Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 48 references

Anomalies and D-branes in the Dabholkar-Park background

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The stable D-brane spectrum of the Dabholkar-Park orientifold, including its Z2 charges and four-fold periodicity, follows from world-sheet anomaly analysis with boundary Majorana fermions.

desk verdict A detailed and promising world-sheet derivation of KR-theory D-brane classifications in the DP background, but the four-unit anomaly shift that produces the four-fold periodicity is asserted rather than proved. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.08056 v2 pith:GZMWCD6U submitted 2024-12-11 hep-th

Hiroki Wada , Satoshi Yamaguchi This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords Dabholkar-ParkbackgroundorientifoldD-branesrelativeKR-theoryworld-sheetanomalyMajoranafermionsboundarystatesBottperiodicity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Stable D-branes in the nine-dimensional Dabholkar-Park orientifold—type IIB on a circle with world-sheet parity combined with a half-shift—are classified by relative KR-theory groups that repeat with period four. This paper tries to establish that this classification, including the Z2-valued groups and the halved periodicity, is a consequence of world-sheet anomalies rather than an input. Fermionic zero-modes give a Z8 anomaly as in type I theory, while the half-shift adds a bosonic topological term that makes the anomaly coefficient freely shiftable by four units. The paper constructs the corresponding D-brane states and shows that their charges and stability exactly match the relative KR-theory table.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the boundary anomaly counting of one-dimensional Majorana fermions. On a world-sheet with a boundary corresponding to a Dp-brane, the time-reversal and fermion-number anomalies of the world-sheet fermions are those of $(9-p)$ Majorana fermions and are classified by Z8; one cancels them by coupling the right number of boundary Majorana fermions, with at most four needed when a symplectic Chan-Paton factor is used. The new ingredient for the DP background is the bosonic topological term $\int w_1(\Sigma)^2$, generated by the mixed anomaly between the momentum Z2 symmetry (the half-shift) and the winding symmetry. This term is not physical, so it can be added or removed freely; it shifts the anomaly by four units and thereby maps the 8-fold periodicity familiar from type I theory to the 4-fold periodicity of relative KR-theory. Stability is then read from whether a tachyon vertex operator built from the boundary fermions and the Kaluza-Klein momentum survives the projections.

What would settle it

Compute the anomaly class on a world-sheet with two boundaries while treating the winding transformation as a genuine global symmetry: if the partition function changes by a phase that cannot be absorbed by a local counterterm, the $\int w_1^2$ term is physical and the claimed four-unit shift fails. Alternatively, look for a stable wrapped D6-brane, since the argument predicts that no such brane is stable for any radius because a Wilson line always produces a tachyon.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the nature—including stability and charge quantization—of D-branes in the DP background can be extracted from a one-dimensional Majorana-fermion system on the world-sheet boundary, after taking the GSO projection and orientifold into account. In the absence of a D-brane, gauging is anomaly-free on closed surfaces, but a boundary can carry a Z8-valued anomaly; the Dp-brane is formulated by adding boundary Majorana fermions, and sometimes a symplectic Chan-Paton factor, to cancel it. On top of this fermionic anomaly, the paper identifies a new bosonic contribution: the half-shift is a Z2 momentum symmetry, and the mixed momentum-winding anomaly produces the topological term $\int w_1^2$ on the world-sheet, where $w_1$ is the first Stiefel-Whitney class. Because this term is non-physical, the Z8 anomaly can be freely shifted by four units, reducing the periodicity of the charge lattice from eight to four. The paper constructs the resulting D-brane states and verifies that their charges and stability exactly reproduce the relative KR-theory table, including the integer groups for D8, D5, D4, D1, and D0 and the Z2 groups for D7, D3, and D(-1).

