Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 87 references

Emergent electrostatics in planar XY spin models: the bridge connecting topological order with broken $U(1)$ symmetry

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This review claims that topological order, understood as the freezing of the global topological sector, induces broken U(1) symmetry in the low-temperature 2D XY model, in a generalized dynamical sense.

desk verdict A coherent, well-documented review of the author's own program on broken U(1) symmetry and topological nonergodicity in XY models, but the causal bridge is conditional for the physical 2DXY model. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.12186 v2 pith:J7P63OL2 submitted 2024-12-13 cond-mat.stat-mech

Michael F. Faulkner This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords emergentelectrostaticstopologicalnonergodicitygeneralsymmetrybreakingBerezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thoulesstransition2DXYmodelsectorlattice-fieldelectrolyteevent-chainMonteCarlo
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the Berezinskii–Kosterlitz–Thouless transition is not only a vortex-unbinding transition but also an ergodicity-breaking transition: below it, the 2D XY model genuinely breaks its U(1) symmetry, in a generalized dynamical sense, and the cause is topological order understood as topological nonergodicity. The bridge is an emergent electrostatic field theory that maps the short-range spin model to a lattice electric field: vortices become local charges, internal global twists become a topological sector, and spin waves become a gauge field carrying the Coulomb interaction locally. Under local Brownian dynamics below the transition, the topological sector is frozen, which freezes the directional phase of the magnetization; the system therefore picks a spin direction in the thermodynamic limit even though the expected order parameter is zero, so the Mermin–Wagner–Hohenberg theorem is not violated. If this is right, the persistent phase coherence seen in superconducting, superfluid, magnetic, and cold-atom films is not a finite-size artefact but a genuine symmetry-broken phase stabilized by topology.

What carries the argument

The central object is the emergent lattice electric field $E(r)$, obtained by rotating the phase-difference field of the spins; it satisfies a lattice Gauss law $\hat{\nabla}\cdot E=J\rho$ whose divergences are vortices. The field is decomposed by Helmholtz–Hodge into an irrotational Coulomb part $-\nabla\phi$, a uniform harmonic mode $\bar{E}$, and a purely rotational gauge field $\hat{\nabla}\times Q$; the harmonic mode splits into a low-energy polarization field $\bar{E}_p$ and a topological sector $2\pi J w/L$, where $w\in\mathbb{Z}^2$ counts internal global spin twists around the torus. The topological sector is the workhorse of the argument: it is the additional degree of freedom missing from the BKT and Salzberg–Prager pictures, its freezing defines topological nonergodicity through the long-time topological stability $\gamma_w$, and its restoration by global-twist Monte Carlo moves restores both topological ergodicity and U(1) symmetry. The exact map to the augmented electrostatic Boltzmann distribution is derived for the harmonic XY model; in the physical 2DXY model the same Coulomb physics holds to first order, softened by the cosine couplings.

