Quasi-stationary evolution of cubic-quintic NLSE drop-like solitons in DNA-protein systems

J. R. Collantes-Collantes; M. A. Ag\"uero-Granados; O. Pav\'on-Torres

Quasi-stationary evolution of cubic-quintic NLSE drop-like solitons in DNA-protein systems

T0 review · 1 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Viscous damping shrinks DNA drop-like solitons while their velocity stays constant.

desk verdict The paper's central adiabatic law, Eq. (32), has the wrong sign and a spurious epsilon: it predicts growth where the text and Fig. 2 claim decay, so the main result is wrong as written. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.06854 v2 pith:A5W6LASW submitted 2024-12-08 physics.bio-ph

O. Pavón-Torres , J. R. Collantes-Collantes , M. A. Agüero-Granados This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.bio-ph

keywords DNA-proteinsystemscubic-quinticNLSEdropsolitonsquasi-stationarymethodgeneralizedcoherentstatesviscousdampingsaturablenonlinearitytranscription

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper derives an effective cubic-quintic nonlinear Schrödinger equation for DNA–protein dynamics from a plane-base rotator model with generalized coherent states, then asks what a viscous surrounding medium does to its drop-like soliton solutions. Using the quasi-stationary perturbation method, it obtains solvability conditions that force the soliton velocity $V$ to remain constant while the amplitude $A$ obeys $\partial A/\partial T = \sqrt{2}\epsilon(3-4\alpha A^2)E/3$, with $E$ the soliton energy. The first-order correction to the soliton profile is constructed explicitly, so the damped shape is known. A sympathetic reader would care because this gives an analytic handle on how DNA open states and their transport are modified by dissipation, with potential implications for transcription.

What carries the argument

The engine of the argument is the quasi-stationary (multi-scale) perturbation method of Kodama and Ablowitz, applied to the perturbed cubic-quintic NLSE with the drop-soliton solution as the unperturbed carrier. The method expands the field in powers of the small damping coefficient $\epsilon$, separates real and imaginary first-order corrections, and imposes solvability (secularity) conditions on the self-adjoint operators $L_1$ and $L_2$; these conditions yield the adiabatic laws for $A$ and $V$. The drop soliton itself is the named central object: a localized solution of the cubic-quintic NLSE whose envelope is $A(1+\sqrt{1-\frac{4}{3}\alpha A^2}\cosh(\sqrt{2}A(\theta-\theta_0)))^{-1/2}$. The weakly saturable approximation $G(I)=F(I)/(1+I)\approx F(I)(1-I)$ is the step that converts the saturable DNA model into the cubic-quintic NLSE that supports this soliton.

What would settle it

Compute the dimensionless amplitude $|\psi|^2$ of the drop soliton for the parameter values in Section 4 and check whether it is small compared with 1; if it is not, Eq. (10) is not a valid reduction and the decay law (32) would not apply. Alternatively, numerically evolve the original saturable equation (8) with the damping term $-i\epsilon\varphi$ and compare the resulting amplitude decay with Eq. (32): agreement would validate the weak-saturation step, disagreement would falsify the paper's central quantitative claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the one-soliton (drop) solution of the cubic-quintic NLSE, when perturbed by the damping term $-i\epsilon\varphi$, evolves quasi-stationarily so that $\partial V/\partial T = 0$ and $\partial A/\partial T = \sqrt{2}\epsilon(3-4\alpha A^2)E/3$, where $E=\int |\varphi|^2 dx$. In plain terms, the viscosity drains energy from the excitation—its amplitude decays on a slow time scale—but the soliton's velocity is untouched. The paper further provides the explicit first-order field correction $\varphi_1 = \phi_1 + i\psi_1$ in Eqs. (35) and (37), and assembles the full solution (40). It also notes that the quintic term can produce opposite regimes: in an absorbing medium the soliton may self-compress, while in an amplifying medium it may self-spread.

