Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 94 references

Virtual Realities: Is there only one advanced image display that astronomers need?

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that VR/MR head-mounted displays have reached the technical maturity to replicate or replace the functionality of most other advanced image displays in astronomy, and its survey evidence points to VR/MR as the one…

desk verdict A transparent, useful scoping survey whose new 2021 data point is real, but whose abstract overstates what 17 self-selected respondents can support about the whole ASA membership. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.12383 v1 pith:4I35ZKE6 submitted 2024-12-16 astro-ph.IM

Christopher J. Fluke , Hugo K. Walsh , Lewis de Zoete Grundy , Brian Brady This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.IM
keywords advancedimagedisplaysvirtualrealityhead-mountedastronomydatavisualisationAIDAsurveytileddisplaywallsdigitaldomesCAVEimmersiveenvironments
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that astronomers still do almost all of their data visualisation on standard displays, that virtual reality and mixed reality head-mounted displays (VR/MR HMDs) are the only advanced display category whose awareness is growing, and that these headsets have now matured enough to stand in for stereoscopic screens, tiled display walls, digital domes, and CAVE-style immersive rooms. The stakes are practical: if true, departments and facilities can avoid investing in expensive, room-fixed display infrastructure and concentrate on one portable, comparatively cheap device. The evidence is a 2021 survey of ASA members that drew 17 complete responses, from which the authors compute 90% confidence intervals and infer high standard-display use, low advanced-display use, moderate hands-on familiarity with VR/MR headsets, and a request for better software and knowledge rather than for more hardware.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the VR/MR head-mounted display treated as a multi-purpose advanced display: an HMD is a display, not just a peripheral, because it supplies the left-eye/right-eye image pair of a stereoscopic display, the immersive all-sky field of a dome, the high-pixel navigable canvas of a tiled wall, and the head-tracked enclosure of a CAVE, all within a headset. The paper's measuring instrument is the AIDA 2021 survey, a ten-question instrument whose responses are turned into population-proportion confidence intervals with a finite-population correction for a sample of 17 drawn from roughly 750 ASA members, which is what lets the authors convert counts into claims about the wider membership.

What would settle it

Run the same ten-question instrument on a randomized sample of several hundred ASA members: if the response pattern shows VR/MR awareness no higher than other advanced display categories, or self-reported research use of advanced displays above a few percent, the paper's three inferences would be contradicted. A smaller observational check: if teams that adopt HMDs for collaborative analysis report that the single-user headset fails the shared-viewing tasks that walls and domes handle, the claim that VR/MR can replicate or replace most other advanced displays is only partly true.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that a single class of device, the VR/MR head-mounted display, can now perform the jobs of the four most significant advanced displays: it is inherently stereoscopic because it feeds separate images to the two eyes; it offers a 4π-steradian field of view, covering the all-sky role of a digital dome without a physical surface or projectors; it can host a virtual tiled display wall that the user walks around and zooms into; and it delivers the head-tracked, immersive experience that CAVE and CAVE2 rooms were built to provide, at consumer prices and without a dedicated facility. The 2021 AIDA survey responses are used to argue that awareness of VR/MR headsets has risen since the 2005 survey while usage of every other advanced display category remains essentially flat, and that the binding constraints have shifted from hardware cost and access to missing software and missing knowledge.

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on 17 self-selected respondents, recruited through two email blasts during a pandemic, standing in for the roughly 750 members of the surveyed society and, by the authors' extension, for astronomers worldwide; if the astronomers who ignored the survey differ from those who answered, every usage and awareness rate in the conclusions is an overestimate.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is right, institutions can treat a small stock of VR/MR headsets as a substitute for maintaining or building tiled display walls, digital domes, stereoscopic projection setups, and CAVE rooms.
  • The main remaining barrier is software: survey respondents name missing applications and missing knowledge as the top obstacles, so the payoff for the community is a Python-compatible layer that connects astronomers' standard workflows to VR environments.
  • Awareness campaigns matter more than hardware subsidies: improved knowledge was the intervention respondents most often selected as likely to change their use.
  • Because 88% of respondents work in Unix/Linux or macOS environments, VR software that is tied to a single vendor's operating system will stall adoption; multiplatform toolchains are the direct corollary.
  • The result implies the international astronomy community, assumed to resemble the ASA on the authors' reasoning, is closer to a single-display future than expenditure on room-scale facilities would suggest.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The 90% confidence intervals rest on 17 self-selected respondents, and the authors concede the likely participation bias is an existing interest in advanced displays; if uninterested astronomers stayed silent, the true usage and awareness rates are lower than stated, so the VR awareness advantage is the least secure of the three headline inferences.
  • The replacement claim is strongest for single-user exploration and weakest for the collaborative and audience-facing roles of domes and large walls, since an HMD isolates one viewer; a dome or wall remains better for a room of people or a public show.
  • A testable extension would repeat the survey with a larger, randomized sample of the same membership: the paper's prediction is that VR/MR awareness and non-research use will again outrank all other advanced display categories while research use stays near zero.
  • If headset resolution keeps improving toward 8K-class per-eye panels, the pixel-count objection to replacing tiled walls weakens further, so the paper's practical conclusion becomes more likely over time rather than less.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports the results of the second Advanced Image Displays for Astronomy (AIDA) survey, advertised to members of the Astronomical Society of Australia in 2021. Only 17 complete responses were obtained (~2.3% of the ~750 membership), and the authors compute 90% population-proportion confidence intervals (Table 14, Eq. A.3) to infer usage and awareness levels for the ASA membership. They find that most respondents use standard displays and few use advanced displays, that VR/MR head-mounted displays are the most familiar advanced display category, and that lack of knowledge and suitable software are the main barriers. Building on these results and on a review of recent VR applications in astronomy, the authors argue that VR/MR HMDs have reached sufficient maturity to replicate or replace most other advanced display categories.

