Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 62 references

Defect Dynamics in Cholesterics: Beyond the Peach-Koehler Force

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In strongly chiral cholesterics, +1/2 defects flip sign by emitting expanding meron lines, so Peach–Koehler force does not govern their motion.

desk verdict A genuinely new meron-emission mechanism for cholesteric defect dynamics, with a clean parameter-free flow-field calculation; the anti-Peach-Koehler claim is suggestive but not proven, because the PK force is only evaluated on approximate ansätze. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.08866 v1 pith:WSLDNAZW submitted 2024-12-12 cond-mat.soft

Joseph Pollard , Richard G. Morris This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.soft MSC 76A1553D1082D30 PACS 61.30.-v61.30.Jf
keywords cholestericliquidcrystalsdisclinationlinesmeronsdouble-twistcylindersPeach-KoehlerforceGraystabilitytheoremcontacttopologydefectdynamics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Chiral liquid crystals, or cholesterics, have a helically twisted ground state, and this paper argues that the usual rule for defect motion—the Peach–Koehler interaction force borrowed from crystals—breaks in them. At strong chirality, a +1/2 disclination line does not simply attract or repel neighbours; it changes winding to −1/2 by ejecting a +1 meron line, a nonsingular double-twist cylinder, and the outward expansion of that meron tube pushes the defect. The paper supports this with Landau–de Gennes simulations and an analytic velocity field derived from the Gray stability theorem of contact topology. If the claim is right, cholesteric defect dynamics and the nucleation of double-twist regions are governed by meron expansion rather than defect–defect forces, with consequences for twist-bend, splay-bend, and chiral magnetic materials.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Gray stability theorem, a contact-topology result that lets director homotopies that preserve nonzero twist be represented by isotopies. For a director obeying the relaxation equation $\partial_t n = K(\nabla^2 n - 2q_0\nabla\times n)$, the theorem yields the material velocity field $v = \frac{K}{n\cdot\nabla\times n}(n\times\nabla^2 n - 2q_0 n\times\nabla\times n)$. For the double-twist cylinder $n_{\mathrm{DT}} = \sin(\pi r/2R)\,e_{\theta} - \cos(\pi r/2R)\,e_z$ this reduces to $v_{\mathrm{DT}} = \frac{K q_0 R}{\pi r}\sin^2(\pi r/2R)\,e_r$, a purely outward radial flow that expands the meron core and carries the attached disclination outward. An energy calculation for $|D n_{\mathrm{DT}}|^2$ fixes the equilibrium core size at $q_0R\approx 1.479$, showing where expansion stops. Against this, the paper computes the Peach–Koehler force $f_{\mathrm{PK}} = (B\cdot\sigma)\times t$ and its chiral extra term and shows that neither reproduces the simulated motion.