Load-bearing premise

The saturable nonlinearity of the DNA model is replaced by its small-amplitude Taylor expansion $G(I)\approx F(I)(1-I)$, and the paper does not show that the soliton amplitudes used satisfy $|\psi|^2\ll 1$; if they do not, the cubic-quintic equation (10) and everything built on it would not describe the DNA-protein system.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The amplitude decay rate in Eq. (32) grows linearly with the damping coefficient $\epsilon$ and with the soliton energy $E$, so larger or more energetic openings are damped faster in absolute terms.
Because $\partial V/\partial T=0$, a moving open state does not slow down as it loses amplitude; the dissipation changes the size of the bubble, not its propagation speed.
The explicit first-order solution (40) lets one compute how the hydrogen-bond and peptide displacements $X$ and $Y$ (Eqs. (6)-(7)) are deformed by damping, connecting soliton decay to measurable local distortions.
The same quasi-stationary machinery applies to any perturbation $R(\varphi)$ of the cubic-quintic NLSE, so the result extends beyond viscous damping to periodic or pulse-like disturbances of a DNA chain.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the weakly saturable approximation fails at the amplitudes relevant for transcription bubbles, the predicted decay law (32) would not hold for real DNA; this is a testable condition that can be checked from the parameter values in Section 4.
The constancy of velocity under damping suggests that viscosity alone would not stall a transcription bubble; stalling would require a mechanism that also couples to the soliton's position or phase.
The same adiabatic-decay framework could be applied to the hyperbolic (anti-)compactons mentioned in the paper, yielding explicit amplitude laws for those non-classical open-state carriers.
A numerical simulation of the original saturable equation (8) with damping would provide a direct check of whether the cubic-quintic reduction captures the actual quasi-stationary evolution.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Punchline: the central analytical result is not self-consistent. Eq. (32) gives dA/dT = sqrt(2) epsilon (3 - 4 alpha A^2) E / 3. For alpha = 0 this is dA/dT = +2 epsilon A, i.e. growth, not damping. The Fredholm solvability condition in Eq. (31b), with ImF = -(phi0_T + phi0), actually yields a negative rate, and the extra epsilon is spurious because T = epsilon t already absorbs the slow scale. So the paper's own equation contradicts its stated decay and the plotted decay in Fig. 2. That is a load-bearing flaw, not a typo.

What is genuinely good: the derivation from the plane-base rotator Hamiltonian through SU(2)/U(1) coherent states to the cubic-quintic NLSE is clearly laid out, and the weakly saturable approximation is a reasonable route to a tractable equation. The paper is honest that the governing equation and the quasi-stationary method come from earlier work by the same group [38, 79, 80]; the reparameterization for a DNA-protein system with viscous damping is the only new piece, and that is acknowledged.

Soft spots, in proportion: the sign/scale error in Eq. (32) alone warrants rejection of the current version. The solvability calculation is compressed to "upon integrating", hiding the algebra. The first-order solution (35)-(37) is not derived in the text and appears to omit A_T-dependent terms, so it is not independently checkable from the paper. The weakly saturable approximation requires |psi|^2 << 1, but the paper never checks that the soliton amplitudes used satisfy this. The application to transcription in Section 4 is qualitative, and the paper itself admits that effects on compactons and anti-compactons are left to future work. The citation pattern is not a problem: heavy self-citation is appropriate here because the model and method are the authors' own.

For whom: the nonlinear-DNA community and anyone working on perturbed cubic-quintic solitons. If Eq. (32) is corrected and the first-order solutions are verified, this becomes a modest but citable application of an existing method. As it stands, I would not cite it.

Recommendation: this deserves a serious referee rather than a desk reject, because the error is concrete and the modeling framework has substance. But the referee must demand a corrected Eq. (32) and a checkable derivation of the first-order corrections before anything else.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper models nonlinear molecular excitations in a DNA-protein system starting from a plane-base rotator Hamiltonian and generalized coherent states. A weakly saturable approximation reduces the effective equation to a cubic-quintic nonlinear Schrödinger equation, and a viscous environment is modelled by adding a linear damping term. The authors apply the Kodama-Ablowitz quasi-stationary perturbation method to a 'drop' soliton solution, claim to derive the adiabatic evolution of its velocity and amplitude, construct the first-order perturbed correction, and discuss implications for DNA transcription. The central quantitative claim is Eq. (32), which states that the velocity is constant and that the amplitude obeys dA/dT = sqrt(2)epsilon(3-4 alpha A^2)E/3, leading the authors to conclude that the soliton decays while its velocity remains unchanged.

Significance. If the main result were correct, the paper would provide an analytic prediction for the damping of localized nonlinear excitations in DNA induced by a viscous medium and would extend earlier quasi-stationary studies from optical fibres and lipid membranes to DNA-protein systems. The manuscript has useful strengths: it works with an explicit analytic drop-soliton solution of the cubic-quintic equation, it incorporates parameter values from earlier numerical work, and it connects the calculation to the biologically important transcription process. However, the central adiabatic law as printed is internally inconsistent: the sign and scaling in Eq. (32) contradict the paper's own solvability integral and would imply growth rather than decay in the cubic limit. Because this result is the basis for the perturbed solution and for the biological discussion, the paper in its current form does not establish its main claim. The missing derivations and the unjustified parameter assumptions further lower the present reliability of the conclusions.

major comments (1)

[Sec. 3.2, Eqs. (30b), (31b), (32)]

