Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 48 references

Emergent facilitation by random constraints in a facilitated random walk model of glass

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A lattice model with no energetic interactions and no explicit facilitation rule reproduces stretched-exponential relaxation and emergent mobile groups of particles, showing that glassy dynamics can arise purely from reversible random…

desk verdict A genuinely new lattice model of glass with reversible rate resampling, worth refereeing despite the ergodicity argument being heuristic. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.08986 v3 pith:BB6MNJSE submitted 2024-12-12 cond-mat.stat-mech

Leo S.I. Lam , Hai-Yao Deng , Wei-Bing Zhang , Udoka Nwankwo , Chu Xiao , Cho-Tung Yip , Chun-Shing Lee , Haihui Ruan
show 1 more author
Chi-Hang Lam
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mech PACS 05.40.Fb64.70.Q
keywords glasstransitionkineticallyconstrainedmodelsdynamicalfacilitationemergentstretchedexponentialrelaxationheterogeneitylatticemodelrandomwalk
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces the facilitated random walk (FRW), a one-dimensional lattice model in which particles hop with rates that are randomly blocked with probability $1-q$, and the rates are resampled whenever another particle crosses the same bond, with a reversed hop exactly restoring the previous rates. The model has no energetic interactions and no imposed facilitation rule, yet simulations show the classic signatures of glass: subdiffusive plateaus in the mean square displacement, stretched exponential relaxation with a stretching exponent $\beta$ that drops as $q$ decreases, and dynamical heterogeneity. The central claim is that facilitation is emergent: particles trapped in small wells can form mobile groups of a dominant size $m^*$ that grows as the constraints tighten, and these groups traverse the lattice, repeatedly untrapping others. The authors argue that because all hops are reversible, temporary inhibition by resampling is subdominant to facilitation, which opens new configurations. If this is right, reversible random kinetic constraints alone are sufficient to generate glassy dynamics, and the FRW provides a computationally cheap, defect-level coarse-graining of the distinguishable-particle lattice model.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the hop-triggered rate resampling with exact restoration: each bond carries, for every particle, a hopping rate that is $w_0$ with probability $q$ and $0$ otherwise; a hop of any particle across a bond resamples the rates of all other particles on that bond, and a reversed hop restores the prior rates. This converts what looks like quenched disorder into randomness quenched in configuration space, and couples particles without any energetic interaction. The emergent objects that carry the facilitation argument are the mobile groups of the dominant size $m^*$: overlapping traps allow particles to repeatedly lift each other's barriers, and the group size increases as $q$ decreases, paralleling the imposed facilitation threshold in the FA model, a standard kinetically constrained spin model. The practical implementation rests on a memoryless rate-restoration algorithm using 64-bit internal states $(\Psi_k, \Phi_{ij})$ advanced by reversible congruential updates that keep the inner product $\Psi_k^T \Phi_{ij}$ invariant, so all rates are regenerated on demand rather than stored.

What would settle it

For fixed $q$ and density $\rho$, simulate the FRW on lattices of increasing size $L$ from uniformly random initial configurations and measure the fraction of runs that remain fully trapped forever; the paper's ergodicity claim requires this fraction to vanish as $L$ grows, while a finite trapping fraction at large $L$ would falsify the equilibrium-statistics basis of the reported glassy relaxation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the FRW, the hopping rate $w_{ijk}(t)$ of particle $k$ across nearest-neighbor bond $ij$ equals $w_0$ with probability $q$ and $0$ otherwise, subject to detailed balance $w_{ijk} = w_{jik}$; after particle $k$ hops across $ij$, all other particles' rates on that bond are resampled, and after a reversed hop the old rates are restored exactly. The equilibrium is trivial — in large systems all particle arrangements are equally likely — and the dynamics are simulated by a rejection-free kinetic Monte Carlo algorithm whose memoryless rate restoration uses reversible congruential random number generators. Simulations show mean-square-displacement plateaus followed by diffusion, and self-intermediate scattering functions well fitted by Kohlrausch-Williams-Watts stretched exponentials, with $\beta$ decreasing from 0.86 to 0.37 as $q$ decreases from 0.8 to 0.3 at density $\rho = 0.8$. Isolated particles are confined to finite traps of mean size $W_{\rm trap} = 2/(1-q) - 1$, whereas groups of $m^*$ particles remain mobile, with $m^* = 2$ at $q = 0.7$, $3$ at $q = 0.5$, and $4$ at $q = 0.35$. The paper concludes that facilitation is the emergent, predominant consequence of rate resampling, not inhibition, and that the model is a coarse-grained version of the distinguishable-particle lattice model, connecting defect-based and atomistic lattice descriptions of glass.