Load-bearing premise

The argument stands on the claim that the topological term $\int w_1^2$ is non-physical, so the Z8 anomaly can be shifted by four units; if that shift cannot be implemented as a symmetry of the full world-sheet theory with D-brane boundaries, the periodicity would remain eight and the KR table would not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The relative KR-theory classification of DP D-branes is reproduced directly from world-sheet anomaly data, without inserting the K-theory answer by hand.
  • The four-fold periodicity of stable D-brane charges in the DP background is traced to the non-physical shift $\int w_1^2$ coming from the half-shift.
  • Wrapped D7- and D3-branes are stable only on one side of the radius $R = \sqrt{2\alpha'}$, and the stability of wrapped versus unwrapped branes switches with the radius.
  • The boundary-state construction gives explicit representatives for the generators of the KR groups, including the integer-charge wrapped D4 and D8 branes and the Z2-charged D7 and D3 branes.
  • The anomaly analysis is consistent with the known T-dual picture in which the DP background is described by an O8- plane and an O8+ plane.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the shift-by-four mechanism is correct, any string orientifold whose discrete torsion is tied to a momentum Z2 gauge field may show a halved Bott periodicity; testing other half-shift orientifolds would show how general the mechanism is.
  • The equivalence between the symplectic and shifted-orthogonal descriptions of the wrapped D4-brane suggests a general dictionary in which shifting by the $\int w_1^2$ term swaps symplectic and orthogonal Chan-Paton factors; this could be tested by comparing cylinder and Mobius amplitudes with the term included.
  • The radius threshold $R = \sqrt{2\alpha'}$ appears from the mass formula for tachyon vertex operators, so it should be visible as a genuine decay or stability transition in the open-string spectrum; computing the full one-loop amplitude away from the threshold would be a sharper check.
  • The paper's state construction gives evidence that tachyon condensation realizes exactly the equivalence relation of relative KR-theory, but a general proof that all KR equivalences are realized by such condensations remains open.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. This paper analyzes stable D-branes in the nine-dimensional Dabholkar-Park (DP) orientifold, defined as the quotient of type IIB on a circle by the world-sheet parity combined with a half-shift. The authors propose that the classification of stable D-branes by relative KR-theory, including its 4-fold periodicity, follows from world-sheet anomaly considerations: world-sheet fermions give a Z8 anomaly, and a bosonic topological term ∫w1^2, claimed to be non-physical in the DP background, shifts this anomaly by four units. They support this with an analysis of boundary Majorana fermions and tachyon vertex operators for wrapped and unwrapped branes, and they construct explicit boundary states and compute cylinder and Möbius amplitudes to check stability. The paper concludes that the constructed D-brane states reproduce the known relative KR-theory table.