What would settle it

Track a single +1/2 disclination in a cholesteric of pitch equal to the box height with no second defect nearby: the paper predicts spontaneous conversion to −1/2 via an emitted double-twist meron and motion along the tail, while the Peach–Koehler picture predicts no spontaneous conversion. In the two-line geometry, measure the separation as a function of time: straight-line approach ending in annihilation would falsify the claim, whereas approach that halts with the +1/2 line converted, at a separation set by $q_0R\approx 1.479$, supports it. A direct numerical check is to evaluate the velocity field (23) in a simulated texture containing a meron and verify that the flow inside the double-twist cylinder is radially outward.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms: in a cholesteric with sufficiently strong chirality, a disclination of $+1/2$ winding converts into a $-1/2$ disclination by emitting a $+1$-winding meron line with Bloch (rotational) profile, the double-twist cylinder. The material flow that drives this conversion is obtained from the Gray stability theorem as $v = \frac{K}{n\cdot\nabla\times n}(n\times\nabla^{2}n - 2q_0 n\times\nabla\times n)$. Around a $+1/2$ $\chi$-line this flow opens up the comet profile along its tail, ejecting a meron whose core expands radially outward, dragging the newly formed $-1/2$ line along the original tail direction; around a $-1/2$ line the flow is inward and stabilising. The same mechanism makes initially straight $+1/2$ $\chi$-lines buckle into helices with kinks and leaves disclinations carrying meron tethers, and during quenches produces networks of $-1/2$ $\chi$-lines joined by meron tubes. Applied to a radial hedgehog point defect in a spherical cholesteric droplet, the flow field predicts displacement of the defect from the centre toward the boundary, as observed. The chiral correction to the Peach–Koehler force vanishes for the harmonic model director used for two parallel lines, so that theory cannot account for the simulated motion.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a velocity field constructed from the director's relaxation dynamics, taken at points away from the defect line, tells us how the defect line itself moves—even though the decisive step is a change in winding where the construction is not valid, a limitation the paper states explicitly.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At a well-defined chirality crossover (pitch about 0.2 of the box height in the simulations), +1/2-to-−1/2 conversion by meron emission replaces the achiral behaviour in which opposite-winding defects approach and annihilate.
  • A +1/2 χ-line is unstable to helical buckling, with helix handedness matching the material handedness; on longer times the line ends up as a −1/2 disclination carrying meron tethers, with D+6 crossing structure.
  • Meron expansion screens disclination interactions: opposite-winding lines can reach a finite equilibrium separation rather than annihilating, and the equilibrium radius of an emitted double-twist cylinder is $q_0R\approx 1.479$.
  • Quenches at high chirality spontaneously generate networks of −1/2 χ-lines connected by meron tubes, providing a route from the tight helical state to overtwisted textures such as blue phases and meron/Skyrmion lattices.
  • The same velocity-field analysis predicts and matches the off-centre displacement of a radial hedgehog in a cholesteric droplet; the equilibrium displacement increases with chirality and saturates near the boundary.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: If meron-mediated conversion dominates, chiral-nematic coarsening should show a different event census than achiral coarsening: winding-conversion events and meron expansions rather than only annihilation events, a statistic that simulations can count.
  • Editorial inference: Because the Frank energy with the chiral term is the same as a chiral ferromagnet with Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction, the same flow argument should govern the motion of Bloch points and the expansion of merons/Skyrmions in those magnetic materials.
  • Editorial inference: The optimal meron radius $q_0R\approx 1.479$ is a testable length: double-twist cylinders emitted from defects should stop growing at $R\approx0.235p$, which could be measured by tracking cylinder radii after a quench.
  • Editorial inference: The two mechanisms predict different trajectories: Peach–Koehler gives straight-line approach between opposite defects, whereas meron-driven motion moves the +1/2 line along its tail, so trajectory shape alone could separate the mechanisms in experiments.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies disclination dynamics in cholesteric liquid crystals and argues that the standard Peach-Koehler interaction force fails in strongly chiral systems. Simulations show that +1/2 disclination lines convert into -1/2 lines by emitting a +1-winding meron line (a double-twist cylinder), that the resulting defect moves along the tail of the original comet, and that initially straight chi-lines buckle into helices. The authors attribute this behavior to defect-meron interactions rather than defect-defect interactions, and they propose replacing the Peach-Koehler framework with a contact-topology approach: using the Gray stability theorem, they derive a velocity field from the director relaxation equation, Eq. (23), and use it to explain meron expansion, winding changes, and the motion of a hedgehog point defect in a spherical droplet. The paper also derives a parameter-free equilibrium radius q0 R approximately 1.479 for a double-twist cylinder, Eq. (36).

