Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 50 references

Partial-immunity of two-photon correlation against wavefront distortion for spatially entangled photons

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The two-photon correlation of spatially entangled photons is immune to the odd-parity half of far-field phase disorder, so only the even-parity half must be corrected.

desk verdict Odd-parity immunity is real under the stated weak-disorder limit, but the practical adaptive-optics claim lacks the domain-of-validity estimate that would make it convincing. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.09268 v2 pith:3DTFTO5J submitted 2024-12-12 quant-ph cond-mat.dis-nnphysics.optics

Kiran Bajar , Rounak Chatterjee , Vikas S. Bhat , Sushil Mujumdar This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phcond-mat.dis-nnphysics.optics
keywords spatiallyentangledphotonstwo-photoncorrelationodd-evenparityphasedisorderadaptiveopticsZernikepolynomialsspontaneousparametricdown-conversionwavefrontdistortionspeckle
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the odd-parity component of a far-field phase distortion leaves the two-photon correlation of spatially entangled SPDC photons unchanged, while only the even-parity component reshapes it. The reason is that, for a thin crystal, the two photons in each pair inherit equal and opposite transverse momenta, so the phase they accumulate is $\varphi(k_1)+\varphi(-k_1)=2\varphi_e(k_1)$ and the odd part cancels. The claim matters practically because it means wavefront correction for two-photon correlations can ignore half of the aberration content, halving the number of independent adaptive-optics elements and speeding up optimization. The paper supports the claim with an analytic derivation, experiments using a deformable mirror programmed with Zernike polynomials, and numerical simulations at stronger disorder.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the parity decomposition of the far-field phase combined with the anti-correlated momentum structure of the SPDC wavefunction. The double-Gaussian state (Eq. 1) has a narrow factor in $(k_1+k_2)$; for $\sigma_+ \gg \sigma_-$ and a phase screen that varies slowly in $k$-space, that factor acts as $\delta(k_1+k_2)$. That delta lock makes the total phase picked up by the pair $\varphi(k_1)+\varphi(-k_1)$, so only $\varphi_e$ survives. The auxiliary-pump comparison works because a beam at half the wavelength accumulates twice the phase, yielding the same $e^{i2\varphi_e(k)}$ factor and hence the same interference pattern.

What would settle it

Measure the two-photon correlation behind an odd-parity phase screen whose $k$-space features are comparable to or smaller than $1/\sigma_+$; if the correlation pattern moves beyond the finite-Schmidt-number baseline seen with a flat mirror, the delta-function approximation and the strict odd-parity immunity are falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central discovery is the parity-selection rule expressed in Eq. 6: after the phase screen, the two-photon correlation is $$C(x_1,x_2) \propto \left|\int dk_1\, $e^{{ik_1(x_1-x_2)}}$\, $e^{{i2\varphi_e(k_1)}}$\, $e^{{-2k_1^2\sigma_-^2}}$\right|^2,$$ with $\varphi_e(k)=(\varphi(k)+\varphi(-k))/2$. The even-parity phase acts through the doubled phase $2\varphi_e$, exactly like a coherent auxiliary pump at half the wavelength, while the odd-parity part $\varphi_o$ cancels between the paired photons. The same cancellation is shown experimentally: random combinations of odd Zernike modes disturb the auxiliary pump pattern but leave the two-photon correlation peak intact, and simulations with random phase masks reproduce the effect at stronger disorder.

