Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 120 references

A mechanical quantum memory for microwave photons

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A transmon qubit couples strongly to a single-crystal silicon nanomechanical oscillator with an intrinsic $25$ ms single-phonon lifetime, enabling deterministic preparation of non-classical states and millisecond-scale coherence under…

desk verdict Strong experimental paper: electrostatic coupling to an ultra-high-Q silicon mechanical oscillator with demonstrated quantum control; the 25 ms headline T1 is model-corrected but the directly measured ~20 ms decays and all qualitative claims are solid. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.08006 v1 pith:H67GV5NQ submitted 2024-12-11 quant-ph

Alk{i}m B. Bozkurt , Omid Golami , Yue Yu , Hao Tian , Mohammad Mirhosseini This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords quantumacoustodynamicselectromechanicalcouplingphononiccrystalresonatortwo-level-systemdefectsmechanicalmemorydynamicaldecouplingWignertomographyphononFockstate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a microwave-frequency quantum state can be stored in a purely mechanical resonator with an energy lifetime of roughly 25 ms, while a superconducting qubit supplies the deterministic handle needed to write, protect, and read the state. The authors couple a transmon qubit to a single-crystal silicon nanobeam through a voltage-biased vacuum-gap capacitor, reaching strong coupling at $g_{\rm em}/2\pi \approx 200$\textendash$230$ kHz with large cooperativities ($C_{T_1}\approx 1.5\times10^5$, $C_{T_2}\approx 150$). Using the qubit as actuator and probe, they prepare a single-phonon Fock state with a Wigner function that goes negative, measure a $25 \pm 2$ ms intrinsic mechanical lifetime at the single-phonon level, and trace the dominant dephasing to individual two-level-system defects. Echo sequences run through the qubit lift the coherence time to $T_2^{\rm CP2} = 1.02 \pm 0.15$ ms. If these numbers hold, mechanical oscillators become compact bosonic memories that outlive superconducting qubits and planar microwave resonators by more than an order of magnitude.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing element is a phononic-crystal nanobeam resonator machined from single-crystal silicon, whose 'breathing' motion modulates a vacuum-gap capacitor attached to the transmon; the electrostatic interaction appears as a Jaynes\textendash Cummings coupling $g_{\rm em} = g_0 V_{\rm dc}$ that scales linearly with bias voltage, so the qubit both controls and probes the phonon field. Phononic shields with a band gap exceeding $2$ GHz suppress clamping loss and keep mechanical energy away from lossy metal electrodes, while an on-chip notch filter stops the qubit from radiating into the DC bias line. The quantitative instrument behind the headline lifetime is the inverse-Purcell relation $\Gamma = \Gamma_i + (g_{\rm em}/\Delta)^2\kappa$ (Appendix H1), which converts raw measured decays of $19$\textendash$21$ ms into the intrinsic $25 \pm 2$ ms by subtracting the qubit-mediated decay channel. Around this core sits the dephasing model, an ensemble of thermal fluctuators producing telegrapher frequency noise with $P(\nu,\gamma)\propto 1/(\gamma\nu^2)$, which accounts for the exponential Ramsey and echo decays and for the observed echo efficiency of roughly six.

What would settle it

Measure the single-phonon mechanical decay rate as a function of qubit\textendash mechanics detuning $\Delta$ and test the fit against $\Gamma = \Gamma_i + (g_{\rm em}/\Delta)^2\kappa$ in the regime where the subtraction term is large; a deviation from the $(g_{\rm em}/\Delta)^2$ scaling, or an extrapolated $\Delta \to \infty$ intercept that disagrees with a direct waveguide-based single-phonon measurement, would undercut the intrinsic $25$ ms claim. A device whose qubit can be detuned so far that the subtraction term is negligible should show a single-phonon lifetime near $25$ ms on its own.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors' claim is that electrostatic coupling, rather than piezoelectric transduction, can join a transmon qubit to an all-silicon phononic-crystal resonator without sacrificing the crystal's ultra-low acoustic loss. The device realizes the Jaynes\textendash Cummings interaction $\hat{H}/\hbar = (\omega_q/2)\hat{\sigma}_z + \omega_m\hat{b}^\dagger\hat{b} + g_{\rm em}(\hat{\sigma}_+\hat{b} + \hat{\sigma}_-\hat{b}^\dagger)$, with $g_{\rm em}$ linear in the applied bias voltage; at $50$ V the resolved-mode splitting and vacuum Rabi oscillations place the system in the strong-coupling regime. Using the qubit for state transfer and readout, the paper reports an intrinsic single-phonon lifetime of $T_1 = 25 \pm 2$ ms at $4.9$ GHz ($Q \approx 0.8\times10^9$), obtained by subtracting the inverse-Purcell contribution $\Gamma = \Gamma_i + (g_{\rm em}/\Delta)^2\kappa$ from raw lifetimes of $19$\textendash$21$ ms, and it confirms consistent lifetimes across an array of oscillators and across three phonon-number ranges. The same toolbox yields a phase-averaged Wigner function with negativity $W(0) = -0.10 \pm 0.02$ for the $|1\rangle_m$ Fock state, and voltage-tuned spectroscopy reveals about sixty individual defects whose coupling and Stark-shift statistics match the standard tunneling model of glassy TLS. Finally, Carr\textendash Purcell decoupling sequences executed through the qubit extend the mechanical coherence time from $T_2^* = 64 \pm 4\,\mu$s to $T_2^{\rm CP2} = 1.02 \pm 0.15$ ms, supporting the paper's framing of the system as a mechanical quantum memory for microwave photons.

