Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 91 references

Brain-inspired AI Agent: The Way Towards AGI

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proposes that an agent built from cortical-region functional modules and simplified functional connectivity networks can gain basic human-like cognitive intelligence, offering a route to AGI.

desk verdict A coherent but unsupported position paper that maps brain atlases onto agent modules; the central claim needs a mechanism and experiments before it earns referee time. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.08875 v1 pith:GQ5UGKEE submitted 2024-12-12 cs.NE cs.ETq-bio.NC

Bo Yu , Jiangning Wei , Minzhen Hu , Zejie Han , Tianjian Zou , Ye He , Jun Liu This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.NEcs.ETq-bio.NC
keywords brain-inspiredAIartificialgeneralintelligenceagentcorticalregionsfunctionalconnectivitynetworkslargelanguagemodelsarchitecturecognitivefunctions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the path to artificial general intelligence may run through a direct mapping from the brain's mesoscale organization to an agent's architecture. It proposes treating each cortical region as a functional module—implemented by models such as large language models, vision-language models, or object detectors—and wiring those modules along simplified functional connectivity pathways modeled on the brain's own networks. The authors contend that an agent built this way would move beyond task-specific workflows and gain basic cognitive capabilities across perception, planning, memory, reasoning, reflection, emotion, and language. This is a design proposal; the paper does not report an implementation or experiments testing the architecture.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the mapping table from ten agent-level cognitive functions to specific cortical areas and to the functional connectivity networks that link them. A functional node is one or more neural models (for example, a vision-language model for the visual cortex, an LLM for the prefrontal cortex), and its activation state determines whether it is engaged by the current task. The connectivity design follows functional connectivity rather than structural connectivity, so pathways such as the prefrontal–parietal network or the hippocampus–neocortex pathway become the agent's task-execution routes. This mapping and the activation scheme are what translate brain anatomy into a working agent structure.

What would settle it

Implement the proposed agent literally—an object detector for the visual module, an LLM for the prefrontal module, and the listed connectivity pathways. Run it against a plain LLM agent on a broad set of everyday tasks; if the brain-inspired wiring produces no measurable gain in task success or generality, the central claim would be falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that implementing the functional modules of cortical regions and their associated functional connectivity networks within an agent enables it to achieve basic cognitive intelligence comparable to human capabilities. In this design, the primary visual cortex becomes an object-detection module, the prefrontal cortex becomes a planning and decision module run by a large language model, and other regions supply memory, reasoning, reflection, emotion, and language modules. Each module has an activation state that determines whether it participates in the current task, and the workflow follows functional connectivity pathways rather than a task-specific script. The authors argue that this architecture is a feasible step toward AGI, while acknowledging that understanding of the brain, computational cost, and framework integration remain open problems.

Load-bearing premise

The architecture stands on the assumption that a real cortical region's function is captured by one deep-learning model and that a few hand-drawn connection pathways capture how brain regions cooperate.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • An agent built this way would handle a broad class of general tasks through the same ten brain-like modules rather than through workflows hand-crafted per task.
  • Perception, memory, planning, and action would be coordinated through explicit functional connectivity pathways, enabling parallel processing and cross-region information integration.
  • Activation states would make the agent's behavior follow a brain-like sequence: relevant regions switch on, process, and hand off to execution regions when a command is issued.
  • The architecture extends the classic perception-planning-action model with reflection, optimization, emotion, and language, giving a wider coverage of human cognitive functions.
  • If the proposal holds, such agents could reach cognitive abilities comparable to, or surpassing, human levels, as the authors state.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the same mapping logic could be pushed below the cortex, to subcortical structures and neuromodulatory systems, which the authors leave out; that is a natural test of whether the mesoscale cortex alone carries cognition.
  • Beyond the paper: the design is implementable today with existing LLMs and vision models, so a minimal Table I agent could be built and compared with a single-LLM agent on a fixed task battery; that comparison would isolate whether the wiring adds capability.
  • Beyond the paper: if the architecture proves productive, scaling may follow brain-like principles—adding nodes and pathways rather than enlarging one monolithic model—which implies a different scaling strategy for agent intelligence.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper proposes a 'brain-inspired AI agent' architecture in which mesoscale cortical regions of the human brain are modeled as functional modules, realized by LLMs or computer-vision tools, and interconnected by simplified 'functional connectivity networks.' The authors argue that implementing these modules and connectivity patterns in an agent would enable it to achieve basic cognitive intelligence akin to human capabilities, and they frame the proposal as a route to AGI. The paper reviews brain parcellation frameworks (Brodmann areas, HCP), introduces a table mapping cognitive functions to cortical areas and networks, surveys recent LLM-based single-agent architectures, and lists limitations and future directions.

