pumping sequence were optimized by random search over 850 experiments to maximize efficiency; the optimal values are not explicitly stated in the paper.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math AFC efficiency formula (Eq. 1) from prior work [42,44] correctly models the storage efficiency of square combs.
    Used to compare predicted vs. measured efficiency in Sec. III.
  • domain assumption Er:YSO site 1 ions with B along D1-D2 plane at 135 degrees yield maximum gyromagnetic ratio and magnetic equivalence.
    Used to justify the field orientation and hole lifetime (Sect. II, based on Ref. [37]).
  • ad hoc to paper Input pulses attenuated to mean photon number ~0.4 follow Poisson statistics and can be treated as single-photon-level states for fidelity estimation.
    Used in S.I. Sec. C to interpret counts as single-photon level; this is a common but approximate treatment.
  • domain assumption The measured optical coherence time T2 = 169 us and hole lifetime of 3.16 s are sufficient for the AFC storage and retrieval in the demonstrated regime.
    Relies on the material properties and the specific magnetic field/temperature conditions (Fig. S1).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Efficient Storage of Multidimensional Telecom Photons in a Solid-State Quantum Memory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OSOFUSW7

@misc{pith2026241205480,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Efficient Storage of Multidimensional Telecom Photons in a Solid-State Quantum Memory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OSOFUSW7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.05480}
}
abstract

Efficient storage of telecom-band quantum optical information represents a crucial milestone for establishing distributed quantum optical networks. Erbium ions in crystalline hosts provide a promising platform for telecom quantum memories; however, their practical applications have been hindered by demanding operational conditions, such as ultra-high magnetic fields and ultra-low temperatures. In this work, we demonstrate the storage of telecom photonic qubits encoded in polarization, frequency, and time-bin bases. Using the atomic frequency comb protocol in an Er$^{3+}$-doped crystal, we developed a memory initialization scheme that improves storage efficiency by over an order of magnitude under practical experimental conditions. Quantum process tomography further confirms the memory's performance, achieving a fidelity exceeding 92%.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.05480 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Fig.1. The laser wavelength at 1536.3 nm coincides with the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic of the experimental system. A [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Schematic of the interleaved optical pumping seq [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Memory performance at the single-photon level. Cohe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Real and imaginary components of the reconstructed p [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Efficient Pumping of Spectral Holes in a Tm$^{3+}$: YAG Crystal for Broadband Quantum Optical Storage

    quant-ph 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Experiments achieve 28.5% storage efficiency and a 630 MHz bandwidth in a Tm:YAG atomic frequency comb memory at 3.5 K, and propose a scheme for wider bandwidth.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    H. J. Kimble, The quantum internet, Nature 453, 1023 (2008)

    2008

  2. [2]

    Wehner, D

    S. Wehner, D. Elkouss, and R. Hanson, Quantum internet: A vision for the road ahead, Science 362, eaam9288 (2018)

    2018

  3. [3]

    Briegel, W

    H.-J. Briegel, W. Dür, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Quantum r epeaters: the role of imperfect local operations in quantum communication, Physical Revie w Letters 81, 5932 (1998)

    work page 1998

  4. [4]

    L.-M. Duan, M. D. Lukin, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Long-d istance quantum communication with atomic ensembles and linear optics, Nature 414, 413 (2001)

    work page 2001

  5. [5]

    Y. Lei, F. K. Asadi, T. Zhong, A. Kuzmich, C. Simon, and M. H osseini, Quantum optical memory for entanglement distribution, Optica 10, 1511 (2023)

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Muralidharan, L

    S. Muralidharan, L. Li, J. Kim, N. Lütkenhaus, M. D. Lukin , and L. Jiang, Optimal architec- tures for long distance quantum communication, Scientific r eports 6, 20463 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Awschalom, K

    D. Awschalom, K. K. Berggren, H. Bernien, S. Bhave, L. D. Carr , P. Davids, S. E. Economou, D. Englund, A. Faraon, M. Fejer, et al. , Development of quantum interconnects (quics) for next-generation information technologies, Prx Quantum 2, 017002 (2021). 12

