Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 32 references

Ultrafast valleytronic logic operations

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Phase-locked linear pulse pairs can write, switch, and amplify valley polarization in monolayer WS2 at room temperature.

desk verdict A clean experimental demonstration of the two-pulse valley switch with a genuinely new four-pulse protocol, but the quantitative claims need more support because the model is fit to the same data it validates and the TRFR signal is assumed to measure population imbalance without calibration. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.08318 v1 pith:XEN3RNDX submitted 2024-12-11 cond-mat.mes-hall

Francesco Gucci , Eduardo B. Molinero , Mattia Russo , Pablo San-Jose , Franco V. A. Camargo , Margherita Maiuri , Misha Ivanov , Álvaro Jiménez-Galán
show 3 more authors
Rui E. F. Silva Stefano Dal Conte Giulio Cerullo
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall PACS 78.47.J78.67.-n71.35.-y
keywords valleytronicstransitionmetaldichalcogenidesexcitonvalleycoherencecoherentcontroltime-resolvedFaradayrotationultrafastopticalswitchingLindbladmasterequationmonolayerWS2
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that the valley degree of freedom in a two-dimensional semiconductor can be operated as an ultrafast, all-optical logic variable at room temperature. Its central claim is that two phase-locked, orthogonally polarized few-cycle pulses, timed with sub-optical-cycle precision, behave like a single circularly polarized pulse and write a valley-selective population whose sign is set by the delay. A four-pulse version of the same idea is then claimed to switch this valley polarization off and re-excite or amplify it, in less than 100 fs and at rates near 10 THz. A sympathetic reader would care because this targets the two standing obstacles to valleytronics: all-optical initialization and cascaded logic operations at speeds beyond conventional transistors. The evidence is time-resolved Faraday rotation on monolayer WS2, reproduced by a three-level Lindblad model with two decoherence rates fitted from the same two-pulse data.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is an effective circularly polarized pulse assembled from two phase-locked perpendicular linear pulses. The delay $t_{12}$ governs the rotation of the exciton pseudospin on the Bloch sphere: when $t_{12}\omega_f = \pm\pi/2 + 2\pi N$, the pair is equivalent to $\sigma^+$ or $\sigma^-$ light, and the induced valley polarization scales as $\sim 4\alpha^2 \sin(\omega_f t_{12}) e^{-t_{12}/T_2}$. The simulations use a three-level V-type Lindblad master equation (a ground state plus degenerate $|K\rangle$ and $|K'\rangle$ excitons), with intervalley scattering rate $\gamma_V = 1/(2\tau)$ and pure dephasing rate $\gamma_D = 1/T_2^*$, both obtained by fitting the two-pulse traces and then applied without additional parameters to the four-pulse protocol. In that protocol the constraint $t_{12}=t_{34}$ makes the third pulse act as a $\pi$-complement of the first and the fourth as a $\pi$-complement of the second, producing either coherent switch-off or coherent re-excitation and amplification.