Significance. If the central shift argument is valid, the paper provides a genuinely physical, world-sheet explanation for the 4-fold periodicity of the relative KR groups in the DP background, going beyond the existing K-theory computation and the T-dual O8± picture. The explicit boundary-state construction, the systematic anomaly counting with boundary Majorana fermions, and the radius-dependent stability predictions are valuable and clearly within the scope of the journal. The paper is also transparent about using the known KR table as a check rather than an input. However, the key step that converts the Z8 anomaly into a Z4 anomaly is asserted rather than rigorously justified, and one of the stability claims for the wrapped D3-brane appears inconsistent with the paper's own mass formula. These issues affect the central claim and need to be addressed before the paper can be recommended for publication.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.3, D3 paragraph, and Eq. (3.7)] The claim that 'the Z8-valued anomaly can be freely shifted by four units' is the load-bearing step that turns the 8-fold KO-type periodicity into the 4-fold relative KR periodicity of Table 1, but it is not demonstrated. The anomalous winding transformation that generates the shift is a symmetry of the closed-string compact boson only in the absence of boundaries; on the open-string world-sheet the winding number is not conserved, so the transformation is not obviously a symmetry of the boundary sector that defines the D-brane. Moreover, the same term ∫Σ w1^2 is described in the preceding paragraph as the discrete torsion distinguishing O9± in the type I theory, i.e. as a physical parameter; the manuscript does not explain why the identification A_p = w1 in the DP background changes its status to a redundant counterterm. Without an argument that the half-shift makes this term a coboundary, or an explicit construction of the shift acting on boundary conditions, the reduction from 8-fold to 4-fold periodicity does not follow from the anomaly calculation. The analogy with the QCD theta term is suggestive but needs to be made precise in the presence of world-sheet boundaries.
  2. [Section 4.3, Eqs. (4.28)–(4.31)] The stability conclusion for the wrapped D3-brane is internally inconsistent with the paper's own mass formula. The vertex operator (3.6) has mass squared M^2 = (1/R)^2 - 1/(2α') by Eq. (3.7), so it is tachyonic for R > √2α' and non-tachyonic for R < √2α'. The D7 paragraph correctly states that the wrapped D7-brane is unstable for R > √2α' and stable for R < √2α'. The D3 paragraph, after saying that the situation is 'completely the same as the wrapped D7-brane', states the opposite: unstable for R < √2α' and stable for R > √2α'. This is a direct contradiction and must be corrected; it also affects the claimed representative of KR(S^5 × S^1, S^1) ≃ Z2 and the comparison with Table 1.
  3. [Section 3.2, Eq. (3.5)] The boundary-state check that the wrapped D3-brane is stable for R < √2α' relies on flipping the sign of the Möbius amplitude by 'freely adding' the topological term (3.5); this is the same unproven step as in Section 3.2. The normalization λ_p is treated as a free parameter and fixed by requiring cancellation of the even-KK divergence, but the physical interpretation of this cancellation procedure, and why it selects D3 rather than D1 or D2, is not explained beyond the earlier vertex-operator analysis. The authors should clarify whether the boundary-state computation is an independent check or a restatement of the Section 3.3 stability argument.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Introduction, around Eq. (1.1)] The formatting of Table 1 in the introduction is difficult to read; the KR group entries should be clearly aligned with the Dp labels, and the caption should specify the convention for wrapped versus unwrapped branes.
  2. [Section 3.2, first paragraph] The sentence 'the D4-brane and D8 wrapping along the circle in 10d are stable' is ambiguous: it should say explicitly whether these are the wrapped D4-brane and the wrapped D8-brane (i.e. the D7-brane in the nine-dimensional sense), since the distinction is central to the later stability analysis.
  3. [Section 4.2, Eq. (4.22)] The statement that 'the half-shift g generates the Z2 subgroup of the U(1) momentum symmetry' would be clearer if the action on X9 and on the KK momentum eigenstates were stated explicitly in the main text rather than only in Section 2.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The 4-fold periodicity is carried by the asserted 'freely shifted by four units' move, verified by the target KR table itself; the per-brane choice of shifted versus unshifted description in §3.3 tracks the known classification, while the §4 boundary-state amplitudes give independent support.

  1. other [Section 3.2, paragraph following Eq. (3.5)]
    "On the other hand, in the DP background, the Z8-valued anomaly can be freely shifted by four units, since the topological term (3.5) is not physical. As the result, the periodicity of the corresponding K-theory reduces to four, as can be observed in Table 1."

    The paper's central claimed derivation is the reduction of the D-brane classification to 4-fold periodicity; that conclusion is here the immediate transcription of the assertion that the Z8 anomaly 'can be freely shifted by four units.' The only justification offered is an analogy to the QCD theta term, and the stated evidence is the target itself ('as can be observed in Table 1'), i.e., the known relative KR-theory table from Ref. [26] that the paper aims to derive. Two paragraphs earlier the same topological term (3.5) is identified as the physical discrete torsion distinguishing O9± theories (KO versus KSp), so its 'not physical' status in the DP background is exactly the premise that carries the conclusion, not an independently established fact.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Section 3.3, 'D3-branes' paragraph]
    "Since there are tachyon vertex operators χ_i V_tach, the wrapped D3-brane in this description is unstable. After shifting the anomaly by 4 units, the single Majorana fermion λ, that is even under T, is relevant for coupling to the boundary. Then, the situation is completely the same as the wrapped D7-brane."

    The unshifted, minimal description of the wrapped D3 (three T-odd Majorana fermions) renders it unstable and hence would predict a trivial class, contradicting the target group KR(R^5×S^1,S^1) ≃ Z2. The paper then applies the §3.2 shift-by-four and obtains the desired entry by declaring the situation 'completely the same as the wrapped D7-brane,' i.e., by copying the D7 analysis rather than resolving the disagreement between the two descriptions. Conversely, for D5/D6/D7 no shift is applied and for D2/D1 both descriptions are used; the per-brane choice tracks Table 1 entry by entry. Since the two descriptions are claimed to be physically equivalent yet give differing D3 stability, the Z2 'prediction' is forced by the description choice rather than derived from the anomaly calculation.