What would settle it

Run the local Metropolis simulation of the 2DXY model at $\beta>\beta_{\mathrm{BKT}}$ and measure the directional mixing timescale $\tau_{\rm mix}$ from the Cramér–von Mises statistic together with the variance of the topological sector $w$ as functions of system size $N$; if $\tau_{\rm mix}$ grows slower than any positive power of $N$, or if $w$ changes on timescales that do not diverge, the claimed topological nonergodicity and topology-induced symmetry breaking are absent.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that low-temperature topological order in the planar XY model is a dynamical phenomenon: the topological sector $w\in\mathbb{Z}^2$, the integer pair describing internal global twists of the spin field around the torus, has zero fluctuations in the thermodynamic limit under local Brownian dynamics below the transition, even though the Boltzmann measure assigns it nonzero variance at every nonzero temperature. This frozen sector is the same mechanism that breaks the U(1) symmetry: the global phase $\varphi_m$ of the order parameter mixes on a timescale that diverges with system size, while the expected norm $E\lVert m\rVert$ decays only as a slow power of $N$, so the directional fluctuations are asymptotically smaller than the norm. The emergent electrostatic field theory carries the argument because it contains both the local topological defects (vortices as charges in the Gauss law $\hat{\nabla}\cdot E=J\rho$) and the global topological sector in the harmonic mode $\bar{E}=\bar{E}_p+2\pi J w/L$, making explicit how a charged vortex that winds around the torus changes the global twist. The paper concludes that topological order defined by topological nonergodicity induces the broken U(1) symmetry, with supplemental global-twist dynamics restoring both symmetry and ergodicity on non-divergent timescales at all nonzero temperatures.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing step is the transfer of the exact emergent-electrolyte field theory from the harmonic XY model to the physical 2DXY model: if the non-linear cosine couplings change the global topological-sector dynamics rather than merely softening the Coulomb interactions, the claimed bridge between topological order and broken U(1) symmetry in the physical model is weakened.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Below the BKT transition, the topological sector is confined and frozen: a neutral vortex pair cannot separate by more than half the system through local dynamics, so $w$ does not change; above the transition, topological-sector fluctuations turn on at $\beta_{\mathrm{BKT}}$.
  • The symmetry-breaking phase of the 2DXY model is real in the generalized sense: the order-parameter direction is arbitrarily chosen and stable on timescales diverging with system size, explaining persistent phase coherence in experimental BKT systems without invoking spontaneous symmetry breaking.
  • Critical slowing down should accompany the transition in local dynamics: the flattening of the order-parameter distribution near $\beta_{\mathrm{BKT}}$ and the slow phase dynamics explain strongly autocorrelated resistance in superconducting films near the transition.
  • Global-defect moves, such as global spin twists or shifts of the harmonic mode, are practical tools: they restore ergodicity and symmetry on non-divergent timescales and provide unbiased estimators of the topological susceptibility.
  • The short-range–long-range paradox is resolved: long-range Coulomb interactions among vortices emerge from short-range spin interactions through local propagation by the auxiliary gauge field, so the model is a local theory of an emergent electrolyte.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the topological sector is the physical cause of the frozen phase direction, then any local dynamics, including the Brownian motion of real vortices in films, should show a divergence of the phase-mixing time with system size below $T_{\mathrm{BKT}}$; this could be tested in Josephson-junction arrays with tunable linear size.
  • The same general-symmetry-breaking criterion, directional fluctuations asymptotically smaller than the expected norm, could be transferred to other two-dimensional continuous symmetries, such as hexatic orientational order in two-dimensional melting, predicting topology-induced orientational freezing; the paper does not itself apply it there.
  • Because the exact mapping holds for the harmonic XY model, the cleanest quantitative tests of the bridge would use the generalized lattice-field electrolyte, where the predicted freezing of the topological sector is exact; deviations in the physical 2DXY model would localize where the cosine nonlinearity matters.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This review paper proposes a unified framework connecting topological order and broken U(1) symmetry in planar XY models. The author reviews prior work on general symmetry breaking in the 2DXY model, in which low-temperature order corresponds to asymptotically slow directional mixing of the order parameter, and then develops an emergent electrostatic field theory. The exact mapping is constructed for the 2D harmonic XY (HXY) model, whose Boltzmann distribution is expressed as a constrained lattice-field electrolyte, and is compared with the Maggs–Rossetto generalized lattice-field electrolyte. A new measure, long-time topological stability, is introduced to characterize topological order as topological nonergodicity. The paper argues that supplemental global-twist dynamics restore both topological ergodicity and U(1) symmetry on non-divergent timescales, and concludes that topological order induces broken U(1) symmetry at low temperature. The appendices contain careful derivations of the discrete vector calculus, polarization formulas, and lattice Green's function, and the paper provides code and data archives.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper provides a conceptually important unification: the BKT transition would simultaneously be a vortex-unbinding transition, an ergodicity-breaking transition, and the onset of a generalized form of symmetry breaking, with emergent electrostatics as the connecting mechanism. The review also offers a plausible explanation for strongly autocorrelated experimental signals near BKT transitions. The strengths of the manuscript include detailed appendices with explicit derivations, reproducible code with fixed commit hashes, deposited simulation data, and a clear discussion of the relation between the HXY model, the Villain model, and the generalized lattice-field electrolyte. However, the exact electrolyte mapping is established only for the HXY model, and the manuscript's own caveats state that the corresponding 2DXY expressions hold only approximately; the central causal claim for the physical 2DXY model therefore rests on evidence that is weaker than the appendix-level rigor.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section V H, Eq. (70), Figure 16] The central step-function claim gamma_w^local(beta)=1 for beta>beta_BKT and 0 otherwise is supported by Figure 16, whose caption states that errors are large and not shown because each estimate is a ratio of two simulation estimates. Without error bars or a quantitative criterion for the step, the sharpness and location of the transition in the topological-stability measure are not established, especially in the transition region where the text itself notes noisy estimates and possible critical slowing down. The text subsequently treats Eq. (70) as established when it concludes at the end of Section V H that topological order induces broken U(1) symmetry, so a load-bearing numerical claim currently lacks uncertainty quantification.
  2. [Sections V C, V E, and IV C] The exact emergent-electrostatic mapping is derived for the 2DHXY model, while Section V E states that Eq. (51) cannot be written exactly in the 2DXY case and Section V C states that the 2DXY global twist-relaxation field does not always correspond to the global topological defects. The 2DXY conclusions in Sections V G and V H are therefore supported by 'mimic' dynamics, renormalization-group arguments, and first-order mappings rather than by the exact electrolyte field theory. In addition, a zero-cost global rotation of all spins would restore U(1) phase mixing on a non-divergent timescale without changing the topological sector, and the paper does not report this control, nor the topological-sector behavior under event-chain dynamics that it claims restores U(1) symmetry. The causal statement that topological nonergodicity 'induces' broken U(1) in the physical 2DXY model requires either an explicit demonstration of a shared mechanism or a restriction of the claim to the HXY/electrolyte representation.
  3. [Section V H, definition below Eq. (68)] Topological order is defined as long-time topological stability, with the text stating 'This equivalently defines topological order within the present framework.' Because topological nonergodicity is incorporated into the definition, the statement that topological order induces broken U(1) symmetry is partly a consequence of the chosen definitions rather than an independently demonstrated connection. The paper should separate the definitional equivalence from the physical assertion that the standard notion of topological order, e.g., the spin-stiffness universal jump of Section V F, coincides with the new nonergodicity measure; otherwise the central 'bridge' conclusion risks circularity.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section IV D] The phrase 'em sombrero potential' appears to be a typographical error for 'the sombrero potential'.
  2. [Appendix A] The Dryad data DOI is written as https://doi.org/0.5061/dryad.v15dv427n, which appears to be missing a digit; it should likely be https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.v15dv427n.
  3. [Figure 16 caption] The statement that errors are large and not shown should also appear in the main text near Eq. (70), since the figure is the primary numerical support for the topological nonergodicity claim.
  4. [Section IV C] The sentence 'This confirmed equation (23) and the singular thermodynamic limit of the low-temperature phase fluctuations, due to nonzero long-time directional stability' is dense; splitting it would clarify that the confirmation applies to the Metropolis dynamics case.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the review's synthesis traces to reproducible prior results and explicit definitions, not to a fit or to a self-citation chain that makes the conclusion equal to its inputs.

