Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 92 references

Polaronic dressing of bound states

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that dressing two impurities in a Bose-Einstein condensate as polarons can destroy or preserve their direct dimer bound state according to the ratio of the bare binding energy to the polaron energy.

desk verdict A well-posed BSE study of polaron-dressed dimers with an interesting central claim, but the well- to ill-defined crossover rests on an unvaried artificial broadening; deserves review with a gamma-dependence check. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.06520 v3 pith:DNFROLA2 submitted 2024-12-09 cond-mat.quant-gas cond-mat.mes-hall

Luis A. Peña Ardila , Arturo Camacho-Guardian This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.mes-hall
keywords BosepolarondimerboundstateBethe-Salpeterequationimpurity-impurityscatteringBose-Einsteincondensatespectralfunctiondressing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks what happens to a true two-body bound state, the simplest composite impurity, when each constituent atom is dressed by the excitations of a Bose-Einstein condensate. Its central claim is that polaron dressing can drive a dimer from a well-defined bound state to an ill-defined one, with the crossover controlled by comparing the bare dimer binding energy $\epsilon_I^{(0)}$ with the polaron energy $\omega_P^0$. Weakly bound dimers, with $|\epsilon_I^{(0)}| \ll \omega_P^0$, are fragile and dissolve into a broad scattering continuum as impurity-boson coupling grows, while tightly bound dimers, with $|\epsilon_I^{(0)}| \gg \omega_P^0$, remain robust. The result matters because it shows that internal structure changes how quasiparticle dressing acts, and it gives a concrete ratio criterion for when a molecular bound state survives inside a quantum bath.

What carries the argument

The workhorse is the Bethe-Salpeter equation for the impurity-impurity vertex, $\Gamma^{-1}(Q,\omega) = m_c/(4\pi a_{II}) - \int d^3q/(2\pi)^3\, \Pi_q(Q,\omega)$, whose poles locate two-body bound states. The new element is that the impurity Green's function entering the pair propagator is dressed by the non-self-consistent T-matrix polaron self-energy, so the full spectral function, not just the quasiparticle pole, feeds the two-body problem. The diagnostic is the spectral function of the scattering matrix, whose peak position gives the dressed dimer energy and whose full width at half maximum gives the criterion for calling a bound state well-defined or ill-defined. The argument also uses a small imaginary broadening added numerically to the impurity Green's function when computing spectral functions.

What would settle it

Measure the impurity-impurity spectral function via radio-frequency association spectroscopy of Feshbach molecules immersed in a BEC; if a sharp dimer peak remains when $|\epsilon_I^{(0)}| \ll \omega_P^0$ at the impurity-boson resonance, the proposed breakdown does not occur. Numerically, repeat the Bethe-Salpeter calculation with $\gamma_X/E_n$ varied from 0.1 down to 0.01; if the FWHM of the bound-state peak shrinks proportionally to $\gamma$ and the crossover boundary shifts, the ill-defined regime is an artifact of the chosen width.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper demonstrates, within a Green's-function treatment, that the spectral function of the impurity-impurity scattering matrix, $A(0,\omega) = -2\,\mathrm{Im}\,\Gamma(0,\omega)$, evolves from a sharp pole to a broad feature as the impurity-boson scattering length is varied. At fixed impurity-impurity attraction, increasing polaron dressing broadens and shifts the dimer pole; in the strongly interacting impurity-boson regime, no sharp peak remains for a weakly bound dimer, whereas a tightly bound dimer keeps a recognizable pole even at the resonant point where the impurity-boson scattering length diverges. The boundary between the dimer regime and the polaron-dominated regime is a smooth crossover located near $|\epsilon_I^{(0)}| = \omega_P^0$, with no sharp transition. The authors present this as a new regime diagram for dressed dimers in a BEC, and note that repulsive impurity-boson interactions produce the most dramatic breakdown because of the repulsive polaron branch and the appearance of incoherent excitations.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion that a dimer becomes ill-defined relies on comparing peak widths computed with an artificial imaginary broadening $\gamma_X/E_n = 0.1$ added to the impurity Green's function, and no convergence check in $\gamma$ is reported, so if this broadening is a numerical artifact rather than a physical effect, the breakdown boundary would not be a real property of the system.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Weakly bound dimers in a BEC should be difficult or impossible to observe as sharp molecular states near an impurity-boson resonance, because polaron dressing broadens their spectral line beyond the binding energy.
  • Tightly bound dimers should remain identifiable even at impurity-boson resonance, with only a reduced spectral amplitude and a shifted binding energy.
  • The crossover between the dimer regime and the polaron-dominated regime occurs smoothly near $|\epsilon_I^{(0)}| = \omega_P^0$, so no critical point or phase transition is expected.
  • Repulsive impurity-boson interactions are predicted to destroy the dimer more abruptly than attractive ones, because of the repulsive polaron branch and incoherent excitations.
  • Current experiments that probe Feshbach molecules should be able to test the predicted disappearance of the molecular signal by tuning the impurity-impurity scattering length at fixed impurity-boson coupling.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension not computed in the paper is that the FWHM-to-binding-energy ratio of the dressed dimer should be a universal function of $|\epsilon_I^{(0)}|/\omega_P^0$ across different mass ratios and bath densities.
  • If the ratio criterion is general, it should also apply to other direct bound states immersed in quantum baths, such as excitons coupled to phonons, wherever the polaron picture holds.
  • An experimental extension would sweep $a_{II}$ through a Feshbach resonance at fixed $a_{IB}$ and look for a sudden loss of molecular association signal when $|\epsilon_I^{(0)}|$ drops below $\omega_P^0$.
  • Because the calculation adds a finite imaginary width $\gamma_X/E_n = 0.1$, repeating the Bethe-Salpeter solution with smaller $\gamma$ would show whether the crossover boundary is intrinsic or partly seeded by the numerical broadening.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates how polaron dressing modifies a direct two-impurity bound state in a Bose-Einstein condensate. The authors solve the Bethe-Salpeter equation (Eq. (2)) for impurity-impurity scattering using the full impurity Green's function, with the impurity self-energy computed in the non-self-consistent T-matrix approximation (Eq. (5)). They compute the spectral function A(Q,ω) of the scattering matrix for a weakly bound dimer (1/k_n a_II = 0.5) and a more tightly bound dimer (1/k_n a_II = 1), scanning the impurity-boson coupling strength. They find that a sharp bound-state peak broadens and apparently disappears for the weakly bound dimer at strong impurity-boson coupling, while the tightly bound dimer remains well-defined. The results are organized in a phase diagram in which the crossover between a dimer phase and a polaron-dominated phase is set by |ε_I^(0)| ≈ ω_P^0.

