SIDE: Socially Informed Drought Estimation Toward Understanding Societal Impact Dynamics of Environmental Crisis

Anav Vora; Bozhang Chen; Dong Wang; Lanyu Shang; Na Wei; Ruohan Zong; Shiwei Liu; Ximing Cai; Yang Zhang

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 31 references

SIDE: Socially Informed Drought Estimation Toward Understanding Societal Impact Dynamics of Environmental Crisis

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that drought monitoring can be improved by treating social media and news text as a measurable societal-impact signal, and reports that a joint severity-impact model using cross-attention outperforms five baselines on…

desk verdict Severity forecasting is promising; societal impact evaluation is circular because the target is generated by the paper's own DSIQ pipeline. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.12575 v1 pith:E5XREJ5N submitted 2024-12-17 cs.SI cs.AI

Lanyu Shang , Bozhang Chen , Shiwei Liu , Yang Zhang , Ruohan Zong , Anav Vora , Ximing Cai , Na Wei

show 1 more author

Dong Wang

This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.SIcs.AI

keywords droughtestimationsocietalimpactsocialmedianewscross-attentiontimeseriesforecastingBERTopicDSCI

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Drought monitoring has relied on physical measurements, but the human consequences of drought are not well captured by rain and soil-moisture numbers alone. This paper argues that the conversation about drought on social media and in the news is itself a signal of societal impact, and that it can be quantified into a distribution over eleven impact categories. It proposes SIDE, a framework that extracts topics from this text, maps them to those categories, and uses a cross-attention mechanism to couple the resulting impact distribution with the physical drought index. On weekly data from California and Texas, SIDE reports lower forecast errors and higher median forecast accuracy than five recent time-series baselines, and ablations show that each text stream and the attention mechanism contribute. If this holds, communities could monitor not just how dry a region is, but how its people and institutions are being affected, as the drought evolves.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is a social-physical cross-attention module that lets the encoded societal-impact time series attend to the encoded physical severity series and vice versa, producing cross-attended representations that are concatenated and fed to a joint decoder. This cross-attention is what allows the model to treat societal impact not only as a prediction target but also as an informative predictor of physical severity. Before that, the DSIQ module supplies the impact signal by clustering posts and articles into fifty topics per text source and mapping each topic to one of the eleven NIDIS determinants via an LLM, then normalizing the counts into a distribution.

What would settle it

Compare SIDE's predicted determinant distributions against independent drought-impact records for the same weeks and counties, such as USDA disaster declarations or the Drought Impact Reporter's human-annotated entries; if the text-derived distributions do not agree with those external records at least as well as a severity-only baseline, the claim that social and news media quantify societal impact is not supported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

SIDE jointly estimates future drought severity and societal impact by first converting social and news text into a normalized distribution over the NIDIS determinants using BERTopic topic clusters and an LLM-based topic-to-determinant mapping. It then encodes the lookback time series of the Drought Severity and Coverage Index (DSCI) and this impact distribution, applies bidirectional cross-attention between the two encoded series, and decodes the cross-attended representation to predict the next five weeks of both severity and impact. On the SocialDrought dataset for California and Texas, SIDE outperforms iTransformer, Koopa, TimesNet, One-Fits-All, and RWKV-TS on MAE, MSE, RMSE, and MFA for severity, with the largest reported gain being a 26.25% MAE reduction over TimesNet on California. The predicted impact distributions also track the DSIQ-computed ground truth, reproducing state-specific patterns such as agriculture being prominent in California while ecosystem and public health are more prominent in Texas.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the topic-to-determinant distribution produced by BERTopic and an LLM is a faithful measure of drought's real societal impact, so using it as ground truth is valid.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If SIDE is correct, a human-centric text signal improves drought severity forecasts beyond physical-only and standard time-series methods.
The model's output includes an upfront breakdown across the eleven societal-impact determinants, so forecasts come with an explanation of which sectors are most affected.
The joint loss couples severity and impact prediction, meaning that signals from public discourse can feed back into physical drought forecasts and vice versa.
The ablation results imply that both social and news streams carry independent predictive value, and that replacing cross-attention with a simple concatenation degrades accuracy.
The architecture treats text and physical indicators as generic inputs, so the same design can be retrained for other regions or other crisis types without structural changes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A natural next step is to validate the DSIQ-computed impact distribution against external records such as disaster declarations, crop insurance payouts, or the Drought Impact Reporter, since the current evaluation uses the DSIQ output as its own ground truth.
The cross-attention weights could be inspected to test whether public discourse leads or lags physical severity, potentially turning the model into an early-warning tool rather than a concurrent estimator.
The same social-physical cross-attention template could be tested on floods, wildfires, or heatwaves, where both physical indices and public discourse are available, to see whether the reported gains generalize beyond drought.
Replacing the LLM-based topic-to-determinant mapping with a small set of human annotations on a sample would provide a direct check on how much of the societal-impact signal depends on the LLM's commonsense alignment with the NIDIS taxonomy.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: this paper has a genuinely new problem formulation and a reasonable architecture, and the severity-forecasting results are worth looking at. But the societal-impact half of the claim does not hold as stated, because the 'ground truth' impact is computed by the same DSIQ method that produces the input features. That circularity is the load-bearing flaw.