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on the unproven assumption that in a sufficiently large system mobile groups of the dominant size exist and traverse the whole lattice, so that the uniform equilibrium distribution assumed in the simulations is actually reached.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A generic random, reversible kinetic constraint, not a hand-picked facilitation rule, is enough to produce stretched-exponential relaxation with a density- and constraint-dependent $\beta$, so glassy slowdown in this model class requires no thermodynamic driving force.
  • The dominant mobile group size $m^*$ plays the role of the facilitation threshold in kinetically constrained models; because $m^*$ is emergent, deterministic facilitation rules can be viewed as compressed descriptions of reversible resampling dynamics.
  • Because FRW particles represent defects (voids), the model's mean square displacement is comparable to particle-based measurements up to a constant factor, while its self-intermediate scattering function should be interpreted as a defect observable.
  • The FRW is argued to inherit many equilibrium dynamical properties of the DPLM at much lower computational cost, making quantities such as surface-enhanced mobility in glassy films accessible in one dimension.
  • The exact properties that the local random configuration-tree theory assumes only approximately — a tree structure of the configuration space and a bimodal distribution of hopping rates — hold exactly in the FRW, providing a direct testbed for that theory.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The 'facilitation predominates' claim suggests a direct measurement the paper does not report: the steady-state statistics of resampling events that lift a barrier (rate 0 to $w_0$) versus events that install one ($w_0$ to 0); the claim implies escapes from traps coincide with barrier-lifting events, and that a variant in which resampling only installs barriers should be permanently arrested.
  • The self-consistent ergodicity argument implies a sharp finite-size test: for fixed $q$ and $\rho$, the fraction of uniformly random initial configurations that remain fully trapped should vanish as lattice size $L$ grows, with crossover length set by the spacing of dominant mobile groups; measuring that crossover would probe the unproven mobility-transition assumption.
  • A natural extension is to let the unblocking probability $q$ become a spatially heterogeneous or time-dependent field (a temperature-like control), which would turn the FRW into a probe of aging, Kovacs-like memory, and surface effects within the same reversible framework.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces the facilitated random walk (FRW), a one-dimensional lattice model of glass in which particles perform continuous-time random walks with random, particle-specific kinetic constraints. The constraints are not quenched: when a particle hops across a bond, the hopping rates of all other particles across that bond are resampled (rate resampling), and if the same particle later makes the reversed hop, the previous rates are restored (rate restoration). The authors argue that this reversible rate-resampling rule produces emergent facilitation: particles form mobile groups of a dominant size m* that untrap one another, yielding stretched exponential relaxation, MSD plateaus, and dynamical heterogeneity typical of glasses. They further claim that, in the large-system limit, the model is ergodic with a flat equilibrium measure, so all particle arrangements are equally likely. The paper reports kinetic Monte Carlo simulations for several q and ρ, fits the self-intermediate scattering function to the Kohlrausch-Williams-Watts form, and presents a heuristic argument for m* and ergodicity. It positions the FRW as a coarse-grained defect-model analogue of the distinguishable particle lattice model (DPLM) and a more fundamental counterpart to the Fredrickson-Andersen model.