Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 73 references

Quantum evolution of mixed states and performance of quantum heat engines

T0 review · 3 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-23 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Coupled oscillators swap excitations to maximize work in quantum heat engines under parametric resonance.

desk verdict The paper gives an exact Heisenberg-style evolution for two or three coupled oscillators in different thermal states, showing they swap excitations, and uses this to claim max work in a photonic QHE at parametric resonance plus a Gaussian-to-thermal equivalence. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.10472 v2 submitted 2024-12-12 quant-ph physics.optics

Anatoly A. Svidzinsky , Wenzhuo Zhang This is my paper
classification quant-phphysics.optics
keywords quantumheatenginescoupledharmonicoscillatorsparametricresonancedensityoperatorevolutionGaussianstatesCarnotefficiencythermalmixed
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces a technique for calculating the time evolution of the density operator for mixed states, modeled after the Heisenberg representation. Applying this method yields exact solutions for the dynamics of two and three coupled harmonic oscillators that start in thermal states at different temperatures, revealing that the oscillators exchange their thermal properties through built-up correlations and generate noise-induced coherence. A photonic quantum heat engine is modeled as two such oscillators with time-dependent frequencies; the work output reaches its maximum precisely when the oscillators swap their numbers of excitations at the end of the cycle, a condition realized by operating under parametric resonance. The analysis also establishes that the Carnot formula sets the efficiency limit for quantum heat engines in general and that any n-mode Gaussian state can be rewritten via canonical transformation as a product of independent thermal states describing collective excitations at different temperatures.

What carries the argument

Parametric resonance condition in time-dependent coupled oscillators that induces swapping of excitation numbers between the modes at cycle end.

What would settle it

An experiment measuring work output in a two-cavity optical system while varying the frequency modulation parameters and checking whether the maximum occurs exactly when the excitation numbers are swapped at cycle end under parametric resonance.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that for a photonic quantum heat engine consisting of two optical cavities modeled as coupled harmonic oscillators with time-dependent frequencies, the work output reaches its maximum when the oscillators swap the number of excitations at the conclusion of the cycle. This swapping is achieved when the engine operates under parametric resonance. Additionally, the Carnot formula provides the limiting efficiency for quantum heat engines under general assumptions, and arbitrary n-mode Gaussian states can be expressed as products of thermal states for independent collective excitations through a canonical transformation, making operation with correlated Gaussian states and a

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that a photonic quantum heat engine can be modeled as two coupled harmonic oscillators with time-dependent frequencies that begin in thermal states at different temperatures.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a Heisenberg-picture-style technique for evolving the density operator of mixed states and applies it to obtain exact solutions for the dynamics of two- and three-mode coupled harmonic oscillators prepared in thermal states at different temperatures. These solutions reveal thermal-state swapping and noise-induced coherence. The authors model a photonic quantum heat engine as two optical cavities with time-dependent frequencies, claim that maximum work occurs when the oscillators exchange excitation numbers under parametric resonance, assert that the Carnot efficiency is the limiting value under general assumptions, and show via canonical transformation that any n-mode Gaussian state is equivalent to a product of independent thermal states with different temperatures.

Significance. If the exact evolution technique and the Carnot-limit derivation are correct, the work supplies a concrete analytical tool for mixed-state dynamics and clarifies how correlations affect extractable work in Gaussian quantum heat engines. The reduction of arbitrary Gaussian states to a product of thermal collective modes is a notable structural result that, if rigorously established, directly supports the claim that correlated Gaussian engines are thermodynamically equivalent to uncorrelated thermal reservoirs.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4] §4 (photonic QHE model): the central performance claims rest on modeling the engine as two coupled oscillators with externally prescribed time-dependent frequencies that begin in distinct thermal states; it is not shown that the frequency modulation protocol maintains fixed reservoir temperatures or produces a closed cycle in which heat and work are unambiguously defined via the standard two-point measurement or energy-balance relations.
  2. [§5] §5 (Carnot limit): the statement that 'Carnot formula yields limiting efficiency for QHEs under general assumptions' is load-bearing for the efficiency claim, yet the manuscript does not list the precise assumptions nor demonstrate that they are satisfied by the time-dependent oscillator model; without this, the generality of the bound cannot be assessed.
  3. [§3] §3 (exact evolution): while the Heisenberg-style map is presented as exact, the derivation of the work functional for the parametric-resonance cycle (Eq. (XX) or equivalent) must be shown to be independent of any post-hoc choice of cycle timing; otherwise the 'maximum work at excitation swap' result reduces to a property of the chosen protocol rather than a general feature.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the collective-mode temperatures after the canonical transformation should be introduced with an explicit equation relating them to the original covariance matrix elements.
  2. Figure captions for the parametric-resonance trajectories should state the precise initial temperatures and the value of the modulation depth used.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and valuable comments on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments below, providing clarifications and indicating the revisions we will make to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (photonic QHE model): the central performance claims rest on modeling the engine as two coupled oscillators with externally prescribed time-dependent frequencies that begin in distinct thermal states; it is not shown that the frequency modulation protocol maintains fixed reservoir temperatures or produces a closed cycle in which heat and work are unambiguously defined via the standard two-point measurement or energy-balance relations.

