Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 52 references

Learning Spatially Decoupled Color Representations for Facial Image Colorization

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper establishes that separating color into per-component codes for lips, skin, eyes, and hair makes facial image colorization more natural and controllable, and that one network then covers no-reference, single-reference, and…

desk verdict A genuinely clever decoupling trick and strong automatic colorization results, but the paper's headline claim spans three modes and only one is quantified. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.07203 v1 pith:GFZEU35D submitted 2024-12-10 cs.CV

Hangyan Zhu , Ming Liu , Chao Zhou , Zifei Yan , Kuanquan Wang , Wangmeng Zuo This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords facialimagecolorizationfaceparsingdecoupledcolorrepresentationreference-basedautomaticnormalizingflowspatialandchromaticaugmentationcomponent-wisecontrol
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that existing image colorizers produce unnatural, uneven results on faces because they lack an understanding of facial components. It proposes FCNet, which uses a face parsing model to learn a decoupled color representation for each major face region, so the color of the lips cannot contaminate the skin or eyes. A training strategy that augments each color image chromatically and spatially, then assembles a composite ground truth from different augmented versions, forces each part of the representation to control exactly one component. After training, the same pipeline colorizes from a single reference image, mixes colors from several references, or runs without any reference by predicting codes from the grayscale input or sampling them from a learned distribution. The paper reports lower FID and higher PSNR/SSIM than prior methods on an aligned face test set, with more controllable and visually natural results.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the decoupled component color representation w, a low-dimensional latent code with one slot per facial component (lips, skin, eyes, hair, background) plus the training objective that keeps the slots independent. A pre-trained face parser provides the masks that define the components; chromatic and spatial augmentation creates a composite supervision signal in which each component of the target color comes from a different augmented copy of the same image, so the encoder is rewarded only when each code slot controls its own region. The colorization network f expands w through a grouped decoder and uses an affine transform (multiplication and addition) to inject color into grayscale features.

What would settle it

Colorize a fixed grayscale face twice using the same reference except with the lips slot of w taken from a different reference photo (e.g., red vs brown lipstick on the same face layout). If pixels outside the lip mask change between the two results, the representation is not spatially decoupled and the paper's central mechanism is falsified. A second decisive observation: run the face parser on grayscale versions of images and compare its component masks with the masks on the original color images; a systematic drop in lip/eye boundary agreement on grayscale input would predict exactly where the automatic mode fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the unnatural color bleeding in face colorization comes from entangled color information across facial components, and that this entanglement can be broken by structured supervision. FCNet extracts a grouped color code w = [w_lips, w_skin, w_eyes, w_hair, w_background] from reference images; during training the ground truth image is assembled from five differently augmented versions so that each w_i is the only source of color for its own component. Because the encoder is shared across augmented versions, it cannot fall back on spatial shortcuts and must learn which code entries map to which facial regions. The same w then feeds a colorization network whose decoder uses grouped convolutions and affine modulation, giving component-level control in single- and multi-reference modes and enabling two no-reference modes via an encoder that predicts w and a normalizing flow that samples it.

Load-bearing premise

The entire pipeline assumes that the pre-trained face parser—the model that labels which pixels are lips, skin, eyes, and hair—works reliably on both color and grayscale faces; if it mislabels those regions, the decoupled color codes land on the wrong pixels and the quality collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A user can recolor only the lips, only the skin, or only the eyes of a grayscale face by editing or replacing the corresponding slot in w, without retraining.
  • The same trained colorization network serves single-reference, multi-reference, and no-reference modes, so a face colorizer can be deployed without collecting reference images.
  • Automatic mode requires only the grayscale photo plus the parser's masks, making black-and-white photo restoration a one-pass procedure.
  • Color diversity becomes a sampling operation on a learned distribution, so multiple plausible colorizations of the same face are produced at inference time.
  • Because the color representation branch is the only module that changes between modes, the paper's architecture lets the branch be replaced with a better encoder or flow without retraining the colorization network.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: the same decoupling recipe—parse into parts, assign each part a latent color slot, supervise with cross-augmented composites—should transfer to other objects with stable component colors, such as clothing, cars, or animals, where color bleeding is also a visible artifact.
  • Editorial extension: the automatic mode's ceiling is set by the face parser's accuracy on grayscale, unaligned, or occluded faces; the paper does not report parsing metrics there, so the practical gain over prior methods is likely to shrink on such inputs.
  • Editorial extension: the per-component codes look like editable palettes, so one could build a 'lipstick preview' tool that fixes the skin and hair slots and only varies the lips slot, which the paper demonstrates qualitatively but does not develop into an interface.
  • Editorial extension: a direct test of decoupling would be to swap the lips slot of w between two identities and verify visually and in pixel terms that only the lips change; reporting such an experiment would make the controllability claim quantitative.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes FCNet, a facial image colorization framework that learns a spatially decoupled color representation for each facial component (lips, skin, eyes, hair, background) under the guidance of face parsing maps. A chromatic and spatial augmentation strategy is introduced to enforce decoupling using only grayscale/color pairs. The trained model is extended to no-reference scenarios by training an automatic encoder g_auto and a normalizing-flow-based diverse colorization module g_flow. Experiments on CelebA-HQ report quantitative results for automatic colorization against ten baselines (Table 1), qualitative comparisons for single-/multi-reference colorization (Fig. 5), and an ablation study (Table 2). The abstract claims favorable performance in no-, single-, and multi-reference scenarios, but quantitative support is provided only for the automatic mode.