Significance. Understanding whether an existing bound state survives strong dressing by a quantum bath is a timely and relevant problem, and solving the BSE with the full impurity Green's function goes beyond earlier quasiparticle-only treatments of bipolarons. If the claimed destruction of the dimer is robust, the paper would provide a clear qualitative criterion—bare dimer binding energy versus polaron energy—for the stability of molecular states in Bose gases, with direct experimental relevance to Feshbach-molecule probes. The numerical setup is transparent and the dataset is made openly available. The main reservation is that the central 'well-defined to ill-defined' distinction is currently calibrated by an artificial width γ_X/E_n = 0.1 with no convergence test, so the physical content of the crossover is not yet fully established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Numerical paragraph after Eq. (5); Figs. 2–5] The conclusion that a dressed dimer becomes ill-defined rests on the artificial broadening i γ_X/E_n = 0.1 added to the impurity Green's function rather than on a physical decay mechanism. This width enters every impurity propagator in the BSE and therefore contributes directly to the FWHM of A(0,ω) used in Fig. 5, at a scale (of order 2γ_X from the two impurity lines) that is not negligible compared to the weakly bound dimer energy |ε_I^(0)|/E_n = 0.5. No γ_X-dependence, γ_X → 0 extrapolation, or alternative regulator is reported. Please show that the broadening of the bound-state feature and the apparent disappearance of the pole survive as γ_X → 0, or otherwise separate the numerical regularization from the physical polaron-induced damping.
  2. [Fig. 5 and the text below it; Fig. 1] The criterion for 'breakdown of the dressed dimer' is qualitative: the text states that the width becomes 'much larger' than the dimer energy, but no quantitative threshold is defined, and the phase boundary |ε_I^(0)| = ω_P^0 in Fig. 1 is asserted as an energy comparison rather than extracted from a pole or FWHM condition. To make the central claim load-bearing, specify how the peak position and FWHM are extracted from A(0,ω), define the breakdown threshold, and verify that the crossover curve follows from that operational definition over the parameter range shown.
  3. [Eq. (5); Conclusions] The regime in which the dimer is claimed to break down is the strongly interacting impurity-boson regime (1/k_n a_IB near and above zero), which is precisely the regime where the NSCT self-energy is an uncontrolled approximation; the authors themselves note that the strongly interacting Bose polaron remains an open question. Because the central result is obtained inside this regime, the robustness of the conclusion under improved self-energies (for example, a comparison with Quantum Monte Carlo or variational polaron results at the two-body level) should be assessed, or the claims should be correspondingly qualified.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 5 caption] The caption repeats 'k naII' for both the horizontal axis and the impurity-boson scattering length; the latter should presumably read 'k naIB'.
  2. [Fig. 6 caption and text below Eq. (8)] The sentence 'The self-energy is calculated following the NSCT approximation as in (b)' appears to refer to panel (c) of Fig. 6; please correct the panel reference.
  3. [Conclusions] The phrase 'more robust towards polaron' should read 'more robust against polaron dressing' for clarity.
  4. [Fig. 4(b) discussion] The phrase 'insights of a bound state' should be 'signatures of a bound state'.
  5. [Eq. (5)] The denominator in Eq. (5) would be clearer if parentheses were added around the square-root factor following the factor (m_r^{3/2}/m_r).

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Phase boundary is defined by the same |ε_I^0| vs ω_P^0 ratio used to explain the crossover, and the FWHM-based 'ill-defined' criterion is inflated by an unvaried artificial γ=0.1; the BSE spectral computations themselves are independent.

  1. self definitional [Section 'Polaronic dressing of the two-body bound state', paragraph discussing Fig. 5, before Conclusions]
    "This constructs the phase diagram in Fig. 1 , where the polaron regime is defined in the limit |ε (0) I | ≪ ωP 0 , whereas the dimer phase is given by |ε(0) I | ≫ ωP 0 . Here, the black dashed line denotes the crossover |ε(0) I |=ω P 0 ."