    Authors: We agree that additional clarification is needed on this point. In the revised version, we will explicitly state that the time-dependent frequencies are modulated to simulate the engine's interaction with hot and cold reservoirs while keeping their effective temperatures fixed through the initial thermal preparations and the resonance conditions. Heat and work will be defined using the energy-balance relations for the time-dependent Hamiltonian, consistent with standard treatments of parametric oscillators in quantum thermodynamics. The cycle is closed by the periodic return of the frequencies to their initial values after one period of parametric resonance. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§5] §5 (Carnot limit): the statement that 'Carnot formula yields limiting efficiency for QHEs under general assumptions' is load-bearing for the efficiency claim, yet the manuscript does not list the precise assumptions nor demonstrate that they are satisfied by the time-dependent oscillator model; without this, the generality of the bound cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We will revise the manuscript to list the precise assumptions under which the Carnot efficiency is the limiting value: (i) the system interacts with two thermal reservoirs at fixed temperatures T_h and T_c, (ii) the process is cyclic with no net change in the system's state, and (iii) the evolution is unitary between measurements. We will demonstrate that our model satisfies these by showing that the parametric resonance leads to the efficiency approaching the Carnot limit in the appropriate regime, as derived from the exact solutions. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [§3] §3 (exact evolution): while the Heisenberg-style map is presented as exact, the derivation of the work functional for the parametric-resonance cycle (Eq. (XX) or equivalent) must be shown to be independent of any post-hoc choice of cycle timing; otherwise the 'maximum work at excitation swap' result reduces to a property of the chosen protocol rather than a general feature.

    Authors: The maximum work at excitation swap is a direct consequence of the exact dynamics under the parametric resonance condition, which enforces the swap regardless of minor variations in timing as long as the resonance is maintained throughout the cycle. The work functional is derived from the Heisenberg-picture evolution and is independent of specific timing choices within the resonance window. We will add an explicit demonstration in the revised manuscript showing that the result holds for different cycle durations satisfying the resonance condition, confirming it is a general feature of the model. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: derivation applies new evolution technique to stated model without reduction to inputs or self-citations.

full rationale

The paper introduces an independent Heisenberg-like technique for density-operator evolution, derives exact solutions for the two- and three-oscillator systems, and obtains the swap condition, parametric-resonance maximum work, and Gaussian-to-product-of-thermals equivalence by direct application of that technique plus a standard canonical transformation. The Carnot bound is asserted under general assumptions separate from the specific oscillator model. No equation reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter by construction, no load-bearing premise rests on author self-citation, and no ansatz is smuggled via prior work. The modeling choice (coupled oscillators with time-dependent frequencies) is an explicit assumption, not a derived result that loops back on itself.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only access supplies no concrete information on free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; arrays left empty.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum evolution of mixed states and performance of quantum heat engines." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2412.10472

@misc{pith2026241210472,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum evolution of mixed states and performance of quantum heat engines},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2412.10472}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.10472}
}
read the original abstract

We introduce a technique for calculating the density operator time evolution along the lines of Heisenberg representation of quantum mechanics. Using this technique, we find the exact solution for the quantum evolution of two and three coupled harmonic oscillators initially prepared in thermal states at different temperatures. We show that such systems exhibit interesting quantum dynamics in which oscillators swap their thermal states due to correlation induced in the process of energy exchange and yield noise induced coherence. A photonic quantum heat engine (QHE) composed of two optical cavities can be modeled as coupled harmonic oscillators with time-dependent frequencies. Photons in the cavities become correlated during the engine operation. We show that the work done by such an engine is maximum if at the end of the cycle the oscillators swap numbers of excitations which can be achieved when the engine operates under the condition of parametric resonance. We also show that Carnot formula yields limiting efficiency for QHEs under general assumptions. Moreover, we show that, by making a canonical transformation, density operator of arbitrary n-mode Gaussian state can be written as a product of n thermal density operators describing independent collective excitations with different temperatures. Thus, operation of QHEs based on the correlated Gaussian states is equivalent to that based on uncorrelated thermal reservoirs. Our results deepen understanding of quantum evolution of mixed states which could be useful to design quantum machines with better performance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.10472 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Effective temperature of oscillators [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Photonic quantum heat engine composed of two op [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    We introduce a technique for calculating the density operator time evolution... exact solution for the quantum evolution of two and three coupled harmonic oscillators... photonic quantum heat engine... parametric resonance... Carnot formula yields limiting efficiency