Load-bearing premise

The whole result depends on treating the pump-width factor as a delta function that locks the two photons to opposite momenta, which requires the phase screen to vary slowly and the pump waist to be much wider than the crystal's momentum spread; if those conditions fail, odd-parity phase can leak into the correlation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Wavefront-correction loops for two-photon correlations can be restricted to even-parity Zernike modes, roughly halving the number of actuators and iterations.
  • The brighter auxiliary-pump speckle can serve as a feedback signal for correcting the even-parity part of the disorder, since it carries the same even-parity information as the two-photon pattern.
  • Optical elements or atmospheric layers that introduce purely odd-parity aberrations in the shared path of the photon pair will not degrade the two-photon correlation and may not need correction.
  • Because the two-photon pattern is preserved under odd-only disorder, high-dimensional spatial-entanglement links are inherently more robust to certain classes of turbulence than their intensity patterns suggest.
  • Numerical simulations indicate the even-only sensitivity survives at disorder strengths beyond the deformable mirror's range, so the halving argument is not limited to weak distortions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial: the same parity-selection argument should apply to any biphoton state whose wavefunction peaks at $k_1+k_2=0$, so the halved-correction claim may generalize beyond SPDC to other spatially antisymmetric entangled pairs; this is not tested in the paper.
  • Editorial: the paper does not quantify how the odd-parity cancellation degrades as $\sigma_+/\sigma_-$ shrinks or as the phase screen gains fine $k$-space structure; a controlled scan of those two parameters would place a practical validity boundary on the rule.
  • Editorial: in free-space or in-fiber quantum communication where both photons share the same channel, odd-parity atmospheric aberrations could be left uncorrected, which would simplify the error budget for high-dimensional QKD; this extension follows only if the shared-channel geometry assumed here holds.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper studies the effect of arbitrary phase distortions in the far field of collinear degenerate SPDC on two-photon spatial correlations. Starting from the double-Gaussian biphoton amplitude, the authors show that, under the approximation exp[-(k1+k2)^2 sigma_+^2/2] ≈ delta(k1+k2), the two-photon correlation C(x1,x2) depends only on the even-parity part phi_e(k) of the phase phi(k), while the odd-parity part cancels because the two photons acquire opposite transverse momenta. They compare this correlation with the far-field interference of a 405-nm auxiliary pump subjected to the same even-parity phase, perform experiments with a deformable mirror using Zernike polynomials with well-defined parity, and run numerical simulations that they claim extend the result to stronger disorder. The central practical claim is that adaptive-optics correction of two-photon correlations only needs to address even-parity modes, halving the number of required independent elements.