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the FRW is a valuable minimal model: it exhibits glassy relaxation and dynamical facilitation without any explicit facilitation rule, with only reversible kinetic rate resampling. The exact trap-size formula (Eqs. 6-7) is a clean analytic result, and the reversible random-number implementation in Appendices A-B provides an exact, memory-efficient way to enforce rate restoration, with code made available. The proposed mapping between the FA model, the FRW, and the DPLM is conceptually suggestive and could help bridge defect-based and atomistic lattice descriptions of glass. However, the main physical conclusions depend on the existence and unbounded mobility of m* mobile groups, and the paper's ergodicity argument is heuristic rather than proven. The significance would be high if the ergodicity and mobility-transition claims are substantiated; as it stands, the qualitative simulation results are plausible but the theoretical foundation is incomplete.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. V, Ergodic property] The ergodicity claim is load-bearing: Section III states that the equilibrium measure is flat because the model is ergodic, and all simulations are initialized from that flat measure. The justification in Section V rests on two assertions that are not derived: (i) a dominant mobile group size m*(q) exists for every q>0 and ρ>0, and (ii) an initially present m* cluster traverses the whole lattice. The paper explicitly defers the quantitative analysis ('A quantitative study of these mobility transitions will be reported elsewhere') and does not report the exact two-particle mobility threshold it claims to have verified. Without a proof, or at least a systematic numerical demonstration (e.g., convergence from different initial conditions, absence of non-communicating components), the reported relaxations may be non-equilibrium or finite-size effects.
  2. [Sec. V, time-reversal argument] The argument that mobile groups survive permanently because a transition into a 'trapped state' would contradict time-reversal symmetry only rules out strictly absorbing states with zero available hops. It does not rule out closed communicating classes in which particles rattle within finite wells but can never escape to produce unbounded transport. If such rattling components have positive weight in the stationary ensemble, the flat position measure is not the unique stationary measure, and the global diffusivity and KWW relaxations could reflect a component-weighted average rather than a single ergodic component. The paper needs to exclude this possibility explicitly.
  3. [Sec. VI, predominance of facilitation] The claim that 'inhibitions are only temporary' is not justified by the model rules. Under rule (i), when particle k hops across bond ij, it resamples the rates of all other particles l across that bond; under rule (ii), those previous rates are restored only if the same particle k subsequently performs the exact reversed hop. If k instead diffuses away, the constraint it installed on l can persist indefinitely, until some other particle happens to cross that bond and resample it again. Thus the argument that inhibition is never permanent and only causes a minor slowdown is incomplete. The simulation evidence may support the predominance of facilitation in the studied regimes, but the stated mechanistic explanation in Sec. VI overreaches.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. IV, Fig. 5] The KWW fits are restricted to Fs < 0.9 and the q = 0.2 dataset is excluded because the system only slightly relaxes. Since stretched exponential relaxation is a central claim, the paper should report the fit ranges, the number of points used, and uncertainties in β and τ, and should state explicitly how the fits depend on the chosen lower cutoff in Fs.
  2. [Sec. III and Appendix A-B] The exact two-particle mobility threshold is mentioned as a validation test but is not reported. Providing this result, even as a brief appendix entry, would substantially strengthen confidence in the implementation and in the claimed mobility-transition phenomenology.
  3. [Sec. IV and Appendix C] All results are averaged over only two simulations. Given the strong trajectory-to-trajectory fluctuations visible in Figs. 2-3, the paper should report error bars or at least state the statistical uncertainty for the MSD, SISF, and diffusion coefficients.
  4. [Sec. II, Eq. (7)] The relationship between the mean trap distance strap and the trap size Wtrap is correct but the text is terse; a one-sentence derivation would help readers connect the geometric waiting-time argument to Eq. (7).
  5. [Throughout] There are several typographical issues, including 'coeffcient' in Sec. VI, inconsistent spacing in 'FR W', and the run-together phrase 'andomand' in the reference list. A careful proofread is recommended.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