Significance. If the survey inferences were valid, the paper would provide a useful snapshot of display adoption in a national astronomical community and would strengthen the case for prioritizing VR/MR investment. The paper's strength lies in its transparent presentation of raw response data, its explicit acknowledgment of the small sample, and its detailed technical argument that VR/MR HMDs can functionally emulate stereoscopic displays, digital domes, tiled display walls, and CAVE/CAVE2 environments, supported by a substantial review of recent VR applications in astronomy. However, the central statistical claim that these 17 self-selected responses support inferences about the ASA membership (or, by extension, international astronomers) is not presently justified, and the paper's own admitted participation bias undermines the abstract's 'we infer' statements.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 4.1, Eq. A.3, Table 14] The population-proportion confidence intervals are computed under sampling assumptions that do not hold for this survey. Equation A.3 applies the finite-population correction and normal approximation as if the 17 respondents were a probability sample from the ASA frame; in fact, participation was via two self-selected email responses during a pandemic, and Section 4.1 states that 'the most likely participation bias is an underlying interest in the use of advanced image displays.' When the outcome (interest/awareness) is correlated with the missingness indicator, the data are missing not at random, and the CIs in Table 14 are not valid population estimates. The direction of bias is known: for awareness and usage questions, the estimates are inflated. For example, Q5 shows 13/17 respondents had seen a VR/MR HMD (CI 59-93%), but if most of the 733 nonrespondents had not seen one, the population proportion could be as low as 13/750 ≈ 1.7%. The abstract's claims (1), (2), and (3) all rest on this unvalidated inductive step. I request either a sensitivity analysis under extreme-case nonresponse assumptions, or a reframing of all conclusions as descriptive of the respondent cohort only.
  2. [Abstract and Sec. 5] The abstract states 'From 17 complete survey responses... we infer that: (1) a high proportion of ASA members use standard displays but do not use advanced displays; (2) a moderate proportion have seen a VR/MR HMD...' and the Conclusions repeat these as 90% confidence statements. This is in tension with the paper's own earlier caveats in Section 3.4 ('17 responses is insufficient to draw strong conclusions') and Section 5 ('does not allow us to draw far-reaching conclusions'). The self-acknowledged limitation should be reflected in the abstract and conclusions; as written, the summary overstates the inferential strength. At minimum, the abstract should be revised to say that the results describe the respondents and are indicative only, or the authors should provide a defensible statistical justification for the population inference.
  3. [Sec. 3.2, Fig. 2] The response-rate description (Section 3.2) reports that two email blasts elicited only 20 responses, 17 of which are analyzed. The paper attributes the low response to 'survey fatigue' during COVID-19, citing external literature, but this does not address the more fundamental threat of non-ignorable nonresponse. The external-response citations are about response rates generally, not about the specific self-selection mechanism here. I recommend the authors explicitly discuss why nonresponse is ignorable with respect to the key outcomes, or present a bound analysis showing the conclusions are robust to plausible nonresponse scenarios. Without this, the 90% CIs in Table 14 should not be presented as if they capture the population uncertainty.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 4.1] The text states that the upper confidence level for Q1 is 'clipped at 100, with a value of 103.4 calculated.' This is reasonable, but it would be clearer to report the unclipped value in the table note rather than only in the text, since Table 14 displays 100.0.
  2. [Sec. 4.5 and Table 16] Table 16 reports responses from 82 participants, not the 17 AIDA 2021 respondents. It should be explicitly stated, both in the main text and in the table caption, that this question came from the larger survey described in Walsh et al. (submitted) and not from the AIDA 2021 subset. Currently, a reader could wrongly assume these are the same respondents.
  3. [Sec. 4.2, Table 15] The comparison with AIDA 2005 uses different cohort definitions and different sample sizes (41 vs. 17). The paper acknowledges this partly, but Table 15 would benefit from showing the raw N values for each cell so the percentages are not over-interpreted.
  4. [Sec. 3.3, Table 5] The sentence 'As none of the respondents selected smartphone, advanced display or used the free text option' is slightly ambiguous: Table 7 shows 15/17 use a smartphone for non-research purposes, so 'smartphone' in Q3 may mean as a work display component. Please clarify the Q3 options.
  5. [General] There are occasional typographical issues (e.g., 'occured' in Sec. 3.4, 'and' in 'Visualisation of the local Milky Way projected onto the dome' in the Figure 1 caption). A careful copyedit is recommended.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: survey summaries, standard confidence intervals, and qualitative VR capability arguments stand on their own evidence.