Significance. If established, the proposal would be a valuable design principle for general-purpose agents, and the survey of existing agents in Table II usefully highlights capabilities often missing from current systems. The paper is a coherent high-level position, and its taxonomy of brain-like functions may be a useful starting point. However, the manuscript provides no implementation, experiments, benchmarks, or formal derivations, and its central claim is an untested existential assertion. There are no machine-checked proofs or reproducible artifacts against which the proposal could be evaluated, so the contribution as submitted is conceptual and unverified.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Section III-A] The central claim that implementing cortical-region functional modules and their functional connectivity networks in an agent 'enables it to achieve basic cognitive intelligence akin to human capabilities' is unsupported. The manuscript contains no implementation, no experiment, no benchmark, and no formal specification of the architecture. Section IV(2) admits that the architecture is 'insufficiently defined' and omits subcortical and fine-grained circuits. Because the abstract states the claim categorically rather than as a hypothesis, the paper currently asserts the very result it would need to demonstrate. At minimum, the wording should be weakened to a conjecture, or the paper should provide a proof-of-concept with quantitative evaluation.
  2. [Section II-B3 and Section III-A] The proposal treats 'functional connectivity' as an implementable connection pathway, but functional connectivity in neuroscience is a statistical measure of correlated activity (as in the DMN and ECN descriptions in Section II-B3). The paper says it 'simplified the corresponding functional connectivity networks, restricting interactions solely to the existing functional nodes,' yet never specifies what information flows between nodes, in what representation, on what temporal schedule, or how one node's output changes another node's state. Without this mechanistic content, the distinction between the proposed architecture and an arbitrary modular agent is only terminological, and the claim that the brain-inspired connectivity mechanism enables general intelligence is unfalsifiable.
  3. [Section III-A and Table I] The mapping of cognitive functions to specific cortical areas and to concrete tools is asserted without validation. For example, V1 is mapped to CNN/YOLO and the PFC to an LLM, but no argument shows that these tools capture the computational role of the corresponding regions, nor is the choice of parcellation granularity (Brodmann vs. HCP) justified. Table I mixes anatomical regions, named pathways, and functional networks at different levels of abstraction, and several regions appear under multiple functions (e.g., DLPFC under both Decision-making and Reasoning) without an explanation of how overlaps are resolved. These choices are load-bearing because the paper's claim of brain-inspired grounding depends entirely on them.
  4. [Section III-B and Table II] The survey of 24 LLM-based agents uses checkmarks to label capabilities, but no explicit criteria for a capability being present are given, and the final row of Table II marks all ten columns for the proposed 'brain-inspired agent' without any system to back the entries. This comparison cannot establish that current agents are insufficient for AGI or that the proposed architecture would generalize where they do not. A benchmark or at least a formal insufficiency argument is needed before the table can be used as evidence for the central claim.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] The text refers to 'Chapter II,' 'Chapter III-A,' and 'Chapter IV'; these should be 'Section' in a journal article.
  2. [References] References [10] and [18] are duplicates, both citing the same GPT pre-training paper; one should be removed or replaced with the intended source.
  3. [Table I] The network names in Table I (e.g., 'Prefrontal Cortex-Motor Cortex Network') are not defined or explained in the body text, making the table difficult to interpret.
  4. [Figure 1] Figure 1 is described only as a 'Schematic Diagram of Brain Regions,' and the caption does not explain the symbols or connections; the figure should be self-contained or referenced in detail.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the paper is a position/architecture proposal with no fitted parameters, predictions, or derivations to recycle.

full rationale

The paper proposes a brain-inspired AI agent by mapping cortical regions to functional modules (e.g., V1 to CNN/YOLO, PFC to LLMs) and simplifying functional connectivity networks to interactions among these nodes. It does not derive a quantitative result, fit parameters, or evaluate predictions against data. The central claim that implementing these structures 'enables it to achieve basic cognitive intelligence akin to human capabilities' is an unsupported conjecture, but unsupportedness is not circularity: there is no derived quantity that was inserted as an input, no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing self-citation chain forcing the conclusion. The paper's own Section IV concedes major limitations, including insufficient definition of the architecture and neglect of subcortical circuits, which further confirms that the contribution is a conceptual proposal rather than a closed derivation. Because the paper makes no empirical or mathematical derivation, there is no reduction of conclusions to premises by construction, and the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted because there is no quantitative model or experiment. The central claim rests entirely on unvalidated domain assumptions: that brain parcellations map cleanly onto AI modules and that simplified connectivity is sufficient for cognition. These assumptions are acknowledged as limitations in Section IV but are not tested.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Cortical parcellations such as Brodmann and HCP define functionally separable modules suitable for agent design.
    Invoked in Sections II-B and III-A as the foundation for converting brain regions into functional nodes.
  • domain assumption Each cortical region's function can be approximated by an existing AI module such as an LLM, VLM, or CNN.
    Assumed in Section III-A through examples: V1 as CNN/YOLO and PFC as an LLM.
  • domain assumption Simplified functional connectivity networks between module nodes preserve enough brain function to yield cognitive behavior.
    Assumed in Sections II-B3 and III-A when complex brain connectivity is reduced to a small table of pathways.
  • ad hoc to paper Node activation based on task type and connectivity will produce general task handling.
    Introduced in Section III-A as 'an activation state for each functional node' but never specified or tested.
invented entities (1)
  • Brain-inspired agent architecture with cortical-area functional nodes
    purpose: Achieve human-like general cognitive intelligence by mapping brain regions to software modules and simplified connectivity.
    Proposed in Sections I and III-A with no implementation, experiment, or falsifiable prediction, so there is no independent evidence.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Brain-inspired AI Agent: The Way Towards AGI." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GQ5UGKEE