Load-bearing premise

The headline $25$ ms lifetime rests on the assumption that mechanical decay through the qubit is exactly described by the inverse-Purcell formula $\Gamma = \Gamma_i + (g_{\rm em}/\Delta)^2\kappa$ with a fully characterized qubit decay rate $\kappa$; if that model or the measured $\kappa$ is inaccurate, the quoted intrinsic lifetime shifts.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Mechanical oscillators of this kind would store microwave-encoded quantum states for tens of milliseconds in footprints far smaller than planar resonators, making them practical bosonic memory elements.
  • The strong-coupling, high-cooperativity operation makes deterministic single-phonon preparation and measurement routine, and puts the strong dispersive regime\textendash\textendash universal control of a large phonon Hilbert space\textendash\textendash within reach.
  • Because the dominant dephasing is caused by slow TLS fluctuators, dynamical decoupling through the qubit recovers coherence to about 1 ms, and with higher-fidelity swap gates longer echo trains should push the coherence time toward the 25 ms energy-lifetime limit.
  • The observed TLS statistics and the absence of saturable loss at the single-phonon level indicate that dissipation is set by a sparse defect bath in the silicon, so phononic and surface engineering could push lifetimes still higher.
  • Reaching the strong dispersive regime would allow biased-noise bosonic qubits encoded in gighertz-frequency mechanical oscillators, a concrete route toward fault-tolerant quantum computation with mechanical elements.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A consequence the authors leave implicit: with $T_1$ already much longer than the transmon's own coherence, the practical ceiling on memory performance may shift from the mechanics to the qubit multiplexer, so improving transmon lifetimes or swap fidelities could pay off more than further phononic engineering.
  • Because the electrostatic coupling is material-agnostic, the same recipe could be transplanted to other ultralow-loss crystals, such as diamond or sapphire, where the TLS density might be even lower; fabricating the identical resonator geometry in a different crystal would be a direct test of whether silicon's surface TLS bath, rather than the design, sets the 25 ms number.
  • The voltage knob that tunes TLS frequencies could be used actively to park the oscillator away from its worst few fluctuators, a TLS-avoidance protocol suggested by the voltage dependence of the noise spectra but not proposed in the paper.
  • The measured TLS density and deformation potentials on the silicon beam provide a quantitative benchmark for the standard tunneling model in a nanostructure with an engineered phononic density of states, so surface passivation experiments that deplete the TLS bath and watch $T_2^*$ and the echo times move would be a clean, testable extension.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports a quantum electromechanical platform in which a transmon qubit is electrostatically coupled to a single-crystal silicon phononic-crystal nanomechanical resonator. The authors demonstrate strong coupling (gem/2π ≈ 200–230 kHz), ground-state cooling and thermometry (mechanics at 72 ± 9 mK), deterministic preparation of a single-phonon Fock state, and Wigner tomography with negativity W(0) = −0.10 ± 0.02. They measure single-phonon energy relaxation times of 19.3 ± 1.2 ms (mechanics A) and 21.1 ± 1.1 ms (mechanics B), and infer an intrinsic T1 = 25 ± 2 ms after subtracting an inverse-Purcell contribution. Ramsey coherence T2* ≈ 64 µs is extended via Hahn echo to 562 ± 42 µs and via Carr-Purcell-2 to 1.02 ± 0.15 ms. Spectroscopy as a function of bias voltage reveals a sparse bath of TLS defects with avoided crossings; the observed frequency noise, Lorentzian spectra, and echo efficiency are modeled with a phenomenological ensemble of telegrapher fluctuators. The paper argues that TLS-induced losses account for the residual dissipation, with an estimated total TLS loss rate ≈2π × 2.5 Hz close to the observed ≈2π × 6 Hz.

Significance. If the results hold, the system sets a new benchmark for quantum control of ultra-high-Q mechanical oscillators at microwave frequencies: it combines deterministic single-phonon state preparation, Wigner negativity, and millisecond-scale dynamical-decoupling-protected coherence in a compact silicon device, exceeding previous circuit quantum acoustodynamics lifetimes by two orders of magnitude. The central measurements—avoided crossings, linear gem(V), vacuum Rabi oscillations, and directly measured ~20 ms decays—are internally consistent and presented with stated uncertainties. The main quantitative milestone, the 25 ms intrinsic lifetime, depends on a model-based correction whose raw inputs are not fully disclosed; this is a transparency issue rather than evidence of error. The manuscript also provides a detailed and self-critical account of loss mechanisms, including explicit acknowledgment that the fluctuator model is phenomenological.

major comments (2)
  1. [Appendix H1, Eq. (H1), Fig. S10] The quoted intrinsic T1 = 25 ± 2 ms is not directly measured but obtained by subtracting the inverse-Purcell rate Γκ = (gem/Δ)² κ from the measured total rate. At the 30–40 MHz detunings used, with gem/2π ≈ 160 kHz at 40 V and κ ≈ 5.9 × 10⁵ s⁻¹, Γκ is ≈9–12 s⁻¹ against an intrinsic rate ≈40 s⁻¹, i.e., a 20–30% correction. The paper states that the model fits Fig. S10 but does not show the raw Γ(Δ) points, fit residuals, or the independently measured κ; the data-availability statement ('upon reasonable request') does not allow independent verification. Please provide the raw data, the measured κ with uncertainty, fit residuals, and a sensitivity analysis of T1 to plausible variations in κ and to deviations from the (g/Δ)² scaling. Without this, the 25 ms milestone is not checkable from the manuscript.
  2. [Mechanical decoherence, Fig. 4] The text states that relaxation is 'well explained by a single exponential' with 'no evidence of commonly observed degradation in the single-phonon regime.' However, the only data below ~1 phonon are the same decay traces used for the inverse-Purcell subtraction, and the correction is applied only at these low phonon numbers. A phonon-number-dependent intrinsic rate (e.g., weak saturable TLS loss) could be partially absorbed into the fitted intrinsic rate via the correction. The manuscript should show the uncorrected and corrected decay rates together with the phonon-number range of each measurement, and state explicitly how a saturable contribution would appear in the presented data.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Table SI] The caption for the decay-rate parameters contains a typo: 'Parameters κe,q and κe,q denote...' should read 'κe,q and κe,r'.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract states 'T2 ≈ 1 ms', while the main text reports T2^CP2 = 1.02 ± 0.15 ms; consider specifying that this is the Carr-Purcell-2 coherence time in the abstract.
  3. [Appendix I.2, Eq. (I3)] The symbol 'kbT' in Eq. (I3) and surrounding text should be typeset as k_B T to avoid ambiguity with the TLS decay rate Γ1,TLS.
  4. [Appendix J.1, Fig. S13b] In the caption and text, 'γmax = 105' appears without units; specify γmax = 10⁵ s⁻¹ as done in the main text of Appendix J.1.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity found; central claims are direct measurements with transparent model corrections.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are experimental measurements rather than derived predictions: the qubit-oscillator coupling, vacuum Rabi oscillations, Wigner negativity, and the directly measured mechanical decay and echo times are all presented as primary data. The headline intrinsic lifetime T1 = 25 ± 2 ms is obtained by fitting Eq. (H1) to detuning-dependent decay data (Fig. S10) and subtracting the inverse-Purcell contribution (g_em/Δ)^2 κ; this is a standard, transparent model-based extraction, not a prediction forced by the input, and the directly measured single-phonon decays (19.3 and 21.1 ms) are also reported. Self-citations to refs. [14] and [28] support design ingredients such as phononic shields and electrostatic coupling, but the present device's measured lifetimes, coherence times, and non-classical state tomography do not reduce to those citations. The paper explicitly flags the telegrapher dephasing model as phenomenological (Appendix J1: 'the probability distribution ... is phenomenological') and the TLS volume estimate as uncertain (Appendix I2), which correctly characterizes those parts as modeling rather than first-principles derivations. The data-availability statement ('upon reasonable request') limits independent reprocessing of the Purcell-corrected lifetime, but this is a reproducibility and transparency caveat, not a circularity. No equation or claim was found to be equivalent to its own input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central measurements (T1, g_em, Wigner negativity, coherence times) do not depend on free parameters; the free parameters listed belong to the TLS loss and dephasing analysis, which supports the physical interpretation but is not required for the memory demonstration. The assumptions are standard circuit-QED and TLS models, plus a simulation-based claim that phononic shields make clamping loss negligible.