full rationale

No self-citation is load-bearing: the premises (Z8 anomaly classification [21], the w1^2 invertible phase and its cancellation by four boundary Majorana fermions [16,17], the DP orientifold [25], the relative KR table [26]) are all external prior work and count as genuine independent support, so the self-citation patterns do not apply. The fermionic anomaly analysis of §3.1 and the boundary-state computations of §4 (cylinder and Mobius amplitudes, Wilson-loop mass shifts, the stack-of-two D4 orthogonal/symplectic equivalence) are self-contained and independently confirm many entries, so the paper is not a pure renaming of Ref. [26]. The circular burden is concentrated in §3.2: the reduction from 8-fold to 4-fold periodicity is the assertion that the anomaly is 'freely shifted by four units,' whose only cited evidence is the target Table 1, and whose per-case deployment in §3.3 (shift for D3 and D4, no shift for D7 and D5) is guided by the known classification; the wrapped D3 case shows the two descriptions disagree on stability, which would be impossible if the shift were a genuine redundancy of the theory. A separate correctness concern, not counted as circularity, is that §3.3's radius statement for the wrapped D3 ('unstable for R < sqrt(2)alpha-prime') conflicts with its own mass formula (3.7) and with §4.3 ('only the D3-brane is actually stable for R < sqrt(2)alpha-prime'). Score 6 reflects partial circularity: the headline periodicity argument reduces by construction, while substantial independent amplitude computations and the D4 stack equivalence remain.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central derivation relies on no empirically fitted parameters; the boundary state normalization λ_p is fixed by demanding divergence cancellation. The main assumptions are the KR classification target from [26], the Z8 anomaly cancellation framework from [21,18], and the new claim that the bosonic topological term is non-physical and shifts the anomaly by four units. No new spacetime entities are introduced; the boundary Majorana fermions are auxiliary fields required by anomaly cancellation.

free parameters (1)
  • λ_p (boundary state normalization for non-BPS wrapped branes) = -sin(π p/4) for p=5,6,7 in the default sign, and the opposite sign in the shifted description
    Chosen in Eqs. (4.30)-(4.31) to cancel the even-KK-momentum divergence in the cylinder plus Möbius amplitude. Not fitted to data, but hand-tuned for consistency of the construction.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Stable D-brane charges in the DP background are classified by relative KR-theory KR(R^{8-p} × S^1, S^1) as computed in [26].
    The paper uses the KR table (Table 1) as the target classification and does not re-derive it from K-theory; the anomaly analysis aims to reproduce it.
  • domain assumption World-sheet anomalies from fermions in the presence of D-branes are classified by Z8 and can be canceled by boundary Majorana fermions, following Fidkowski-Kitaev [21] and Witten [18].
    Section 3.1 invokes this classification to assign Majorana fermions to each Dp-brane.
  • domain assumption The compact-boson momentum and winding symmetries have a mixed anomaly, and the orientifold identifies the momentum Z2 gauge field with w1(Σ), producing ∫w1^2; this term can be shifted by an anomalous winding transformation and is therefore non-physical.
    Section 3.2 uses this to argue the Z8 anomaly can be shifted by four units; this is the key new step and is not fully proven.
  • domain assumption The boundary state formalism with the specified normalization factors reproduces the cylinder and Möbius amplitudes.
    Section 4 uses standard boundary and crosscap state conventions from [44,45,17].
  • domain assumption Stability of a D-brane is equivalent to absence of a surviving tachyon vertex operator, and Z2 charge groups follow from the inability to distinguish brane and antibrane.
    Sections 3.3 and 4.2 apply this criterion, following [18].
invented entities (1)
  • Boundary 1d Majorana fermions (λ_i and χ_i) on the world-sheet boundary
    purpose: Cancel anomalies of world-sheet fermion number and time-reversal symmetry so that GSO and orientifold projections are consistent in the presence of D-branes.
    They are auxiliary world-sheet degrees of freedom, not spacetime fields; their existence is inferred from the anomaly cancellation requirement rather than from an independent observable. This is standard in the method of [18].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Anomalies and D-branes in the Dabholkar-Park background." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GZMWCD6U