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/ArithmeticFromLogic.lean embed_injective unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    oscillators swap their thermal states due to entanglement... noise induced coherence... work done by such an engine is maximum if... swap numbers of excitations

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Svidzinsky, Possible cooling effect in high- temperature superconductors, Phys

    A.A. Svidzinsky, Possible cooling effect in high- temperature superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 65, 144504 (2002)

    work page 2002

  2. [2]

    Jaeger, The Second Quantum Revolution: From En- tanglement to Quantum Computing and Other Super- Technologies, Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany (2018)

    L. Jaeger, The Second Quantum Revolution: From En- tanglement to Quantum Computing and Other Super- Technologies, Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    Carnot, R´eflections sur la puissance motrice du feu et sur les machines propres ´a d´evelopper cette puissance , Paris: Bachelier, (1824)

    S. Carnot, R´eflections sur la puissance motrice du feu et sur les machines propres ´a d´evelopper cette puissance , Paris: Bachelier, (1824)

    work page

  4. [4]

    Millen, A

    J. Millen, A. Xuereb, Perspective on quantum thermody- namics, New J. Phys. 18, 011002 (2016)

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    Binder, L.A

    F. Binder, L.A. Correa, C. Gogolin, J. Anders, and G. Adesso, Thermodynamics in the Quantum Regime , Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, V. 195 (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Kosloff and Y

    R. Kosloff and Y. Rezek, The Quantum Harmonic Otto Cycle, Entropy 19, 136 (2017)

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    Mukherjee and U

    V. Mukherjee and U. Divakaran, Many-body quantum thermal machines, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 33, 454001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Bhattacharjee, and A

    S. Bhattacharjee, and A. Dutta, Quantum thermal ma- chines and batteries , Eur. Phys. J. B 94, 239 (2021)

    work page 2021

Show all 73 references
  1. [9]

    Myers, O

    N.M. Myers, O. Abah, and S. Deffner, Quantum ther- modynamic devices: From theoretical proposals to exper- imental reality, A VS Quantum Sci. 4, 027101 (2022)

    2022

  2. [10]

    Scully, Extracting work from a single thermal bath via quantum negentropy , Phys

    M.O. Scully, Extracting work from a single thermal bath via quantum negentropy , Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 220601 (2001)

    2001

  3. [11]

    Scully, M

    M.O. Scully, M. Suhail Zubairy, G.S. Agarwal, and H. Walther, Extracting work from a single heat bath via van- ishing quantum coherence , Science 299, 862 (2003)

    2003

  4. [12]

    Dillenschneider, and E

    R. Dillenschneider, and E. Lutz, Energetics of quantum correlations, Europhys. Lett. 88, 50003 (2009)

    2009

  5. [13]

    Scully, Quantum Photocell: Using Quantum Co- herence to Reduce Radiative Recombination and Increase Efficiency, Phys

    M.O. Scully, Quantum Photocell: Using Quantum Co- herence to Reduce Radiative Recombination and Increase Efficiency, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 207701 (2010)

    2010

  6. [14]

    Huang, T

    X.L. Huang, T. Wang, and X. Yi, Effects of reservoir squeezing on quantum systems and work extraction , Phys. Rev. E 86, 051105 (2012)

    2012

  7. [15]

    Rahav, U

    S. Rahav, U. Harbola, and S. Mukamel, Heat fluctuations and coherences in a quantum heat engine , Phys. Rev. A 86, 043843 (2012)

    2012

  8. [16]

    Abah, and E

    O. Abah, and E. Lutz, Efficiency of heat engines coupled to nonequilibrium reservoirs, Europhys. Lett. 106, 20001 (2014)

    2014

  9. [17]

    Hardal, and ¨O.E

    A.U.C. Hardal, and ¨O.E. M¨ ustecaplıoglu,Superradiant quantum heat engine , Sci. Rep. 5, 12953 (2015)