free parameters (3)
  • Fastest fluctuator switching rate gamma_max = 10^5 s^-1
    Appendix J1 fits the Hahn echo decay with Eq. (J10) using gamma_max = 10^5 s^-1; the quantitative echo improvement claim relies on this value, which the authors take from prior TLS observations.
  • TLS spectral density rho = 14 GHz^-1
    Estimated in Appendix I2 from assumed amorphous surface volume (0.04 um^3), literature P_D ~ 5e44 (J m^3)^-1, and an upper bound of 13.8 GHz^-1 from avoided crossings; used for TLS loss and dephasing estimates.
  • TLS-mechanics coupling rates g_TLS/2pi and g_TLS,l/2pi = approx 1 MHz and approx 0.6 MHz
    Computed from assumed deformation potential (about 1 eV) and FEM strain, not direct fits; used in resonant-loss and relaxation-damping predictions.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Rotating-wave approximation and two-level truncation of the transmon (Appendix B1, Eq. B8)
    Used to write the Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian and define g_em; standard for circuit QED.
  • domain assumption Standard tunneling model for TLS defects (Appendix I2 and K)
    Assumes TLS distributed with tunneling-model parameters and coupled through strain; supported by avoided crossings but the model is assumed.
  • domain assumption Phononic shields reduce clamping loss to about 1 mHz (Appendix C and I1)
    Simulation-based estimate with 4 nm disorder; if wrong, the attribution of loss to TLS would change.
  • domain assumption Mechanical mode reaches thermal equilibrium with the bath after about 60 ms wait (Appendix F)
    Used for thermometry and ground-state preparation; the wait time is much longer than T1, making the assumption reasonable.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A mechanical quantum memory for microwave photons." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/H67GV5NQ

@misc{pith2026241208006,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A mechanical quantum memory for microwave photons},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/H67GV5NQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.08006}
}
abstract

Long-lived mechanical oscillators are actively pursued as critical resources for quantum storage, sensing, and transduction. However, achieving deterministic quantum control while limiting mechanical dissipation remains a persistent challenge. Here, we demonstrate strong coupling between a transmon superconducting qubit and an ultra-long-lived nanomechanical oscillator ($T_\text{1} \approx 25 \text{ ms}$ at 5 GHz, $Q \approx 0.8 \times 10^9$) by leveraging the low acoustic loss in silicon and phononic bandgap engineering. The qubit-oscillator system achieves large cooperativity ($C_{T_1}\approx 1.5\times10^5$, $C_{T_2}\approx 150$), enabling the generation of non-classical states and the investigation of mechanisms underlying mechanical decoherence. We show that dynamical decoupling$\unicode{x2014}$implemented through the qubit$\unicode{x2014}$can mitigate decoherence, leading to a mechanical coherence time of $T_2\approx 1 \text{ ms}$. These findings extend the exceptional storage capabilities of mechanical oscillators to the quantum regime, putting them forward as compact bosonic elements for future applications in quantum computing and metrology.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.08006 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. ). This lifetime is remarkably long, more than two orders of magnitude beyond state-of-the-art circuit quan￾tum acoustodynamics (cQAD) systems [10, 19, 40]. We further investigate the mechanical lifetime in our plat￾form by conducting experiments on different devices and across a wide range of phonon numbers, finding consis￾tent results in the same vicinity (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: b). From these measurements, we extract the spec￾tral density and the statistical distributions of the defor￾mation potential and dipole orientations, finding them to be in general agreement with the standard tunneling model [49] (see Appendix K). Notably, we observe p…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

120 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    DC voltage setup The DC voltage for electrostatic biasing is applied with a Stanford Research Systems DC205 voltage source, whose power supply is filtered with an Onfilter CleanSweep AC EMI filter. The twisted pair lines that carry the DC voltage to the device are further filtered at the 4 K stage breakout with an Aivon Therma-uD25-GL cryogenic RC lowpass...

  2. [2]

    Impact of voltage bias on qubit 0 10 20 30 Voltage (V) 1.4 1.6 1.8Qubit Lifetime (µs) 0 1 2 3 4 Time (hours) 1 1.5 2 Qubit Lifetime (µs) a b c 0 2 4 6 8 Time (µs) 0 0.4 0.8 1.2Pe 50 V 0 V T1 = 1.67 ± 0.04 µs T1 = 1.70 ± 0.03 µs 0 10 20 30 Voltage (V) -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 fq (MHz) d FIG. S6. DC voltage effects on qubit. a, Qubit T1 lifetime as the voltage is ra...

  3. [3]

    In our experiments, the maximum voltage we could reach of 50 V was set by the bias- T

    Leakage current measurements We have discussed in detail the effects of the voltage bias on the qubit, through time domain characterization and thermometry measurements. In our experiments, the maximum voltage we could reach of 50 V was set by the bias- T. However, for future experiments, understanding the maximum voltage that the devices can endure is im...

  4. [4]

    The measured decay rate of the mechanics can therefore be expressed as the sum of intrinsic and inverse Purcell decay rates, Γ = Γi + Γκ

    The inverse Purcell decay In our qubit-mechanics coupled system, the mechanical oscillators experience inverse Purcell decay due to their interaction with a much shorter-lived qubit, which limits their lifetime, particularly at small detunings. The measured decay rate of the mechanics can therefore be expressed as the sum of intrinsic and inverse Purcell ...

  5. [5]

    Subsequently, we wait for a varying time interval t, followed by a measurement of the qubit frequency

    Intermediate-phonon-number measurement To measure mechanical lifetime at intermediate phonon numbers, we apply a 1 ms-long tone, resonant with the mechanical oscillator, through the qubit to excite the oscillator. Subsequently, we wait for a varying time interval t, followed by a measurement of the qubit frequency. The excitation of the mechanical oscilla...

  6. [6]

    High-phonon-number measurement To determine the phonon number in the oscillator, we measure the emitted power from the mechanical oscillator into the waveguide. The relation is given by the expression [28]: Pout = nph ℏωmκe,m 2 , (H3) where Pout is the output power, nph is the phonon number in the oscillator, ωm is the frequency of the mechanical oscillat...