    The phase diagram's boundary is not obtained from the BSE pole condition or from the FWHM crossing; it is declared to be |ε_I^0|=ω_P^0, and the two regimes are defined by that same inequality. The central conclusion that weakly bound dimers break while tightly bound dimers survive is therefore a restatement of this definition rather than an independent output. The independently computed spectral functions do show broadening, so the paper is not wholly circular, but the phase diagram and the claimed crossover reduce by construction to the energy-ordering input.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Numerical paragraph after Eq. (5); used for FWHM analysis in Fig. 5]
    "In our numerical calculations, we add an imaginary termiγ X /En = 0.1 to the impurity Green’s function and use an energy cut-off of Λ/En = 144 in the BSE."

    Every impurity propagator used in the BSE carries the artificial width γ/E_n=0.1, so A(0,ω) has an intrinsic FWHM of at least order γ from the two impurity lines. The paper uses the FWHM to declare the dressed dimer 'ill-defined' ('the width of the dimer becomes much larger than the dimer energy, signaling the fading of this bound state'), but for the weakly bound case ε_I^0/E_n=-0.5 this width is 20% of the binding energy and directly inflates the reported FWHM. No γ-dependence, γ→0 limit, or convergence check is given, so the breakdown criterion is seeded by the numerical input rather than derived from polaron physics.

full rationale

The paper's core spectral calculations are not circular in the strongest sense: the impurity-impurity BSE is solved with a full impurity Green's function from the NSCT self-energy, and the resulting A(0,ω) are computed independently, with no parameter fitted to the claimed phase boundary. The NSCT self-energy is cited to external work (Rath & Schmidt), and the agreement with QMC is an independent check. However, two load-bearing steps reduce by construction. First, the phase diagram is explicitly defined by the inequality |ε_I^(0)| vs ω_P^0, and the same ratio is then presented as the explanation for dimer fragility; the dashed crossover line is therefore a definition, not a derived prediction. Second, the 'ill-defined dimer' diagnosis relies on the FWHM of the spectral function, and an artificial broadening γ/E_n=0.1 is inserted into every impurity propagator; for the weakly bound case this width is a substantial fraction of the binding energy, and no γ-dependence or γ→0 extrapolation is reported. The observed broadening is thus partly manufactured by the numerical input. These issues make the claimed crossover and breakdown boundary partially circular, while leaving the underlying spectral-function computations with independent content. Score 6 reflects this partial, but real, reduction-by-construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new fundamental entities are introduced; the dressed dimer is a composite quasiparticle built from the impurity and boson fields already in the Hamiltonian. The free parameters are the numerical broadening and cutoff, which directly affect the width-based breakdown claim.

free parameters (2)
  • gamma_X/E_n = 0.1
    Artificial imaginary broadening added to the impurity Green's function in the numerical BSE solution. It directly contributes to the FWHM of A(Q,omega), so the width-based statement that a dimer is 'ill-defined' depends on this choice.
  • Lambda/E_n = 144
    Energy cut-off used in the BSE integral. It is not physically motivated and no convergence study is reported.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The NSCT self-energy Eq. (5) is the correct impurity self-energy for a zero-temperature BEC with arbitrary a_IB and a_BB = 0.
    Invoked in Eq. (5) and used as input to the BSE. The paper acknowledges the strongly interacting Bose polaron remains an open problem and that NSCT is an approximation.
  • domain assumption Induced interactions between impurities are negligible; direct dimer formation dominates when the sound speed is much smaller than the dimer velocity.
    Stated in the limitations paragraph. If violated, the BSE misses bipolaron physics that could change the spectral function and phase diagram.
  • domain assumption Contact s-wave interactions with bosonic impurity statistics, equal masses m_c = m_b = m, zero temperature, and unit volume.
    Used in the Hamiltonian Eq. (1) and throughout; constrains applicability to 3D contact-interacting equal-mass systems.
  • standard math The Bethe-Salpeter equation (2) with the spectral representation (3) gives the impurity-impurity scattering matrix in the medium.
    The BSE is a standard many-body equation (Fetter and Walecka cited), but feeding an approximate impurity Green's function into it is the paper's method rather than an exact result.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Polaronic dressing of bound states." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DNFROLA2

@misc{pith2026241206520,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Polaronic dressing of bound states},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DNFROLA2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.06520}
}
read the original abstract

Polarons have emerged as a powerful concept across many-fields in physics to study an impurity coupled to a quantum bath. The interplay between impurity physics and the formation of composite objects remains a relevant problem to understand how few- and many-body states are robust towards complex environments and polaron physics. In most cases, impurities are point-like objects. The question we address here is how quasiparticle properties are affected when impurities possess an internal structure. The simplest yet fundamental structure for the impurity is a dimer state. Here, we investigate the polaronic properties of a dimer dressed by the elementary excitations of a bosonic bath. We solve the two-body impurity-impurity problem to determine the position and broadening of the bound state and consider the polaron dressing using a field-theory approach. We demonstrate the emergence of different dressed dimer regimes, where polaron dressing drives a dimer from a well-defined to an ill-defined bound state.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.06520 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Phase diagram of a dressed dimer in a BEC. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The spectral function of the impurity-impurity scat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Spectral function of the impurity-impurity scat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) In orange, the BSE equation for the impurity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Effective mass of a polaron,

    LD Landau and SI Pekar, “Effective mass of a polaron,” Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz18, 419–423 (1948)

    1948

  2. [2]