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the adiabatic damping law is claimed output of Fredholm secularity conditions on the perturbed cubic-quintic NLSE, not a fitted or self-defined input.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is explicit: Eq. (19) gives the damped cubic-quintic NLSE, the quasi-stationary ansatz is introduced in Eqs. (23)-(28), the first-order system is formed in Eqs. (29)-(30), and the adiabatic laws in Eq. (32) are presented as the results of the Fredholm solvability conditions (31). The damping term -i eps phi is an input of the perturbed model, not a conclusion obtained by fitting or by definition. The amplitude and velocity laws are outputs of the secularity conditions, and no data set or fitted parameter is used to produce them. The unperturbed drop-soliton solution (21) is taken from prior work [88], and the coherent-state Hamiltonian model is taken from [38]; these are standard inputs to a perturbation calculation, and the present claim stands or falls on the algebra of Sec. 3 rather than on those citations alone. Self-citations [38,79,80] supply the model, an analogous optical-fibre calculation, and a lipid-membrane application; none is invoked as a uniqueness theorem or as the sole justification for the central result. The weakly saturable approximation and the smallness of eps are stated assumptions, not circular reasoning. The skeptic's objection that Eq. (32) carries an internal sign or eps-scaling inconsistency, if correct, would be a correctness defect in the printed formula, not a case of the result being equivalent to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model relies on a chain of assumptions from prior literature (rotator model, coherent states, continuum limit, symmetry), plus an unvalidated weakly saturable approximation. The only genuinely new input is the damping term, which is inserted by hand. Numerically, α, ϵ, A, C, v1, v2 remain free; no fitted values or predictions are computed.

free parameters (5)

α (quintic coefficient in Eq. 19)
Set by α=-2k5/k3 from Eq. (11), but the paper never evaluates β, γ, k3, k5 numerically, so α remains an undetermined parameter of the soliton family.
ϵ (dimensionless damping coefficient)
The physical damping ϵ≈6×10^-11 kg/s is given in Section 4, but the ϵ in Eq. (19) is dimensionless. No scaling is provided to connect them, so the assumption 0<ϵ≪1 is unverified.
A (initial soliton amplitude)
Initial amplitude of the drop soliton; no value is specified for the analytical results or for Figure 2.
C (integration constant)
Arbitrary constant introduced by the boundary condition φ1|θ=0=C in Section 3.2; it is not determined by the physics.
v1, v2 (velocities of hydrogen atom and peptide)
Eq. (41) imposes one relation between v1 and v2; the paper states they can be chosen arbitrarily, so no predictive values are derived.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption The plane-base rotator Hamiltonian (1) and the generalized coherent states expectation values (2) describe DNA-protein dynamics.
Taken from prior work [31,32,35,38]; the paper does not derive or test this model against data.
domain assumption The continuous limit (4) applies: excitation length >> inter-site distance a.
Standard continuum approximation; stated without validation for the DNA soliton sizes discussed.
domain assumption The two strands obey the symmetry ψ = -ξ.
Invoked in Section 2.2 to reduce the coupled equations to Eq. (8); no justification is given.
domain assumption Weakly saturable approximation (1+I)^{-1} ≈ 1-I.
Used in Section 2.2 to obtain Eq. (10); valid only for small |ψ|^2, a condition not verified for the soliton solutions.
domain assumption Viscous damping is modeled by the linear term -iϵφ in Eq. (19).
The paper assumes the solvent acts as a linear loss; no derivation from hydrodynamics is given.
domain assumption The quasi-stationary method of Kodama and Ablowitz [87] is applicable with 0<ϵ≪1.
Standard perturbation method, but the smallness of the dimensionless ϵ is not established from the quoted dimensional value.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quasi-stationary evolution of cubic-quintic NLSE drop-like solitons in DNA-protein systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/A5W6LASW

@misc{pith2026241206854,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quasi-stationary evolution of cubic-quintic NLSE drop-like solitons in DNA-protein systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/A5W6LASW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.06854}
}

read the original abstract

Nonlinear molecular excitations in DNA have traditionally been modelled using the nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation (NLSE). An alternative approach is based on the plane-base rotator model and the SU(2)/U(1) generalized spin coherent states, which leads to a cubic quintic NLSE. Higher-order nonlinearities are particularly useful for modelling complex interactions, such as those in DNA-protein systems, where multiple competing forces play a significant role. Additionally, the surrounding viscous medium introduces dissipative forces that affect the propagation of molecular excitations, leading to energy dissipation and damping effects. These damping effects are modelled using the quasi-stationary method, which describes the system's near-equilibrium behaviour. In this work, we explore the evolution of nonlinear molecular excitations in DNA-protein systems, accounting for damping effects, and discuss potential applications to the transcription process.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.06854 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Quasi-stationary evolution of the soliton-like solution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Schematic representation of the transcription process. The transcription process begins [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

[1]

The impact of the sequence-dependent physical properties of DNA on chromatin dynamics

Aditi Biswas, Aakash Basu. The impact of the sequence-dependent physical properties of DNA on chromatin dynamics. Current Opinion in Structural Biology 2023, 83:102698

2023
[2]

Nonlinearity 17, R1–R40 (2004)

Michel Peyrard, Nonlinear dynamics and statistical physics of DNA. Nonlinearity 17, R1–R40 (2004)

2004
[3]