  7. [7]

    Acoustic radiation We first investigate the loss experienced by the mechanical oscillators due to the radiation of acoustic energy through the clamping points to the substrate [88]. The acoustic shields that clamp our oscillators are designed to suppress this effect strongly by having a large band gap ( ≈ 2 GHz) roughly centered at the oscillator resonanc...

  8. [8]

    However, defects in the form of TLS are known to be a source of dissipation for acoustic systems at these temperatures [14, 89, 90]

    Mechanics-TLS interaction At our measured bath temperatures of ∼ 70 mK, acoustic loss mechanisms originating from phonon-phonon inter- actions, such as Landau-Rumer and thermoelastic damping, are expected to be negligible [14]. However, defects in the form of TLS are known to be a source of dissipation for acoustic systems at these temperatures [14, 89, 9...

Show all 120 references
  1. [9]

    The TLS interacts with our oscillator through the strain field associated with mechanical motion. The dynamics of the interaction can be described by a Hamiltonian of the form [44] ˆHTLS-m/ℏ = (gTLS ˆσx,TLS + gTLS,ℓ ˆσz,TLS)(ˆb† + ˆb), (I1) where ˆσx,TLS and ˆσz,TLS are Pauli ...

  2. [10]

    Resonant TLS loss We first focus on loss due to the transverse mechanics-TLS interaction, described in Eq. (I1). The transverse interaction gives rise to energy exchange between the mechanical oscillator and the TLS when they are resonant, leading to acoustic loss. This acoust...

  3. [11]

    The longitudinal inter- action in Eq

    Relaxation damping We next explore the loss due to the longitudinal interaction between mechanics and TLS. The longitudinal inter- action in Eq. (I1), manifests itself as a modulation of the TLS energy due to the acoustic displacement, moving it out of thermal equilibrium. The...

  4. [12]

    telegrapher

    Dephasing theory For the Gaussian theory of dephasing, we reproduce previous analyses [51]. The frequency noise is commonly investigated in physical systems via measurements of free induction and echo. The free induction signal ( fz,R) is related to the frequency noise δω thro...

    2000

  5. [13]

    A method to measure the frequency of the mechanical oscillator is to rely on the fringes in Ramsey measurements

    Power spectral density Mechanical frequency noise can be investigated through repeated measurements of the oscillation frequency, where the noise manifests itself as frequency fluctuations. A method to measure the frequency of the mechanical oscillator is to rely on the fringe...

  6. [14]

    C. T.-c. Nguyen, MEMS technology for timing and fre- quency control, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Fer- roelectrics, and Frequency Control 54, 251 (2007)

    2007

  7. [15]

    C. C. W. Ruppel, Acoustic Wave Filter Technology– 27 A Review, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferro- electrics, and Frequency Control 64, 1390 (2017)

    2017

  8. [16]

    Z. F. Syed, P. Aggarwal, C. Goodall, X. Niu, and N. El- Sheimy, A new multi-position calibration method for MEMS inertial navigation systems, Measurement Sci- ence and Technology 18, 1897 (2007)

    2007

  9. [17]

    C. K. O’Sullivan and G. G. Guilbault, Commercial quartz crystal microbalances – theory and applications, Biosensors and Bioelectronics 14, 663 (1999)

    1999

  10. [18]

    Mason, J

    D. Mason, J. Chen, M. Rossi, Y. Tsaturyan, and A. Schliesser, Continuous force and displacement mea- surement below the standard quantum limit, Nature Physics 15, 745 (2019)

    2019

  11. [19]

    K. C. McCormick, J. Keller, S. C. Burd, D. J. Wineland, A. C. Wilson, and D. Leibfried, Quantum-enhanced sensing of a single-ion mechanical oscillator, Nature 572, 86 (2019)

    2019

  12. [20]

    Pikovski, M

    I. Pikovski, M. R. Vanner, M. Aspelmeyer, M. S. Kim, and ˇC. Brukner, Probing Planck-scale physics with quantum optics, Nature Physics 8, 393 (2012)

    2012

  13. [21]

    Arndt and K

    M. Arndt and K. Hornberger, Testing the limits of quan- tum mechanical superpositions, Nature Physics 10, 271 (2014)

    2014

  14. [22]

    Qiao, ´E

    H. Qiao, ´E. Dumur, G. Andersson, H. Yan, M.-H. Chou, J. Grebel, C. R. Conner, Y. J. Joshi, J. M. Miller, R. G. Povey, X. Wu, and A. N. Cleland, Splitting phonons: Building a platform for linear mechanical quantum com- puting, Science 380, 1030 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    Y. Yang, I. Kladari´ c, M. Drimmer, U. Von L¨ upke, D. Lenterman, J. Bus, S. Marti, M. Fadel, and Y. Chu, A mechanical qubit, Science 386, 783 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    Barzanjeh, A

    S. Barzanjeh, A. Xuereb, S. Gr¨ oblacher, M. Paternos- tro, C. A. Regal, and E. M. Weig, Optomechanics for quantum technologies, Nature Physics 18, 15 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    Galliou, M

    S. Galliou, M. Goryachev, R. Bourquin, P. Abb´ e, J. P. Aubry, and M. E. Tobar, Extremely Low Loss Phonon- Trapping Cryogenic Acoustic Cavities for Future Phys- ical Experiments, Scientific Reports 3, 2132 (2013)

    2013

  18. [26]

    N. J. Engelsen, A. Beccari, and T. J. Kippenberg, Ultrahigh-quality-factor micro- and nanomechanical resonators using dissipation dilution, Nature Nanotech- nology 19, 725 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    G. S. MacCabe, H. Ren, J. Luo, J. D. Cohen, H. Zhou, A. Sipahigil, M. Mirhosseini, and O. Painter, Nano- acoustic resonator with ultralong phonon lifetime, Sci- ence 370, 840 (2020)

    2020

  20. [28]

    K. J. Satzinger, Y. P. Zhong, H.-S. Chang, G. A. Peairs, A. Bienfait, M.-H. Chou, A. Y. Cleland, C. R. Conner, ´E. Dumur, J. Grebel, I. Gutierrez, B. H. November, R. G. Povey, S. J. Whiteley, D. D. Awschalom, D. I. Schuster, and A. N. Cleland, Quantum control of surface acoust...