    Observation of at- tractive and repulsive polarons in a bose-einstein con- densate,

    Nils B Jørgensen, Lars Wacker, Kristoffer T Skalmstang, Meera M Parish, Jesper Levinsen, Rasmus S Christensen, Georg M Bruun, and Jan J Arlt, “Observation of at- tractive and repulsive polarons in a bose-einstein con- densate,” Physical review letters117, 055302 (2016)

    2016

  3. [3]

    Bose polarons in the strongly interacting regime,

    Ming-Guang Hu, Michael J Van de Graaff, Dhruv Kedar, John P Corson, Eric A Cornell, and Deborah S Jin, “Bose polarons in the strongly interacting regime,” Phys- ical review letters117, 055301 (2016)

    2016

  4. [4]

    Theory of polarons in many-valley crystals i. weak interaction between electron and lattice polariza- tion field,

    SI Pekar, “Theory of polarons in many-valley crystals i. weak interaction between electron and lattice polariza- tion field,” Soviet Physics Jetp28(1969)

    1969

  5. [5]

    Optical absorption in ionic crystals involv- ing small polarons,

    D. M. Eagles, “Optical absorption in ionic crystals involv- ing small polarons,” Phys. Rev.130, 1381–1400 (1963)

    1963

  6. [6]

    Fr¨ ohlich polaron and bipolaron: recent developments,

    Jozef T Devreese and Alexandre S Alexandrov, “Fr¨ ohlich polaron and bipolaron: recent developments,” Reports on Progress in Physics72, 066501 (2009)

    2009

  7. [7]

    Tunable po- larons of slow-light polaritons in a two-dimensional bose- einstein condensate,

    Fabian Grusdt and Michael Fleischhauer, “Tunable po- larons of slow-light polaritons in a two-dimensional bose- einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 053602 (2016)

    2016

  8. [8]

    Superfluid flow of polaron polari- tons above landau’s critical velocity,

    K. Knakkergaard Nielsen, A. Camacho-Guardian, G. M. Bruun, and T. Pohl, “Superfluid flow of polaron polari- tons above landau’s critical velocity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 035301 (2020)

    2020

Show all 92 references
  1. [9]

    Polariton dynamics in strongly interacting quantum many-body systems,

    A. Camacho-Guardian, K. Knakkergaard Nielsen, T. Pohl, and G. M. Bruun, “Polariton dynamics in strongly interacting quantum many-body systems,” Phys. Rev. Research2, 023102 (2020)

    2020

  2. [10]

    Exci- ton polarons in two-dimensional hybrid metal-halide per- ovskites,

    Ajay Ram Srimath Kandada and Carlos Silva, “Exci- ton polarons in two-dimensional hybrid metal-halide per- ovskites,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters11, 3173–3184 (2020)

    2020

  3. [11]

    Polarons in materials,

    Cesare Franchini, Michele Reticcioli, Martin Setvin, and Ulrike Diebold, “Polarons in materials,” Nature Reviews Materials6, 560–586 (2021)

    2021

  4. [12]

    Momentarily trapped exciton polaron in two-dimensional lead halide perovskites,

    Weijian Tao, Chi Zhang, Qiaohui Zhou, Yida Zhao, and Haiming Zhu, “Momentarily trapped exciton polaron in two-dimensional lead halide perovskites,” Nature Com- munications12, 1400 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    Optical control of exciton spin dynamics in layered metal halide perovskites via polaronic state for- mation,

    Sean A Bourelle, Franco V A Camargo, Soumen Ghosh, Timo Neumann, Tim WJ van de Goor, Ravichandran Shivanna, Thomas Winkler, Giulio Cerullo, and Felix Deschler, “Optical control of exciton spin dynamics in layered metal halide perovskites via polaronic state for- mation,” Natur...

    2022

  6. [14]

    Nucleus-nucleus inter- actions in the inner crust of neutron stars,

    D. Kobyakov and C. J. Pethick, “Nucleus-nucleus inter- actions in the inner crust of neutron stars,” Phys. Rev. C94, 055806 (2016)

    2016

  7. [15]

    Polaronic proton and dipro- ton clustering in neutron-rich matter,

    Hiroyuki Tajima, Hajime Moriya, Wataru Horiuchi, Eiji Nakano, and Kei Iida, “Polaronic proton and dipro- ton clustering in neutron-rich matter,” Physics Letters B851, 138567 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    Analyzing a bose polaron across resonant interactions,

    LA Pe˜ na Ardila, NB Jørgensen, T Pohl, S Giorgini, GM Bruun, and JJ Arlt, “Analyzing a bose polaron across resonant interactions,” Physical Review A99, 063607 (2019)

    2019

  9. [17]

    Bose polarons near quantum criticality,

    Zoe Z Yan, Yiqi Ni, Carsten Robens, and Martin W Zwierlein, “Bose polarons near quantum criticality,” Sci- ence368, 190–194 (2020)

    2020

  10. [18]

    Non-equilibrium quantum dynamics and formation of the bose polaron,

    Magnus G Skou, Thomas G Skov, Nils B Jørgensen, Kristian K Nielsen, Arturo Camacho-Guardian, Thomas Pohl, Georg M Bruun, and Jan J Arlt, “Non-equilibrium quantum dynamics and formation of the bose polaron,” Nature Physics17, 731–735 (2021)

    2021

  11. [19]

