Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Revisiting altermagnetism in RuO2: a study of laser-pulse induced charge dynamics by time-domain terahertz spectroscopy

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that laser-pulse terahertz emission from epitaxial RuO2/permalloy bilayers shows no inverse altermagnetic spin-splitting effect in any orientation, so RuO2 is a normal metal rather than an altermagnet.

desk verdict A well-made negative result on RuO2 IASSE that is stronger on the emitter physics than on the altermagnetism claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.11240 v1 pith:7NNUEIFP submitted 2024-12-15 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

David T. Plouff , Laura Scheuer , Shreya Shrestha , Weipeng Wu , Nawsher J. Parvez , Subhash Bhatt , Xinhao Wang , Lars Gundlach
show 2 more authors
M. Benjamin Jungfleisch John Q. Xiao
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords altermagnetismRuO2terahertzemissioninversespinHalleffectaltermagneticspin-splittingelectricalanisotropicconductivityepitaxialthinfilmsspintronics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Altermagnetism is a proposed magnetic phase whose spin-split bands could enable antiferromagnetic spintronics, and rutile RuO2 is the most-studied candidate. This paper tries to detect the inverse altermagnetic spin-splitting effect (IASSE) in epitaxial RuO2/permalloy bilayers through laser-pulse-induced terahertz emission. In the crystal orientations where IASSE should appear, the measured emission shows no such signature, and field annealing does not produce one. The authors conclude that all observed emission is explained by the ordinary inverse spin Hall effect and by the non-magnetic electrical anisotropic conductivity of the rutile lattice. Taken together, the data imply that RuO2 is a normal metal rather than an altermagnet, while also demonstrating a simple way to make elliptically polarized terahertz light from the (101) orientation.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the angular dependence of terahertz emission from epitaxial RuO2/permalloy bilayers, measured by time-domain terahertz spectroscopy as the applied magnetic field angle $\theta_H$ is rotated. The inverse spin Hall effect (ISHE) converts an injected spin current into a transverse charge current, the inverse altermagnetic spin-splitting effect (IASSE) would add a non-relativistic spin-to-charge conversion tied to the N\'eel vector and to a spin current along [100], and the electrical anisotropic conductivity (EAC) arises from the ellipsoidal conductivity tensor of the rutile lattice ($\sigma_a = \sigma_b > \sigma_c$). The signal is decomposed by reversing the magnetic field by 180 degrees: the EAC contribution is the field-symmetric part, while ISHE and IASSE change sign with the spin polarization. This decomposition, together with the choice of (001), (100), (110), and (101) crystal orientations, is what allows the paper to separate the three mechanisms and conclude that only ISHE and EAC are present.