What would settle it

Measure the four-pulse TRFR traces at several probe photon energies or at low temperature and test whether the switch-off time, the residual polarization after the fourth pulse, and the amplification factor are all reproduced by the three-level model with the same two fitted rates. Any systematic drift of $\tau$ or $T_2^*$ with probe energy, or a fluence dependence of the switch-off-to-amplification ratio below the stated linearity threshold, would indicate an additional decoherence channel and break the coherent-control interpretation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that two weak, phase-locked, linearly polarized pulses with orthogonal polarizations, separated by a controlled sub-optical-cycle delay, act on the K and K′ excitons of monolayer WS2 like a single circularly polarized pulse. When the delay satisfies $t_{12}\omega_f = \pm\pi/2 + 2\pi N$, the pair selects one valley, and the sign of the selection flips with a delay change of about one femtosecond. Because the effect persists after the pulses no longer overlap, it is coherent control of the exciton pseudospin rather than field superposition. Adding a second phase-locked pair allows the initialized valley polarization to be switched off in about 50 fs or amplified by about 50 percent before intervalley scattering and dephasing restore or cap it. The paper reports room-temperature valley operations at rates above 10 THz and extraction of the valley relaxation time $\tau \approx 75$ fs and the pure dephasing time $T_2^* \approx 34$ fs from the two-pulse traces.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the measured Faraday rotation directly reflects the K/K′ population imbalance, and that a three-level Lindblad model with only intervalley scattering and pure dephasing, with both rates fitted from the two-pulse data, describes all dynamics needed for the four-pulse switching and amplification.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Room-temperature all-optical initialization of valley polarization can be done with weak, phase-locked linear pulses, without circular polarizers or strong terahertz fields.
  • Rotating the delay between the two pulses by about one femtosecond flips the initialized valley, providing a binary valley switch that operates in under 100 fs and at rates above 10 THz.
  • A four-pulse sequence performs two cascaded operations on one valley pseudospin, coherent switching and amplification, which is a step toward cascaded valleytronic logic.
  • The two-pulse delay scan yields the intervalley scattering time $\tau \approx 75$ fs and the pure dephasing time $T_2^* \approx 34$ fs independently from the same measurement, quantities that set the speed limit for valley devices.
  • The protocol is transferable to any inversion-asymmetric hexagonal 2D semiconductor with the same optical valley selection rules, and attosecond pulse trains could push switching toward PHz rates.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the Faraday signal truly tracks the valley population, the same effective-circular-pulse idea could be compressed into a single spectrally shaped pulse whose phase pattern encodes the $\pm\pi/2$ delay relation, removing the second pulse from a future device.
  • The fitted $\tau \approx 75$ fs is attributed in the paper to short-range exchange scattering; repeating the two-pulse scan on encapsulated samples or at lower temperature would test whether the switch-off contrast improves as this relaxation channel is suppressed.
  • The four-pulse restoration after switch-off is a sensitive readout of decoherence during the roughly 60 fs between pulse pairs; comparing it with the three-level prediction at other delays could expose additional channels such as trion formation or exciton-exciton scattering.
  • Because the pair's valley selectivity depends on surviving excitonic coherence, the same protocol is a direct all-optical clock of electronic dephasing, with $T_2$ read from the envelope of the $t_{12}$ scan rather than from a separate measurement.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports an experimental and theoretical study of ultrafast valley control in monolayer WS2 at room temperature. Using a pair of phase-locked, orthogonally polarized few-cycle pulses generated by a TWINS interferometer, the authors show that the valley polarization can be selectively initialized in K or K' depending on the inter-pulse delay. They then use a four-pulse protocol to demonstrate coherent switching and amplification of the valley polarization, with operations claimed to occur at rates as high as ~10 THz. The experimental observable is time-resolved Faraday rotation (TRFR), and the results are interpreted with a three-level Lindblad model whose parameters (τ, T2*, ℏωf) are fitted to the two-pulse data. The central claims are that the two-pulse protocol induces a valley-selective population and that the four-pulse protocol implements logic operations.