full rationale

The paper's claims are empirical survey summaries and qualitative technical comparisons, not derived predictions. The population-proportion confidence intervals in Table 14 are computed directly from the response counts via the standard finite-population formula in Eqs. A.1-A.3, so the conclusions restate the sample proportions with stated sampling uncertainty; this is statistical inference, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. No equation in the paper predicts an outcome from a parameter that was itself defined in terms of that outcome. The VR/MR-as-multi-purpose-display argument in Section 4.3 is based on the device characteristics enumerated in Table 2, not on a derivation from the survey data. The self-citations to Fluke et al. (2006) as the prior AIDA survey, Fluke and Barnes (2018) for all-sky VR visualization, and Fluke et al. (2023) for the Swinburne display wall serve as comparators or supporting technical context; they are not used as an unverified uniqueness theorem or as the sole justification for a load-bearing conclusion. The acknowledged participation-bias concern and the small sample size are validity limitations, not circularity, because the survey data are independent of the paper's interpretive claims. No circular step can be exhibited by the paper's own equations or construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The key unproved premise is that 17 self-selected respondents stand in for the ASA membership and, further, for international astronomers. The confidence-interval calculation additionally assumes the normal approximation is valid at n=17 for proportions near 0 and 1. The VR/MR replacement argument rests on a technical-maturity assumption rather than on measured user performance.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Self-selected AIDA 2021 respondents are representative of the ASA membership for display awareness and usage.
    Invoked when converting 17 responses into population proportion confidence intervals for ~750 ASA members in Section 4.1, Table 14, and Equation A.3. The paper itself notes the likely participation bias in Section 3.2.
  • standard math A normal approximation to the binomial sampling distribution is valid with Nsample=17, including proportions at or near 1.
    Equation A.3 uses a normal critical value with finite population correction. For Q1 with Psp=94%, the upper limit exceeds 100% and is clipped, which indicates the approximation is strained.
  • domain assumption The Australian ASA experience is compatible with the broader international astronomy community.
    The abstract and Section 4 say the results should generalize worldwide; no comparative international data are provided.
  • domain assumption Consumer VR/MR HMDs can functionally replace stereoscopic displays, digital domes, tiled display walls, and CAVE/CAVE2 for astronomy tasks.
    Section 4.3 asserts this from hardware features and literature examples; no task-level evaluation is provided, and the survey shows essentially no research use of VR.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Virtual Realities: Is there only one advanced image display that astronomers need?." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4I35ZKE6

@misc{pith2026241212383,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Virtual Realities: Is there only one advanced image display that astronomers need?},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4I35ZKE6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.12383}
}
read the original abstract

Data visualisation is an essential ingredient of scientific analysis, discovery, and communication. Along with a human (to do the looking) and the data (something to look at), an image display device is a key component of any data visualisation workflow. For the purpose of this work, standard displays include combinations of laptop displays, peripheral monitors, tablet and smartphone screens, while the main categories of advanced displays are stereoscopic displays, tiled display walls, digital domes, virtual/mixed reality (VR/MR) head-mounted displays, and CAVE/CAVE2-style immersive rooms. We present the results of the second Advanced Image Displays for Astronomy (AIDA) survey, advertised to the membership of the Astronomical Society of Australia (ASA) during June-August 2021. The goal of this survey was to gather background information on the level of awareness and usage of advanced displays in astronomy and astrophysics research. From 17 complete survey responses, sampled from a population of ~750 ASA members, we infer that: (1) a high proportion of ASA members use standard displays but do not use advanced displays; (2) a moderate proportion have seen a VR/MR HMD, and may also have used one -- but not for research activities; and (3) there is a need for improved knowledge in general about advanced displays, along with relevant software or applications that can target specific science needs. We expect that this is compatible with the experiences of much of the international astronomy and astrophysics research community. We suggest that VR/MR head-mounted displays have now reached a level of technical maturity such that they could be used to replicate or replace the functionality of most other advanced displays.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.12383 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Examples of the four advanced image displays that continue to be the front runners for wider-scale adoption in astronomy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. A stacked bar chart showing the number of responses to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Change in awareness of four advanced displays. For each [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in ":" * " " * FUNCTION f...

  2. [2]

    , author Cabot , F

    author Alesina , F. , author Cabot , F. , author Buchschacher , N. , author Burnier , J. , year 2019 . title Exoplanets Data Visualization in Multi-dimensional Plots using Virtual Reality in DACE , in: editor Teuben , P.J. , editor Pound , M.W. , editor Thomas , B.A. , editor Warner , E.M. (Eds.), booktitle Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems ...

    2019

  3. [3]

    , author Kallio , E

    author Alho , M. , author Kallio , E. , author J \"a rvinen , R. , year 2019 . title Virtual Planetarium - Space Physics in Virtual Reality , in: booktitle EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts , p. pages 12701

    2019

  4. [4]

    , author Jiang , E

    author Arcand , K.K. , author Jiang , E. , author Price , S. , author Watzke , M. , author Sgouros , T. , author Edmonds , P. , year 2018 . title Walking Through an Exploded Star: Rendering Supernova Remnant Cassiopeia A into Virtual Reality . journal Communicating Astronomy with the Public Journal volume 24 , pages 17

    2018

  5. [5]

    , author Tollerud , E.J

    author Astropy Collaboration , author Robitaille , T.P. , author Tollerud , E.J. , author Greenfield , P. , author Droettboom , M. , author Bray , E. , author Aldcroft , T. , author Davis , M. , author Ginsburg , A. , author Price-Whelan , A.M. , author Kerzendorf , W.E. , author Conley , A. , author Crighton , N. , author Barbary , K. , author Muna , D. ...