The Sec. V ergodicity argument is self-consistent/circular but non-forcing; FRW glassy signals are direct simulation outputs, so no central claim reduces to a fit or self-citation chain.

  1. self definitional [Sec. III 'Equilibrium states and simulation algorithm' and Sec. V 'Facilitation mechanism and ergodicity', paragraphs on ergodicity]
    "Ergodicity of large FRW systems is assumed when deriving equilibrium statistics in Sec. III and this will now be justified self-consistently. We have explained in Sec. III that particles are randomly distributed with uniform probability at equilibrium, assuming ergodicity. Due to the random distribution, for any q >0 and ρ >0, a few sites with m∗ particles must exist initially in a sufficiently large system, where m∗ is the dominant mobile group size."

    The proof of ergodicity assumes the uniform random distribution whose validity is exactly what ergodicity was invoked to establish in Sec. III. The intermediate link—that m* mobile groups exist and 'some of them must be able to traverse over the whole lattice'—is asserted rather than derived, with the quantitative mobility-transition study deferred. Hence the equilibrium statistics and the ergodicity claim form a closed loop. The loop does not force the measured relaxation data, which are direct KMC outputs of the defined process from the stated initial state; it only supplies the equilibrium interpretation.

full rationale

Central FRW results (stretched exponential Fs, MSD plateaus, mobile-group statistics) are measurements of a well-defined kinetic Monte Carlo process with no fitted parameter needed to produce them; KWW fits are descriptive rather than predictive. The only circular step is the Sec. V 'self-consistent' justification of ergodicity, which uses the flat equilibrium distribution as its premise. This is genuine but mild and non-forcing: if the m* traversal claim fails, the simulations would describe a non-equilibrium or finite-size process, yet the reported glassy signatures would remain properties of that process. Self-citations to the DPLM and to the configuration-tree theory are motivational and comparative, not load-bearing for the FRW claims. No 'prediction' in the paper reduces by construction to an input, and no uniqueness or ansatz is imported via self-citation to force the model choice. Overall circularity score: 2.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The FRW model rests on a small set of postulates: symmetric rates, reversible resampling/restoration rules, and an ergodicity assumption. The model parameters q and ρ are chosen by hand and play the role of temperature and density. No additional physical entities beyond the model's own degrees of freedom are introduced; the internal states are algorithmic devices.

free parameters (2)
  • q (unblocking probability) = 0.2 to 0.8
    Model parameter chosen by hand; controls the density of available hopping paths and acts as a proxy for temperature. The central glassy behaviors are demonstrated by varying q, not by fitting it.
  • ρ (particle density) = 0.03 to 0.8
    Model parameter chosen by hand; controls particle spacing and the abundance of mobile groups. Different ρ values are used across figures to reveal facilitation.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Detailed balance: hopping rates are symmetric, w_ijk(t)=w_jik(t) (Eq. 2).
    Ensures reversibility and uniform equilibrium distribution; is a defining design choice rather than a derived result.
  • ad hoc to paper Rate resampling and rate restoration rules (Sec. II, items i-ii).
    Define the FRW model; the resampling rule creates dynamical interactions and the restoration rule enforces reversibility. Motivated by DPLM but postulated here without independent derivation.
  • ad hoc to paper Ergodicity of large FRW systems (Sec. V).
    Used to derive exact equilibrium statistics (all configurations equally likely). Argued self-consistently via existence of mobile m* groups, but not proven; the paper defers quantitative analysis to future work.
  • domain assumption q and ρ decrease with temperature (Sec. II, final paragraph).
    Interpretative assumption connecting the abstract model parameters to physical temperature, used to discuss Arrhenius behavior and glassiness.
  • domain assumption Particles represent voids/defects in a glass (Sec. II opening).
    Physical interpretation of the model; it is a defect model, so results are for defect dynamics, not atomic motion.
invented entities (1)
  • Fictitious internal states Ψ_k and Φ_ij
    purpose: Encode system history in expanded instantaneous states so that rate restoration can be implemented without storing full histories (Appendices A and B).
    Computational bookkeeping devices, not physical degrees of freedom. They carry no falsifiable physical prediction outside the model.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Emergent facilitation by random constraints in a facilitated random walk model of glass." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BB6MNJSE