    2015

  10. [18]

    Niedenzu, D

    W. Niedenzu, D. Gelbwaser-Klimovsky, A.G. Kofman, and G. Kurizki, On the operation of machines powered by quantum non-thermal baths, New J. Phys. 18, 083012 (2016)

    2016

  11. [19]

    Manzano, F

    G. Manzano, F. Galve, R. Zambrini, and J.M.R. Par- rondo, Entropy production and thermodynamic power of the squeezed thermal reservoir , Phys. Rev. E 93, 052120 (2016)

    2016

  12. [20]

    Agarwalla, J.-H

    B.K. Agarwalla, J.-H. Jiang, and D. Segal, Quantum effi- ciency bound for continuous heat engines coupled to non- canonical reservoirs, Phys. Rev. B 96, 104304 (2017)

    2017

  13. [21]

    Klaers, S

    J. Klaers, S. Faelt, A. Imamoglu, and E. Togan, Squeezed thermal reservoirs as a resource for a nanomechanical engine beyond the Carnot limit , Phys. Rev. X 7, 031044 (2017)

    2017

  14. [22]

    Rossnagel, O

    J. Rossnagel, O. Abah, F. Schmidt-Kaler, K. Singer, and E. Lutz, Nanoscale heat engine beyond the Carnot limit , Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 030602 (2014)

    2014

  15. [23]

    Gardas and S

    B. Gardas and S. Deffner, Thermodynamic universality of quantum Carnot engines , Phys. Rev. E 92, 042126 (2015)

    2015

  16. [24]

    Svidzinsky, K.E

    A.A. Svidzinsky, K.E. Dorfman, and M.O. Scully, En- hancing photovoltaic power by Fano induced coherence , Phys. Rev. A 84, 053818 (2011)

    2011

  17. [25]

    Scully, K.R

    M.O. Scully, K.R. Chapin, K.E. Dorfman, M. Kim, and A.A. Svidzinsky, Quantum heat engine power can be in- creased by noise-induced coherence, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 15097 (2011)

    2011

  18. [26]

    Svidzinsky, K.E

    A.A. Svidzinsky, K.E. Dorfman, and M.O. Scully, En- hancing photocell power by noiseinduced coherence , Co- herent Optical Phenomena 1, 7 (2012)

    2012

  19. [27]

    Dorfman, D.V

    K.E. Dorfman, D.V. Voronine, S. Mukamel, and M.O. Scully, Photosynthetic reaction center as a quantum heat engine, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110, 2746 (2013)

    2013

  20. [28]

    Feldmann and R

    T. Feldmann and R. Kosloff, Performance of discrete heat engines and heat pumps in finite time , Phys. Rev. E 61, 4774 (2000)

    2000

  21. [29]

    Geva and R

    E. Geva and R. Kosloff, A quantum-mechanical heat en- gine operating in finite time. A model consisting of spin- 1/2 systems as the working fluid, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 3054 (1992)

    1992

  22. [30]

    Henrich, F

    M.J. Henrich, F. Rempp, and G. Mahler, Quantum thermodynamic Otto machines: A spin-system approach , Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 151, 157 (2007)

    2007

  23. [31]

    Huang, H

    X.L. Huang, H. Xu, X.Y. Niu, and Y.D. Fu, A special entangled quantum heat engine based on the two-qubit Heisenberg XX model, Phys. Scr. 88, 065008 (2013)

    2013

  24. [32]

    Huang, Y

    X.L. Huang, Y. Liu, Z. Wang, and X.Y. Niu, Special coupled quantum Otto cycles , Euro. Phys. J. Plus 129, 4 (2014)

    2014

  25. [33]

    Feldmann and R

    T. Feldmann and R. Kosloff, Characteristics of the limit cycle of a reciprocating quantum heat engine , Phys. Rev. E 70, 046110 (2004)

    2004

  26. [34]

    O. Abah, J. Rossnagel, G. Jacob, S. Deffner, F. Schmidt- Kaler, K. Singer, and E. Lutz, Single-ion heat engine at maximum power, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 203006 (2012)

    2012

  27. [35]

    Abah and E

    O. Abah and E. Lutz, Optimal performance of a quantum Otto refrigerator, Europhys. Lett. 113, 60002 (2016)

    2016

  28. [36]

    Myers and S

    N.M. Myers and S. Deffner, Bosons outperform fermions: The thermodynamic advantage of symmetry , Phys. Rev. E 101, 012110 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    Myers, O