    Life and death of the bose polaron,

    Magnus G. Skou, Kristian K. Nielsen, Thomas G. Skov, Andreas M. Morgen, Nils B. Jørgensen, Arturo Camacho- Guardian, Thomas Pohl, Georg M. Bruun, and Jan J. Arlt, “Life and death of the bose polaron,” Phys. Rev. Res.4, 043093 (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    Universal quantum dynamics of bose polarons,

    Jiˇ r ´ ı Etrych, Gevorg Martirosyan, Alec Cao, Christo- pher J Ho, Zoran Hadzibabic, and Christoph Eigen, “Universal quantum dynamics of bose polarons,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.14816 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Field- theoretical study of the bose polaron,

    Steffen Patrick Rath and Richard Schmidt, “Field- theoretical study of the bose polaron,” Physical Review A88, 053632 (2013)

    2013

  14. [22]

    Impurity in a bose- einstein condensate: Study of the attractive and repulsive branch using quantum monte carlo methods,

    LA Pe˜ na Ardila and S Giorgini, “Impurity in a bose- einstein condensate: Study of the attractive and repulsive branch using quantum monte carlo methods,” Physical Review A92, 033612 (2015)

    2015

  15. [23]

    Quantum dynamics of ultracold bose polarons,

    Yulia E. Shchadilova, Richard Schmidt, Fabian Grusdt, and Eugene Demler, “Quantum dynamics of ultracold bose polarons,” Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 113002 (2016)

    2016

  16. [24]

    Strong-coupling bose polarons out of equilibrium: Dynamical renormalization-group ap- proach,

    Fabian Grusdt, Kushal Seetharam, Yulia Shchadilova, and Eugene Demler, “Strong-coupling bose polarons out of equilibrium: Dynamical renormalization-group ap- proach,” Physical Review A97, 033612 (2018)

    2018

  17. [25]

    Quasiparticle properties of a mobile impurity in a bose-einstein condensate,

    Rasmus Søgaard Christensen, Jesper Levinsen, and Georg M. Bruun, “Quasiparticle properties of a mobile impurity in a bose-einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 160401 (2015)

    2015

  18. [26]

    Phase diagram for strong-coupling bose po- larons,

    Arthur Christianen, J Ignacio Cirac, and Richard Schmidt, “Phase diagram for strong-coupling bose po- larons,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.09075 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Quantum behavior of a heavy im- purity strongly coupled to a bose gas,

    Jesper Levinsen, Luis A Pe˜ na Ardila, Shuhei M Yoshida, and Meera M Parish, “Quantum behavior of a heavy im- purity strongly coupled to a bose gas,” Physical Review Letters127, 033401 (2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    Finite- temperature behavior of the bose polaron,

    Jesper Levinsen, Meera M. Parish, Rasmus S. Chris- tensen, Jan J. Arlt, and Georg M. Bruun, “Finite- temperature behavior of the bose polaron,” Phys. Rev. A96, 063622 (2017)

    2017

  21. [29]

    Bose polarons at finite temperature and strong coupling,

    Nils-Eric Guenther, Pietro Massignan, Maciej Lewen- stein, and Georg M Bruun, “Bose polarons at finite temperature and strong coupling,” Physical review let- 7 ters120, 050405 (2018)

    2018

  22. [30]

    Fate of the bose polaron at finite temperature,

    Bernard Field, Jesper Levinsen, and Meera M Parish, “Fate of the bose polaron at finite temperature,” Physical Review A101, 013623 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    Quench dynamics of the ideal bose polaron at zero and nonzero temperatures,

    Moritz Drescher, Manfred Salmhofer, and Tilman Enss, “Quench dynamics of the ideal bose polaron at zero and nonzero temperatures,” Phys. Rev. A103, 033317 (2021)

    2021

  24. [32]

    Trapped ideal bose gas with a few heavy impurities,

    Orest Hryhorchak and Volodymyr Pastukhov, “Trapped ideal bose gas with a few heavy impurities,” Atoms11, 77 (2023)

    2023

  25. [33]

    Functional renormalisation group ap- proach to the finite-temperature bose polaron,

    Felipe Isaule, “Functional renormalisation group ap- proach to the finite-temperature bose polaron,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.04197 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Ground-state properties of dipolar bose polarons,

    L A Pe˜ na Ardila and T Pohl, “Ground-state properties of dipolar bose polarons,” Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics52, 015004 (2018)

    2018

  27. [35]

    Monte carlo methods for impurity physics in ultracold bose quantum gases,

    L. A. P. Ardila, “Monte carlo methods for impurity physics in ultracold bose quantum gases,” Nature Re- views Physics4, 214–214 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    Ionic polaron in a bose-einstein condensate,

    Grigory E Astrakharchik, Luis A Pe˜ na Ardila, Richard Schmidt, Krzysztof Jachymski, and Antonio Negretti, “Ionic polaron in a bose-einstein condensate,” Commu- nications Physics4, 1–8 (2021)

    2021

  29. [37]

    Charged polarons and molecules in a bose-einstein condensate,

    Esben Rohan Christensen, Arturo Camacho-Guardian, and Georg M. Bruun, “Charged polarons and molecules in a bose-einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 243001 (2021)

    2021

  30. [38]

