Probing Gravity -- Fundamental Aspects of Metric Theories and their Implications for Tests of General Relativity

Jann Zosso

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Probing Gravity -- Fundamental Aspects of Metric Theories and their Implications for Tests of General Relativity

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This doctoral thesis claims that the displacement memory effect is the backreaction of gravitational-wave energy–momentum onto the background spacetime, and derives a general memory formula for metric theories beyond general relativity.

desk verdict Ambitious thesis with a promising central claim about memory as Isaacson backreaction that I could not verify from the excerpt; the conservation step in the generalized construction needs careful scrutiny. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.06043 v2 pith:2RAYJP65 submitted 2024-12-08 gr-qc

Jann Zosso This is my paper · ORCID

classification gr-qc MSC 83C3583D0583C40 PACS 04.30.-y04.50.-h

keywords gravitationalwavememorymetrictheoriesofgravityenergymomentumbackreactiondisplacementtestsgeneralrelativitypolarizations

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This doctoral thesis starts from the equivalence principle that identifies gravitation with the dynamics of spacetime rather than a force, and asks what the broad class of metric theories—theories in which all matter couples universally and minimally to one physical metric—predict for gravitational-wave observations. Its central claim is that the permanent distortion left in space after a wave passes, the displacement memory effect, is not a separate phenomenon: it is the backreaction of the energy and momentum carried by the wave onto the slowly varying background. Because the claim is proved inside the standard high-frequency averaging scheme used to define gravitational-wave energy, it yields a memory formula that holds for a large class of metric theories, not only for general relativity. If correct, memory becomes a generic prediction of metric theories and a future detection of it could probe how many radiative degrees of freedom nature actually has.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the wave–background averaging scheme: split the full metric into a slowly varying background plus high-frequency perturbations, average products of perturbations over an intermediate scale, and read off two leading-order systems—a propagation equation for the waves and a coarse-grained backreaction equation whose source is the wave energy–momentum. The workhorse identity is that the averaged quadratic terms give a gauge-invariant, covariantly conserved energy–momentum tensor for gravitational waves; the paper's novel step is to identify the backreaction equation, not some separate radiation-reaction mechanism, with the displacement memory effect. The theorem uses that conservation and the scale split to derive the functional form of the tensor memory without fixing the details of the gravitational action.

What would settle it

Compute both sides explicitly in a solvable exact wave solution of a metric theory—the low-frequency backreaction of the averaged wave energy–momentum on the background and the full nonlinear displacement memory—and show they are not equal; observationally, a measured memory amplitude that disagrees with the energy–momentum formula derived in the theorem would falsify the identification.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that the low-frequency piece of the perturbed field equations—the piece governing how the background spacetime responds to the averaged presence of high-frequency waves—is exactly the displacement memory effect. The averaged quadratic wave terms define a gauge-invariant, covariantly conserved energy–momentum for gravitational waves, and the backreaction of that energy–momentum onto the background is the permanent relative displacement of test masses measured after the wave has passed. This unifies the two known forms of memory: null memory, sourced by unbound energy flux that reaches null infinity, and ordinary memory, sourced by flux that never gets there. The main theorem then uses the conservation of the averaged energy–momentum to fix the tensor memory amplitude for a large class of metric theories, reproducing the general-relativistic null-memory limit and extending the prediction to theories with extra scalar or vector radiative degrees of freedom.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation depends on there being a clean split of scales between the gravitational wave and the background, so that averaging the wave's energy–momentum is well-defined, gauge-invariant, and conserved; if extra fields of different masses or speeds blur that split, the memory formula may not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Memory stops being an independent effect: it follows from the same coarse-graining that defines gravitational-wave energy–momentum, so any metric theory with well-defined waves has memory.
Null and ordinary memory receive one unified explanation, differing only in whether the radiating energy flux reaches asymptotic null infinity.
A general tensor-memory formula applies to a large class of metric theories, so a measured memory waveform can constrain beyond-general-relativity radiative degrees of freedom.
Detectors sensitive to memory see additional scalar and vector polarizations, making memory a consistency test for any extra gravitational fields found in ordinary wave signals.
The result turns memory into a direct probe of gravity's self-coupling: the wave bends the space it travels through, and memory is the leftover bending.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the identification is literal, the memory signal and the stochastic gravitational-wave background should be two views of the same energy–momentum: the flux that builds the background also drives the memory, so joint observations of both could test the identification.
The theorem's domain is set by the averaging assumptions, so massive or subluminal radiative fields are the natural place to look for deviations; a memory formula that is universal for light-speed tensor modes could be measurably suppressed or delayed for massive modes.
Numerical relativity could settle the identification in the strong-field regime: compute the averaged backreaction of the radiation emitted by a binary merger and compare it directly with the full nonlinear memory waveform.
The framework suggests a new null test of general relativity: measure the tensor memory amplitude and the radiated energy–momentum from the same event and check that they obey the theorem's ratio, independent of the source model.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

First thing you should know: this is a PhD thesis, and the excerpt I saw covers only the first ~80 pages plus the abstract and table of contents. The central new idea—treating displacement memory as the backreaction of the Isaacson GW energy-momentum in generic metric theories—is genuinely interesting and, if it holds up, gives a unified derivation of null and ordinary memory and a memory formula beyond GR. The available text is careful and well-organized; the review of metric theories, gauge, and perturbation theory is more thoughtful than most.

The main soft spot is exactly where the stress-test points. Section 4.3.1 begins the generalized Isaacson construction, and earlier the thesis asserts that the GW pseudotensor is covariantly conserved because "covariant derivation and the average commute." The stated averaging properties (I)–(III) do not obviously imply that commutation. In the standard GR case this works because you combine the commutation (to leading order in the scale separation) with the linearized equations of motion and the background Bianchi identity. But for non-minimal fields, where Sec. 2.3 says no locally conserved energy-momentum exists, the generalized argument has to do more work. The proof of Lemma 1 and Theorem 3 is relegated to Appendices C.3–C.4, which weren't in the excerpt. So I can't certify the central theorem; if those appendices don't contain a careful conservation proof, this is a genuine gap.

The good news: what I did read is coherent and the claims are stated precisely enough to check. The quantum stability results for luminal Horndeski and generalized Proca are also citable if they survive inspection. The thesis is long and the review parts dilute the novelty, but that's a feature of the genre, not a flaw.

Who should read it: anyone working on gravitational-wave memory, modified gravity, or Isaacson-type backreaction. It would make a fine reading-group topic for the memory chapter, though I'd want the appendix proofs in hand.

Recommendation: if a journal or editor receives this as a paper, it deserves a serious referee. The referee should focus on the conservation argument in the generalized Isaacson construction and on Theorem 3. I would not desk-reject it.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a doctoral thesis in gr-qc that reviews the foundations of metric theories of gravity and advertises three main results: a generalized Isaacson approach that assigns a well-defined energy-momentum to gravitational waves in generic metric theories; the identification of gravitational displacement memory with the backreaction of this Isaacson energy-momentum onto the background, leading to a universal memory formula (Theorem 3, Sec. 7.2.1); and additional analyses of cosmological tensions and quantum stability of Horndeski and generalized Proca theories. The available text covers the pedagogical development of special relativity on manifolds, the equivalence principle, metric theories, the Lovelock theorem, perturbative degrees of freedom, and the Isaacson approach for GR, with the generalization beyond GR starting in Sec. 4.3.1. The submitted text is truncated: Chapter 7, much of Chapters 9 and 11, and the appended proofs of Lemma 1 and Theorem 3 (Appendices C.3 and C.4) are not present, so the central memory theorem cannot be independently checked from the provided material.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper would unify null and ordinary gravitational-wave memory under a single mechanism and provide a memory formula for a broad class of metric theories, giving a concrete, falsifiable target for future gravitational-wave observatories. The thesis also contributes a careful pedagogical treatment of gauge freedom, scale separation, and the physical status of the equivalence principle, and its model-agnostic cosmological constraints are a useful methodological contribution. The strengths of the available text include the explicit statement of the Isaacson assumptions, the multiple-scale argument leading to the hierarchy condition in Eq. (4.53), and the honest acknowledgment in Sec. 2.3 that non-minimal fields lack a locally conserved energy-momentum tensor. However, the advertised central result rests on proofs and derivations that are not present in the submitted text, so the paper cannot currently be judged on its main claim.

major comments (4)

[Sec. 4.2.1, Eq. (4.56)] The conservation statement \bar{\nabla}_\mu {}^{(2)}t^{\rm GR}_{\mu\nu}=0 is justified by the assertion that covariant derivation and the average commute. The stated averaging properties (I)-(III) do not imply this commutation for a quadratic object such as \langle{}^{(2)}G_{\mu\nu}[\delta g_H]\rangle; they only regulate high-frequency total derivatives inside the average. Because Eq. (4.52) is integrated in Chapter 7 to obtain a permanent displacement, this conservation is load-bearing. Please provide a proof for a general background spacetime with nonzero curvature, or state the additional properties of the averaging scheme that are required.
[Appendices C.3-C.4] Appendix C.3 is listed as the proof of Lemma 1 and Appendix C.4 as the proof of Theorem 3, but neither proof is present in the submitted text. The gauge invariance and covariant conservation of the generalized Isaacson energy-momentum tensor, and hence the memory theorem in Sec. 7.2.1, are therefore unverified. A revised version must include these proofs in full, or the theorem must be explicitly stated as conditional on the missing construction.
[Secs. 2.3 and 4.3.1] Section 2.3 states that non-minimal fields in the gravity sector possess no locally conserved energy-momentum tensor, yet the generalized Isaacson construction must nevertheless define an effective source for the low-frequency backreaction equation that is gauge invariant and covariantly conserved. The text cuts off exactly as this prescription is introduced. For non-minimal fields with masses and propagation speeds different from the tensor mode, the clean scale separation of Sec. 4.2.1 is not guaranteed. Please provide at least one worked example, such as a scalar-tensor or massive-vector theory, showing explicitly that the averaged quadratic source is conserved on the background.
[Sec. 7.2.1, Theorem 3] The identification of displacement memory with the backreaction of the Isaacson energy-momentum onto the background risks being definitional if the memory formula is obtained simply by integrating the backreaction equation. To establish the claimed unification, the theorem must show that the backreaction-derived displacement coincides with the independent notion of displacement memory measured by geodesic deviation and that it reproduces the known GR null-memory result in the appropriate limit. The available text does not provide this comparison.

minor comments (5)