@misc{pith2026241208875,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Brain-inspired AI Agent: The Way Towards AGI},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GQ5UGKEE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.08875}
}
read the original abstract

Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), widely regarded as the fundamental goal of artificial intelligence, represents the realization of cognitive capabilities that enable the handling of general tasks with human-like proficiency. Researchers in brain-inspired AI seek inspiration from the operational mechanisms of the human brain, aiming to replicate its functional rules in intelligent models. Moreover, with the rapid development of large-scale models in recent years, the concept of agents has garnered increasing attention, with researchers widely recognizing it as a necessary pathway toward achieving AGI. In this article, we propose the concept of a brain-inspired AI agent and analyze how to extract relatively feasible and agent-compatible cortical region functionalities and their associated functional connectivity networks from the complex mechanisms of the human brain. Implementing these structures within an agent enables it to achieve basic cognitive intelligence akin to human capabilities. Finally, we explore the limitations and challenges for realizing brain-inspired agents and discuss their future development.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.08875 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic Diagram of Brain Regions in a Brain-Inspired Agent. intelligence features that current agents aim to achieve. Based on the above functions, we identified the main cortical areas of the brain associated with these functions as functional nodes within the brain-inspired agent. Additionally, we sim￾plified the corresponding functional connectivity networks, restricting interactions solely to the existing func… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Why we don’t have agi yet,

    P. V oss and M. Jovanovic, “Why we don’t have agi yet,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2308.03598

    arXiv 2023

  2. [2]

    Proposal for the dartmouth summer research project on artificial intelligence,

    J. McCarthy, M. Minsky, N. Rochester, and C. Shannon, “Proposal for the dartmouth summer research project on artificial intelligence,” Unpublished Manuscript, Dartmouth College Archives, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA, 1956. [Online]. Available: https://en.wikipedia. org/wiki/Dartmouth workshop

    1956

  3. [3]

    Roland and P

    A. Roland and P. Shiman, Strategic Computing: DARPA and the Quest for Machine Intelligence . Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 2002

    2002

  4. [4]

    Gps, a program that simulates human thought,

    A. Newell and H. A. Simon, “Gps, a program that simulates human thought,” in Computers and Thought , E. Feigenbaum and J. Feldman, Eds. New York, NY , USA: McGraw-Hill, 1961, pp. 279–293

    1961

  5. [5]

    Motooka, Ed., Fifth Generation Computer Systems: Proceedings of the International Conference on Fifth Generation Computer Systems, Tokyo, Japan, October 19-22, 1981

    T. Motooka, Ed., Fifth Generation Computer Systems: Proceedings of the International Conference on Fifth Generation Computer Systems, Tokyo, Japan, October 19-22, 1981 . Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland Publishing Company, 1982

    1981

  6. [6]

    Backpropaga- tion applied to handwritten zip code recognition,

    Y . LeCun, B. Boser, J. S. Denker, D. Henderson, R. E. Howard, W. Hubbard, and L. D. Jackel, “Backpropaga- tion applied to handwritten zip code recognition,” Neural Computation, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 541–551, 1989

    1989

  7. [7]

    Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks,

    A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton, “Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks,” Commun. ACM , vol. 60, no. 6, p. 84–90, May 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3065386

    doi:10.1145/3065386 2017

  8. [8]

    Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks,

    I. Sutskever, O. Vinyals, and Q. V . Le, “Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , vol. 27, 2014, pp. 3104–3112

    2014

Show all 91 references
  1. [9]

    BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding,

    J. Devlin, M.-W. Chang, K. Lee, and K. Toutanova, “BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding,” in Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologi...

