Order-disorder phase transition of cell membrane induced by THz irradiation studied via fluorescence recovery after photobleaching

Hiromichi Hoshina

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 28 references

Order-disorder phase transition of cell membrane induced by THz irradiation studied via fluorescence recovery after photobleaching

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read THz irradiation increases cell-membrane diffusion without heating

desk verdict New THz-FRAP combination with a plausible but not yet proven non-thermal membrane effect; the temperature calibration is the load-bearing uncertainty. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.06364 v1 pith:TTNM6XGM submitted 2024-12-09 physics.bio-ph physics.app-phphysics.opticsq-bio.QM

Hiromichi Hoshina This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.bio-phphysics.app-phphysics.opticsq-bio.QM

keywords THzirradiationnon-thermaleffectscellmembraneorder-disorderphasetransitionfluorescencerecoveryafterphotobleachinglateraldiffusionboundwaterHeLacells

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether terahertz radiation can change living cell membranes through a non-thermal mechanism. Using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) under continuous THz irradiation, the authors measured lipid lateral diffusion in HeLa cell membranes at 0.10, 0.29, and 0.48 THz. After correcting for THz-induced warming with an ultrathin thermocouple, they report that 0.10 and 0.29 THz irradiation increases the diffusion constant at sample temperatures below the cell growth temperature, while 0.48 THz shows no significant effect. They interpret this as THz-driven excitation of bound water molecules that destabilizes the ordered lipid phase, effectively melting part of the membrane. If correct, this would mean safety standards for THz exposure and future cell-manipulation tools must account for non-thermal membrane effects.

What carries the argument

The central tool is THz-FRAP: fluorescence recovery after photobleaching performed while the sample is irradiated from below with a focused THz beam. A small spot of membrane fluorophores is bleached with a laser, and the recovery rate $\tau$ of fluorescence yields the lateral diffusion constant $D = \omega^2/(4\tau)$, where $\omega$ is the bleached-spot radius. The load-bearing companion is a temperature calibration in which an ultrathin (13 µm) thermocouple at the dish bottom measures the sample temperature during THz irradiation, letting the authors subtract thermal effects and attribute residual diffusion changes to non-thermal THz action. Mechanistically, the paper leans on the idea that sub-THz radiation excites the relaxation dynamics of hydration water around the lipid headgroups, mirroring earlier observations on protein hydration water.

What would settle it

Measure the cell-membrane temperature directly with a ratiometric fluorescent temperature probe during 0.10 THz irradiation: if the directly measured membrane temperature rise, combined with the control diffusion-versus-temperature curve, fully explains the diffusion increase, the non-thermal phase-transition claim is falsified. Conversely, if a direct lipid-order probe such as Laurdan generalized polarization drops under THz at constant measured temperature, the claim is supported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that irradiating HeLa cells with continuous-wave THz light at 0.10 and 0.29 THz raises the lateral diffusion constant of membrane lipids when the sample temperature is below about 37 °C, even after the temperature increase caused by THz absorption is subtracted using a calibrated thermocouple. The effect is frequency-dependent: no significant diffusion increase is observed at 0.48 THz at the tested power density. The authors propose that sub-THz photons excite the dynamics of water molecules bound to the lipid bilayer, allowing water to penetrate hydrophilic regions and drive the membrane from an ordered (gel-like) state toward a disordered (fluid) state. This is presented as direct evidence for a non-thermal, water-mediated order-disorder phase transition in a living cell membrane.

Load-bearing premise

The thin thermocouple at the bottom of the dish is assumed to measure the true temperature of the cell membrane during THz exposure; if it under-reads the membrane temperature, the observed diffusion increase could be ordinary heating.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