[Throughout] The word 'spacial' should be 'spatial' throughout the manuscript.
[Introduction] There are several grammatical slips in the Introduction, including 'It’s apparent incompatibility' and 'theoretical physicist’s'; these should be corrected.
[Sec. 1.2] The text contains typos such as 'hols' for 'holds' and 'coordinatize' for 'coordinatize'; a careful proofread is needed.
[Eq. (4.36)] The expansion x'^\mu(x) \approx a^\mu + (\Lambda^{-1})^\mu_\nu x^\nu + \xi^\mu(x) contains an index structure that should be made consistent; the linear term should be written with x^\nu, not x^\mu.
[Sec. 4.2.2] The use of \bar{h}_{\mu\nu} for the trace-reversed perturbation in Eq. (4.65) conflicts notationally with the exact background solution \bar{g}_{\mu\nu}; consider a different symbol such as \hat{h}_{\mu\nu}.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the memory result is derived from the low-frequency backreaction equation and anchored to the independent geodesic-deviation notion; technical gaps or missing proofs are not circularity.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain, the central claim is not circular. The Isaacson low-frequency backreaction equation (4.52) determines the low-frequency metric perturbation from the averaged quadratic stress of the high-frequency waves, and the object called displacement memory is independently anchored to geodesic-deviation observables in Secs. 1.2, 2.2 and Chapter 7. The later identification of backreaction with memory is therefore a physical statement to be proven, not a definition of memory as whatever the backreaction happens to be. The GR part contains no fitted input renamed as a prediction: the inputs are the Einstein equations, the small-amplitude and scale-separation assumptions, and the stated averaging properties (I)-(III). The extension beyond GR is attributed to the authors' earlier work [241] and reproduced in the thesis, which is ordinary research continuity rather than a load-bearing self-citation; no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work to forbid alternatives. The concern that Eq. (4.56) does not follow from the stated averaging properties alone is a rigor/correctness gap about the conservation of the generalized Isaacson tensor, not a circular reduction: no equation in the provided text defines the memory formula as the backreaction by fiat. Appendices C.3-C.4 are listed but their content is not available in the excerpt, so any claim that Theorem 3 reduces to an assumption would be speculation rather than demonstrated circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The main structural inputs are the equivalence principle and the Isaacson scale-separation assumptions. The small expansion parameters alpha and fL/fH are control parameters, not fitted constants. No new entities are introduced; the quantum speculation in Chapter 12 is programmatic.

free parameters (2)

alpha (perturbation amplitude) = unspecified, small (alpha << 1)
Isaacson assumption (1), Sec 4.2.1: the high-frequency metric perturbation is small; the derivation order-by-order depends on alpha but does not fix it.
fL/fH (frequency scale ratio) = unspecified, small (fL/fH << 1)
Isaacson assumption (2), Sec 4.2.1: clean separation of scales is required to define the split into background and wave.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption The Einstein equivalence principle and the associated principle of universal and minimal coupling to a physical metric (Principle 3 and 4, Sec 2.1-2.2).
Defines the space of metric theories that the memory derivation applies to; if a theory violates EEP, the framework does not apply.
standard math Spacetime is a 4D pseudo-Riemannian manifold with Levi-Civita connection (Definition 1, Sec 2.2).
Standard differential geometry background for all derivations.
domain assumption Isaacson assumptions: small-amplitude perturbations and clean scale separation with averaging properties (I)-(III) (Sec 4.2.1).
These assumptions justify the split into background and wave, the definition of GW energy-momentum, and the identification of backreaction with memory.
domain assumption For the quantum part, gravity is treated as a quantum effective field theory (Sec 10.1).
The quantum stability analysis of Horndeski and generalized Proca is performed within the EFT framework; the results depend on this interpretation.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Probing Gravity -- Fundamental Aspects of Metric Theories and their Implications for Tests of General Relativity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2RAYJP65

@misc{pith2026241206043,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Probing Gravity -- Fundamental Aspects of Metric Theories and their Implications for Tests of General Relativity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2RAYJP65}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.06043}
}

read the original abstract

Guided by the Einstein equivalence principle that identifies the phenomenon of gravitation as a manifestation of the dynamics of spacetime in contrast to a localizable force, we review and explore its consequences on formulating a theory of gravity. The resulting space of metric theories of gravity may address open conceptual and observational puzzles through a wealth of effects beyond general relativity, whose traces can be searched for within today's and tomorrow's gravitational testing grounds. Above all, we offer a generic metric theory generalization of Isaacson's approach to the leading-order field equations of physical perturbations with a well-defined notion of energy-momentum carried by the gravitational waves. Within this framework, we identify the backreaction of the Isaacson energy-momentum flux onto the background spacetime with the displacement memory effect that induces a permanent distortion of space after the passage of a gravitational wave. This effect is a well-known prediction of GR whose dominant contribution captures its inherent non-linear nature, manifest in the ability of gravity to gravitate. However, the novel interpretation of memory as naturally arising within the Isaacson approach to gravitational waves comes with two main advantages. Firstly, it allows for a unified understanding of both the null and the ordinary memory effect, which are respectively sourced by unbound energy fluxes that do and do not reach asymptotic null infinity. Secondly, and most importantly, this approach allows for a consistent derivation of the memory formula for a large class of metric theories with considerable lessons to be learned for upcoming future measurements of the memory effect.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Scalar memory from compact binary coalescences
gr-qc 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

In Ricci-coupled scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, the change in scalar charge during binary black hole mergers generates a scalar memory contribution that modifies the total memory signal on observable timescales.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Die Feldgleichungen der Gravitation,

A. Einstein, “Die Feldgleichungen der Gravitation,”Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin(1915) 844–847

1915
[2]

Die Grundlagen der Physik. (Erste Mitteilung.),

D. Hilbert, “Die Grundlagen der Physik. (Erste Mitteilung.),”Nachrichten von der Koeniglichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Goettingen, Math-physik. Klasse(1915) 395–407

1915
[3]

Die Grundlage der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie,

A. Einstein, “Die Grundlage der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie,”Annalen der Physik354 no. 7, (1916) 769–822

1916
[4]

Weinberg,Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity

S. Weinberg,Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity. Wiley, 1972

1972
[5]

C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler,Gravitation. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1973

1973
[6]

R. M. Wald,General Relativity. Chicago Univ. Pr., Chicago, USA, 1984

1984
[7]

Landau and E

L. Landau and E. Lifshitz,The Classical Theory of Fields (Fourth Edition). Pergamon, 1975

1975
[8]

The Basics of gravitational wave theory,

E. E. Flanagan and S. A. Hughes, “The Basics of gravitational wave theory,” New J. Phys.7 (2005) 204, arXiv:gr-qc/0501041

arXiv 2005

Show all 300 references

[9]

Maggiore,Gravitational Waves: Volume 1: Theory and Experiments

M. Maggiore,Gravitational Waves: Volume 1: Theory and Experiments. Oxford University Press, 10, 2007

2007
[10]

Zee,Einstein Gravity in a Nutshell

A. Zee,Einstein Gravity in a Nutshell. Princeton University Press, 2013

2013
[11]

Poisson and C

E. Poisson and C. M. Will,Gravity: Newtonian, Post-Newtonian, Relativistic. Cambridge University Press, 2014

2014
[12]

Lecture Notes on General Relativity,

M. Blau, “Lecture Notes on General Relativity,” 2017. www.blau.itp.unibe.ch/newlecturesGR.pdf

2017
[13]

Guidry,Modern General Relativity: Black Holes, Gravitational Waves, and Cosmology

M. Guidry,Modern General Relativity: Black Holes, Gravitational Waves, and Cosmology. Cambridge University Press, 2019. https://books.google.ch/books?id=ryGhzQEACAAJ. 439

2019
[14]

C. M. Will,Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics. Cambridge University Press, 2 ed., 2018

2018
[15]

S. M. Carroll,Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity. Cambridge University Press, 2019

2019
[16]

Renner,Lecture notes: General Relativity

R. Renner,Lecture notes: General Relativity. Institute for Theoretical Physics - ETH Zurich, 2020

2020
[17]

Coleman Miller and N

M. Coleman Miller and N. Yunes,Gravitational Waves in Physics and Astrophysics. IOP, 12, 2021

2021
[18]

Jetzer,Applications of General Relativity

P. Jetzer,Applications of General Relativity. Springer Cham, 1 ed., 2022

2022
[19]

IX. A determination of the deflection of light by the sun’s gravitational field, from observations made at the total eclipse of May 29, 1919,

F. W. Dyson, A. S. Eddington, and C. Davidson, “IX. A determination of the deflection of light by the sun’s gravitational field, from observations made at the total eclipse of May 29, 1919,”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers ...

1920
[20]

The Relativity Effect in Planetary Motions,

G. M. Clemence, “The Relativity Effect in Planetary Motions,”Rev. Mod. Phys. 19 (Oct, 1947) 361–364

1947
[21]

Gravitational Red-Shift in Nuclear Resonance,

R. V. Pound and G. A. Rebka, “Gravitational Red-Shift in Nuclear Resonance,” Phys. Rev. Lett.3 (Nov, 1959) 439–441

1959
[22]

On Experimental Tests of the General Theory of Relativity,

L. I. Schiff, “On Experimental Tests of the General Theory of Relativity,” American Journal of Physics28 no. 4, (04, 1960) 340–343

1960
[23]

Measurement of the Transverse Doppler Effect in an Accelerated System,

W. Kündig, “Measurement of the Transverse Doppler Effect in an Accelerated System,”Phys. Rev.129 (Mar, 1963) 2371–2375

1963
[24]

Experimental relativity,

R. H. Dicke, “Experimental relativity,” inLes Houches Summer Shcool of Theoretical Physics: Relativity, Groups and Topology, pp. 165–316. 1964

1964
[25]

Fourth Test of General Relativity,

I. I. Shapiro, “Fourth Test of General Relativity,”Phys. Rev. Lett.13 (Dec,
[26]

Equivalence Principle for Massive Bodies. 2. Theory,

K. Nordtvedt, “Equivalence Principle for Massive Bodies. 2. Theory,”Phys. Rev.169 (1968) 1017–1025

1968
[27]

Equivalence Principle for Massive Bodies. I. Phenomenology,

K. Nordtvedt, “Equivalence Principle for Massive Bodies. I. Phenomenology,”Phys. Rev.169 (1968) 1014–1016

1968
[28]

Testing Relativity with Laser Ranging to the Moon,

K. Nordtvedt, “Testing Relativity with Laser Ranging to the Moon,”Phys. Rev.170 (Jun, 1968) 1186–1187. 440

1968
[29]

Effective Temperature, Radius, and Gravitational Redshift of Sirius B,

J. L. Greenstein, J. B. Oke, and H. L. Shipman, “Effective Temperature, Radius, and Gravitational Redshift of Sirius B,”Astrophysical Journal169 (1971) 563

1971
[30]

A new test of general relativity - Gravitational radiation and the binary pulsar PSR 1913+16,

J. H. Taylor and J. M. Weisberg, “A new test of general relativity - Gravitational radiation and the binary pulsar PSR 1913+16,”Astrophysical Journal 253 (1982) 908–920

1982
[31]

A test of general relativity using radio links with the Cassini spacecraft,

B. Bertotti, L. Iess, and P. Tortora, “A test of general relativity using radio links with the Cassini spacecraft,”Nature425 (2003) 374–376

2003
[32]

A confirmation of the general relativistic prediction of the Lense-Thirring effect,

I. Ciufolini and E. C. Pavlis, “A confirmation of the general relativistic prediction of the Lense-Thirring effect,”Nature431 (2004) 958–960

2004
[33]

Skewness as a test of the equivalence principle,

L. Amendola and C. Quercellini, “Skewness as a test of the equivalence principle,” Phys. Rev. Lett.92 (2004) 181102, arXiv:astro-ph/0403019

2004 arXiv
[34]