    2019

  2. [11]

    The dartmouth college artificial intelligence conference: The next fifty years,

    J. Moor, “The dartmouth college artificial intelligence conference: The next fifty years,” AI Magazine, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 87–91, 2006. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ abs/10.1609/aimag.v27i4.1911

    2006 doi

  3. [12]

    Hawkins and S

    J. Hawkins and S. Blakeslee, On Intelligence . New 6 York, NY , USA: Henry Holt and Co., 2004

    2004

  4. [13]

    Everitt and M

    T. Everitt and M. Hutter, Universal Artificial Intelligence. Cham: Springer International Pub- lishing, 2018, pp. 15–46. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64816-3 2

    2018 doi

  5. [14]

    Goertzel and P

    B. Goertzel and P. Wang, Eds., Advances in Artificial General Intelligence: Concepts, Architectures and Algo- rithms. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press, 2007

    2007

  6. [15]

    Intelligent agents: theory and practice,

    M. Wooldridge and N. R. Jennings, “Intelligent agents: theory and practice,” The Knowledge Engineering Re- view, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 115–152, 1995

    1995

  7. [16]

    Sparks of artificial general intelligence: Early experiments with gpt-4,

    S. Bubeck, V . Chandrasekaran, R. Eldan, J. A. Gehrke, E. Horvitz, E. Kamar, P. Lee, Y . T. Lee, Y .-F. Li, S. M. Lundberg, H. Nori, H. Palangi, M. T. Ribeiro, and Y . Zhang, “Sparks of artificial general intelligence: Early experiments with gpt-4,” ArXiv, vol. abs/2303.12712,...

    2023 arXiv

  8. [17]

    Formalizing properties of agents,

    R. Goodwin, “Formalizing properties of agents,” USA, Tech. Rep., 1993

    1993

  9. [18]

    Improving language understanding by generative pre-training,

    A. Radford and K. Narasimhan, “Improving language understanding by generative pre-training,”

  10. [19]

    End to end learning for self-driving cars,

    M. Bojarski, D. W. del Testa, D. Dworakowski, B. Firner, B. Flepp, P. Goyal, L. D. Jackel, M. Monfort, U. Muller, J. Zhang, X. Zhang, J. Zhao, and K. Zieba, “End to end learning for self-driving cars,” ArXiv, vol. abs/1604.07316, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://api.semantic...

    2016 arXiv

  11. [20]

    Available: https://api.semanticscholar

    [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar. org/CorpusID:49313245

  12. [21]

    Mastering the game of go with deep neural networks and tree search,

    D. Silver, A. Huang, C. J. Maddison, A. Guez, L. Sifre, G. van den Driessche, J. Schrittwieser, I. Antonoglou, V . Panneershelvam, M. Lanctot, S. Dieleman, D. Grewe, J. Nham, N. Kalchbrenner, I. Sutskever, T. P. Lillicrap, M. Leach, K. Kavukcuoglu, T. Graepel, and D. Hassabis,...

  13. [22]

    Deep reinforcement learning for autonomous driving: A survey,

    B. R. Kiran, I. Sobh, V . Talpaert, P. Mannion, A. A. A. Sallab, S. Yogamani, and P. P ´erez, “Deep reinforcement learning for autonomous driving: A survey,” IEEE Trans- actions on Intelligent Transportation Systems , vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 4909–4926, 2022

    2022

  14. [23]

    Sim-to-real transfer in deep reinforcement learning for robotics: a survey,

    W. Zhao, J. P. Queralta, and T. Westerlund, “Sim-to-real transfer in deep reinforcement learning for robotics: a survey,” in 2020 IEEE Symposium Series on Computa- tional Intelligence (SSCI) , 2020, pp. 737–744

    2020

  15. [24]

    Multi-agent system and reinforcement learning approach for distributed intelligence in a flexible smart manufacturing system,

    Y . G. Kim, S. Lee, J. Son, H. Bae, and B. D. Chung, “Multi-agent system and reinforcement learning approach for distributed intelligence in a flexible smart manufacturing system,” Journal of Manufacturing Systems, vol. 57, pp. 440–450, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.s...

    2020

  16. [25]

    Stern, Multi-Agent Path Finding – An Overview

    R. Stern, Multi-Agent Path Finding – An Overview . Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 96–115. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-030-33274-7 6

    2019

  17. [26]

    A brain-inspired theory of mind spiking neural network improves multi-agent cooperation and competition,

    Z. Zhao, F. Zhao, Y . Zhao, Y . Zeng, and Y . Sun, “A brain-inspired theory of mind spiking neural network improves multi-agent cooperation and competition,” Patterns, vol. 4, 2023. [Online]. Available: https: //api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:259256823

    2023

  18. [27]

    Geomatic approaches for modeling land change scenarios,

    M. T. C. Olmedo, M. Paegelow, J.-F. Mas, and F. Escobar, “Geomatic approaches for modeling land change scenarios,” Geomatic Approaches for Modeling Land Change Scenarios , 2018. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:134145688