    2013

  6. [6]

    , author Brunner , R.J

    author Ball , N.M. , author Brunner , R.J. , year 2010 . title Data Mining and Machine Learning in Astronomy . journal International Journal of Modern Physics D volume 19 , pages 1049--1106

    2010

  7. [7]

    , author Vogt , F.P.A

    author Baracaglia , E. , author Vogt , F.P.A. , year 2020 . title E0102-VR: Exploring the scientific potential of Virtual Reality for observational astrophysics . journal Astronomy and Computing volume 30 , pages 100352

    2020

  8. [8]

    , author Fluke , C.J

    author Barnes , D.G. , author Fluke , C.J. , author Bourke , P.D. , author Parry , O.T. , year 2006 . title An Advanced, Three-Dimensional Plotting Library for Astronomy . journal PASA volume 23 , pages 82--93

    2006

Show all 94 references
  1. [9]

    , year 2019

    author Baron , D. , year 2019 . title Machine Learning in Astronomy: a practical overview . journal arXiv e-prints arXiv:1904.07248 http://arxiv.org/abs/1904.07248

    2019 arXiv

  2. [10]

    , author Arnouts , S

    author Bertin , E. , author Arnouts , S. , year 1996 . title SExtractor: Software for source extraction. journal Astronomy & Astrophysics Supplement volume 117 , pages 393--404

    1996

  3. [11]

    , author Orlando , S

    author Bocchino , F. , author Orlando , S. , author Pillitteri , I. , author Miceli , M. , author Peres , G. , year 2019 . title A Virtual Reality Environment for Scientific Exploitation of 3D MHD Astrophysical Simulations , in: booktitle Supernova Remnants: An Odyssey in Spac...

    2019

  4. [12]

    , author Djorgovski, S.G

    author Brunner, R.J. , author Djorgovski, S.G. , author Prince, T.A. , author Szalay, A.S. , year 2002 . title Massive datasets in astronomy , in: editor Abello, J. , editor Pardalos, P.M. , editor Resende, M.G.C. (Eds.), booktitle Handbook of Massive Data Sets , publisher Spr...

    2002

  5. [13]

    , year 1996

    author Bryson, S. , year 1996 . title Virtual reality in scientific visualization . journal Commun. ACM volume 39 , pages 62–71

    1996

  6. [14]

    , author Le Mou \'e lic , S

    author Caravaca , G. , author Le Mou \'e lic , S. , author Mangold , N. , author L'Haridon , J. , author Le Deit , L. , author Mass \'e , M. , year 2020 . title 3D digital outcrop model reconstruction of the Kimberley outcrop (Gale crater, Mars) and its integration into Virtua...

    2020

  7. [15]

    , author Termoz-Masson, J

    author Castet, E. , author Termoz-Masson, J. , author Vizcay, S. , author Delachambre, J. , author Myrodia, V. , author Aguilar, C. , author Matonti, F. , author Kornprobst, P. , year 2024 . title PTVR – A software in Python to make virtual reality experiments easier to build ...

    2024

  8. [16]

    , author Sirianni , M

    author Clampin , M. , author Sirianni , M. , author Hartig , G.F. , author Ford , H.C. , author Illingworth , G.D. , author Burmester , B. , author Koldewynd , W. , author Martel , A.R. , author Riess , A. , author Schrein , R.J. , author Sullivan , P.C. , year 2002 . title In...

    2002

  9. [17]

    , author D \' az-Merced , W

    author Cooke , J. , author D \' az-Merced , W. , author Foran , G. , author Hannam , J. , author Garcia , B. , year 2019 . title Exploring Data Sonification to Enable, Enhance, and Accelerate the Analysis of Big, Noisy, and Multi-Dimensional Data , in: editor Griffin , R.E. (E...

    2019

  10. [18]

    , author Sandin, D.J

    author Cruz-Neira, C. , author Sandin, D.J. , author DeFanti, T.A. , author Kenyon, R.V. , author Hart, J.C. , year 1992 . title The cave: Audio visual experience automatic virtual environment . journal Commun. ACM volume 35 , pages 64–72

    1992

  11. [19]

    , author Bronzwaer , T

    author Davelaar , J. , author Bronzwaer , T. , author Kok , D. , author Younsi , Z. , author Mo \'s cibrodzka , M. , author Falcke , H. , year 2018 . title Observing supermassive black holes in virtual reality . journal Computational Astrophysics and Cosmology volume 5 , pages 1

    2018

  12. [20]

    , author Egiz , A

    author de Koning , R. , author Egiz , A. , author Kotecha , J. , author Ciuculete , A.C. , author Ooi , S.Z.Y. , author Bankole , N.D.A. , author Erhabor , J. , author Higginbotham , G. , author Khan , M. , author Dalle , D.U. , author Sichimba , D. , author Bandyopadhyay , S....

    2021

  13. [21]

    , year 1992

    author Deering, M. , year 1992 . title High resolution virtual reality . journal SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph. volume 26 , pages 195–202

    1992

  14. [22]

    , author Palleske , R

    author Deg , N. , author Palleske , R. , author Spekkens , K. , author Wang , J. , author Jarrett , T. , author English , J. , author Lin , X. , author Yeung , J. , author Mould , J.R. , author Catinella , B. , author D \'e nes , H. , author Elagali , A. , author For , B.Q. , ...

    2023

  15. [23]

    , author Mahabal , A.A

    author Djorgovski , S.G. , author Mahabal , A.A. , author Graham , M.J. , author Polsterer , K. , author Krone-Martins , A. , year 2022 . title Applications of AI in Astronomy . journal arXiv e-prints arXiv:2212.01493 http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.01493

    2022 arXiv

  16. [24]

    , author Djorgovski, S.G

    author Donalek, C. , author Djorgovski, S.G. , author Cioc, A. , author Wang, A. , author Zhang, J. , author Lawler, E. , author Yeh, S. , author Mahabal, A. , author Graham, M. , author Drake, A. , author Davidoff, S. , author Norris, J.S. , author Longo, G. , year 2014 . tit...