@misc{pith2026241208986,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Emergent facilitation by random constraints in a facilitated random walk model of glass},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BB6MNJSE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.08986}
}
read the original abstract

The physics of glass has been a significant topic of interest for decades. Dynamical facilitation is widely believed to be an important characteristic of glassy dynamics, but the precise mechanism is still under debate. We propose a lattice model of glass called the facilitated random walk (FRW). Each particle performs continuous time random walk in the presence of its own random local kinetic constraints. The particles do not interact energetically. Instead, they interact kinetically with a hopping rate resampling rule under which motions of a particle can randomly perturb the local kinetic constraints of other particles. This dynamic interaction is reversible, following a rate restoration rule. A step-by-step reversal of the particle motions exactly restore the previous constraints, modeling randomness quenched in the configuration space of glass. The model exhibits stretched exponential relaxation and dynamical heterogeneity typical of glasses. Despite the lack of explicit facilitation rule, the FRW shows facilitation behaviors closely analogous to those of the kinetically constrained models (KCM). The FRW is a coarse-grained version of the distinguishable particle lattice model (DPLM) and this exemplifies that compatible defect and atomistic models can complement each other on the study of glass.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.08986 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. A schematic showing an example of system evolution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Position-time graphs of particles for lattice size [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. shows the MSD against time for different q and ρ = 0.8. At long time, the slopes of the lines in the log￾log plot is close to unity, indicating the diffusive regime. Subdiffusive plateaus, characteristic of glass, appear at intermediate time at low q. They indicate temporary trapping of particles either isolated or in small immo￾bile groups as described above. At long time, most mo￾mentarily trapped particles have b… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Self-intermediate scattering function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Stretching exponent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (a) Diffusion coefficient [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Particle MSD against time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. (a) Self-intermediate scattering function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Stretching exponent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Perspective: The glass transition,

    G. Biroli and J. P. Garrahan, “Perspective: The glass transition,” J. Chem. Phys. 138, 12A301 (2013)

    work page 2013

  2. [2]

    Glasses and aging, a statistical mechanics perspective on,

    F. Arceri, F.¸ cois P. Landes, L. Berthier, and G. Biroli, “Glasses and aging, a statistical mechanics perspective on,” in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (Springer, 2022) p. 229

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Dynamic relaxations and relaxation- property relationships in metallic glasses,

    W. H. Wang, “Dynamic relaxations and relaxation- property relationships in metallic glasses,” Progress in Materials Science 106, 100561 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Ultrastable glasses: new perspectives for an old problem,

    C. Rodriguez-Tinoco, M. Gonzalez-Silveira, M. A. Ramos, and J. Rodriguez-Viejo, “Ultrastable glasses: new perspectives for an old problem,” La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento 45, 325 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Zaccone, Theory of Disordered Solids : From Atom- istic Dynamics to Mechanical, Vibrational, and Thermal Properties (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2023)

    A. Zaccone, Theory of Disordered Solids : From Atom- istic Dynamics to Mechanical, Vibrational, and Thermal Properties (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2023)

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Solid-that-flows picture of glass-forming liq- uids,

    J. C. Dyre, “Solid-that-flows picture of glass-forming liq- uids,” J. Phys. Chem. Letters 15, 1603 (2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    To- ward atomic-scale understanding of structure-dynamics- properties relations for metallic glasses,

    Zhen-Ya Zhou, Qun Yang, and Hai-Bin Yu, “To- ward atomic-scale understanding of structure-dynamics- properties relations for metallic glasses,” Progress in Ma- terials Science 145, 101311 (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Molecular dynamics simulations of glassy polymers,