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Azuma, S

    K. Azuma, S. E. Economou, D. Elkouss, P. Hilaire, L. Jiang , H.-K. Lo, and I. Tzitrin, Quantum repeaters: From quantum networks to the quantum internet, Reviews of Modern Physics 95, 045006 (2023)

    work page 2023

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    Ma, Y.-Z

    Y. Ma, Y.-Z. Ma, Z.-Q. Zhou, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, One-h our coherent optical storage in an atomic frequency comb memory, Nature communications 12, 1 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    Simon, H

    C. Simon, H. De Riedmatten, M. Afzelius, N. Sangouard, H . Zbinden, and N. Gisin, Quantum repeaters with photon pair sources and mul timode memories, Physical review letters 98, 190503 (2007)

    2007

  3. [11]

    Yang, Z.-Q

    T.-S. Yang, Z.-Q. Zhou, Y.-L. Hua, X. Liu, Z.-F. Li, P.-Y . Li, Y. Ma, C. Liu, P.-J. Liang, X. Li, et al. , Multiplexed storage and real-time manipulation based on a multiple degree-of-freedom quantum memory, Nature communications 9, 3407 (2018)

    2018

  4. [12]

    F. Gu, S. G. Menon, D. Maier, A. Das, T. Chakraborty, W. Ti ttel, H. Bernien, and J. Bor- regaard, Hybrid quantum repeaters with ensemble-based qua ntum memories and single-spin photon transducers, arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.12395 (202 4)

  5. [13]

    Z.-Q. Zhou, C. Liu, C.-F. Li, G.-C. Guo, D. Oblak, M. Lei, A. Faraon, M. Mazzera, and H. de Riedmatten, Photonic integrated quantum memory in rare-earth doped solids, Laser & Photonics Reviews 17, 2300257 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    N. S. Perminov and S. A. Moiseev, Integrated multireson ator quantum memory, Entropy 25, 623 (2023)

    2023

  7. [15]

    Lago-Rivera, S

    D. Lago-Rivera, S. Grandi, J. V. Rakonjac, A. Seri, and H . de Riedmatten, Telecom-heralded entanglement between multimode solid-state quantum memor ies, Nature 594, 37 (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    X. Liu, J. Hu, Z.-F. Li, X. Li, P.-Y. Li, P.-J. Liang, Z.-Q . Zhou, C.-F. Li, and G.- C. Guo, Heralded entanglement distribution between two abs orptive quantum memories, Nature 594, 41 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    S. E. Thomas, L. Wagner, R. Joos, R. Sittig, C. Nawrath, P . Burdekin, I. M. de Buy Wenniger, M. J. Rasiah, T. Huber-Loyola, S. Sagona-Stophel, et al. , Deterministic storage and retrieval of telecom light from a quantum dot single-photon source int erfaced with an atomic quan...

    2024

  10. [18]

    Kaneda and P

    F. Kaneda and P. G. Kwiat, High-efficiency single-photon generation via large-scale active time multiplexing, Science advances 5, eaaw8586 (2019). 13

    2019

  11. [19]

    Kaneda, F

    F. Kaneda, F. Xu, J. Chapman, and P. G. Kwiat, Quantum-me mory-assisted multi-photon generation for efficient quantum information processing, Op tica 4, 1034 (2017)

    2017

  12. [20]

    Chrapkiewicz, M

    R. Chrapkiewicz, M. Dąbrowski, and W. Wasilewski, High -capacity angu- larly multiplexed holographic memory operating at the sing le-photon level, Physical review letters 118, 063603 (2017)

    2017

  13. [21]

    Knill, R

    E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and G. J. Milburn, A scheme for effici ent quantum computation with linear optics, nature 409, 46 (2001)

    2001

  14. [22]

    Zaiser, T

    S. Zaiser, T. Rendler, I. Jakobi, T. Wolf, S.-Y. Lee, S. W agner, V. Bergholm, T. Schulte- Herbrüggen, P. Neumann, and J. Wrachtrup, Enhancing quantu m sensing sensitivity by a quantum memory, Nature communications 7, 12279 (2016)