    2014

  17. [25]

    , author Adeli , S

    author Elgner , S. , author Adeli , S. , author Gwinner , K. , author Preusker , F. , author Kersten , E. , author Matz , K.D. , author Roatsch , T. , author Jaumann , R. , author Oberst , J. , year 2017 . title Visualizing planetary data by using 3D engines , in: booktitle Eu...

    2017

  18. [26]

    , author Nishimoto , A

    author Febretti , A. , author Nishimoto , A. , author Thigpen , T. , author Talandis , J. , author Long , L. , author Pirtle , J.D. , author Peterka , T. , author Verlo , A. , author Brown , M. , author Plepys , D. , author Sandin , D. , author Renambot , L. , author Johnson ,...

    2013

  19. [27]

    , author English , J

    author Ferrand , G. , author English , J. , author Irani , P. , year 2016 . title 3D visualization of astronomy data cubes using immersive displays . journal arXiv e-prints arXiv:1607.08874 http://arxiv.org/abs/1607.08874

    2016 arXiv

  20. [28]

    , author Warren , D

    author Ferrand , G. , author Warren , D. , year 2018 . title Engaging the Public with Supernova and Supernova Remnant Research Using Virtual Reality . journal Communicating Astronomy with the Public Journal volume 24 , pages 25

    2018

  21. [29]

    , year 2006

    author Flaugher , B. , year 2006 . title The Dark Energy Survey instrument design , in: editor McLean , I.S. , editor Iye , M. (Eds.), booktitle Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series , p. pages 62692C

    2006

  22. [30]

    , author Barnes , D.G

    author Fluke , C.J. , author Barnes , D.G. , year 2018 . title Immersive Virtual Reality Experiences for All-Sky Data . journal PASA volume 35 , pages e026

    2018

  23. [31]

    , author Bourke , P.D

    author Fluke , C.J. , author Bourke , P.D. , author O'Donovan , D. , year 2006 . title Future Directions in Astronomy Visualization . journal PASA volume 23 , pages 12--24

    2006

  24. [32]

    , author Jacobs , C

    author Fluke , C.J. , author Jacobs , C. , year 2020 . title Surveying the reach and maturity of machine learning and artificial intelligence in astronomy . journal WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery volume 10 , pages e1349

    2020

  25. [33]

    , author Vohl , D

    author Fluke , C.J. , author Vohl , D. , author Kilborn , V.A. , author Murugeshan , C. , year 2023 . title Survey-scale discovery-based research processes: Evaluating a bespoke visualisation environment for astronomical survey data . journal PASA volume 40 , pages e035

    2023

  26. [34]

    , year 1982

    author Fomalont , E. , year 1982 . title Image Display and Analysis , in: booktitle Synthesis Mapping , p. pages 11

    1982

  27. [35]

    , author Albrow , L

    author Glowacki , M. , author Albrow , L. , author Reynolds , T. , author Elson , E. , author Mahony , E.K. , author Allison , J.R. , year 2024 . title A serendipitous discovery of H I-rich galaxy groups with MeerKAT . journal MNRAS volume 529 , pages 3469--3483

    2024

  28. [36]

    , author Fluke , C.J

    author Hassan , A. , author Fluke , C.J. , year 2011 . title Scientific Visualization in Astronomy: Towards the Petascale Astronomy Era . journal PASA volume 28 , pages 150--170

    2011

  29. [37]

    , author Kuchner , M.J

    author Higashio , S. , author Kuchner , M.J. , author Silverberg , S.M. , author Brandt , M.A. , author Grubb , T.G. , author Gagn \'e , J. , author Debes , J.H. , author Schlieder , J. , author Wisniewski , J.P. , author Slocum , S. , author Bans , A.S. , author Bhattacharjee...

    2022

  30. [38]

    , author Dodgson, N.A

    author Holliman, N.S. , author Dodgson, N.A. , author Favalora, G.E. , author Pockett, L. , year 2011 . title Three-dimensional displays: A review and applications analysis . journal IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting volume 57 , pages 362--371

    2011

  31. [39]

    , author Danehy , A

    author Impey , C. , author Danehy , A. , year 2022 . title Exploring the Frontiers of Space in 3D: Immersive Virtual Reality for Astronomy Outreach . journal Communicating Astronomy with the Public Journal volume 31 , pages 28

    2022

  32. [40]

    , author Comrie , A

    author Jarrett , T.H. , author Comrie , A. , author Marchetti , L. , author Sivitilli , A. , author Macfarlane , S. , author Vitello , F. , author Becciani , U. , author Taylor , A.R. , author van der Hulst , J.M. , author Serra , P. , author Katz , N. , author Cluver , M.E. ,...

    2021

  33. [41]

    , author MeerKAT Team , year 2016

    author Jonas , J. , author MeerKAT Team , year 2016 . title The MeerKAT Radio Telescope , in: booktitle MeerKAT Science: On the Pathway to the SKA , p. pages 1

    2016

  34. [42]

    , author Moresi , L

    author Kaluza , O. , author Moresi , L. , author Mansour , J. , author Barnes , D.G. , year 2019 . title OKaluza/LavaVu: v1.4.3

    2019

  35. [43]

    , author Bondell, J

    author Kersting, M. , author Bondell, J. , author Steir, R. , author Myers, M. , year 2024 . title Virtual reality in astronomy education: reflecting on design principles through a dialogue between researchers and practitioners . journal International Journal of Science Educat...