full rationale

No circular step can be exhibited. The central quantity 'topological order' is explicitly redefined as topological nonergodicity (Section II.D.14: 'topological nonergodicity is defined by long-time topological stability. This equivalently defines topological order within the present framework'), but this is a definition, not a derived prediction. Broken U(1) symmetry is defined independently as asymptotically slow directional mixing of the order-parameter phase (Section II.D.5), so topological order is not defined in terms of the U(1) result. The paper's 'therefore induces' claim (Section V.H) rests on the empirical and renormalization-group observation that both topological-sector fluctuations and U(1) phase fluctuations freeze under local Metropolis dynamics and are both restored by the same supplemental global-twist moves. Co-occurrence of two nonergodicities is a substantive, debatable inference about mechanism, not an equation reducing to a definition. The HXY-to-electrolyte mapping is derived explicitly, while the 2DXY extension is flagged as approximate ('equation (51) cannot be written exactly in the 2DXY case'), so the approximation is stated as a limitation rather than smuggled in as a prediction. The author's prior works [44,45,46] are load-bearing for the review, but they carry released code, data repositories, and external anchors (Vallat-Beck, Maggs-Rossetto, Bramwell-Holdsworth), which count as independent evidence under the review rubric. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors, and no known result is merely renamed as a new derivation. The causal 'induces' inference may be challenged on logical or approximation grounds, but it is not circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, conserved quantities, or dimensions are introduced. The topological sector, polarization field, and global spin twists are prior concepts. The only new object is the formal long-time topological stability measure, which is an observable statistic, not a physical entity.

free parameters (2)
  • c = 1.8456
    Empirical constant in the Bramwell-Holdsworth finite-size scaling E||m|| = (cN)^(-1/16), used to define the finite-size transition temperature beta*(N) in Section IV A.
  • sigma_noise = tuned for acceptance rate about 0.6
    Metropolis noise variance chosen by hand to approximate Brownian spin dynamics in the simulations reviewed in Sections IV B-C.
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption Mermin-Wagner-Hohenberg theorem: no spontaneous symmetry breaking at nonzero temperature in the 2D XY model
    Invoked in Section IV A to set up the paradox that motivates general symmetry breaking.
  • domain assumption BKT theory of vortex unbinding and algebraic correlations
    Background framework reviewed in Sections I and IV A; the paper builds on, not re-derives, this theory.
  • domain assumption The 2DHXY model retains a BKT transition at 1/(beta^elec_BKT) approximately 1.351J
    Used in Sections V A and V F to benchmark the harmonic XY model as a proxy for the 2DXY model.
  • standard math Helmholtz-Hodge decomposition of lattice vector fields into irrotational, harmonic, and rotational parts
    Central to the emergent-field representation, equations (30)-(38) and Appendix C.
  • domain assumption Local Metropolis dynamics converge to Brownian dynamics for harmonic oscillators and, by extension, for this model
    Section IV B relies on this to interpret Metropolis simulation variance as reflecting physical Brownian spin dynamics.
  • domain assumption Renormalization-group arguments extend 2DHXY/electrolyte topological-sector results to the 2DXY model
    Section V G-H uses RG arguments to transfer exact results from the harmonic model to the 2DXY model, despite the non-linear cosine couplings.
  • ad hoc to paper The directional simulation variance obeys <s^2_phi> proportional to tau/tau_mix for tau < tau_mix under diffusive Metropolis dynamics
    Adopted in Section IV C to convert measured Cramer-von Mises scaling into the claimed tau_mix ~ N^{z/2} scaling.
  • domain assumption Expected topological-sector variance Var[w] is finite and nonzero at all nonzero temperatures
    Used in Section V H to define long-time topological stability; the paper supplies a restricted-ensemble calculation but relies on simulation for the non-restricted ensemble.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Emergent electrostatics in planar XY spin models: the bridge connecting topological order with broken $U(1)$ symmetry." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/J7P63OL2

@misc{pith2026241212186,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Emergent electrostatics in planar XY spin models: the bridge connecting topological order with broken $U(1)$ symmetry},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/J7P63OL2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.12186}
}
read the original abstract

Topological phases have been a central focus of condensed-matter physics for over 50 years. Along with many experimental applications, they have provided much intellectual interest due to their characterization via some form of topological ordering, as opposed to the symmetry-breaking ordering of conventional continuous phase transitions. This distinction is most subtle in the case of the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless (BKT) transition as its experimental realizations appear to break U(1) symmetry at low temperature. It also presents two further paradoxes: i) its prototypical short-range interacting planar XY spin model behaves as an emergent long-range interacting electrolyte; ii) its topological ordering is not accompanied by a topological nonergodicity within the BKT picture. This review paper addresses these three interconnected questions. We review a series of papers that demonstrate that U(1) symmetry is indeed broken, but within a broader framework than that traditionally used to characterize broken symmetry. We discuss recovery of this symmetry by breaking velocity-symmetry in a deterministic Markov process. We then expand on a modern field theory of the emergent electrolyte that maps directly from the spin field to an emergent lattice electric field governed by an augmented electrostatic Boltzmann distribution. This local model of electrolyte physics resolves both the short-range-long-range paradox and the question of topological nonergodicity - as in contrast with the BKT picture, it describes global topological defects and their nonergodic freezing by the topological ordering. It also connects the broken U(1) symmetry with the topological ordering, providing a comprehensive framework for broken symmetry at the transition. We introduce long-time topological stability as a measure of topological nonergodicity - within a general framework for weakly broken ergodicity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.12186 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Spontaneous magnetization [defined in equation (8)] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Zero-field Ising magnetization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Schematic of the expected Ising magnetization as a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (14 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Example of the event-chain algorithm continuously [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Evolutions of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. ECDFs [defined in equation (24)] of the global [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Local Metropolis dynamics break symmetry through [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Supplemental global-twist dynamics [defined below equation (26)] ensure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. (a)-(d) Any spin configuration decomposes into contributions from three principal excitations: local topological defects [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Global topological defects can be generated by deconfined local topological defects. The red arrows are the spins. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. (a)-(c) To complement figure 9, we decompose the spin-difference field of the 2DHXY configuration of figure 9(a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Single 2DHXY/2DXY spin rotations can lead to emergent-charge hops. The red arrows are spins. The red dashed lines [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Electric-field dynamics in the generalized lattice-field electrolyte. Each red/white/gray circle represents positive/ze [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. The response functions defined in Section V F capture the BKT transition with a universal jump at the phase [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Trace plots of the topological sector (and various analogous quantities) reflect the strikingly different topological [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. For systems restricted to local Metropolis electric-field/spin dynamics, the finite topological stability [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. The unbiased estimates (used in figure 16 to demonstrate the topological nonergodicity of the low-temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_17.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