THz exposure at 0.10 and 0.29 THz increases lipid lateral diffusion in HeLa membranes below the growth temperature, even after correcting for sample heating.
The absence of an effect at 0.48 THz indicates a frequency-dependent non-thermal response rather than a simple heating artifact.
Membrane properties that depend on lipid order, such as permeability, protein mobility, adhesion, and signaling, could be altered by sub-THz irradiation without a measurable bulk temperature rise.
Safety standards for THz radiation may need to include non-thermal membrane effects, not just tissue heating.
The same mechanism could become a contactless way to manipulate membrane fluidity in cultured cells or artificial lipid systems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A direct test the paper leaves implicit: the same 0.1–0.3 THz window should lower Laurdan generalized polarization in HeLa membranes at fixed temperature, because the proposed mechanism is a decrease in lipid order.
If bound-water relaxation drives the effect, it should be hydration-dependent; dehydrating the membrane surface should suppress the diffusion increase, while excess hydration should enhance it.
An independent optical measurement of membrane temperature during irradiation, for example with a ratiometric fluorescent probe, would settle whether the thermocouple calibration fully accounts for local warming.
The frequency window around 0.1–0.3 THz may correspond to a specific relaxation mode of membrane-bound water; if so, the effect should scale with absorbed power in that mode rather than with total power density.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The genuinely new thing here is the THz-FRAP combination: living HeLa cells exposed to cw THz at three frequencies, with FRAP readout of lateral diffusion. That is a reasonable way to ask whether sub-THz photons affect membranes beyond heating. The alternating ON/OFF design and multiple samples are decent, and the frequency-dependent pattern (0.10 and 0.29 THz show an effect, 0.48 THz does not) is interesting if it holds.

The big problem is the temperature calibration. The 13-µm thermocouple sits at the bottom of the dish, while the cells adhere to the upper side of the 0.15-mm film. The THz beam is absorbed mainly by cells and water, and the film is in the thermal path. If the thermocouple reads cooler than the membrane, the correction undercorrects and the non-thermal claim evaporates. Table 1 makes this concrete: 0.48 THz at 20 mW/cm² gives ΔTs ≈ 2.4–2.8 °C, nearly the same as 0.10 THz at 89 mW/cm² (2.5–3.0 °C), even though the absorbed power at 0.48 THz should be roughly half. That inconsistency suggests the sensor is not faithfully reporting membrane temperature. Since the whole conclusion rests on that correction, this is load-bearing, not a footnote.

Second, the 0.48 THz null is not clean: it is also the lowest power (20 mW/cm² vs 89 and 65). So the frequency dependence could just be power dependence. The authors acknowledge this, but it still weakens the claim.

Third, the manuscript uses mm everywhere it should use µm (ROI diameter ~6 mm, mode field diameter 4.6 mm, cell thickness 10–30 mm, D in mm²/s). That is obviously a units typo, but it makes the paper look careless and needs fixing.

The phase-transition title is stronger than the data. Diffusion constants going up at low temperature is consistent with increased fluidity, but calling it an order–disorder phase transition requires direct membrane-order evidence (e.g., Laurdan or 2H NMR). The bound-water mechanism is speculative, though Sugiyama et al. gives it plausibility.

Who is this for? People working on THz bioeffects, membrane biophysics, and safety standards. They will find the method section useful and the question worth pursuing. It deserves a serious referee, but the referee should demand either a power-matched frequency comparison or an independent membrane-temperature measurement (e.g., a temperature-sensitive fluorophore) before the non-thermal claim is accepted. My recommendation: send it to peer review with the expectation of major revision. The core experimental idea is sound, the execution is mostly reasonable, but the central claim needs stronger calibration evidence.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports THz-FRAP measurements of lateral diffusion coefficients D of HeLa cell membranes under continuous-wave irradiation at 0.10, 0.29, and 0.48 THz, with power densities from 20 to 89 mW/cm2. After correcting the incubator temperature using a thermocouple-based calibration of the THz-induced temperature rise, the authors find that 0.10 and 0.29 THz irradiation increases D at sample temperatures below about 37 °C compared with no-THz controls, while 0.48 THz does not. They interpret this as a non-thermal, THz-induced order-disorder phase transition of membrane lipids mediated by hydration-water dynamics. The central claim is that the diffusion increase is genuinely non-thermal once the heating contribution is subtracted.