    2018

  19. [28]

    Agents thinking fast and slow: A talker-reasoner architecture,

    K. Christakopoulou, S. Mourad, and M. Matari ´c, “Agents thinking fast and slow: A talker-reasoner architecture,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv. org/abs/2410.08328

    2024 arXiv

  20. [29]

    Coupling visual semantics of artificial neural networks and human brain function via synchronized activations,

    L. Zhao, H. Dai, Z. Wu, Z. Xiao, L. Zhang, D. Liu, X. Hu, X. Jiang, S. Li, D. Zhu, and T. Liu, “Coupling visual semantics of artificial neural networks and human brain function via synchronized activations,” IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems , vol. 16, p...

    2022

  21. [30]

    Coupling artificial neurons in bert and biological neurons in the human brain,

    X. Liu, M. Zhou, G. Shi, Y . Du, L. Zhao, Z. Wu, D. Liu, T. Liu, and X. Hu, “Coupling artificial neurons in bert and biological neurons in the human brain,” Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 8888–8896, Jun. 2023. [Online]. Avail...

    2023

  22. [31]

    A unified and biologically-plausible relational graph representation of vision transformers,

    Y . Chen, Y . Du, Z. Xiao, L. Zhao, L. Zhang, D. Liu, D. Zhu, T. Zhang, X. Hu, T. Liu, and X. Jiang, “A unified and biologically-plausible relational graph representation of vision transformers,” IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems , vol. PP,

  23. [32]

    Complexity in a brain-inspired agent-based model,

    K. E. Joyce, P. J. Laurienti, and S. Hayasaka, “Complexity in a brain-inspired agent-based model,” Neural Networks, vol. 33, pp. 275–290, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S0893608012001578

    2012

  24. [33]

    Bi avan: Brain inspired adversarial visual attention network,

    H. Huang, L. Zhao, X. Hu, H. Dai, L. Zhang, D. Zhu, and T. Liu, “Bi avan: Brain inspired adversarial visual attention network,” ArXiv, vol. abs/2210.15790,

    arXiv

  25. [34]

    Spiking neural net- works,

    S. Ghosh-Dastidar and H. Adeli, “Spiking neural net- works,” International Journal of Neural Systems, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 295–308, August 2009

    2009

  26. [35]

    Graph structure of neural networks,

    J. You, J. Leskovec, K. He, and S. Xie, “Graph structure of neural networks,” in Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning , ser. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, H. D. III and A. Singh, Eds., vol. 119. PMLR, 13– 18 Jul 2020, pp. 10 881–10 8...

    2020

  27. [36]

    When brain-inspired ai meets agi,

    L. Zhao, L. Zhang, Z. Wu, Y . Chen, H. Dai, X. Yu, Z. Liu, T. Zhang, X. Hu, X. Jiang, X. Li, D. Zhu, D. Shen, and T. Liu, “When brain-inspired ai meets agi,” Meta-Radiology, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 100005, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii...

    2023

  28. [37]

    Comparing brain networks of different size and connectivity density using graph theory,

    B. C. M. van Wijk, C. J. Stam, and A. Daffertshofer, “Comparing brain networks of different size and connectivity density using graph theory,” PLOS ONE , vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 1–13, 10 2010. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013701

    2010 doi

  29. [38]

    Available: https://api.semanticscholar

    [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar. org/CorpusID:253223845

  30. [39]

    You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection,

    J. Redmon, S. Divvala, R. Girshick, and A. Farhadi, “You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection,”

  31. [40]

    Braincog: A spiking neural network based, brain-inspired cognitive intelligence engine for brain-inspired ai and brain simulation,

    Y . Zeng, D. Zhao, F. Zhao, G. Shen, Y . Dong, E. Lu, Q. Zhang, Y . Sun, Q. Liang, Y . Zhao, Z. Zhao, H. Fang, Y . Wang, Y . Li, X. Liu, C. Du, Q. Kong, 7 Z. Ruan, and W. Bi, “Braincog: A spiking neural network based, brain-inspired cognitive intelligence engine for brain-insp...