Significance. If the interpretation is correct, the work represents a notable step toward all-optical valleytronic logic at room temperature, with switching times below 100 fs. The experimental effort is substantial: the TWINS setup provides sub-attosecond delay control, the pulse duration is characterized by FROG, and a linear-excitation threshold is established. The use of a simple three-level model to capture the essential dynamics is appealing, and the four-pulse demonstrations, if validated, would be of interest to the ultrafast spectroscopy and 2D materials communities. However, the significance is currently tempered by two issues: the uncalibrated identification of the TRFR signal with the valley population imbalance, and the fact that the model parameters are fitted to the same data used to 'validate' the model, making the four-pulse agreement a consistency check rather than an independent prediction. The absence of error bars further limits the quantitative strength of the claims.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods, 'Theoretical simulations', and Eq. (4)] The measured TRFR signal is equated to the valley population imbalance σ(t) of Eq. (4) without calibration or a control experiment. In a V-type exciton system, a linearly polarized probe can experience not only circular birefringence from the population imbalance but also linear birefringence/dichroism from the K–K′ coherence (the equatorial pseudospin components). The probe polarization is not specified relative to the pump axes, and the balanced detection scheme measures any rotation of the probe polarization. If the coherence contribution is non-negligible, the fitted values τ ≈ 75 fs and T2* ≈ 34 fs, and hence the four-pulse simulations in Figs. 3E and 3F, would not be established. The authors should either specify and justify the probe geometry, perform a control measurement with a different probe polarization (e.g., probe along the pump axes vs at 45°), or quantify the coherence contribution to the TRFR signal.
  2. [Methods, 'Theoretical simulations'] The model parameters τ, T2*, and ℏωf are fitted to the two-pulse TRFR data (Figs. 2B–D), and the same model is then used to simulate the four-pulse switching and amplification (Figs. 3E,F). This is a consistency check rather than a parameter-free prediction, and the agreement in the four-pulse case does not by itself validate the model. The authors should provide an independent determination of at least one of these timescales (e.g., from a separate technique such as four-wave mixing or from a sample with different conditions) or clearly identify a quantitative prediction of the model that is not used in the fit.
  3. [Figs. 2 and 3] The experimental data in Figs. 2 and 3 are shown without error bars. The '50% amplification' claim and the quantitative agreement of the simulations cannot be evaluated without an estimate of the measurement uncertainty. Please provide error bars (at least on representative points) or a discussion of the noise level and the reproducibility of the TRFR traces, so that the reader can judge the significance of the observed amplitudes and the quality of the model comparison.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Methods, 'Theoretical simulations'] The sentence 'Such maximum must should oscillate as' contains a grammatical error ('must should'); please revise.
  2. [Acknowledgments] The acknowledgments contain a duplicated phrase: 'G.C. acknowledges support by the acknowledge the Horizon Europe...' Please correct.
  3. [Conclusions and Abstract] The abstract mentions 'valley de-excitation and re-excitation', while the main text emphasizes 'switching off' and 'amplification'. Please align the terminology to avoid confusion about what operations are demonstrated.
  4. [Introduction, 'Results'] The claim 'rates as high as ~10 THz' is based on a switching time of ~50 fs (1/50 fs = 20 THz). Please clarify how the rate is defined (e.g., inverse of the switch-on/off time or the repetition of a full operation) so that the reader can reproduce the number.
  5. [Methods, 'Theoretical simulations', Eq. (2)] The notation in the light-matter coupling Hamiltonian is unusual: the term '|g⟩⟨K| + |g⟩⟨K′| , i|g⟩⟨K| − i|g⟩⟨K′|' would benefit from parentheses or a vector notation to clearly indicate the Cartesian components of the dipole operator.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: model parameters are fitted to two-pulse data and then applied to independent four-pulse data, which is cross-validation rather than a self-referential prediction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The two-pulse valley-selective population claim follows from the optical selection rules and the coherent-control argument in the main text (Eqs. 1–2 and the t12*omega_f = ±pi/2 condition), not from the fitted parameters. The three-level Lindblad model parameters (hbar*omega_f, tau, T2*) are explicitly fitted to the two-pulse TRFR data (Methods, 'Theoretical simulations'), and the same model is then used to simulate the four-pulse traces in Fig. 3E,F. This is a genuine cross-check on independent data, not a circular prediction, because the four-pulse traces were not used in the fit and the switching/amplification behavior is a consequence of the model dynamics rather than an input. The identification of TRFR with the valley population imbalance sigma(t) is a standard measurement assumption (citing refs. 19 and 24) and not a derivation step that reduces to its own input; any concern about uncalibrated linear-birefringence contamination is a correctness risk, not a circularity. One self-citation (ref. 15, by Silva, Ivanov, and Jiménez-Galán) is used for the coherent-rotation mechanism, but the present paper re-derives the mechanism in the same paragraph, so the citation is not load-bearing. No fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work. The four-pulse logic operations are supported by the experimental TRFR traces themselves, with simulations playing an explanatory role.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on a small set of fitted parameters and standard-but-non-trivial modeling assumptions. The model parameters (τ, T2*, ℏωf) are all fitted to the same two-pulse dataset, so the quantitative interpretation is not parameter-free. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Valley polarization decay time τ = ≈ 75 fs (75.16 fs)
    Fitted from the TRFR decay at t12 = 0.5 fs (Methods, Theoretical simulations). Used in the Lindblad model to describe intervalley scattering rate γV = 1/(2τ).
  • Pure dephasing time T2* = ≈ 34 fs (33.51 fs)
    Fitted from the t12 scan using σmax(t12) ∝ sin(ωf t12) e^{-t12/T2} (Eq. 9, Methods). Used in the Lindblad model for pure dephasing rate γD = 1/T2*.
  • Exciton frequency ℏωf = ≈ 1.98 eV
    Fitted from the oscillation period in the t12 scan. The paper notes the experimental absorption value is ≈ 2.01 eV, so the fitted value is consistent.
  • Excitation amplitude α and pulse intensity = Not quantified, set to match linear regime
    The simulation uses a Gaussian envelope with FWHM 20 fs and an intensity 'such that we are in the linear regime' (Methods). The overall signal scale is thus matched by hand.
  • Time-resolution convolution width = 24 fs FWHM
    A Gaussian convolution with 24 fs FWHM is applied to the theoretical results to mimic the finite temporal resolution, chosen to match the experimental cross-correlation.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The 3-level V-system model (ground state plus two degenerate exciton states at K and K') with optical selection rules (σ+ couples to K, σ- to K') accurately captures the relevant physics.
    Invoked in the Results and Methods to derive Eq. 2 and the dynamics. Standard for TMDs, but assumes no coupling to other exciton states or dark states.
  • domain assumption The Lindblad master equation with collapse operators for intervalley scattering (Eq. 6) and pure dephasing (Eq. 8) describes all relevant decoherence.
    Used to simulate both two-pulse and four-pulse dynamics. The choice of only these channels is an assumption; ground-state relaxation is explicitly neglected.
  • domain assumption The excitation is in the linear regime, so the field-induced signal is proportional to α² and higher-order effects are negligible.
    The paper characterizes a linear threshold of 30 µJ/cm² and keeps fluence below 10 µJ/cm² (Methods), supporting this assumption.
  • domain assumption The TRFR signal at the probe energy 2.03 eV is directly proportional to the valley population imbalance.
    This is the basis for interpreting the measured polarization rotation as a valley-selective population. The paper references prior work (refs 19, 24) for this relationship.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ultrafast valleytronic logic operations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XEN3RNDX

