Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 57 references

Manipulating the symmetry of photon-dressed electronic states

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Polarized photoemission shows a light-induced parity switch and a momentum-confined hot spot in Floquet sidebands of black phosphorus.

desk verdict A solid, well-supported TrARPES study of Floquet sidebands in black phosphorus: the parity-switch inference rests on a standard final-state assumption that is not independently tested, but the hot spot and two-path interference mechanism are convincing. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.06751 v1 pith:HCX5MWAL submitted 2024-12-09 cond-mat.mes-hall physics.optics

Changhua Bao , Michael Schüler , Teng Xiao , Fei Wang , Haoyuan Zhong , Tianyun Lin , Xuanxi Cai , Tianshuang Sheng
show 6 more authors
Xiao Tang Hongyun Zhang Pu Yu Zhiyuan Sun Wenhui Duan Shuyun Zhou
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.optics
keywords Floquet-Blochstatesblackphosphorusparitysymmetrytime-andangle-resolvedphotoemissionspectroscopymatrixelementstwo-bandmodelhotspotFloquetengineering
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports that a strong mid-infrared pump field can change the spatial parity of an electronic band in a solid, and that this change is directly visible in time- and angle-resolved photoemission. In black phosphorus, the first-order Floquet sideband of the valence band shows photoemission intensity opposite to the valence band at the $\Gamma$ point, which the authors interpret as a light-induced switch from odd to even parity under the glide mirror. Beyond the parity switch, they observe a sharp "hot spot" of intensity confined near $\Gamma$, flanked by zero-intensity nodes. The paper argues that this hot spot is a universal consequence of the mirror symmetries of the two bands and results from destructive interference between an interband and an intraband photoemission path in the dressed state. The broader significance is that TrARPES with polarization control can directly probe and engineer the symmetry and momentum-dependent wavefunction of Floquet-Bloch states.

What carries the argument

The argument rests on a two-band model of black phosphorus in which the TrARPES amplitude for the first-order sideband is the sum of two paths, $T_k(\omega)=T_{1k}(\omega)+T_{2k}(\omega)$, where $T_{1k}=M_{cv,k}M_{fc,k}/[\omega-(\varepsilon_c-\varepsilon_v)]$ is the interband path that promotes the electron into the conduction band before photoemission and $T_{2k}=M_{vv,k}M_{fv,k}/\omega$ is the intraband path that dresses the electron without changing its orbital character. Mirror symmetries fix the momentum dependence of the matrix elements ($M_{cv,k}=a$, $M_{vv,k}=b k$, etc.), so below the gap the two terms have opposite signs and must cancel at a finite momentum, giving the hot spot flanked by zero-intensity nodes. This identity is what lets the paper claim universality for the hot spot.

What would settle it

Measure the $n=1$ sideband intensity at $k=0$ with the probe polarization rotated continuously between the AC and ZZ directions: the parity-switch model predicts a $\cos^2\theta$ (or $\sin^2\theta$) angular dependence with a zero at the forbidden polarization, whereas any nonzero minimum would indicate a breakdown of the parity selection rule. Alternatively, vary the pump fluence and track the momentum of the zero-intensity nodes flanking the hot spot; the two-path interference model predicts the nodes move toward $\Gamma$ as the fluence (and thus the intraband weight) increases, and a stationary node would falsify the mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that photon-dressed electronic states inherit the parity of the pump field as a multiplicative quantum number, so an AC-polarized pump (odd under the glide mirror $S_g^x$) converts the odd-parity valence band into an even-parity first-order sideband: $|n{=}1\rangle = |\mathrm{odd}\rangle \otimes |\mathrm{odd}\rangle = |\mathrm{even}\rangle$. This parity switch is detected as a reversal of the AC-probe and ZZ-probe photoemission intensities at the $\Gamma$ point. The same measurement reveals a momentum-dependent wavefunction renormalization: near $\Gamma$ the sideband acquires up to ~20% conduction-band character under realistic fields, producing the "hot spot" and its surrounding nodes. The paper shows, with a two-band model constrained by the mirror symmetries $S_y$ and $S_g^x$, that the hot spot and the zero-intensity nodes are universal: they arise from destructive interference between the interband path $T_{1k}$ and the intraband path $T_{2k}$, whose relative sign is fixed by symmetry for below-gap pumping.