Significance. If substantiated, the paper would offer a practical face colorization system with per-component color control and multiple application modes. The automatic colorization experiments are a strength: they use official baseline implementations, a held-out test set, and a common set of metrics. The proposed augmentation-based decoupling is a plausible and interesting mechanism. However, the central claim of 'favorably against existing methods in various application scenarios' is not quantitatively demonstrated for single-reference, multi-reference, or diverse colorization, and the face parser—on which the whole pipeline depends—is not specified or evaluated. The paper also lacks error bars or significance tests, and the promised code and pre-trained models are not yet available, limiting independent verification. The core idea is defensible, but the evidence is uneven.

major comments (5)
  1. [Comparison with Previous Methods; Fig. 5] Table 1 reports FID/CF/PSNR/SSIM only for the automatic colorization mode. The single- and multi-reference modes, which are core to the title and to the abstract's claim of favorable performance 'in various application scenarios', are compared only via qualitative figures (Fig. 5 and supplementary). No quantitative comparison against WCT2, Gray2ColorNet, TFColor, Unicolor, or PDNLA-Net is given. Since these baselines are central to the claimed contribution, the paper must add quantitative results (e.g., FID, CF, and component-wise color accuracy) for reference-guided colorization before the central claim can be accepted.
  2. [Facial Component Priors; Automatic Colorization] The entire decoupling and the automatic module rely on a face parser P, used as m_ref = P(x_ref) for references and m_l for grayscale inputs. The paper never names the parser, reports its architecture, or evaluates its accuracy on grayscale inputs and on the aligned faces used in the experiments. If the parser mislabels components (especially on grayscale or less-aligned faces), the color representations w and the predicted w from g_auto are wrong by construction. Please specify the parser and provide a quantitative analysis of parsing quality on both color and grayscale inputs, or at least show representative parsing maps and failure cases.
  3. [Experimental Setting] Table 1 reports a single run for each method without error bars, confidence intervals, or significance tests. For example, the FID gap between Ours (3.60) and DDColor (3.80) is small and could be within run-to-run variation, especially since GAN-based methods are sensitive to seed and initialization. Please report results over multiple seeds (at least three) with mean and standard deviation, or provide a statistical significance test, so the reader can judge whether the reported improvements are meaningful.
  4. [Ablation Study; Table 2] The ablation study measures only global metrics (FID, CF, PSNR, SSIM) and does not include any metric that quantifies per-component color control or decoupling strength. The paper's key claim is that the representation is 'spatially decoupled' and enables independent control of each facial component, yet this is supported only by qualitative examples. Please add a quantitative evaluation of controllability, for example by measuring component-wise color transfer accuracy (e.g., color error on each parsing region when a reference is swapped) or by reporting a user study on controllability.
  5. [Diverse Colorization; Extension to No-reference Scenarios] The diverse colorization mode is introduced as one of the three application paradigms, but it has no quantitative evaluation: no diversity metric (e.g., LPIPS distance, color histogram variance), no comparison to other diverse colorization methods, and no measure of whether the sampled colors match the learned distribution. Also, the training details and loss functions for g_flow and g_auto are deferred entirely to the supplementary material. Please include a quantitative diversity evaluation and state the full training objective in the main text or clearly reference a specific section of the supplementary that provides it.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Contact information] The email address 'csmliu@oulook.com' appears to contain a typo; it should likely be 'outlook.com'.
  2. [Notation in Method] The notation is inconsistent: the grayscale input is x_l with one channel, the reference is x_ab with two channels in one place, but later x_ref and m_ref are used. Please define all symbols consistently in one place, especially since the face parser P presumably operates on an RGB or Lab image, while the reference is described as containing only the ab channels.
  3. [Table 2] The presentation of Table 2 is confusing: the checkmarks and row labels are not aligned in the text, making it difficult to determine which configuration each row corresponds to. For example, the row labeled 'w/o Data Augmentaion' shows two checkmarks, which appears to contradict its label. Please reformat the table so each row's configuration is unambiguous.
  4. [Related Work and References] Some references are introduced by nickname (e.g., 'Colorful', 'InstColor', 'DisColor') without giving the paper title at first mention; please provide full citations in Table 1 to help readers identify the exact works.
  5. [Qualitative claims] In the qualitative evaluation of Fig. 4, the statement that 'our results demonstrate the minimal degree of color bleeding' is subjective; please support such claims with a quantitative metric (e.g., edge color-bleeding measure or component-wise color consistency) or temper the phrasing.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: FCNet is a standard supervised training pipeline evaluated against external baselines; the unsupported single- and multi-reference claims are an evidentiary gap, not a circular derivation.