What would settle it

A direct magnetic probe of these identical epitaxial (100) and (101) RuO2 films, for example neutron diffraction or muon spin rotation, would settle the matter: observing an ordered magnetic moment with the predicted c-axis antiferromagnetic structure would falsify the paper's claim that RuO2 is a normal metal, while a null magnetic signal would confirm it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that RuO2 is not an altermagnet: when femtosecond laser pulses drive spin currents from a permalloy layer into epitaxial RuO2 films of four orientations, the resulting terahertz emission contains no contribution from the inverse altermagnetic spin-splitting effect in the (100) and (101) orientations where that contribution is expected. The angular pattern of the emission is instead fully accounted for by the relativistic inverse spin Hall effect plus the non-relativistic, non-magnetic electrical anisotropic conductivity, including a small anisotropy in the (100), (110), and (101) samples that the paper attributes to in-plane anisotropic conductivity modulating the ISHE current. Field annealing at 475 K in an 8 kG field, following the protocol of an earlier IASSE report, does not change the emission. The paper further reports that in the (101) sample the superposition of ISHE and EAC produces terahertz emission whose polarization is tunable between linear and elliptical by rotating the external magnetic field.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion rests on the assumption that epitaxial RuO2 films grown for this study are genuinely capable of hosting the altermagnetic order and that the predicted IASSE emission pattern from the earlier report would be large enough to be detected in the (100) and (101) orientations; if the films' magnetic order is destroyed by defects or stoichiometry, or if the true IASSE pattern differs, the null result does not disprove altermagnetism in RuO2.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If RuO2 is a normal metal, then spin-transport devices that rely on its altermagnetic spin-splitting, such as spin-splitter torques and IASSE-based terahertz emitters, will not work in this material as designed.
  • The small emission anisotropy seen in the (100), (110), and (101) samples, if caused by in-plane anisotropic conductivity, should be reproducible from purely electrical transport measurements and should not require any magnetic order.
  • Field annealing above the reported N\'eel temperature should have enhanced an IASSE signal by aligning antiferromagnetic domains; its absence after annealing supports the no-altermagnetism conclusion.
  • The (101) bilayer provides a magnetically controllable elliptical terahertz source whose chirality is set by the external field direction, a simpler alternative to hybrid emitters that require patterned photoconductive antennas.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct angle-resolved measurement of the in-plane conductivity of the same (100), (110), and (101) films would test the paper's explanation for the small emission anisotropy; if the anisotropy axis does not match the rutile a/c axes, that explanation would need revision.
  • The null result is specific to these epitaxial films; it does not rule out altermagnetism in other orientations, thicknesses, substrates, or in RuO2 with different stoichiometry, nor in other predicted altermagnetic materials.
  • The same decomposition technique applied to a material with independently confirmed altermagnetic order would calibrate the sensitivity of the measurement and sharpen the meaning of a null result.
  • Using IrO2 or adding a high-spin-orbit normal-metal layer, as the paper suggests, could turn the (101) elliptical emitter into a practical tunable terahertz polarization source over a wide bandwidth.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports time-domain THz emission measurements on epitaxial RuO2/permalloy bilayers with four RuO2 orientations: (001), (100), (110), and (101). The authors test for three proposed laser-induced charge-dynamics mechanisms: the inverse spin Hall effect (ISHE), the electrical anisotropic conductivity (EAC), and the inverse altermagnetic spin-splitting effect (IASSE). They find that the (001) response is isotropic; the (100), (110), and (101) responses show a small anisotropy that they attribute to in-plane EAC rather than IASSE; and the (101) sample exhibits an EAC component isolated by field-reversal averaging, which, when superposed with ISHE, produces THz emission whose polarization can be tuned between linear and elliptical by the external magnetic field. From the absence of any IASSE signature in the (100) and (101) films, before and after field annealing, the paper concludes that RuO2 is a normal metal and not an altermagnet.