Significance. The paper presents a directly measured membrane-dynamics observable under controlled THz exposure and reports a clear, visually apparent difference in diffusion between 0.10/0.29 THz and control conditions. If the non-thermal interpretation survives scrutiny, the result is significant for THz bioeffect safety standards and for proposed THz-based cell manipulation. The study is not circular: the FRAP recovery time constant is measured from the data, and no equation is constructed to force the reported conclusion. The main significance therefore rests on the reliability of the temperature correction and on the statistical treatment of the repeated FRAP measurements.

major comments (3)

[Methods, 'Calibration of cell temperature'; Table 1] The non-thermal interpretation rests entirely on the calibrated sample temperature Ts. The 13-µm thermocouple is placed at the bottom of the dish, while the THz beam is absorbed mainly by the cell layer on the upper side of the 0.15-mm film; the thermal resistance of the film means the sensor can read lower than the actual membrane temperature. If ΔTs is underestimated, the THz data are compared at too-low Ts values, and a purely thermal elevation of D would appear as a non-thermal effect. Table 1 reinforces this concern: 0.48 THz at 20 mW/cm2 with α ≈ 75 cm⁻¹ is reported to give ΔTs = 2.4–2.8 °C, essentially the same as 0.10 THz at 89 mW/cm2 with α ≈ 37 cm⁻¹ (ΔTs = 2.5–3.0 °C), although a simple absorbed-power estimate gives roughly half the temperature rise for 0.48 THz. This inconsistency suggests that the calibration does not faithfully report membrane temperature. I request an independent membrane-temperature measurement (for example, a temperature-sensitive fluorescent dye or a thermocouple at the upper film surface) or a quantitative thermal model, and a discussion of how the reported ΔTs values are consistent with the stated power densities and absorption coefficients.
[Methods, 'FRAP measurement'; Fig. 3] The statistical significance of the central comparison is not established as reported. The Methods state that approximately 20 points were measured without THz and 20 with THz on each sample, alternating ON/OFF, with more than four samples per condition. If all individual FRAP measurements are pooled as independent observations for the t-test in Fig. 3, the analysis suffers from pseudoreplication, making the p-values anti-conservative. The paper should report the number of cells or independent samples per condition, average the repeated measurements by sample before hypothesis testing, or use a mixed-effects model that accounts for repeated measures.
[Discussion; Fig. 4] The title and abstract state that THz irradiation induces an order-disorder phase transition of the membrane lipids, but the measured observable is only the lateral diffusion coefficient. An increase in D at temperatures below the growth temperature is consistent with an order-disorder transition, but it is also consistent with other mechanisms such as altered hydration, changed cytoskeletal coupling, or membrane remodeling. No direct order parameter (for example, Laurdan generalized polarization, 2H NMR order parameter, or calorimetry) is measured under THz irradiation. I recommend either softening the phase-transition conclusion or adding a direct order-parameter measurement; as written, the interpretive step from increased D to 'order-disorder phase transition' is an unsupported assumption.

minor comments (4)

[Throughout the manuscript] Lengths that should be micrometers are written as millimeters: the ROI diameter is approximately 6 mm, the mode-field diameter is 4.6 mm, the cell thickness is 10–30 mm, the image scale is 0.075 mm/pixel, the THz penetration depths are 117/73/58 mm, and D is reported in mm2/s. These values are physically implausible as printed, and they affect the numerical value of the central observable D through the formula D = ω2/4τ. Please correct all units to µm and report D in µm2/s.
[Methods, 'FRAP measurement'] The text says the fluorescence intensity was 'fitted to an exponential decay function, and the decay rate τ was calculated,' but FRAP recovery is an increase in fluorescence, not a decay. Please clarify the fitted recovery model (for example, F(t) = A(1 − exp(−t/τ)) with a mobile fraction) so that the relationship between the fitted time constant and the reported D is unambiguous.
[Fig. 1 and Fig. 5] The figures would benefit from explicit scale bars with correct units and from axis labels with units on the intensity-recovery plot; the current captions leave the reader to infer the length and time scales from the text.
[Table 1] The reported ΔTs ranges (for example, 2.5–3.0 °C) have no associated uncertainty, number of replicate measurements, or description of how the range was estimated; adding these details would help the reader assess the calibration's reliability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the diffusion constants are measured observables, and the non-thermal claim rests on an independent temperature calibration, not on a fitted parameter or self-citation.