  1. [44]

    Topological-sector fluctuations and er- godicity breaking at the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition,

    M. F. Faulkner, S. T. Bramwell, and P. C. W. Holdsworth, “Topological-sector fluctuations and er- godicity breaking at the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition,” Phys. Rev. B , vol. 91, p. 155412, 2015

    work page 2015

  2. [46]

    Symmetry breaking at a topological phase transition,

    M. F. Faulkner, “Symmetry breaking at a topological phase transition,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 109, p. 085405, 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [1]

    Magnetic monopoles in spin ice,

    C. Castelnovo, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, “Magnetic monopoles in spin ice,” Nature, vol. 451, p. 42, 2008

    2008

  4. [2]

    Signature of magnetic monopole and Dirac string dynamics in spin ice,

    L. D. C. Jaubert and P. C. W. Holdsworth, “Signature of magnetic monopole and Dirac string dynamics in spin ice,” Nat. Phys. , vol. 5, p. 258, 2009

    2009

  5. [3]

    Measurement of the charge and current of magnetic monopoles in spin ice,

    S. T. Bramwell, S. R. Giblin, S. Calder, R. Aldus, D. Prabhakaran, and T. Fennell, “Measurement of the charge and current of magnetic monopoles in spin ice,” Nature, vol. 461, p. 956, 2009

    2009

  6. [4]

    Geometrical Frustration in the Ferromagnetic Pyrochlore Ho 2Ti2O7,

    M. J. Harris, S. T. Bramwell, D. F. McMorrow, T. Zeiske, and K. W. Godfrey, “Geometrical Frustration in the Ferromagnetic Pyrochlore Ho 2Ti2O7,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 79, p. 2554, 1997

    1997

  7. [5]

    Deviations from Ohm’s Law in Weak Elec- trolytes,

    L. Onsager, “Deviations from Ohm’s Law in Weak Elec- trolytes,” J. Chem. Phys. , vol. 2, p. 599, 1934

    1934

  8. [6]

    Onsager’s Wien effect on a lattice,

    V. Kaiser, S. T. Bramwell, P. C. W. Holdsworth, and R. Moessner, “Onsager’s Wien effect on a lattice,” Nat. Mater., vol. 12, p. 1033, 2013

    2013

Show all 87 references
  1. [7]

    ac Wien Effect in Spin Ice, Manifest in Nonlinear, Nonequilibrium Susceptibility,

    V. Kaiser, S. T. Bramwell, P. C. W. Holdsworth, and R. Moessner, “ac Wien Effect in Spin Ice, Manifest in Nonlinear, Nonequilibrium Susceptibility,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 115, p. 037201, 2015

    2015

  2. [8]

    Destruction of Long-range Order in One-dimensional and Two-dimensional Systems having a Continuous Symmetry Group I. Classical Systems,

    V. L. Berezinskii, “Destruction of Long-range Order in One-dimensional and Two-dimensional Systems having a Continuous Symmetry Group I. Classical Systems,” Sov. Phys.–JETP, vol. 32, p. 493, 1971

    1971

  3. [9]

    Ordering, metasta- bility and phase transitions in two-dimensional systems,

    J. M. Kosterlitz and D. J. Thouless, “Ordering, metasta- bility and phase transitions in two-dimensional systems,” J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. , vol. 6, p. 1181, 1973

    1973

  4. [10]

    Theory of Two- Dimensional Melting,

    B. I. Halperin and D. R. Nelson, “Theory of Two- Dimensional Melting,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 41, p. 121, 1978

    1978

  5. [11]

    Melting and the vector Coulomb gas in two dimensions,

    A. P. Young, “Melting and the vector Coulomb gas in two dimensions,” Phys. Rev. B , vol. 19, p. 1855, 1979

    1979

  6. [12]

    Two-step melting in two dimensions: First-order liquid-hexatic transition,

    E. P. Bernard and W. Krauth, “Two-step melting in two dimensions: First-order liquid-hexatic transition,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 107, p. 155704, 2011

    2011

  7. [13]

    Two-Dimensional Melting of Colloidal Hard Spheres,

    A. L. Thorneywork, J. L. Abbott, D. G. A. L. Aarts, and R. P. A. Dullens, “Two-Dimensional Melting of Colloidal Hard Spheres,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 118, p. 158001, 2017

    2017

  8. [14]

    Transport signatures of fragile-glass dynamics in the melting of the two-dimensional vortex lattice,

    I. Maccari, B. K. Pokharel, J. Terzic, S. Dutta, J. Je- sudasan, P. Raychaudhuri, J. Lorenzana, C. De Michele, C. Castellani, L. Benfatto, and D. Popovi´ c, “Transport signatures of fragile-glass dynamics in the melting of the two-dimensional vortex lattice,” Phys. Rev. B , vo...