@misc{pith2026241208056,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Anomalies and D-branes in the Dabholkar-Park background},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GZMWCD6U}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.08056}
}
abstract

We consider D-branes in the Dabholkar-Park (DP) background, a $9$d orientifold theory obtained by gauging symmetry in the type IIB string theory compactified on a circle. Using anomalies in the world-sheet theory, we provide physical insights into the classification of stable D-branes by relative KR-theory. The nature, such as stability, of D-branes wrapping along the compactified circle can be extracted from information about $1$d Majorana fermions on the boundary of the world-sheet. These Majorana fermions need to be introduced to consistently perform the GSO projection and the orientifold. We also construct D-brane states in the DP background. The spectrum of D-branes characterized by the relative KR-theory is correctly reproduced from the D-brane states.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Dirichlet Branes and Ramond-Ramond cha rges,

    J. Polchinski, “Dirichlet Branes and Ramond-Ramond cha rges,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (1995) 4724–4727 , arXiv:hep-th/9510017

    arXiv 1995

  2. [2]

    Polchinski, String theory

    J. Polchinski, String theory. Vol. 2: Superstring theory and beyond . Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 12, 200 7. 20

    work page

  3. [3]

    C. V . Johnson, D-Branes. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. 2023

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    String theory dynamics in various dimension s,

    E. Witten, “String theory dynamics in various dimension s,” Nucl. Phys. B 443 (1995) 85–126 , arXiv:hep-th/9503124

    arXiv 1995

  5. [5]

    Evidence for heterotic - ty pe I string duality,

    J. Polchinski and E. Witten, “Evidence for heterotic - ty pe I string duality,” Nucl. Phys. B 460 (1996) 525–540 , arXiv:hep-th/9510169

    arXiv 1996

  6. [6]

    Heterotic and Type I string dyna mics from eleven dimensions,

    P. Horava and E. Witten, “Heterotic and Type I string dyna mics from eleven dimensions,” Nucl. Phys. B 460 (1996) 506–524 , arXiv:hep-th/9510209

    arXiv 1996

  7. [7]

    Eleven-dimensional supergrav ity on a manifold with boundary,

    P. Horava and E. Witten, “Eleven-dimensional supergrav ity on a manifold with boundary,” Nucl. Phys. B 475 (1996) 94–114 , arXiv:hep-th/9603142

    arXiv 1996

  8. [8]

    Stable nonBPS states in string theory,

    A. Sen, “Stable nonBPS states in string theory,” JHEP 06 (1998) 007, arXiv:hep-th/9803194

    arXiv 1998

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    Stable nonBPS bound states of BPS D-branes,

    A. Sen, “Stable nonBPS bound states of BPS D-branes,” JHEP 08 (1998) 010, arXiv:hep-th/9805019

    1998 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Tachyon condensation on the brane anti-brane s ystem,

    A. Sen, “Tachyon condensation on the brane anti-brane s ystem,” JHEP 08 (1998) 012, arXiv:hep-th/9805170

    1998 arXiv

  3. [11]

    SO(32) spinors of type I and other solitons on br ane - anti-brane pair,

    A. Sen, “SO(32) spinors of type I and other solitons on br ane - anti-brane pair,” JHEP 09 (1998) 023, arXiv:hep-th/9808141

    1998 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Type I D particle and its interactions,

    A. Sen, “Type I D particle and its interactions,” JHEP 10 (1998) 021, arXiv:hep-th/9809111

    1998 arXiv

  5. [13]

    BPS D-branes on nonsupersymmetric cycles,

    A. Sen, “BPS D-branes on nonsupersymmetric cycles,” JHEP 12 (1998) 021, arXiv:hep-th/9812031

    1998 arXiv

  6. [14]

    D-branes and K-theory,

    E. Witten, “D-branes and K-theory,” JHEP 12 (1998) 019, arXiv:hep-th/9810188

    1998 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Type IIA D-branes, K theory, and matrix theo ry,

    P. Horava, “Type IIA D-branes, K theory, and matrix theo ry,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1999) 1373–1404 , arXiv:hep-th/9812135

    1999 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Classi fication of String Theories via Topological Phases,