Progress in lunar laser ranging tests of relativistic gravity,

J. G. Williams, S. G. Turyshev, and D. H. Boggs, “Progress in lunar laser ranging tests of relativistic gravity,”Phys. Rev. Lett.93 (2004) 261101, arXiv:gr-qc/0411113

2004 arXiv
[35]

Relativistic binary pulsar B1913+16: Thirty years of observations and analysis,

J. M. Weisberg and J. H. Taylor, “Relativistic binary pulsar B1913+16: Thirty years of observations and analysis,”ASP Conf. Ser.328 (2005) 25, arXiv:astro-ph/0407149

2005 arXiv
[36]

Modern tests of Lorentz invariance,

D. Mattingly, “Modern tests of Lorentz invariance,”Living Rev. Rel.8 (2005) 5, arXiv:gr-qc/0502097

2005 arXiv
[37]

Lunar laser ranging tests of the equivalence principle with the earth and moon,

J. G. Williams, S. G. Turyshev, and D. H. Boggs, “Lunar laser ranging tests of the equivalence principle with the earth and moon,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 18 (2009) 1129–1175, arXiv:gr-qc/0507083

2009 arXiv
[38]

Tests of the gravitational inverse-square law below the dark-energy length scale,

D. J. Kapner, T. S. Cook, E. G. Adelberger, J. H. Gundlach, B. R. Heckel, C. D. Hoyle, and H. E. Swanson, “Tests of the gravitational inverse-square law below the dark-energy length scale,”Phys. Rev. Lett.98 (2007) 021101, arXiv:hep-ph/0611184

2007 arXiv
[39]

Experimental Tests of General Relativity,

S. G. Turyshev, “Experimental Tests of General Relativity,”Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.58 (2008) 207–248, arXiv:0806.1731 [gr-qc]

2008 arXiv
[40]

Testing Properties of the Galactic Center Black Hole Using Stellar Orbits,

D. Merritt, T. Alexander, S. Mikkola, and C. M. Will, “Testing Properties of the Galactic Center Black Hole Using Stellar Orbits,”Phys. Rev. D81 (2010) 062002, arXiv:0911.4718 [astro-ph.GA] . 441

2010 arXiv
[41]

Gravity Probe B: Final Results of a Space Experiment to Test General Relativity,

C. W. F. Everittet al., “Gravity Probe B: Final Results of a Space Experiment to Test General Relativity,”Phys. Rev. Lett.106 (2011) 221101, arXiv:1105.3456 [gr-qc]

2011 arXiv
[42]

Testing General Relativity at Cosmological Scales: Implementation and Parameter Correlations,

J. N. Dossett, M. Ishak, and J. Moldenhauer, “Testing General Relativity at Cosmological Scales: Implementation and Parameter Correlations,”Phys. Rev. D84 (2011) 123001, arXiv:1109.4583 [astro-ph.CO]

2011 arXiv
[43]

Proposal for an Observational Test of the Vainshtein Mechanism,

L. Hui and A. Nicolis, “Proposal for an Observational Test of the Vainshtein Mechanism,” Phys. Rev. Lett.109 (2012) 051304, arXiv:1201.1508 [astro-ph.CO]

2012 arXiv
[44]

Model-Independent Test of General Relativity: An Extended post-Einsteinian Framework with Complete Polarization Content,

K. Chatziioannou, N. Yunes, and N. Cornish, “Model-Independent Test of General Relativity: An Extended post-Einsteinian Framework with Complete Polarization Content,”Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 022004, arXiv:1204.2585 [gr-qc] . [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 95, 129901 (2017)]

2012 arXiv
[45]

Gravitational-Wave Tests of General Relativity with Ground-Based Detectors and Pulsar Timing-Arrays,

N. Yunes and X. Siemens, “Gravitational-Wave Tests of General Relativity with Ground-Based Detectors and Pulsar Timing-Arrays,”Living Rev. Rel. 16 (2013) 9, arXiv:1304.3473 [gr-qc]

2013 arXiv
[46]

The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment,

C. M. Will, “The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment,” Living Rev. Rel.17 (2014) 4, arXiv:1403.7377 [gr-qc]

2014 arXiv
[47]

Testing Relativistic Gravity with Radio Pulsars,

N. Wex, “Testing Relativistic Gravity with Radio Pulsars,” arXiv:1402.5594 [gr-qc]

arXiv
[48]

Testing General Relativity with Present and Future Astrophysical Observations,

E. Bertiet al., “Testing General Relativity with Present and Future Astrophysical Observations,”Class. Quant. Grav.32 (2015) 243001, arXiv:1501.07274 [gr-qc]

2015 arXiv
[49]

Theoretical Physics Implications of the Binary Black-Hole Mergers GW150914 and GW151226,

N. Yunes, K. Yagi, and F. Pretorius, “Theoretical Physics Implications of the Binary Black-Hole Mergers GW150914 and GW151226,”Phys. Rev. D94 no. 8, (2016) 084002,arXiv:1603.08955 [gr-qc]

2016 arXiv
[50]

Testing local Lorentz invariance with gravitational waves,

V. A. Kostelecký and M. Mewes, “Testing local Lorentz invariance with gravitational waves,”Phys. Lett. B757 (2016) 510–514, arXiv:1602.04782 [gr-qc]

2016 arXiv
[51]

Tests of general relativity with GW150914,

LIGO Scientific, VirgoCollaboration, B. P. Abbottet al., “Tests of general relativity with GW150914,”Phys. Rev. Lett.116 no. 22, (2016) 221101, arXiv:1602.03841 [gr-qc] . [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 121, 129902 (2018)]

2016 arXiv
[52]

Tests of General Relativity: A Review,

E. Asmodelle, “Tests of General Relativity: A Review,” bachelor thesis, Central Lancashire U., 2017. 442

2017
[53]

Tests of Gravity Theories Using Supermassive Black Holes,

J. Sakstein, B. Jain, J. S. Heyl, and L. Hui, “Tests of Gravity Theories Using Supermassive Black Holes,”Astrophys. J. Lett.844 no. 1, (2017) L14, arXiv:1704.02425 [astro-ph.CO]

2017 arXiv
[54]

Tests of General Relativity with GW170817,

LIGO Scientific, VirgoCollaboration, B. P. Abbottet al., “Tests of General Relativity with GW170817,”Phys. Rev. Lett.123 no. 1, (2019) 011102, arXiv:1811.00364 [gr-qc]

2019 arXiv
[55]

Limits on the number of spacetime dimensions from GW170817,

K. Pardo, M. Fishbach, D. E. Holz, and D. N. Spergel, “Limits on the number of spacetime dimensions from GW170817,”JCAP 07 (2018) 048, arXiv:1801.08160 [gr-qc]

2018 arXiv
[56]

Testing General Relativity in Cosmology,

M. Ishak, “Testing General Relativity in Cosmology,”Living Rev. Rel.22 no. 1, (2019) 1,arXiv:1806.10122 [astro-ph.CO]

2019 arXiv
[57]

Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap,

L. Baracket al., “Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap,”Class. Quant. Grav.36 no. 14, (2019) 143001, arXiv:1806.05195 [gr-qc]

2019 arXiv
[58]

Dark energy in Horndeski theories after GW170817: A review,

R. Kase and S. Tsujikawa, “Dark energy in Horndeski theories after GW170817: A review,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. D28 no. 05, (2019) 1942005, arXiv:1809.08735 [gr-qc]

2019 arXiv
[59]

Fundamental Physics Implications for Higher-Curvature Theories from Binary Black Hole Signals in the LIGO-Virgo Catalog GWTC-1,

R. Nair, S. Perkins, H. O. Silva, and N. Yunes, “Fundamental Physics Implications for Higher-Curvature Theories from Binary Black Hole Signals in the LIGO-Virgo Catalog GWTC-1,”Phys. Rev. Lett.123 no. 19, (2019) 191101, arXiv:1905.00870 [gr-qc]

2019 arXiv
[60]

Tests of General Relativity with the Binary Black Hole Signals from the LIGO-Virgo Catalog GWTC-1,

LIGO Scientific, VirgoCollaboration, B. P. Abbottet al., “Tests of General Relativity with the Binary Black Hole Signals from the LIGO-Virgo Catalog GWTC-1,”Phys. Rev. D100 no. 10, (2019) 104036, arXiv:1903.04467 [gr-qc]

2019 arXiv
[61]

Tests of general relativity with binary black holes from the second LIGO-Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalog,

LIGO Scientific, VirgoCollaboration, R. Abbottet al., “Tests of general relativity with binary black holes from the second LIGO-Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalog,”Phys. Rev. D103 no. 12, (2021) 122002, arXiv:2010.14529 [gr-qc]

2021 arXiv
[62]

Testing General Relativity with Gravitational Waves,

Z. Carson and K. Yagi, “Testing General Relativity with Gravitational Waves,” arXiv:2011.02938 [gr-qc]

2011 arXiv
[63]

Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3,

LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRACollaboration, R. Abbottet al., “Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3,”arXiv:2112.06861 [gr-qc] . 443

arXiv
[64]

Testing General Relativity with Gravitational Waves: An Overview,

N. V. Krishnendu and F. Ohme, “Testing General Relativity with Gravitational Waves: An Overview,”Universe 7 no. 12, (2021) 497, arXiv:2201.05418 [gr-qc]

2021 arXiv
[65]

Improved gravitational-wave constraints on higher-order curvature theories of gravity,

S. E. Perkins, R. Nair, H. O. Silva, and N. Yunes, “Improved gravitational-wave constraints on higher-order curvature theories of gravity,” Phys. Rev. D104 no. 2, (2021) 024060,arXiv:2104.11189 [gr-qc]

2021 arXiv
[66]

Testing general relativity with cosmological large scale structure,

R. Durrer, “Testing general relativity with cosmological large scale structure,” Gen. Rel. Grav.54 no. 8, (2022) 88,arXiv:2204.05601 [astro-ph.CO]

2022 arXiv
[67]

Rescuing constraints on modified gravity using gravitational redshift in large-scale structure,

S. Castello, N. Grimm, and C. Bonvin, “Rescuing constraints on modified gravity using gravitational redshift in large-scale structure,”Phys. Rev. D 106 no. 8, (2022) 083511,arXiv:2204.11507 [astro-ph.CO]

2022 arXiv
[68]

Model-independent test for gravity using intensity mapping and galaxy clustering,

M. M. Abidi, C. Bonvin, M. Jalilvand, and M. Kunz, “Model-independent test for gravity using intensity mapping and galaxy clustering,”Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 6, (2023) 063514,arXiv:2208.10419 [astro-ph.CO]

2023 arXiv
[69]

The problems of quantum gravity,

J. Rayski, “The problems of quantum gravity,”Gen Relat Gravit11 (1979) 19–24

1979
[70]

Canonical quantum gravity and the problem of time,

C. J. Isham, “Canonical quantum gravity and the problem of time,”NATO Sci. Ser. C409 (1993) 157–287, arXiv:gr-qc/9210011

1993 arXiv
[71]

Kiefer,Quantum gravity, vol

C. Kiefer,Quantum gravity, vol. 124. Clarendon, Oxford, 2004

2004
[72]

Rickles, S

D. Rickles, S. French, and J. T. Saatsi,The Structural Foundations of Quantum Gravity. Oxford University Press, 11, 2006

2006
[73]

Five Problems in Quantum Gravity,

A. Strominger, “Five Problems in Quantum Gravity,”Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 192-193 (2009) 119–125, arXiv:0906.1313 [hep-th]

2009 arXiv
[74]

The Problem of Time in Quantum Gravity,

E. Anderson, “The Problem of Time in Quantum Gravity,” arXiv:1009.2157 [gr-qc]

arXiv
[75]

Lindesay,Foundations of quantum gravity

J. Lindesay,Foundations of quantum gravity. Cambridge Univ. Pr., 2013

2013
[76]

Ashtekar and V

A. Ashtekar and V. Petkov, eds.,Springer Handbook of Spacetime. Springer, Berlin, 2014

2014
[77]

The deepest problem: some perspectives on quantum gravity,

S. B. Giddings, “The deepest problem: some perspectives on quantum gravity,” arXiv:2202.08292 [hep-th]

arXiv
[78]

C. M. De Witt, ed.,Proceedings: Conference on the Role of Gravitation in Physics, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, Jan 18-23, 1957. 1957. 444

1957
[79]

A glimpse to Feynman’s contributions to the debate on the foundations of quantum mechanics,

M. Di Mauro, S. Esposito, and A. Naddeo, “A glimpse to Feynman’s contributions to the debate on the foundations of quantum mechanics,” in 16th Marcel Grossmann Meeting on Recent Developments in Theoretical and Experimental General Relativity, Astrophysics and Relativistic Fiel...

