Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Zero-Shot Prompting Approaches for LLM-based Graphical User Interface Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.11328 v1 pith:G4LIU6FA submitted 2024-12-15 cs.SE

classification cs.SE
keywords generationprototypespromptingapproachesdevelopmenteffectivenessevaluategenerated
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Graphical user interface (GUI) prototyping represents an essential activity in the development of interactive systems, which are omnipresent today. GUI prototypes facilitate elicitation of requirements and help to test, evaluate, and validate ideas with users and the development team. However, creating GUI prototypes is a time-consuming process and often requires extensive resources. While existing research for automatic GUI generation focused largely on resource-intensive training and fine-tuning of LLMs, mainly for low-fidelity GUIs, we investigate the potential and effectiveness of Zero-Shot (ZS) prompting for high-fidelity GUI generation. We propose a Retrieval-Augmented GUI Generation (RAGG) approach, integrated with an LLM-based GUI retrieval re-ranking and filtering mechanism based on a large-scale GUI repository. In addition, we adapt Prompt Decomposition (PDGG) and Self-Critique (SCGG) for GUI generation. To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed ZS prompting approaches for GUI generation, we extensively evaluated the accuracy and subjective satisfaction of the generated GUI prototypes. Our evaluation, which encompasses over 3,000 GUI annotations from over 100 crowd-workers with UI/UX experience, shows that SCGG, in contrast to PDGG and RAGG, can lead to more effective GUI generation, and provides valuable insights into the defects that are produced by the LLMs in the generated GUI prototypes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Non-programmers Assessing AI-Generated Code: A Case Study of Business Users Analyzing Data

    cs.HC 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Non-programmer business users often fail to spot critical mistakes in AI-generated data analyses, even when explicitly warned and incentivized.

  2. AI Prototyper: A Figma Plugin for Decomposition-Based GUI Prototyping with LLMs

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    An LLM-based Figma plugin with a human-editable feature list and RAG component retrieval produced more completed prototypes and higher expert quality ratings than manual Figma in a small Thai-language pilot.

Pith tools