@misc{pith2026241208318,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ultrafast valleytronic logic operations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XEN3RNDX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.08318}
}
read the original abstract

Information processing currently reaches speeds as high as 800 GHz. However, the underlying transistor technology is quickly approaching its fundamental limits and further progress requires a disruptive approach. One such path is to manipulate quantum properties of solids, such as the valley degree of freedom, with ultrashort controlled lightwaves. Here we employ a sequence of few-optical-cycle visible pulses controlled with attosecond precision to excite and switch the valley pseudospin in a 2D semiconductor. We show that a pair of pulses separated in time with linear orthogonal polarizations can induce a valley-selective population. Additionally, exploiting a four-pump excitation protocol, we perform logic operations such as valley de-excitation and re-excitation at room temperature at rates as high as ~10 THz.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.08318 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. D) of the overall 3x3 density matrix [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Control of valley polarization with phase-locked orthogonally polarized pulses. Two-pulse time￾resolved Faraday rotation experiment. (A) Double pump pulse generation scheme and TRFR setup. (B) TRFR experimental results obtained by continuously varying the delay between the pump pulses (𝑡12) and keeping fixed the probe pulse delay. The purple line connects the experimental points and acts as a guide for the eye. The … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Coherent switch off and amplification of valley polarization. Four-pulse TRFR experiments and simulations. (A) Pulse sequence used for the experiments and simulations. (B, C and D) Theoretical simulation of the four-pulse experiment in different scenarios. Panel (B) shows the incoherent case. The solid lines in panels (C, D) represent the fully coherent scenario, where 𝑡23 is set to either switch off or amplify the … view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. M. Waldrop, The chips are down for Moore’s law. Nature News 530, 144 (2016)