full rationale

The paper's central mechanism trains a color representation branch and a colorization network with reconstruction, perceptual, cycle-consistency, and adversarial losses on grayscale/color pairs from FFHQ, and evaluates on held-out CelebA-HQ against independently published baselines using their official code. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing result is defined in terms of the claim it is supposed to support. The decoupled color representation is enforced by a carefully constructed training objective in which augmented images supply individual facial components of a composite ground truth; this is a training constraint that the network must satisfy, not a tautology that guarantees the reported quantitative improvements. The ablations in Table 2 compare variants on the full test set, providing independent evidence for the contributions of the augmentation and grouped design. The automatic colorization module is trained to predict a color representation extracted by the already-trained branch, which is a standard teacher-student style setup rather than a circular validation. The only self-citation (ControlVideo, sharing an author) appears in a list of prior diffusion-based colorization works and is not load-bearing. The most serious weakness is that single- and multi-reference colorization and diverse colorization are supported only by qualitative figures, so the abstract's claim of favorable performance in 'various application scenarios' is under-evidenced; however, that is a missing experiment, not a circular argument.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on an unnamed face parser, the assumption that each component's color fits in a low-dimensional code, the claim that augmentation forces disentanglement, and Lab-space decomposition. These are plausible but not independently verified; all evidence is internal to the paper's own experiments.

free parameters (4)
  • Color code dimensionality per component
    The dimension of the per-component color representation w is not specified in the main text; it controls capacity and is chosen without reported sensitivity analysis.
  • Loss weights alpha, beta, gamma = 1.0, 0.05, 1.0
    The total loss in Eq. (1) is L = Ladv + alpha*L1 + beta*Lperc + gamma*Lcyc; the weights are set empirically with no ablation reported.
  • Chromatic and spatial augmentation ranges
    The paper mentions color jittering, affine transformations, and flipping but does not give the ranges or probabilities; the claimed disentanglement depends on these choices.
  • Training schedule = LR 5e-5/1e-3, batch 4/16, 50 epochs
    Implementation details report learning rates, batch sizes, and epoch count for the main pipeline and the submodules; no sensitivity analysis is provided.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Face parser P produces accurate component masks for both color and grayscale inputs.
    Used to build m_ref and m_l; if parsing fails on grayscale images, the component codes become misaligned and the colorization result degrades.
  • domain assumption Each facial component's color can be represented by a single low-dimensional latent code w_c.
    Stated in the Method section as the color consistency assumption; it ignores within-component spatial color gradients such as skin shading or hair highlights.
  • ad hoc to paper Chromatic plus spatial augmentation enforces component-wise disentanglement without explicit per-component reconstruction losses.
    The paper claims the composite-image supervision restricts each w_i to one facial component, but this is an architectural and training-strategy assumption without an independent diagnostic of disentanglement.
  • domain assumption CIE-Lab ab channels suffice to encode facial component color, with the grayscale input supplying the L channel.
    Inputs and outputs are formulated in Lab space; any luminance-color entanglement would break the claimed color decomposition.
  • standard math Normalizing flow density estimation can model the distribution of component color codes w.
    Used in the diverse colorization mode to sample w; standard method, so no proof is needed, but its adequacy for this latent space is not demonstrated.
invented entities (1)
  • Component-decoupled color representation w
    purpose: A latent code per facial component that guides the colorization network and enables per-component color control.
    This is an internal latent representation introduced by the paper; its validity is assessed only through downstream image quality in this paper, not through an independent measurement or a falsifiable external prediction.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Learning Spatially Decoupled Color Representations for Facial Image Colorization." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GFZEU35D