    2024

  36. [44]

    , author Serra , P

    author Kleiner , D. , author Serra , P. , author Maccagni , F.M. , author Venhola , A. , author Morokuma-Matsui , K. , author Peletier , R. , author Iodice , E. , author Raj , M.A. , author de Blok , W.J.G. , author Comrie , A. , author J \'o zsa , G.I.G. , author Kamphuis , P...

    2021

  37. [45]

    , author LeBlanc , M

    author Krieger , N. , author LeBlanc , M. , author Waterman , P. , author Reisner , S. , author Testa , C. , author Chen , J. , year 2023 . title Decreasing Survey Response Rates in the Time of COVID-19: Implications for Analyses of Population Health and Health Inequities . jo...

    2023

  38. [46]

    , author Higashio , S

    author Kuchner , M.J. , author Higashio , S. , author Brandt , M.A. , year 2020 . title Disks-Hosting Members of Columba-Carina Found Using Disk Detective and Virtual Reality , in: booktitle American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts , p. pages 357.04

    2020

  39. [47]

    , author Kraan-Korteweg , R.C

    author Lambert , T.S. , author Kraan-Korteweg , R.C. , author Jarrett , T.H. , author Macri , L.M. , year 2020 . title The 2MASS redshift survey galaxy group catalogue derived from a graph-theory based friends-of-friends algorithm . journal MNRAS volume 497 , pages 2954--2973

    2020

  40. [48]

    , author Young, M

    author Lan, F. , author Young, M. , author Anderson, L. , author Ynnerman, A. , author Bock, A. , author Borkin, M.A. , author Forbes, A.G. , author Kollmeier, J.A. , author Wang, B. , year 2021 . title Visualization in astrophysics: Developing new methods, discovering our uni...

    2021

  41. [49]

    , author Caravaca , G

    author Le Mou \'e lic , S. , author Caravaca , G. , author Mangold , N. , author L'Haridon , J. , author Le Deit , L. , author Mass \'e , M. , year 2019 . title Geologic mapping and stratigraphy of remote Martian outcrops using digital outcrop model and virtual reality: exampl...

    2019

  42. [50]

    , author L'Haridon , J

    author Le Mou \'e lic , S. , author L'Haridon , J. , author Civet , F. , author Mangold , N. , author Triantafyllou , A. , author Mass \'e , M. , author Le Menn , E. , author Beaunay , S. , year 2018 . title Using virtual reality to investigate geological outcrops on planetary...

    2018

  43. [51]

    , author Krolewski , A

    author Lee , K.G. , author Krolewski , A. , author White , M. , author Schlegel , D. , author Nugent , P.E. , author Hennawi , J.F. , author M \"u ller , T. , author Pan , R. , author Prochaska , J.X. , author Font-Ribera , A. , author Suzuki , N. , author Glazebrook , K. , au...

    2018

  44. [52]

    , author Kerrison , N

    author Liu , A.G. , author Kerrison , N. , author Wurmser , S. , author Falcone , J. , author Greenfield , S. , author Joyce , M. , author Marinelli , M. , author Ostling , W. , author Quayum , R. , author Williams , R. , author Liu , C. , author Y/dim Collaboration , year 202...

    2021

  45. [53]

    , author Liu , C.T

    author Liu , A.G. , author Liu , C.T. , year 2021 . title Preliminary Results of Virtual Reality Mapping of E+A Galaxies and Candidates in Nearby Rich Clusters of Galaxies . journal Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society volume 5 , pages 83

    2021

  46. [54]

    , author Mer \'e nyi , E

    author Longo , G. , author Mer \'e nyi , E. , author Ti n o , P. , year 2019 . title Foreword to the Focus Issue on Machine Intelligence in Astronomy and Astrophysics . journal PASP volume 131 , pages 100101

    2019

  47. [55]

    , author de Blok , W.J.G

    author Maccagni , F.M. , author de Blok , W.J.G. , author Mancera Pi \ n a , P.E. , author Ragusa , R. , author Iodice , E. , author Spavone , M. , author McGaugh , S. , author Oman , K.A. , author Oosterloo , T.A. , author Koribalski , B.S. , author Kim , M. , author Adams , ...

    2024

  48. [56]

    , author Kraan-Korteweg , R.C

    author Macri , L.M. , author Kraan-Korteweg , R.C. , author Lambert , T. , author Alonso , M.V. , author Berlind , P. , author Calkins , M. , author Erdo g du , P. , author Falco , E.E. , author Jarrett , T.H. , author Mink , J.D. , year 2019 . title The 2MASS Redshift Survey ...

    2019

  49. [57]

    , author Marleau , F.R

    author Makovoz , D. , author Marleau , F.R. , year 2005 . title Point-Source Extraction with MOPEX . journal PASP volume 117 , pages 1113--1128

    2005

  50. [58]

    , author Jarrett , T.H

    author Marchetti , L. , author Jarrett , T.H. , year 2018 . title The Data2Dome Initiative at the Iziko Planetarium & the IDIA Visualisation Lab , in: booktitle BigSkyEarth Conference: AstroGeoInformatics , p. pages 7

    2018

  51. [59]

    , author Fluke , C.J

    author Meade , B.F. , author Fluke , C.J. , author Manos , S. , author Sinnott , R.O. , year 2014 . title Are Tiled Display Walls Needed for Astronomy? journal PASA volume 31 , pages e033

    2014

  52. [60]

    , author Walker , M.E

    author Menon , M.S. , author Walker , M.E. , author Koris , D. , author Szafir , D. , author Burns , J.O. , year 2020 . title Virtual Reality Simulator for Telerobotics Research to Enable Artemis and the FARSIDE Low Frequency Radio Telescope . journal LPI Contributions volume ...