What's new: SIDE formulates joint estimation of drought severity (DSCI) and a distribution over NIDIS societal-impact determinants from social and news text plus physical indicators. The two-module design—BERTopic topics mapped to determinants by an LLM, then a social-physical cross-attention encoder-decoder—is a sensible combination that I haven't seen in the drought literature. On severity, SIDE beats five strong time-series baselines on MAE/MSE/RMSE/MFA on both CA and TX, with gains in the 10–40% range. The ablation shows social and news inputs each contribute. That part is credible as an engineering advance, though it needs the usual robustness checks.

The soft spots: first and most important, the societal impact evaluation is circular. The paper says explicitly: 'The social and news inputs are further utilized to compute the ground-truth societal impact using the quantification method introduced in the DSIQ module.' So Mt is generated by the same pipeline that produces the input features. The model is being validated against its own text-derived index, not against any real-world impact measurement. The impact results in Figure 4 are only average predicted vs. ground-truth distributions—no quantitative error metrics against baselines. So the claim of 'accurate societal impact estimation' is unsupported. To fix this, they need external validation: economic losses, health outcomes, surveys, or at least the Drought Impact Reporter. Second, there's no code, single-run results without error bars or significance tests, and the train/validation/test split is described only as 7:1:2, not explicitly chronological. For a forecasting paper, a chronological split matters a lot, and leaky random splits can inflate results. Third, the ablation only covers severity, not impact, which is telling given the impact claim. None of these are fatal to the severity half, but they are real.

Who this is for: researchers in disaster informatics and social sensing who want to explore the social dimension of drought monitoring. It's a useful contribution to that community, and the severity results are a reasonable starting point.

My recommendation: this deserves peer review—the problem is new, the severity results are non-trivial, and the flaws are addressable. But a reviewer should push hard for external validation of the impact target, a chronological split, significance tests, and code release. As submitted, I would not accept it; I would send it back for major revision.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper introduces SIDE, a framework for jointly forecasting drought severity (DSCI) and a societal impact distribution derived from social and news media text. The DSIQ module uses BERTopic topics mapped via an LLM to NIDIS societal-impact determinants to compute a normalized distribution Mt; the SPIE module applies cross-attention between the quantified impact sequence and the physical drought severity sequence; and the SIJE module jointly predicts future severity and impact. Experiments on the SocialDrought dataset for California and Texas compare SIDE with five recent time-series baselines. Severity results (Tables 1–2) show lower MAE/MSE/RMSE and higher MFA for SIDE on both states, and an appendix ablation (Tables 3–4) attributes gains to the social/news inputs and attention. Societal impact is evaluated in Figure 4 by comparing average predicted and ground-truth determinant distributions, with no quantitative metric or baseline comparison.