    2023

  9. [15]

    From quantum to thermal topological-sector fluctuations of strongly interacting bosons in a ring lattice,

    T. Roscilde, M. F. Faulkner, S. T. Bramwell, and P. C. W. Holdsworth, “From quantum to thermal topological-sector fluctuations of strongly interacting bosons in a ring lattice,” New J. Phys., vol. 18, p. 075003, 2016

    2016

  10. [16]

    Observation of topological phenomena in a pro- grammable lattice of 1,800 qubits,

    A. D. King, J. Carrasquilla, J. Raymond, I. Ozfidan, E. Andriyash, A. Berkley, M. Reis, T. Lanting, R. Har- ris, F. Altomare, K. Boothby, P. I. Bunyk, C. En- derud, A. Fr´ echette, E. Hoskinson, N. Ladizinsky, T. Oh, G. Poulin-Lamarre, C. Rich, Y. Sato, A. Y. Smirnov, L. J. Sw...

    2018

  11. [17]

    Two-Dimensional Phase Tran- sition in Granular NbN Films,

    S. A. Wolf, D. U. Gubser, W. W. Fuller, J. C. Gar- land, and R. S. Newrock, “Two-Dimensional Phase Tran- sition in Granular NbN Films,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 47, p. 1071, 1981

    1981

  12. [18]

    Kosterlitz-Thouless Transition in Proximity-Coupled Superconducting Arrays,

    D. J. Resnick, J. C. Garland, J. T. Boyd, S. Shoemaker, and R. S. Newrock, “Kosterlitz-Thouless Transition in Proximity-Coupled Superconducting Arrays,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 47, p. 1542, 1981

    1981

  13. [19]

    Observable signature of the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transi- tion in a planar lattice of Bose-Einstein condensates,

    A. Trombettoni, A. Smerzi, and P. Sodano, “Observable signature of the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transi- tion in a planar lattice of Bose-Einstein condensates,” New J. Phys. , vol. 7, p. 57, 2005

    2005

  14. [20]

    Study of the Superfluid Transition in Two-Dimensional 4He Films,

    D. J. Bishop and J. D. Reppy, “Study of the Superfluid Transition in Two-Dimensional 4He Films,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 40, p. 1727, 1978

    1978

  15. [21]

    Phase order in superfluid helium films,

    S. T. Bramwell, M. F. Faulkner, P. C. W. Holdsworth, and A. Taroni, “Phase order in superfluid helium films,” EPL (Europhys. Lett.) , vol. 112, p. 56003, 2015

    2015

  16. [22]

    Effective two-dimensional thickness for the Berezinskii- Kosterlitz-Thouless-like transition in a highly under- doped La2−xSrxCuO4,

    P. G. Baity, X. Shi, Z. Shi, L. Benfatto, and D. Popovi´ c, “Effective two-dimensional thickness for the Berezinskii- Kosterlitz-Thouless-like transition in a highly under- doped La2−xSrxCuO4,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 93, p. 024519, 2016

    2016

  17. [23]

    Evidence for corre- 34 lated dynamics near the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless- like transition in highly underdoped La 2−xSrxCuO4,

    Z. Shi, X. Shi, and D. Popovi´ c, “Evidence for corre- 34 lated dynamics near the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless- like transition in highly underdoped La 2−xSrxCuO4,” Phys. Rev. B , vol. 94, p. 134503, 2016

    2016

  18. [24]

    Magnetization and universal sub-critical behaviour in two-dimensional XY magnets,

    S. T. Bramwell and P. C. W. Holdsworth, “Magnetization and universal sub-critical behaviour in two-dimensional XY magnets,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter , vol. 5, p. L53, 1993

    1993

  19. [25]

    Magnetism in the few-monolayers limit: A surface magneto-optic Kerr-effect study of the magnetic behavior of ultrathin films of Co, Ni, and Co-Ni alloys on Cu(100) and Cu(111),

    F. Huang, M. T. Kief, G. J. Mankey, and R. F. Willis, “Magnetism in the few-monolayers limit: A surface magneto-optic Kerr-effect study of the magnetic behavior of ultrathin films of Co, Ni, and Co-Ni alloys on Cu(100) and Cu(111),” Phys. Rev. B , vol. 49, p. 3962, 1994

    1994

  20. [26]

    Critical phenomena in the two-dimensional XY magnet Fe(100) on W(100),

    H. J. Elmers, J. Hauschild, G. H. Liu, and U. Gradmann, “Critical phenomena in the two-dimensional XY magnet Fe(100) on W(100),” J. Appl. Phys. , vol. 79, p. 4984, 1996

    1996

  21. [27]

    Intrinsic 2D-XY ferromagnetism in a van der Waals monolayer,

    A. Bedoya-Pinto, J.-R. Ji, A. K. Pandeya, P. Gargiani, M. Valvidares, P. Sessi, J. M. Taylor, F. Radu, K. Chang, and S. S. P. Parkin, “Intrinsic 2D-XY ferromagnetism in a van der Waals monolayer,” Science, vol. 374, p. 616, 2021

    2021

  22. [28]

    Berezinskii–Kosterlitz–Thouless crossover in a trapped atomic gas,

    Z. Hadzibabic, P. Kr¨ uger, M. Cheneau, B. Battelier, and J. Dalibard, “Berezinskii–Kosterlitz–Thouless crossover in a trapped atomic gas,” Nature, vol. 441, p. 1118, 2006