Significance. If the central claims are established, this paper would provide a new conceptual framework for defect dynamics in cholesterics and other chiral or modulated phases, connecting contact topology to material flow and identifying meron emission as the fundamental process that generates double-twist structures. The analytic calculations are explicit and the approach yields falsifiable predictions, such as the +1/2-to--1/2 winding change, the helical buckling of chi-lines, and the off-center equilibrium of hedgehogs in chiral droplets. The equilibrium radius calculation in Eq. (36) is parameter-free, and the simulations provide direct evidence for the reported phenomenology. However, the paper's central negative claim about Peach-Koehler failure and the dynamical mechanism inferred from the Gray stability flow field are not fully established, as detailed in the major comments.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section III, Eqs. (14)-(19)] The calculation showing that the chiral Peach-Koehler terms vanish is performed on the harmonic director (14) and the approximate local model (18), neither of which minimizes the cholesteric free energy. As the authors correctly state in Section II.C, the Peach-Koehler/Ericksen force is surface-independent only when the Ericksen stress is divergence-free, i.e., on an energy minimizer. Therefore the vanishing of the extra term (17) and of the q0 contributions in Eq. (19) does not establish that the exact minimizer's Peach-Koehler force on the +1/2 defect is directed along the defect-defect axis. This leaves the central negative claim 'Peach-Koehler fails' unproven. To support the claim, the authors would need to evaluate fPK on a true energy minimizer (or a high-quality numerical minimizer obtained with the same Landau-de Gennes model used in the simulations) and show that the stress components along the tail do not produce the observed motion; alternatively, the claim should be weakened to 'the standard harmonic-ansatz Peach-Koehler calculation fails.'
  2. [Section IV.B, Eqs. (22)-(23) and Fig. 4] The Gray stability flow field v is derived under the assumption that the evolution is an isotopy with no structural changes and nonvanishing twist. The authors acknowledge in Section IV.B that v 'will not generally be the velocity of the defects themselves' and that it is computed 'at any time except the instant in which structural changes occur.' The central event of the paper, meron emission, is precisely such a structural change, and v is singular at the defect line. Consequently, the inference that meron expansion drives the +1/2 defect's motion is a heuristic based on the flow pattern rather than a rigorous derivation. The paper should either define a regularized defect velocity obtained as a limit of the surrounding material velocity, or directly test the predicted flow field against tracked defect trajectories in the simulations.
  3. [Section IV.B, Eqs. (35)-(36)] The energy expression in Eq. (35) appears dimensionally inconsistent as printed: the term -4/R has units of inverse length while the other terms are dimensionless (or the whole expression would require additional factors of q0 to be dimensionally homogeneous). Moreover, differentiating the printed expression cannot yield Eq. (36), because the derivative of -4/R contributes a positive term +4/R^2 that makes dE/dR = 0 impossible with the positive coefficients shown. Since the equilibrium radius q0 R approximately 1.479 is used to support the meron-expansion mechanism, this derivation needs to be corrected with the proper sign and prefactors.
  4. [Section V, Eqs. (40)-(42)] The point-defect application computes the Gray stability flow field from the twisted hedgehog ansatz (40), whose twist vanishes on the plane x = 0 and which contains a defect at the origin where v is singular. The authors use the limit of the ex-component of v to infer that the defect moves along the positive x-axis. This is plausible and consistent with the simulations, but it is another instance where the flow-field method is applied at or beyond the domain of its definition. The section should clearly state that this is an extrapolation, and ideally provide a direct numerical comparison between the computed v and the tracked defect trajectory in the simulations.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Section I] There are several typographical errors: 'not not been studied' in the abstract, 'cannot be a approximated' in Section I, 'interaction interaction' in Section II, and 'Staring from' in Section III.
  2. [Section III] The crossover from achiral behavior to chiral behavior is reported at a approximately 0.2, but no figure or quantitative criterion is given for how this threshold was determined; please provide the numerical details or a plot showing the crossover.
  3. [Section V, Eq. (43)] The sigmoid fit in Eq. (43) introduces two free parameters a and b, but the paper does not report the number of simulations or the uncertainty of the fit; this would help the reader assess the robustness of the curve shown in Fig. 5(c).
  4. [Section IV.B and Fig. 4] The structural change is referred to as a D5_- 'parabolic umbilic' change with a citation to Ref. [25], but the notation is not defined in the present paper; a brief explanation of the D5_- labeling would improve self-containedness.
  5. [Abstract] The abstract says the standard formulation 'seemingly fails,' while the Discussion states more strongly that the Peach-Koehler force 'does not explain this behavior'; the abstract should be aligned with the actual strength of the claim that can be supported by the calculations.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the meron-emission scenario is established by independent Landau-de Gennes simulation, and the Gray-stability flow field is derived from the Frank energy rather than fitted to the observed dynamics.