    2023

  32. [41]

    Basic neural units of the brain: Neurons, synapses and action potential,

    J. Zhang, “Basic neural units of the brain: Neurons, synapses and action potential,” arXiv: Neurons and Cognition , 2019. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:174799219

    2019

  33. [42]

    Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems,

    E. T. Bullmore and O. Sporns, “Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience , vol. 10, pp. 186–198, 2009. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:205504722

    2009

  34. [43]

    Small- world human brain networks: Perspectives and challenges,

    X. Liao, A. V . Vasilakos, and Y . He, “Small- world human brain networks: Perspectives and challenges,” Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews , vol. 77, pp. 286–300, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:13001431

    2017

  35. [44]

    Vergleichende lokalisationslehre der großhirnrinde : in ihren prinzipien dargestellt auf grund des zellenbaues,

    K. Brodmann, “Vergleichende lokalisationslehre der großhirnrinde : in ihren prinzipien dargestellt auf grund des zellenbaues,” 1985. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:142722366

    1985

  36. [45]

    Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1506

    [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1506. 02640

  37. [46]

    The human brainnetome atlas: A new brain atlas based on connectional architecture,

    L. Fan, H. Li, J. Zhuo, Y . Zhang, J. Wang, L. Chen, Z. Yang, C. Chu, S. Xie, A. R. Laird, P. T. Fox, S. B. Eickhoff, C. Yu, and T. Jiang, “The human brainnetome atlas: A new brain atlas based on connectional architecture,” Cerebral Cortex (New York, NY), vol. 26, pp. 3508 – 3...

    2016

  38. [47]

    Computational models of cognitive control,

    R. C. O’Reilly, S. A. Herd, and W. M. Pauli, “Computational models of cognitive control,” Current Opinion in Neurobiology , vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 257–261, 2010, cognitive neuroscience. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S0959438810000097

    2010

  39. [48]

    Frontal lobe and cognitive development,

    J. M. Fuster, “Frontal lobe and cognitive development,” Brain Research Bulletin , vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 367–370, March 2002

    2002

  40. [49]

    The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks

    M. D. Fox, A. Z. Snyder, J. L. Vincent, M. Corbetta, D. C. V . Essen, and M. E. Raichle, “The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , vol. 102 27...

    2005

  41. [50]

    Human connectomics,

    T. E. Behrens and O. Sporns, “Human connectomics,” Current Opinion in Neurobiology , vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 144–153, 2012, neurotechnology. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S0959438811001449

    2012

  42. [51]

    A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex,

    M. F. Glasser, T. S. Coalson, E. C. Robinson, C. D. Hacker, J. W. Harwell, E. Yacoub, K. U ˘gurbil, J. L. R. Andersson, C. F. Beckmann, M. Jenkinson, S. M. Smith, and D. C. V . Essen, “A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex,” Nature, vol. 536, pp. 171 – 178, 2016....

    2016

  43. [52]

    An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function,

    E. K. Miller and J. D. Cohen, “An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function,” Annual Review of Neu- roscience, vol. 24, no. V olume 24, 2001, pp. 167–202,

    2001

  44. [53]

    Neurodegenerative diseases target large-scale human brain networks,

    W. W. Seeley, R. K. Crawford, J. Zhou, B. L. Miller, and M. D. Greicius, “Neurodegenerative diseases target large-scale human brain networks,” Neuron, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 42–52, 2009. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S0896627309002499

    2009

  45. [54]

    Correspondence of the brain’s functional architecture during activation and rest,

    S. M. Smith, P. T. Fox, K. L. Miller, D. C. Glahn, P. M. Fox, C. E. Mackay, N. Filippini, K. E. Watkins, R. Toro, A. R. Laird, and C. F. Beckmann, “Correspondence of the brain’s functional architecture during activation and rest,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science...

    2009

  46. [55]

    Russell and P

    S. Russell and P. Norvig, Artificial Intelligence: A Mod- ern Approach, 3rd ed. USA: Prentice Hall Press, 2009

    2009

  47. [56]

    Circuitry of primate prefrontal cortex and regulation of behavior by representational memory,

    P. S. Goldman-Rakic, “Circuitry of primate prefrontal cortex and regulation of behavior by representational memory,” in Handbook of Physiology: The Nervous System: Higher Functions of the Brain , F. Plum, Ed. Bethesda, MD, USA: American Physiological Society, 1987, vol. V , pp...

    1987

  48. [57]

    Generating executable action plans with environmentally-aware language mod- els,

    M. Gramopadhye and D. Szafir, “Generating executable action plans with environmentally-aware language mod- els,” in 2023 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) , 2023, pp. 3568– 3575

    2023

  49. [58]

    Mapping the structural core of human cerebral cortex,

    P. Hagmann, L. Cammoun, X. Gigandet, R. Meuli, C. J. Honey, V . J. Wedeen, and O. Sporns, “Mapping the structural core of human cerebral cortex,” PLOS Biology, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 1–15, 07 2008. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0060159

    2008 doi

  50. [59]

    The brain’s default network: Anatomy, function, and relevance to disease,

    R. Buckner, J. Andrews-Hanna, and D. Schacter, “The brain’s default network: Anatomy, function, and relevance to disease,”Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, no. 1124, pp. 1–38, 2008. [Online]. Available: http://www.nyas.org/Publications/Annals/Default.aspx