@misc{pith2026241207203,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Learning Spatially Decoupled Color Representations for Facial Image Colorization},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GFZEU35D}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.07203}
}
read the original abstract

Image colorization methods have shown prominent performance on natural images. However, since humans are more sensitive to faces, existing methods are insufficient to meet the demands when applied to facial images, typically showing unnatural and uneven colorization results. In this paper, we investigate the facial image colorization task and find that the problems with facial images can be attributed to an insufficient understanding of facial components. As a remedy, by introducing facial component priors, we present a novel facial image colorization framework dubbed FCNet. Specifically, we learn a decoupled color representation for each face component (e.g., lips, skin, eyes, and hair) under the guidance of face parsing maps. A chromatic and spatial augmentation strategy is presented to facilitate the learning procedure, which requires only grayscale and color facial image pairs. After training, the presented FCNet can be naturally applied to facial image colorization with single or multiple reference images. To expand the application paradigms to scenarios with no reference images, we further train two alternative modules, which predict the color representations from the grayscale input or a random seed, respectively. Extensive experiments show that our method can perform favorably against existing methods in various application scenarios (i.e., no-, single-, and multi-reference facial image colorization). The source code and pre-trained models will be publicly available.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.07203 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Our method encompasses three colorization approaches, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overview and main training phase of our method. As depicted in the figure, the red arrows represent the data aug [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Two application paradigms for No-reference scenarios. (a) denotes the Diverse Colorization, wherein the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The qualitative results of our method and automatic colorization baseline methods. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The qualitative results of our method and reference image-based colorization baseline methods. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.a...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in capitalize " " * FUNCT...

  3. [3]

    K.; Wu, Z.; Ma, X.; and Choo, J

    Bahng, H.; Yoo, S.; Cho, W.; Park, D. K.; Wu, Z.; Ma, X.; and Choo, J. 2018. Coloring with words: Guiding image colorization through text-based palette generation. In Proceedings of the european conference on computer vision (eccv), 431--447

    2018

  4. [4]

    Chang, H.; Fried, O.; Liu, Y.; DiVerdi, S.; and Finkelstein, A. 2015. Palette-based photo recoloring. ACM Trans. Graph., 34(4): 139--1

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    Charpiat, G.; Hofmann, M.; and Sch \"o lkopf, B. 2008. Automatic image colorization via multimodal predictions. In Computer Vision--ECCV 2008: 10th European Conference on Computer Vision, Marseille, France, October 12-18, 2008, Proceedings, Part III 10, 126--139. Springer

    work page 2008

  6. [6]

    Cheng, Z.; Yang, Q.; and Sheng, B. 2015. Deep colorization. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, 415--423

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    Y.-S.; Zhuo, S.; Gupta, R

    Chia, A. Y.-S.; Zhuo, S.; Gupta, R. K.; Tai, Y.-W.; Cho, S.-Y.; Tan, P.; and Lin, S. 2011. Semantic colorization with internet images. ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG), 30(6): 1--8

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    Deshpande, A.; Lu, J.; Yeh, M.-C.; Jin Chong, M.; and Forsyth, D. 2017. Learning diverse image colorization. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 6837--6845

    work page 2017

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    Dinh, L.; Krueger, D.; and Bengio, Y. 2014. Nice: Non-linear independent components estimation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1410.8516

    2014 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Dinh, L.; Sohl-Dickstein, J.; and Bengio, S. 2016. Density estimation using real nvp. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.08803

    2016 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Dosovitskiy, A.; Beyer, L.; Kolesnikov, A.; Weissenborn, D.; Zhai, X.; Unterthiner, T.; Dehghani, M.; Minderer, M.; Heigold, G.; Gelly, S.; et al. 2020. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929