full rationale

This paper is an experimental study, not a derivation. The lateral diffusion constant D is obtained from the measured FRAP recovery time τ via D = ω²/4τ, where τ is fitted to the fluorescence recovery curve. That fit is a standard data-reduction step; τ is a measured observable, not a parameter introduced to force the conclusion. The central claim—that D increases under 0.10 and 0.29 THz irradiation after correcting for THz heating—is not equivalent by construction to any input: the result could have been null (as it was for 0.48 THz), and the comparison is made against control measurements at similar calibrated temperatures. The temperature calibration uses an independent thermocouple measurement; even if the calibration is imperfect or the Table 1 ΔTs values are physically hard to justify, that is a correctness/thermal-validity concern, not a circularity. The paper cites prior work (e.g., Sugiyama et al. on sub-THz hydration dynamics, Leung et al. on lipid order and water) only as external analogy and support, not as a load-bearing self-citation chain; the author does not cite his own prior work to establish the result. No equation in the paper reduces to a fitted value, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors, and no known result is merely renamed. The honest finding is therefore no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on five unproven assumptions: a simplified FRAP diffusion model, the validity of the thermocouple temperature readout, the water-like absorbance of cells, the interpretation of diffusion changes as a phase transition, and a bound-water mechanism that is not directly tested. One free parameter (the calibration curve) is not fully reported. No new entities are proposed.

free parameters (1)

Temperature calibration curve Ts vs T1 during THz irradiation = not reported (only ΔTs ranges)
Used to plot diffusion coefficients against sample temperature Ts and to claim the effect is non-thermal. Without the actual calibration curve the correction cannot be reproduced or audited.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The FRAP recovery time constant τ from an exponential fit relates to the lateral diffusion constant by D = ω²/(4τ).
Invoked in Methods to compute D. Standard FRAP models use half-time for a disk, not necessarily an exponential time constant, so this is an unvalidated modeling assumption.
domain assumption The thermocouple placed at the bottom of the dish measures the true temperature of the cell membrane during THz irradiation.
Load-bearing for the non-thermal claim. No validation that the thermocouple sees the same temperature as the cells.
domain assumption The HeLa cell absorbance in the THz region is similar to that of liquid water.
Used to calculate penetration depth. Cited to Shiraga 2018, but cells are not pure water.
ad hoc to paper An increase in lateral diffusion at temperatures below the growth temperature indicates an order-disorder phase transition of the membrane lipids.
The paper does not measure membrane order directly; it infers the phase transition from diffusion changes, supported only by analogy with prior DSC and Laurdan studies.
ad hoc to paper The diffusion increase is caused by THz excitation of bound water relaxation modes.
Proposed mechanism to explain why 0.10/0.29 THz work and 0.48 THz does not. It is not tested in this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Order-disorder phase transition of cell membrane induced by THz irradiation studied via fluorescence recovery after photobleaching." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TTNM6XGM

@misc{pith2026241206364,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Order-disorder phase transition of cell membrane induced by THz irradiation studied via fluorescence recovery after photobleaching},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TTNM6XGM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.06364}
}

read the original abstract

To elucidate the mechanism by which THz radiation non-thermally affects living organisms, the lateral diffusion constants of lipid molecules in the cell membranes of HeLa cells were measured using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching under THz wave irradiation (THz-FRAP) at frequencies of 0.10, 0.29, and 0.48 THz, with power densities ranging from 20 to 89 mW/cm2. The potential heating effects of the THz irradiation were eliminated through temperature calibration using an ultrathin thermocouple, allowing for the investigation of the non-thermal effects of THz radiation. Irradiation at 0.10 and 0.29 THz induced an increase in diffusion constants at temperatures lower than the cell growth temperature. This suggests that THz irradiation induces the order-disorder phase transition of the cell membrane lipids by affecting the dynamics of bound water molecules. Our findings have important implications for the establishment of safety standards for THz radiation and for the potential development of new methods for cell manipulation using THz irradiation in the future