2021 arXiv
[80]

M. B. Green, J. H. Schwarz, and E. Witten,SUPERSTRING THEORY. VOL. 1: INTRODUCTION. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. 7, 1988

1988
[81]

M. B. Green, J. H. Schwarz, and E. Witten,SUPERSTRING THEORY. VOL. 2: LOOP AMPLITUDES, ANOMALIES AND PHENOMENOLOGY. 7, 1988

1988
[82]

Polchinski,String theory

J. Polchinski,String theory. Vol. 1: An introduction to the bosonic string. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 12, 2007

2007
[83]

Polchinski,String theory

J. Polchinski,String theory. Vol. 2: Superstring theory and beyond. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 12, 2007

2007
[84]

Weinberg,The quantum theory of fields

S. Weinberg,The quantum theory of fields. Vol. 3: Supersymmetry. Cambridge University Press, 6, 2013

2013
[85]

Zwiebach,A first course in string theory

B. Zwiebach,A first course in string theory. Cambridge University Press, 7, 2006

2006
[86]

String theory: a perspective over the last 25 years,

S. Mukhi, “String theory: a perspective over the last 25 years,”Class. Quant. Grav.28 (2011) 153001, arXiv:1110.2569 [physics.pop-ph]

2011 arXiv
[87]

Loop quantum gravity,

C. Rovelli, “Loop quantum gravity,”Living Rev. Rel.1 (1998) 1, arXiv:gr-qc/9710008

1998 arXiv
[88]

Gambini and J

R. Gambini and J. Pullin,A first course in loop quantum gravity. 2011

2011
[89]

Ashtekar and J

A. Ashtekar and J. Pullin, eds.,Loop Quantum Gravity: The First 30 Years, vol. 4 of100 Years of General Relativity. World Scientific, 2017

2017
[90]

A short review of loop quantum gravity,

A. Ashtekar and E. Bianchi, “A short review of loop quantum gravity,”Rept. Prog. Phys.84 no. 4, (2021) 042001,arXiv:2104.04394 [gr-qc]

2021 arXiv
[91]

The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,

J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2 (1998) 231–252, arXiv:hep-th/9711200. 445

1998 arXiv
[92]

Introduction to Gauge/Gravity Duality,

J. Polchinski, “Introduction to Gauge/Gravity Duality,” inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: String theory and its Applications: From meV to the Planck Scale, pp. 3–46. 10, 2010. arXiv:1010.6134 [hep-th]

2010 arXiv
[93]

The AdS/CFT Correspondence,

V. E. Hubeny, “The AdS/CFT Correspondence,”Class. Quant. Grav.32 no. 12, (2015) 124010,arXiv:1501.00007 [gr-qc]

2015 arXiv
[94]

TASI lectures on AdS/CFT,

J. Penedones, “TASI lectures on AdS/CFT,” inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: New Frontiers in Fields and Strings, pp. 75–136. 2017.arXiv:1608.04948 [hep-th]

2017 arXiv
[95]

Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities,

R. Penrose, “Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities,”Phys. Rev. Lett.14 (1965) 57–59

1965
[96]

The occurrence of singularities in cosmology. III. Causality and singularities,

S. Hawking, “The occurrence of singularities in cosmology. III. Causality and singularities,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A300 (1967) 187–201

1967
[97]

N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies,Quantum Fields in Curved Space. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 2, 1984

1984
[98]

S. A. Fulling,Aspects of Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space-time, vol. 17. 1989

1989
[99]

R. M. Wald,Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space-Time and Black Hole Thermodynamics. Chicago Lectures in Physics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1995

1995
[100]

Quantum field theory in curved space-time,

L. H. Ford, “Quantum field theory in curved space-time,” in9th Jorge Andre Swieca Summer School: Particles and Fields, pp. 345–388. 7, 1997. arXiv:gr-qc/9707062

1997 arXiv
[101]

Mukhanov and S

V. Mukhanov and S. Winitzki,Introduction to quantum effects in gravity. Cambridge University Press, 6, 2007

2007
[102]

L. E. Parker and D. Toms,Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime: Quantized Field and Gravity. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 8, 2009

2009
[103]

Curvature Squared Terms and String Theories,

B. Zwiebach, “Curvature Squared Terms and String Theories,”Phys. Lett. B 156 (1985) 315–317

1985
[104]

The Quartic Effective Action for the Heterotic String,

D. J. Gross and J. H. Sloan, “The Quartic Effective Action for the Heterotic String,” Nucl. Phys. B291 (1987) 41–89. 446

1987
[105]

Superstring Modifications of Einstein’s Equations,

D. J. Gross and E. Witten, “Superstring Modifications of Einstein’s Equations,” Nucl. Phys. B277 (1986) 1

1986
[106]

Higher-derivative corrected black holes: Perturbative stability and absorption cross-section in heterotic string theory,

F. Moura and R. Schiappa, “Higher-derivative corrected black holes: Perturbative stability and absorption cross-section in heterotic string theory,”Class. Quant. Grav.24 (2007) 361–386, arXiv:hep-th/0605001

2007 arXiv
[107]

String gravity in D=4,

P. A. Cano and A. Ruipérez, “String gravity in D=4,”Phys. Rev. D105 no. 4, (2022) 044022,arXiv:2111.04750 [hep-th]

2022 arXiv
[108]

The Barbero-Immirzi Parameter as a Scalar Field: K-Inflation from Loop Quantum Gravity?,

V. Taveras and N. Yunes, “The Barbero-Immirzi Parameter as a Scalar Field: K-Inflation from Loop Quantum Gravity?,”Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 064070, arXiv:0807.2652 [gr-qc]

2008 arXiv
[109]

Interaction of the Barbero-Immirzi Field with Matter and Pseudo-Scalar Perturbations,

S. Mercuri and V. Taveras, “Interaction of the Barbero-Immirzi Field with Matter and Pseudo-Scalar Perturbations,”Phys. Rev. D80 (2009) 104007, arXiv:0903.4407 [gr-qc]

2009 arXiv
[110]

The Cosmological Constant Problem,

S. Weinberg, “The Cosmological Constant Problem,”Rev. Mod. Phys.61 (1989) 1–23

1989
[111]

Cosmological dynamics: Course 1,

E. Bertschinger, “Cosmological dynamics: Course 1,” inLes Houches Summer School on Cosmology and Large Scale Structure (Session 60), pp. 273–348. 8, 1993.arXiv:astro-ph/9503125

1993 arXiv
[112]

P. J. E. Peebles,Principles of physical cosmology. 1994

1994
[113]

Coles and F

P. Coles and F. Lucchin,Cosmology: The Origin and evolution of cosmic structure. 1995

1995
[114]

A. R. Liddle and D. H. Lyth,Cosmological inflation and large scale structure. 2000

2000
[115]

Mukhanov,Physical Foundations of Cosmology

V. Mukhanov,Physical Foundations of Cosmology. Cambridge University Press, Oxford, 2005

2005
[116]

Weinberg,Cosmology

S. Weinberg,Cosmology. Oxford University Press, 2008

2008
[117]

Maggiore,Gravitational Waves: Volume 2: Astrophysics and Cosmology

M. Maggiore,Gravitational Waves: Volume 2: Astrophysics and Cosmology. Oxford University Press, 03, 2018

2018
[118]

Dodelson and F

S. Dodelson and F. Schmidt,Modern Cosmology. Elsevier Science, 2020

2020
[119]

Cosmology intertwined: A review of the particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology associated with the cosmological tensions and anomalies,

E. Abdallaet al., “Cosmology intertwined: A review of the particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology associated with the cosmological tensions and anomalies,” JHEAp 34 (2022) 49–211, arXiv:2203.06142 [astro-ph.CO] . 447

2022 arXiv
[120]

Anomalies in physical cosmology,

P. J. E. Peebles, “Anomalies in physical cosmology,”Annals Phys.447 (2022) 169159, arXiv:2208.05018 [astro-ph.CO]

2022 arXiv
[121]

Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant,

Supernova Search TeamCollaboration, A. G. Riesset al., “Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant,” Astron. J.116 (1998) 1009–1038, arXiv:astro-ph/9805201

1998 arXiv
[122]

Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 high redshift supernovae,

Supernova Cosmology ProjectCollaboration, S. Perlmutteret al., “Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 high redshift supernovae,”Astrophys. J. 517 (1999) 565–586, arXiv:astro-ph/9812133

1999 arXiv
[123]

Observational Evidence of the Accelerated Expansion of the Universe,

P. Astier and R. Pain, “Observational Evidence of the Accelerated Expansion of the Universe,”Comptes Rendus Physique13 (2012) 521–538, arXiv:1204.5493 [astro-ph.CO]

2012 arXiv
[124]

Die Rotverschiebung von extragalaktischen Nebeln,

F. Zwicky, “Die Rotverschiebung von extragalaktischen Nebeln,”Helvetica Physica Acta6 (1933) 110–127

1933
[125]

Existence and Nature of Dark Matter in the Universe,

V. Trimble, “Existence and Nature of Dark Matter in the Universe,”Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.25 (1987) 425–472

1987
[126]

History of dark matter,

G. Bertone and D. Hooper, “History of dark matter,”Rev. Mod. Phys.90 no. 4, (2018) 045002,arXiv:1605.04909 [astro-ph.CO]

2018 arXiv
[127]

The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,

A. H. Guth, “The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,”Phys. Rev. D23 (1981) 347–356

1981
[128]

A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,

A. A. Starobinsky, “A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,”Phys. Lett. B91 (1980) 99–102

1980
[129]

First Order Phase Transition of a Vacuum and Expansion of the Universe,

K. Sato, “First Order Phase Transition of a Vacuum and Expansion of the Universe,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.195 (1981) 467–479