    J. Kaidi, J. Parra-Martinez, and Y . Tachikawa, “Classi fication of String Theories via Topological Phases,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 no. 12, (2020) 121601 , arXiv:1908.04805 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Topolo gical Superconductors on Superstring Worldsheets,

    J. Kaidi, J. Parra-Martinez, and Y . Tachikawa, “Topolo gical Superconductors on Superstring Worldsheets,” SciPost Phys. 9 (2020) 10, arXiv:1911.11780 [hep-th] . with a mathematical appendix by A. Debray

    2020 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Anomalies and Nonsupersymmetric D-Branes ,

    E. Witten, “Anomalies and Nonsupersymmetric D-Branes ,” arXiv:2305.01012 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  11. [19]

    Spin Structures in String The ory,

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten, “Spin Structures in String The ory,” Nucl. Phys. B 276 (1986) 272

    1986

  12. [20]

    An O(16) x O(16) Heterotic String,

    L. Alvarez-Gaume, P. H. Ginsparg, G. W . Moore, and C. Vaf a, “An O(16) x O(16) Heterotic String,” Phys. Lett. B 171 (1986) 155–162 . 21

    1986

  13. [21]

    The effects of interactions on the topological classification of free fermion systems,

    L. Fidkowski and A. Kitaev, “The effects of interactions on the topological classification of free fermion systems,” Phys. Rev. B 81 (2010) 134509, arXiv:0904.2197 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2010 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Tachyon condensation in unstable type I D- brane systems,

    O. Bergman, “Tachyon condensation in unstable type I D- brane systems,” JHEP 11 (2000) 015, arXiv:hep-th/0009252

    2000 arXiv

  15. [23]

    D branes and KK theory in type 1 string theory,

    T. Asakawa, S. Sugimoto, and S. Terashima, “D branes and KK theory in type 1 string theory,” JHEP 05 (2002) 007, arXiv:hep-th/0202165

    2002 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Exact descr iption of D branes via tachyon condensation,

    T. Asakawa, S. Sugimoto, and S. Terashima, “Exact descr iption of D branes via tachyon condensation,” JHEP 02 (2003) 011, arXiv:hep-th/0212188

    2003 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Strings on orientifolds,

    A. Dabholkar and J. Park, “Strings on orientifolds,” Nucl. Phys. B 477 (1996) 701–714 , arXiv:hep-th/9604178

    1996 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Brane transfer o perations and T duality of nonBPS states,

    O. Bergman, E. G. Gimon, and P. Horava, “Brane transfer o perations and T duality of nonBPS states,” JHEP 04 (1999) 010, arXiv:hep-th/9902160

    1999 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Toroidal compactification without vector s tructure,

    E. Witten, “Toroidal compactification without vector s tructure,” JHEP 02 (1998) 006, arXiv:hep-th/9712028

    1998 arXiv

  20. [28]

    NonBPS D branes and M theory,

    M. R. Gaberdiel and S. Schafer-Nameki, “NonBPS D branes and M theory,” JHEP 09 (2001) 028, arXiv:hep-th/0108202

    2001 arXiv

  21. [29]

    NonBPS D-branes and enhanced symmetry in an asymmetric orbifold,

    M. Gutperle, “NonBPS D-branes and enhanced symmetry in an asymmetric orbifold,” JHEP 08 (2000) 036, arXiv:hep-th/0007126

    2000 arXiv

  22. [30]

    The Moduli sp ace and M(atrix) theory of 9d N=1 backgrounds of M/string theory,

    O. Aharony, Z. Komargodski, and A. Patir, “The Moduli sp ace and M(atrix) theory of 9d N=1 backgrounds of M/string theory,” JHEP 05 (2007) 073, arXiv:hep-th/0702195

    2007 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Semi-Flatland,

    D. Vegh and J. McGreevy, “Semi-Flatland,” JHEP 10 (2008) 068, arXiv:0808.1569 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Classica l de Sitter Solutions of 10-Dimensional Supergravity,

    C. C´ ordova, G. B. De Luca, and A. Tomasiello, “Classica l de Sitter Solutions of 10-Dimensional Supergravity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 no. 9, (2019) 091601 , arXiv:1812.04147 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Four-dimensiona l N = 4 SYM theory and the swampland,