Bianca, M

C. Bianca, M. Delitala, On the modelling of genetic mutations and immune system competition. Com- puters and Mathematics with Applications 61, 2362-2375 (2011)

2011
[4]

PLoS Genet 14 (11), e1007823 (2018)

Brown AJ, Mao P, Smerdon MJ, Wyrick JJ, Roberts SA, Nucleosome positions establish an extended mutation signature in melanoma. PLoS Genet 14 (11), e1007823 (2018)

2018
[5]

Cell 175, 1074–1087 (2018)

Pich et al., Somatic and Germline Mutation Periodicity Follow the Orientation of the DNA Minor Groove around Nucleosomes. Cell 175, 1074–1087 (2018)

2018
[6]

Wyrick, Mutperiod: Analysis of periodic mutation rates in nu- cleosomes

Benjamin Morledge-Hampton, John J. Wyrick, Mutperiod: Analysis of periodic mutation rates in nu- cleosomes. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal 19, 4177-4183 (2021)

2021
[7]

Amar Singh and Navin Singh, Pulling short DNA molecules having defects on different locations. Phys. Rev. E 92, 032703 (2015)

2015
[8]

et al, The central role of DNA damage in the ageing process

Schumacher, B., Pothof, J., Vijg, J. et al, The central role of DNA damage in the ageing process. Nature 592, 695–703 (2021)

2021

Show all 90 references

[9]

H., Gronenborn, A

Werner, M. H., Gronenborn, A. M. & Clore, G. M. Intercalation, DNA kinking, and the control of transcription. Science 271, 778–784 (1996)

1996
[10]

Dickerson, R. E. DNA bending: The prevalence of kinkiness and the virtues of normality. Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 1906–1926 (1998)

1998
[11]

Allemann, Martin Egli

Rudolf K. Allemann, Martin Egli. DNA recognition and bending. Chemistry & Biology. Volume 4, Issue 9, Pages 643-650 (1997)

1997
[12]

Chevizovich D, Michieletto D, Mvogo A, Zakiryanov F, Zdravkovi´ c S, A review on nonlinear DNA physics. R. Soc. Open Sci. 7, 200774 (2020)

2020
[13]

Likhachev, A

I.V. Likhachev, A. S. Shigaev, V.D. Lakhno, On the thermodynamics of DNA double strand in the Peyrard-Bishop-Dauxois model. Physics Letters A 510, 129547 (2024). 14

2024
[14]

Brizar Okaly, Alain Mvogo, R

J. Brizar Okaly, Alain Mvogo, R. Laure Woulach´ e, T. Cr´ epin Kofan´ e, Nonlinear dynamics of DNA systems with inhomogeneity effects. Chinese Journal of Physics 56 (5), 2613-2626 (2018)

2018
[15]

Ayyappam, N

Christy Maria Joy, N. Ayyappam, N. Ayyappam, Dynamics of Peyrard Bishop model of DNA under the influence of solvent interaction. Materials Today: Proceedings 51, 1777–1781 (2022)

2022
[16]

Journal of Modern Physics 12, 1843-1865 (2021)

Nkeh Oma Nfor, Higher Order Periodic Base Pairs Opening in a Finite Stacking Enthalpy DNA Model. Journal of Modern Physics 12, 1843-1865 (2021)

2021
[17]

Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 181, 114706 (2024)

Arnaud Djine, Nkeh Oma Nfor, Guy Roger Deffo, Serge Bruno Yamgou´ e, Higher order investigation on modulated waves in the Peyrard–Bishop–Dauxois DNA model. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 181, 114706 (2024)

2024
[18]

J. B. Okaly, A. Mvogo, C. B. Tabi, H. P. Ekobena Fouda, and T. C. Kofan´ e, Base pair opening in a damped helicoidal Joyeux-Buyukdagli model of DNA in an external force field. Phys. Rev. E 102, 062402 (2020)

2020
[19]

Ain Shams Engineering Journal 15, 102864 (2024)

Muhammad Bilal Riaz, Marriam Fayyaz, Riaz Ur Rahman, Jan Martinovic, Osman Tun¸ c, Analytical study of fractional DNA dynamics in the Peyrard-Bishop oscillator-chain model. Ain Shams Engineering Journal 15, 102864 (2024)

2024
[20]

Kadiri Haritha and K V S Shiv Chaitanya, Statistical mechanics of DNA mutation using SUSY quantum mechanics. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 54, 305601 (15pp) (2021)

2021
[21]

Physica A 493, 286-300 (2018)

Franciele Polotto, Elso Drigo Filho, Jorge Chahine, Ronaldo Junio de Oliveira, Supersymmetric quan- tum mechanics method for the Fokker–Planck equation with applications to protein folding dynamics. Physica A 493, 286-300 (2018)

2018
[22]

Yakushevich

Ludmila V. Yakushevich. Nonlinear Physics of DNA, 2nd Edition. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim (2004)

2004
[23]

and Loparo, J., A general approach to visualize protein binding and DNA conformation without protein labelling