1981
[130]

Quantum Fluctuations and a Nonsingular Universe,

V. F. Mukhanov and G. V. Chibisov, “Quantum Fluctuations and a Nonsingular Universe,”JETP Lett.33 (1981) 532–535

1981
[131]

A Critical Review of Classical Bouncing Cosmologies,

D. Battefeld and P. Peter, “A Critical Review of Classical Bouncing Cosmologies,” Phys. Rept.571 (2015) 1–66, arXiv:1406.2790 [astro-ph.CO]

2015 arXiv
[132]

Bouncing Cosmologies: Progress and Problems,

R. Brandenberger and P. Peter, “Bouncing Cosmologies: Progress and Problems,” Found. Phys.47 no. 6, (2017) 797–850,arXiv:1603.05834 [hep-th]

2017 arXiv
[133]

Bouncing Cosmology made simple,

A. Ijjas and P. J. Steinhardt, “Bouncing Cosmology made simple,”Class. Quant. Grav.35 no. 13, (2018) 135004,arXiv:1803.01961 [astro-ph.CO] . 448

2018 arXiv
[134]

Introductory review of cosmic inflation,

S. Tsujikawa, “Introductory review of cosmic inflation,” in2nd Tah Poe School on Cosmology: Modern Cosmology. 4, 2003. arXiv:hep-ph/0304257

2003 arXiv
[135]

The Effective Field Theory of Inflation,

C. Cheung, P. Creminelli, A. L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan, and L. Senatore, “The Effective Field Theory of Inflation,”JHEP 03 (2008) 014, arXiv:0709.0293 [hep-th]

2008 arXiv
[136]

D. S. Gorbunov and V. A. Rubakov,Introduction to the theory of the early universe: Cosmological perturbations and inflationary theory. 2011

2011
[137]

V. A. Rubakov and D. S. Gorbunov,Introduction to the Theory of the Early Universe: Hot big bang theory. World Scientific, Singapore, 2017

2017
[138]

Inflationary cosmology: from theory to observations,

J. A. Vázquez, L. E. Padilla, and T. Matos, “Inflationary cosmology: from theory to observations,”Rev. Mex. Fis. E17 no. 1, (2020) 73–91, arXiv:1810.09934 [astro-ph.CO]

2020 arXiv
[139]

Dynamical dark energy in light of the latest observations,

G.-B. Zhaoet al., “Dynamical dark energy in light of the latest observations,” Nature Astron.1 no. 9, (2017) 627–632,arXiv:1701.08165 [astro-ph.CO]

2017 arXiv
[140]

The Expansion of the Universe is Faster than Expected,

A. G. Riess, “The Expansion of the Universe is Faster than Expected,” Nature Rev. Phys.2 no. 1, (2019) 10–12,arXiv:2001.03624 [astro-ph.CO]

2019 arXiv
[141]

Hubble constant hunter’s guide,

L. Knox and M. Millea, “Hubble constant hunter’s guide,”Phys. Rev. D101 no. 4, (2020) 043533,arXiv:1908.03663 [astro-ph.CO]

2020 arXiv
[142]

Cosmology intertwined III:fσ 8 and S8,

E. Di Valentinoet al., “Cosmology intertwined III:fσ 8 and S8,” Astropart. Phys. 131 (2021) 102604, arXiv:2008.11285 [astro-ph.CO]

2021 arXiv
[143]

Snowmass2021 - Letter of interest cosmology intertwined II: The hubble constant tension,

E. Di Valentinoet al., “Snowmass2021 - Letter of interest cosmology intertwined II: The hubble constant tension,”Astropart. Phys.131 (2021) 102605, arXiv:2008.11284 [astro-ph.CO]

2021 arXiv
[144]

In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions,

E. Di Valentino, O. Mena, S. Pan, L. Visinelli, W. Yang, A. Melchiorri, D. F. Mota, A. G. Riess, and J. Silk, “In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions,”Class. Quant. Grav.38 no. 15, (2021) 153001, arXiv:2103.01183 [astro-ph.CO]

2021 arXiv
[145]

Challenges forΛCDM: An update,

L. Perivolaropoulos and F. Skara, “Challenges forΛCDM: An update,” arXiv:2105.05208 [astro-ph.CO]

arXiv
[146]

Hubble Tension: The Evidence of New Physics,

J.-P. Hu and F.-Y. Wang, “Hubble Tension: The Evidence of New Physics,” Universe 9 no. 2, (2023) 94,arXiv:2302.05709 [astro-ph.CO]

2023 arXiv
[147]

Classical and Quantum Cosmology of the Starobinsky Inflationary Model,

A. Vilenkin, “Classical and Quantum Cosmology of the Starobinsky Inflationary Model,”Phys. Rev. D32 (1985) 2511. 449

1985
[148]

Dynamics of dark energy,

E. J. Copeland, M. Sami, and S. Tsujikawa, “Dynamics of dark energy,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. D15 (2006) 1753–1936, arXiv:hep-th/0603057

2006 arXiv
[149]

Introduction to modified gravity and gravitational alternative for dark energy,

S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, “Introduction to modified gravity and gravitational alternative for dark energy,”eConf C0602061 (2006) 06, arXiv:hep-th/0601213

2006 arXiv
[150]

Unified cosmic history in modified gravity: from F(R) theory to Lorentz non-invariant models,

S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, “Unified cosmic history in modified gravity: from F(R) theory to Lorentz non-invariant models,”Phys. Rept.505 (2011) 59–144, arXiv:1011.0544 [gr-qc]

2011 arXiv
[151]

Modified Gravity and Cosmology,

T. Clifton, P. G. Ferreira, A. Padilla, and C. Skordis, “Modified Gravity and Cosmology,”Phys. Rept.513 (2012) 1–189, arXiv:1106.2476 [astro-ph.CO]

2012 arXiv
[152]

Theoretical Aspects of Massive Gravity,

K. Hinterbichler, “Theoretical Aspects of Massive Gravity,”Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 (2012) 671–710, arXiv:1105.3735 [hep-th]

2012 arXiv
[153]

Faraoni and S

V. Faraoni and S. Capozziello,Beyond Einstein Gravity. Springer, 2011

2011
[154]

Massive Gravity,

C. de Rham, “Massive Gravity,”Living Rev. Rel.17 (2014) 7, arXiv:1401.4173 [hep-th]

2014 arXiv
[155]

Inflationary cosmology in modified gravity theories,

K. Bamba and S. D. Odintsov, “Inflationary cosmology in modified gravity theories,” Symmetry 7 no. 1, (2015) 220–240,arXiv:1503.00442 [hep-th]

2015 arXiv
[156]

f(T) teleparallel gravity and cosmology,

Y.-F. Cai, S. Capozziello, M. De Laurentis, and E. N. Saridakis, “f(T) teleparallel gravity and cosmology,”Rept. Prog. Phys.79 no. 10, (2016) 106901, arXiv:1511.07586 [gr-qc]

2016 arXiv
[157]

Modified Gravity Theories on a Nutshell: Inflation, Bounce and Late-time Evolution,

S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and V. K. Oikonomou, “Modified Gravity Theories on a Nutshell: Inflation, Bounce and Late-time Evolution,”Phys. Rept.692 (2017) 1–104, arXiv:1705.11098 [gr-qc]

2017 arXiv
[158]

Cosmology in scalar-vector-tensor theories,

L. Heisenberg, R. Kase, and S. Tsujikawa, “Cosmology in scalar-vector-tensor theories,”Phys. Rev. D98 no. 2, (2018) 024038, arXiv:1805.01066 [gr-qc]

2018 arXiv
[159]

A systematic approach to generalisations of General Relativity and their cosmological implications,

L. Heisenberg, “A systematic approach to generalisations of General Relativity and their cosmological implications,”Phys. Rept.796 (2019) 1–113, arXiv:1807.01725 [gr-qc]

2019 arXiv
[160]

Modified Gravity and Cosmology: An Update by the CANTATA Network,

E. N. Saridakis, R. Lazkoz, V. Salzano, P. Vargas Moniz, S. Capozziello, J. Beltrán Jiménez, M. De Laurentis, and G. J. Olmo, “Modified Gravity and Cosmology: An Update by the CANTATA Network,” 2023. 450

2023
[161]

Papantonopoulos, ed.,Modifications of Einstein’s Theory of Gravity at Large Distances

E. Papantonopoulos, ed.,Modifications of Einstein’s Theory of Gravity at Large Distances. Springer Cham, 2014

2014
[162]

Dark Energy Versus Modified Gravity,

A. Joyce, L. Lombriser, and F. Schmidt, “Dark Energy Versus Modified Gravity,”Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.66 (2016) 95–122, arXiv:1601.06133 [astro-ph.CO]

2016 arXiv
[163]

A. N. Petrov, S. M. Kopeikin, R. R. Lompay, and B. Tekin,Metric Theories of Gravity: Perturbations and conservation laws. De Gruyter, Berlin, Boston, 2017

2017
[164]

Doppelgänger dark energy: modified gravity with non-universal couplings after GW170817,

L. Amendola, D. Bettoni, G. Domènech, and A. R. Gomes, “Doppelgänger dark energy: modified gravity with non-universal couplings after GW170817,” JCAP 06 (2018) 029, arXiv:1803.06368 [gr-qc]

2018 arXiv
[165]

Cosmology in f(Q) geometry,

J. Beltrán Jiménez, L. Heisenberg, T. S. Koivisto, and S. Pekar, “Cosmology in f(Q) geometry,”Phys. Rev. D101 no. 10, (2020) 103507, arXiv:1906.10027 [gr-qc]

2020 arXiv
[166]

Modified theories of gravity: Why, how and what?,

S. Shankaranarayanan and J. P. Johnson, “Modified theories of gravity: Why, how and what?,”Gen. Rel. Grav.54 no. 5, (2022) 44, arXiv:2204.06533 [gr-qc]

2022 arXiv
[167]

Review onf(Q) Gravity,

L. Heisenberg, “Review onf(Q) Gravity,” arXiv:2309.15958 [gr-qc]

arXiv
[168]

Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,

LIGO Scientific, VirgoCollaboration, B. P. Abbottet al., “Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 no. 6, (2016) 061102,arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

2016 arXiv
[169]

GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs,

LIGO Scientific, VirgoCollaboration, B. P. Abbottet al., “GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs,”Phys. Rev. X9 no. 3, (2019) 031040,arXiv:1811.12907 [astro-ph.HE]

2019 arXiv
[170]

GWTC-2.1: Deep Extended Catalog of Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run,

LIGO Scientific, VIRGOCollaboration, R. Abbottet al., “GWTC-2.1: Deep Extended Catalog of Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run,” arXiv:2108.01045 [gr-qc]

arXiv
[171]

GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run,

LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRACollaboration, R. Abbottet al., “GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run,”arXiv:2111.03606 [gr-qc]. 451

arXiv
[172]

Open Data from the Third Observing Run of LIGO, Virgo, KAGRA, and GEO,

KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO ScientificCollaboration, R. Abbottet al., “Open Data from the Third Observing Run of LIGO, Virgo, KAGRA, and GEO,” Astrophys. J. Suppl.267 no. 2, (2023) 29,arXiv:2302.03676 [gr-qc]