full rationale

The central dynamical claim—that +1/2 disclinations in a strongly chiral cholesteric emit a meron line and change winding to −1/2, and that meron expansion drives defect motion—is established by Landau–de Gennes simulation (Section III, Eq. (16)), not assumed by the theory that explains it. The Gray-stability velocity field (Eqs. (22)–(25)) is a mathematical consequence of the cholesteric relaxation equation (7) applied to model directors; it is not fitted to the simulated trajectories. The equilibrium double-twist-cylinder radius q0R ≈ 1.479 follows from the independent Wright–Mermin energy minimization (Eqs. (35)–(36)). The paper does rely on the authors' earlier topological work [25, 32, 33] for the classification of tight/overtwisted disclinations and for the model director forms nχ and nτ, but those are parameter-free topological/geometric statements with stated assumptions, not fits to the present results, and the present simulations independently reproduce the winding-change events. The explicit sigmoid fit in Eq. (43) is descriptive of numerically computed equilibrium displacements and is not presented as a first-principles prediction. The acknowledged limitation that the Peach–Koehler force was evaluated on an approximate, non-minimizing director ('We do not know how to write down a director field that exactly minimises the chiral energy') is a validity gap in the negative claim about Peach–Koehler, not a circular reduction: the calculation's conclusion is conditional, and the authors themselves flag that the vanishing of chiral stress terms may be an artifact of the ansatz. No step in the derivation chain equates a prediction to an input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the one-elastic-constant Frank energy, the gradient-descent relaxation Eq. (7), the validity of the Gray stability flow field as a proxy for defect motion, and the specific model director fields used for chi-, tau-, double-twist, and twisted-hedgehog textures. Two parameters (a and b) are fitted to the droplet displacement curve but play no role in the mechanism. No new physical entities are introduced; merons, double-twist cylinders, and meron tethers are pre-existing topological solitons in cholesterics.

free parameters (2)
  • sigmoid slope a = 12.111
    Fitted to the simulated d/R versus R/p curve in Eq. (43) to present the equilibrium displacement of a hedgehog defect; not used in the main meron-emission mechanism.
  • sigmoid midpoint b = 0.316
    Same fit as above, Eq. (43), describing where the displacement transitions.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The cholesteric free energy is well described by the one-elastic-constant Frank energy (1) with a single elastic constant K and chirality q0.
    Used throughout Sections II-IV for analytical derivations; the authors propose extensions to anisotropic materials but do not analyze them.
  • domain assumption Director dynamics follow the gradient-descent relaxation d_t n = K (Laplacian n - 2 q0 curl n), Eq. (7).
    This relaxation is inserted into the Gray stability formula (22) to obtain the flow field (23); the simulations minimize the same Landau-de Gennes energy, so the analytic flow field and the numerics are not independent.
  • domain assumption The Gray stability theorem applies to director fields with defects, so the flow field v = (1/(n dot curl n)) n cross d_t n can be used to infer defect motion away from the instant of structural change.
    Invoked in Section IV.B; the paper notes v is not the physical velocity and is singular at defect lines, so inferring defect motion from v is a heuristic step.
  • domain assumption A consistent sense of handedness, n dot curl n nonzero, is maintained except at specified surfaces and defect cores.
    Required for the Gray stability formula (22); the authors relax it for the hedgehog example in Section V and argue the framework still works.
  • ad hoc to paper The model director fields n_chi (30), n_tau (18)/(39), n_DT (32), and n_TH (40) are sufficiently accurate approximations of the true minimizing textures.
    These ansatze are used to compute closed-form flow fields and energies; their accuracy is justified by comparison with simulation and experiment, not by derivation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Defect Dynamics in Cholesterics: Beyond the Peach-Koehler Force." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WSLDNAZW

@misc{pith2026241208866,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Defect Dynamics in Cholesterics: Beyond the Peach-Koehler Force},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WSLDNAZW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.08866}
}
abstract