    Mediated interactions between ions in quan- tum degenerate gases,

    Shanshan Ding, Michael Drewsen, Jan J. Arlt, and G. M. Bruun, “Mediated interactions between ions in quan- tum degenerate gases,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2203.02768 (2022), arXiv:2203.02768 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2022 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Charged impurities in a Bose- Einstein condensate: Many-body bound states and in- duced interactions,

    G. E. Astrakharchik, L. A. Pe˜ na Ardila, K. Jachym- ski, and A. Negretti, “Charged impurities in a Bose- Einstein condensate: Many-body bound states and in- duced interactions,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2206.03476 (2022), arXiv:2206.03476 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2022 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Modified mean-field ansatz for charged polarons in a bose-einstein condensate,

    Ubaldo Cavazos Olivas, Luis A. Pe˜ na Ardila, and Krzysztof Jachymski, “Modified mean-field ansatz for charged polarons in a bose-einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. A110, L011301 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    Non-equilibrium dynamics of dipo- lar polarons,

    Artem G Volosniev, Giacomo Bighin, Luis Santos, and Luis A Pe˜ na Ardila, “Non-equilibrium dynamics of dipo- lar polarons,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.17969 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Impurity in a bose-einstein condensate and the efimov effect,

    Jesper Levinsen, Meera M Parish, and Georg M Bruun, “Impurity in a bose-einstein condensate and the efimov effect,” Physical Review Letters115, 125302 (2015)

    2015

  35. [43]

    Visualizing the efimov correlation in bose polarons,

    Mingyuan Sun, Hui Zhai, and Xiaoling Cui, “Visualizing the efimov correlation in bose polarons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 013401 (2017)

    2017

  36. [44]

    Enhancing the efimov correlation in bose polarons with large mass imbalance,

    Mingyuan Sun and Xiaoling Cui, “Enhancing the efimov correlation in bose polarons with large mass imbalance,” Phys. Rev. A96, 022707 (2017)

    2017

  37. [45]

    Chemistry of a light impurity in a bose- einstein condensate,

    Arthur Christianen, J Ignacio Cirac, and Richard Schmidt, “Chemistry of a light impurity in a bose- einstein condensate,” Physical Review Letters128, 183401 (2022)

    2022

  38. [46]

    Bose polaron and the efimov effect: A gaussian-state approach,

    Arthur Christianen, J Ignacio Cirac, and Richard Schmidt, “Bose polaron and the efimov effect: A gaussian-state approach,” Physical Review A105, 053302 (2022)

    2022

  39. [47]

    Universality of an impurity in a bose- einstein condensate,

    Shuhei M. Yoshida, Shimpei Endo, Jesper Levinsen, and Meera M. Parish, “Universality of an impurity in a bose- einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. X8, 011024 (2018)

    2018

  40. [48]

    Universal aspects of a strongly interacting impu- rity in a dilute bose condensate,

    Pietro Massignan, Nikolay Yegovtsev, and Victor Gu- rarie, “Universal aspects of a strongly interacting impu- rity in a dilute bose condensate,” Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 123403 (2021)

    2021

  41. [49]

    Strongly interacting impurities in a dilute bose condensate,

    Nikolay Yegovtsev, Pietro Massignan, and Victor Gu- rarie, “Strongly interacting impurities in a dilute bose condensate,” Phys. Rev. A106, 033305 (2022)

    2022

  42. [50]

    Initial dynamics of quantum impu- rities in a bose–einstein condensate,

    Magnus G. Skou, Thomas G. Skov, Nils B. Jørgensen, and Jan J. Arlt, “Initial dynamics of quantum impu- rities in a bose–einstein condensate,” Atoms9(2021), 10.3390/atoms9020022

    2021 doi

  43. [51]

    Observation of 1/k 4-tails after expansion of bose- einstein condensates with impurities,

    Hugo Cayla, Pietro Massignan, Thierry Giamarchi, Alain Aspect, Christoph I Westbrook, and David Cl´ ement, “Observation of 1/k 4-tails after expansion of bose- einstein condensates with impurities,” Physical Review Letters130, 153401 (2023)

    2023

  44. [52]

    Lattice polarons across the superfluid to mott insulator transi- tion,

    VE Colussi, F Caleffi, C Menotti, and A Recati, “Lattice polarons across the superfluid to mott insulator transi- tion,” Physical Review Letters130, 173002 (2023)

    2023

  45. [53]

    Po- larons and bipolarons in a two-dimensional square lat- tice,

    Shanshan Ding, GA Dom ´ ınguez-Castro, Aleksi Julku, Arturo Camacho Guardian, and Georg M Bruun, “Po- larons and bipolarons in a two-dimensional square lat- tice,” SciPost Physics14, 143 (2023)

    2023

  46. [54]

    Bound impurities in a one-dimensional bose lattice gas: low-energy properties and quench-induced dynamics,

    Felipe Isaule, Abel Rojo-Franc` as, and Bruno Juli´ a-D ´ ıaz, “Bound impurities in a one-dimensional bose lattice gas: low-energy properties and quench-induced dynamics,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03070 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Polaron formation in insulators and the key role of hole scattering processes: Band insulators, charge density waves and mott transition,

    Ivan Amelio, Giacomo Mazza, and Nathan Gold- man, “Polaron formation in insulators and the key role of hole scattering processes: Band insulators, charge density waves and mott transition,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.01377 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Collective excitations of a bose–einstein condensate of hard-core bosons and their mediated interactions: from two-body bound states to mediated superfluidity,