Significance. If the central claim holds in the claimed parameter range, the result is practically useful: it would simplify wavefront correction for spatially entangled photons in quantum imaging and communication, and it connects with earlier even-order aberration-cancellation results. The theoretical derivation from Eq. (1) to Eq. (6) is clean under the stated delta approximation, and the odd-parity cancellation is exact in the limit of infinite sigma_+/sigma_- and slowly varying phase. The experiment is well designed, with a DM-based implementation of Zernike modes, a measured Schmidt number of 707 ± 10, and a speckle-contrast comparison of the two wavelengths. The simulations also provide quantitative correlation coefficients (0.99 between even-only patterns; 0.94 between full and even-only two-photon patterns). However, the significance is conditional: the paper does not bound the residual odd-parity leakage for finite Schmidt number, the strong-disorder simulations are under-parameterized, and the experimental validation is visual rather than quantitative. As it stands, the practical halving claim is supported only in an idealized limit.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II, Eqs. (3)-(6)] The central result Eq. (6) is obtained by replacing exp[-(k1+k2)^2 sigma_+^2/2] with delta(k1+k2). For the finite Schmidt numbers used in this work (K ≈ 707 in the experiment, ≈ 1600 in the simulation, i.e., sigma_+/sigma_- ≈ 53), this replacement is approximate. Writing s = (k1+k2)/2 and q = k1-k2, the odd-parity part of the phase appears in the combination phi_o(s+q/2) + phi_o(s-q/2), which for small s is approximately s phi_o'(q/2) + O(s^3). After integration over the common coordinate, as in Eq. (8), the s variable is weighted by a Gaussian of width set by sigma_+, and the average of exp[i s phi_o'(q/2)] introduces a factor of the form exp[-phi_o'(q/2)^2/(4 sigma_+^2)] (up to normalization) inside the q-integrand. Thus odd-parity disorder with a large k-space gradient, or with sigma_+ not sufficiently larger than sigma_-, can alter the two-photon correlation. The paper states the slow-variation condition in words after Eq. (3) but never converts it into a quantitative domain-of-validity estimate; this is the load-bearing gap for the adaptive-optics claim, since halving the number of elements requires the residual odd leakage to be below the correction tolerance.
  2. [Section IV, Fig. 6] The claim that the result extends to stronger degrees of disorder is not supported by the reported simulation parameters. The text gives only a Schmidt number of ≈ 1600 and a 'random phase mask'; it does not state the amplitude of the phase fluctuations, the k-space correlation length or spectrum, or the values of sigma_+ and sigma_- separately. Moreover, the reported correlation coefficient of 0.94 between the full two-photon speckle (Fig. 6(f)) and the even-only pattern (Fig. 6(g)) is direct quantitative evidence that the odd-parity component produces a non-negligible residual effect. The paper attributes this to finite Schmidt number but provides no quantitative model for the size of this leakage or its scaling with K, sigma_+, and the phase gradient. Without such a bound, the practical statement that only even-parity modes need correction is not quantitatively established.
  3. [Section III.B, Figs. 4 and 5] The experimental validation of the central claim is entirely qualitative. The text states that the experimental results are in 'excellent agreement' with theory, but no correlation coefficients, residuals, or error bars are reported for the central comparisons: the odd-disorder panels (c)-(f) of Fig. 4 and the general-disorder versus even-only comparisons in Fig. 5. The only quantitative coefficients given are for the simulated images in Fig. 6 (0.99 and 0.94). Since the experiment is used to support the theoretical claim and the practical recommendation, the absence of quantitative agreement metrics and uncertainty estimates, especially given that 50,000-300,000 frames were acquired, is a significant gap.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section II, Eq. (7)] In Eq. (7), the phase is written as 2 phi_e(k_p) with k_p = 2 k_1; as written, this conflates the transverse-momentum argument of the 810-nm phase with that of the 405-nm auxiliary beam. The functional-form identity holds only if the phase argument is rescaled, e.g., by defining tilde{phi}_e(k_p) = phi_e(k_p/2). The notation should be clarified.
  2. [Appendix A, Table I] Table I lists Z8 and Z9 with identical expressions, sqrt(8)(3 rho^3 - 2 rho) sin(theta); one of these should presumably be cos(theta) in the standard Zernike basis. This typo should be corrected.
  3. [Section III.A, Eq. (8)] The sentence following Eq. (8) says the frames are post-analyzed using coincidence detection and background subtraction, but the displayed equation only shows the subtraction of accidental coincidences from consecutive frames; the background-subtraction procedure should be specified explicitly.
  4. [Section II and Appendix C] The phrase 'same beam waist (sqrt(2)/sigma_-) in the k-plane' in Section II is difficult to parse; please state whether this is a real-space waist or a k-space width. Also, the speckle-contrast comparison in Appendix C shows comparable disorder strength at 405 nm and 810 nm, but speckle contrast alone does not certify that the two wavelengths experience the same phase profile; a more direct phase calibration would strengthen the auxiliary-pump comparison.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the even-parity result follows from an explicit delta-function approximation and is independently checked by simulation and experiment.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. Starting from the double-Gaussian SPDC wavefunction (Eq. 1) and the far-field phase transfer function (Eq. 2), the correlation expression (Eq. 3) is reduced to Eq. 4 by the explicitly stated assumption that exp[-(k1+k2)^2 sigma_+^2/2] may be replaced by delta(k1+k2) for sigma_+ >> sigma_- and slowly varying phase. The appearance of only the combination phi(k1)+phi(-k1)=2*phi_e(k1) in Eq. 5 is an algebraic identity, not a circular definition: phi_e is defined as (phi(k)+phi(-k))/2, and the statement that odd-parity phase drops out is the derived content, not an input. No parameter is fitted to the data to force the odd-even immunity; the experimental odd-parity configurations in Figs. 4 and 5 show unchanged two-photon correlations, and the Section IV simulation uses the full 4D double-Gaussian wavefunction with a random phase mask rather than directly imposing Eq. 6. The auxiliary pump in Eq. 7 is deliberately constructed to share the functional form of Eq. 6, so pump/two-photon agreement is partly by design, but this comparison is not load-bearing for the central odd-even claim; it is proposed only as a feedback tool. Self-citations (Refs. 36 and 41) appear only for Schmidt-number and EMCCD analysis methods and are not load-bearing for the theoretical result. The main limitations—finite Schmidt number leakage and unspecified strong-disorder parameters—are domain-of-validity and correctness concerns, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced; the auxiliary pump is a classical beam used as a diagnostic. No ad hoc constants are fitted to force the central result; the measured sigma_+ and sigma_- values only set the validity regime.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The SPDC biphoton wavefunction is the double Gaussian of Eq. 1 for collinear degenerate SPDC.
    The entire derivation starts from this standard model taken from Ref. 34; any deviations in real SPDC, such as non-Gaussian phase matching, are not captured.
  • domain assumption sigma_+ >> sigma_- and the phase screen varies slowly on the scale 1/sigma_+, so e^{-(k1+k2)^2*sigma_+^2/2} can be replaced by delta(k1+k2).
    Stated after Eq. 3. This is load-bearing because it forces k2 = -k1 and makes the odd-parity contribution vanish identically.
  • domain assumption Both photons pass through the same scalar phase distortion Ad(k) = exp(i*phi(k)).
    Used in Eqs. 2-6 and throughout; applicable to common-path collinear geometry, not to separate channels with different aberrations.
  • domain assumption The finite but high Schmidt number makes the two-photon correlation from odd-parity disorder approximately a Dirac delta.
    Used in Section IV to explain why the total disorder pattern matches the even-parity-only pattern; exact cancellation requires infinite Schmidt number.
  • standard math Zernike polynomials provide a complete basis for the deformable mirror surface deformations, with well-defined parity.
    Invoked in Appendix A to justify constructing odd and even disorder from linear combinations of Zernike modes.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Partial-immunity of two-photon correlation against wavefront distortion for spatially entangled photons." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3DTFTO5J