Significance. If the null IASSE result is robust, this paper is a valuable addition to the current debate on RuO2 altermagnetism, complementing recent muon-spin-rotation, neutron-diffraction, and photoemission studies with an independent transport-based probe. The experimental strengths are substantial: the films show high crystalline quality by HRXRD (Laue oscillations and a single in-plane phase); the (110) orientation serves as a symmetry-forbidden control for IASSE; and the field-reversal average in Eq. (1) isolates the EAC component without free fitting parameters. The demonstration of a magnetic-field-tunable elliptical THz emitter from the ISHE+EAC superposition in the (101) sample is a useful and potentially practical result. However, the central conclusion is currently stated more strongly than the sensitivity analysis supports, and the manuscript needs either additional control measurements or a more cautious interpretation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II.A and Fig. 2] The central null result—the absence of IASSE in the (100) and (101) films—is not accompanied by a quantitative detection floor or a positive control. Fig. 2 reports polar plots without error bars, and the text states that the emission is 'essentially the same' before and after field annealing without specifying the smallest IASSE amplitude that could have been resolved. Without a noise floor or a reference sample with a known spin-to-charge conversion efficiency, the null result cannot distinguish 'RuO2 is not altermagnetic in these films' from 'IASSE, if present, falls below the sensitivity of this setup.' A calibration measurement or an explicit sensitivity estimate is needed before the absence of IASSE can be treated as evidence against altermagnetism.
  2. [Discussion, 'Absence of IASSE in RuO2'] The inference from 'no IASSE detected' to 'RuO2 is a normal metal and not an altermagnet' (Conclusion) goes beyond what the measurement establishes. The expected IASSE pattern is imported from Ref. [15], but the paper does not verify that the sputtered TiO2-epitaxial films, after the annealing protocol, actually possess the assumed antiferromagnetic order or that the domains are aligned by the field. The VSM control in SI Figure S5 shows only that the permalloy layer's magnetization is unchanged; it does not probe RuO2 order. The conclusion should be weakened to 'no IASSE was detected in these epitaxial films,' leaving open whether stoichiometry, defects, or the specific heterostructure geometry are responsible for the difference from Ref. [15].
  3. [Discussion, in-plane EAC attribution] The assignment of the small anisotropy in the (100) and (101) samples to in-plane EAC, rather than IASSE, rests on an unmeasured assumption. The authors state, 'we do not measure the direction-dependent in-plane conductivity of our samples' and rely on the bulk rutile conductivity anisotropy. Because this in-plane EAC mechanism is used to explain the same angular pattern that an IASSE contribution would produce, a direct in-plane transport measurement or a control experiment with a nonmagnetic anisotropic metal is needed to make the exclusion of IASSE load-bearing. For the (110) sample the IASSE-forbidden argument is stronger, but for (100) and (101) the ambiguity remains.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 2/Fig. 4] Add error bars or confidence intervals to the polar plots. Currently the small anisotropy in panels (b)–(d) of Fig. 2 and the angular dependence in Fig. 4 cannot be evaluated for statistical significance.
  2. [Eq. (1)] Equation (1) assumes that the ISHE and IASSE contributions are strictly odd under θH → θH + 180° while the EAC contribution is strictly even. This is a reasonable assumption, but a sentence acknowledging possible magnetoresistance or field-dependent conductivity in the RuO2 layer would clarify the limits of the isolation procedure.
  3. [Conclusion] The abstract says the results 'cast further doubt' on altermagnetism in RuO2, whereas the conclusion asserts that 'RuO2 is a normal metal and not an altermagnet.' These two statements have different epistemic strengths; aligning them with the null-result evidence would avoid overstatement.
  4. [SI Figure S6] The discussion in SI Figure S6 that Ref. [15]'s relation Jc ∝ Js × N is 'unlikely as the spin polarization is not involved' is presented without a derivation or a supporting reference. If this correction is important to the interpretation of the null result, it should be substantiated; otherwise it can be moved to a note.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the analysis uses a fixed symmetry decomposition and external benchmark predictions, not fitted inputs.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The central decomposition (Eq. 1) extracts the field-even EAC component as a fixed symmetry average, (E_xy(theta_H) + E_xy(theta_H+180))/2, not as a fit to the data; the residual is then compared against the expected field-odd ISHE/IASSE behavior. The expected IASSE angular pattern is imported from Ref. [15] as an external prediction, and the EAC mechanism from Ref. [22] was independently demonstrated in nonmagnetic RuO2/IrO2 heterostructures, so neither load-bearing input is defined in terms of the present paper's conclusion. The in-plane EAC interpretation of the small (100)/(110)/(101) anisotropy is an assumption based on bulk rutile conductivity, and the null IASSE result has sensitivity limitations (no explicit noise floor, no positive control), but these are evidentiary and correctness concerns, not circularity: no equation reduces the conclusion to its input, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The self-citations (Refs. [2], [21], [23]) are background reviews or comparison points for standard, externally established effects and are not load-bearing in the argument.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fit parameters: the EAC/ISHE decomposition is a fixed arithmetic average (Eq. 1), crystal angles come from X-ray diffraction, and the in-plane EAC explanation for the small anisotropy is qualitative rather than fitted. The paper introduces no new entities, forces, or conserved quantities; all mechanisms (ISHE, EAC, IASSE) are taken from prior literature.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Spintronic THz emission model: ET Hz is proportional to theta_SH times (Js x sigma) for the inverse spin Hall effect.
    Used to interpret the isotropic (001) emission and the field-angle dependence of all samples; this framework is taken from Ref. [21] and is standard in the field.
  • domain assumption EAC mechanism: Jc = sigma E with anisotropic conductivity sigma_a = sigma_b > sigma_c in rutile RuO2, producing THz emission without spin or magnetism.
    Needed to explain the (101) emission and the small anisotropy in other orientations; the conductivity anisotropy is asserted from the rutile structure and Ref. [22], not measured on these films.
  • domain assumption IASSE selection rules: a spin current along [100] with spin polarization along the Néel vector produces a transverse charge current in altermagnetic RuO2, so (100) and (101) films should emit anisotropically while (110) should not.
    This is the prediction under test, taken from Ref. [15] and the paper's SI Figure S6; if this geometry is wrong, the absence of signal is inconclusive.
  • domain assumption Field annealing at 475 K for 2 hours in an 8 kG field would align antiferromagnetic domains and enhance any IASSE signal.
    Used to argue that the unchanged emission after annealing rules out IASSE; assumes the Néel order, if present, couples to the cooling field (Section II.A).
  • domain assumption ISHE reverses sign when the external field is reversed, while EAC does not depend on field direction.
    Used in Eq. (1) to separate the EAC component by averaging emission at theta_H and theta_H + 180 degrees.
  • domain assumption The permalloy layer is magnetically saturated at 1.4 kG because VSM anisotropy fields are below 1 kG.
    Supports interpreting the theta_H dependence as spin-polarization rotation rather than magnetization magnitude changes (Discussion and SI Table I).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Revisiting altermagnetism in RuO2: a study of laser-pulse induced charge dynamics by time-domain terahertz spectroscopy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7NNUEIFP