    2020

  53. [61]

    , author Sumner , A

    author Milisavljevic , D. , author Sumner , A. , author Takahashi , G. , author Martin , T. , author Drissen , L. , author Law , C.J. , year 2021 . title Visualization and Collaborative Exploration of Complex Multi-dimensional Data Among Distant Individuals using Virtual Reali...

    2021

  54. [62]

    , author Rafferty , D

    author Mohan , N. , author Rafferty , D. , year 2015 . title PyBDSF: Python Blob Detection and Source Finder . howpublished Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1502.007

    2015

  55. [63]

    , author Nishimichi , T

    author Moriwaki , K. , author Nishimichi , T. , author Yoshida , N. , year 2023 . title Machine learning for observational cosmology . journal Reports on Progress in Physics volume 86 , pages 076901

    2023

  56. [64]

    , author Adcock , M

    author Moss , V.A. , author Adcock , M. , author Hotan , A.W. , author Kobayashi , R. , author Rees , G.A. , author Si \'e gel , C. , author Tremblay , C.D. , author Trenham , C.E. , year 2021 . title Forging a path to a better normal for conferences and collaboration . journa...

    2021

  57. [65]

    , author Rees , G.A

    author Moss , V.A. , author Rees , G.A. , author Hotan , A.W. , author Tasker , E.J. , author Kobayashi , R. , author Kerrison , E.F. , author Amos , K.V.H. , author Ekers , R.D. , year 2023 . title Going beyond being there to bring astronomy to the world . journal Nature Astr...

    2023

  58. [66]

    , year 1994

    author Norris , R.P. , year 1994 . title The Challenge of Astronomical Visualisation , in: editor Crabtree , D.R. , editor Hanisch , R.J. , editor Barnes , J. (Eds.), booktitle Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems III , p. pages 51

    1994

  59. [67]

    , author Pillitteri , I

    author Orlando , S. , author Pillitteri , I. , author Bocchino , F. , author Daricello , L. , author Leonardi , L. , year 2019 . title 3DMAP-VR, A Project to Visualize Three-dimensional Models of Astrophysical Phenomena in Virtual Reality . journal Research Notes of the Americ...

    2019

  60. [68]

    , author Marion , C

    author Osinski , G. , author Marion , C. , author Morse , Z. , author Newman , J. , author Pilles , E. , author Tornabene , L.L. , author Caudill , C. , author Christoffersen , P. , year 2019 . title Returning to the Moon: CanMoon and the Role of Analogue Missions , in: bookti...

    2019

  61. [69]

    , author del Campo , F

    author Pietriga , E. , author del Campo , F. , author Ibsen , A. , author Primet , R. , author Appert , C. , author Chapuis , O. , author Hempel , M. , author Mu \ n oz , R. , author Eyheramendy , S. , author Jordan , A. , author Dole , H. , year 2016 . title Exploratory visua...

    2016

  62. [70]

    , author Taylor , M.B

    author Polsterer , K.L. , author Taylor , M.B. , year 2017 . title Virtual Observatory Virtual Reality , in: editor Lorente , N.P.F. , editor Shortridge , K. , editor Wayth , R. (Eds.), booktitle Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXV , p. pages 485

    2017

  63. [71]

    , author Possami-Inesedy , A

    author Possami , A. , author Possami-Inesedy , A. , author Corpuz , G. , author Greenaway , E. , year 2021 . title Got sick of surveys or lack of social capital? An investigation on the effects of the COVID-19 lockdown on institutional surveying . journal The Australian Educat...

    2021

  64. [72]

    , author Gonz \'a lez N \'u \ n ez , J.G.N

    author Ram \' rez , E. , author Gonz \'a lez N \'u \ n ez , J.G.N. , author Hernandez , J. , author Salgado , J. , author Mora , A. , author Lammers , U. , author Mer \' n , B. , author Baines , D. , author de Marchi , G. , author Arviset , C. , year 2019 . title Analysis of A...

    2019

  65. [73]

    , author Kastner , J

    author Ramsey , B. , author Kastner , J. , author Butler , R. , author Binks , A. , author Skillman , T. , year 2024 . title Exploring NGC 2287: Insights from Gaia and TESS , in: booktitle American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts , p. pages 458.16

    2024

  66. [74]

    , author Burton , M.G

    author Romano , D. , author Burton , M.G. , author Ashley , M.C.B. , author Molinari , S. , author Rebolledo , D. , author Braiding , C. , author Schisano , E. , year 2019 . title The G332 molecular cloud ring: I. Morphology and physical characteristics . journal MNRAS volume ...

    2019

  67. [75]

    , author Fay , J

    author Rosenfield , P. , author Fay , J. , author Gilchrist , R.K. , author Cui , C. , author Weigel , A.D. , author Robitaille , T. , author Otor , O.J. , author Goodman , A. , year 2018 . title AAS WorldWide Telescope: A Seamless, Cross-platform Data Visualization Engine for...