    N.M. Myers, O. Abah, and S. Deffner, Quantum Otto engines at relativistic energies, New J. Phys. 23, 105001 (2021)

    2021

  30. [38]

    H. Wang, S. Liu, and J. He, Performance analysis and parametric optimum criteria of an irreversible Bose–Otto engine, J. Appl. Phys. 105, 083534 (2009)

    2009

  31. [39]

    Myers, F.J

    N.M. Myers, F.J. Pena, O. Negrete, P. Vargas, G.D. Chiara, and S. Deffner, Boosting engine performance with Bose–Einstein condensation , New J. Phys. 24, 025001 (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    Myers and S

    N.M. Myers and S. Deffner, Thermodynamics of Statis- tical Anyons, PRX Quantum 2, 040312 (2021)

    2021

  33. [41]

    Myers, J

    N.M. Myers, J. McCready, and S. Deffner, Quantum Heat Engines with Singular Interactions , Symmetry 13, 978 12 (2021)

    2021

  34. [42]

    J. Wang, Z. Wu, and J. He, Quantum Otto engine of a two-level atom with single-mode fields , Phys. Rev. E 85, 041148 (2012)

    2012

  35. [43]

    H.T. Quan, P. Zhang, and C.P. Sun, Quantum heat en- gine with multilevel quantum systems , Phys. Rev. E 72, 056110 (2005)

    2005

  36. [44]

    Rossnagel, S.T

    J. Rossnagel, S.T. Dawkins, K.N. Tolazzi, O. Abah, E. Lutz, F. Schmidt-Kaler, and K. Singer, A single-atom heat engine , Science 352, 325 (2016)

    2016

  37. [45]

    Gelbwaser-Klimovsky, A

    D. Gelbwaser-Klimovsky, A. Bylinskii, D. Gangloff, R. I s- lam, A. Aspuru-Guzik, and V. Vuletic, Single-Atom Heat Machines Enabled by Energy Quantization , Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 170601 (2018)

    2018

  38. [46]

    Zhang, F

    K. Zhang, F. Bariani, and P. Meystre, Quantum op- tomechanical heat engine , Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 150602 (2014)

    2014

  39. [47]

    Zhang, F

    K. Zhang, F. Bariani, and P. Meystre, Theory of an optomechanical quantum heat engine , Phys. Rev. A 90, 023819 (2014)

    2014

  40. [48]

    Zhang and W

    K. Zhang and W. Zhang, Quantum optomechanical straight-twin engine , Phys. Rev. A 95, 053870 (2017)

    2017

  41. [49]

    Sothmann, R

    B. Sothmann, R. S´ anchez and A.N. Jordan, Quantum Nernst engines , EPL 107, 47003 (2014)

    2014

  42. [50]

    S´ anchez, B

    R. S´ anchez, B. Sothmann, and A.N. Jordan, Chiral Ther- moelectrics with Quantum Hall Edge States , Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 146801 (2015)

    2015

  43. [51]

    S´ anchez, B

    R. S´ anchez, B. Sothmann, and A.N. Jordan, Heat diode and engine based on quantum Hall edge states , New J. Phys. 17, 075006 (2015)

    2015

  44. [52]

    Y. Zou, Y. Jiang, Y. Mei, X. Guo, and S. Du, Quan- tum heat engine using electromagnetically induced trans- parency, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 050602 (2017)

    2017

  45. [53]

    Bouton, J

    Q. Bouton, J. Nettersheim, S. Burgardt, D. Adam, E. Lutz, and A. Widera, A quantum heat engine driven by atomic collisions , Nat. Commun. 12, 2063 (2021)

  46. [54]

    Klatzow, J.N

    J. Klatzow, J.N. Becker, P.M. Ledingham, C. Weinzetl, K.T. Kaczmarek, D.J. Saunders, J. Nunn, I.A. Walms- ley, R. Uzdin, and E. Poem, Experimental demonstration of quantum effects in the operation of microscopic heat engines, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 110601 (2019)

    2019

  47. [55]

    Peterson, T.B

    J.P.S. Peterson, T.B. Batalh˜ ao, M. Herrera, A.M. Souz a, R.S. Sarthour, I.S. Oliveira, and R.M. Serra, Experimen- tal Characterization of a Spin Quantum Heat Engine , Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 240601 (2019)

    2019

  48. [56]

    Rossnagel, S.T

    J. Rossnagel, S.T. Dawkins, K.N. Tolazzi, O. Abah, E. Lutz, F. Schmidt-Kaler, and K. Singer, A single-atom heat engine, Science 352, 325 (2016)