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

28 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages

[1]

& Kuwata -Gonokami, M

Peiponen, K.-E., Zeitler, A. & Kuwata -Gonokami, M. Terahertz Spectroscopy and Imaging. Vol. 171 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, Heidelberg, 2013)

work page 2013
[2]

Markelz, A. G. & Mittleman, D. M. Perspective on terahertz applications in bioscience and biotechnology. ACS Photonics 9, 1117–1126 (2022)

2022
[3]

Mourad, A., Yang, R., Lehne, P. H. & De La Oliva, A. A baseline roadmap for advanced wireless research beyond 5G. Electron. Switz. 9, 1–14 (2020)

work page 2020
[4]

& Zorzi, M

Giordani, M., Polese, M., Mezzavilla, M., Rangan, S. & Zorzi, M. Toward 6G networks: Use cases and technologies. IEEE Commun. Mag. 58, 55–61 (2020)

work page 2020
[5]

Lien, J. et al. Soli: Ubiquitous gesture sensing with millimeter wave radar. ACM Trans. Graph. 35, 1–19 (2016)

work page 2016
[6]

Health Phys

Guidelines for limiting exposure to electromagnetic fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz). Health Phys. 118, 483–524 (2020)

work page 2020
[7]

5G wireless communication and health effects—A pragmatic review based on available studies regarding 6 to 100 GHz

Simkó & Mattsson. 5G wireless communication and health effects—A pragmatic review based on available studies regarding 6 to 100 GHz. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 16, 3406 (2019)

work page 2019
[8]

Cherkasova, O. P. et al. Effects of terahertz radiation on living cells: A review. Opt. Spectrosc. 128, 855–866 (2020)

work page 2020

Show all 28 references

[9]

Cherkasova, O. P. et al. Cellular effects of terahertz waves. J. Biomed. Opt. 26, (2021)

2021
[10]

Yamazaki, S. et al. Actin polymerization is activated by terahertz irradiation. Sci. Rep. 8, 9990 (2018)

2018
[11]

Yamazaki, S. et al. THz irradiation inhibits cell division by affecting actin dynamics. PLoS ONE 16, e0248381 (2021)

2021
[12]

Lawler, N. B. et al. Millimeter waves alter DNA secondary structures and modulate the transcriptome in human fibroblasts. Biomed. Opt. Express 13, 3131 (2022)

2022
[13]

Franchini, V . et al. Study of the effects of 0.15 terahertz radiation on genome integrity of adult fibroblasts. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 00, 1–12 (2018)

2018
[14]

S., Ratushnyak, A

Olshevskaya, J. S., Ratushnyak, A. S., Petrov, A. K., Kozlov, A. S. & Zapara, T. A. Effect of terahertz electromagnetic waves on neurons systems. In 2008 IEEE Region 8 International Conference on Computational Technologies in Electrical and Electronics Engineering 210– 211 (IE...

2008
[15]

Pikov, V ., Arakaki, X., Harrington, M., Fraser, S. E. & Siegel, P. H. Modulation of neuronal activity and plasma membrane properties with low -power millimeter waves in organotypic cortical slices. J. Neural Eng. 7, 045003 (2010)

2010
[16]

Lei, M. et al. Membrane-mediated modulation of mitochondrial physiology by terahertz waves. Biomed. Opt. Express 15, 4065 (2024)

2024
[17]

Nibali, V . C. & Havenith, M. New insights into the role of water in biological function: Studying solvated biomolecules using terahertz absorption spectroscopy in conjunction with molecular dynamics simulations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 12800–12807 (2014)

2014
[18]

& Havenith, M

Born, B. & Havenith, M. Terahertz dance of proteins and sugars with water. J. Infrared Millim. Terahertz Waves 30, 1245–1254 (2009)

2009
[19]

& Tominaga, K

Yamamoto, N., Ohta, K., Tamura, A. & Tominaga, K. Broadband dielectric spectroscopy on lysozyme in the sub -gigahertz to terahertz frequency regions: Effects of hydration and thermal excitation. J. Phys. Chem. B 120, 4743–4755 (2016)