    2018

  21. [29]

    Bienfait, Y

    A. Bienfait, Y. P. Zhong, H.-S. Chang, M.-H. Chou, C. R. Conner, ´E. Dumur, J. Grebel, G. A. Peairs, R. G. Povey, K. J. Satzinger, and A. N. Cleland, Quantum Erasure Using Entangled Surface Acoustic Phonons, Physical Review X 10, 021055 (2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    Y. Chu, P. Kharel, T. Yoon, L. Frunzio, P. T. Rakich, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Creation and control of multi- phonon Fock states in a bulk acoustic-wave resonator, Nature 563, 666 (2018)

    2018

  23. [31]

    M. Bild, M. Fadel, Y. Yang, U. von L¨ upke, P. Mar- tin, A. Bruno, and Y. Chu, Schr¨ odinger cat states of a 16-microgram mechanical oscillator, Science 380, 274 (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    E. A. Wollack, A. Y. Cleland, R. G. Gruenke, Z. Wang, P. Arrangoiz-Arriola, and A. H. Safavi-Naeini, Quantum state preparation and tomography of entangled mechan- ical resonators, Nature 604, 463 (2022)

    2022

  25. [33]

    D. F. McGuigan, C. C. Lam, R. Q. Gram, A. W. Hoff- man, D. H. Douglass, and H. W. Gutche, Measurements of the mechanical Q of single-crystal silicon at low tem- peratures, Journal of Low Temperature Physics 30, 621 (1978)

    1978

  26. [34]

    Ganjam, Y

    S. Ganjam, Y. Wang, Y. Lu, A. Banerjee, C. U. Lei, L. Krayzman, K. Kisslinger, C. Zhou, R. Li, Y. Jia, M. Liu, L. Frunzio, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Surpassing millisecond coherence in on chip superconducting quan- tum memories by optimizing materials and circuit de- sign, Nature ...

    2024

  27. [35]

    K. D. Crowley, R. A. McLellan, A. Dutta, N. Shumiya, A. P. M. Place, X. H. Le, Y. Gang, T. Madhavan, M. P. Bland, R. Chang, N. Khedkar, Y. C. Feng, E. A. Um- barkar, X. Gui, L. V. H. Rodgers, Y. Jia, M. M. Feld- man, S. A. Lyon, M. Liu, R. J. Cava, A. A. Houck, and N. P. de Le...

    2023

  28. [36]

    Tuokkola, Y

    M. Tuokkola, Y. Sunada, H. Kivij¨ arvi, J. Al- banese, L. Gr¨ onberg, J.-P. Kaikkonen, V. Vester- inen, J. Govenius, and M. M¨ ott¨ onen, Methods to achieve near-millisecond energy relaxation and dephas- ing times for a superconducting transmon qubit (2024), arXiv:2407.18778 [...

    2024 arXiv

  29. [37]

    C. T. Hann, C.-L. Zou, Y. Zhang, Y. Chu, R. J. Schoelkopf, S. M. Girvin, and L. Jiang, Hardware- Efficient Quantum Random Access Memory with Hy- brid Quantum Acoustic Systems, Physical Review Let- ters 123, 250501 (2019)

    2019

  30. [38]

    Chamberland, K

    C. Chamberland, K. Noh, P. Arrangoiz-Arriola, E. T. Campbell, C. T. Hann, J. Iverson, H. Putterman, T. C. Bohdanowicz, S. T. Flammia, A. Keller, G. Refael, J. Preskill, L. Jiang, A. H. Safavi-Naeini, O. Painter, and F. G. Brand˜ ao, Building a Fault-Tolerant Quan- tum Computer...

    2022

  31. [39]

    W. Cai, Y. Ma, W. Wang, C.-L. Zou, and L. Sun, Bosonic quantum error correction codes in supercon- ducting quantum circuits, Fundamental Research 1, 50 (2021)

    2021

  32. [40]

    X. Deng, S. Li, Z.-J. Chen, Z. Ni, Y. Cai, J. Mai, L. Zhang, P. Zheng, H. Yu, C.-L. Zou, S. Liu, F. Yan, Y. Xu, and D. Yu, Quantum-enhanced metrology with large Fock states, Nature Physics , 1 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    Bozkurt, H

    A. Bozkurt, H. Zhao, C. Joshi, H. G. LeDuc, P. K. Day, and M. Mirhosseini, A quantum electromechani- cal interface for long-lived phonons, Nature Physics , 1 (2023)

    2023

  34. [42]

    Pirkkalainen, S

    J.-M. Pirkkalainen, S. U. Cho, J. Li, G. S. Paraoanu, P. J. Hakonen, and M. A. Sillanp¨ a¨ a, Hybrid circuit cav- ity quantum electrodynamics with a micromechanical resonator, Nature 494, 211 (2013)

    2013

  35. [43]

    X. Ma, J. J. Viennot, S. Kotler, J. D. Teufel, and K. W. Lehnert, Non-classical energy squeezing of a macro- scopic mechanical oscillator, Nature Physics 17, 322 (2021)

    2021

  36. [44]

    M. D. LaHaye, J. Suh, P. M. Echternach, K. C. Schwab, 28 and M. L. Roukes, Nanomechanical measurements of a superconducting qubit, Nature 459, 960 (2009)

    2009

  37. [45]

    E. A. Wollack, A. Y. Cleland, P. Arrangoiz-Arriola, T. P. McKenna, R. G. Gruenke, R. N. Patel, W. Jiang, C. J. Sarabalis, and A. H. Safavi-Naeini, Loss channels affecting lithium niobate phononic crystal resonators at cryogenic temperature, Applied Physics Letters 118, 123501 (2021)

    2021

  38. [46]

    W. P. Mason and H. J. McSkimin, Attenuation and Scattering of High Frequency Sound Waves in Metals and Glasses, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 19, 464 (1947)

    1947

  39. [47]

    Jeffrey, D

    E. Jeffrey, D. Sank, J. Y. Mutus, T. C. White, J. Kelly, R. Barends, Y. Chen, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, A. Megrant, P. J. J. O’Malley, C. Neill, P. Roushan, A. Vainsencher, J. Wenner, A. N. Cleland, and J. M. Martinis, Fast Accurate State Measurement with Superconducti...

    2014

  40. [48]

    D. Sank, A. Opremcak, A. Bengtsson, M. Khezri, Z. Chen, O. Naaman, and A. Korotkov, System Char- acterization of Dispersive Readout in Superconducting Qubits, https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.00413v1 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Zhang, B

    Y. Zhang, B. J. Lester, Y. Y. Gao, L. Jiang, R. J. Schoelkopf, and S. M. Girvin, Engineering bilinear mode coupling in circuit QED: Theory and experiment, Phys- ical Review A 99, 012314 (2019)

    2019

  42. [50]

    Rouxinol, Y

    F. Rouxinol, Y. Hao, F. Brito, A. O. Caldeira, E. K. Irish, and M. D. LaHaye, Measurements of nanoresonator-qubit interactions in a hybrid quantum electromechanical system, Nanotechnology 27, 364003 (2016)

    2016

  43. [51]

    Catto, W

    G. Catto, W. Liu, S. Kundu, V. Lahtinen, V. Vesteri- nen, and M. M¨ ott¨ onen, Microwave response of a metallic superconductor subject to a high-voltage gate electrode, Scientific Reports 12, 6822 (2022)