Significance. If the severity results withstand scrutiny, the paper makes a useful empirical contribution: it demonstrates that social and news media inputs, integrated through a cross-attention mechanism, can improve drought severity forecasting over strong sequence-modeling baselines, and it uses a publicly available real-world dataset. The problem formulation is clear and the paper compares against five recent baselines. However, the societal-impact half of the central claim is not validated. The ground-truth impact Mt is computed by the paper's own DSIQ pipeline, and the impact evaluation contains no external validation, no quantitative metrics, and no baseline comparison. The severity results are also based on a single split that is not described as chronological, with no significance tests or variance reporting. The contribution is therefore plausible but currently overclaimed.

major comments (4)

[Evaluation, Data] The societal-impact ground truth is generated by the same DSIQ pipeline that produces the model's input features. The paper states: 'The social and news inputs are further utilized to compute the ground-truth societal impact using the quantification method introduced in the DSIQ module.' In the subsequent 'Societal Impact Estimation Performance' subsection, SIDE's predicted impact is compared against this self-generated target. This is circular for the claim that SIDE 'accurately estimates' drought's societal impact: at best it shows that SIJE can forecast a text-derived index. The authors should either validate Mt against external impact data (e.g., Drought Impact Reporter records, economic loss estimates, public-health outcomes, or survey-based impact reports) or explicitly restrict the claim to forecasting the DSIQ index rather than societal impact in the real world.
[Evaluation, Experimental Settings] The data split is described only as 'a ratio of 7:1:2' and is not stated to be chronological. For time-series forecasting with a 52-week lookback window, a random split would allow future test-period observations to appear inside the lookback windows of training samples, causing information leakage and inflating the reported accuracy. The paper must specify that the split is strictly chronological (e.g., the first 70% of weeks for training, the next 10% for validation, and the last 20% for test) and that no temporal overlap exists between training and test windows.
[Evaluation, Drought Severity Estimation Performance] Tables 1–2 and Appendix Tables 3–4 report a single run with no variance, confidence intervals, or significance tests. The claim that SIDE 'substantially outperforms' baselines rests on point estimates that could be within run-to-run or split-to-split noise, especially given a test set of roughly 20% of the time steps. The authors should report means and standard deviations over multiple random seeds, and ideally multiple chronological splits, and perform significance tests on the differences.
[Evaluation, Societal Impact Estimation Performance] This subsection provides no quantitative evaluation of societal-impact predictions and no comparison against the five baselines. Figure 4 only shows average predicted versus average ground-truth determinant distributions for SIDE, with no error metric (e.g., per-determinant MAE or KL divergence), no error bars, and no baseline curves. Consequently, the abstract and conclusion's claim that SIDE 'substantially outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in accurately estimating drought severity and its societal impact' is not supported by any evidence in this section for the societal-impact component.

minor comments (6)

[Appendix, Ablation Study] The ablation study evaluates only drought severity (Tables 3–4); there is no ablation for societal-impact prediction, so the contribution of joint training and cross-attention to the impact task remains untested.
[Equation (8) and Experimental Settings] The loss weights λ_D and λ_M are introduced in Equation (8) but their values are never reported, and no sensitivity analysis is provided; please specify how these hyperparameters were chosen.
[Evaluation, Drought Severity Estimation Performance] The metric MFA (Median Forecast Accuracy) is used but never defined; please provide its formula or a citation that defines it.
[Definition 5] The list of determinants includes 'Other' alongside the ten named NIDIS determinants, yet later the paper says δ=11; please clarify whether 'Other' is a substantive societal-impact determinant or a residual category.
[Title page and Experimental Settings] Minor presentational issues: 'UNiversity' is capitalized incorrectly in the Loyola Marymount affiliation, and 'Adam optimizer with a decay of 0.5' is ambiguous as to whether it refers to weight decay or learning-rate decay.
[General] No code or model checkpoints are provided; releasing the implementation would improve reproducibility and make the comparisons to baselines more actionable.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The societal-impact target is generated by the paper's own DSIQ pipeline, making the societal-impact branch self-referential; the drought-severity branch remains anchored to external DSCI.

self definitional [Evaluation > Data; Definition 5 and Solution > Determinant-Driven Societal Impact Quantification]
"Formally, for a given time step t, we define the quantified societal impact as Mt = [Ms,t||Mn,t] where Ms,t, Mn,t ∈ Rδ are the normalized distribution of posts/articles across the determinants from the social input and news input, respectively. ... The social and news inputs are further utilized to compute the ground-truth societal impact using the quantification method introduced in the DSIQ module."