    2008

  51. [60]

    The hitchhiker’s guide to program analysis: A journey with large language models,

    H. Li, Y . Hao, Y . Zhai, and Z. Qian, “The hitchhiker’s guide to program analysis: A journey with large language models,” ArXiv, vol. abs/2308.00245, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:260351308

    2023 arXiv

  52. [61]

    Emergent autonomous scientific research capabilities of large language models,

    D. A. Boiko, R. MacKnight, and G. Gomes, “Emergent autonomous scientific research capabilities of large language models,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https: //arxiv.org/abs/2304.05332

    2023 arXiv

  53. [62]

    Augmenting large language models with chemistry tools,

    A. M. Bran, S. Cox, O. Schilter, C. Baldassari, A. White, and P. Schwaller, “Augmenting large language models with chemistry tools,” in NeurIPS 2023 AI for Science Workshop , 2023. [Online]. Available: https://openreview.net/forum?id=wdGIL6lx3l

    2023

  54. [63]

    Language models as zero-shot planners: Extracting actionable knowledge for embodied agents,

    W. Huang, P. Abbeel, D. Pathak, and I. Mordatch, “Language models as zero-shot planners: Extracting actionable knowledge for embodied agents,” in Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Machine Learning , ser. Proceedings of Machine 8 Learning Research, K. Chaudhur...

    2022

  55. [64]

    Describe, explain, plan and select: Interactive planning with llms enables open-world multi-task agents,

    Z. Wang, S. Cai, G. Chen, A. Liu, X. S. Ma, and Y . Liang, “Describe, explain, plan and select: Interactive planning with llms enables open-world multi-task agents,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , A. Oh, T. Naumann, A. Globerson, K. Saenko, M. Hardt, an...

    2023

  56. [65]

    Webshop: Towards scalable real-world web interaction with grounded language agents,

    S. Yao, H. Chen, J. Yang, and K. Narasimhan, “Webshop: Towards scalable real-world web interaction with grounded language agents,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , S. Koyejo, S. Mohamed, A. Agarwal, D. Belgrave, K. Cho, and A. Oh, Eds., vol. 35. Curran As...

    2022

  57. [66]

    Towards autonomous testing agents via conversational large language models,

    R. Feldt, S. Kang, J. Yoon, and S. Yoo, “Towards autonomous testing agents via conversational large language models,” 2023 38th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) , pp. 1688–1693, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://api. semanticscholar.or...

    2023

  58. [67]

    Plan4mc: Skill reinforcement learning and planning for open-world minecraft tasks,

    H. Yuan, C. Zhang, H. Wang, F. Xie, P. Cai, H. Dong, and Z. Lu, “Plan4mc: Skill reinforcement learning and planning for open-world minecraft tasks,” ArXiv, vol. abs/2303.16563, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:257805102

    2023 arXiv

  59. [68]

    Plan, eliminate, and track - language models are good teachers for embodied agents,

    Y . Wu, S. Y . Min, Y . Bisk, R. Salakhutdinov, A. Azaria, Y .-F. Li, T. M. Mitchell, and S. Prabhumoye, “Plan, eliminate, and track - language models are good teachers for embodied agents,” ArXiv, vol. abs/2305.02412,

    arXiv

  60. [69]

    A real-world webagent with planning, long context understanding, and program synthesis,

    I. Gur, H. Furuta, A. V . Huang, M. Safdari, Y . Matsuo, D. Eck, and A. Faust, “A real-world webagent with planning, long context understanding, and program synthesis,” in The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations , 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ope...

    2024

  61. [70]

    Chatmof: An autonomous ai system for predicting and generating metal- organic frameworks,

    Y . S. Kang and J. Kim, “Chatmof: An autonomous ai system for predicting and generating metal- organic frameworks,” ArXiv, vol. abs/2308.01423,

    arXiv

  62. [71]

    Multimodal web navigation with instruction-finetuned foundation models,

    H. Furuta, K.-H. Lee, O. Nachum, Y . Matsuo, A. Faust, S. S. Gu, and I. Gur, “Multimodal web navigation with instruction-finetuned foundation models,” in The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations ,

  63. [72]

    Language models can solve computer tasks,

    G. Kim, P. Baldi, and S. McAleer, “Language models can solve computer tasks,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , A. Oh, T. Naumann, A. Globerson, K. Saenko, M. Hardt, and S. Levine, Eds., vol. 36. Curran Associates, Inc., 2023, pp. 39 648–39 677. [Online]. ...