@misc{pith2026241209268,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Partial-immunity of two-photon correlation against wavefront distortion for spatially entangled photons},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3DTFTO5J}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.09268}
}
read the original abstract

High-dimensional quantum entanglement in photons offers notable technological advancements over traditional qubit-based systems, including increased information density and enhanced security. However, such high-dimensional states are vulnerable to disruption by complex disordered media, presenting significant challenges in practical applications. Spatially-entangled photons are conventionally generated using a nonlinear crystal via spontaneous parametric down conversion (SPDC). While the effect of disorder on spatially entangled photons in the near field of the crystal is well understood, the impact of disorder in the far field is more complex. In this work, we present a systematic study of the randomization of two-photon correlations caused by arbitrary phase distortions in the far field by breaking it down into odd and even parity components. First, we theoretically show that the two-photon field is only sensitive to the even-parity part of the phase distortion. In follow-up experiments, we employ a deformable mirror to implement random phase distortions, separating the contributions of odd and even parity phases using Zernike polynomials. The experimental results are in agreements with the theoretical predictions. Subsequently, we perform numerical simulations to show that these results extend to stronger degrees of disorder. Our key finding is that, since two-photon correlations are only affected by the even-parity component of phase modulations, the number of independent adaptive optics elements required for optimizing the correlation can be effectively halved, offering a significant practical advantage in managing disorder in quantum systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.09268 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Numerical calculations of two-photon interference of spatially entangled photons and its comparison with interference pattern of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Numerically-computed intensity patterns obtained in the far field using Zernike polynomials (Z [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Experimental setup. L: Lens, PPKTP: Periodically-poled [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Experimental results for no phase (first row) and two dif [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Experimental results for two different general disorders (first row) and their even-parity components (second row) implemented using [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Result of numerical simulation with a two-dimensional double Gaussian wavefunction in momentum variable illuminating a random [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (a) The layout of the 40 segments of the DM. (b) Structure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (a) The original beam recorded using EMCCD camera in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Interference pattern observed with coherent light source of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    merlin.mbs aapmrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aapmrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translat...