Song, D., Graham, T. and Loparo, J., A general approach to visualize protein binding and DNA conformation without protein labelling. Nat. Commun. 7, 10976 (2016)

2016
[24]

Ijiro, K., and Mitomo, H., Metal nanoarchitecture fabrication using DNA as a biotemplate. Polym. J. 49 (12), 815–824 (2017)

2017
[25]

V., Li, J., Lin, C., Liu, L., et al

Dey, S., Fan, C., Gothelf, K. V., Li, J., Lin, C., Liu, L., et al. DNA origami. Nat. Rev. Methods Prim. 1 (1), 13 (2021)

2021
[26]

& Mirkin, C.A, Crystal engineering with DNA

Laramy, C.R., O’Brien, M.N. & Mirkin, C.A, Crystal engineering with DNA. Nat. Rev. Mater 4, 201–224 (2019)

2019
[27]

Madhvacharyula, Yancheng Du, Chengde Mao, and Jong Hyun Choi, Mechanical deformation behaviors and structural properties of ligated DNA crystals

Ruixin Li, Mengxi Zheng, Anirudh S. Madhvacharyula, Yancheng Du, Chengde Mao, and Jong Hyun Choi, Mechanical deformation behaviors and structural properties of ligated DNA crystals. Biophysical Journal 121, 4078–4090, November 1 (2022)

2022
[28]

Ohayon, James W

Brandon Lu, Simon Vecchioni, Yoel P. Ohayon, James W. Canary, and Ruojie Sha, The wending rhombus: Self-assembling 3D DNA crystals. Biophysical Journal 121 (20), 4759–4765 (2022)

2022
[29]

Exploring the Potential of Three-Dimensional DNA Crystals in Nanotechnology: Design, Optimization, and Applications

Huating Kong, Bo Sun, Feng Yu, Qisheng Wang , Kai Xia, Dawei Jiang . Exploring the Potential of Three-Dimensional DNA Crystals in Nanotechnology: Design, Optimization, and Applications. Adv Sci (Weinh). Aug; 10 (24):e2302021 (2023)

2023
[30]

P., Woloszyn, K., Markus, T., and Mao, C., Highly symmetric, self- assembling 3D DNA crystals with cubic and trigonal lattices

Lu, B., Simon, V., Ohayon, Y. P., Woloszyn, K., Markus, T., and Mao, C., Highly symmetric, self- assembling 3D DNA crystals with cubic and trigonal lattices. Small. 19, 3, 2205830 (2023). 15

2023
[31]

Takeno, Shigeo Homma, Topological solitons and modulated structure of bases in DNA double helices, Prog

S. Takeno, Shigeo Homma, Topological solitons and modulated structure of bases in DNA double helices, Prog. Theor. Phys. 70 (1), 308–311 (1983)

1983
[32]

Takeno, Shigeo Homma, Coupled base rotator model for structure and dy- namics of DNA, Prog

S. Takeno, Shigeo Homma, Coupled base rotator model for structure and dy- namics of DNA, Prog. Theor. Phys. 72 (4), 679–693 (1984)

1984
[33]

Daniel, V

M. Daniel, V. Vasumathi, Perturbed soliton excitations in the DNA double helix, Physica D, 231, 10-39 (2007)

2007
[34]

Daniel, V

M. Daniel, V. Vasumathi. Nonlinear molecular excitations in a completely inhomogeneous DNA chain. Physics Letters A 372, 5144–5151 (2008)

2008
[35]

Vasumathi, M

V. Vasumathi, M. Daniel, Base-pairs opening and bubble transport in a DNA double helix induced by a protein molecule in a viscous medium, Physical Review E 80, 061904 (2009)

2009
[36]

Daniel, M

M. Daniel, M. Vanitha, Bubble solitons in an inhomogeneous, helical DNA molecular chain with flexible strands, Phys. Rev. E 84, 031928 (2011)

2011
[37]

Sataric, and Muthiah Daniel, Kink solitons in DNA

Slobodan Zdravkovic Miljko V. Sataric, and Muthiah Daniel, Kink solitons in DNA. International Journal of Modern Physics B 27:31 (2013)

2013
[38]

Aguero, T.L

M.A. Aguero, T.L. Belyaeva, V.N. Serkin, Compacton anti-compacton pair for hydrogen bonds and rotational waves in DNA dynamics, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat. 16, 3071–3080 (2011)

2011
[39]

Pav´ on Torres, M

O. Pav´ on Torres, M. Aguero Granados, Exact traveling wave solutions in the coupled plane-base rotator model of DNA, International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics 86, 8–14 (2016)

2016
[40]

de Lourdes, Aguilar Jose A., Aguero Maximo A

Najera Ma. de Lourdes, Aguilar Jose A., Aguero Maximo A. DNA nonlinear dynamics with non- classical solitary waves. Bulletin of PFUR. Series Mathematics. Information Sciences, Physics 4, Pp. 144-152 (2012)