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    Z. Ye, D. Sun, T. F. Heinz, Optical manipulation of valley pseudospin. Nature Physics 13, 26– 29 (2017)

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Langer, C

    F. Langer, C. P. Schmid, S. Schlauderer, M. Gmitra, J. Fabian, P. Nagler, C. Schüller, T. Korn, P. G. Hawkins, J. T. Steiner, U. Huttner, S. W. Koch, M. Kira, R. Huber, Lightwave valleytronics in a monolayer of tungsten diselenide. Nature 557, 76–80 (2018)

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Žutić, J

    I. Žutić, J. Fabian, S. D. Sarma, Spintronics: Fundamentals and applications. Reviews of Modern Physics 76, 323 (2004)

    work page 2004

  5. [5]

    J. R. Schaibley, H. Yu, G. Clark, P. Rivera, J. S. Ross, K. L. Seyler, W. Yao, X. Xu, Valleytronics in 2D materials. Nature Reviews Materials 1, 1–15 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    S. A. Vitale, D. Nezich, J. O. Varghese, P. Kim, N. Gedik, P. Jarillo-Herrero, D. Xiao, M. Rothschild, Valleytronics: opportunities, challenges, and paths forward. Small 14, 1801483 (2018) 13

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    K. F. Mak, C. Lee, J. Hone, J. Shan, T. F. Heinz, Atomically thin MoS2: a new direct-gap semiconductor, Physical Review Letters 105, 136805 (2010)

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    Splendiani, L

    A. Splendiani, L. Sun, Y. Zhang, T. Li, J. Kim, C. Chim, G. Galli, F. Wang, Emerging photoluminescence in monolayer MoS2. Nano Letters 10, 1271–1275 (2010)

    work page 2010

Show all 32 references
  1. [9]

    Kormányos, G

    A. Kormányos, G. Burkard, M. Gmitra, J. Fabian, V. Zólyomi, N. D. Drummond, V. Fal'ko, k·p theory for two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide semiconductors. 2D Materials 2, 022001 (2015)

    2015

  2. [10]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties. Reviews of Modern Physics 82, 1959 (2010)

    2010

  3. [11]

    Chernikov, T

    A. Chernikov, T. C. Berkelbach, H. M. Hill, A. Rigosi, Y. Li, B. Aslan, D. R. Reichman, M. S. Hybertsen, T. F. Heinz, Exciton binding energy and nonhydrogenic Rydberg series in monolayer WS2. Physical Review Letters 113, 076802 (2014)

    2014

  4. [12]

    H. Zeng, J. Dai, W. Yao, D. Xiao, X. Cui, Valley polarization in MoS2 monolayers by optical pumping. Nature Nanotechnology 7, 490–493 (2012)

    2012

  5. [13]

    K. F. Mak, K. He, J. Shan, T. F. Heinz, Control of valley polarization in monolayer MoS2 by optical helicity. Nature Nanotechnology 7, 494–498 (2012)

    2012

  6. [14]

    T. Cao, G. Wang, W. Han, H. Ye, C. Zhu, J. Shi, Q. Niu, P. Tan, E. Wang, B. Liu, J. Feng, Valley-selective circular dichroism of monolayer molybdenum disulphide. Nature Communications 3, 887 (2012

    2012

  7. [15]

    R. E. Silva, M. Ivanov, Á. Jiménez-Galán, All-optical valley switch and clock of electronic dephasing. Optics Express 30, 30347–30355 (2022)

    2022

  8. [16]

    N. Rana, G. Dixit, All-optical ultrafast valley switching in two-dimensional materials. Physical Review Applied 19, 034056 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    Sharma, P