    2010

  2. [2]

    merlin.mbs aipauth4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aipauth4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translat...

    2010

  3. [3]

    merlin.mbs aipnum4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aipnum4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translati...

    2010

  4. [4]

    merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translati...

    2010

  5. [5]

    merlin.mbs apsrmp4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs apsrmp4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translati...

    2010

  6. [6]

    author author N. J. \ Cerf , author M. Bourennane , author A. Karlsson , \ and\ author N. Gisin ,\ title title Security of quantum key distribution using d-level systems , \ 10.1103/physrevlett.88.127902 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 88 ( year 2002 ),\ 10.1103/physrevlett.88.127902 NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.127902

  7. [7]

    Erhard , author M

    author author M. Erhard , author M. Krenn , \ and\ author A. Zeilinger ,\ title title Advances in high-dimensional quantum entanglement , \ 10.1038/s42254-020-0193-5 journal journal Nature Reviews Physics \ volume 2 ,\ pages 365–381 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/s42254-020-0193-5

  8. [8]

    author author D. N. \ Klyshko ,\ 10.1201/9780203743508 title Photons and nonlinear optics , \ ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1201/9780203743508 2018

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    author author C. Couteau ,\ title title Spontaneous parametric down-conversion , \ 10.1080/00107514.2018.1488463/ASSET/40D680C4-32CA-435D-A876-364396CE0768/ASSETS/IMAGES/TCPH_A_1488463_F0010_C.JPG journal journal Contemporary Physics \ volume 59 ,\ pages 291--304 ( year 2018 )...

    2018

  2. [10]

    Di Lorenzo Pires , author F

    author author H. Di Lorenzo Pires , author F. M. G. J. \ Coppens , \ and\ author M. P. \ van Exter ,\ title title Type-i spontaneous parametric down-conversion with a strongly focused pump , \ 10.1103/physreva.83.033837 journal journal Physical Review A \ volume 83 ( year 2011...

    doi

  3. [11]

    author author J. C. \ Howell , author R. S. \ Bennink , author S. J. \ Bentley , \ and\ author R. W. \ Boyd ,\ title title Realization of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox Using Momentum- and Position-Entangled Photons from Spontaneous Parametric Down Conversion , \ 10.1103/...

    doi

  4. [12]

    Avenhaus , author M

    author author M. Avenhaus , author M. V. \ Chekhova , author L. A. \ Krivitsky , author G. Leuchs , \ and\ author C. Silberhorn ,\ title title Experimental verification of high spectral entanglement for pulsed waveguided spontaneous parametric down-conversion , \ 10.1103/PhysR...

    doi

  5. [13]

    Mair , author A

    author author A. Mair , author A. Vaziri , author G. Weihs , \ and\ author A. Zeilinger ,\ title title Entanglement of the orbital angular momentum states of photons , \ 10.1038/35085529 journal journal Nature 2001 412:6844 \ volume 412 ,\ pages 313--316 ( year 2001 ) ,\ http:...

    2001

  6. [14]

    Krenn , author M

    author author M. Krenn , author M. Malik , author M. Erhard , \ and\ author A. Zeilinger ,\ title title Orbital angular momentum of photons and the entanglement of laguerre–gaussian modes , \ 10.1098/rsta.2015.0442 journal journal Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Societ...