    2022

  44. [52]

    Geerlings, Z

    K. Geerlings, Z. Leghtas, I. M. Pop, S. Shankar, L. Frun- zio, R. J. Schoelkopf, M. Mirrahimi, and M. H. Devoret, Demonstrating a Driven Reset Protocol for a Super- conducting Qubit, Physical Review Letters 110, 120501 (2013)

    2013

  45. [53]

    Bienfait, K

    A. Bienfait, K. J. Satzinger, Y. P. Zhong, H.-S. Chang, M.-H. Chou, C. R. Conner, ´E. Dumur, J. Grebel, G. A. Peairs, R. G. Povey, and A. N. Cleland, Phonon- mediated quantum state transfer and remote qubit en- tanglement, Science 364, 368 (2019)

    2019

  46. [54]

    A. Y. Cleland, E. A. Wollack, and A. H. Safavi-Naeini, Studying phonon coherence with a quantum sensor, Na- ture Communications 15, 4979 (2024)

    2024

  47. [55]

    A. L. Emser, C. Metzger, B. C. Rose, and K. W. Lehn- ert, Thin-film quartz for high-coherence piezoelectric phononic crystal resonators (2024), arXiv:2406.14660

    2024 arXiv

  48. [56]

    R. N. Kleiman, G. Agnolet, and D. J. Bishop, Two- level systems observed in the mechanical properties of single-crystal silicon at low temperatures, Physical Re- view Letters 59, 2079 (1987)

    1987

  49. [57]

    R. O. Behunin, F. Intravaia, and P. T. Rakich, Dimen- sional transformation of defect-induced noise, dissipa- tion, and nonlinearity, Physical Review B 93, 224110 (2016)

    2016

  50. [58]

    von L¨ upke, Y

    U. von L¨ upke, Y. Yang, M. Bild, L. Michaud, M. Fadel, and Y. Chu, Parity measurement in the strong disper- sive regime of circuit quantum acoustodynamics, Nature Physics 18, 794 (2022)

    2022

  51. [59]

    Wallucks, I

    A. Wallucks, I. Marinkovi´ c, B. Hensen, R. Stockill, and S. Gr¨ oblacher, A quantum memory at telecom wave- lengths, Nature Physics 16, 772 (2020)

    2020

  52. [60]

    Lisenfeld, A

    J. Lisenfeld, A. Bilmes, A. Megrant, R. Barends, J. Kelly, P. Klimov, G. Weiss, J. M. Martinis, and A. V. Ustinov, Electric field spectroscopy of material defects in transmon qubits, npj Quantum Information 5, 105 (2019)

    2019

  53. [61]

    Sarabi, A

    B. Sarabi, A. N. Ramanayaka, A. L. Burin, F. C. Well- stood, and K. D. Osborn, Projected Dipole Moments of Individual Two-Level Defects Extracted Using Cir- cuit Quantum Electrodynamics, Physical Review Let- ters 116, 167002 (2016)

    2016

  54. [62]

    W. A. Phillips, Two-level states in glasses, Reports on Progress in Physics 50, 1657 (1987)

    1987

  55. [63]

    H. Y. Carr and E. M. Purcell, Effects of Diffusion on Free Precession in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Exper- iments, Physical Review 94, 630 (1954)

    1954

  56. [64]

    Ithier, E

    G. Ithier, E. Collin, P. Joyez, P. J. Meeson, D. Vion, D. Esteve, F. Chiarello, A. Shnirman, Y. Makhlin, J. Schriefl, and G. Sch¨ on, Decoherence in a supercon- ducting quantum bit circuit, Physical Review B 72, 134519 (2005)

    2005

  57. [65]

    Bylander, S

    J. Bylander, S. Gustavsson, F. Yan, F. Yoshihara, K. Harrabi, G. Fitch, D. G. Cory, Y. Nakamura, J.-S. Tsai, and W. D. Oliver, Noise spectroscopy through dy- namical decoupling with a superconducting flux qubit, Nature Physics 7, 565 (2011)

    2011

  58. [66]

    Chakram, K

    S. Chakram, K. He, A. V. Dixit, A. E. Oriani, R. K. Naik, N. Leung, H. Kwon, W.-L. Ma, L. Jiang, and D. I. Schuster, Multimode photon blockade, Nature Physics 18, 879 (2022)

    2022

  59. [67]

    S. M. Lewis, M. S. Hunt, G. A. DeRose, H. R. Alty, J. Li, A. Wertheim, L. De Rose, G. A. Timco, A. Scherer, S. G. Yeates, and R. E. P. Winpenny, Plasma-Etched Pattern Transfer of Sub-10 nm Structures Using a Metal–Organic Resist and Helium Ion Beam Lithogra- phy, Nano Letters ...

    2019

  60. [68]

    Najera-Santos, R

    B.-L. Najera-Santos, R. Rousseau, K. Gerashchenko, H. Patange, A. Riva, M. Villiers, T. Briant, P.-F. Cohadon, A. Heidmann, J. Palomo, M. Rosticher, H. le Sueur, A. Sarlette, W. C. Smith, Z. Leghtas, E. Flurin, T. Jacqmin, and S. Del´ eglise, High-Sensitivity ac-Charge Detecti...

    2024

  61. [69]

    N. R. Lee, Y. Guo, A. Y. Cleland, E. A. Wollack, R. G. Gruenke, T. Makihara, Z. Wang, T. Rajabzadeh, W. Jiang, F. M. Mayor, P. Arrangoiz-Arriola, C. J. Sarabalis, and A. H. Safavi-Naeini, Strong Dispersive Coupling Between a Mechanical Resonator and a Fluxo- nium Superconducti...

    2023

  62. [70]

    Rosenberg, D

    D. Rosenberg, D. Kim, R. Das, D. Yost, S. Gustavs- son, D. Hover, P. Krantz, A. Melville, L. Racz, G. O. Samach, S. J. Weber, F. Yan, J. L. Yoder, A. J. Ker- man, and W. D. Oliver, 3D integrated superconducting qubits, npj Quantum Information 3, 1 (2017)

    2017

  63. [71]

    C. R. Conner, A. Bienfait, H.-S. Chang, M.-H. Chou, ´E. Dumur, J. Grebel, G. A. Peairs, R. G. Povey, H. Yan, Y. P. Zhong, and A. N. Cleland, Superconducting qubits in a flip-chip architecture, Applied Physics Letters 118, 232602 (2021). 29

    2021

  64. [72]

    Guillaud and M

    J. Guillaud and M. Mirrahimi, Repetition Cat Qubits for Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation, Physical Re- view X 9, 041053 (2019)

    2019

  65. [73]