2012
[41]

Saha, T.C

M. Saha, T.C. Kofan´ e, DNA base pairs openings perturbed by the surrounding medium, Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simulat. 23, 1-9 (2015)

2015
[42]

Saha, T.C

M. Saha, T.C. Kofan´ e, Inhomogeneities and nonlinear dynamics of a helical DNA interacting with RNA-polymerase, Phys. Scr. 89, 085003 (2014)

2014
[43]

Saccomandi, I

G. Saccomandi, I. Sgura, The relevance of nonlinear stacking interactions in simple models of double- stranded DNA, J. R. Soc. Interface 3, 655-667 (2006)

2006
[44]

Triki, T

H. Triki, T. R. Taha, Solitary wave solutions for a higher order nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Math- ematics and Computers in Simulation 82, 1333–1340 (2012)

2012
[45]

E. M. E. Zayed, Y. A. Amer, Many exact solutions for a higher order nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with non-kerr terms describing the propagation of femtosecond optical pulses in nonlinear optical fibers, Computational Mathematics and Modeling, 28 (1), 118- 139 (2017)

2017
[46]

Solitonic rogue waves induced by the modulation instability in a split-ring-resonator-based left-handed coplanar waveg- uide

Souleymanou Abbagari, Alphonse Houwe, Lanre Akinyemi, Thomas Bouetou Bouetou. Solitonic rogue waves induced by the modulation instability in a split-ring-resonator-based left-handed coplanar waveg- uide. Chinese Journal of Physics 92, 2024. 1614-1627

2024
[47]

Souleymanou Abbagari, Alphonse Houwe, Lanre Akinyemi, Doka Yamingno Serge, Kofan´ e Timol´ eon Cr´ epin. Rogue and solitary waves of a system of coupled nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations in a left-handed transmission line with second-neighbors coupling, Physics Letters A, 520,...

2024
[48]

A. D. D. Craik: Wave Interactions and Fluid Flows (Cambridge University Press, London, 1984). 16

1984
[49]

O. E. Kurkina, A. A. Kurkin, T. Soomere, E. N. Pelinovsky, E. A. Rouvinskaya, Higher-order (2 + 4) Korteweg-de Vries-like equation for interfacial waves in a symmetric three-layer fluid, Phys. Fluids 23, 116602 (2011)

2011
[50]

A study of (2+1)- dimensional variable coefficients equation: Its oceanic solitons and localized wave solutions

Lanre Akinyemi, Solomon Manukure, Alphonse Houwe, Souleymanou Abbagari. A study of (2+1)- dimensional variable coefficients equation: Its oceanic solitons and localized wave solutions. Physics of Fluids 36, 013120 (2024). Physics of Fluids 1 January 2024; 36 (1): 013120

2024
[51]

Mukam, Souleymanou Abbagari, Alphonse Houwe, Victor K

Serge Paulin T. Mukam, Souleymanou Abbagari, Alphonse Houwe, Victor K. Kuetche, Serge Y. Doka, Thomas B. Bouetou, Mustafa Inc. On multiple soliton solutions of the extended (3+1)-dimensional Jimbo–Miwa equations. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science, 2022, 1-7

2022
[52]

Goullet, W

A. Goullet, W. Choi, A numerical and experimental study on the nonlinear evolution of long-crested irregular waves, Phys. Fluids 23, 016601 (2011)

2011
[53]

Gedalin, T

M. Gedalin, T. C. Scott, and Y. B. Band, Optical Solitary Waves in the Higher Order Nonlinear Schr¨ odinger Equation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 448 (1997)

1997
[54]

V. G. Kartavenko, Soliton-like solutions in nuclear hydrodynamics, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 40, 240-246 (1984)

1984
[55]

F. Kh. Abdullaev, A. Gammal, L. Tomio, T. Frederico, Stability of trapped Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A 63, 043604 (2001)

2001
[56]

Burger, K

S. Burger, K. Bongs, S. Dettmer, W. Ertmer, and K. Sengstock, Dark Solitons in Bose-Einstein Con- densates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 5198 (1999)

1999
[57]

Zhou and X

C. Zhou and X. T. He, Stochastic diffusion of electrons in evolutive Langmuir fields, Phys. Scr. 50, 415 (1993)

1993
[58]

Hacinliyan, S

I. Hacinliyan, S. Erbay, Coupled quintic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations in a generalized elastic solid, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37, 9387 (2004)

2004
[59]

Kumar, S

A. Kumar, S. N. Sarkar and A. K. Ghatak, Effect of fifth-order non-linearity in refractive index on Gaussian pulse propagation in lossy optical fibers, Opt. Lett. 11, 321-323, (1986)

1986
[60]

d´ ej` a vu

M.A. Ag¨ uero, T.L. Belyaeva, M. Perez-Maldonado, L. Morales-Lara, R. Pe˜ na-Moreno, V.N. Serkin. Nonlinear dynamics of “d´ ej` a vu” phenomenon in nonautonomous cubic–quintic NLSE models: Complete suppression of rogue waves generation, Optik, Volume 261, 2022, 169131