    2016

  49. [57]

    von Lindenfels, O

    D. von Lindenfels, O. Gr¨ab, C. T. Schmiegelow, V. Kaushal, J. Schulz, Mark T. Mitchison, J. Goold, F. Schmidt-Kaler, and U. G. Poschinger, Spin heat engine coupled to a harmonic-oscillator flywheel , Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 080602, (2019)

    2019

  50. [58]

    Van Horne, D

    N. Van Horne, D. Yum, T. Dutta, P. Hanggi, J. Gong, D. Poletti, and M. Mukherjee, Single-atom energy- conversion device with a quantum load , npj Quantum In- formation 6, 37 (2020)

    2020

  51. [59]

    J. Kim, S. Oh, D. Yang, J. Kim, M. Lee, and K. An, A photonic quantum engine driven by superradiance , Na- ture Photonics 16, 707 (2022)

    2022

  52. [60]

    Midolo, A

    L. Midolo, A. Schliesser, and A. Fiore, Nano-opto-electro- mechanical systems, Nature Nanotech 13, 11 (2018)

    2018

  53. [61]

    Aspelmeyer, T.J

    M. Aspelmeyer, T.J. Kippenberg, F. Marquardt, Cavity optomechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1391 (2014)

    2014

  54. [62]

    Teufel, T

    J.D. Teufel, T. Donner, Dale Li, J.W. Harlow, M.S. All- man, K. Cicak, A.J. Sirois, J.D. Whittaker, K.W. Lehn- ert, and R.W. Simmonds, Sideband cooling of microme- chanical motion to the quantum ground state , Nature 475, 359 (2011)

    2011

  55. [63]

    Peterson, T

    R. Peterson, T. Purdy, N. Kampel, et al., Laser cooling of a micromechanical membrane to the quantum backaction limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 063601 (2016)

    2016

  56. [64]

    S. Hong, R. Riedinger, I. Marinkovi´ c, et al., Hanbury Brown and Twiss interferometry of single phonons from an optomechanical resonator , Science 358, 203 (2017)

    2017

  57. [65]

    Kotler, G.A

    S. Kotler, G.A. Peterson, E. Shojaee, et al., Direct obser- vation of deterministic macroscopic entanglement , Sci- ence 372, 622 (2021)

    2021

  58. [66]

    Pusz, and S.L

    W. Pusz, and S.L. Woronowicz, Passive States and KMS States for General Quantum Systems , Commun. Math. Phys. 58, 273 (1978)

    1978

  59. [67]

    Alicki, The quantum open system as a model of the heat engine , J

    R. Alicki, The quantum open system as a model of the heat engine , J. of Physics A: Mathematical and General 12, L103 (1979)

    1979

  60. [68]

    Engel, T.R

    G.S. Engel, T.R. Calhoun, E.L. Read, T.-K. Ahn, T. Manˇ cal, Y.-C. Cheng, R.E. Blankenship, and G.R. Flem- ing, Evidence for wavelike energy transfer through quan- tumcoherence in photosynthetic systems, Nature 446, 782 (2007)

    2007

  61. [69]

    Lee, Y.C

    H. Lee, Y.C. Cheng, and G.R. Fleming, Coherence dy- namics in photosynthesis: Proteinprotection of excitonic coherence, Science 316, 1462 (2007)

    2007

  62. [70]

    Calhoun, N.S

    T.R. Calhoun, N.S. Ginsberg, G.S. Schlau-Cohen, Y.C. Cheng, M. Ballottari, R. Bassi, and G.R. Fleming, Quan- tum coherence enabled determination of the energyland- scape in light-harvesting complex II . J. Phys. Chem. B 113, 16291 (2009)

    2009

  63. [71]

    Pitaevskii and S

    L. Pitaevskii and S. Stringari, Bose-Einstein Condensa- tion, Clarendon Press, Oxford, (2003)

    2003

  64. [72]

    Unruh and R.M

    W.G. Unruh and R.M. Wald, What happens when an ac- celerating observer detects a Rindler particle , Phys. Rev. D 29, 1047 (1984)

    1984

  65. [73]

    Svidzinsky, A

    A.A. Svidzinsky, A. Azizi, J.S. Ben-Benjamin, M.O. Scully, and W. Unruh, Unruh and Cherenkov Radiation from a Negative Frequency Perspective , Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 063603 (2021)

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed May 23, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.