    D. K. Tuckett, S. D. Bartlett, and S. T. Flammia, Ul- trahigh Error Threshold for Surface Codes with Biased Noise, Physical Review Letters 120, 050505 (2018)

    2018

  66. [74]

    Neuman, M

    T. Neuman, M. Eichenfield, M. E. Trusheim, L. Hackett, P. Narang, and D. Englund, A phononic interface be- tween a superconducting quantum processor and quan- tum networked spin memories, npj Quantum Informa- tion 7, 1 (2021)

    2021

  67. [75]

    A. J. Keller, P. B. Dieterle, M. Fang, B. Berger, J. M. Fink, and O. Painter, Al transmon qubits on silicon- on-insulator for quantum device integration, Applied Physics Letters 111, 042603 (2017)

    2017

  68. [76]

    K. W. Lehnert, Introduction to Microwave Cavity Op- tomechanics, in Cavity Optomechanics: Nano- and Mi- cromechanical Resonators Interacting with Light, edited by M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2014) pp. 233–252

    2014

  69. [77]

    J. Koch, T. M. Yu, J. Gambetta, A. A. Houck, D. I. Schuster, J. Majer, A. Blais, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box, Physical Re- view A 76, 042319 (2007)

    2007

  70. [78]

    S. M. Girvin, Circuit QED: Superconducting qubits coupled to microwave photons, in Quantum Machines: Measurement and Control of Engineered Quantum Sys- tems, edited by M. Devoret, B. Huard, R. Schoelkopf, and L. F. Cugliandolo (Oxford University Press, Oxford,

  71. [79]

    Hofheinz, H

    M. Hofheinz, H. Wang, M. Ansmann, R. C. Bialczak, E. Lucero, M. Neeley, A. D. O’Connell, D. Sank, J. Wen- ner, J. M. Martinis, and A. N. Cleland, Synthesizing ar- bitrary quantum states in a superconducting resonator, Nature 459, 546 (2009)

    2009

  72. [80]

    J. Chan, A. H. Safavi-Naeini, J. T. Hill, S. Meenehan, and O. Painter, Optimized optomechanical crystal cav- ity with acoustic radiation shield, Applied Physics Let- ters 101, 081115 (2012)

    2012

  73. [81]

    Moraes, G

    F. Moraes, G. H. M. De Aguiar, E. G. De Melo, G. S. Wiederhecker, and T. P. M. Alegre, Optimization of di- amond optomechanical crystal cavities, Journal of the Optical Society of America B 39, 2735 (2022)

    2022

  74. [82]

    D. M. Olsson and L. S. Nelson, The Nelder-Mead Sim- plex Procedure for Function Minimization, Technomet- rics 17, 45 (1975)

    1975

  75. [83]

    Minkov, U

    M. Minkov, U. P. Dharanipathy, R. Houdr´ e, and V. Savona, Statistics of the disorder-induced losses of high-Q photonic crystal cavities, Optics Express 21, 28233 (2013)

    2013

  76. [84]

    M. D. Hutchings, J. B. Hertzberg, Y. Liu, N. T. Bronn, G. A. Keefe, M. Brink, J. M. Chow, and B. L. T. Plourde, Tunable Superconducting Qubits with Flux- Independent Coherence, Physical Review Applied 8, 044003 (2017)

    2017

  77. [85]

    M. D. Reed, B. R. Johnson, A. A. Houck, L. Di- Carlo, J. M. Chow, D. I. Schuster, L. Frunzio, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Fast reset and suppressing sponta- neous emission of a superconducting qubit, Applied Physics Letters 96, 203110 (2010)

    2010

  78. [86]

    M. D. LaHaye, F. Rouxinol, Y. Hao, S.-B. Shim, and E. K. Irish, Superconducting circuitry for quantum elec- tromechanical systems, in Quantum Information and Computation XIII, Vol. 9500 (SPIE, 2015) pp. 276–295

    2015

  79. [87]

    C. Wang, Y. Y. Gao, I. M. Pop, U. Vool, C. Axline, T. Brecht, R. W. Heeres, L. Frunzio, M. H. Devoret, G. Catelani, L. I. Glazman, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Mea- surement and control of quasiparticle dynamics in a su- perconducting qubit, Nature Communications 5, 5836 (2014)

    2014

  80. [88]

    Catelani, R

    G. Catelani, R. J. Schoelkopf, M. H. Devoret, and L. I. Glazman, Relaxation and frequency shifts induced by quasiparticles in superconducting qubits, Physical Re- view B 84, 064517 (2011)

    2011

  81. [89]

    X. Y. Jin, A. Kamal, A. P. Sears, T. Gudmundsen, D. Hover, J. Miloshi, R. Slattery, F. Yan, J. Yoder, T. P. Orlando, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, Thermal and Residual Excited-State Population in a 3D Transmon Qubit, Physical Review Letters 114, 240501 (2015)

    2015

  82. [90]

    M. F. Ritter, A. Fuhrer, D. Z. Haxell, S. Hart, P. Gu- mann, H. Riel, and F. Nichele, A superconducting switch actuated by injection of high-energy electrons, Nature Communications 12, 1266 (2021)

    2021

  83. [91]

    J. R. Johansson, P. D. Nation, and F. Nori, QuTiP 2: A Python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems, Computer Physics Communications 184, 1234 (2013)

    2013

  84. [92]

    J. R. Johansson, P. D. Nation, and F. Nori, QuTiP: An open-source Python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems, Computer Physics Communications 183, 1760 (2012)

    2012

  85. [93]

    M. V. P. Alto´ e, A. Banerjee, C. Berk, A. Hajr, A. Schwartzberg, C. Song, M. Alghadeer, S. Aloni, M. J. Elowson, J. M. Kreikebaum, E. K. Wong, S. M. Griffin, S. Rao, A. Weber-Bargioni, A. M. Minor, D. I. Santiago, S. Cabrini, I. Siddiqi, and D. F. Ogletree, Localization and M...

    2022

  86. [94]

    A. I. Lvovsky, H. Hansen, T. Aichele, O. Benson, J. Mlynek, and S. Schiller, Quantum State Reconstruc- tion of the Single-Photon Fock State, Physical Review Letters 87, 050402 (2001)

    2001

  87. [95]

    Grant and S

    M. Grant and S. Boyd, CVX: Matlab software for disciplined convex programming, version 2.1, https: //cvxr.com/cvx (2014)

    2014

  88. [96]

    Grant and S

    M. Grant and S. Boyd, Graph implementations for non- smooth convex programs, in Recent Advances in Learn- ing and Control, Lecture Notes in Control and Infor- mation Sciences, edited by V. Blondel, S. Boyd, and H. Kimura (Springer-Verlag Limited, 2008) pp. 95–110, http://stanf...