2022
[61]

R. Hao, L. Li, Z. Li, R. Yang, G. Zhou, A new way to exact quasi-soliton solutions and soliton interaction for the cubic-quintic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with variable coefficients, Opt. Commun. 245, 383–390 (2005)

2005
[62]

Yang, J.-F

Q. Yang, J.-F. Zhang, Optical quasi-soliton solutions for the cubic-quintic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equa- tion with variable coefficients, Int. J. Modern Phys. B 19, 4629–4636 (2005)

2005
[63]

Avelar, D

A.T. Avelar, D. Bazeia, W.B. Cardoso, Solitons with cubic and quintic nonlinearities modulated in space and time, Phys. Rev. E 79, 025602 (2009)

2009
[64]

Sarma, M

A.K. Sarma, M. Saha, A. Biswas, Optical solitons with power law nonlinearity and hamiltonian per- turbations: An exact solution, J. Infrared Millimeter and Terahertz Waves 31A, 1048–1056 (2010)

2010
[65]

C. Dai, Y. Wang, C. Yan, Chirped and chirp-free self-similar cnoidal and solitary wave solutions of the cubic-quintic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with distributed coefficients, Opt. Commun. 283, 1489–1494 (2010). 17

2010
[66]

Jiang, H.-Y

L.-H. Jiang, H.-Y. Wu, Spatiotemporal self-similar waves for the (3 + 1)-dimensional inhomogeneous cubic-quintic nonlinear medium, Opt. Commun. 284, 2022–2026 (2011)

2011
[67]

Dai, Y.-Y

C.-Q. Dai, Y.-Y. Wang, X.-G. Wang, Ultrashort self-similar solutions of the cubic-quintic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with distributed coefficients in the inhomogeneous fiber, J. Phys. A: Mathematical and Theoretical 44, 155203 (2011)

2011
[68]

Asghar Ali, Aly R. Seadawy, Dianchen Lu, Soliton solutions of the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with the dual power law nonlinearity and resonant nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation and their modulation instability analysis, Optik 145, 79–88 (2017)

2017
[69]

M. Inc, A. Yusuf, A.I. Aliyu, D. Baleanu, Optical soliton solutions for the higher-order dispersive cubic-quintic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Superlattice Microstructures112, 164–179 (2017)

2017
[70]

Aslan, F

E.C. Aslan, F. Tchier, M. Inc, On optical solitons of the Schr¨ odinger-Hirota equation with power law nonlinearity in optical fibers, Superlattice Microstructures 105, 48–55 (2017)

2017
[71]

Chen, Vortex and multipole coupled solitons in the spatially modulated cubic-quintic-septimal nonlinear material, Comput

Y.-X. Chen, Vortex and multipole coupled solitons in the spatially modulated cubic-quintic-septimal nonlinear material, Comput. Math. Appl. 76, 2119–2128 (2018)

2018
[72]

10, 150–154 (2018)

Chun-Yan Wang, The analytic solutions of Schr¨ odinger equation with cubic-quintic nonlinearities, Results Phys. 10, 150–154 (2018)

2018
[73]

J.-T. Li, Y. Zhu, J.-Z. Han, C.-Q. Dai, S.-H. Wang, Scalar and vector multipole and vortex solitons in the spatially modulated cubic-quintic nonlinear media, Nonlinear Dyn. 91, 757–765 (2018)

2018
[74]

Gholam-Ali Zakeri, Emmanuel Yomba, Solitons in multi-body interactions for a fully modulated cubic- quintic Gross-Pitaevskii equation, Appl. Math. Modelling 56, 1–14 (2018)

2018
[75]

Debraj Nath, Barnana Roy, Rajkumar Roychoudhury, Periodic waves and their stability in competing cubic-quintic nonlinearity, Opt. Commun. 393, 224–231 (2017)

2017
[76]

Dai, Y.-Y

C.-Q. Dai, Y.-Y. Wang, Y. Fan, D.-G. Yu, Reconstruction of stability for Gaussian spatial solitons in quintic-septimal nonlinear materials under PT-symmetric potentials, Nonlinear Dyn. 92, 1351–1358 (2018)

2018
[77]

Sharafali, K

A. Sharafali, K. Nithyanandan, K. Porsezian, Self-similar pulse compression by defective core photonic crystal fiber with cubic-quintic nonlinearities, Optik 178, 591–601 (2019)

2019
[78]

Sultan, Alamri, R

Z. Sultan, Alamri, R. Aly, Seadawy, M. Haya, Al-Sharari, Study of optical soliton fibers with power law model by means of higher-order nonlinear Schr¨ odinger dynamical system, Results Phys. 13, 102251 (2019)

2019
[79]