    2006

  23. [29]

    Connecting Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless and BEC Phase Transitions by Tuning Interactions in a Trapped Gas,

    R. J. Fletcher, M. Robert-de Saint-Vincent, J. Man, N. Navon, R. P. Smith, K. G. H. Viebahn, and Z. Hadz- ibabic, “Connecting Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless and BEC Phase Transitions by Tuning Interactions in a Trapped Gas,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 114, p. 255302, 2015

    2015

  24. [30]

    Observation of first and second sound in a BKT superfluid,

    P. Christodoulou, M. Ga lka, N. Dogra, R. Lopes, J. Schmitt, and Z. Hadzibabic, “Observation of first and second sound in a BKT superfluid,” Nature, vol. 594, p. 191, 2021

    2021

  25. [31]

    SU(2) orienta- tional ordering in restricted dimensions: evidence for a Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition of topological point defects in four dimensions,

    C. S. Gorham and D. E. Laughlin, “SU(2) orienta- tional ordering in restricted dimensions: evidence for a Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition of topological point defects in four dimensions,” J. Phys. Commun. , vol. 2, p. 075001, 2018

    2018

  26. [32]

    Equation of State for a Two-Dimensional Electrolyte,

    A. M. Salzberg and S. Prager, “Equation of State for a Two-Dimensional Electrolyte,” J. Chem. Phys. , vol. 38, p. 2587, 1963

    1963

  27. [33]

    Theory of one-and two-dimensional magnets with an easy magnetization plane. II. The planar, classi- cal, two-dimensional magnet,

    J. Villain, “Theory of one-and two-dimensional magnets with an easy magnetization plane. II. The planar, classi- cal, two-dimensional magnet,” J. Phys. , vol. 36, p. 581, 1975

    1975

  28. [34]

    Renormalization, vortices, and symmetry-breaking perturbations in the two-dimensional planar model,

    J. V. Jos´ e, L. P. Kadanoff, S. Kirkpatrick, and D. R. Nel- son, “Renormalization, vortices, and symmetry-breaking perturbations in the two-dimensional planar model,” Phys. Rev. B , vol. 16, p. 1217, 1977

    1977

  29. [35]

    Universal jump in the superfluid density of two-dimensional superfluids,

    D. R. Nelson and J. M. Kosterlitz, “Universal jump in the superfluid density of two-dimensional superfluids,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 39, p. 1201, 1977

    1977

  30. [36]

    Broken ergodicity,

    R. G. Palmer, “Broken ergodicity,” Adv. Phys. , vol. 31, p. 669, 1982

    1982

  31. [37]

    Absence of Ferro- magnetism or Antiferromagnetism in One- or Two- Dimensional Isotropic Heisenberg Models,

    N. D. Mermin and H. Wagner, “Absence of Ferro- magnetism or Antiferromagnetism in One- or Two- Dimensional Isotropic Heisenberg Models,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 17, p. 1133, 1966

    1966

  32. [38]

    Existence of long-range order in one and two dimensions,

    P. C. Hohenberg, “Existence of long-range order in one and two dimensions,” Phys. Rev., vol. 158, p. 383, 1967

    1967

  33. [39]

    Magnetic fluctuations in a finite two- dimensional XY model,

    P. Archambault, S. T. Bramwell, and P. C. W. Holdsworth, “Magnetic fluctuations in a finite two- dimensional XY model,” J. Phys. A , vol. 30, p. 8363, 1997

    1997

  34. [40]

    Universality of rare fluctuations in turbulence and crit- ical phenomena,

    S. T. Bramwell, P. C. W. Holdsworth, and J.-F. Pinton, “Universality of rare fluctuations in turbulence and crit- ical phenomena,” Nature, vol. 396, p. 552, 1998

    1998

  35. [41]

    Essential finite-size effect in the two- dimensional XY model,

    S. G. Chung, “Essential finite-size effect in the two- dimensional XY model,” Phys. Rev. B , vol. 60, p. 11761, 1999

    1999

  36. [42]

    Renormalization group analysis of the finite two-dimensional XY model with fourfold anisotropy: Ap- plication to the magnetic susceptibility of a ferromagnetic ultrathin film,

    D. Venus, “Renormalization group analysis of the finite two-dimensional XY model with fourfold anisotropy: Ap- plication to the magnetic susceptibility of a ferromagnetic ultrathin film,” Phys. Rev. B , vol. 105, p. 235440, 2022

    2022

  37. [43]

    Coulomb-gas representation of the two-dimensional XY model on a torus,

    A. Vallat and H. Beck, “Coulomb-gas representation of the two-dimensional XY model on a torus,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 50, p. 4015, 1994

    1994

  38. [45]

    An electric-field representation of the har- monic XY model,

    M. F. Faulkner, S. T. Bramwell, and P. C. W. Holdsworth, “An electric-field representation of the har- monic XY model,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter , vol. 29, p. 085402, 2017

    2017

  39. [47]

    The two-dimensional Coulomb gas, vor- tex unbinding, and superfluid-superconducting films,

    P. Minnhagen, “The two-dimensional Coulomb gas, vor- tex unbinding, and superfluid-superconducting films,” Rev. Mod. Phys. , vol. 59, p. 1001, 1987

    1987

  40. [48]

    Electromagnetic theory on a lattice,

    W. C. Chew, “Electromagnetic theory on a lattice,” J. Appl. Phys. , vol. 75, p. 4843, 1994

    1994

  41. [49]