2023 arXiv
[173]

The science case for LIGO-India,

M. Saleemet al., “The science case for LIGO-India,”Class. Quant. Grav.39 no. 2, (2022) 025004,arXiv:2105.01716 [gr-qc]

2022 arXiv
[174]

The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background,

NANOGrav Collaboration, G. Agazieet al., “The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background,”Astrophys. J. Lett.951 no. 1, (2023) L8,arXiv:2306.16213 [astro-ph.HE]

2023 arXiv
[175]

The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - III. Search for gravitational wave signals,

EPTA, InPTA:Collaboration, J. Antoniadiset al., “The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - III. Search for gravitational wave signals,”Astron. Astrophys.678 (2023) A50, arXiv:2306.16214 [astro-ph.HE]

2023 arXiv
[176]

Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array,

D. J. Reardonet al., “Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array,”Astrophys. J. Lett.951 no. 1, (2023) L6, arXiv:2306.16215 [astro-ph.HE]

2023 arXiv
[177]

Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I,

H. Xuet al., “Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I,”Res. Astron. Astrophys.23 no. 7, (2023) 075024,arXiv:2306.16216 [astro-ph.HE]

2023 arXiv
[178]

The Taiji Program in Space for gravitational wave physics and the nature of gravity,

W.-R. Hu and Y.-L. Wu, “The Taiji Program in Space for gravitational wave physics and the nature of gravity,”National Science Review4 no. 5, (2017) 685–686

2017
[179]

TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector,

L. Junet al., “TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector,” Classical and Quantum Gravity33 no. 3, (2016) 035010

2016
[180]

Sub-Femto-g Free Fall for Space-Based Gravitational Wave Observatories: LISA Pathfinder Results,

M. Armano, H. Audley, G. Auger, J. T. Baird, M. Bassan, P. Binetruy, M. Born, D. Bortoluzzi, N. Brandt, M. Caleno, L. Carbone, A. Cavalleri, A. Cesarini, G. Ciani, G. Congedo, A. M. Cruise, K. Danzmann, M. de Deus Silva, R. De Rosa, M. Diaz-Aguiló, L. Di Fiore, I. Diepholz, G....

2016
[181]

Laser Interferometer Space Antenna,

P. Amaro-Seoane, H. Audley, S. Babak, J. Baker, E. Barausse, P. Bender, E. Berti, P. Binetruy, M. Born, D. Bortoluzzi, J. Camp, C. Caprini, V. Cardoso, M. Colpi, J. Conklin, N. Cornish, C. Cutler, K. Danzmann, R. Dolesi, L. Ferraioli, V. Ferroni, E. Fitzsimons, J. Gair, L. G. ...

arXiv
[182]

The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory,

M. Punturoet al., “The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory,”Class. Quant. Grav.27 (2010) 194002

2010
[183]

Science Case for the Einstein Telescope,

M. Maggioreet al., “Science Case for the Einstein Telescope,”JCAP 03 (2020) 050, arXiv:1912.02622 [astro-ph.CO]

2020 arXiv
[184]

Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO,

D. Reitzeet al., “Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO,”Bull. Am. Astron. Soc.51 no. 7, (2019) 035,arXiv:1907.04833 [astro-ph.IM]

2019 arXiv
[185]

A Horizon Study for Cosmic Explorer: Science, Observatories, and Community,

M. Evanset al., “A Horizon Study for Cosmic Explorer: Science, Observatories, and Community,”arXiv:2109.09882 [astro-ph.IM] . 453

arXiv
[186]

An Overview of gravitational wave sources,

C. Cutler and K. S. Thorne, “An Overview of gravitational wave sources,” in 16th International Conference on General Relativity and Gravitation (GR16), pp. 72–111. 2013.arXiv:gr-qc/0204090

2013 arXiv
[187]

J. D. E. Creighton and W. G. Anderson,Gravitational-wave physics and astronomy: An introduction to theory, experiment and data analysis. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd, 2011

2011
[188]

Fundamental Theoretical Bias in Gravitational Wave Astrophysics and the Parameterized Post-Einsteinian Framework,

N. Yunes and F. Pretorius, “Fundamental Theoretical Bias in Gravitational Wave Astrophysics and the Parameterized Post-Einsteinian Framework,” Phys. Rev. D80 (2009) 122003, arXiv:0909.3328 [gr-qc]

2009 arXiv
[189]

An effective formalism for testing extensions to General Relativity with gravitational waves,

S. Endlich, V. Gorbenko, J. Huang, and L. Senatore, “An effective formalism for testing extensions to General Relativity with gravitational waves,”JHEP 09 (2017) 122, arXiv:1704.01590 [gr-qc]

2017 arXiv
[190]

Gravity and Scalar Fields,

T. P. Sotiriou, “Gravity and Scalar Fields,” inModifications of Einstein’s Theory of Gravity at Large Distances, E. Papantonopoulos, ed., pp. 3–24. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2015

2015
[191]

Gravitational Radiation in the Limit of High Frequency. I. The Linear Approximation and Geometrical Optics,

R. A. Isaacson, “Gravitational Radiation in the Limit of High Frequency. I. The Linear Approximation and Geometrical Optics,”Phys. Rev.166 (Feb,
[192]

Gravitational Radiation in the Limit of High Frequency. II. Nonlinear Terms and the Effective Stress Tensor,

R. A. Isaacson, “Gravitational Radiation in the Limit of High Frequency. II. Nonlinear Terms and the Effective Stress Tensor,”Phys. Rev.166 (Feb,
[193]

Radiation of gravitational waves by a cluster of superdense stars,

Y. B. Zel’dovich and A. G. Polnarev, “Radiation of gravitational waves by a cluster of superdense stars,”Sov. Astron.18 (1974) 17

1974
[194]

Nonlinear nature of gravitation and gravitational wave experiments,

D. Christodoulou, “Nonlinear nature of gravitation and gravitational wave experiments,” Phys. Rev. Lett.67 (1991) 1486–1489

1991
[195]

Geodesic deviation at null infinity and the physical effects of very long wave gravitational radiation,

M. Ludvigsen, “Geodesic deviation at null infinity and the physical effects of very long wave gravitational radiation,”General Relativity and Gravitation 21 (1989) 1205–1212

1989
[196]

Hereditary effects in gravitational radiation,

L. Blanchet and T. Damour, “Hereditary effects in gravitational radiation,” Phys. Rev. D46 (1992) 4304–4319

1992
[197]

Gravitational-wave bursts with memory: The Christodoulou effect,

K. S. Thorne, “Gravitational-wave bursts with memory: The Christodoulou effect,” Phys. Rev. D45 no. 2, (1992) 520–524. 454

1992
[198]

Christodoulou’s nonlinear gravitational-wave memory: Evaluation in the quadrupole approximation,

A. G. Wiseman and C. M. Will, “Christodoulou’s nonlinear gravitational-wave memory: Evaluation in the quadrupole approximation,” Phys. Rev. D44 (Nov, 1991) R2945–R2949

1991
[199]

Post-Newtonian corrections to the gravitational-wave memory for quasi-circular, inspiralling compact binaries,

M. Favata, “Post-Newtonian corrections to the gravitational-wave memory for quasi-circular, inspiralling compact binaries,”Phys. Rev. D80 (2009) 024002, arXiv:0812.0069 [gr-qc]

2009 arXiv
[200]

Nonlinear gravitational-wave memory from binary black hole mergers,

M. Favata, “Nonlinear gravitational-wave memory from binary black hole mergers,” Astrophys. J. Lett.696 (2009) L159–L162, arXiv:0902.3660 [astro-ph.SR]

2009 arXiv
[201]

The gravitational-wave memory effect,

M. Favata, “The gravitational-wave memory effect,”Class. Quant. Grav.27 (2010) 084036, arXiv:1003.3486 [gr-qc]

2010 arXiv
[202]

Perturbative and gauge invariant treatment of gravitational wave memory,

L. Bieri and D. Garfinkle, “Perturbative and gauge invariant treatment of gravitational wave memory,”Phys. Rev. D89 no. 8, (2014) 084039, arXiv:1312.6871 [gr-qc]

2014 arXiv
[203]

Gravitational Memory, BMS Supertranslations and Soft Theorems,

A. Strominger and A. Zhiboedov, “Gravitational Memory, BMS Supertranslations and Soft Theorems,”JHEP 01 (2016) 086, arXiv:1411.5745 [hep-th]

2016 arXiv
[204]

Gravitational wave memory and the wave equation,

D. Garfinkle, “Gravitational wave memory and the wave equation,”Class. Quant. Grav.39 no. 13, (2022) 135010,arXiv:2201.05543 [gr-qc]

2022 arXiv
[205]

Gravitational-wave memory and pulsar timing arrays,

R. van Haasteren and Y. Levin, “Gravitational-wave memory and pulsar timing arrays,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.401 (2010) 2372, arXiv:0909.0954 [astro-ph.IM]

2010 arXiv
[206]

Prospects of detecting the nonlinear gravitational wave memory,

A. D. Johnson, S. J. Kapadia, A. Osborne, A. Hixon, and D. Kennefick, “Prospects of detecting the nonlinear gravitational wave memory,”Phys. Rev. D99 no. 4, (2019) 044045,arXiv:1810.09563 [gr-qc]

2019 arXiv
[207]

Testing Gravitational Memory Generation with Compact Binary Mergers,

H. Yang and D. Martynov, “Testing Gravitational Memory Generation with Compact Binary Mergers,”Phys. Rev. Lett.121 no. 7, (2018) 071102, arXiv:1803.02429 [gr-qc]

2018 arXiv
[208]

Prospects for Memory Detection with Low-Frequency Gravitational Wave Detectors,

K. Islo, J. Simon, S. Burke-Spolaor, and X. Siemens, “Prospects for Memory Detection with Low-Frequency Gravitational Wave Detectors,” arXiv:1906.11936 [astro-ph.HE]

1906 arXiv
[209]

Climbing up the memory staircase: Equatorial zoom-whirl orbits,

L. M. Burko and G. Khanna, “Climbing up the memory staircase: Equatorial zoom-whirl orbits,”Phys. Rev. D102 no. 8, (2020) 084035, arXiv:2007.12545 [gr-qc] . 455

2020 arXiv
[210]

Survey of gravitational wave memory in intermediate mass ratio binaries,

T. Islam, S. E. Field, G. Khanna, and N. Warburton, “Survey of gravitational wave memory in intermediate mass ratio binaries,” arXiv:2109.00754 [gr-qc]

arXiv
[211]

Detecting the gravitational wave memory effect with TianQin,

S. Sun, C. Shi, J.-d. Zhang, and J. Mei, “Detecting the gravitational wave memory effect with TianQin,”Phys. Rev. D107 no. 4, (2023) 044023, arXiv:2207.13009 [gr-qc]

2023 arXiv
[212]

New horizons for fundamental physics with LISA,

LISA Collaboration, K. G. Arunet al., “New horizons for fundamental physics with LISA,”Living Rev. Rel.25 no. 1, (2022) 4,arXiv:2205.01597 [gr-qc]

2022 arXiv
[213]