Load-bearing premise

The parity reading relies on the assumption that the photoelectron final state is even under reflection with respect to the scattering plane, so that AC-probe and ZZ-probe intensities cleanly isolate odd and even initial-state parity; if that selection rule is contaminated by final-state or laser-assisted photoemission effects, the intensity contrast at the $\Gamma$ point would not uniquely imply a parity switch.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Under below-gap pumping, the first-order Floquet sideband of the valence band should always show a momentum-confined intensity maximum with two zero-intensity nodes for any material whose conduction and valence bands have opposite parity under a glide mirror and share the same mirror $S_y$.
  • The parity switch at $\Gamma$ implies that polarization-resolved TrARPES can be used as a direct, momentum-resolved probe of the symmetry of Floquet-Bloch states, not just an indirect probe through transport or optics.
  • Because the hot spot's energy tracks the pump photon energy with slope 1, its position identifies the Floquet replica even when the replica overlaps other bands.
  • At higher pump fluence the conduction-band character of the sideband grows (up to ~20% at 800 kV/cm), so the hot spot intensity should increase relative to the sideband tail, a signature of stronger wavefunction hybridization.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The two-path interference mechanism suggests that the hot-spot position is tunable by the band gap, the effective masses, and the pump photon energy; for a fixed material one could map the zero-intensity nodes as a function of pump frequency to extract the interband matrix element $a$ and intraband coefficient $b$.
  • If the same measurement is extended to a material with inverted band ordering or different mirror eigenstates, the relative sign of $a\cdot c$ and $b\cdot d$ could flip, turning the destructive interference into constructive interference and replacing the hot spot by a dark minimum—this would provide a sharp test of the symmetry argument.
  • The parity-switch picture implies that a circularly or elliptically polarized pump could imprint a phase pattern on the sideband wavefunction, potentially connecting to Floquet topological phases with chiral edge states, though the paper does not demonstrate this.
  • Since the hot spot is confined to a narrow momentum window, energy- and momentum-resolved TrARPES could be used to extract the momentum-dependent hybridization between valence and conduction bands, providing a direct measurement of the Floquet wavefunction that is complementary to optical probes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports polarization-dependent TrARPES measurements of black phosphorus under a mid-infrared AC pump. It finds that the first-order Floquet sideband of the valence band shows an intensity contrast opposite to the valence band at the Γ point when probed with AC versus ZZ polarization, which is interpreted as a pump-induced parity switch from odd to even under the glide mirror Sg_x. The sideband also exhibits a momentum-confined hot spot near Γ. First-principles td-NEGF simulations and an analytical two-band model reproduce the hot spot and show that it arises from destructive interference between interband (VB→CB→final) and intraband (VB→VB→final) photoemission paths, with the cancellation enforced by the mirror symmetries Sy and Sg_x. The paper argues that the hot spot and its surrounding zero-intensity nodes are universal consequences of these symmetries.

Significance. If the parity interpretation holds, this work would establish polarization-dependent TrARPES as a direct probe of the symmetry of Floquet–Bloch states with energy and momentum resolution, a significant advance for Floquet engineering. The manuscript has notable strengths: the hot spot is reproduced by two independent theoretical approaches without being fit to the data, its pump-photon-energy scaling and temporal evolution strongly support the Floquet sideband assignment, and the two-band model provides a falsifiable mechanism—momentum-dependent destructive interference between interband and intraband paths—that explains the intensity modulation. The claimed universality of the hot spot, if substantiated, would be a conceptually important result linking band symmetry to light-induced wave-function engineering.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results (parity-selection argument) and Methods (TrARPES simulations, Eqs. (12)–(14))] The parity-switch conclusion at the Γ point rests on the assumption that the photoelectron final state is even under the glide mirror Sg_x. This assumption is load-bearing but is not tested independently. The Wannier-ARPES matrix elements in Methods, Eqs. (12)–(14), model the final state as a plane wave, which is even at k=0 by construction, and the two-band model in Eq. (17) likewise assumes an even final state. The measured AC/ZZ contrast for the valence band fixes the product of initial- and final-state parities, not the final-state parity separately. With an odd final state, the selection rules for AC and ZZ probes would be interchanged, so the observed opposite contrast at Γ would not uniquely imply a parity switch. I ask the authors to test the final-state assumption, for example with a one-step photoemission calculation using a time-reversed LEED final state at the 6.2 eV probe energy, or to provide independent evidence for the assumed glide eigenvalue of the final state.
  2. [Discussion (universality claim, Eq. (2)) and Methods (Analytical theory of a two-band model)] The universality of the hot spot and the zero-intensity nodes depends on the relative sign of a·c and b·d being fixed by the mirror symmetries. The main text states this constraint with a pointer to the Methods, but the Methods only derives explicit expressions for the specific two-band model (M_fc ≈ b_y1, M_fv ≈ −b_y1 iχk/G, M_cv ≈ iχ, M_vv = −k/m_v); a general symmetry derivation of the sign condition is not presented. Since an opposite sign would eliminate the destructive interference, the authors should either provide the general symmetry argument or qualify the claim that the hot spot is independent of material details.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Methods, Eq. (10) preceding text] There is a typo in the text above Eq. (10): "TrAPPES intensity" should be "TrARPES intensity".
  2. [Fig. 5d caption] The horizontal axis in Fig. 5d is labeled "k (Å⁻¹)" but the panel does not specify the momentum direction (AC or ZZ); please state which line in the Brillouin zone is plotted.
  3. [Introduction] The phrase "Floquet-Bloch states" appears once as "Floguet-Bloch states" in the Introduction; please correct the typo.
  4. [Fig. 4i] The caption defines error bars for the energy and photon-energy positions, but the plotted points in Fig. 4i do not appear to show them; please ensure the error bars are visible or correct the caption.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the parity-switch inference and hot-spot derivation rely on external selection-rule data and forward symmetry-constrained calculations rather than on fitted outputs or self-citation chains.