2016
[20]

Sugiyama, J. et al. Nonthermal acceleration of protein hydration by sub -terahertz irradiation. Nat. Commun. 14, 2825 (2023)

2023
[21]

Cai, N. et al. Recent advances in fluorescence recovery after photobleaching for decoupling transport and kinetics of biomacromolecules in cellular physiol ogy. Polymers 14, 1913 (2022)

2022
[22]

Thermal Biophysics of Membranes

Heimburg, T. Thermal Biophysics of Membranes . (Wiley -VCH Verlag, Weinheim, 2007)

2007
[23]

Phase transitions in biological membranes

Heimburg, T. Phase transitions in biological membranes. In Thermodynamics and Biophysics of Biomedical Nanosystems (eds. Demetzos, C. & Pippa, N.) 39 –61 (Springer Singapore, Singapore, 2019). doi:10.1007/978-981-13-0989-2_3

2019 doi
[24]

& Westerhausen, C

Färber, N. & Westerhausen, C. Broad lipid phase transitions in mammalian cell membranes measured by Laurdan fluorescence spectroscopy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA - Biomembr. 1864, 183794 (2022)

2022
[25]

& Westerhausen, C

Färber, N., Reitler, J., Schäfer, J. & Westerhausen, C. Transport across cell membranes is modulated by lipid order. Adv. Biol. 7, 2200282 (2023)

2023
[26]

Leung, S. S. W., Brewer, J., Bagatolli, L. A. & Thewalt, J. L. Measuring molecular order for lipid membrane phase studies: Linear relationship between Laurdan generalized polarization and deuterium NMR order parameter. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA - Biomembr. 1861, 183053 (2019)

2019
[27]

Yamamoto, N. et al. Effect of temperature and hydration level on purple membrane dynamics studied using broadband dielectric spectroscopy from sub-GHz to THz regions. J. Phys. Chem. B 122, 1367–1377 (2018)

2018
[28]

& Ogawa, Y

Shiraga, K., Tanaka, K., Arikawa, T., Saito, S. & Ogawa, Y . Reconsideration of the relaxational and vibrational line shapes of liquid water based on ultrabroadband dielectric spectroscopy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 26200–26209 (2018)

2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

& Kuwata -Gonokami, M

Peiponen, K.-E., Zeitler, A. & Kuwata -Gonokami, M. Terahertz Spectroscopy and Imaging. Vol. 171 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, Heidelberg, 2013)

work page 2013

[2] [2]

Markelz, A. G. & Mittleman, D. M. Perspective on terahertz applications in bioscience and biotechnology. ACS Photonics 9, 1117–1126 (2022)

2022

[3] [3]

Mourad, A., Yang, R., Lehne, P. H. & De La Oliva, A. A baseline roadmap for advanced wireless research beyond 5G. Electron. Switz. 9, 1–14 (2020)

work page 2020

[4] [4]

& Zorzi, M

Giordani, M., Polese, M., Mezzavilla, M., Rangan, S. & Zorzi, M. Toward 6G networks: Use cases and technologies. IEEE Commun. Mag. 58, 55–61 (2020)

work page 2020

[5] [5]

Lien, J. et al. Soli: Ubiquitous gesture sensing with millimeter wave radar. ACM Trans. Graph. 35, 1–19 (2016)

work page 2016

[6] [6]

Health Phys

Guidelines for limiting exposure to electromagnetic fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz). Health Phys. 118, 483–524 (2020)

work page 2020

[7] [7]

5G wireless communication and health effects—A pragmatic review based on available studies regarding 6 to 100 GHz

Simkó & Mattsson. 5G wireless communication and health effects—A pragmatic review based on available studies regarding 6 to 100 GHz. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 16, 3406 (2019)

work page 2019

[8] [8]

Cherkasova, O. P. et al. Effects of terahertz radiation on living cells: A review. Opt. Spectrosc. 128, 855–866 (2020)

work page 2020