    2020 arXiv

  4. [12]

    K.; Chia, A

    Gupta, R. K.; Chia, A. Y.-S.; Rajan, D.; Ng, E. S.; and Zhiyong, H. 2012. Image colorization using similar images. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Multimedia, 369--378

    2012

  5. [13]

    V.; and Yuan, L

    He, M.; Chen, D.; Liao, J.; Sander, P. V.; and Yuan, L. 2018. Deep exemplar-based colorization. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 37(4): 1--16

    2018

  6. [14]

    Heusel, M.; Ramsauer, H.; Unterthiner, T.; Nessler, B.; and Hochreiter, S. 2017. Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30

    2017

  7. [15]

    Huang, Z.; Zhao, N.; and Liao, J. 2022. UniColor: A Unified Framework for Multi-Modal Colorization with Transformer. ACM Trans. Graph., 41(6)

    2022

  8. [16]

    Huynh-Thu, Q.; and Ghanbari, M. 2008. Scope of validity of PSNR in image/video quality assessment. Electronics letters, 44(13): 800--801

    2008

  9. [17]

    Iizuka, S.; and Simo-Serra, E. 2019. Deepremaster: temporal source-reference attention networks for comprehensive video enhancement. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 38(6): 1--13

    2019

  10. [18]

    Ironi, R.; Cohen-Or, D.; and Lischinski, D. 2005. Colorization by Example. Rendering techniques, 29: 201--210

    2005

  11. [19]

    Ji, X.; Jiang, B.; Luo, D.; Tao, G.; Chu, W.; Xie, Z.; Wang, C.; and Tai, Y. 2022. ColorFormer: Image colorization via color memory assisted hybrid-attention transformer. In European Conference on Computer Vision, 20--36. Springer

    2022

  12. [20]

    Johnson, J.; Alahi, A.; and Fei-Fei, L. 2016. Perceptual losses for real-time style transfer and super-resolution. In Computer Vision--ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 11-14, 2016, Proceedings, Part II 14, 694--711. Springer

    2016

  13. [21]

    Kang, X.; Yang, T.; Ouyang, W.; Ren, P.; Li, L.; and Xie, X. 2023. Ddcolor: Towards photo-realistic image colorization via dual decoders. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 328--338

    2023

  14. [22]

    Karras, T.; Aila, T.; Laine, S.; and Lehtinen, J. 2017. Progressive growing of gans for improved quality, stability, and variation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.10196

    2017 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Karras, T.; Laine, S.; and Aila, T. 2019. A style-based generator architecture for generative adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 4401--4410

    2019

  16. [24]

    Ke, Z.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, L.; Zhao, N.; and Lau, R. W. 2023. Neural preset for color style transfer. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 14173--14182

    2023

  17. [25]

    Kim, G.; Kang, K.; Kim, S.; Lee, H.; Kim, S.; Kim, J.; Baek, S.-H.; and Cho, S. 2022. BigColor: Colorization using a generative color prior for natural images. In European Conference on Computer Vision, 350--366. Springer

    2022

  18. [26]

    P.; and Ba, J

    Kingma, D. P.; and Ba, J. 2014. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980

    2014 arXiv

  19. [27]

    P.; and Dhariwal, P

    Kingma, D. P.; and Dhariwal, P. 2018. Glow: Generative flow with invertible 1x1 convolutions. Advances in neural information processing systems, 31

    2018

  20. [28]

    Kumar, M.; Weissenborn, D.; and Kalchbrenner, N. 2021. Colorization transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.04432

    2021 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Levin, A.; Lischinski, D.; and Weiss, Y. 2004. Colorization using optimization. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2004 Papers, 689--694

    2004

  22. [30]

    Liang, Z.; Li, Z.; Zhou, S.; Li, C.; and Loy, C. C. 2024. Control Color: Multimodal Diffusion-based Interactive Image Colorization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.10855

    2024 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Liu, X.; Wan, L.; Qu, Y.; Wong, T.-T.; Lin, S.; Leung, C.-S.; and Heng, P.-A. 2008. Intrinsic colorization. In ACM SIGGRAPH Asia 2008 papers, 1--9

    2008

  24. [32]

    Lu, P.; Yu, J.; Peng, X.; Zhao, Z.; and Wang, X. 2020. Gray2colornet: Transfer more colors from reference image. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM international conference on multimedia, 3210--3218

