Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Neural Scaling Laws Rooted in the Data Distribution

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.07942 v1 pith:G325O3YS submitted 2024-12-10 cs.LG cond-mat.dis-nn

classification cs.LGcond-mat.dis-nn
keywords scalingneurallawsdatadatasetsmodeltheorynatural
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep neural networks exhibit empirical neural scaling laws, with error decreasing as a power law with increasing model or data size, across a wide variety of architectures, tasks, and datasets. This universality suggests that scaling laws may result from general properties of natural learning tasks. We develop a mathematical model intended to describe natural datasets using percolation theory. Two distinct criticality regimes emerge, each yielding optimal power-law neural scaling laws. These regimes, corresponding to power-law-distributed discrete subtasks and a dominant data manifold, can be associated with previously proposed theories of neural scaling, thereby grounding and unifying prior works. We test the theory by training regression models on toy datasets derived from percolation theory simulations. We suggest directions for quantitatively predicting language model scaling.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Smooth Scaling Laws Hide Stepwise Token Learning

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Token loss trajectories follow localized sigmoids whose learning-time spectrum quantitatively reconstructs scaling-law derivatives on T, D, and M axes and enables faster training via distribution reshaping.

  2. X-Factor: Quality Is a Dataset-Intrinsic Property

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Across 2,500 class-balanced MNIST subsets and 10 model architectures, test-error Z-scores correlate strongly across models (mean R2=0.82 excluding GNB), supporting dataset quality as an intrinsic property.

Pith tools