    2016

  15. [23]

    W. Ding, W. Zhang, and X. Wang, Quantum-memory-assiste d precision rotation sensing, Physical Review A 102, 032612 (2020)

    2020

  16. [24]

    J.-M. Mol, L. Esguerra, M. Meister, D. E. Bruschi, A. W. Sc hell, J. Wolters, and L. Wörner, Quantum memories for fundamental science in s pace, Quantum Science and Technology 8, 024006 (2023)

    2023

  17. [25]

    M. Guo, S. Liu, W. Sun, M. Ren, F. Wang, and M. Zhong, Rare- earth quantum memories: The experimental status quo, Frontiers of Physics 18, 21303 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    Afzelius, C

    M. Afzelius, C. Simon, H. De Riedmatten, and N. Gisin, Mu ltimode quantum memory based on atomic frequency combs, Physical Review A 79, 052329 (2009)

    2009

  19. [27]

    Rančić, M

    M. Rančić, M. P. Hedges, R. L. Ahlefeldt, and M. J. Sellar s, Coherence time of over a second in a telecom-compatible quantum memory storage material, N ature Physics 14, 50 (2018)

    2018

  20. [28]

    J. V. Rakonjac, Y.-H. Chen, S. P. Horvath, and J. J. Longd ell, Long spin coherence times in the ground state and in an optically excited state of er 3+ 167 : Y 2 sio 5 at zero magnetic field, Physical Review B 101, 184430 (2020)

    2020

  21. [29]

    Jiang, W

    M.-H. Jiang, W. Xue, Q. He, Y.-Y. An, X. Zheng, W.-J. Xu, Y .-B. Xie, Y. Lu, S. Zhu, and X.-S. Ma, Quantum storage of entangled photons at teleco m wavelengths in a crystal, Nature Communications 14, 6995 (2023)

    2023

  22. [30]

    Le Dantec, M

    M. Le Dantec, M. Rančić, S. Lin, E. Billaud, V. Ranjan, D. F lanigan, S. Bertaina, T. Chanelière, P. Goldner, A. Erb, et al. , Twenty-three–millisecond electron spin coherence of erbium ions in a natural-abundance crystal, Science adva nces 7, eabj9786 (2021). 14

    2021

  23. [31]

    M. T. Uysal, Ł. Dusanowski, H. Xu, S. P. Horvath, S. Ourar i, R. J. Cava, N. P. de Leon, and J. D. Thompson, Spin-photon entanglement of a single Er 3+ ion in the telecom band, arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.06515 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    N. T. Arnold, C. P. Lualdi, M. E. Goggin, and P. G. Kwiat, A ll-optical quantum memory, in Quantum Computing, Communication, and Simulation IV , Vol. 12911 (SPIE, 2024) pp. 390– 394

    2024

  25. [33]

    Hastings-Simon, B

    S. Hastings-Simon, B. Lauritzen, M. U. Staudt, J. L. M. va n Mechelen, C. Simon, H. de Ried- matten, M. Afzelius, and N. Gisin, Zeeman-level lifetimes i n er 3+: Y 2 sio 5, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 78, 085410 (2008)

    2008

  26. [34]

    J. S. Stuart, M. Hedges, R. Ahlefeldt, and M. Sellars, In itialization pro- tocol for efficient quantum memories using resolved hyperfine structure, Physical Review Research 3, L032054 (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    Craiciu, M

    I. Craiciu, M. Lei, J. Rochman, J. M. Kindem, J. G. Barthol omew, E. Miyazono, T. Zhong, N. Sinclair, and A. Faraon, Nanophotonic quantum storage at telecommunication wavelength, Physical Review Applied 12, 024062 (2019)

    2019

  28. [36]

    S.-H. Wei, B. Jing, X.-Y. Zhang, J.-Y. Liao, H. Li, L.-X. Y ou, Z. Wang, Y. Wang, G.-W. Deng, H.-Z. Song, et al. , Quantum storage of 1650 modes of single photons at telecom w avelength, npj Quantum Information 10, 19 (2024)

    2024

  29. [37]