    J.-L. Barrat, J¨ org Baschnagel, and A. Lyulin, “Molecular dynamics simulations of glassy polymers,” Soft Matter 6, 3430 (2010)

    work page 2010

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    Computer simulations of the glass transition and glassy materials,

    J.-L. Barrat and L. Berthier, “Computer simulations of the glass transition and glassy materials,” Comptes Ren- dus. Physique 24, 57 (2023)

    2023

  2. [10]

    Plischke and B

    M. Plischke and B. Bergersen, Equilibrium statistical physics (World Scientific, 1994)

    1994

  3. [11]

    A-L Barab´ asi and H. E. Stanley,Fractal concepts in sur- face growth (Cambridge university press, 1995)

    1995

  4. [12]

    Kineti- cally constrained models,

    J. P. Garrahan, P. Sollich, and C. Toninelli, “Kineti- cally constrained models,” in Dynamical Heterogeneities in Glasses, Colloids and Granular Media, edited by L. Berthier, G. Biroli, J.-P. Bouchaud, L. Cipelletti, and W. van Saarloosand (Oxford University Press, 2011)

    2011

  5. [13]

    Glassy dynamics of kinetically constrained models,

    F. Ritort and P. Sollich, “Glassy dynamics of kinetically constrained models,” Adv. Phys. 52, 219 (2003)

    2003

  6. [14]

    Kinetic ising model of the glass transition,

    G. H. Fredrickson and H. C. Andersen, “Kinetic ising model of the glass transition,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1244 (1984)

    1984

  7. [15]

    Facilitated ki- netic ising models and the glass transition,

    G. H. Fredrickson and H. C. Andersen, “Facilitated ki- netic ising models and the glass transition,” J. Chem. Phys. 83, 5822 (1985)

    1985

  8. [16]

    Models of hierarchically constrained dynamics for glassy relaxation,

    R. G. Palmer, D. L. Stein, E. Abrahams, and P. W. An- derson, “Models of hierarchically constrained dynamics for glassy relaxation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 958 (1984)

    1984

  9. [17]

    Dynamics on the way to forming glass: Bubbles in space-time,

    D. Chandler and J. P. Garrahan, “Dynamics on the way to forming glass: Bubbles in space-time,” Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 61, 191 (2010)

    2010

  10. [18]

    Excitations are localized and relax- ation is hierarchical in glass-forming liquids,

    A. S. Keys, L. O. Hedges, J. P. Garrahan, S. C. Glotzer, and D. Chandler, “Excitations are localized and relax- ation is hierarchical in glass-forming liquids,” Phys. Rev. X 1, 021013 (2011)

    2011

  11. [19]

    Thirty mil- liseconds in the life of a supercooled liquid,

    C. Scalliet, B. Guiselin, and L. Berthier, “Thirty mil- liseconds in the life of a supercooled liquid,” Phys. Rev. X 12, 041028 (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    Glass- forming liquids need facilitation,

    L. Costigliola, T. Hecksher, and J. C. Dyre, “Glass- forming liquids need facilitation,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 121, e2408798121 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    Emergent facilitation behavior in a distinguishable-particle lattice model of glass,

    L.-H. Zhang and C.-H. Lam, “Emergent facilitation behavior in a distinguishable-particle lattice model of glass,” Phys. Rev. B 95, 184202 (2017)

    2017

  14. [22]

    Scaling description of dynamical heterogene- ity and avalanches of relaxation in glass-forming liquids,

    A. Tahaei, G. Biroli, M. Ozawa, M. Popovi´ c, and M. Wyart, “Scaling description of dynamical heterogene- ity and avalanches of relaxation in glass-forming liquids,” Phys. Rev. X 13, 031034 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    Elasticity, facilitation, and dy- namic heterogeneity in glass-forming liquids,