Can gravitational-wave memory help constrain binary black-hole parameters? A LISA case study,

S. Gasparotto, R. Vicente, D. Blas, A. C. Jenkins, and E. Barausse, “Can gravitational-wave memory help constrain binary black-hole parameters? A LISA case study,”Phys. Rev. D107 no. 12, (2023) 124033, arXiv:2301.13228 [gr-qc]

2023 arXiv
[214]

Detection of the gravitational memory effect in LISA using triggers from ground-based detectors,

S. Ghosh, A. Weaver, J. Sanjuan, P. Fulda, and G. Mueller, “Detection of the gravitational memory effect in LISA using triggers from ground-based detectors,” Phys. Rev. D107 no. 8, (2023) 084051,arXiv:2302.04396 [gr-qc]

2023 arXiv
[215]

Inferring fundamental spacetime symmetries with gravitational-wave memory: from LISA to the Einstein Telescope,

B. Goncharov, L. Donnay, and J. Harms, “Inferring fundamental spacetime symmetries with gravitational-wave memory: from LISA to the Einstein Telescope,” arXiv:2310.10718 [gr-qc]

arXiv
[216]

Detecting gravitational-wave memory with LIGO: implications of GW150914,

P. D. Lasky, E. Thrane, Y. Levin, J. Blackman, and Y. Chen, “Detecting gravitational-wave memory with LIGO: implications of GW150914,”Phys. Rev. Lett.117 no. 6, (2016) 061102,arXiv:1605.01415 [astro-ph.HE]

2016 arXiv
[217]

Forecasts for detecting the gravitational-wave memory effect with Advanced LIGO and Virgo,

O. M. Boersma, D. A. Nichols, and P. Schmidt, “Forecasts for detecting the gravitational-wave memory effect with Advanced LIGO and Virgo,”Phys. Rev. D101 no. 8, (2020) 083026,arXiv:2002.01821 [astro-ph.HE]

2020 arXiv
[218]

Outlook for detecting the gravitational-wave displacement and spin memory effects with current and future gravitational-wave detectors,

A. M. Grant and D. A. Nichols, “Outlook for detecting the gravitational-wave displacement and spin memory effects with current and future gravitational-wave detectors,”Phys. Rev. D107 no. 6, (2023) 064056, arXiv:2210.16266 [gr-qc] . [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 108, 029901 (2023)]

2023 arXiv
[219]

Measuring gravitational-wave memory in the first LIGO/Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalog,

M. Hübner, C. Talbot, P. D. Lasky, and E. Thrane, “Measuring gravitational-wave memory in the first LIGO/Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalog,”Phys. Rev. D101 no. 2, (2020) 023011, arXiv:1911.12496 [astro-ph.HE] . 456

2020 arXiv
[220]

Search for nonlinear memory from subsolar mass compact binary mergers,

M. Ebersold and S. Tiwari, “Search for nonlinear memory from subsolar mass compact binary mergers,”Phys. Rev. D101 no. 10, (2020) 104041, arXiv:2005.03306 [gr-qc]

2020 arXiv
[221]

Memory remains undetected: Updates from the second LIGO/Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalog,

M. Hübner, P. Lasky, and E. Thrane, “Memory remains undetected: Updates from the second LIGO/Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalog,” Phys. Rev. D104 no. 2, (2021) 023004,arXiv:2105.02879 [gr-qc]

2021 arXiv
[222]

Quantum theory of gravitation,

R. P. Feynman, “Quantum theory of gravitation,”Acta Phys. Polon.24 (1963) 697–722

1963
[223]

Photons and Gravitons inS-Matrix Theory: Derivation of Charge Conservation and Equality of Gravitational and Inertial Mass,

S. Weinberg, “Photons and Gravitons inS-Matrix Theory: Derivation of Charge Conservation and Equality of Gravitational and Inertial Mass,”Phys. Rev.135 (1964) B1049–B1056

1964
[224]

Photons and gravitons in perturbation theory: Derivation of Maxwell’s and Einstein’s equations,

S. Weinberg, “Photons and gravitons in perturbation theory: Derivation of Maxwell’s and Einstein’s equations,”Phys. Rev.138 (1965) B988–B1002

1965
[225]

Quantum Theory of Gravity. 2. The Manifestly Covariant Theory,

B. S. DeWitt, “Quantum Theory of Gravity. 2. The Manifestly Covariant Theory,”Phys. Rev.162 (1967) 1195–1239

1967
[226]

Selfinteraction and gauge invariance,

S. Deser, “Selfinteraction and gauge invariance,”Gen. Rel. Grav.1 (1970) 9–18, arXiv:gr-qc/0411023

1970 arXiv
[227]

Classical general relativity derived from quantum gravity,

D. G. Boulware and S. Deser, “Classical general relativity derived from quantum gravity,”Annals of Physics89 no. 1, (1975) 193–240

1975
[228]

Gravitation and Electromagnetism,

S. N. Gupta, “Gravitation and Electromagnetism,”Phys. Rev.96 (Dec,
[229]

One loop divergencies in the theory of gravitation,

G. ’t Hooft and M. J. G. Veltman, “One loop divergencies in the theory of gravitation,” Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor. A20 (1974) 69–94

1974
[230]

Leading quantum correction to the Newtonian potential,

J. F. Donoghue, “Leading quantum correction to the Newtonian potential,” Phys. Rev. Lett.72 (1994) 2996–2999, arXiv:gr-qc/9310024

1994 arXiv
[231]

General relativity as an effective field theory: The leading quantum corrections,

J. F. Donoghue, “General relativity as an effective field theory: The leading quantum corrections,”Phys. Rev. D50 (1994) 3874–3888, arXiv:gr-qc/9405057

1994 arXiv
[232]

Calculation of graviton scattering amplitudes using string based methods,

D. C. Dunbar and P. S. Norridge, “Calculation of graviton scattering amplitudes using string based methods,”Nucl. Phys. B433 (1995) 181–208, arXiv:hep-th/9408014

1995 arXiv
[233]

Introduction to the effective field theory description of gravity,

J. F. Donoghue, “Introduction to the effective field theory description of gravity,” inAdvanced School on Effective Theories. 6, 1995. arXiv:gr-qc/9512024. 457

1995 arXiv
[234]

R. P. Feynman,Feynman lectures on gravitation. 1996

1996
[235]

Weinberg,The Quantum theory of fields

S. Weinberg,The Quantum theory of fields. Vol. 1: Foundations. Cambridge University Press, 6, 2005

2005
[236]

Quantum gravitational corrections to the nonrelativistic scattering potential of two masses,

N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, J. F. Donoghue, and B. R. Holstein, “Quantum gravitational corrections to the nonrelativistic scattering potential of two masses,” Phys. Rev. D67 (2003) 084033, arXiv:hep-th/0211072. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 71, 069903 (2005)]

2003 arXiv
[237]

Quantum power correction to the Newton law,

I. B. Khriplovich and G. G. Kirilin, “Quantum power correction to the Newton law,”J. Exp. Theor. Phys.95 no. 6, (2002) 981–986, arXiv:gr-qc/0207118

2002 arXiv
[238]

Quantum gravity in everyday life: General relativity as an effective field theory,

C. P. Burgess, “Quantum gravity in everyday life: General relativity as an effective field theory,”Living Rev. Rel.7 (2004) 5–56, arXiv:gr-qc/0311082

2004 arXiv
[239]

Zee,Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell: Second Edition

A. Zee,Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell: Second Edition. Princeton University Press, 2010

2010
[240]

The effective field theory treatment of quantum gravity,

J. F. Donoghue, “The effective field theory treatment of quantum gravity,” AIP Conf. Proc.1483 no. 1, (2012) 73–94,arXiv:1209.3511 [gr-qc]

2012 arXiv
[241]

Gravitational wave memory beyond general relativity,

L. Heisenberg, N. Yunes, and J. Zosso, “Gravitational wave memory beyond general relativity,”Phys. Rev. D108 no. 2, (2023) 024010, arXiv:2303.02021 [gr-qc]

2023 arXiv
[242]

On the electrodynamics of moving bodies,

A. Einstein, “On the electrodynamics of moving bodies,”Annalen Phys.17 (1905) 891–921

1905
[243]

Sur la dynamique de l’électron,

H. Poincaré, “Sur la dynamique de l’électron,”Rendiconti del circolo matematico di Palermo21 (1906) 129–176

1906
[244]

Raum und Zeit,

H. Minkowski, “Raum und Zeit,”Physikalische Zeitschrift10 (1909) 104–111

1909
[245]

Invariant Variation Problems,

E. Noether, “Invariant Variation Problems,”Gott. Nachr.1918 (1918) 235–257, arXiv:physics/0503066

1918 arXiv
[246]

On the current and the density of the electric charge, the energy, the linear momentum and the angular momentum of arbitrary fields,

F. J. Belinfante, “On the current and the density of the electric charge, the energy, the linear momentum and the angular momentum of arbitrary fields,” Physica7 no. 5, (May, 1940) 449–474

1940
[247]

The energy–momentum tensor(s) in classical gauge theories,

D. N. Blaschke, F. Gieres, M. Reboud, and M. Schweda, “The energy–momentum tensor(s) in classical gauge theories,”Nucl. Phys. B912 (2016) 192–223, arXiv:1605.01121 [hep-th] . 458

2016 arXiv
[248]

Newton, A

I. Newton, A. Motte, and J. Machin,The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. No. Bd. 1. B. Motte, 1729
[249]

Über das Relativitätsprinzip und die aus demselben gezogenen Folgerungen,

A. Einstein, “Über das Relativitätsprinzip und die aus demselben gezogenen Folgerungen,”Jahrbuch der Radioaktivität4 (1907) 411–462

1907
[250]

A modified equation of geodesic deviation,

D. E. Hodgkinson, “A modified equation of geodesic deviation,”General Relativity and Gravitation3 (1972) 351–375

1972
[251]

Levi-Civita,Nozione di parallelismo in una varietà qualunque e conseguente specificazione geometrica della curvatura Riemanniana: memoria

T. Levi-Civita,Nozione di parallelismo in una varietà qualunque e conseguente specificazione geometrica della curvatura Riemanniana: memoria. Circolo matematico di Palermo, 1917

1917
[252]

Petersen,Riemannian geometry, vol

P. Petersen,Riemannian geometry, vol. 171 ofGrad. Texts Math.Cham: Springer, 3rd edition ed., 2016

2016
[253]

M. P. do Carmo,Riemannian geometry. Translated from the Portuguese by Francis Flaherty. Boston, MA etc.: Birkhäuser, 1992

1992
[254]

A Metric Theory of Gravitation Without Minimal Coupling of Matter and Gravitational Field,

H. Gonner, “A Metric Theory of Gravitation Without Minimal Coupling of Matter and Gravitational Field,”Z. Naturforsch. A31 (1976) 1451–1456

1976
[255]

From gravitons to gravity: Myths and reality,

T. Padmanabhan, “From gravitons to gravity: Myths and reality,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. D17 (2008) 367–398, arXiv:gr-qc/0409089

2008 arXiv
[256]

Conservation Laws in General Relativity,

A. Trautman, “Conservation Laws in General Relativity,” inGravitation: an Introduction to Current Research, L. Witten, ed., ch. 5, pp. 169–198. Physics Today, London, 1963