@misc{pith2026241211240,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Revisiting altermagnetism in RuO2: a study of laser-pulse induced charge dynamics by time-domain terahertz spectroscopy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7NNUEIFP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.11240}
}
read the original abstract

Altermagnets are a recently discovered class of magnetic material with great potential for applications in the field of spintronics, owing to their non-relativistic spin-splitting and simultaneous antiferromagnetic order. One of the most studied candidates for altermagnetic materials is rutile structured RuO2. However, it has recently come under significant scrutiny as evidence emerged for its lack of any magnetic order. In this work, we study bilayers of epitaxial RuO2 and ferromagnetic permalloy (Fe19Ni81) by time-domain terahertz spectroscopy, probing for three possible mechanisms of laser-induced charge dynamics: the inverse spin Hall effect (ISHE), electrical anisotropic conductivity (EAC), and inverse altermagnetic spin-splitting effect (IASSE). We examine films of four common RuO2 layer orientations: (001), (100), (110), and (101). If RuO2 is altermagnetic, then the (100) and (101) oriented samples are expected to produce anisotropic emission from the IASSE, however, our results do not indicate the presence of IASSE for either as-deposited or field annealed samples. The THz emission from all samples is instead consistent with charge dynamics induced by only the relativistic ISHE and the non-relativistic and non-magnetic EAC, casting further doubt on the existence of altermagnetism in RuO2. In addition, we find that in the (101) oriented RuO2 sample, the combination of ISHE and EAC emission mechanisms produces THz emission which is tunable between linear and elliptical polarization by modulation of the external magnetic field.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.11240 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Rutile RuO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Time-domain traces of the emitted THz wave electric field components of (101) oriented [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. E [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Interplay between altermagnetism and topological superconductivity on an unconventional superconducting platform

    cond-mat.supr-con 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A d-wave altermagnet coupled to a p-wave superconductor induces gapless topological superconductivity with Majorana flat edge modes, nodal-line superconductivity, and a hybrid phase with coexisting dispersive and flat...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

24 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [15]

    Y. Liu, H. Bai, Y. Song, Z. Ji, S. Lou, Z. Zhang, C. Song, and Q. Jin, Inverse altermagnetic spin splitting effect-induced terahertz emission in ruo2, Advanced Optical Materials 11, 2300177 (2023)

    work page 2023

  2. [1]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging research landscape of altermagnetism, Physical Review X 12, 040501 (2022)

    2022

  3. [2]

    M. B. Jungfleisch, W. Zhang, and A. Hoffmann, Perspectives of antiferromagnetic spintronics, Physics Letters A 382, 865 (2018). 16 FIG. S4. VSM. Magnetization hysteresis loops for samples with 5 nm thick RuO 2 layer, measured along both flat edge directions. TABLE I. Magnetic properties of as-deposited samples. (hkl) RuO 2 thickness (nm) H c (G) H a (G) (...

    work page 2018

  4. [3]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Momentum-dependent spin splitting by collinear antiferromagnetic ordering, journal of the physical society of japan 88, 123702 (2019)

    2019

  5. [4]

    L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, E. I. Rashba, and A. Zunger, Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low-z antiferromagnets, Physical Review B 102, 014422 TABLE II. Magnetic properties of field annealed samples. (hkl) RuO 2 thickness (nm) H c (G) H a (G) (100) 12 25 1000 (100) 5 50 800 17 FIG. S5. VSM post field annealing . (a) 12 nm th...

    work page 2020

  6. [5]

    ˇSmejkal, R

    L. ˇSmejkal, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal sym- metry breaking and spontaneous hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets, Science advances 6, eaaz8809 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [6]

    I. I. Mazin, K. Koepernik, M. D. Johannes, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, and L.ˇSmejkal, Prediction of unconventional magnetism in doped fesb2, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, e2108924118 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [7]

    Ryden and A

    W. Ryden and A. Lawson, Magnetic susceptibility of iro2 and ruo2, The Journal of Chemical Physics 52, 6058 (1970)

    work page 1970

Show all 24 references
  1. [8]

    Berlijn, P

    T. Berlijn, P. C. Snijders, O. Delaire, H.-D. Zhou, T. A. Maier, H.-B. Cao, S.-X. Chi, M. Mat- 18 suda, Y. Wang, M. R. Koehler, et al., Itinerant antiferromagnetism in ruo 2, Physical review letters 118, 077201 (2017)

    2017

  2. [9]