    M. Ozawa and G. Biroli, “Elasticity, facilitation, and dy- namic heterogeneity in glass-forming liquids,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 138201 (2023)

    2023

  16. [24]

    Emergent facili- tation and glassy dynamics in supercooled liquids,

    M. R. Hasyim and K. K. Mandadapu, “Emergent facili- tation and glassy dynamics in supercooled liquids,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 121, e2322592121 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Collective relaxation dy- namics in a three-dimensional lattice glass model,

    Y. Nishikawa and L. Berthier, “Collective relaxation dy- namics in a three-dimensional lattice glass model,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 067101 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Free volume holes diffusion to de- 12 scribe physical aging in poly (mehtyl methacrylate)/silica nanocomposites,

    D. Cangialosi, V. M. Boucher, A. Alegria, and J. Colmenero, “Free volume holes diffusion to de- 12 scribe physical aging in poly (mehtyl methacrylate)/silica nanocomposites,” J. Chem. Phys. 135, 014901 (2011)

    2011

  19. [27]

    Direct evidence of void-induced structural relaxations in colloidal glass formers,

    C.-T. Yip, M. Isobe, C.-H. Chan, S. Ren, K.-P. Wong, Q. Huo, C.-S. Lee, Y.-H. Tsang, Y. Han, and C.-H. Lam, “Direct evidence of void-induced structural relaxations in colloidal glass formers,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 258001 (2020)

    2020

  20. [28]

    Local-average free volume correlates with dynamics in glass formers,

    B. Mei, B. Zhuang, Y. Lu, L. An, and Z.-G. Wang, “Local-average free volume correlates with dynamics in glass formers,” J. Phys. Chem. Letters 13, 3957 (2022)

    2022

  21. [29]

    Repetition and pair-interaction of string- like hopping motions in glassy polymers,

    C.-H. Lam, “Repetition and pair-interaction of string- like hopping motions in glassy polymers,” J. Chem. Phys. 146, 244906 (2017)

    2017

  22. [30]

    and effect [32], a wide range of kinetic fragility [31], large heat capacity overshoot in fragile glass [33], char- acteristic heat capacity of two-level systems at very low temperature [34], Kauzmann paradox [36], and fragile- to-strong transition [38]. Nevertheless, due to s...

  23. [31]

    Spatial heterogeneities in structural temperature cause kovacs’ expansion gap paradox in aging of glasses,

    M. Lulli, C.-S. Lee, H.-Y. Deng, C.-T. Yip, and C.-H. Lam, “Spatial heterogeneities in structural temperature cause kovacs’ expansion gap paradox in aging of glasses,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 095501 (2020)

    2020

  24. [32]

    Fragile glasses associated with a dramatic drop of entropy under supercooling,

    C.-S. Lee, M. Lulli, L.-H. Zhang, H.-Y. Deng, and C.-H. Lam, “Fragile glasses associated with a dramatic drop of entropy under supercooling,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 265703 (2020)

    2020

  25. [33]

    Kovacs effect in glass with material memory revealed in non-equilibrium particle in- teractions,

    Matteo Lulli, Chun-Shing Lee, Ling-Han Zhang, Hai-Yao Deng, and Chi-Hang Lam, “Kovacs effect in glass with material memory revealed in non-equilibrium particle in- teractions,” J. Stat. Mech. 2021, 093303 (2021)

    2021

  26. [34]

    Large heat-capacity jump in cooling-heating of fragile glass from kinetic monte carlo simulations based on a two-state picture,

    C.-S. Lee, H.-Y. Deng, C.-T. Yip, and C.-H. Lam, “Large heat-capacity jump in cooling-heating of fragile glass from kinetic monte carlo simulations based on a two-state picture,” Phys. Rev. E 104, 024131 (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    Emergence of two-level systems in glass formers: a kinetic monte carlo study,