    2015

  7. [15]

    Boucher , author H

    author author P. Boucher , author H. Defienne , \ and\ author S. Gigan ,\ title title Engineering spatial correlations of entangled photon pairs by pump beam shaping , \ 10.1364/ol.425372 journal journal Optics Letters \ volume 46 ,\ pages 4200 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    doi

  8. [16]

    Lib , author K

    author author O. Lib , author K. Sulimany , author M. Araújo , author M. Ben-Or , \ and\ author Y. Bromberg ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.04210 title High-dimensional quantum key distribution using a multi-plane light converter , \ ( year 2024 ),\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.042...

    2024 arXiv

  9. [17]

    author author W. H. \ Peeters , author J. J. \ Moerman , \ and\ author M. P. \ Van Exter ,\ title title Observation of two-photon speckle patterns , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.173601 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 104 ( year 2010 ),\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.17...

    doi

  10. [18]

    author author R. J. \ Glauber ,\ title title The quantum theory of optical coherence , \ 10.1103/PhysRev.130.2529 journal journal Physical Review \ volume 130 ,\ pages 2529--2539 ( year 1963 ) NoStop

    1963 doi

  11. [19]

    Bouchard , author A

    author author F. Bouchard , author A. Sit , author Y. Zhang , author R. Fickler , author F. M. \ Miatto , author Y. Yao , author F. Sciarrino , \ and\ author E. Karimi ,\ title title Two-photon interference: the hong–ou–mandel effect , \ 10.1088/1361-6633/abcd7a journal journa...

    doi

  12. [20]

    Ghosh \ and\ author L

    author author R. Ghosh \ and\ author L. Mandel ,\ title title Observation of nonclassical effects in the interference of two photons , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.1903 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 59 ,\ pages 1903--1905 ( year 1987 ) NoStop

    1903 doi

  13. [21]

    author author C. W. \ Beenakker , author J. W. \ Venderbos , \ and\ author M. P. \ Van Exter ,\ title title Two-Photon speckle as a probe of Multi-Dimensional entanglement , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.193601 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 102 ( year 2009 ),\ 1...

    arXiv

  14. [22]

    Etcheverry , author G

    author author S. Etcheverry , author G. Cañas , author E. S. \ Gómez , author W. A. T. \ Nogueira , author C. Saavedra , author G. B. \ Xavier , \ and\ author G. Lima ,\ title title Quantum key distribution session with 16-dimensional photonic states , \ 10.1038/srep02316 jour...

    doi

  15. [23]

    Otte , author I

    author author E. Otte , author I. Nape , author C. Rosales-Guzmán , author C. Denz , author A. Forbes , \ and\ author B. Ndagano ,\ title title High-dimensional cryptography with spatial modes of light: tutorial , \ 10.1364/josab.399290 journal journal Journal of the Optical S...

    doi

  16. [24]

    Zhou , author M

    author author Y. Zhou , author M. Mirhosseini , author S. Oliver , author J. Zhao , author S. M. H. \ Rafsanjani , author M. P. J. \ Lavery , author A. E. \ Willner , \ and\ author R. W. \ Boyd ,\ title title Using all transverse degrees of freedom in quantum communications ba...

    doi

  17. [25]

    Untern \" a hrer , author B

    author author M. Untern \" a hrer , author B. Bessire , author L. Gasparini , author M. Perenzoni , \ and\ author A. Stefanov ,\ title title Super-resolution quantum imaging at the Heisenberg limit , \ 10.1364/optica.5.001150 journal journal Optica \ volume 5 ,\ pages 1150 ( y...

    arXiv

  18. [26]

    He , author Y

    author author Z. He , author Y. Zhang , author X. Tong , author L. Li , \ and\ author L. V. \ Wang ,\ title title Quantum microscopy of cells at the Heisenberg limit , \ 10.1038/s41467-023-38191-4 journal journal Nature Communications \ volume 14 ( year 2023 ),\ 10.1038/s41467...