    2020

  25. [33]

    Qu, Y.; Wong, T.-T.; and Heng, P.-A. 2006. Manga colorization. ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG), 25(3): 1214--1220

    2006

  26. [34]

    Su, J.-W.; Chu, H.-K.; and Huang, J.-B. 2020. Instance-aware image colorization. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 7968--7977

    2020

  27. [35]

    A.; Casadio, F.; Andral, J.-L.; and Katsaggelos, A

    Tsaftaris, S. A.; Casadio, F.; Andral, J.-L.; and Katsaggelos, A. K. 2014. A novel visualization tool for art history and conservation: Automated colorization of black and white archival photographs of works of art. Studies in conservation, 59(3): 125--135

    2014

  28. [36]

    Vitoria, P.; Raad, L.; and Ballester, C. 2020. Chromagan: Adversarial picture colorization with semantic class distribution. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF winter conference on applications of computer vision, 2445--2454

    2020

  29. [37]

    Wang, H.; Zhai, D.; Liu, X.; Jiang, J.; and Gao, W. 2023. Unsupervised deep exemplar colorization via pyramid dual non-local attention. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing

    2023

  30. [38]

    C.; Sheikh, H

    Wang, Z.; Bovik, A. C.; Sheikh, H. R.; and Simoncelli, E. P. 2004. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE transactions on image processing, 13(4): 600--612

    2004

  31. [39]

    Weng, S.; Sun, J.; Li, Y.; Li, S.; and Shi, B. 2022. CT 2: Colorization transformer via color tokens. In European Conference on Computer Vision, 1--16. Springer

    2022

  32. [40]

    Weng, S.; Zhang, P.; Li, Y.; Li, S.; Shi, B.; et al. 2024. L-cad: Language-based colorization with any-level descriptions using diffusion priors. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36

    2024

  33. [41]

    Wu, Y.; Wang, X.; Li, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, X.; and Shan, Y. 2021. Towards vivid and diverse image colorization with generative color prior. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 14377--14386

    2021

  34. [42]

    Xia, M.; Hu, W.; Wong, T.-T.; and Wang, J. 2022. Disentangled image colorization via global anchors. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 41(6): 1--13

    2022

  35. [43]

    Xu, Z.; Wang, T.; Fang, F.; Sheng, Y.; and Zhang, G. 2020. Stylization-based architecture for fast deep exemplar colorization. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 9363--9372

    2020

  36. [44]

    Attention Is All You Need

    Yin, W.; Lu, P.; Zhao, Z.; and Peng, X. 2021. Yes," Attention Is All You Need", for Exemplar based Colorization. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM international conference on multimedia, 2243--2251

    2021

  37. [45]

    Yoo, J.; Uh, Y.; Chun, S.; Kang, B.; and Ha, J.-W. 2019. Photorealistic style transfer via wavelet transforms. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 9036--9045

    2019

  38. [46]

    Yun, J.; Lee, S.; Park, M.; and Choo, J. 2023. iColoriT: Towards propagating local hints to the right region in interactive colorization by leveraging vision transformer. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, 1787--1796

    2023

  39. [47]

    Zhang, R.; Isola, P.; and Efros, A. A. 2016. Colorful image colorization. In Computer Vision--ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 11-14, 2016, Proceedings, Part III 14, 649--666. Springer

    2016

  40. [48]

    S.; Yu, T.; and Efros, A

    Zhang, R.; Zhu, J.-Y.; Isola, P.; Geng, X.; Lin, A. S.; Yu, T.; and Efros, A. A. 2017. Real-time user-guided image colorization with learned deep priors. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.02999

    2017 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Zhang, Y.; Wei, Y.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, X.; Zuo, W.; and Tian, Q. 2023. Controlvideo: Training-free controllable text-to-video generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.13077

    2023 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Zhao, J.; Han, J.; Shao, L.; and Snoek, C. G. 2020. Pixelated semantic colorization. International Journal of Computer Vision, 128: 818--834

    2020

  43. [51]

    G.; Han, J.; and Shao, L

    Zhao, J.; Liu, L.; Snoek, C. G.; Han, J.; and Shao, L. 2018. Pixel-level semantics guided image colorization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.01597

    2018 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Zhu, J.-Y.; Park, T.; Isola, P.; and Efros, A. A. 2017. Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, 2223--2232

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.