The Peach-Koehler force between disclination lines was originally formulated in the study of crystalline solids, and has since been adopted to provide a notion of interactions between disclination lines in nematic liquid crystals. Here, we argue that the standard formulation of this interaction force seemingly fails for materials where there is a symmetry-broken ground state, and suggest that this is due to the interaction between disclination lines and merons: non-singular yet non-trivial topological solitons. We examine this in the context of chiral nematic (cholesteric) liquid crystals, which provide a natural setting for studying these interactions due to their energetic preference for meron tubes in the form of double-twist cylinders. Through a combination of theory and simulation we demonstrate that, for sufficiently strong chirality, defects of $+1/2$ winding will change their winding through the emission of a meron line, and that interactions between the merons and defects dominate over defect-defect interactions. Instead of Peach-Koehler framework, we employ a method based on contact topology - the Gray stability theorem - to directly calculate the velocity field of the material. We apply our framework to point defects as well as disclination lines. Our results have implications not just for chiral materials, but also for other phases with modulated ground states, such as the twist-bend and splay-bend nematics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.08866 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: The motion of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Initially-straight [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Illustration of the Gray stability theorem for a meron [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: (a) The material flow field generated by the director distortions around a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: (a) In a cholesteric, a hedgehog point defect initially at the centre of a spherical droplet with radial anchoring will [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The sign of q0 deter- mines the sense of this rotation

    (1) Here, K is the elastic constant and q0 is a symmetry- breaking parameter with dimensions of inverse length which sets the pitch length p = 2π/q0, the distance over which the director rotates by 2 π. The sign of q0 deter- mines the sense of this rotation. We take q0 > 0 for a right-handed material, but emphasise that all of our results are equally vali...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Kl´ eman, L

    M. Kl´ eman, L. Michel, and G. Toulouse. Classification of topologically stable defects in ordered media. Journal de Physique Lettres, 38(10):195–197, 1977

    work page 1977

  3. [3]

    Kl´ eman

    M. Kl´ eman. Relationship between burgers circuit, volterra process and homotopy groups. Journal de Physique Lettres, 38(10):199–202, 1977

    work page 1977

  4. [4]

    N. D. Mermin. The topological theory of defects in or- dered media. Reviews of Modern Physics, 51(3):591–648, July 1979

    work page 1979

  5. [5]

    Volovik and O.D

    G.E. Volovik and O.D. Lavrentovich. Topological dy- namics of defects: boojums in nematic drops. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., 85:1997, 1983

    work page 1997

  6. [6]

    Points, lines, and walls: in liquid crys- tals, magnetic systems, and various ordered media

    Maurice Kleman. Points, lines, and walls: in liquid crys- tals, magnetic systems, and various ordered media. J. Wiley, Chichester ; New York, 1983

    work page 1983

  7. [7]

    Topological properties of ordinary nemat- ics in 3-space

    Klaus J¨ anich. Topological properties of ordinary nemat- ics in 3-space. Acta Applicandae Mathematicae, 8(1):65– 74, January 1987

    work page 1987

  8. [8]

    Defects in liquid crystals

    M Kle´ eman. Defects in liquid crystals. Reports on Progress in Physics, 52(5):555–654, May 1989

    work page 1989

Show all 62 references
  1. [9]

    Kl´ eman and J

    M. Kl´ eman and J. Friedel. Disclinations, dislocations, and continuous defects: A reappraisal. Reviews of Mod- ern Physics, 80(1):61–115, January 2008

    2008

  2. [10]

    Topology and geometry of nematic braids

    Simon ˇCopar. Topology and geometry of nematic braids. Physics Reports, 538(1):1–37, May 2014

    2014

  3. [11]

    Cheng Long, Xingzhou Tang, Robin L. B. Selinger, and Jonathan V. Selinger. Geometry and mechanics of discli- nation lines in 3D nematic liquid crystals. Soft Matter, 17(8):2265–2278, 2021

    2021

  4. [12]

    Alexander and Randall D

    Gareth P. Alexander and Randall D. Kamien. Entangle- ments and Whitehead products: generalizing Kleman’s construction to higher-dimensional defects. Liquid Crys- tals Reviews, 10(1-2):91–97, July 2022

    2022

  5. [13]

    Schimming and Jorge Vi˜ nals

    Cody D. Schimming and Jorge Vi˜ nals. Kinemat- ics and dynamics of disclination lines in three- dimensional nematics. Proceedings of the Royal Soci- ety A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 479(2273):20230042, May 2023

    2023

  6. [14]

    Selinger

    Cheng Long and Jonathan V. Selinger. Applications of the Peach-Koehler force in liquid crystals. Liquid Crys- tals, pages 1–17, January 2024