    Discussion (comment on the spontaneous magnetisation of the two-dimensional Ising model),

    L. Onsager, “Discussion (comment on the spontaneous magnetisation of the two-dimensional Ising model),” Nuovo Cimento , vol. 6, p. 251, 1949

    1949

  42. [50]

    The Spontaneous Magnetization of a Two- Dimensional Ising Model,

    C. N. Yang, “The Spontaneous Magnetization of a Two- Dimensional Ising Model,” Phys. Rev. , vol. 85, p. 808, 1952

    1952

  43. [51]

    Equation of state calcu- lations by fast computing machines,

    N. Metropolis, A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller, and E. Teller, “Equation of state calcu- lations by fast computing machines,” J. Chem. Phys. , vol. 21, p. 1087, 1953

    1953

  44. [52]

    Nonuniversal critical dynamics in Monte Carlo simulations,

    R. H. Swendsen and J.-S. Wang, “Nonuniversal critical dynamics in Monte Carlo simulations,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 58, p. 86, 1987

    1987

  45. [53]

    Sampling algorithms in statistical physics: a guide for statistics and machine learning,

    M. F. Faulkner and S. Livingstone, “Sampling algorithms in statistical physics: a guide for statistics and machine learning,” Statist. Sci. , vol. 39, p. 137, 2024

    2024

  46. [54]

    Chaos and the semiclassical limit of quantum mechanics (is the moon there when somebody looks?),

    M. V. Berry, “Chaos and the semiclassical limit of quantum mechanics (is the moon there when somebody looks?),” in Quantum Mechanics: Scientific perspectives on divine action (R. J. Rusell, P. Clayton, K. Wegter- McNelly, and J. Polkinghorne, eds.), p. 41, Vatican Ob- servator...

    2001

  47. [55]

    Monte Carlo study of the planar spin model,

    J. Tobochnik and G. V. Chester, “Monte Carlo study of the planar spin model,” Phys. Rev. B , vol. 20, p. 3761, 1979

    1979

  48. [56]

    Magne- tization: A characteristic of the Kosterlitz-Thouless- Berezinskii transition,

    S. T. Bramwell and P. C. W. Holdsworth, “Magne- tization: A characteristic of the Kosterlitz-Thouless- Berezinskii transition,” Phys. Rev. B , vol. 49, p. 8811, 1994

    1994

  49. [57]

    Event-chain Monte Carlo for classical continuous spin models,

    M. Michel, J. Mayer, and W. Krauth, “Event-chain Monte Carlo for classical continuous spin models,” EPL (Europhys. Lett.), vol. 112, p. 20003, 2015

    2015

  50. [58]

    Weak con- vergence and optimal scaling of random walk Metropolis algorithms,

    G. O. Roberts, A. Gelman, and W. R. Gilks, “Weak con- vergence and optimal scaling of random walk Metropolis algorithms,” Ann. Appl. Probab., vol. 7, p. 110, 1997

    1997

  51. [59]

    Optimal scaling for par- 35 tially updating MCMC algorithms,

    P. Neal and G. Roberts, “Optimal scaling for par- 35 tially updating MCMC algorithms,” Ann. Appl. Probab., vol. 16, p. 475, 2006

    2006

  52. [60]

    Metropolis Monte Carlo method as a numerical technique to solve the Fokker—Planck equation,

    K. Kikuchi, M. Yoshida, T. Maekawa, and H. Watan- abe, “Metropolis Monte Carlo method as a numerical technique to solve the Fokker—Planck equation,” Chem. Phys. Lett., vol. 185, p. 335, 1991

    1991

  53. [61]

    Dynamic Monte Carlo ver- sus Brownian dynamics: A comparison for self-diffusion and crystallization in colloidal fluids,

    E. Sanz and D. Marenduzzo, “Dynamic Monte Carlo ver- sus Brownian dynamics: A comparison for self-diffusion and crystallization in colloidal fluids,” J. Chem. Phys. , vol. 132, p. 194102, 2010

    2010

  54. [62]

    Methods and applications of PDMP samplers with boundary conditions,

    J. Bierkens, S. Grazzi, G. O. Roberts, and M. Schauer, “Methods and applications of PDMP samplers with boundary conditions,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08023 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  55. [63]

    A general perspective on the Metropolis–Hastings kernel,

    C. Andrieu, A. Lee, and S. Livingstone, “A general perspective on the Metropolis–Hastings kernel,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.14881, 2020

    2012 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Peskun–Tierney order- ing for Markovian Monte Carlo: Beyond the reversible scenario,

    C. Andrieu and S. Livingstone, “Peskun–Tierney order- ing for Markovian Monte Carlo: Beyond the reversible scenario,” Ann. Statist., vol. 49, p. 1958, 2021

    1958

  57. [65]

    PDMP Characterisation of Event-Chain Monte Carlo Algo- rithms for Particle Systems,

    A. Monemvassitis, A. Guillin, and M. Michel, “PDMP Characterisation of Event-Chain Monte Carlo Algo- rithms for Particle Systems,” J. Stat. Phys. , vol. 190, p. 66, 2023

    2023

  58. [66]

    Ergodicity of the zigzag process,

    J. Bierkens, G. O. Roberts, and P.-A. Zitt, “Ergodicity of the zigzag process,” Ann. Appl. Probab., vol. 29, p. 2266, 2019

    2019

  59. [67]

    Event- chain Monte Carlo algorithms for hard-sphere systems,

    E. P. Bernard, W. Krauth, and D. B. Wilson, “Event- chain Monte Carlo algorithms for hard-sphere systems,” Phys. Rev. E , vol. 80, p. 056704, 2009

    2009

  60. [68]