full rationale

The central claim — that the n=1 Floquet sideband of the VB switches parity and develops a momentum-confined hot spot — is not equivalent to any input by construction. The VB/CB parities under Sg_x are taken from the independent external ARPES study by Jung et al. (ref 34); the authors' own commentary (ref 35) is not the sole or load-bearing support. The AC/ZZ probe selection rule ('the final-state wavefunction φf_k is even under reflection with respect to the scattering plane', Results; ref 34) is an explicit auxiliary assumption, not the conclusion being derived: if that assumption failed, the parity inference would be weakened, but that is a correctness risk rather than circular reasoning. The hot spot is reproduced by two independent forward calculations: a td-NEGF first-principles simulation using Wannier-ARPES plane-wave final states (Methods Eqs. 10-14) and a two-band model whose matrix elements are fixed by symmetry (Mcv=a, Mvv=b·k, Mfc=c, Mfv=d·k; Eqs. 1-2). The destructive-interference zero follows mathematically from the below-gap sign condition, not from fitting the hot-spot intensity; parameters (Δ=0.33 eV, χ=3 eV Å, etc.) are experimental/literature values. The theoretical agreement validates the model's consistency with data, but it does not independently test the plane-wave final-state parity; this is the same auxiliary assumption and is not a circular input. Self-citations (refs 21,22) are contextual remarks about earlier Floquet band renormalization in BP and do not carry the argument. No step reduces a prediction to a fitted parameter or to a self-citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard symmetry assignments, a final-state parity assumption, first-order perturbation theory, and a low-energy two-band model. The free parameters are mostly standard material or experimental inputs; none are fitted to produce the hot spot.