    2024

  7. [15]

    Ordering, metastability and phase transitions in two-dimensional systems

    J M Kosterlitz and D J Thouless. Ordering, metastability and phase transitions in two-dimensional systems. Jour- nal of Physics C: Solid State Physics, 6(7):1181–1203, April 1973

    1973

  8. [16]

    S. R. Renn and T. C. Lubensky. Abrikosov dislocation lattice in a model of the cholesteric – to – smectic- A transition. Physical Review A, 38(4):2132–2147, August 1988

    1988

  9. [17]

    Pargellis, and Neil Turok

    Issac Chuang, Bernard Yurke, Andrew N. Pargellis, and Neil Turok. Coarsening dynamics in uniaxial nematic liquid crystals. Physical Review E, 47(5):3343–3356, May 1993

    1993

  10. [18]

    G.I. Taylor. The mechanism of plastic deformation of crystals. Part I.—Theoretical. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character, 145(855):362–387, July 1934

    1934

  11. [19]

    Philippe Poulin, Holger Stark, T. C. Lubensky, and D. A. Weitz. Novel Colloidal Interactions in Anisotropic Fluids. Science, 275(5307):1770–1773, March 1997

    1997

  12. [20]

    ˇSkarabot, M

    M. ˇSkarabot, M. Ravnik, S. ˇZumer, U. Tkalec, I. Poberaj, D. Babiˇ c, N. Osterman, and I. Muˇ seviˇ c. Two-dimensional dipolar nematic colloidal crystals. Physical Review E, 76(5):051406, November 2007

    2007

  13. [21]

    Peach and J

    M. Peach and J. S. Koehler. The Forces Exerted on Dis- locations and the Stress Fields Produced by Them. Phys- ical Review, 80(3):436–439, November 1950

    1950

  14. [22]

    J. D. Eshelby. The force on a disclination in a liquid crys- tal. Philosophical Magazine A, 42(3):359–367, September 1980

    1980

  15. [23]

    Deutsch, Joseph Angelo, Christopher Culbreath, Hiroshi Yokoyama, Jonathan V

    Cheng Long, Matthew J. Deutsch, Joseph Angelo, Christopher Culbreath, Hiroshi Yokoyama, Jonathan V. Selinger, and Robin L.B. Selinger. Frank-Read Mech- anism in Nematic Liquid Crystals. Physical Review X, 14(1):011044, March 2024

    2024

  16. [24]

    Beller, Thomas Machon, Simon ˇCopar, Daniel M

    Daniel A. Beller, Thomas Machon, Simon ˇCopar, Daniel M. Sussman, Gareth P. Alexander, Randall D. Kamien, and Ricardo A. Mosna. Geometry of the Cholesteric Phase. Physical Review X , 4(3):031050, September 2014

    2014

  17. [25]

    Lavrentovich, and Jonathan V

    Antal J´ akli, Oleg D. Lavrentovich, and Jonathan V. Selinger. Physics of liquid crystals of bent-shaped molecules. Reviews of Modern Physics, 90(4):045004, November 2018

    2018

  18. [26]

    Joseph Pollard and Richard G. Morris. Morse Theory and Meron Mediated Interactions Between Disclination Lines in Nematics, August 2024. arXiv:2408.01032 [cond-mat, physics:math-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Wright and N

    David C. Wright and N. David Mermin. Crystalline liquids: the blue phases. Reviews of Modern Physics, 61(2):385–432, April 1989

    1989

  20. [28]

    An Introduction to Contact Topology

    Hansj¨ org Geiges. An Introduction to Contact Topology. Cambridge University Press, 1 edition, March 2008

    2008

  21. [29]

    Contact topology and the structure and dynamics of cholesterics

    Thomas Machon. Contact topology and the structure and dynamics of cholesterics. New Journal of Physics, 19(11):113030, November 2017

    2017

  22. [30]

    Alexander

    Joseph Pollard, Gregor Posnjak, Simon ˇCopar, Igor Muˇ seviˇ c, and Gareth P. Alexander. Point Defects, Topo- logical Chirality, and Singularity Theory in Cholesteric Liquid-Crystal Droplets. Physical Review X, 9(2):021004, April 2019