The paper defines societal impact Mt (Definition 5) and then operationalizes it in the DSIQ module as a normalized distribution of posts/news across determinants. In the Evaluation section, the same DSIQ output is used as the ground-truth societal impact against which SIDE's predictions are measured. Because DSIQ is a component of SIDE rather than an independent external measurement, the societal-impact target is produced by the proposed framework itself. Equation (8) trains SIDE against this self-computed Mt, and the evaluation compares predicted Mt with DSIQ-computed Mt; no external societal-impact data (economic losses, health outcomes, surveys, or impact reports) is introduced.

full rationale

SIDE's drought-severity evaluation is externally grounded: DSCI comes from the U.S. Drought Monitor via the SocialDrought dataset, and Tables 1-2 compare SIDE against five baselines with quantitative metrics, so that half of the central claim is not circular. The societal-impact half is different. The paper's own Evaluation section states that the social and news inputs are used to compute the ground-truth societal impact using the DSIQ quantification method, i.e., the labels for the impact prediction task are outputs of a module inside SIDE. There is no validation of those labels against any independent measure of societal impact, and the societal-impact evaluation section reports only average predicted vs. ground-truth distributions (Figure 4) without baseline metrics. The societal-impact branch therefore validates the model against its own preprocessing, which is a partial self-definitional circularity. The score is 6 rather than higher because the forecasting task is still non-trivial and the severity branch is independent; it is lower than 8 because the derivation does not require a self-citation chain, only an unvalidated self-generated target.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on several unverified measurement assumptions: the text-to-determinant quantification is treated as ground truth, the LLM mapping is unvalidated, and post volume is treated as impact intensity. The tuning choices (topic count, windows, loss weights) are chosen by hand without sensitivity analysis, and no external social-impact benchmark is used.

free parameters (5)

Number of BERTopic topics K = 50
Chosen by hand in the experimental settings; affects the granularity of the determinant distribution.
Lookback window TL = 52 weeks
Chosen by hand; all results use this window.
Prediction window TP = 5 weeks
Chosen by hand; affects the multi-step forecasting objective.
Loss weights lambda_D and lambda_M = not reported
Control the balance between severity and impact errors; no values or sensitivity analysis are given.
Transformer hidden dimension d and other hyperparameters = not reported
Needed to reproduce the model but not specified in the paper.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The DSIQ-computed distribution over determinants is an accurate quantification of drought societal impact.
The paper defines Mt this way and uses it as ground truth, but never validates it against external impact data.
domain assumption Unsupervised topic clusters from BERTopic correspond to meaningful drought-impact themes.
Used in DSIQ; no human annotation or cluster quality check is reported.
domain assumption LLM likelihood scores correctly map topics to NIDIS determinants.
No accuracy evaluation on a labeled topic-determinant set is provided.
domain assumption The volume of social and news posts is proportional to impact severity and not merely to attention.
The normalized determinant distribution treats post counts as impact scores, which conflates attention with harm.
standard math Standard transformer and cross-attention training assumptions hold.
The method relies on standard neural network approximation and backpropagation, which are acceptable background assumptions.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of SIDE: Socially Informed Drought Estimation Toward Understanding Societal Impact Dynamics of Environmental Crisis." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/E5XREJ5N

@misc{pith2026241212575,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: SIDE: Socially Informed Drought Estimation Toward Understanding Societal Impact Dynamics of Environmental Crisis},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/E5XREJ5N}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.12575}
}