free parameters (5)
  • Scissor band-gap correction = 330 meV
    Conduction bands shifted so the DFT gap matches the measured black phosphorus gap (Methods: 'A rigid-shift scissor operator was applied...'). Standard practice, but it is a parameter set by the experiment being modeled.
  • Interface field scaling s = 0.5
    Interpolates between surface and bulk effective pump field in Epump = s Ein + (1-s) Et (Methods Eq. 3). Fixed to roughly match experiment; paper states results are weakly dependent on s.
  • LAPE field scaling f = 0.5
    Scales the laser-assisted photoemission dressing field ELAPE = f(Ein + Er) (Methods Eq. 4); chosen to agree with Neppl et al.
  • Effective dielectric constant epsilon = 8
    Static value used in Fresnel coefficients for reflected and transmitted fields at the interface (Methods).
  • Two-band model parameter set = Delta=0.33 eV, chi=3 eV A, eta_x=1 eV A^2, gamma_x=4 eV A^2, omega_pump=0.24 eV, sigma2=0.03 eV
    Taken from known tight-binding model (ref 51) and experimental pump and probe conditions for the Fig. 5 plots; not fitted to the hot spot. Included for transparency.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Valence band (VB) is odd and conduction band (CB) is even under the glide mirror Sg_x in black phosphorus.
    Adopted from refs 34,35; underpins the parity selection rules and the two-band model.
  • domain assumption The final-state photoelectron wavefunction is even under reflection with respect to the scattering plane, and the probe polarization determines parity selectivity of the matrix element <phi_f|A.p|phi_i>.
    Invoked in Results and Methods; the parity switch inference depends on this selection rule.
  • domain assumption The pump is adiabatically turned on and electron-electron scattering is neglected, so the valence-band Floquet eigenstate is fully occupied.
    Methods: 'if the pump is adiabatically turned on and electron-electron scattering is neglected, the valence band Floquet eigenstate is fully occupied.' Used for spectral-weight interpretation.
  • standard math First-order time-dependent perturbation theory in the pump describes the n=1 sideband amplitude.
    Eq. (1) and Methods Eq. (23) expand the dressed Green's function to leading order in the pump; used for the two-path interference formula.
  • domain assumption The low-energy physics of bulk black phosphorus is captured by a two-band k.p model with weak kz dispersion.
    Methods extends the monolayer model to bulk by adding kz^2 terms; justified by weak interlayer tunneling and ARPES selecting near the Z point.
  • domain assumption The photoemission matrix elements for ZZ-probe arise from the finite photon momentum qy (quadrupole term).
    Methods: for ZZ-probe, the uniform-field matrix element vanishes by mirror symmetry; the nonzero signal comes from linear expansion in qy. This is needed for the hot spot in the ZZ-probe channel.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Manipulating the symmetry of photon-dressed electronic states." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HCX5MWAL

@misc{pith2026241206751,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Manipulating the symmetry of photon-dressed electronic states},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HCX5MWAL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.06751}
}
abstract

Strong light-matter interaction provides opportunities for tailoring the physical properties of quantum materials on the ultrafast timescale by forming photon-dressed electronic states, i.e., Floquet-Bloch states. While the light field can in principle imprint its symmetry properties onto the photon-dressed electronic states, so far, how to experimentally detect and further engineer the symmetry of photon-dressed electronic states remains elusive. Here by utilizing time- and angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (TrARPES) with polarization-dependent study, we directly visualize the parity symmetry of Floquet-Bloch states in black phosphorus. The photon-dressed sideband exhibits opposite photoemission intensity to the valence band at the $\Gamma$ point,suggesting a switch of the parity induced by the light field. Moreover, a "hot spot" with strong intensity confined near $\Gamma$ is observed, indicating a momentum-dependent modulation beyond the parity switch. Combining with theoretical calculations, we reveal the light-induced engineering of the wave function of the Floquet-Bloch states as a result of the hybridization between the conduction and valence bands with opposite parities, and show that the "hot spot" is intrinsically dictated by the symmetry properties of black phosphorus. Our work suggests TrARPES as a direct probe for the parity of the photon-dressed electronic states with energy- and momentum-resolved information, providing an example for engineering the wave function and symmetry of such photon-dressed electronic states via Floquet engineering.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Gross, D. J. The role of symmetry in fundamental physics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93, 14256–14259 (1996)

    work page 1996

  2. [2]

    Novoselov, K. S. et al. Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene. Nature 438, 197–200 (2005). 28

    work page 2005

  3. [3]

    Tilley, D. R. Superfluidity and superconductivity (Routledge, 2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    & Heinz, T

    Xu, X., Yao, W., Xiao, D. & Heinz, T. F. Spin and pseudospins in layered transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Phys. 10, 343–350 (2014)

    2014

  5. [5]

    & Hsieh, D

    Basov, D., Averitt, R. & Hsieh, D. Towards properties on demand in quantum materials. Nat. Mater. 16, 1077–1088 (2017)

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Du, L. et al. Engineering symmetry breaking in 2D layered materials. Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 193–206 (2021)

    2021

  7. [7]

    & Aoki, H

    Oka, T. & Aoki, H. Photovoltaic Hall effect in graphene. Phys. Rev. B 79, 081406 (2009)

    2009

  8. [8]

    & Demler, E

    Kitagawa, T., Oka, T., Brataas, A., Fu, L. & Demler, E. Transport properties of nonequilibrium systems under the application of light: Photoinduced quantum Hall insulators without Landau levels. Phys. Rev. B 84, 235108 (2011)

    work page 2011

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    H., Refael, G

    Lindner, N. H., Refael, G. & Galitski, V . Floquet topological insulator in semiconductor quantum wells. Nat. Phys. 7, 490–495 (2011)

    2011

  2. [10]