    Moroni Santiago-Garc ´ ıa and Arturo Camacho-Guardian, “Collective excitations of a bose–einstein condensate of hard-core bosons and their mediated interactions: from two-body bound states to mediated superfluidity,” New Journal of Physics25, 093032 (2023)

    2023

  49. [57]

    Lattice polaron in a bose–einstein condensate of hard-core bosons,

    Moroni Santiago-Garc ´ ıa, Shunashi G Castillo-L´ opez, and Arturo Camacho-Guardian, “Lattice polaron in a bose–einstein condensate of hard-core bosons,” New Journal of Physics26, 063015 (2024)

    2024

  50. [58]

    Polaron spectra and edge singulari- ties for correlated flat bands,

    Dimitri Pimenov, “Polaron spectra and edge singulari- ties for correlated flat bands,” Phys. Rev. B109, 195153 (2024)

    2024

  51. [59]

    Chiral polaron formation on the edge of topolog- ical quantum matter,

    Amit Vashisht, Ivan Amelio, Laurens Vanderstraeten, Georg M Bruun, Oriana K Diessel, and Nathan Gold- man, “Chiral polaron formation on the edge of topolog- ical quantum matter,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.19093 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Topo- logical transport of mobile impurities,

    D. Pimenov, A. Camacho-Guardian, N. Goldman, P. Massignan, G. M. Bruun, and M. Goldstein, “Topo- logical transport of mobile impurities,” Phys. Rev. B 103, 245106 (2021)

    2021

  53. [61]

    Operator Valued Flow Equation Approach to the Bosonic Lattice Polaron: Dispersion Renormaliza- tion Beyond the Fr¨ ohlich Paradigm,

    Jan-Philipp Christ, Pit Bermes, and Fabian Grusdt, “Operator Valued Flow Equation Approach to the Bosonic Lattice Polaron: Dispersion Renormaliza- tion Beyond the Fr¨ ohlich Paradigm,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2411.19947 (2024), arXiv:2411.19947 [cond- mat.quant-gas]

    2024 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Rotation of quantum impurities in the presence of a many-body en- vironment,

    Richard Schmidt and Mikhail Lemeshko, “Rotation of quantum impurities in the presence of a many-body en- vironment,” Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 203001 (2015)

    2015

  55. [63]

    Deformation of a quantum many-particle system by a rotating impu- 8 rity,

    Richard Schmidt and Mikhail Lemeshko, “Deformation of a quantum many-particle system by a rotating impu- 8 rity,” Phys. Rev. X6, 011012 (2016)

    2016

  56. [64]

    Criti- cal slowdown of non-equilibrium polaron dynamics,

    K Knakkergaard Nielsen and LA Pe˜ na Ardila, “Criti- cal slowdown of non-equilibrium polaron dynamics,” New Journal of Physics21, 043014 (2019)

    2019

  57. [65]

    Mobile impu- rity in a bose-einstein condensate and the orthogonality catastrophe,

    Nils-Eric Guenther, Richard Schmidt, Georg M. Bruun, Victor Gurarie, and Pietro Massignan, “Mobile impu- rity in a bose-einstein condensate and the orthogonality catastrophe,” Phys. Rev. A103, 013317 (2021)

    2021

  58. [66]

    Impurity in a heteronuclear two-component bose mix- ture,

    “Impurity in a heteronuclear two-component bose mix- ture,” Physical Review A106, 023301 (2022)

    2022

  59. [67]

    Polaritons for testing the uni- versality of an impurity in a bose-einstein condensate,

    A. Camacho-Guardian, “Polaritons for testing the uni- versality of an impurity in a bose-einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. A108, L021303 (2023)

    2023

  60. [68]

    A unified theory of strong coupling Bose polarons: From repulsive polarons to non-Gaussian many-body bound states,

    Nader Mostaan, Nathan Goldman, and Fabian Grusdt, “A unified theory of strong coupling Bose polarons: From repulsive polarons to non-Gaussian many-body bound states,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2305.00835 (2023), arXiv:2305.00835 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2023

  61. [69]

    Perspective: Interactions mediated by atoms, photons, electrons, and excitons,

    Rosario Paredes, Georg Bruun, and Arturo Camacho- Guardian, “Perspective: Interactions mediated by atoms, photons, electrons, and excitons,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.13795 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Effective interac- tion of he 3 atoms in dilute solutions of he 3 in he4 at low temperatures,

    J. Bardeen, G. Baym, and D. Pines, “Effective interac- tion of he 3 atoms in dilute solutions of he 3 in he4 at low temperatures,” Phys. Rev.156, 207–221 (1967)

    1967

  63. [71]

    Induced interactions in dilute atomic gases and liquid helium mixtures,

    Zhenhua Yu and C. J. Pethick, “Induced interactions in dilute atomic gases and liquid helium mixtures,” Phys. Rev. A85, 063616 (2012)

    2012

  64. [72]

    Landau effective interaction between quasiparticles in a bose- einstein condensate,

    A. Camacho-Guardian and Georg M. Bruun, “Landau effective interaction between quasiparticles in a bose- einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. X8, 031042 (2018)

    2018

  65. [73]

    Uni- versal van der waals force between heavy polarons in su- perfluids,

    Keisuke Fujii, Masaru Hongo, and Tilman Enss, “Uni- versal van der waals force between heavy polarons in su- perfluids,” Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 233401 (2022)