    S. Sharma, P. Elliott, S. Shallcross, Valley control by linearly polarized laser pulses: example of WSe2. Optica 9, 947–952 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    K. Hao, G. Moody, F. Wu, C. K. Dass, L. Xu, C.-H. Chen, L. Sun, M.-Y. Li, L.-J. Li, A. H. MacDonald, X. Li, Direct measurement of exciton valley coherence in monolayer WSe2. Nature Physics 12, 677–682 (2016)

    2016

  11. [19]

    Dal Conte, F

    S. Dal Conte, F. Bottegoni, E. A. A. Pogna, D. De Fazio, S. Ambrogio, I. Bargigia, C. D’Andrea, A. Lombardo, M. Bruna, F. Ciccacci, A. C. Ferrari, G. Cerullo, M. Finazzi, Ultrafast valley relaxation dynamics in monolayer MoS2 probed by nonequilibrium optical techniques. Physic...

    2015

  12. [20]

    M. Z. Maialle, E. A. de Andrada e Silva, L. J. Sham, Exciton spin dynamics in quantum wells. Physical Review B 47, 15776 (1993)

    1993

  13. [21]

    T. Yu, M. Wu, Valley depolarization due to intervalley and intravalley electron-hole exchange interactions in monolayer MoS2. Physical Review B 89, 205303 (2014)

    2014

  14. [22]

    Selig, G

    M. Selig, G. Berghäuser, A. Raja, P. Nagler, C. Schüller, T. F. Heinz, T. Korn, A. Chernikov, E. Malic, A. Knorr, Excitonic linewidth and coherence lifetime in monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides. Nature Communications 7, 13279 (2016)

    2016

  15. [23]

    Brida, C

    D. Brida, C. Manzoni, G. Cerullo, Phase-locked pulses for two-dimensional spectroscopy by a birefringent delay line. Optics Letters 37, 3027–3029 (2012)

    2012

  16. [24]

    S. A. Bourelle, F. V. A. Camargo, S. Ghosh, T. Neumann, T. W. J. van de Goor, R. Shivanna, T. Winkler, G. Cerullo, F. Deschler, Optical control of exciton spin dynamics in layered metal halide perovskites via polaronic state formation. Nature Communications 13, 3320 (2022) 14

    2022

  17. [25]

    Yu, G.-B

    H. Yu, G.-B. Liu, P. Gong, X. Xu, W. Yao, Dirac cones and Dirac saddle points of bright excitons in monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides. Nature Communications 5, 3876 (2014)

    2014

  18. [26]

    Plechinger, P

    G. Plechinger, P. Nagler, A. Arora, R. Schmidt, A. Chernikov, A. G. del Águila, P. C. M. Christianen, R. Bratschitsch, C. Schüller, T. Korn, Trion fine structure and coupled spin–valley dynamics in monolayer tungsten disulfide. Nature Communications 7, 12715 (2016)

    2016

  19. [27]

    M. Kira, S. W. Koch, Semiconductor Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, 2011)

    2011

  20. [28]

    X. Xu, W. Yao, D. Xiao, T. F. Heinz, Spin and pseudospins in layered transition metal dichalcogenides. Nature Physics 10, 343–350 (2014)

    2014

  21. [29]

    Rzaźewski, Atoms and laser light: The theory of coherent atomic excitation

    K. Rzaźewski, Atoms and laser light: The theory of coherent atomic excitation. Science 250, 1603–1603 (1990)

    1990

  22. [30]

    Vivas-Viaña, A

    A. Vivas-Viaña, A. González-Tudela, C. S. Muñoz Unconventional mechanism of virtual-state population through dissipation. Physical Review A 106, 012217 (2022)

    2022

  23. [31]

    Breuer, F

    H.-P. Breuer, F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford University PressOxford, 2007)

    2007

  24. [32]

    D. G. Tempel, A. Aspuru-Guzik, Relaxation and dephasing in open quantum systems time- dependent density functional theory: Properties of exact functionals from an exactly-solvable model system. Chemical Physics 391, 130–142 (2011)

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.