    2019

  23. [31]

    Layering transitions and metastable structures of cholesteric liquid crystals in cylindrical confinement

    Jonghee Eun, Joseph Pollard, Sung-Jo Kim, Thomas Machon, and Joonwoo Jeong. Layering transitions and metastable structures of cholesteric liquid crystals in cylindrical confinement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(33):e2102926118, August 2021

    2021

  24. [32]

    Yucen Han, James Dalby, Apala Majumdar, Benjamin M. G. D. Carter, and Thomas Machon. Uniaxial ver- sus biaxial pathways in one-dimensional cholesteric liq- uid crystals. Physical Review Research, 4(3):L032018, August 2022

    2022

  25. [33]

    Alexander

    Joseph Pollard and Gareth P. Alexander. Contact Topology and the Classification of Disclination Lines in Cholesteric Liquid Crystals. Physical Review Letters, 130(22):228102, June 2023. 16

    2023

  26. [34]

    Escape into the Third Dimension in Cholesteric Liquid Crystals

    Joseph Pollard and Gareth P Alexander. Escape into the Third Dimension in Cholesteric Liquid Crystals. New Journal of Physics, June 2024

    2024

  27. [35]

    Callan, Roger Dashen, and David J

    Curtis G. Callan, Roger Dashen, and David J. Gross. To- ward a theory of the strong interactions. Physical Review D, 17(10):2717–2763, May 1978

    1978

  28. [36]

    John W. Gray. Some Global Properties of Contact Struc- tures. The Annals of Mathematics, 69(2):421, March 1959

    1959

  29. [37]

    Alexander

    Thomas Machon and Gareth P. Alexander. Umbilic Lines in Orientational Order. Physical Review X, 6(1):011033, March 2016

    2016

  30. [38]

    G. E. Volovik and K. Zhang. String monopoles, string walls, vortex skyrmions, and nexus objects in the polar distorted $B$ phase of $ˆ{3}\mathrm{He}$. Physical Review Research, 2(2):023263, June 2020

    2020

  31. [39]

    G. E. Volovik. Composite Topological Objects in Topo- logical Superfluids. Journal of Experimental and Theo- retical Physics, 131(1):11–17, July 2020

    2020

  32. [40]

    Poenaru and G

    V. Poenaru and G. Toulouse. The crossing of defects in ordered media and the topology of 3-manifolds. Journal de Physique, 38(8):887–895, 1977

    1977

  33. [41]

    Bow- ick, and Ivan I

    Jin-Sheng Wu, Roberto Abril Valenzuela, Mark J. Bow- ick, and Ivan I. Smalyukh. Topological Rigidity and Non-Abelian defect junctions in chiral nematic sys- tems with effective biaxial symmetry, October 2024. arXiv:2410.19293 [cond-mat]

    2024 arXiv

  34. [42]

    J. D. Eshelby. The elastic energy-momentum tensor. Journal of Elasticity, 5(3):321–335, November 1975

    1975

  35. [43]

    The physics of liquid crystals

    Pierre-Gilles deGennes and Jacques Prost. The physics of liquid crystals. Number 83 in International series of monographs on physics. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2. ed., repr edition, 2013

    2013

  36. [44]

    Sethna, David C

    James P. Sethna, David C. Wright, and N. D. Mermin. Relieving Cholesteric Frustration: The Blue Phase in a Curved Space. Physical Review Letters, 51(6):467–470, August 1983

    1983

  37. [45]

    Selinger

    Jonathan V. Selinger. Interpretation of saddle-splay and the Oseen-Frank free energy in liquid crystals. Liquid Crystals Reviews, 6(2):129–142, July 2018

    2018

  38. [46]

    DeGennes

    J Friedel and P.G. DeGennes. Buckling due to distortion in liquid crystals. C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, Ser. A B, 268:257–259, 1969

    1969

  39. [47]

    Selinger

    Xingzhou Tang and Jonathan V. Selinger. Orientation of topological defects in 2D nematic liquid crystals. Soft Matter, 13(32):5481–5490, 2017

    2017

  40. [48]

    Defect dynamics in active nematics

    Luca Giomi, Mark J Bowick, Prashant Mishra, Rastko Sknepnek, and M Cristina Marchetti. Defect dynamics in active nematics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sci- ences, 372(2029):20130365, November 2014