    H.-C. Kim, H.-C. Tarazi, and C. Vafa, “Four-dimensiona l N = 4 SYM theory and the swampland,” Phys. Rev. D 102 no. 2, (2020) 026003 , arXiv:1912.06144 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Cobordism Conjecture, Anomali es, and the String Lamppost Principle,

    M. Montero and C. Vafa, “Cobordism Conjecture, Anomali es, and the String Lamppost Principle,” JHEP 01 (2021) 063, arXiv:2008.11729 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Oh, wa it, O8 de Sitter may be unstable!,

    I. Bena, G. B. De Luca, M. Gra˜ na, and G. Lo Monaco, “Oh, wa it, O8 de Sitter may be unstable!,” JHEP 03 (2021) 168, arXiv:2010.05936 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  28. [36]

    8d supergravity, reconstructio n of internal geometry and the Swampland,

    Y . Hamada and C. Vafa, “8d supergravity, reconstructio n of internal geometry and the Swampland,” JHEP 06 (2021) 178, arXiv:2104.05724 [hep-th] . 22

    2021 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Compact ness of brane moduli and the String Lamppost Principle in d > 6,

    A. Bedroya, Y . Hamada, M. Montero, and C. Vafa, “Compact ness of brane moduli and the String Lamppost Principle in d > 6,” JHEP 02 (2022) 082, arXiv:2110.10157 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  30. [38]

    New supersymmetric string moduli spaces from frozen singularities,

    H. Parra De Freitas, “New supersymmetric string moduli spaces from frozen singularities,” JHEP 01 (2023) 170, arXiv:2209.03451 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  31. [39]

    New supersymmetric string theories from discrete theta angles,

    M. Montero and H. Parra de Freitas, “New supersymmetric string theories from discrete theta angles,” JHEP 01 (2023) 091, arXiv:2209.03361 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  32. [40]

    II B string theory explored: Reflection 7-branes,

    M. Dierigl, J. J. Heckman, M. Montero, and E. Torres, “II B string theory explored: Reflection 7-branes,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 8, (2023) 086015 , arXiv:2212.05077 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Running decompactification, sliding towers, and the distance conje cture,

    M. Etheredge, B. Heidenreich, J. McNamara, T. Rudelius , I. Ruiz, and I. Valenzuela, “Running decompactification, sliding towers, and the distance conje cture,” JHEP 12 (2023) 182, arXiv:2306.16440 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  34. [42]

    T wisted Orien tifold planes and S-duality without supersymmetry,

    G. Bossard, G. Casagrande, and E. Dudas, “T wisted Orien tifold planes and S-duality without supersymmetry,” arXiv:2411.00955 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  35. [43]

    Hatcher, Algebraic Topology

    A. Hatcher, Algebraic Topology. Cambridge University Press, 2002. https://pi.math.cornell.edu/˜ hatcher/AT/ATpage.html

    2002

  36. [44]

    Consistency of Open Superstr ing Theories,

    J. Polchinski and Y . Cai, “Consistency of Open Superstr ing Theories,” Nucl. Phys. B 296 (1988) 91–128

    1988

  37. [45]

    Loop Corrections to Superstring Equations of Motion,

    C. G. Callan, Jr., C. Lovelace, C. R. Nappi, and S. A. Y ost , “Loop Corrections to Superstring Equations of Motion,” Nucl. Phys. B 308 (1988) 221–284

    1988

  38. [46]

    Lectures on nonBPS Dirichlet branes,

    M. R. Gaberdiel, “Lectures on nonBPS Dirichlet branes, ” Class. Quant. Grav. 17 (2000) 3483–3520 , arXiv:hep-th/0005029

    2000 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Stable n onBPS D-branes in type I string theory,

    M. Frau, L. Gallot, A. Lerda, and P. Strigazzi, “Stable n onBPS D-branes in type I string theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 564 (2000) 60–85 , arXiv:hep-th/9903123

    2000 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Consistency conditions for orientifolds and D-manifolds,

    E. G. Gimon and J. Polchinski, “Consistency conditions for orientifolds and D-manifolds,” Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 1667–1676 , arXiv:hep-th/9601038. 23

    1996 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.