    X.-Y. Gao, H.-Y. Deng, C.-S. Lee, J.Q. You, and C.-H. Lam, “Emergence of two-level systems in glass formers: a kinetic monte carlo study,” Soft Matter 18, 2211 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    Diffusion-coefficient power laws and defect-driven glassy dynamics in swap acceleration,

    G. Gopinath, C.-S. Lee, X.-Y. Gao, X.-D. An, C.- H. Chan, C.-T. Yip, H.-Y. Deng, and C.-H. Lam, “Diffusion-coefficient power laws and defect-driven glassy dynamics in swap acceleration,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 168002 (2022)

    2022

  29. [37]

    Kauzmann paradox: A possi- ble crossover due to diminishing local excitations,

    X.-Y. Gao, C.-Y. Ong, C.-S. Lee, C.-T. Yip, H.-Y. Deng, and C.-H. Lam, “Kauzmann paradox: A possi- ble crossover due to diminishing local excitations,” Phys. Rev. B 107, 174206 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    The distinguishable-particle lattice model of glasses in three dimensions,

    B. Li, C.-S. Lee, X.-Y. Gao, H.-Y. Deng, and C.-H. Lam, “The distinguishable-particle lattice model of glasses in three dimensions,” Soft Matter 20, 1009 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    Relating fragile-to-strong transition to fragile glass via lattice model simulations,

    C.-Y. Ong, C.-S. Lee, X.-Y. Gao, Q. Zhai, Z. Yu, R. Shi, H.-Y. Deng, and C.-H. Lam, “Relating fragile-to-strong transition to fragile glass via lattice model simulations,” Phys. Rev. E 109, 054124 (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    Surface mobility gradient and emergent facilitation in glassy films,

    Q. Zhai, X.-Y. Gao, C.-S. Lee, C.-Y. Ong, K. Yan, H.- Y. Deng, S. Yang, and C.-H. Lam, “Surface mobility gradient and emergent facilitation in glassy films,” Soft Matter 20, 4389 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    M´ ezard, G

    M. M´ ezard, G. Parisi, and M.-A. Virasoro, Spin glass theory and beyond. (World Scientific, 1990)

    1990

  34. [42]

    https://github.com/leolamsi/frw

  35. [43]

    Are defect models consistent with the entropy and specific heat of glass formers?

    G. Biroli, J.-P. Bouchaud, and G. Tarjus, “Are defect models consistent with the entropy and specific heat of glass formers?” J. Chem. Phys. 123, 044510 (2005)

    2005

  36. [44]

    Calori- metric glass transition explained by hierarchical dynamic facilitation,

    A. S. Keys, J. P. Garrahan, and D. Chandler, “Calori- metric glass transition explained by hierarchical dynamic facilitation,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110, 4482 (2013)

    2013

  37. [45]

    Structural re- arrangements governing johari-goldstein relaxations in metallic glasses,

    H.-B. Yu, R. Richert, and K. Samwer, “Structural re- arrangements governing johari-goldstein relaxations in metallic glasses,” Sci. Adv. 3, e1701577 (2017)

    2017

  38. [46]

    Probing slow glass dynamics down to 10- 5 hz,

    X.-M. Yang, Q. Yang, T. Zhang, and H.-B. Yu, “Probing slow glass dynamics down to 10- 5 hz,” Applied Physics Reviews 11 (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    Local random configuration-tree theory for string repetition and facilitated dynamics of glass,

    C.-H. Lam, “Local random configuration-tree theory for string repetition and facilitated dynamics of glass,” J. Stat. Mech. 2018, 023301 (2018)

    2018

  40. [48]

    Configuration-tree theoretical calculation of the mean-squared displacement of particles in glass formers,

    H.-Y. Deng, C.-S. Lee, M. Lulli, L.-H. Zhang, and C.-H. Lam, “Configuration-tree theoretical calculation of the mean-squared displacement of particles in glass formers,” J. Stat. Mech. 2019, 094014 (2019)

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.