    2022

  66. [74]

    Medium-induced interaction between impurities in a bose-einstein condensate,

    Moritz Drescher, Manfred Salmhofer, and Tilman Enss, “Medium-induced interaction between impurities in a bose-einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. A107, 063301 (2023)

    2023

  67. [75]

    Two Impurities in a Bose-Einstein Con- densate: From Yukawa to Efimov Attracted Polarons,

    Pascal Naidon, “Two Impurities in a Bose-Einstein Con- densate: From Yukawa to Efimov Attracted Polarons,” Journal of the Physical Society of Japan87, 043002 (2018), arXiv:1607.04507 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2018 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Bipolarons in a bose-einstein condensate,

    A. Camacho-Guardian, L. A. Pe˜ na Ardila, T. Pohl, and G. M. Bruun, “Bipolarons in a bose-einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 013401 (2018)

    2018

  69. [77]

    Po- laron interactions and bipolarons in one-dimensional bose gases in the strong coupling regime,

    M. Will, G. E. Astrakharchik, and M. Fleischhauer, “Po- laron interactions and bipolarons in one-dimensional bose gases in the strong coupling regime,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 103401 (2021)

    2021

  70. [78]

    Mediated interaction between polarons in a one-dimensional bose gas,

    Aleksandra Petkovi´ c and Zoran Ristivojevic, “Mediated interaction between polarons in a one-dimensional bose gas,” Phys. Rev. A105, L021303 (2022)

    2022

  71. [79]

    Mediated interactions between fermi polarons and the role of impurity quantum statistics,

    Cosetta Baroni, Bo Huang, Isabella Fritsche, Erich Dobler, Gregor Anich, Emil Kirilov, Rudolf Grimm, Miguel A Bastarrachea-Magnani, Pietro Massignan, and Georg M Bruun, “Mediated interactions between fermi polarons and the role of impurity quantum statistics,” Nature Physics20...

    2024

  72. [80]

    David Emin,Polarons(Cambridge University Press, 2013)

    2013

  73. [81]

    Fetter and J.D

    A.L. Fetter and J.D. Walecka,Quantum Theory of Many- Particle Systems, Dover Books on Physics Series (Dover Publications, 1971)

    1971

  74. [82]

    Impurities and polarons in bosonic quantum gases: a review on recent progress,

    F. Grusdt, N. Mostaan, E. Demler, and Luis A. Pe˜ na Ardila, “Impurities and polarons in bosonic quantum gases: a review on recent progress,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2410.09413 (2024), arXiv:2410.09413 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2024 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Fermi polaron-polaritons in charge-tunable atomically thin semiconductors,

    Meinrad Sidler, Patrick Back, Ovidiu Cotlet, Ajit Sri- vastava, Thomas Fink, Martin Kroner, Eugene Dem- ler, and Atac Imamoglu, “Fermi polaron-polaritons in charge-tunable atomically thin semiconductors,” Nature Physics13, 255–261 (2017)

    2017

  76. [84]

    Polari- tonic feshbach resonance,

    Naotomo Takemura, St´ ephane Trebaol, Michiel Wouters, Marcia T Portella-Oberli, and Beno ˆ ıt Deveaud, “Polari- tonic feshbach resonance,” Nature Physics10, 500–504 (2014)

    2014

  77. [85]

    Spectroscopic signa- tures of quantum many-body correlations in polariton microcavities,

    Jesper Levinsen, Francesca Maria Marchetti, Jonathan Keeling, and Meera M. Parish, “Spectroscopic signa- tures of quantum many-body correlations in polariton microcavities,” Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 266401 (2019)

    2019

  78. [86]

    Strong interactions and biexcitons in a polariton mixture,

    M. A. Bastarrachea-Magnani, A. Camacho-Guardian, M. Wouters, and G. M. Bruun, “Strong interactions and biexcitons in a polariton mixture,” Phys. Rev. B100, 195301 (2019)

    2019

  79. [87]

    Feshbach resonances in ultracold gases,

    Cheng Chin, Rudolf Grimm, Paul Julienne, and Eite Tiesinga, “Feshbach resonances in ultracold gases,” Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1225–1286 (2010)

    2010

  80. [88]

    Polarons and bipolarons in strongly interacting electron-phonon sys- tems,

    G. Wellein, H. R¨ oder, and H. Fehske, “Polarons and bipolarons in strongly interacting electron-phonon sys- tems,” Phys. Rev. B53, 9666–9675 (1996)

    1996

  81. [89]

    Mobile bipolaron,

    J. Bonc˘a, T. Katras˘nik, and S. A. Trugman, “Mobile bipolaron,” Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 3153–3156 (2000)

    2000

  82. [90]

    Bipolarons in the extended holstein hubbard model,

    J. Bonˇ ca and S. A. Trugman, “Bipolarons in the extended holstein hubbard model,” Phys. Rev. B64, 094507 (2001)

    2001

  83. [91]

    Two- dimensional hubbard-holstein bipolaron,

    A. Macridin, G. A. Sawatzky, and Mark Jarrell, “Two- dimensional hubbard-holstein bipolaron,” Phys. Rev. B 69, 245111 (2004)

    2004

  84. [92]

    Dataset: Polaronic dressing of bound states,

    Arturo Camacho Guardian and Luis Pe˜ na Ardila, “Dataset: Polaronic dressing of bound states,” (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.