    & Kitamura, S

    Oka, T. & Kitamura, S. Floquet engineering of quantum materials. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 10, 387–408 (2019)

    2019

  3. [11]

    Rudner, M. S. & Lindner, N. H. Band structure engineering and non-equilibrium dynamics in Floquet topological insulators. Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 229–244 (2020)

    2020

  4. [12]

    de la Torre, A. et al. Colloquium: Nonthermal pathways to ultrafast control in quantum materials. Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 041002 (2021). 29

    2021

  5. [13]

    & Zhou, S

    Bao, C., Tang, P., Sun, D. & Zhou, S. Light-induced emergent phenomena in 2D materials and topological materials. Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 33–48 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    & Rubio, A

    Bloch, J., Cavalleri, A., Galitski, V ., Hafezi, M. & Rubio, A. Strongly correlated electron– photon systems. Nature 606, 41–48 (2022)

    2022

  7. [15]

    H ¨ubener, H. et al. Engineering quantum materials with chiral optical cavities. Nat. Mater. 20, 438–442 (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    Kobayashi, Y . et al. Floquet engineering of strongly driven excitons in monolayer tungsten disulfide. Nat. Phys. 19, 171–176 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    & Gedik, N

    Wang, Y ., Steinberg, H., Jarillo-Herrero, P. & Gedik, N. Observation of Floquet-Bloch states on the surface of a topological insulator. Science 342, 453–457 (2013)

    2013

  10. [18]

    Mahmood, F. et al. Selective scattering between Floquet–Bloch and Volkov states in a topo- logical insulator. Nat. Phys. 12, 306–310 (2016)

    2016

  11. [19]

    McIver, J. W. et al. Light-induced anomalous Hall effect in graphene. Nat. Phys. 16, 38–41 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    Shan, J.-Y . et al. Giant modulation of optical nonlinearity by Floquet engineering. Nature 600, 235–239 (2021)

    2021

  13. [21]

    Zhou, S. et al. Pseudospin-selective Floquet band engineering in black phosphorus. Nature 614, 75–80 (2023). 30

    2023

  14. [22]

    Zhou, S. et al. Floquet engineering of black phosphorus upon below-gap pumping. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 116401 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    Aeschlimann, S. et al. Survival of Floquet–Bloch states in the presence of scattering. Nano Lett. 21, 5028–5035 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    Park, S. et al. Steady Floquet–Andreev states in graphene Josephson junctions. Nature 603, 421–426 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    Ito, S. et al. Build-up and dephasing of Floquet–Bloch bands on subcycle timescales. Nature 616, 696–701 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    Kim, J. et al. Ultrafast generation of pseudo-magnetic field for valley excitons in WSe2 mono- layers. Science 346, 1205–1208 (2014)

    2014

  19. [27]

    Sie, E. J. et al. Valley-selective optical stark effect in monolayer WS2. Nat. Mater.14, 290–294 (2015)

    2015

  20. [28]

    Sie, E. J. & Sie, E. J. Large, valley-exclusive Bloch-Siegert shift in monolayer WS 2. Science 355, 1066–1069 (2017)

    2017

  21. [29]

    Yang, X. et al. Lightwave-driven gapless superconductivity and forbidden quantum beats by terahertz symmetry breaking. Nat. Photonics 13, 707–713 (2019)

    2019

  22. [30]

    Sirica, N. et al. Photocurrent-driven transient symmetry breaking in the Weyl semimetal TaAs. Nat. Mater. 21, 62–66 (2022). 31

    2022

  23. [31]

    E., Averbukh, V

    Alon, O. E., Averbukh, V . & Moiseyev, N. Selection rules for the high harmonic generation spectra. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3743 (1998)

    1998

  24. [32]

    Saito, N. et al. Observation of selection rules for circularly polarized fields in high-harmonic generation from a crystalline solid. Optica 4, 1333–1336 (2017)

    2017

  25. [33]

    Nagai, K. et al. Dynamical symmetry of strongly light-driven electronic system in crystalline solids. Commun. Phys. 3, 137 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    Jung, S. W. et al. Black phosphorus as a bipolar pseudospin semiconductor. Nat. Mater. 19, 277–281 (2020)

    2020

  27. [35]

    & Zhou, S

    Bao, C. & Zhou, S. Black phosphorous for pseudospintronics. Nat. Mater. 19, 263–264 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    A., He, Y

    Sobota, J. A., He, Y . & Shen, Z.-X. Angle-resolved photoemission studies of quantum mate- rials. Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025006 (2021)