    Y. Sun, T. Böttger, C. Thiel, and R. Cone, Magnetic g tenso rs for the i 15/ 2 4 and i 13/ 2 4 states of er 3+: Y 2 si o 5, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter a nd Materials Physics 77, 085124 (2008)

    2008

  30. [38]

    Böttger, Y

    T. Böttger, Y. Sun, C. Thiel, and R. Cone, Spectroscopy an d dynamics of er 3+: Y 2 si o 5 at 1.5 µ m, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 74, 075107 (2006)

    2006

  31. [39]

    Lauritzen, S

    B. Lauritzen, S. Hastings-Simon, H. De Riedmatten, M. Af zelius, and N. Gisin, State prepa- ration by optical pumping in erbium-doped solids using stim ulated emission and spin mixing, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics 78, 043402 (2008)

    2008

  32. [40]

    Macfarlane, T

    R. Macfarlane, T. Harris, Y. Sun, R. Cone, and R. Equall, Measurement of photon echoes in er: Y 2 sio 5 at 1.5 µ m with a diode laser and an amplifier, Optics letters 22, 871 (1997)

    1997

  33. [41]

    Minář, N

    J. Minář, N. Sangouard, M. Afzelius, H. de Riedmatten, a nd N. Gisin, Spin-wave storage using chirped control fields in atomic frequency com b-based quantum memory, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics 82, 042309 (2010). 15

    2010

  34. [42]

    Jobez, N

    P. Jobez, N. Timoney, C. Laplane, J. Etesse, A. Ferrier, P. Goldner, N. Gisin, and M. Afzelius, Towards highly multimode optical quantum memo ry for quantum repeaters, Physical Review A 93, 032327 (2016)

    2016

  35. [43]

    Craiciu, M

    I. Craiciu, M. Lei, J. Rochman, J. G. Bartholomew, and A. F araon, Multifunctional on-chip storage at telecommunication wavelength for quantum netwo rks, Optica 8, 114 (2021)

    2021

  36. [44]

    Bonarota, J

    M. Bonarota, J. Ruggiero, J.-L. Le Gouët, and T. Chaneliè re, Efficiency optimization for atomic frequency comb storage, Physical Review A 81, 033803 (2010)

    2010

  37. [45]

    J. L. O’Brien, G. J. Pryde, A. Gilchrist, D. F. James, N. K. Langford, T. C. Ralph, and A. G. White, Quantum process tomography of a controlled-not gate, Physical review letters 93, 080502 (2004)

    2004

  38. [46]

    I. L. Chuang and M. A. Nielsen, Prescription for experim ental determination of the dynamics of a quantum black box, Journal of Modern Optics 44, 2455 (1997)

    1997

  39. [47]

    Baldit, K

    E. Baldit, K. Bencheikh, P. Monnier, S. Briaudeau, J. Leven son, V. Crozatier, I. Lorgeré, F. Bretenaker, J. Le Gouët, O. Guillot-Noël, et al. , Identification of λ-like systems in er 3+: Y 2 sio 5 and observation of electromagnetically induced transparency, Physical Review B—C...

    2010

  40. [48]

    H.-H. Lu, M. Liscidini, A. L. Gaeta, A. M. Weiner, and J. M . Lukens, Frequency-bin photonic quantum information, Optica 10, 1655 (2023)

    2023

  41. [49]

    D. D. Awschalom, H. Bernien, R. Brown, A. Clerk, E. Chitamb ar, A. Dibos, J. Dionne, M. Eriksson, B. Fefferman, G. D. Fuchs, et al. , A roadmap for quantum interconnects , Tech. Rep. (Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL (Unit ed States), 2022)

    2022

  42. [50]

    Cryospot 5

    X. Zhang, B. Zhang, S. Wei, H. Li, J. Liao, C. Li, G. Deng, Y. Wang, H. Song, L. You, et al. , Telecom-band–integrated multimode photonic quantum mem ory, Science Advances 9, eadf4587 (2023). 16 arXiv:2412.05480v1 [quant-ph] 7 Dec 2024 Supplementary Information: Efficient Storag...

    2023 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.