    All-atom computations with irreversible Markov chains,

    M. F. Faulkner, L. Qin, A. C. Maggs, and W. Krauth, “All-atom computations with irreversible Markov chains,” J. Chem. Phys. , vol. 149, p. 064113, 2018

    2018

  61. [69]

    Monte Carlo determina- tion of the critical temperature for the two-dimensional XY model,

    H. Weber and P. Minnhagen, “Monte Carlo determina- tion of the critical temperature for the two-dimensional XY model,” Phys. Rev. B , vol. 37, p. 5986(R), 1988

    1988

  62. [70]

    On the composition of elementary errors,

    H. Cram´ er, “On the composition of elementary errors,” Scand. Actuar. J. , vol. 1928, p. 13, 1928

    1928

  63. [71]

    von Mises, Wahrscheinlichkeit Statistik und Wahrheit

    R. von Mises, Wahrscheinlichkeit Statistik und Wahrheit . Springer Vienna, 1952

    1952

  64. [72]

    Classical frustrated XY model: Continuity of the ground-state energy as a function of the frustration,

    A. Vallat and H. Beck, “Classical frustrated XY model: Continuity of the ground-state energy as a function of the frustration,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 68, p. 3096, 1992

    1992

  65. [73]

    Local Simulation Al- gorithms for Coulomb Interactions,

    A. C. Maggs and V. Rossetto, “Local Simulation Al- gorithms for Coulomb Interactions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 88, p. 196402, 2002

    2002

  66. [74]

    Rossetto, M´ ecanique statistique de syst` emes sous constraintes : topologie de l’ADN et simulations ´ electrostatiques

    V. Rossetto, M´ ecanique statistique de syst` emes sous constraintes : topologie de l’ADN et simulations ´ electrostatiques. Deuxi` eme partie : Simulations locales d’interactions coulombiennes . PhD thesis, l’universit´ e Pierre-et-Marie-Curie, 2002

    2002

  67. [75]

    Part I. The 2D Classical Coulomb Gas near the Zero-Density Kosterlitz–Thouless Critical Point: Correlations and Critical Line,

    A. Alastuey and F. Cornu, “Part I. The 2D Classical Coulomb Gas near the Zero-Density Kosterlitz–Thouless Critical Point: Correlations and Critical Line,” J. Stat. Phys., vol. 89, p. 6, 1997

    1997

  68. [76]

    Direct evidence of the dis- continuous character of the Kosterlitz-Thouless jump,

    P. Minnhagen and B. J. Kim, “Direct evidence of the dis- continuous character of the Kosterlitz-Thouless jump,” Phys. Rev. B , vol. 67, p. 172509, 2003

    2003

  69. [77]

    Weak ergodicity breaking in optical sensing,

    V. G. Ramesh and S. R. K. Rodriguez, “Weak ergodicity breaking in optical sensing,” Phys. Rev. Research, vol. 6, p. 033245, 2024

    2024

  70. [78]

    Collective Monte Carlo updating for spin sys- tems,

    U. Wolff, “Collective Monte Carlo updating for spin sys- tems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 62, p. 361, 1989

    1989

  71. [79]

    Irreversible Markov chains in spin models: Topological excitations,

    Z. Lei and W. Krauth, “Irreversible Markov chains in spin models: Topological excitations,” EPL (Europhys. Lett.), vol. 121, p. 10008, 2018

    2018

  72. [80]

    Anomalous diffusion analy- sis of the lifting events in the event-chain Monte Carlo for the classical XY models,

    K. Kimura and S. Higuchi, “Anomalous diffusion analy- sis of the lifting events in the event-chain Monte Carlo for the classical XY models,” EPL (Europhys. Lett.) , vol. 120, p. 30003, 2017

    2017

  73. [81]

    A piecewise determin- istic scaling limit of lifted Metropolis–Hastings in the Curie–Weiss model,

    J. Bierkens and G. O. Roberts, “A piecewise determin- istic scaling limit of lifted Metropolis–Hastings in the Curie–Weiss model,” Ann. Appl. Probab., vol. 27, p. 846, 2017

    2017

  74. [82]

    Event-chain Monte Carlo with factor fields,

    Z. Lei, W. Krauth, and A. C. Maggs, “Event-chain Monte Carlo with factor fields,” Phys. Rev. E, vol. 99, p. 043301, 2019

    2019

  75. [83]

    Hamiltonian Monte Carlo vs. event-chain Monte Carlo: an appraisal of sampling strategies beyond the diffusive regime,

    W. Krauth, “Hamiltonian Monte Carlo vs. event-chain Monte Carlo: an appraisal of sampling strategies beyond the diffusive regime,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.11690 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  76. [84]

    super-aLby software package

    M. F. Faulkner and S. Livingstone, “super-aLby software package.” https://github.com/michaelfaulkner/super- aLby, 2024

    2024

  77. [85]

    xy-type-models software package

    M. F. Faulkner, “xy-type-models software package.” https://github.com/michaelfaulkner/xy-type-models, 2024

    2024

  78. [86]

    Emergent electrostatics in planar XY spin models: the bridge connecting topological order with broken U (1) symmetry (data deposit)

    M. F. Faulkner, “Emergent electrostatics in planar XY spin models: the bridge connecting topological order with broken U (1) symmetry (data deposit).” https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.v15dv427n, 2025

    2025 doi

  79. [87]

    General symmetry breaking at a topological phase transition (data deposit)

    M. F. Faulkner, “General symmetry breaking at a topological phase transition (data deposit).” https://doi.org/10.5523/bris.3ov1rl6xtshwv2iuixrbs6f39q, 2023

    2023 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.