    2023

  64. [73]

    V oyager: An open-ended embodied agent with large language models,

    G. Wang, Y . Xie, Y . Jiang, A. Mandlekar, C. Xiao, Y . Zhu, L. J. Fan, and A. Anandkumar, “V oyager: An open-ended embodied agent with large language models,” Trans. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 2024, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:258887849

    2024

  65. [74]

    Do embodied agents dream of pixelated sheep?: Embodied decision making using language guided world modelling,

    K. Nottingham, P. Ammanabrolu, A. Suhr, Y . Choi, H. Hajishirzi, S. Singh, and R. Fox, “Do embodied agents dream of pixelated sheep?: Embodied decision making using language guided world modelling,” in International Conference on Machine Learning ,

  66. [75]

    Available: https://api.semanticscholar

    [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar. org/CorpusID:256389514

  67. [76]

    Self-contrast: Better reflection through inconsistent solving perspectives,

    W. Zhang, Y . Shen, L. Wu, Q. Peng, J. Wang, Y . Zhuang, and W. Lu, “Self-contrast: Better reflection through inconsistent solving perspectives,” in Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , L.-W. Ku, A. M...

    2024

  68. [77]

    Towards uncertainty-aware language agent,

    J. Han, W. Buntine, and E. Shareghi, “Towards uncertainty-aware language agent,” in Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024, L.-W. Ku, A. Martins, and V . Srikumar, Eds. Bangkok, Thailand: Association for Computational Linguistics, Aug. 2024, pp. 66...

    2024

  69. [78]

    Available: https://api.semanticscholar

    [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar. org/CorpusID:258480064

  70. [79]

    Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks,

    P. Lewis, E. Perez, A. Piktus, F. Petroni, V . Karpukhin, N. Goyal, H. K ¨uttler, M. Lewis, W. tau Yih, T. Rockt ¨aschel, S. Riedel, and D. Kiela, “Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS)...

    2020

  71. [80]

    Interact: Exploring the potentials of chatgpt as a cooperative agent,

    P.-L. Chen and C.-S. Chang, “Interact: Exploring the potentials of chatgpt as a cooperative agent,” ArXiv, vol. abs/2308.01552, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:260438734

    2023 arXiv

  72. [81]

    Apprenticeship learning via inverse reinforcement learning,

    P. Abbeel and A. Y . Ng, “Apprenticeship learning via inverse reinforcement learning,” in Proceedings of the Twenty-first International Conference on Machine Learn- ing (ICML). ACM, 2004, pp. 1–8

    2004

  73. [84]

    Synapse: Trajectory-as-exemplar prompting with memory for computer control,

    L. Zheng, R. Wang, X. Wang, and B. An, “Synapse: Trajectory-as-exemplar prompting with memory for computer control,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https: //arxiv.org/abs/2306.07863

    2024 arXiv

  74. [85]

    Mind2web: Towards a generalist agent for the web,

    X. Deng, Y . Gu, B. Zheng, S. Chen, S. Stevens, B. Wang, H. Sun, and Y . Su, “Mind2web: Towards a generalist agent for the web,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.06070

    2023 arXiv

  75. [86]

    Agent- pro: Learning to evolve via policy-level reflection and optimization,

    W. Zhang, K. Tang, H. Wu, M. Wang, Y . Shen, G. Hou, Z. Tan, P. Li, Y . Zhuang, and W. Lu, “Agent- pro: Learning to evolve via policy-level reflection and optimization,” in Proceedings of the 62nd Annual 9 Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Lon...

    2024

  76. [90]

    Osworld: Benchmarking multimodal agents for open-ended tasks in real computer environments,

    T. Xie, D. Zhang, J. Chen, X. Li, S. Zhao, R. Cao, T. J. Hua, Z. Cheng, D. Shin, F. Lei, Y . Liu, Y . Xu, S. Zhou, S. Savarese, C. Xiong, V . Zhong, and T. Yu, “Osworld: Benchmarking multimodal agents for open-ended tasks in real computer environments,” ArXiv, vol. abs/2404.07...

    2024 arXiv

  77. [92]

    R. S. Sutton and A. G. Barto, Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction . Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 1998

    1998

  78. [2001]

    Available: https://www.annualreviews

    [Online]. Available: https://www.annualreviews. org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167

    doi

  79. [2016]

    Available: https://api.semanticscholar

    [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar. org/CorpusID:515925

  80. [2022]

    Available: https://api.semanticscholar

    [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar. org/CorpusID:249926529

  81. [2023]

    Available: https://api.semanticscholar

    [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar. org/CorpusID:260438479

  82. [2024]

    Available: https://openreview.net/forum? id=efFmBWioSc

    [Online]. Available: https://openreview.net/forum? id=efFmBWioSc

  83. [5375]

    Available: https://aclanthology.org/2024

    [Online]. Available: https://aclanthology.org/2024. acl-long.292

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.