    H. Bai, L. Han, X. Feng, Y. Zhou, R. Su, Q. Wang, L. Liao, W. Zhu, X. Chen, F. Pan, et al., Observation of spin splitting torque in a collinear antiferromagnet ruo 2, Physical Review Letters 128, 197202 (2022)

    2022

  3. [10]

    A. Bose, N. J. Schreiber, R. Jain, D.-F. Shao, H. P. Nair, J. Sun, X. S. Zhang, D. A. Muller, E. Y. Tsymbal, D. G. Schlom, et al., Tilted spin current generated by the collinear antiferro- magnet ruthenium dioxide, Nature Electronics 5, 267 (2022)

    2022

  4. [11]

    Z. Feng, X. Zhou, L. ˇSmejkal, L. Wu, Z. Zhu, H. Guo, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, X. Wang, H. Yan, P. Qin, et al., An anomalous hall effect in altermagnetic ruthenium dioxide, Nature Electronics 5, 735 (2022)

    2022

  5. [12]

    Y. Guo, J. Zhang, Z. Zhu, Y.-y. Jiang, L. Jiang, C. Wu, J. Dong, X. Xu, W. He, B. He, et al., Direct and inverse spin splitting effects in altermagnetic ruo2, Advanced Science , 2400967 (2024)

    2024

  6. [13]

    Karube, T

    S. Karube, T. Tanaka, D. Sugawara, N. Kadoguchi, M. Kohda, and J. Nitta, Observation of spin-splitter torque in collinear antiferromagnetic ruo 2, Physical review letters 129, 137201 (2022)

    2022

  7. [14]

    Liao, Y.-C

    C.-T. Liao, Y.-C. Wang, Y.-C. Tien, S.-Y. Huang, and D. Qu, Separation of inverse altermag- netic spin-splitting effect from inverse spin hall effect in ruo 2, Physical Review Letters 133, 056701 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    H. Bai, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhou, P. Chen, C. Wan, L. Han, W. Zhu, S. Liang, Y. Su, X. Han, et al., Efficient spin-to-charge conversion via altermagnetic spin splitting effect in antiferromagnet ruo 2, Physical review letters 130, 216701 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    Fedchenko, J

    O. Fedchenko, J. Min´ ar, A. Akashdeep, S. W. D’Souza, D. Vasilyev, O. Tkach, L. Odenbreit, Q. Nguyen, D. Kutnyakhov, N. Wind, et al., Observation of time-reversal symmetry breaking in the band structure of altermagnetic ruo2, Science advances 10, eadj4883 (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    Hiraishi, H

    M. Hiraishi, H. Okabe, A. Koda, R. Kadono, T. Muroi, D. Hirai, and Z. Hiroi, Nonmagnetic ground state in ruo 2 revealed by muon spin rotation, Physical Review Letters 132, 166702 19 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    Keßler, L

    P. Keßler, L. Garcia-Gassull, A. Suter, T. Prokscha, Z. Salman, D. Khalyavin, P. Manuel, F. Orlandi, I. I. Mazin, R. Valent ´ ı,et al., Absence of magnetic order in ruo2: insights from µ sr spectroscopy and neutron diffraction, npj Spintronics 2, 50 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    J. Liu, J. Zhan, T. Li, J. Liu, S. Cheng, Y. Shi, L. Deng, M. Zhang, C. Li, J. Ding, et al., Absence of altermagnetic spin splitting character in rutile oxide ruo 2, Physical Review Letters 133, 176401 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    W. Wu, C. Yaw Ameyaw, M. F. Doty, and M. B. Jungfleisch, Principles of spintronic thz emitters, Journal of Applied Physics 130 (2021)

    2021

  14. [22]

    Zhang, Y

    S. Zhang, Y. Cui, S. Wang, H. Chen, Y. Liu, W. Qin, T. Guan, C. Tian, Z. Yuan, L. Zhou, et al., Nonrelativistic and nonmagnetic terahertz-wave generation via ultrafast current control in anisotropic conductive heterostructures, Advanced Photonics 5, 056006 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    W. Wu, W. Acuna, Z. Huang, X. Wang, L. Gundlach, M. F. Doty, J. M. Zide, and M. B. Jungfleisch, Hybrid terahertz emitter for pulse shaping and chirality control, arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.05875 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    M. Sato, T. Higuchi, N. Kanda, K. Konishi, K. Yoshioka, T. Suzuki, K. Misawa, and M. Kuwata-Gonokami, Terahertz polarization pulse shaping with arbitrary field control, Na- ture Photonics 7, 724 (2013). 20

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.