    2021

  29. [37]

    & Damascelli, A

    Boschini, F., Zonno, M. & Damascelli, A. Time-resolved ARPES studies of quantum materi- als. Rev. Mod. Phys. 96, 015003 (2024)

    2024

  30. [38]

    Sch ¨uler, M. et al. Local Berry curvature signatures in dichroic angle-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy from two-dimensional materials. Sci. Adv. 6, eaay2730 (2020)

    2020

  31. [39]

    Sch ¨uler, M. et al. How circular dichroism in time-and angle-resolved photoemission can be used to spectroscopically detect transient topological states in graphene. Phys. Rev. X 10, 041013 (2020). 32

    2020

  32. [40]

    & Shen, Z.-X

    Damascelli, A., Hussain, Z. & Shen, Z.-X. Angle-resolved photoemission studies of the cuprate superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 473 (2003)

    2003

  33. [41]

    Keunecke, M. et al. Electromagnetic dressing of the electron energy spectrum of Au(111) at high momenta. Phys. Rev. B 102, 161403 (2020)

    2020

  34. [42]

    Neppl, S. et al. Direct observation of electron propagation and dielectric screening on the atomic length scale. Nature 517, 342–346 (2015)

    2015

  35. [43]

    Giannozzi, P. et al. QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21, 395502 (2009)

    2009

  36. [44]

    van Setten, M. et al. The PseudoDojo: Training and grading a 85 element optimized norm- conserving pseudopotential table. Comp. Phys. Commun. 226, 39–54 (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    Pizzi, G. et al. Wannier90 as a community code: new features and applications. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 32, 165902 (2020)

    2020

  38. [46]

    R., Wang, X., Vanderbilt, D

    Yates, J. R., Wang, X., Vanderbilt, D. & Souza, I. Spectral and Fermi surface properties from Wannier interpolation. Phys. Rev. B 75, 195121 (2007)

    2007

  39. [47]

    A., Murakami, Y ., Jia, C

    Sch ¨uler, M., Marks, J. A., Murakami, Y ., Jia, C. & Devereaux, T. P. Gauge invariance of light- matter interactions in first-principle tight-binding models. Phys. Rev. B 103, 155409 (2021)

    2021

  40. [48]

    & Sentef, M

    Sch ¨uler, M. & Sentef, M. A. Theory of subcycle time-resolved photoemission: Application to terahertz photodressing in graphene. J. Electron Spectrosc. 253, 147121 (2021). 33

    2021

  41. [49]

    P., Zwartsenberg, B., Elfimov, I

    Day, R. P., Zwartsenberg, B., Elfimov, I. S. & Damascelli, A. Computational framework chinook for angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy. npj Quantum Mater. 4, 54 (2019)

    2019

  42. [50]

    Beaulieu, S. et al. Unveiling the orbital texture of 1T-TiTe2 using intrinsic linear dichroism in multidimensional photoemission spectroscopy. npj Quantum Mater. 6, 6 (2021)

    2021

  43. [51]

    Pereira, J. M. & Katsnelson, M. I. Landau levels of single-layer and bilayer phosphorene. Phys. Rev. B 92, 075437 (2015)

    2015

  44. [52]

    & van Leeuwen, R

    Stefanucci, G. & van Leeuwen, R. Nonequilibrium Many-Body Theory of Quantum Systems: A Modern Introduction (Cambridge University Press, 2013)

    2013

  45. [53]

    Hartmut Haug, A.-P. J. Quantum Kinetics in Transport and Optics of Semiconductors (Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008)

    2008

  46. [54]

    Han, C. et al. Electronic structure of black phosphorus studied by angle-resolved photoemis- sion spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 90, 085101 (2014)

    2014

  47. [55]

    Qiao, J., Kong, X., Hu, Z.-X., Yang, F. & Ji, W. High-mobility transport anisotropy and linear dichroism in few-layer black phosphorus. Nat. Commun. 5, 4475 (2014)

    2014

  48. [56]

    Margot, F. et al. Electronic structure of few-layer black phosphorus from µ-ARPES. Nano Lett. 23, 6433–6439 (2023)

    2023

  49. [57]

    Low, T. et al. Tunable optical properties of multilayer black phosphorus thin films. Phys. Rev. B 90, 075434 (2014). 34 Acknowledgements We thank Ren-Bao Liu for helpful discussions. This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 5238820...

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.