read the original abstract

Drought has become a critical global threat with significant societal impact. Existing drought monitoring solutions primarily focus on assessing drought severity using quantitative measurements, overlooking the diverse societal impact of drought from human-centric perspectives. Motivated by the collective intelligence on social media and the computational power of AI, this paper studies a novel problem of socially informed AI-driven drought estimation that aims to leverage social and news media information to jointly estimate drought severity and its societal impact. Two technical challenges exist: 1) How to model the implicit temporal dynamics of drought societal impact. 2) How to capture the social-physical interdependence between the physical drought condition and its societal impact. To address these challenges, we develop SIDE, a socially informed AI-driven drought estimation framework that explicitly quantifies the societal impact of drought and effectively models the social-physical interdependency for joint severity-impact estimation. Experiments on real-world datasets from California and Texas demonstrate SIDE's superior performance compared to state-of-the-art baselines in accurately estimating drought severity and its societal impact. SIDE offers valuable insights for developing human-centric drought mitigation strategies to foster sustainable and resilient communities.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.12575 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Overview of SIDE that the social input from social media discourse can provide valuable insights into public sentiment, concerns, and experiences related to drought. Similarly, news input, such as reports from local and national news outlets, can offer a comprehensive overview of the broader societal consequences of drought. However, the social input and news input are primarily unstructured text data, presenting… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Drought Severity and Social/News Inputs Dynam [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (1 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Societal Impact Estimation Performance Ablation Study We further conduct an ablation study to investigate the contribution of the key components in the SIDE framework. The detailed results and analysis are provided in the Appendix. Discussion Deployment The proposed S…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

[1]

, " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.a...
[2]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in capitalize " " * FUNCT...
[3]

S.; Chizari, M.; Sadighi, H.; and Alambeigi, A

Bathaiy, S. S.; Chizari, M.; Sadighi, H.; and Alambeigi, A. 2021. Social media and farmer's resilience to drought as an environmental disaster: A moderation effect. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 59: 102209

work page 2021
[4]

It never rains in California

Becker, S.; and Sparks, P. 2020. “It never rains in California”: Constructions of drought as a natural and social phenomenon. Weather and Climate Extremes, 29: 100257

work page 2020
[5]

Chatfield, C. 2000. Time-series forecasting. Chapman and Hall/CRC

work page 2000
[6]

C.; da Silva, R

Dantas, J. C.; da Silva, R. M.; and Santos, C. A. G. 2020. Drought impacts, social organization, and public policies in northeastern Brazil: a case study of the upper Para \' ba River basin. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 192: 1--21

work page 2020
[7]

DIP-Drought. 2024. https://droughtweb.web.illinois.edu/

work page 2024
[8]

Edwards, B.; Gray, M.; and Hunter, B. 2019. The social and economic impacts of drought. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 54(1): 22--31

work page 2019

Show all 31 references

[9]

Farahmand, A.; Reager, J.; and Madani, N. 2021. Drought cascade in the terrestrial water cycle: Evidence from remote sensing. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(14): e2021GL093482

2021
[10]

Grootendorst, M. 2022. BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedure. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.05794

2022 arXiv
[11]

Hou, H.; and Yu, F. R. 2024. RWKV-TS: Beyond Traditional Recurrent Neural Network for Time Series Tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.09093

2024 arXiv
[12]

B.; Ord, J

Hyndman, R.; Koehler, A. B.; Ord, J. K.; and Snyder, R. D. 2008. Forecasting with exponential smoothing: the state space approach. Springer Science & Business Media

2008
[13]

Kam, J.; Stowers, K.; and Kim, S. 2019. Monitoring of drought awareness from google trends: a case study of the 2011--17 California drought. Weather, Climate, and Society, 11(2): 419--429

2019
[14]

Lester, L.; Flatau, P.; and Kyron, M. 2022. Understanding the Social Impacts of Drought. Perth: The University of Western Australia

2022
[15]

Lim, B.; and Zohren, S. 2021. Time-series forecasting with deep learning: a survey. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 379(2194): 20200209

2021
[16]

Liu, Y.; Hu, T.; Zhang, H.; Wu, H.; Wang, S.; Ma, L.; and Long, M. 2023. itransformer: Inverted transformers are effective for time series forecasting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.06625

2023 arXiv
[17]

Liu, Y.; Li, C.; Wang, J.; and Long, M. 2024. Koopa: Learning non-stationary time series dynamics with koopman predictors. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36

2024
[18]

M.; Cole, S

Medellin-Azuara, J.; Escriva-Bou, A.; Rodriguez-Flores, J. M.; Cole, S. A.; Abatzoglou, J.; Viers, J. H.; Santos, N.; Summer, D. A.; Medina, C.; Arevalo, R.; et al. 2022. Economic Impacts of the 2020--22 Drought on California Agriculture

2022
[19]

National Integrated Drought Information System. 2024. https://www.drought.gov/

2024
[20]