    2014

  41. [49]

    Symmetry Breaking of Self-Propelled Topological Defects in Thin- Film Active Chiral Nematics

    Weiqiang Wang, Haijie Ren, and Rui Zhang. Symmetry Breaking of Self-Propelled Topological Defects in Thin- Film Active Chiral Nematics. Physical Review Letters, 132(3):038301, January 2024

    2024

  42. [50]

    Smalyukh, S.V

    I.I. Smalyukh, S.V. Shiyanovskii, and O.D. Lavren- tovich. Three-dimensional imaging of orientational order by fluorescence confocal polarizing microscopy. Chemical Physics Letters, 336(1-2):88–96, March 2001

    2001

  43. [51]

    Tai and Ivan I

    Jung-Shen B. Tai and Ivan I. Smalyukh. Three- dimensional crystals of adaptive knots. Science, 365(6460):1449–1453, September 2019

    2019

  44. [52]

    Smalyukh

    Jin-Sheng Wu and Ivan I. Smalyukh. Hopfions, helikno- tons, skyrmions, torons and both abelian and nonabelian vortices in chiral liquid crystals. Liquid Crystals Reviews, 10(1-2):34–68, July 2022

    2022

  45. [53]

    Pieranski

    P. Pieranski. Cholesteric dislocations in mica wedges. Liquid Crystals Reviews, 10(1-2):6–33, July 2022

    2022

  46. [54]

    Exotic structures of a thin film of chi- ral liquid crystals: a numerical study based on the Lan- dau–de Gennes theory

    Jun-ichi Fukuda. Exotic structures of a thin film of chi- ral liquid crystals: a numerical study based on the Lan- dau–de Gennes theory. Liquid Crystals Reviews, 10(1- 2):69–90, July 2022

    2022

  47. [55]

    Quasi-two- dimensional Skyrmion lattices in a chiral nematic liquid crystal

    Jun-ichi Fukuda and Slobodan ˇZumer. Quasi-two- dimensional Skyrmion lattices in a chiral nematic liquid crystal. Nature Communications, 2(1):246, March 2011

    2011

  48. [56]

    Cholesteric Blue Phases Under Confinement: Skyrmion Lattices and Other Exotic Defect Structures

    Jun-ichi Fukuda and Slobodan ˇZumer. Cholesteric Blue Phases Under Confinement: Skyrmion Lattices and Other Exotic Defect Structures. In Progress in Liquid Crystal Science and Technology, pages 113–131. WORLD SCIENTIFIC, May 2013

    2013

  49. [57]

    Hidden topological constellations and polyvalent charges in chiral nematic droplets

    Gregor Posnjak, Simon ˇCopar, and Igor Muˇ seviˇ c. Hidden topological constellations and polyvalent charges in chiral nematic droplets. Nature Communications, 8(1):14594, February 2017

    2017

  50. [58]

    Silvia Paparini and Epifanio G. Virga. Spiralling defect cores in chromonic hedgehogs. Liquid Crystals, 50(7- 10):1498–1516, August 2023

    2023

  51. [59]

    Federica Ciuchi, Maria Penelope De Santo, Silvia Pa- parini, Lorenza Spina, and Epifanio G. Virga. Inversion ring in chromonic twisted hedgehogs: theory and exper- iment. Liquid Crystals, pages 1–13, February 2024

    2024

  52. [60]

    Gauge theory of continuous media with topological defects: Uniaxial nematic liquid crystals and superfluid 4He

    Kyozi Kawasaki and Helmut R Brand. Gauge theory of continuous media with topological defects: Uniaxial nematic liquid crystals and superfluid 4He. Annals of Physics, 160(2):420–440, April 1985

    1985

  53. [61]

    Lubensky

    T.C. Lubensky. TGB phases: Abrikosov vortex lattices in liquid crystals. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 220(1-2):99–112, October 1995

    1995

  54. [62]

    For an effectively infinite anchoring strength this dis- tance will not depend on K, however for finite anchoring strength it will depend on the ratio between K and the elastic constant associated with the anchoring term in the free energy

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.