    2018

  68. [76]

    , year 1986

    author Rots , A. , year 1986 . title Data display: searching for new avenues in image analysis. , in: editor Perley , R.A. , editor Schwab , F.R. , editor Bridle , A.H. (Eds.), booktitle Synthesis Imaging , pp. pages 231--252

    1986

  69. [77]

    , author Sepulveda , M

    author Russell , C.M.P. , author Sepulveda , M. , author Cuadra , J. , author Wang , Q. , year 2019 . title A hundred stellar winds, some X-rays, and Sgr A* walk into VR , in: booktitle AAS/High Energy Astrophysics Division , p. pages 112.86

    2019

  70. [78]

    , author Wang , Q.D

    author Russell , C.M.P. , author Wang , Q.D. , author Cuadra , J. , year 2018 . title The inner parsec of the Galactic center: hydrodynamics, X-ray modeling, and 360-degree videos , in: booktitle 42nd COSPAR Scientific Assembly , pp. pages E1.11--11--18

    2018

  71. [79]

    , author Boyer , K

    author Savani , N.P. , author Boyer , K. , author Olano , M. , year 2018 . title Scientific insights from visualizing 3D simulations in Virtual Reality environment for PSP , in: booktitle Solar Heliospheric and INterplanetary Environment (SHINE 2018) , p. pages 194

    2018

  72. [80]

    , author Berthier , J

    author Schaaff , A. , author Berthier , J. , author Da Rocha , J. , author Deparis , N. , author Derriere , S. , author Gaultier , P. , author Houpin , R. , author Normand , J. , author Ocvirk , P. , year 2015 . title Immersive 3D Visualization of Astronomical Data , in: edito...

    2015

  73. [81]

    , author Agarwal , S

    author Sen , S. , author Agarwal , S. , author Chakraborty , P. , author Singh , K.P. , year 2022 . title Astronomical big data processing using machine learning: A comprehensive review . journal Experimental Astronomy volume 53 , pages 1--43

    2022

  74. [82]

    , author Westmeier , T

    author Serra , P. , author Westmeier , T. , author Giese , N. , author Jurek , R. , author Fl \"o er , L. , author Popping , A. , author Winkel , B. , author van der Hulst , T. , author Meyer , M. , author Koribalski , B.S. , author Staveley-Smith , L. , author Courtois , H. ,...

    2015

  75. [83]

    , author Kassis , S

    author Severson , S. , author Kassis , S. , author Windmiller , G. , author SSU VR Team , author SDSU VR Team , year 2020 . title Evaluating Virtual Reality as a Tool for Astronomy Education , in: booktitle American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts , p. pages 202.04

    2020

  76. [84]

    , author Dodson , K.E

    author Sims , M.H. , author Dodson , K.E. , author Edwards , L.J. , year 2010 . title Hyperwall Use as a Tool for Collaboration , in: booktitle Astrobiology Science Conference 2010: Evolution and Life: Surviving Catastrophes and Extremes on Earth and Beyond , p. pages 5614

    2010

  77. [85]

    , author Koelemeijer , P

    author Toussaint , R. , author Koelemeijer , P. , author Zaroli , C. , year 2020 . title Inside blue dots - Grasping dynamic global fields thanks to Virtual Reality , in: booktitle EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts , p. pages 11708

    2020

  78. [86]

    , author Gommers , R

    author Virtanen , P. , author Gommers , R. , author Oliphant , T.E. , author Haberland , M. , author Reddy , T. , author Cournapeau , D. , author Burovski , E. , author Peterson , P. , author Weckesser , W. , author Bright , J. , author van der Walt , S.J. , author Brett , M. ...

    2020

  79. [87]

    , author B \'e rczi , S

    author Vizi , P.G. , author B \'e rczi , S. , year 2020 . title Apollo Memorial Year for the Planetary Science Education - Real and VR Exhibition , in: booktitle Lunar and Planetary Science Conference , p. pages 2916

    2020

  80. [88]

    , author Burns , J.O

    author Walker , M.E. , author Burns , J.O. , author Szafir , D.J. , year 2018 . title VR Simulation Testbed: Improving Surface Telerobotics for the Deep Space Gateway , in: booktitle Deep Space Gateway Concept Science Workshop , p. pages 3095

    2018

  81. [89]

    , author Goode , S.R

    author Webb , S.A. , author Goode , S.R. , year 2023 . title An Astronomers Guide to Machine Learning . journal arXiv e-prints arXiv:2304.00512 http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.00512

    2023 arXiv

  82. [90]

    , author Deg , N

    author Westmeier , T. , author Deg , N. , author Spekkens , K. , author Reynolds , T.N. , author Shen , A.X. , author Gaudet , S. , author Goliath , S. , author Huynh , M.T. , author Venkataraman , P. , author Lin , X. , author O'Beirne , T. , author Catinella , B. , author Co...

    2022

  83. [91]

    , author Kitaeff , S

    author Westmeier , T. , author Kitaeff , S. , author Pallot , D. , author Serra , P. , author van der Hulst , J.M. , author Jurek , R.J. , author Elagali , A. , author For , B.Q. , author Kleiner , D. , author Koribalski , B.S. , author Lee-Waddell , K. , author Mould , J.R. ,...

    2021

  84. [92]

    , author Schuberth , B.S.A

    author Wiedemann , M. , author Schuberth , B.S.A. , author Colli , L. , author Bunge , H.P. , author Kranzlm \"u ller , D. , year 2020 . title Visualising large-scale geodynamic simulations: How to Dive into Earth's Mantle with Virtual Reality , in: booktitle EGU General Assem...

    2020

  85. [93]

    , author Truong , T.C

    author Zelinka , I. , author Truong , T.C. , author Bao , D.Q. , author Kojecky , L. , author Amer , E. , year 2021 . title Artifical Intelligence in Astrophysics , in: editor Zelinka , I. , editor Brescia , M. , editor Baron , D. (Eds.), booktitle Intelligent Astrophysics. Ed...

    2021

  86. [94]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.