Pav´ on-Torres, M

O. Pav´ on-Torres, M. A. Ag¨ uero, T.L. Belyaeva, A. Ramirez, V. N. Serkin, Unusual self-spreading or self-compression of the cubic-quintic NLSE solitons owing to amplification or absorption, Optik 184, 446-456 (2019)

2019
[80]

Pav´ on-Torres, M

O. Pav´ on-Torres, M. A. Ag¨ uero-Granados, and R. Valencia-Torres. Adiabatic evolution of solitons embedded in lipid membranes. Phys. Scr. 99 125256 (2024)

2024
[81]

Perelomov, Generalized coherent states and some of their applications, Sov

A.M. Perelomov, Generalized coherent states and some of their applications, Sov. Phys. Usp. 20 (9) 703 (1977)

1977
[82]

Perelomov, Generalized Coherent States and Their Applications, Springer, Verlag Berlin and Heidelberg GmbH and C

A.M. Perelomov, Generalized Coherent States and Their Applications, Springer, Verlag Berlin and Heidelberg GmbH and C. K, 2010. 18

2010
[83]

Pavon Torres, M

O. Pavon Torres, M. Davila Davila, M. A. Aguero Granados, Introduction to coherent states approach for solving non-linear physical problems, Applied Physics Research, 8 (1), 106-124 (2016)

2016
[84]

Kudryashov

Nikolay A. Kudryashov. Bright and dark solitons in a nonlinear saturable medium. Physics Letters A 427, 127913 (2022)

2022
[85]

Modulational instability in nonlinear saturable media with competing nonlocal nonlinearity

Conrad Bertrand Tabi, Hippolyte Tagwo, and Timol´ eon Cr´ epin Kofan´ e. Modulational instability in nonlinear saturable media with competing nonlocal nonlinearity. Phys. Rev. E 106, 054201 (2022)

2022
[86]

V., The impact of viscosity on the DNA dynamics

Zhravkovi´ c S., Satari´ c M. V., The impact of viscosity on the DNA dynamics. Physica Scripta, Phys. Scr. 64, 612 (2001)

2001
[87]

Kodoma, M

Y. Kodoma, M. J. Ablowitz, Perturbations of solitons and solitary waves, Studies in applied mathe- matics 64, 225-245 (1981)

1981
[88]

Serkin, Tatyana L

Vladimir N. Serkin, Tatyana L. Belyaeva, Igor V. Alexandrov, Gaston Melo Melchor, Novel topological quasi-soliton solutions for the nonlinear cubic-quintic Schr¨ odinger equation, Proc. SPIE 4271, Optical Pulse and Beam Propagation III, 292-302 (2001)

2001
[89]

Biswas, Quasi-stationary optical solitons with parabolic law nonlinearity, Optics Communications 216, 427-437 (2003)

A. Biswas, Quasi-stationary optical solitons with parabolic law nonlinearity, Optics Communications 216, 427-437 (2003)

2003
[90]

Alberts, A

B. Alberts, A. Johnson, J. Lewis, M. Raff, K. Roberts, and P. Walter, Molecular biology of the cell, 6th edition (2014). 19

2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

The impact of the sequence-dependent physical properties of DNA on chromatin dynamics

Aditi Biswas, Aakash Basu. The impact of the sequence-dependent physical properties of DNA on chromatin dynamics. Current Opinion in Structural Biology 2023, 83:102698

2023

[2] [2]

Nonlinearity 17, R1–R40 (2004)

Michel Peyrard, Nonlinear dynamics and statistical physics of DNA. Nonlinearity 17, R1–R40 (2004)

2004

[3] [3]

Bianca, M

C. Bianca, M. Delitala, On the modelling of genetic mutations and immune system competition. Com- puters and Mathematics with Applications 61, 2362-2375 (2011)

2011

[4] [4]

PLoS Genet 14 (11), e1007823 (2018)

Brown AJ, Mao P, Smerdon MJ, Wyrick JJ, Roberts SA, Nucleosome positions establish an extended mutation signature in melanoma. PLoS Genet 14 (11), e1007823 (2018)

2018

[5] [5]

Cell 175, 1074–1087 (2018)

Pich et al., Somatic and Germline Mutation Periodicity Follow the Orientation of the DNA Minor Groove around Nucleosomes. Cell 175, 1074–1087 (2018)

2018

[6] [6]

Wyrick, Mutperiod: Analysis of periodic mutation rates in nu- cleosomes

Benjamin Morledge-Hampton, John J. Wyrick, Mutperiod: Analysis of periodic mutation rates in nu- cleosomes. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal 19, 4177-4183 (2021)

2021

[7] [7]

Amar Singh and Navin Singh, Pulling short DNA molecules having defects on different locations. Phys. Rev. E 92, 032703 (2015)

2015

[8] [8]

et al, The central role of DNA damage in the ageing process

Schumacher, B., Pothof, J., Vijg, J. et al, The central role of DNA damage in the ageing process. Nature 592, 695–703 (2021)

2021