    arXiv

  19. [27]

    author author N. H. \ Valencia , author S. Goel , author W. McCutcheon , author H. Defienne , \ and\ author M. Malik ,\ title title Unscrambling entanglement through a complex medium , \ 10.1038/s41567-020-0970-1 journal journal Nature Physics \ volume 16 ,\ pages 1112–1116 ( ...

    doi

  20. [28]

    Lib , author G

    author author O. Lib , author G. Hasson , \ and\ author Y. Bromberg ,\ title title Real-time shaping of entangled photons by classical control and feedback , \ 10.1126/sciadv.abb6298 journal journal Science Advances \ volume 6 ( year 2020 ),\ 10.1126/sciadv.abb6298 ,\ http://a...

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    Courme , author P

    author author B. Courme , author P. Cameron , author D. Faccio , author S. Gigan , \ and\ author H. Defienne ,\ title title Manipulation and certification of high-dimensional entanglement through a scattering medium , \ 10.1103/prxquantum.4.010308 journal journal PRX Quantum \...

    doi

  22. [30]

    Lib \ and\ author Y

    author author O. Lib \ and\ author Y. Bromberg ,\ title title Pump-shaping of non-collinear and non-degenerate entangled photons , \ 10.1364/ol.411606 journal journal Optics Letters \ volume 45 ,\ pages 6827 ( year 2020 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.14772 arXiv:2009.14772 NoStop

    2020 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Devaux , author A

    author author F. Devaux , author A. Mosset , author S. M. \ Popoff , \ and\ author E. Lantz ,\ title title Restoring and tailoring very high dimensional spatial entanglement of a biphoton state transmitted through a scattering medium , \ 10.1088/2040-8986/acc2ce journal journa...

    arXiv

  24. [32]

    author author K. W. \ Chan , author J. P. \ Torres , \ and\ author J. H. \ Eberly ,\ title title Transverse entanglement migration in Hilbert space , \ 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.050101 journal journal Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics \ volume 75 ( year 2007...

    doi

  25. [33]

    author author A. N. \ Black , author E. Giese , author B. Braverman , author N. Zollo , author S. M. \ Barnett , \ and\ author R. W. \ Boyd ,\ title title Quantum Nonlocal Aberration Cancellation , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.143603 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volu...

    doi

  26. [34]

    \ Hu , author Y

    author author X.-M. \ Hu , author Y. Guo , author B.-H. \ Liu , author Y.-F. \ Huang , author C.-F. \ Li , \ and\ author G.-C. \ Guo ,\ title title Beating the channel capacity limit for superdense coding with entangled ququarts , \ 10.1126/sciadv.aat9304 journal journal Scien...

    doi

  27. [35]

    Guo , author B

    author author Y. Guo , author B. Liu , author C. Li , \ and\ author G. Guo ,\ title title Advances in quantum dense coding , \ 10.1002/qute.201900011 journal journal Advanced Quantum Technologies \ volume 2 ( year 2019 ),\ 10.1002/qute.201900011 NoStop

    2019 doi

  28. [36]

    author author G. L. \ Long \ and\ author X. S. \ Liu ,\ title title Theoretically efficient high-capacity quantum-key-distribution scheme , \ 10.1103/physreva.65.032302 journal journal Physical Review A \ volume 65 ( year 2002 ),\ 10.1103/physreva.65.032302 NoStop

    doi

  29. [37]

    author author A. Cabello ,\ title title Quantum key distribution in the holevo limit , \ 10.1103/physrevlett.85.5635 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 85 ,\ pages 5635–5638 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    doi

  30. [38]

    \ Deng , author G

    author author F.-G. \ Deng , author G. L. \ Long , \ and\ author X.-S. \ Liu ,\ title title Two-step quantum direct communication protocol using the einstein-podolsky-rosen pair block , \ 10.1103/physreva.68.042317 journal journal Physical Review A \ volume 68 ( year 2003 ),\ ...

    doi

  31. [39]

    Schneeloch \ and\ author J

    author author J. Schneeloch \ and\ author J. C. \ Howell ,\ title title Introduction to the transverse spatial correlations in spontaneous parametric down-conversion through the biphoton birth zone , \ 10.1088/2040-8978/18/5/053501 journal journal Journal of Optics (United Kin...