1963
[257]

The uniqueness of the Einstein field equations in a four-dimensional space,

D. Lovelock, “The uniqueness of the Einstein field equations in a four-dimensional space,”Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis33 no. 1, (1969) 54–70

1969
[258]

Lovelock’s theorem revisited,

A. Navarro and J. Navarro, “Lovelock’s theorem revisited,”J. Geom. Phys. 61 (2011) 1950–1956, arXiv:1005.2386 [math-ph]

2011 arXiv
[259]

From Lovelock to Horndeski‘s Generalized Scalar Tensor Theory,

C. Charmousis, “From Lovelock to Horndeski‘s Generalized Scalar Tensor Theory,”Lect. Notes Phys.892 (2015) 25–56, arXiv:1405.1612 [gr-qc]

2015 arXiv
[260]

Hamiltonsches Prinzip und allgemeine Relativitätstheorie,

A. Einstein, “Hamiltonsches Prinzip und allgemeine Relativitätstheorie,” Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.)(1916) 1111–1116

1916
[261]

The fourth-order gravitational action for manifolds with boundaries,

N. H. Barth, “The fourth-order gravitational action for manifolds with boundaries,” Classical and Quantum Gravity2 no. 4, (Jul, 1985) 497

1985
[262]

S. W. Hawking and W. Israel,General Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey. Univ. Pr., Cambridge, UK, 1979. 459

1979
[263]

The Gravitational equations and the problem of motion,

A. Einstein, L. Infeld, and B. Hoffmann, “The Gravitational equations and the problem of motion,”Annals Math.39 (1938) 65–100

1938
[264]

The problem of motion in Newtonian and Einsteinian gravity,

T. Damour, “The problem of motion in Newtonian and Einsteinian gravity,” in 300 Years of Gravity: A Conference to Mark the 300th Anniversary of the Publication of Newton’s Principia. 6, 1986

1986
[265]

Equivalence Principle Implications of Modified Gravity Models,

L. Hui, A. Nicolis, and C. Stubbs, “Equivalence Principle Implications of Modified Gravity Models,”Phys. Rev. D80 (2009) 104002, arXiv:0905.2966 [astro-ph.CO]

2009 arXiv
[266]

Nordstrom’s scalar theory of gravity and the equivalence principle,

N. Deruelle, “Nordstrom’s scalar theory of gravity and the equivalence principle,” Gen. Rel. Grav.43 (2011) 3337–3354, arXiv:1104.4608 [gr-qc]

2011 arXiv
[267]

Group Theoretical Discussion of Relativistic Wave Equations,

V. Bargmann and E. P. Wigner, “Group Theoretical Discussion of Relativistic Wave Equations,”Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.34 (1948) 211

1948
[268]

Maggiore,A Modern introduction to quantum field theory

M. Maggiore,A Modern introduction to quantum field theory. Oxford Univ., 2005

2005
[269]

M. D. Schwartz,Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model. Cambridge University Press, 3, 2014

2014
[270]

GR uniqueness and deformations,

K. Krasnov, “GR uniqueness and deformations,”JHEP 10 (2015) 037, arXiv:1410.8006 [hep-th]

2015 arXiv
[271]

Uniqueness from gauge invariance and the Adler zero,

L. Rodina, “Uniqueness from gauge invariance and the Adler zero,”JHEP 09 (2019) 084, arXiv:1612.06342 [hep-th]

2019 arXiv
[272]

Generalized Hamiltonian dynamics,

P. A. M. Dirac, “Generalized Hamiltonian dynamics,”Can. J. Math.2 (1950) 129–148

1950
[273]

Constraints in covariant field theories,

J. L. Anderson and P. G. Bergmann, “Constraints in covariant field theories,” Phys. Rev.83 (1951) 1018–1025

1951
[274]

Local symmetries and constraints,

J. Lee and R. M. Wald, “Local symmetries and constraints,”J. Math. Phys. 31 (1990) 725–743

1990
[275]

P. A. M. Dirac,Lectures on Quantum Mechanics. Dover Publications, 1964

1964
[276]

On the Role of Constraints and Degrees of Freedom in the Hamiltonian Formalism,

A. Golovnev, “On the Role of Constraints and Degrees of Freedom in the Hamiltonian Formalism,”Universe 9 no. 2, (2023) 101,arXiv:2212.11260 [hep-th]. 460

2023 arXiv
[277]

Dynamical Structure and Definition of Energy in General Relativity,

R. Arnowitt, S. Deser, and C. W. Misner, “Dynamical Structure and Definition of Energy in General Relativity,”Phys. Rev.116 (Dec, 1959) 1322–1330

1959
[278]

The Dynamics of general relativity,

R. L. Arnowitt, S. Deser, and C. W. Misner, “The Dynamics of general relativity,”Gen. Rel. Grav.40 (2008) 1997–2027, arXiv:gr-qc/0405109

2008 arXiv
[279]

J. D. Jackson,Classical Electrodynamics. Wiley, 1998

1998
[280]

D. J. Griffiths,Introduction to Electrodynamics. Cambridge University Press, 4 ed., 2017

2017
[281]

Gravitational Waves in Full, Non-Linear General Relativity,

F. D’Ambrosio, S. D. B. Fell, L. Heisenberg, D. Maibach, S. Zentarra, and J. Zosso, “Gravitational Waves in Full, Non-Linear General Relativity,” arXiv:2201.11634 [gr-qc]

arXiv
[282]

Perturbations of spacetimes in general relativity,

J. M. Stewart and M. Walker, “Perturbations of spacetimes in general relativity,”Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A341 (1974) 49–74

1974
[283]

Theory of cosmological perturbations. Part 1. Classical perturbations. Part 2. Quantum theory of perturbations. Part 3. Extensions,

V. F. Mukhanov, H. A. Feldman, and R. H. Brandenberger, “Theory of cosmological perturbations. Part 1. Classical perturbations. Part 2. Quantum theory of perturbations. Part 3. Extensions,”Phys. Rept.215 (1992) 203–333

1992
[284]

Method of the Self-Consistent Field in General Relativity and its Application to the Gravitational Geon,

D. R. Brill and J. B. Hartle, “Method of the Self-Consistent Field in General Relativity and its Application to the Gravitational Geon,”Phys. Rev.135 (1964) B271–B278

1964
[285]

Space-time averages of classical physical fields,

R. Zalaletdinov, “Space-time averages of classical physical fields,” arXiv:gr-qc/0411004

arXiv
[286]

Effective Gravitational Wave Stress-energy Tensor in Alternative Theories of Gravity,

L. C. Stein and N. Yunes, “Effective Gravitational Wave Stress-energy Tensor in Alternative Theories of Gravity,”Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 064038, arXiv:1012.3144 [gr-qc]

2011 arXiv
[287]

Gauge Invariant Cosmological Perturbations,

J. M. Bardeen, “Gauge Invariant Cosmological Perturbations,”Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 1882–1905

1980
[288]

Cosmological Perturbations from a Group Theoretical Point of View,

I. Szapudi and V. G. Czinner, “Cosmological Perturbations from a Group Theoretical Point of View,”Class. Quant. Grav.29 (2012) 015007, arXiv:1111.7027 [gr-qc]

2012 arXiv
[289]

Investigations in relativistic cosmology,

E. M. Lifshitz and I. M. Khalatnikov, “Investigations in relativistic cosmology,”Adv. Phys.12 (1963) 185–249. 461

1963
[290]

Theory of cosmological perturbations in an anisotropic universe,

T. S. Pereira, C. Pitrou, and J.-P. Uzan, “Theory of cosmological perturbations in an anisotropic universe,”JCAP 09 (2007) 006, arXiv:0707.0736 [astro-ph]

2007 arXiv
[291]

Physical response of light-time gravitational wave detectors,

M. J. Koop and L. S. Finn, “Physical response of light-time gravitational wave detectors,”Phys. Rev. D90 (Sep, 2014) 062002

2014
[292]

Phenomenological Lagrangians,

S. Weinberg, “Phenomenological Lagrangians,”Physica A96 no. 1-2, (1979) 327–340

1979
[293]

Chiral Perturbation Theory to One Loop,

J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, “Chiral Perturbation Theory to One Loop,” Annals Phys.158 (1984) 142

1984
[294]

Chiral Perturbation Theory: Expansions in the Mass of the Strange Quark,

J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, “Chiral Perturbation Theory: Expansions in the Mass of the Strange Quark,”Nucl. Phys. B250 (1985) 465–516

1985
[295]

Effective Lagrangian approach to precision measurements: The Anomalous magnetic moment of the muon,

C. Arzt, M. B. Einhorn, and J. Wudka, “Effective Lagrangian approach to precision measurements: The Anomalous magnetic moment of the muon,” Phys. Rev. D49 (1994) 1370–1377, arXiv:hep-ph/9304206

1994 arXiv
[296]

Uses and abuses of effective Lagrangians,

C. P. Burgess and D. London, “Uses and abuses of effective Lagrangians,” Phys. Rev. D48 (1993) 4337–4351, arXiv:hep-ph/9203216

1993 arXiv
[297]

Effective field theory and the Fermi surface,

J. Polchinski, “Effective field theory and the Fermi surface,” inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute (TASI 92): From Black Holes and Strings to Particles, pp. 0235–276. 6, 1992.arXiv:hep-th/9210046

1992 arXiv
[298]

T. Y. Cao,New Philosophy of Renormalization: From the Renormalization Group Equations to Effective Field Theories, pp. 87–133. Springer New York, New York, NY, 1993

1993
[299]

Effective Field Theory for Inflation,

S. Weinberg, “Effective Field Theory for Inflation,”Phys. Rev. D77 (2008) 123541, arXiv:0804.4291 [hep-th]

2008 arXiv
[300]

Quantum gravity and precision tests,

C. P. Burgess, “Quantum gravity and precision tests,” arXiv:gr-qc/0606108 [gr-qc]

arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Die Feldgleichungen der Gravitation,

A. Einstein, “Die Feldgleichungen der Gravitation,”Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin(1915) 844–847

1915

[2] [2]

Die Grundlagen der Physik. (Erste Mitteilung.),

D. Hilbert, “Die Grundlagen der Physik. (Erste Mitteilung.),”Nachrichten von der Koeniglichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Goettingen, Math-physik. Klasse(1915) 395–407

1915

[3] [3]

Die Grundlage der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie,

A. Einstein, “Die Grundlage der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie,”Annalen der Physik354 no. 7, (1916) 769–822

1916

[4] [4]

Weinberg,Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity

S. Weinberg,Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity. Wiley, 1972

1972

[5] [5]

C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler,Gravitation. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1973

1973

[6] [6]

R. M. Wald,General Relativity. Chicago Univ. Pr., Chicago, USA, 1984

1984

[7] [7]

Landau and E

L. Landau and E. Lifshitz,The Classical Theory of Fields (Fourth Edition). Pergamon, 1975

1975

[8] [8]

The Basics of gravitational wave theory,

E. E. Flanagan and S. A. Hughes, “The Basics of gravitational wave theory,” New J. Phys.7 (2005) 204, arXiv:gr-qc/0501041

arXiv 2005