    2008

  89. [97]

    E. A. Sete, J. M. Gambetta, and A. N. Korotkov, Pur- cell effect with microwave drive: Suppression of qubit relaxation rate, Physical Review B 89, 104516 (2014)

    2014

  90. [98]

    Carroll, S

    M. Carroll, S. Rosenblatt, P. Jurcevic, I. Lauer, and A. Kandala, Dynamics of superconducting qubit relax- ation times, npj Quantum Information 8, 132 (2022)

    2022

  91. [99]

    Blais, A

    A. Blais, A. L. Grimsmo, S. M. Girvin, and A. Wallraff, Circuit quantum electrodynamics, Reviews of Modern Physics 93, 025005 (2021)

    2021

  92. [100]

    Kristen, A

    M. Kristen, A. Schneider, A. Stehli, T. Wolz, S. Danilin, H. S. Ku, J. Long, X. Wu, R. Lake, D. P. Pappas, A. V. Ustinov, and M. Weides, Amplitude and frequency sens- ing of microwave fields with a superconducting trans- mon qudit, npj Quantum Information 6, 57 (2020)

    2020

  93. [101]

    Schl¨ or, J

    S. Schl¨ or, J. Lisenfeld, C. M¨ uller, A. Bilmes, A. Schnei- der, D. P. Pappas, A. V. Ustinov, and M. Weides, Cor- relating Decoherence in Transmon Qubits: Low Fre- quency Noise by Single Fluctuators, Physical Review Letters 123, 190502 (2019)

    2019

  94. [102]

    K. L. Ekinci and M. L. Roukes, Nanoelectromechanical systems, Review of Scientific Instruments 76, 061101 (2005)

    2005

  95. [103]

    Andersson, A

    G. Andersson, A. L. O. Bilobran, M. Scigliuzzo, M. M. 30 de Lima, J. H. Cole, and P. Delsing, Acoustic spectral hole-burning in a two-level system ensemble, npj Quan- tum Information 7, 1 (2021)

    2021

  96. [104]

    B. D. Hauer, P. H. Kim, C. Doolin, F. Souris, and J. P. Davis, Two-level system damping in a quasi-one- dimensional optomechanical resonator, Physical Review B 98, 214303 (2018)

    2018

  97. [105]

    M¨ uller, J

    C. M¨ uller, J. H. Cole, and J. Lisenfeld, Towards un- derstanding two-level-systems in amorphous solids: In- sights from quantum circuits, Reports on Progress in Physics 82, 124501 (2019)

    2019

  98. [106]

    Woods, G

    W. Woods, G. Calusine, A. Melville, A. Sevi, E. Golden, D. Kim, D. Rosenberg, J. Yoder, and W. Oliver, Deter- mining Interface Dielectric Losses in Superconducting Coplanar-Waveguide Resonators, Physical Review Ap- plied 12, 014012 (2019)

    2019

  99. [108]

    Ramos, V

    T. Ramos, V. Sudhir, K. Stannigel, P. Zoller, and T. J. Kippenberg, Nonlinear Quantum Optomechanics via In- dividual Intrinsic Two-Level Defects, Physical Review Letters 110, 193602 (2013)

    2013

  100. [109]

    M. Odeh, K. Godeneli, E. Li, R. Tangirala, H. Zhou, X. Zhang, Z.-H. Zhang, and A. Sipahigil, Non- Markovian dynamics of a superconducting qubit in a phononic bandgap (2023), arXiv:2312.01031 [quant-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  101. [110]

    Lisenfeld, A

    J. Lisenfeld, A. Bilmes, S. Matityahu, S. Zanker, M. Marthaler, M. Schechter, G. Sch¨ on, A. Shnirman, G. Weiss, and A. V. Ustinov, Decoherence spectroscopy with individual two-level tunneling defects, Scientific Reports 6, 23786 (2016)

    2016

  102. [111]

    Shalibo, Y

    Y. Shalibo, Y. Rofe, D. Shwa, F. Zeides, M. Neeley, J. M. Martinis, and N. Katz, Lifetime and Coherence of Two-Level Defects in a Josephson Junction, Physical Review Letters 105, 177001 (2010)

    2010

  103. [112]

    M. Chen, J. C. Owens, H. Putterman, M. Sch¨ afer, and O. Painter, Phonon engineering of atomic-scale defects in superconducting quantum circuits, Science Advances 10, eado6240 (2024)

    2024

  104. [113]

    S. E. de Graaf, L. Faoro, J. Burnett, A. A. Adamyan, A. Y. Tzalenchuk, S. E. Kubatkin, T. Lindstr¨ om, and A. V. Danilov, Suppression of low-frequency charge noise in superconducting resonators by surface spin des- orption, Nature Communications 9, 1143 (2018)

    2018

  105. [114]

    Sza´ nkowski, G

    P. Sza´ nkowski, G. Ramon, J. Krzywda, D. Kwiatkowski, and L. Cywi´ nski, Environmental noise spectroscopy with qubits subjected to dynamical decoupling, Jour- nal of Physics: Condensed Matter 29, 333001 (2017)

    2017

  106. [115]

    Y. M. Galperin, B. L. Altshuler, J. Bergli, and D. V. Shantsev, Non-Gaussian Low-Frequency Noise as a Source of Qubit Decoherence, Physical Review Letters 96, 097009 (2006)

    2006

  107. [116]

    Bergli, Y

    J. Bergli, Y. M. Galperin, and B. L. Altshuler, Decoher- ence in qubits due to low-frequency noise, New Journal of Physics 11, 025002 (2009)

    2009

  108. [117]

    Y. M. Galperin, B. L. Altshuler, and D. V. Shantsev, Low-Frequency Noise as a Source of Dephasing of a Qubit, in Fundamental Problems of Mesoscopic Physics: Interactions and Decoherence, edited by I. V. Lerner, B. L. Altshuler, and Y. Gefen (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 20...

    2004

  109. [118]

    Faoro and L

    L. Faoro and L. B. Ioffe, Interacting tunneling model for two-level systems in amorphous materials and its predictions for their dephasing and noise in supercon- ducting microresonators, Physical Review B 91, 014201 (2015)

    2015

  110. [119]

    Paladino, Y

    E. Paladino, Y. M. Galperin, G. Falci, and B. L. Alt- shuler, 1 / f noise: Implications for solid-state quantum information, Reviews of Modern Physics 86, 361 (2014)

    2014

  111. [120]

    G. J. Grabovskij, T. Peichl, J. Lisenfeld, G. Weiss, and A. V. Ustinov, Strain Tuning of Individual Atomic Tun- neling Systems Detected by a Superconducting Qubit, Science 338, 232 (2012)

    2012

  112. [2014]

    1st ed., pp. 113–256

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.