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    author author C. K. \ Law \ and\ author J. H. \ Eberly ,\ title title Analysis and interpretation of high transverse entanglement in optical parametric down conversion , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.127903 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 92 ( year 2004 ),\ 10.1103...

  33. [41]

    author author V. S. \ Bhat , author K. Bajar , author R. Chatterjee , \ and\ author S. Mujumdar ,\ title title Facile dual-shot measurement of schmidt number in type-0 and type-2 downconversion , \ 10.1103/physrevresearch.6.033151 journal journal Physical Review Research \ vol...

    doi

  34. [42]

    Bonato , author A

    author author C. Bonato , author A. V. \ Sergienko , author B. E. \ Saleh , author S. Bonora , \ and\ author P. Villoresi ,\ title title Even-order aberration cancellation in quantum interferometry , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.233603 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ vo...

    doi

  35. [43]

    author author R. K. \ Tyson \ and\ author B. W. \ Frazier ,\ 10.1201/9781003140191 title Principles of Adaptive Optics \ ( publisher CRC Press ,\ year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022 doi

  36. [44]

    Edgar , author D

    author author M. Edgar , author D. Tasca , author F. Izdebski , author R. Warburton , author J. Leach , author M. Agnew , author G. Buller , author R. Boyd , \ and\ author M. Padgett ,\ title title Imaging high-dimensional spatial entanglement with a camera , \ 10.1038/ncomms1...

    doi

  37. [45]

    Defienne , author M

    author author H. Defienne , author M. Reichert , author J. W. \ Fleischer , \ and\ author P. G. \ Kwiat ,\ title title General Model of Photon-Pair Detection with an Image Sensor , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.203604 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 120 ( year 201...

    doi

  38. [46]

    Chatterjee , author V

    author author R. Chatterjee , author V. S. \ Bhat , author K. Bajar , \ and\ author S. Mujumdar ,\ title title Multifold enhancement of quantum snr by using an emccd as a photon number resolving device , \ 10.1364/opticaq.518037 journal journal Optica Quantum \ volume 2 ,\ pag...

    doi

  39. [47]

    author author v. F. \ Zernike ,\ title title Beugungstheorie des schneidenver-fahrens und seiner verbesserten form, der phasenkontrastmethode , \ 10.1016/s0031-8914(34)80259-5 journal journal Physica \ volume 1 ,\ pages 689–704 ( year 1934 ) NoStop

    doi

  40. [48]

    Liu , author Z

    author author Y. Liu , author Z. Chen , author Z. Yang , author K. Niu , \ and\ author C. Tian ,\ title title Zernike polynomials and their applications , \ 10.1088/2040-8986/AC9E08 journal journal Journal of Optics \ volume 24 ,\ pages 123001 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    doi

  41. [49]

    Smarra , author E

    author author M. Smarra , author E. L. \ Gurevich , \ and\ author A. Ostendorf ,\ title title Theoretical simulation and experimental verification of dynamic caustic manipulation using a deformable mirror for laser material processing , \ 10.1016/j.optlastec.2021.107814 journa...

  42. [50]

    author author R. J. \ Noll ,\ title title Zernike polynomials and atmospheric turbulence , \ 10.1364/JOSA.66.000207 journal journal J. Opt. Soc. Am. \ volume 66 ,\ pages 207--211 ( year 1976 ) NoStop

    1976 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.