Naumann, G.; Cammalleri, C.; Mentaschi, L.; and Feyen, L. 2021. Increased economic drought impacts in Europe with anthropogenic warming. Nature Climate Change, 11(6): 485--491

2021
[21]

Savelli, E.; Rusca, M.; Cloke, H.; and Di Baldassarre, G. 2022. Drought and society: Scientific progress, blind spots, and future prospects. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 13(3): e761

2022
[22]

Seager, R.; Ting, M.; Alexander, P.; Nakamura, J.; Liu, H.; Li, C.; and Simpson, I. R. 2022. Mechanisms of a meteorological drought onset: Summer 2020 to spring 2021 in southwestern North America. Journal of Climate, 35(22): 7367--7385

2022
[23]

Shang, L.; Chen, B.; Vora, A.; Zhang, Y.; Cai, X.; and Wang, D. 2024. SocialDrought: A Social and News Media Driven Dataset and Analytical Platform Towards Understanding Societal Impact of Drought . https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10516342

2024 doi
[24]

H.; Stoffer, D

Shumway, R. H.; Stoffer, D. S.; Shumway, R. H.; and Stoffer, D. S. 2017. ARIMA models. Time series analysis and its applications: with R examples, 75--163

2017
[25]

H.; Tyre, A

Smith, K. H.; Tyre, A. J.; Tang, Z.; Hayes, M. J.; and Akyuz, F. A. 2020. Calibrating human attention as indicator monitoring\# drought in the Twittersphere. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 101(10): E1801--E1819

2020
[26]

H.; Magee, T.; Moreno, C.; Reed-Kelly, R.; Taylor, M.; et al

Sugg, M.; Runkle, J.; Leeper, R.; Bagli, H.; Golden, A.; Handwerger, L. H.; Magee, T.; Moreno, C.; Reed-Kelly, R.; Taylor, M.; et al. 2020. A scoping review of drought impacts on health and society in North America. Climatic Change, 162: 1177--1195

2020
[27]

USDM. 2024. https://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/

2024
[28]

M.; Guinan, P

Weaver, S. M.; Guinan, P. E.; Semenova, I. G.; Aloysius, N.; Lupo, A. R.; and Hunt, S. 2023. A case study of drought during summer 2022: A large-scale analyzed comparison of dry and moist summers in the Midwest USA. Atmosphere, 14(9): 1448

2023
[29]

Wu, H.; Hu, T.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, H.; Wang, J.; and Long, M. 2022. Timesnet: Temporal 2d-variation modeling for general time series analysis. In The eleventh international conference on learning representations

2022
[30]

Zhang, B.; Salem, F. K. A.; Hayes, M. J.; and Tadesse, T. 2022. Quantitative Assessment of Drought Impacts Using XGBoost based on the Drought Impact Reporter. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.02768

2022 arXiv
[31]

Zhou, T.; Niu, P.; Sun, L.; Jin, R.; et al. 2024. One fits all: Power general time series analysis by pretrained lm. Advances in neural information processing systems, 36

2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

, " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.a...

[2] [2]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in capitalize " " * FUNCT...

[3] [3]

S.; Chizari, M.; Sadighi, H.; and Alambeigi, A

Bathaiy, S. S.; Chizari, M.; Sadighi, H.; and Alambeigi, A. 2021. Social media and farmer's resilience to drought as an environmental disaster: A moderation effect. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 59: 102209

work page 2021

[4] [4]

It never rains in California

Becker, S.; and Sparks, P. 2020. “It never rains in California”: Constructions of drought as a natural and social phenomenon. Weather and Climate Extremes, 29: 100257

work page 2020

[5] [5]

Chatfield, C. 2000. Time-series forecasting. Chapman and Hall/CRC

work page 2000

[6] [6]

C.; da Silva, R

Dantas, J. C.; da Silva, R. M.; and Santos, C. A. G. 2020. Drought impacts, social organization, and public policies in northeastern Brazil: a case study of the upper Para \' ba River basin. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 192: 1--21

work page 2020

[7] [7]

DIP-Drought. 2024. https://droughtweb.web.illinois.edu/

work page 2024

[8] [8]

Edwards, B.; Gray, M.; and Hunter, B. 2019. The social and economic impacts of drought. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 54(1): 22--31

work page 2019